Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fairfield, Solano County, California — state license #486803806, licensed for 250 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 116 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 250 residents · Fairfield, CA · Solano County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #486803806, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3350 Cherry Hills Court · Fairfield, Solano County
Phone
(707) 425-3588
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 242 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 242 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 146 times and filed 116 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 9, 2026
Occupancy at the October 10, 2024 visit
161 of 250 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 29, 2021 to October 10, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (18). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 76 of 116 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
202611 state visits · 15 documents
Jul 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202524 state visits · 41 documents
Dec 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202412 state visits · 16 documents
Dec 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff illegally evicted resident

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Complainant has alleged that facility has refused the return of R1 to the facility following a hospitalization due to a prohibited condition that would preclude R1's residency in the facility. R1 has a CVC catheter. During the course of this investigation statements were taken, documents reviewed and a consult occurred with a Program Clinical Consultant. Based upon the statements, documents and consult, the following determinations are made: The type of CVC catheter (Perm-Cath) used by R1 is not a prohibited condition that would preclude R1's residency in the facility; R1 was illegally evicted by the facility when R1 was not allowed to return. Based upon these determinations, statements, and documents, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of Californiathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240918175043
Oct 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide written notice of rate increase

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this Complaint. During the course of this investigation, documents were obtained and reviewed and statements were taken. The following determinations are made: Complainant alleges that facility did not provide written notice of rate increase; Administrator has produced a written document dated 6/28/2024 addressed to the Complaint Subject and the Responsible Person which outlines the rate increases effective 9/1/2024. Based upon the document reviewed, the allegation is determined to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that it is false and, or, without a reasonable basis. The complaint is DISMISSED. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240822130836
Oct 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a pressure injury due to lack of care from staff Staff are billing resident for services not being rendered by staff Staff do not ensure that resident receives daily activities Staff do not ensure that resident is adequately fed

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. During the course of this investigation five site visits were conducted, statements were taken and documents were obtained and reviewed. The following determinations are made: The Complaint Subject (R1) and spouse (R2) state that they have received satisfactory care from staff and do not desire to engage in facility sponsored activities; R1's Physician states Physician has received no negative reports regarding care from Hospice and Home Health nurses; R1's Hospice Nurse reports no concerns regarding facility's care provided to R1, including weight maintenance. Although the allegations may be true, or valid, based upon statements and reviewed documents there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove, or disprove, the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report left. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240624152843
Sep 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing laundry services to a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Complainant has alleged that soiled clothing has been observed in residents' (R1 & R2) apartment and that the laundry service is not adequate. During the course of this investigation, statement were taken and documents reviewed, as well as site visits made to the facility. Unannounced visits to residents apartment have not confirmed the allegation as clean clothes were observed in the closets. Furthermore, when interviewed, residents R1 & R2 stated they were satisfied with the laundry service and had no concerns regarding the condition of their clothing. Although the allegation may be true, based upon the statements and observations, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or, disprove, the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240830123526
Sep 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff were not giving resident showers Staff were not assisting resident with oral hygiene

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. During the course of this investigation statements were taken, documents were obtained and reviewed and site visits were made to the facility. The following determinations are made: Shower logs for the available period for R1 indicate that R1 was given showers in compliance with R1's care plan; Care notes indicate R1 periodically refused staff efforts to provide care, including showers; Complainant claims to have documentation from R1's dentist that would support the allegation that staff do not assist with oral hygiene; Complainant has not produced any documentation regarding R1's oral hygiene; This Department has made many requests for the documentation. Although the allegations may be true, based upon the statements and documents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or, disprove, the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report left. Unthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240726091308
Aug 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure that resident received medical attention in a timely manner. Licensee did not ensure that staff followed infection control practices as necessary.

