Mid-size home · Licensed for 9 · Redlands
Rose Valley Redlands II
1309 Farview Ln, Redlands, CA 92374Licensed since 2018
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 9: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
3 AMBULATORY 6 NON- AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Rose Valley Redlands II: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,200a month to start
Likely $4,100–$6,850
From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,200likely a month
Starting monthly rate$5,200likely $4,100–$6,850
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,100–$7,000
- $5,200
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,950–$10,050
- $7,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $6,500
10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,800–$6,000.
- Pacific PinesRedlands · 0.7 mi · Mid-size home$5,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa BienRedlands · 0.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aspen Grove Home CareRedlands · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Canyon View Pacific HomeRedlands · 1.7 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Adora CareRedlands · 2.0 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Ancheta's PlaceMentone · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Blessed Garden HomeRedlands · 2.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Assisted Living of AmericaYucaipa · 4.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Yucaipa Valley Board & CareYucaipa · 4.7 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Divine Home CareLoma Linda · 4.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
1309 Farview Ln, Redlands, CA 92374Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Redlands Community HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #361880517 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 9 of 10 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated” and 1 “Unfounded”.
20254 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Marsie Marcos, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (9), a current census of (6). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in resident bathrooms measured between 106 and 110 degrees F. Resident bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dressers, storage space and lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, facility license, administrator certificate, activity schedule, personal rights, facility sketch, emergency disaster plan and telephone numbers, menu, CCLD complaint poster, sample of facility's admissions agreement, and Ombudsman poster. During the inspection of the facility, LPA observed a unknown male individual sitting outside near the front side of the facility. LPA asked Administrator who the person was. Administrator stated that they were the spouse of the one of the caregivers. After inquiring for more information, the Administrator disclosed to the LPA that they hired the individual/staff #1 as a caregiver but their criminal record clearance is still pending and is temporarily residing at the facility. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining area are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are stored locked. LPA's review of resident medication records, reveals that Resident #1(R1) still had three (3) of today's (12/12/25), morning medications in the bubble pack; however, staff initialed that the (3) medications were administered in the morning. Administrator informed LPA that medication may have been missed due to the way the medication was stored and may have been separated from the other AM medications. Record Review: Three (3) resident records were reviewed for admission's agreements, appraisals, and medical assessments. Review of three (3) staff files reveals the Administrator, Staff #2(S2), Staff#3(S3) did not have a health screening which indicates that that they are physically qualified to perform their job duties and signed by examining physician. Deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. Civil penalties have been accessed for have not having a criminal record clearance for S1 prior to them residing and/or working at the facility. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided with appeal rights to Administrator Marsie Marcos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2025
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not maintain accurate medication records for residents Staff do not store residents’ medication in original container Staff do not ensure facility is free from odors
On 12/02/2025 at 4:15PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renese Howell-Small conducted an unannounced visit to the residence in order to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator, Marsie Marcos. The investigation consisted of interviews, record review and observation. In regards to the allegation of staff do not maintain accurate medication records for residents: LPA interviewed three (3) staff. LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Record(s) (MAR) for five (5) residents in care and audited medications. Staff denied the allegation. Based on interviews and record review, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation of staff do not store residents’ medication in original container: LPA observed all resident medication(s) to be in their original containers. Staff denied the allegation. Based upon observation and interview, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Unsubstantiated SUBSTANTIATED is defined as the complaint allegation(s) is valid and a violation has occurred based on the preponderance of available evidence. Two deficiencies will be cited. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099A, LIC9099C, LIC9099D and Appeal Rights were discussed, and a copy was provided to Administrator, Marsie Marcos. In regards to the allegation of staff do not ensure facility is free from odors: LPA observed five (5) residents in care and two (2) staff assisting residents. LPA conducted a brief tour of the residence and found it to be sanitary and free from mal odors. Based upon observation, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. UNSUBSTANTIATED is defined as the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099 and LIC9099C was discussed and copies were provided to staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240321113158
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(5)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 3, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (5) Facility staff, except those authorized by law, shall... : (D).. does not include..., hiding or camouflaging medications in other substances... without the resident's knowledge and consent.. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based upon interview and record review, the Administrator did not ensure that the resident exercised their right to refuse medication by hiding Resident 1 (R1's) medication in their food which poses/posed an immediate risk to health and safety of resident(s) in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025
Plan of correction: The Administrator will conduct a staff training on medications, review the regulations on Medication and submit proof to LPA by the Plan of Correction (POC) due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 5, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (b) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is able to determine and communicate his/her need...(2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the Administrator did not ensure that the resident(s) in care were given their medications according to the physician's orders which posed/poses a potential risk to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025
Plan of correction: The Administrator will conduct a staff training on medication and submit proof to LPA by Plan of Correction (POC) due date.
