Ivy Ridge Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701234, licensed for 36 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 34 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated May 14, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Ivy Ridge Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 36 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701234, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2030 23rd St · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 600-3309
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 36 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 4 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 36 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 40 times and filed 34 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 14, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 14, 2026
Occupancy at the February 12, 2025 visit
33 of 36 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 18, 2023 to February 12, 2025. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 30 of 34 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 8 documents
Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner. Staff not preventing resident’s sleep from being disturbed by another resident. Staff is retaliating against resident. Staff not providing resident with meals in a timely manner.

On 02/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with assistant administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 33. It was reported that the facility staff did not assist a resident in a timely manner. The investigation involved interviews with staff, residents, and a review of records. LPA Lee interviewed 6 out of 7 residents who stated that they had no concerns about staff not assisting residents promptly. Additionally, these 6 residents reported they had not witnessed any falls where a resident was left unattended by staff. They also shared that they feel safe living in the facility. LPA Lee also interviewed 2 staff member and it was learned that Resident 1 (R1) experienced an unwitnessed fall in the bathroom. However, R1 was assisted promptly by care staff who heard the fall. Thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241217105430
Feb 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not provide a safe environment for residents. Facility staff do not provide a comfortable environment for residents. Facility does not have sufficient number of bathrooms to meet residents need. Facility shower is in disrepair. Facility does not provide comfortable temperature for residents.

On 02/04/25 at 2:38 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with assistant administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 33. It was alleged that the facility staff did not provide a safe environment for residents. The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, and an outside agency, as well as observations. Of the residents interviewed, 6 out of 7 reported no concerns about the facility’s safety. These 6 residents expressed that they feel safe living in the facility. Additionally, 6 out of 7 of the residents interviewed reported not seeing other residents enter another resident’s room without permission. Four facility staff members denied the allegations, stating that they communicate daily about residents' needs. The outside agency also found no concerns regarding ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241125080927
202410 state visits · 11 documents
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handle resident in rough manner while in care. Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care. Resident is sustaining unexplained injuries while in care. Facility freezer is in disrepair. Licensee is not addressing bed bug infestation at the facility. Staff stole from resident in care.

On 12/17/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with assistant administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 34. A brief interview with conducted with administrator Lezel. An allegation was made that staff handle residents in a rough manner while in care and staff speak inappropriately to residents. The investigation included a review of records and interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 7 out of 7 residents, who each stated that they are not being handled in a rough manner and spoken to inappropriately by facility staff. Additionally, LPA Lee interviewed another individual from an outside agency, who reported not witnessing any instances of residents being handled roughly or spoken to inappropriately. Continued LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241003083728
Nov 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is encouraging staff to falsify documentation regarding residents in care. Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided with activities while in care.

On 11/07/2024 at 10:22 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 35. A brief interview with Lezel was conducted. It was alleged that licensee is encouraging staff to falsify documentation regarding resident’s care. This investigation consisted of records review and interview with facility staff. To investigate, LPA Lee conducted a review of resident records and interviewed facility staff. LPA Lee reviewed the files of five residents and found no indication to show that the facility staff falsified resident documentation regarding their care. 5 out 5 residents were interviewed to compare resident services to what was written on documentation. LPA found no discrepancies between the care that was provided stated by residents tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240814165808
Oct 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction. Staff did not ensure the shower was not in disrepair.

On October 9, 2024, at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Lee met with Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit: to deliver findings regarding the allegations mentioned above. The current resident census is 35. A brief interview was conducted with Administrator Assistant Lezel Bello. The department investigated the complaint alleging an unlawful eviction and alleging that staff did not ensure the shower was not in despair. The investigation revealed that Resident 1 (R1) received an eviction letter on August 1, 2024, due to frequent non-emergency calls made through the pull cord system and the main office phone line. R1 had moved into the facility on July 15, 2024. Records from the Emergency Call Log indicate that from July 15 to July 31, 2024, R1 activated the call system 26 times. The admission agreement and house rules do not specify a limit on call usage. Furthermore, R1 did not violate anthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240730114922
Oct 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly store medications.