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with the Administrator and discussed the disposition of this complaint. Complainant has alleged that a resident contracted a contagious infection and that staff were subsequently afflicted with the infection due to the facility's management not following accepted protocols to deal with the condition. This investigation has resulted in the following determinations: The Complainant has no direct knowledge of the allegations, was told of the allegations by a third party who has not been identified, and has not identified the resident or staff involved; The Administrator states that there has been no reported cases of infection that match the alleged one during the course of the last six months. Although the allegation may be true, or valid, based on the statements made, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or, disprove, the allegations. Therefore, the allegathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240802134502
Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights Violation

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. During the course of the investigation, witnesses were interviewed; site visits made; documents were obtained and reviewed. The following determinations are made: It has been alleged that unnamed staff spoke rudely to R1 while providing hygiene care to R1; Staff who routinely provide care for R1 deny the allegation; Family members report having been told by R1 of the rude behavior by staff; R1 has denied the allegation when interviewed in private by staff from this Department; No actual witnesses to the alleged behavior have been identified. Although the allegation may be true, based upon the statements and documents reviewed, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation did or, did not, occur. therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report left. No citations issued today. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230926122904
Oct 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure facility is adequately staffed to meet resident’s needs. Licensee does not ensure residents are provided a clean mattress. Staff do not assist residents with bathing as needed. Staff do not ensure medication is administered to residents.

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced and meets with Assistant ED to deliver findings. Investigative determinations follow: Residents' mattress, which was damaged as a result of overflowing toilet, was professionally cleaned by facility but not to satisfaction of resdients; facility subsequently reimbursed for a new mattress; Shower logs indicate R1 consistently refused to shower and that R2 was showered by staff in substantial compliance with R2's care plan; LPA received photographs which allegedly depict R1's medication loose on the floor of R1's room; R1's physician has indicated that R1 is able to administer and store R1's medications; Although there has been incidents where staff did not respond to calls for assistance in a timely manner and allegations that staff have been observed to be not fully alert while on duty, no direct evidence was found to prove these issues are the result of inadequate staffing. Although the allegations may be true, or valid, based uponthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230614123412
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations32typical 1
Type B citations19typical 1
Substantiated complaints55typical 2
Total complaints69typical 7
State visits on file146typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261115020252441020241216120231114120221620320219111
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Solano County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 425-3588

Is Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The licensed?

Yes — Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fairfield (Solano County): California license #486803806, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 250 residents. State records list 116 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 242 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Solano County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

161 of 250 beds occupied (64%) when the state visited on October 10, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 146 state visits and 116 dated documents since 2021 for Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 10, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff illegally evicted resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Complainant has alleged that facility has refused the return of R1 to the facility following a hospitalization due to a prohibited condition that would preclude R1's residency in the facility. R1 has a CVC catheter. During the course of this investigation statements were taken, documents reviewed and a consult occurred with a Program Clinical Consultant. Based upon the statements, documents and consult, the following determinations are made: The type of CVC catheter (Perm-Cath) used by R1 is not a prohibited condition that would preclude R1's residency in the facility; R1 was illegally evicted by the facility when R1 was not allowed to return. Based upon these determinations, statements, and documents, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of CaliforniaCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240918175043