Mar 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure a fire safety measure is being followed
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Aministrator Marsie Marcos, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA observed a smoke alarm detached from its mount. Although the smoke alarm is detached from its mount, it is functional. LPA proceeded to test another smoke alarm in facility hallway as well as facility’s carbon monoxide detector, both of which were found to be in proper working order. Based on the evidence gathered, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED. A finding that the complaint allegation is UNFOUNDED means that the allegation was without a reasonable basis. Therefore, the allegation dismissed. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099 was discussed and provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250313151448
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2025
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator has informed LPA a Maintenance technician will be visiting the facility 3/19/25. Administrator has agreed to submit proof to LPA once sink has been repaired.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2025
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. Based on observation and interview, the Administrator did not comply with Maintenance and Operation by not repairing resident sink in a timely manner, which poses a potential health, safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator has informed LPA a Maintenance technician will be visiting the facility 3/19/25. Administrator has agreed to submit proof to LPA once sink has been repaired.
Mar 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a Health and Safety check. LPA met with Administrator Marsie Marcos, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility. LPA observed a smoke alarm detached from its mount. Although the smoke alarm is detached from its mount, it is functional. The LPA proceeded to test another smoke alarm in facility hallway and facility’s carbon monoxide detector, both of which were found to be in proper working order. LPA observed Administrator and staff attempting to mount smoke alarm back in place, however they were unsuccessful. LPA provided a Technical Violation, Administrator informed LPA a new smoke alarm will be purchased and mounted. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy of this safety report along with LIC 9102 was provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025
Feb 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained serious injury due to staff neglect Facility staff did not provide assistance in meeting resident's medical needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Administrator Marsie Marcos and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation involved interviews and records review. The allegation alleged that a resident (R1) sustained serious injury due to staff neglect. After a comprehensive review of medical records, interviews with facility staff, outside parties, it was determined that R1 arrived at Rose Valley Redlands II on August 6, 2024, and had two reported falls subsequently. The treating Orthopedic Surgeon estimated the fracture treated on September 23, 2024, was approximately two months old, indicating it occurred before R1 placement at Rose Valley Redlands II. Therefore, it cannot be conclusively demonstrated that the fracture happened at this facility or resulted from staff neglect. Unsubstantiated The allegation alleged Facility staff did not provide assistance in meeting resident's medical needs. Administrator clarified that R1 received care from Innovage PACE, which manages all transportation to medical appointments. It was reported that R1 sustained an elbow skin injury on September 3, 2024, after an overnight home visit. Administrator promptly contacted Innovage for medical treatment. R1 was treated on September 5, 2024. Records show that R1’s elbow fracture was diagnosed by September 9, 2024, and was seen by a Nurse Practitioner on September 19, 2024. Therefore, the alleged allegations have been determined Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed, and a copy was provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240925161927
Feb 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are financially abusing resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Marsie Marcos and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff are financially abusing resident, LPA interviewed 5 residents. 3 out of 5 residents informed LPA their families handle their finances and no one in the facility has access, 2 out of 5 residents informed LPA they handle their own finances. R1 was not interviewed due to no longer living at the facility. LPA interviewed 3 staff. 3 out of 3 staff informed LPA they do not handle resident’s finances. Administrator informed LPA they never safeguard cash or cards for residents, if residents need anything they notify or call their responsible parties. Administrator stated they never had possession of R1's cards, R1's belongings were never opened. Unsubstantiated Based on LPAs observations, record review, and interviews, the above allegation is Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy was provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241001084826
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Marsie Marcos, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (9), a current census of (8). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in two (2) resident bathrooms measured between 114.8 and 116 degrees F. Five (5) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, facility license, administrator certificate, activity schedule, personal rights, facility sketch, emergency disaster plan and telephone numbers, menu, CCLD complaint poster, and Ombudsman poster. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining area are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked cabinet. Record Review: Three (3) Staff files reviewed were observed to be complete. Four (4) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations and record review no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2024