On 10/1/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong arrived unannounced to deliver the findings for complaint received on 6/19/2023. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on records review, and staff and resident interviews, there is a preponderance of evidence that staff did not properly store medications. It was observed by the Department staff that medications were accessible to residents. It was learned that facility staff stored prescription medications to be administered throughout the day in a cart to save time from returning to the Medication Room on the second floor to obtain the medications. Although the cart was locked, facility staff and the administrator corroborated to the Department staff that a spare key was kept on top of the cart in a pen container and was easily assessable to anyone in the lobby, such athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20230619115335
Sep 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure facility is free of pest.

On 08/28/2024 at 11:09 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to opened and delivered the complaint. The current census is 36. A brief interview with conducted with Administrator Hong Trinh. Allegation: Staff did not ensure facility is free of pest. It was alleged that staff did not ensure facility is free of pest. This investigation consisted of observations, interviews with staff and residents and records reviewed. Based on facility visits on 08/05/2024, 08/19/2024 and today’s visit 08/28/2024, LPA Lee did not observe any pest in the facility. LPA Lee interviewed 5 facility staff who denied the allegation and stated they have not seen any pest in the facility since the facility start services with pest control. LPA Lee also interviewed 7 out of 10 residents who stated they have not observed any rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240821100429
Aug 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide clean linens for resident in care. Facility staff did not provide adequate laundry service to resident in care.

On 08/28/2024 at 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 36. A brief interview with conducted with Administrator Hong Trinh. Allegations: Facility staff did not provide clean linens for resident in care and facility staff did not provide adequate laundry service to resident in care. It was alleged that facility staff did not provide clean linens for resident in care and that facility staff did not provide adequate laundry service to resident in care. This investigation consisted of observations, interviews with staff and residents and records reviewed. Based on facility visits on 08/05/2024, 08/19/2024 and today’s visit 08/28/2024, LPA Lee observed facility staff doing laundry. Continued LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240801135600
Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have an administrator. Staff does not maintain a resident's room in an organized and clean fashion. Facility has pests.

On 02/21/2024 at 12:57 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Med-Tech Tanisha Linzy and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 28. A brief interview with conducted with designated staff Hong Trinh via telephone. Allegation: Facility does not have an administrator. It was alleged that the facility does not have an administrator. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents who confirm that they don’t know and have never seen administrator Sunnie Kitnikone. In addition, 10 out of 10 residents referred Zoe and Lezel as the administrator to the facility. On 01/26/2024 licensee Pak Wu admitted that Sunnie Kitnikone is a friend of his, who also owns her own residential facility. Licensee explained that Sunnie Kitnikone was addedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240123145354
Feb 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not maintain resident’s hygiene.

On 02/02/2024 at 1:37 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with care staff Ernie Inductivo and explained the purpose of the visit. Care staff called designated person in charge, Hong Trinh, who stated she won't be able to join the visit. LPA Lee explained the purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above to both Hong Trinh and Ernie Inductivo. The census is 29. Allegation: Staff did not maintain residents’ hygiene. It was alleged that staff did not maintain residents’ hygiene. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, observations, interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 9 out of 9 residents and 7 out of 9 residents have no concerns with staff not maintaining residents’ hygiene. On 12/14/2023 during a complaint investigation LPA Lee observed 10 residents in the common area and the 10 residents appeared to look clean. Continued LIC 9009-C Unsubstthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231208105830
20239 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not keep the facility free of pest. staff does not maintain the facility in clean and sanitary condition.

