Meraki Of Sacramento is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #347000008, licensed for 12 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated July 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

Meraki Of Sacramento

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 12 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careBedriddenHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #347000008, held since 1994 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4941 Tyler Street · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 348-9316
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 12 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE 60 AND ABOVE. APPROVED FOR UP TO 12 NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS OF WHICH 3 MAY BE ON HOSPICE. MAY HAVE 1 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT IN RM #5.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the October 24, 2025 visit
11 of 12 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 26, 2023 to October 24, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in soiled diaper for a period of time.

On 10/24/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Administrator. LPA conducted records review , observation and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Records found that R1 had limited communication ability, incontinenece care needs and was dependent for transfers. Interview with R1 found that no specific incidents, dates or times could be identified where incontinece needs were not met. Staff interviews found that R1 frequently called for assistance by call button or shouting out and, at some of those times, called for incontinence care and was found to not have been incontinent. Report continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250917083432
Oct 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that resident's incontinence needs are being met.

On 12/12/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Samantha Shaw, Administrator to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. It was reported by a witness that on 10/25/24 a outside agency came to the facility to assess R1 and found R1 to have been incontinent and have wet bedding. LPA conducted a complaint investigation visit on 10/30/24 and found R1’s room to have a strong smell of urine. R1 records state that R1 experiences incontinence, has communication deficits, weakness and uses a wheelchair with assistance to transfer. The Appraisal Needs and Services Plan does not identify the incontinence management plan. Interview with caregiver on 10/30/24 found staff does not have a clear understanding of R1’s pattern of incontinence episodes or to have a clearly defined toileting schedule. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241025151136
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints3typical 1
State visits on file18typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1994.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025440202489120232212022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 348-9316

Is Meraki Of Sacramento licensed?

Yes — Meraki Of Sacramento is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #347000008, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 12 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Meraki Of Sacramento care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Meraki Of Sacramento with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and bedridden; it does not list hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE 60 AND ABOVE. APPROVED FOR UP TO 12 NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS OF WHICH 3 MAY BE ON HOSPICE. MAY HAVE 1 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT IN RM #5.

How much does Meraki Of Sacramento cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Meraki Of Sacramento's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Meraki Of Sacramento accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Meraki Of Sacramento is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

11 of 12 beds occupied (92%) when the state visited on October 24, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Meraki Of Sacramento?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2022 for Meraki Of Sacramento; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 24, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident in soiled diaper for a period of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/24/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Administrator. LPA conducted records review , observation and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Records found that R1 had limited communication ability, incontinenece care needs and was dependent for transfers. Interview with R1 found that no specific incidents, dates or times could be identified where incontinece needs were not met. Staff interviews found that R1 frequently called for assistance by call button or shouting out and, at some of those times, called for incontinence care and was found to not have been incontinent. Report continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250917083432

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not ensuring that resident's incontinence needs are being met.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/12/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Samantha Shaw, Administrator to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. It was reported by a witness that on 10/25/24 a outside agency came to the facility to assess R1 and found R1 to have been incontinent and have wet bedding. LPA conducted a complaint investigation visit on 10/30/24 and found R1’s room to have a strong smell of urine. R1 records state that R1 experiences incontinence, has communication deficits, weakness and uses a wheelchair with assistance to transfer. The Appraisal Needs and Services Plan does not identify the incontinence management plan. Interview with caregiver on 10/30/24 found staff does not have a clear understanding of R1’s pattern of incontinence episodes or to have a clearly defined toileting schedule. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241025151136

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was hit by another resident in care. Resident was left on floor for an extended period of time.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On January 26, 2023, at 12pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to investigate allegations above. LPA spoke with Darius Stir , Administrator, informed him the reason for the visit. Prior to the visit, LPA completed the required COVID-19 testing protocols, a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19; and completed a facility risK assessment. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and wore a mask for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). During todays visit, LPA interviewed the administrator and documented the interview. Based on LPAs interview with the Administrator who admitted the allgeation were true, the preponderance of evidence standards has been met, therefore, the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. To continue see 9099-C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 26, 2023 · control 25-AS-20221201131440

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 348-9316
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Meraki Of Sacramento? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.