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Nov 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Marsie Marcos, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). License capacity of (9) with a current census of (9). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no bodies of water accessible to residents in care. The facility is enclosed with self-latching gates. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Resident’s bathrooms were operating in safe and sanitary conditions. The hot water temperature in residents' bathrooms measured at 105 degrees F. Resident’s bedrooms have sufficient lighting and furniture in good repair. Facility has operating carbon monoxide alarms and telephone service. The facility has sufficient linen, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, disaster evacuation plan and emergency telephone numbers. Food Service: Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. The refrigerator and freezer are operating in a healthful manner. Pesticides and other cleaning solutions were kept locked and stored away from food areas. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour care staff. Staff working have California criminal record clearances or exemptions. Medical Related Services: All medication is centrally stored and kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Record Review: The Administrator's certification expires on 5/22/2024. (3) staff files were reviewed. LPA observed the facility did not maintain verification of job training on file for staff #1 (S1), including verification of S1's Dementia Care training. (3) resident files were reviewed. LPA observed the facility did not maintain a complete appraisal which includes a resident's functional capabilities on file for resident #1 (R1) and resident #2 (R2). Based on observations and record review, deficiencies are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. Licensing reports (LIC809/LIC809-D/LIC9102) were discussed with the Administrator. Copies of the Licensing reports with appeal rights were provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023
The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Nov 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced case management visit to the facility. LPA met with Marsie Marcos, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA visited the facility to amend report LIC809-D that was previously issued on 11/13/2023. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of the report was provide to the Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023
Earlier years2023 · 1 document
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jan 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Paola Guerrero made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required annual inspection, with an emphasis on infection control due to the COVID-19 pandemic. LPA met with Facility Administrator Marsie Marcos and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were three (3) staff, and six (6) residents present and three (3) residents attending day program. LPA toured the facility inside and out and went over COVID-19 best practices for infection control and prevention with Marsie. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing Division guidelines for COVID-19 testing, isolating/quarantining clients and properly caring for clients with COVID-19 positive results and/or exposures. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the proper use and disposal of PPE. The entrance of the facility has a check in process for visitors that includes a temperature check and a symptom check. The clients have hand sanitizer available to them throughout the facility, and the bathrooms were stocked with hand soap and paper towels. The facility has postings throughout the facility for proper cough etiquette, proper hand washing procedure, and/or social distancing guidelines. LPA requested to inspect the facility's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supply, located in Livingroom area. The facility has a full thirty (30) day supply of PPE items such as gloves, face shields, gowns, disinfectant, surgical masks, N95 masks, and hand sanitizer. All clients and staff are practicing all other COVID-19 precautions, which minimize the risk of them contracting COVID-19. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Marsie Marcos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2023
6 of 9 beds were occupied at the December 2, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Dm Farview LLC, licensed since 2018.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 12
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 1 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Rose Valley Redlands II
Is Rose Valley Redlands II licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Rose Valley Redlands II licensed for?
9 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Rose Valley Redlands II been cited?
1 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.
Is Rose Valley Redlands II still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Rose Valley Redlands II cost?
$5,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,100–$6,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redlands that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,050 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Rose Valley Redlands II take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Dm Farview LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Redlands Community Hospital is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Rose Valley Redlands II keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Rose Valley Redlands II license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ROSE VALLEY REDLANDS II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #361880517. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 9 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Dm Farview LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 12 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is December 12, 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Bernardino County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$2,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $2,200–$3,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,000–$4,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,400On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Bernardino County