On 12/14/2023 at 8:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with House Manager Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to open and deliver complaint finding for the allegations above. The current census is 26 with 2 caregivers, 1 med-tech, 1 cook, 1 house manager and 1 maintenance staff present. At 2:45 PM, both Licensee Pak Wu and Licensee/administrator Hong Trinh arrived to the facility. Allegation: Staff does not keep the facility free of pest. It was alleged that staff does not keep the facility free of pest. This investigation consisted of observations, records reviewed, interviews with staffs, residents, and the resident family member. At 9:16 AM, LPA Lee toured resident 1 (R1) room. It was observed that (R1) mattress and bed sheets had numerous bed buds. LPA Lee also observed multiple bedbugs on the carpet in (R1) room. Furthermore, LPA Lee interviewed 12 rethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231204130717
Dec 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not assisting resident with bathing Facility staff are not assisting resident with personal care Staff are not providing adequate food service to resident(s)

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong conducted an unannounced facility visit to complete and deliver findings for a complaint investigation received on 9/8/23. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on record reviews, and staff and resident interviews, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations mentioned above. LPA interviewed resident R1, R1 corroborated that facility staff do provide adequate food services but stated that food tasted “pretty bad”. R1 stated that staff do assist R1 with bathing once a week and personal hygiene needs. R1 stated that she can do her own grooming and doesn’t expect staff to do it for her. Based on staff interviews, staff stated that they do assist resident R1 with bathing and personal hygiene needs. Staff reported that R1 has no skin issues or bed sores. Continued on 909the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230908102235
Nov 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations9typical 1
Substantiated complaints17typical 2
Total complaints19typical 7
State visits on file40typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025880202410113202313131
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 600-3309

Is Ivy Ridge Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Ivy Ridge Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701234, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 36 residents. State records list 34 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 14, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ivy Ridge Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Ridge Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 36 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

How much does Ivy Ridge Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Ridge Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Ridge Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Ivy Ridge Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Sacramento County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

33 of 36 beds occupied (92%) when the state visited on February 12, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Ridge Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 40 state visits and 34 dated documents since 2023 for Ivy Ridge Assisted Living; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 12, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident in a timely manner. Staff not preventing resident’s sleep from being disturbed by another resident. Staff is retaliating against resident. Staff not providing resident with meals in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/12/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with assistant administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 33. It was reported that the facility staff did not assist a resident in a timely manner. The investigation involved interviews with staff, residents, and a review of records. LPA Lee interviewed 6 out of 7 residents who stated that they had no concerns about staff not assisting residents promptly. Additionally, these 6 residents reported they had not witnessed any falls where a resident was left unattended by staff. They also shared that they feel safe living in the facility. LPA Lee also interviewed 2 staff member and it was learned that Resident 1 (R1) experienced an unwitnessed fall in the bathroom. However, R1 was assisted promptly by care staff who heard the fall. TheCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241217105430
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not provide a safe environment for residents. Facility staff do not provide a comfortable environment for residents. Facility does not have sufficient number of bathrooms to meet residents need. Facility shower is in disrepair. Facility does not provide comfortable temperature for residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/04/25 at 2:38 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with assistant administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 33. It was alleged that the facility staff did not provide a safe environment for residents. The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, and an outside agency, as well as observations. Of the residents interviewed, 6 out of 7 reported no concerns about the facility’s safety. These 6 residents expressed that they feel safe living in the facility. Additionally, 6 out of 7 of the residents interviewed reported not seeing other residents enter another resident’s room without permission. Four facility staff members denied the allegations, stating that they communicate daily about residents' needs. The outside agency also found no concerns regarding thCDSS inspection report, February 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241125080927

