Green Field Haven is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in North Highlands, Sacramento County, California — state license #347003494, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Green Field Haven

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · North Highlands, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #347003494, held since 2007 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3620 Winona Way · North Highlands, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 482-1314
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OVER 60 YEARS OF AGE. ALL RESIDENTS SHALL RESIDE IN SOUTH END OF HOUSE ONLY. BEDROOMS # 1 &5 FOR STAFF ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR (4) ON FILE.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 8, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
April 8, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 1, 2024 to April 8, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not keep the facility free from infestation 2. Staff mishandled a resident's medication 3. Staff did not meet a resident's oxygen needs 4. Staff did not timely address a resident's change in medical condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced visit to deliver the findings for the allegations above. 1. LPA interviewed staff and residents. Licensee stated when the weather was hot there was an issue with roaches coming into the facility. Licensee stated she put out traps and that stopped the roaches from coming into the facility. LPA was informed there was an issue with the toilet in one of the bathrooms and a few roaches were found until the toilet was fixed and that was only one time. The person stated the toilet was fixed quickly. LPA did not observe any roaches, rodents, or bugs in the facility during today's visit and on 03/11/2026. LPA cannot confirm or deny the facility was infested based on the above and observations. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251231114722
Apr 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed several UTI's while in care due to staff neglect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived at the facility to deliver the finding of the allegation above. LPA met with Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit. For the allegation of, Resident developed several UTI's while in care due to staff neglect, based on an interview conducted with the Administrator, it was revealed that only one resident (R1) in care has had a recent urinary tract infection. The interview revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility with a catheter and has home health coming to the facility twice a week. The facility assists with catheter draining but is unable and not trained to clean the urinary tube. An interview conducted with the caregiver revealed that the caregiver assists with draining R1’s catheter bag as needed. R1 often tugs and pulls on the catheter, and once disconnected, then home health is contacted for the tube to be reinserted. Based on the information provided, the allegation is unsubstantiated. As a result of this investigathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250919154608
Apr 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs. Staff are not allowing resident to use the phone

Amend: To make Public- On October 1, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint #59-AS-20240802154406. LPA met with Larisa Kononov, Licensee, and informed her the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint alleging staff are not meeting resident’s hygiene needs and staff are not allowing resident to use the phone. LPA interviewed all staff (3) and 2 witnesses and a resident. LPA reviewed medical documents of the resident and facility files. According to all staff, Resident #1 (R1) is incontinent. LPA verified R1’s condition with the physician’s report. The Licensee states R1 receives 2 to 3 showers a day due to R1’s medical condition. R1 told LPA, R1 doesn’t want to visit with their family. R1 stated the facility is talking good care of him and gets showers and shaves daily. R1 also said when their family comes to visit, R1 doesn’t make eye contact or speak with their family. ALLEGATION UFOUNDED. To cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240802154406
Oct 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are overmedicating resident in care. Licensee does not ensure that resident(s) are provided with activities while in care. Staff limit visitations with resident in care.

Amend: to make public-On October 1, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint # 59-AS-0815091717. LPA met with Larisa Kovonov, Administrator and informed her the reason for the visit. The department received a complaint alleging facility staff are over medicating resident while in care, Licensee does not ensure that resident(s) are provided with activities while in care and Staff limits visitations with resident in care. During the investigation process interviews and a records review was initiated. LPA reviewed R1s medical documentation and physician report and needs and services plan. R1’s son is the Power of Attorney. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff are over medicating resident while in care.” LPA reviewed R1s PRN Medication Records and medical provider’s medication list. Documents obtained show that all current medications were administered and logged correctly for R1, per their doctor’s orders. Intervithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240815091717
Mar 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints0typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file14typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2007.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202623020254402024230202311020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 482-1314

Is Green Field Haven licensed?

Yes — Green Field Haven is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in North Highlands (Sacramento County): California license #347003494, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 8, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Green Field Haven care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Green Field Haven with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OVER 60 YEARS OF AGE. ALL RESIDENTS SHALL RESIDE IN SOUTH END OF HOUSE ONLY. BEDROOMS # 1 &5 FOR STAFF ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR (4) ON FILE.

How much does Green Field Haven cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Green Field Haven's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Green Field Haven accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Green Field Haven is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on April 8, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Green Field Haven?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2021 for Green Field Haven; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 8, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not keep the facility free from infestation 2. Staff mishandled a resident's medication 3. Staff did not meet a resident's oxygen needs 4. Staff did not timely address a resident's change in medical condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced visit to deliver the findings for the allegations above. 1. LPA interviewed staff and residents. Licensee stated when the weather was hot there was an issue with roaches coming into the facility. Licensee stated she put out traps and that stopped the roaches from coming into the facility. LPA was informed there was an issue with the toilet in one of the bathrooms and a few roaches were found until the toilet was fixed and that was only one time. The person stated the toilet was fixed quickly. LPA did not observe any roaches, rodents, or bugs in the facility during today's visit and on 03/11/2026. LPA cannot confirm or deny the facility was infested based on the above and observations. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 8, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251231114722

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident developed several UTI's while in care due to staff neglect.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived at the facility to deliver the finding of the allegation above. LPA met with Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit. For the allegation of, Resident developed several UTI's while in care due to staff neglect, based on an interview conducted with the Administrator, it was revealed that only one resident (R1) in care has had a recent urinary tract infection. The interview revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility with a catheter and has home health coming to the facility twice a week. The facility assists with catheter draining but is unable and not trained to clean the urinary tube. An interview conducted with the caregiver revealed that the caregiver assists with draining R1’s catheter bag as needed. R1 often tugs and pulls on the catheter, and once disconnected, then home health is contacted for the tube to be reinserted. Based on the information provided, the allegation is unsubstantiated. As a result of this investigaCDSS inspection report, October 14, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250919154608

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs. Staff are not allowing resident to use the phone
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Amend: To make Public- On October 1, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint #59-AS-20240802154406. LPA met with Larisa Kononov, Licensee, and informed her the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint alleging staff are not meeting resident’s hygiene needs and staff are not allowing resident to use the phone. LPA interviewed all staff (3) and 2 witnesses and a resident. LPA reviewed medical documents of the resident and facility files. According to all staff, Resident #1 (R1) is incontinent. LPA verified R1’s condition with the physician’s report. The Licensee states R1 receives 2 to 3 showers a day due to R1’s medical condition. R1 told LPA, R1 doesn’t want to visit with their family. R1 stated the facility is talking good care of him and gets showers and shaves daily. R1 also said when their family comes to visit, R1 doesn’t make eye contact or speak with their family. ALLEGATION UFOUNDED. To cCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240802154406
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are overmedicating resident in care. Licensee does not ensure that resident(s) are provided with activities while in care. Staff limit visitations with resident in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Amend: to make public-On October 1, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint # 59-AS-0815091717. LPA met with Larisa Kovonov, Administrator and informed her the reason for the visit. The department received a complaint alleging facility staff are over medicating resident while in care, Licensee does not ensure that resident(s) are provided with activities while in care and Staff limits visitations with resident in care. During the investigation process interviews and a records review was initiated. LPA reviewed R1s medical documentation and physician report and needs and services plan. R1’s son is the Power of Attorney. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff are over medicating resident while in care.” LPA reviewed R1s PRN Medication Records and medical provider’s medication list. Documents obtained show that all current medications were administered and logged correctly for R1, per their doctor’s orders. InterviCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240815091717

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 482-1314
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Green Field Haven? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.