Legacy Lane Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701414, licensed for 14 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated June 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Legacy Lane Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 14 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701414, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7610 La Mancha Way · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(564) 200-1736
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 14 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 1 resident
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 14 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 14 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 9, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

Most recent state visit
June 9, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
11 of 14 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 13, 2025 to June 9, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 20 of 20 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify residents authorized representative of an incident Staff left resident in soiled clothing Staff did not ensure resident wore protective helmet Staff are not communicating with resident's authorized representative regarding appointments Staff are not managing resident's pain Staff did not ensure the facility was kept clean Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs

On 06/09/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee conducted an unannounced facility visit to initiate and conclude a complaint investigation. LPA Lee met with care givers Pene Henefiro and Merewalesi Qalikaisi. The facility census was eleven residents, with two staff members present at the time of the visit. A phone interview was conducted with facility administrator Isikeli Tuikenatabua. It was alleged that staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of an incident, staff left a resident in soiled clothing, staff did not ensure resident wore a protective helmet, staff are not communicating with the resident's authorized representative regarding appointments, staff are not managing resident's pain, staff did not ensure the facility was kept clean and staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs. The investigation consisted of record reviews and interviews with Administrator Tuikenatabua and the Reporting Party (RP). Based on a review of the resident roster, it wasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260604100942
May 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202511 state visits · 13 documents
Dec 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff hit resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez conducted an unannounced complaint inspection with the above facility on December 19, 2025, at 12:15 PM and met with Administrator Isikeli Tuikenatabua. The purpose of the inspection is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. Based on complaint investigation interviews and records reviewed, it was determined that there was not sufficient evidence to prove that a facility staff member hit resident 1 (R1). Confidential interviews were conducted with eight individuals during the period of November 13, 2025, to December 04, 2025. continued... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251110133553
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to report suspected sexual abuse of a resident Staff did not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met

On 12/4/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cynthia Tamayo and Avelina Martinez arrived unannounced to conduct a complete and deliver complaint investigation findings into an allegations noted above. LPA met with administrator, Isikeli Tuikenatabua (S2), and stated the purpose of this visit. LPA requested the following records for review: • LIC 500 • LIC 9020 • LIC 308 Allegation: Staff failed to report suspected sexual abuse of a resident It was alleged that Staff failed to report suspected sexual abuse of a resident The investigation into the above allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. CONTINUED ON 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250919152014
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: ) Staff handled resident roughly. 2) Unlawful eviction.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo made an unannounced inspection to the Legacy Lane RCFE on 6/13/25 at 8:57 A.M. to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Tamayo met with staff, Isikeli Tuikenatabua and together discussed the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. Six residents (R1-R6) and four staff members (S1-S4) were interviewed. LPA Tamayo reviewed six residents' (R1 and R6) files. According to Rebecca Danenberg’s (R1) admission agreement, dated 2/5/24 R1's LIC 602 diagnosed R1 with Paraplegia and Venous insufficient. Cognitive deficits were identified for R1 include hypertension, anxiety, and PTSD. Substance abuse problem identified on LIC 602 for R1. R1 was identified as non-ambulatory, which means that the resident should be able to turn, rotate, and/or reposition themselves in bed and assistance with dressing is needed. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250311084847
Jun 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints4typical 1
State visits on file21typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025111312024440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $5,000–$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (564) 200-1736

Is Legacy Lane Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Legacy Lane Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701414, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 14 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 9, 2026, was marked “Unfounded” by the state.

Can Legacy Lane Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Legacy Lane Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 14 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 14 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.

How much does Legacy Lane Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Legacy Lane Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Legacy Lane Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Legacy Lane Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

11 of 14 beds occupied (79%) when the state visited on June 9, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Legacy Lane Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2024 for Legacy Lane Senior Living; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 9, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify residents authorized representative of an incident Staff left resident in soiled clothing Staff did not ensure resident wore protective helmet Staff are not communicating with resident's authorized representative regarding appointments Staff are not managing resident's pain Staff did not ensure the facility was kept clean Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 06/09/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee conducted an unannounced facility visit to initiate and conclude a complaint investigation. LPA Lee met with care givers Pene Henefiro and Merewalesi Qalikaisi. The facility census was eleven residents, with two staff members present at the time of the visit. A phone interview was conducted with facility administrator Isikeli Tuikenatabua. It was alleged that staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of an incident, staff left a resident in soiled clothing, staff did not ensure resident wore a protective helmet, staff are not communicating with the resident's authorized representative regarding appointments, staff are not managing resident's pain, staff did not ensure the facility was kept clean and staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs. The investigation consisted of record reviews and interviews with Administrator Tuikenatabua and the Reporting Party (RP). Based on a review of the resident roster, it was— CDSS inspection report, June 9, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260604100942

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff hit resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez conducted an unannounced complaint inspection with the above facility on December 19, 2025, at 12:15 PM and met with Administrator Isikeli Tuikenatabua. The purpose of the inspection is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. Based on complaint investigation interviews and records reviewed, it was determined that there was not sufficient evidence to prove that a facility staff member hit resident 1 (R1). Confidential interviews were conducted with eight individuals during the period of November 13, 2025, to December 04, 2025. continued... Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, December 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251110133553
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to report suspected sexual abuse of a resident Staff did not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/4/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cynthia Tamayo and Avelina Martinez arrived unannounced to conduct a complete and deliver complaint investigation findings into an allegations noted above. LPA met with administrator, Isikeli Tuikenatabua (S2), and stated the purpose of this visit. LPA requested the following records for review: • LIC 500 • LIC 9020 • LIC 308 Allegation: Staff failed to report suspected sexual abuse of a resident It was alleged that Staff failed to report suspected sexual abuse of a resident The investigation into the above allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. CONTINUED ON 9099-C Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, December 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250919152014
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed) Staff handled resident roughly. 2) Unlawful eviction.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo made an unannounced inspection to the Legacy Lane RCFE on 6/13/25 at 8:57 A.M. to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Tamayo met with staff, Isikeli Tuikenatabua and together discussed the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. Six residents (R1-R6) and four staff members (S1-S4) were interviewed. LPA Tamayo reviewed six residents' (R1 and R6) files. According to Rebecca Danenberg’s (R1) admission agreement, dated 2/5/24 R1's LIC 602 diagnosed R1 with Paraplegia and Venous insufficient. Cognitive deficits were identified for R1 include hypertension, anxiety, and PTSD. Substance abuse problem identified on LIC 602 for R1. R1 was identified as non-ambulatory, which means that the resident should be able to turn, rotate, and/or reposition themselves in bed and assistance with dressing is needed. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubsta— CDSS inspection report, June 13, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250311084847

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Legacy Lane Senior Living?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Legacy Lane Senior Living Llc, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(564) 200-1736
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Legacy Lane Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.