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handle resident in rough manner while in care. Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care. Resident is sustaining unexplained injuries while in care. Facility freezer is in disrepair. Licensee is not addressing bed bug infestation at the facility. Staff stole from resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/17/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with assistant administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 34. A brief interview with conducted with administrator Lezel. An allegation was made that staff handle residents in a rough manner while in care and staff speak inappropriately to residents. The investigation included a review of records and interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 7 out of 7 residents, who each stated that they are not being handled in a rough manner and spoken to inappropriately by facility staff. Additionally, LPA Lee interviewed another individual from an outside agency, who reported not witnessing any instances of residents being handled roughly or spoken to inappropriately. Continued LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241003083728
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is encouraging staff to falsify documentation regarding residents in care. Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided with activities while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/07/2024 at 10:22 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 35. A brief interview with Lezel was conducted. It was alleged that licensee is encouraging staff to falsify documentation regarding resident’s care. This investigation consisted of records review and interview with facility staff. To investigate, LPA Lee conducted a review of resident records and interviewed facility staff. LPA Lee reviewed the files of five residents and found no indication to show that the facility staff falsified resident documentation regarding their care. 5 out 5 residents were interviewed to compare resident services to what was written on documentation. LPA found no discrepancies between the care that was provided stated by residents tCDSS inspection report, November 7, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240814165808
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful eviction. Staff did not ensure the shower was not in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On October 9, 2024, at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Lee met with Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit: to deliver findings regarding the allegations mentioned above. The current resident census is 35. A brief interview was conducted with Administrator Assistant Lezel Bello. The department investigated the complaint alleging an unlawful eviction and alleging that staff did not ensure the shower was not in despair. The investigation revealed that Resident 1 (R1) received an eviction letter on August 1, 2024, due to frequent non-emergency calls made through the pull cord system and the main office phone line. R1 had moved into the facility on July 15, 2024. Records from the Emergency Call Log indicate that from July 15 to July 31, 2024, R1 activated the call system 26 times. The admission agreement and house rules do not specify a limit on call usage. Furthermore, R1 did not violate anCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240730114922
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly store medications.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/1/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong arrived unannounced to deliver the findings for complaint received on 6/19/2023. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on records review, and staff and resident interviews, there is a preponderance of evidence that staff did not properly store medications. It was observed by the Department staff that medications were accessible to residents. It was learned that facility staff stored prescription medications to be administered throughout the day in a cart to save time from returning to the Medication Room on the second floor to obtain the medications. Although the cart was locked, facility staff and the administrator corroborated to the Department staff that a spare key was kept on top of the cart in a pen container and was easily assessable to anyone in the lobby, such aCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20230619115335
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure facility is free of pest.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/28/2024 at 11:09 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to opened and delivered the complaint. The current census is 36. A brief interview with conducted with Administrator Hong Trinh. Allegation: Staff did not ensure facility is free of pest. It was alleged that staff did not ensure facility is free of pest. This investigation consisted of observations, interviews with staff and residents and records reviewed. Based on facility visits on 08/05/2024, 08/19/2024 and today’s visit 08/28/2024, LPA Lee did not observe any pest in the facility. LPA Lee interviewed 5 facility staff who denied the allegation and stated they have not seen any pest in the facility since the facility start services with pest control. LPA Lee also interviewed 7 out of 10 residents who stated they have not observed any rCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240821100429
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide clean linens for resident in care. Facility staff did not provide adequate laundry service to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/28/2024 at 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 36. A brief interview with conducted with Administrator Hong Trinh. Allegations: Facility staff did not provide clean linens for resident in care and facility staff did not provide adequate laundry service to resident in care. It was alleged that facility staff did not provide clean linens for resident in care and that facility staff did not provide adequate laundry service to resident in care. This investigation consisted of observations, interviews with staff and residents and records reviewed. Based on facility visits on 08/05/2024, 08/19/2024 and today’s visit 08/28/2024, LPA Lee observed facility staff doing laundry. Continued LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240801135600
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have an administrator. Staff does not maintain a resident's room in an organized and clean fashion. Facility has pests.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 02/21/2024 at 12:57 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Med-Tech Tanisha Linzy and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 28. A brief interview with conducted with designated staff Hong Trinh via telephone. Allegation: Facility does not have an administrator. It was alleged that the facility does not have an administrator. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents who confirm that they don’t know and have never seen administrator Sunnie Kitnikone. In addition, 10 out of 10 residents referred Zoe and Lezel as the administrator to the facility. On 01/26/2024 licensee Pak Wu admitted that Sunnie Kitnikone is a friend of his, who also owns her own residential facility. Licensee explained that Sunnie Kitnikone was addedCDSS inspection report, February 22, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240123145354
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not maintain resident’s hygiene.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/02/2024 at 1:37 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with care staff Ernie Inductivo and explained the purpose of the visit. Care staff called designated person in charge, Hong Trinh, who stated she won't be able to join the visit. LPA Lee explained the purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above to both Hong Trinh and Ernie Inductivo. The census is 29. Allegation: Staff did not maintain residents’ hygiene. It was alleged that staff did not maintain residents’ hygiene. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, observations, interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 9 out of 9 residents and 7 out of 9 residents have no concerns with staff not maintaining residents’ hygiene. On 12/14/2023 during a complaint investigation LPA Lee observed 10 residents in the common area and the 10 residents appeared to look clean. Continued LIC 9009-C UnsubstCDSS inspection report, February 2, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231208105830