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide written notice of rate increase
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this Complaint. During the course of this investigation, documents were obtained and reviewed and statements were taken. The following determinations are made: Complainant alleges that facility did not provide written notice of rate increase; Administrator has produced a written document dated 6/28/2024 addressed to the Complaint Subject and the Responsible Person which outlines the rate increases effective 9/1/2024. Based upon the document reviewed, the allegation is determined to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that it is false and, or, without a reasonable basis. The complaint is DISMISSED. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240822130836
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a pressure injury due to lack of care from staff Staff are billing resident for services not being rendered by staff Staff do not ensure that resident receives daily activities Staff do not ensure that resident is adequately fed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. During the course of this investigation five site visits were conducted, statements were taken and documents were obtained and reviewed. The following determinations are made: The Complaint Subject (R1) and spouse (R2) state that they have received satisfactory care from staff and do not desire to engage in facility sponsored activities; R1's Physician states Physician has received no negative reports regarding care from Hospice and Home Health nurses; R1's Hospice Nurse reports no concerns regarding facility's care provided to R1, including weight maintenance. Although the allegations may be true, or valid, based upon statements and reviewed documents there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove, or disprove, the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report left. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240624152843
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing laundry services to a resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Complainant has alleged that soiled clothing has been observed in residents' (R1 & R2) apartment and that the laundry service is not adequate. During the course of this investigation, statement were taken and documents reviewed, as well as site visits made to the facility. Unannounced visits to residents apartment have not confirmed the allegation as clean clothes were observed in the closets. Furthermore, when interviewed, residents R1 & R2 stated they were satisfied with the laundry service and had no concerns regarding the condition of their clothing. Although the allegation may be true, based upon the statements and observations, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or, disprove, the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 17, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240830123526
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff were not giving resident showers Staff were not assisting resident with oral hygiene
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. During the course of this investigation statements were taken, documents were obtained and reviewed and site visits were made to the facility. The following determinations are made: Shower logs for the available period for R1 indicate that R1 was given showers in compliance with R1's care plan; Care notes indicate R1 periodically refused staff efforts to provide care, including showers; Complainant claims to have documentation from R1's dentist that would support the allegation that staff do not assist with oral hygiene; Complainant has not produced any documentation regarding R1's oral hygiene; This Department has made many requests for the documentation. Although the allegations may be true, based upon the statements and documents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or, disprove, the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report left. UnCDSS inspection report, September 6, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240726091308
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure that resident received medical attention in a timely manner. Licensee did not ensure that staff followed infection control practices as necessary.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with the Administrator and discussed the disposition of this complaint. Complainant has alleged that a resident contracted a contagious infection and that staff were subsequently afflicted with the infection due to the facility's management not following accepted protocols to deal with the condition. This investigation has resulted in the following determinations: The Complainant has no direct knowledge of the allegations, was told of the allegations by a third party who has not been identified, and has not identified the resident or staff involved; The Administrator states that there has been no reported cases of infection that match the alleged one during the course of the last six months. Although the allegation may be true, or valid, based on the statements made, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or, disprove, the allegations. Therefore, the allegaCDSS inspection report, August 13, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240802134502