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not keep the facility free of pest. staff does not maintain the facility in clean and sanitary condition.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/14/2023 at 8:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with House Manager Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to open and deliver complaint finding for the allegations above. The current census is 26 with 2 caregivers, 1 med-tech, 1 cook, 1 house manager and 1 maintenance staff present. At 2:45 PM, both Licensee Pak Wu and Licensee/administrator Hong Trinh arrived to the facility. Allegation: Staff does not keep the facility free of pest. It was alleged that staff does not keep the facility free of pest. This investigation consisted of observations, records reviewed, interviews with staffs, residents, and the resident family member. At 9:16 AM, LPA Lee toured resident 1 (R1) room. It was observed that (R1) mattress and bed sheets had numerous bed buds. LPA Lee also observed multiple bedbugs on the carpet in (R1) room. Furthermore, LPA Lee interviewed 12 reCDSS inspection report, December 14, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231204130717
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not assisting resident with bathing Facility staff are not assisting resident with personal care Staff are not providing adequate food service to resident(s)
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong conducted an unannounced facility visit to complete and deliver findings for a complaint investigation received on 9/8/23. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lezel Bello and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on record reviews, and staff and resident interviews, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations mentioned above. LPA interviewed resident R1, R1 corroborated that facility staff do provide adequate food services but stated that food tasted “pretty bad”. R1 stated that staff do assist R1 with bathing once a week and personal hygiene needs. R1 stated that she can do her own grooming and doesn’t expect staff to do it for her. Based on staff interviews, staff stated that they do assist resident R1 with bathing and personal hygiene needs. Staff reported that R1 has no skin issues or bed sores. Continued on 909CDSS inspection report, November 30, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230908102235
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLack of resident supervision resulting in residents becoming lost at neighboring homes Residents are isolated in their room by staff as punishment for wandering away from the facility Staff yell at residents Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff do not treat residents wih dignity or respect
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 7/7/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver the findings for a complaint investigation. LPA met with Licensee Hong Trinh and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA Truong conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on interviews and records review, the allegations mentioned above were deemed unfounded. According to interviews conducted with residents, staff and surrounding neighbors, no one could corroborate on the allegations. No other supporting information to the allegations above was discovered. Complaint is deemed to be unfounded at this time. Continued on 9099-C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, July 7, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230428124612
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care Staff did not provide proper food service to resident in care
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 5/18/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Licensee Hong Trinh and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on interviews and records review, the allegations mentioned above were deemed unfounded. Resident (R1) corroborated that facility staff have provided medication timely and food services is adequate. LPA Truong conducted a review of R1’s MAR, Insulin MAR, and Blood Glucose Reading Log and observed that R1's did receive medication as prescribed by R1's physician. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds the allegations above to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or was without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility. UnCDSS inspection report, May 18, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230509151348

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 40 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
9
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
17
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
19
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
40
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 600-3309
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Ridge Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.