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights Violation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. During the course of the investigation, witnesses were interviewed; site visits made; documents were obtained and reviewed. The following determinations are made: It has been alleged that unnamed staff spoke rudely to R1 while providing hygiene care to R1; Staff who routinely provide care for R1 deny the allegation; Family members report having been told by R1 of the rude behavior by staff; R1 has denied the allegation when interviewed in private by staff from this Department; No actual witnesses to the alleged behavior have been identified. Although the allegation may be true, based upon the statements and documents reviewed, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation did or, did not, occur. therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report left. No citations issued today. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230926122904
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure facility is adequately staffed to meet resident’s needs. Licensee does not ensure residents are provided a clean mattress. Staff do not assist residents with bathing as needed. Staff do not ensure medication is administered to residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced and meets with Assistant ED to deliver findings. Investigative determinations follow: Residents' mattress, which was damaged as a result of overflowing toilet, was professionally cleaned by facility but not to satisfaction of resdients; facility subsequently reimbursed for a new mattress; Shower logs indicate R1 consistently refused to shower and that R2 was showered by staff in substantial compliance with R2's care plan; LPA received photographs which allegedly depict R1's medication loose on the floor of R1's room; R1's physician has indicated that R1 is able to administer and store R1's medications; Although there has been incidents where staff did not respond to calls for assistance in a timely manner and allegations that staff have been observed to be not fully alert while on duty, no direct evidence was found to prove these issues are the result of inadequate staffing. Although the allegations may be true, or valid, based uponCDSS inspection report, August 22, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230614123412
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff ignored resident(s). Facility staff did not meet resident's care needs Facility staff did not provide toilet paper for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Village at Rancho Solano, The for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by the Receptionist, Maria Aispuro and was granted access into the facility. Assistant Administrator, Lauren Cottman arrived 15 minutes later. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi reviewed resident(s) records, facility records, interviewed staff, residents and various outside parties, including but not limited to responsible parties and witnesses. Complaint alleges facility staff ignored resident(s) and facility staff did not meet resident’s care needs. Based on interviews and observations that were conducted during the investigation, LPA could not prove or disprove the allegation of staff ignoring residents in care. LPA toured the facility on April 11, 2023, and found residents doing activities with staff members. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230410131207
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFood Service Personal Rights Physical Plant issue-No heat in room and kitchen sink is leaking
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Village at Rancho Solano, The for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Assistant Executive Director, Francine Taitano, and was granted access into the facility. Also participating in the delivery of findings is Executive Director, Brittany Andrews from a sister community. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi reviewed resident(s) records, staff records, facility records, interviewed staff, residents and various outside parties, including but not limited to responsible parties and witnesses. Complaint alleges food service. Based on interviews that were conducted, LPA learned that the facility cooks food daily, and serves three meals to residents in placement. However, residents can have the choice to eat or not eat during servings of food. Facility does offer alternatives when asked and offers snacks. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 11, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230214161618
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff is not administering resident's medication as prescribed. Facility does not have sufficient staff to meet residents' needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Village at Rancho Solano, The for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Assistant Executive Director, Francine Taitano, and was granted access into the facility. Also participating in the delivery of findings is Executive Director, Brittany Andrews from a sister community. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi reviewed resident(s) records, staff records, facility records, interviewed staff, residents and various outside parties, including but not limited to responsible parties and witnesses. Complaint alleges that Facility staff is not administering resident's medication as prescribed. During the course of the investigation, Facility records were reviewed, and LPA learned that the facility made attempts to refill the medication; however, the pharmacy was late on delivering the medication. On February 27, 2023, attempts were made on the facilities behalf to inquirCDSS inspection report, April 11, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230301102827
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond to resident's call for assistance in a timely manner Staff are not adequately trained to meet the needs of residents in care Staff do not answer the facility after hours phone line
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Village at Rancho Solano, The for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Assistant Executive Director, Francine Taitano, and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi reviewed resident(s) records, staff records, facility records, interviewed staff, residents and various outside parties, including but not limited to responsible parties and witnesses. During the review of resident records on February 9, 2023, LPA observed and identified that Resident #4 was last reappraised on July 2021 (See LIC 9102-Technical Violation). (Report continued on LIC 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 13, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230130105428
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide adequate supervision resulting in an injury Facility did not seek timely medical attention
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of closing this complaint. LPA met with Rammy Kaur and discussed the findings. This Department has investigated the allegations by conducting interviews and obtaining and reviewing documents. Based upon the documents and interviews, the following determinations are made: R1, who is a fall risk, required bathroom assistance and status checks; Care staff were aware of R1's status and checked on R1 at approximately 3:30 am on night of 08/27/2022; approximately 1 hour and 20 minutes later R1 was checked again and found to have fallen to the floor and sustained an injury; Staff immediately called 911 and remained with R1 until paramedics arrived. Although the allegations may be true, based upon the interviews and documents reviewed, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations true or, not true. therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report left. No citations issued today. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 17, 2023 · control 21-AS-20220829163730

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not maintain facility free from hazard
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Village at Rancho Solano, The for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA met with the Administrator, Ramandeep Kaur, and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi interviewed staff, residents and various outside parties, including but not limited to responsible parties. LPA conducted a tour of the facility and made observations on November 07, 2022. Complaint alleges that Licensee did not maintain facility free from hazard. Based on interviews with staff members, residents and a tour of the facility that was conducted on November 07, 2022, LPA learned that Resident #1 fell and sustained a fracture that was due to uneven flooring from a metal plate (See LIC 9099D). LPA observed the metal plate on November 07, 2022 during the tour of the facility. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 18, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221031142328
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair (door)
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Village at Rancho Solano, The for the purpose of conducting a complaint investigation inspection. LPA met with the Administrator, Ramandeep Kaur, and was granted access into the facility. Complaint alleges that Facility is in disrepair (door). During the opening of the complaint investigation inspection, LPA toured the facility with the Maintenance Director, Kyle Benavidez and found the facility to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction (See LIC 812-Observation). During the course of the investigation on November 18, 2022, LPA learned via an interview with the Administrator that the door leading into Memory Care was fixed approriately and in a timely manner. In addition, LPA obtained documentation indicating that the Memory Care door was fixed timely. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 18, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221114162758
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of Supervision resulted in resident sustaining multiple fractures while in care Staff pushed resident Staff falsified incident reports Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents Staff are not meeting residents hygiene needs Staff are not wearing masks
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Leibert arrived unannounced and met with Pam Hardesty to discuss findings on this complaint. This Department investigated the allegations by making site visits, taking statements, reviewing documents and photographs. The following determinations are made: Statements and documents suggest that R1's fall was not the result of staff neglect and there is conflicting statements regarding the allegation staff pushed R1; Complainant has not responded to this Department's request for information regarding the false reporting allegation; Documents and statements indicate that R1 frequently refused staff's attempt to provide hygiene care and showers; Reviews of facility's menus and discussions with witnesses suggests that the food service at the facility meets the requirements of Title Twenty-Two regulations; There are differing opinions regarding the staff's compliance with requirements to wear masks; At every unannounced site visit to the facility, staff and visitors were observed to complCDSS inspection report, October 25, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220712110529
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left residents unattended Staff did not respond to call bell
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
The Department conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. Licensing Program Analyst Fernandes-Goes arrived unannounced for the purpose of closing the investigation and met with Blaine Lyons - Acting ED. On 2/24/2022, LPA Willis opened the complaint investigation. Department conducted a follow up visit on 4/11 and 8/11/2022 to tour the facility; conducted interviews; acquired documentation; and made observations of the facility. During documentation review on file, observations, and interviews of staff, residents, and complainant on ,2/24, 4/11, 5/20, 8/11, and 8/25/2022 Department learned that facility alarm system staff responded to call bell but not timely. According to records on 2/17/2022 from 100 % of calls 22 % were answered in a time frame of 10 to 29 min and 9.6 % of calls took 30 min to 1 hr 18 min to be answered. (copy of records on file) - Continued LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 16, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220217094331
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of Care: Staff did not call emergency services when resident sustained fractures
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts Willis and Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director, Jillian Hunter. Neglect/Lack of Care: Staff did not call emergency services when resident sustained fractures - Per facility self-report resident, R1 sustained a fall September 2020 and experienced discomfort in their knee. Hospice was notified approximately two hours after the fall and arrived at the facility approximately two hours after being called. Per interviews, R1’s pain increased while they were waiting for hospice to arrive, but the facility did not call (911) per direction from the resident’s family. Once hospice arrived it was reported that resident had a change of condition – increased pain and they could not stand or walk. 911 was then called and R1 was transported to the hospital. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 16, 2022 · control 21-AS-20211112160418
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical care for resident in care Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple injuries
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts Felias and Willis arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations and met with Acting Administrator, Jillian Hunter The complaint alleges that staff did not seek timely medical care for resident in care and Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple injuries. Based on interviews with staff, residents, outside parties and a review of medical records, the investigation showed that on 8/28/2021, Resident (R1) was found in a sitting position after pressing their call pendant due to a fall in R1’s room. Record review revealed that it took approximately 35 minutes for staff to respond to the call for help. A further review of facility records show that staff have been trained to call 911 for a resident who falls and is on a blood thinner. This did not take place when R1 fell. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 24, 2022 · control 21-AS-20210910085402
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident handled roughly Neglect/Lack of supervision resulting in unwitnessed fall
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of continuing the investigation of this complaint. LPA toured portions of the facility and took additional statements from residents. LPA met with Executive Director and delivered findings. Based upon interviews and documents, the following determination are made: R1 has sustained injuries and bruising from falls occurring at the facility; R1 has medical conditions that put R1 at high risk for falls and injuries; R1 has fallen on many occasions; Facility records indicate fall protocols have been followed by staff and R1's personal physician indicates that R1 is not a candidate for pendant call device; R1 and family member state that R1 receives good care and that staff care for R1 appropriately; Outside professionals state that R1 receives appropriate care at the facility; No witnesses to alleged rough handling of R1 have been identified. While the allegations may be true, based upon the statements made and documentsCDSS inspection report, February 17, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220111161722

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 146 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
32
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
19
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
55
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
69
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
146
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Welltower Pegasus Tenant Llc; Psl Associates Llc, who operates 4 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 425-3588
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Village At Rancho Solano Assisted Living, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.