Oakmont Of East Sacramento is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in East Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701121, licensed for 214 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 36 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated February 25, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Oakmont Of East Sacramento

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 214 residents · East Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701121, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5301 F Street · East Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 905-2400
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 214 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 8 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 214 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 44 times and filed 36 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated February 25, 2026.

Most recent state visit
February 25, 2026
Occupancy at the August 22, 2025 visit
150 of 214 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 19 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 26, 2022 to August 22, 2025. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 19 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 26 of 36 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Feb 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20259 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents’ incontinent care needs are being met Staff do not allow residents to eat their meals in a comfortable manner Staff do not ensure residents are treated with dignity and respect regarding their health conditions

On 08/22/025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator Kathleen Gilbey and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 150. It was alleged that staff do not ensure residents incontinent care needs are being met. The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, responsible parties, and direct observations. LPA Lee interviewed all 5 facility staff members, all of whom denied that residents’ incontinence care needs are not being met. According to staff interviews, residents are checked, changed, and encouraged to use the toilet every two hours. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250728104736
Apr 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation. Staff did not ensure a resident had sufficient clothing .

On 1/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kathleen Gibley and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 140. A brief interview with FDA Gibley was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation It was alleged that facility staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation. During the course of this investigation, LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that in August 2024 the facility noticed that there was a bed bug in a room on the second floor. Immediately facility staff called Eco Lab to treat the affected apartment. It was stated that Eco Lab also inspected the apartments on both sides of the affected apartment as well as apartment above the athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241029092509
20243 state visits · 8 documents
Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not respond to residents call pendant in a timely manner.

On 07/23/2024 at 9:30, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Pang Lee and Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Kathleen Gilbey and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 135. A brief interview with conducted with the administrator. Allegation: Staff does not respond to residents’ call pendant in a timely manner. It was alleged that staff does not respond to resident(s) call pendant in a timely manner. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 4 out of 9 residents who has concern regards to staff not responding to resident’s call pendant in a timely manner. LPA Lee requested and reviewed 8 residents SMART care log. It was learned that 7 out of 8 SMART care log resident’s alert was not responded; therefore, it is unclear if residents receive the support ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240520110159
Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not assisting resident with showers Staff did not ensure the residents blood glucose testing equipment was working properly Staff did not ensure residents medication was reordered timely causing the resident to miss medication

On 07/23/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Arielle Pascua and Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kathleen Gilbey and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 135. A brief interview with FDA Gilbey was conducted. Allegation: Staff are not assisting resident with showers. It was alleged that the staff are not assisting a resident with showers. During the course of this investigation, this LPA reviewed facility records and conducted staff and resident interviews. Based on facility records, R1 moved into the facility on 06/30/2023. On 06/30/2023, the faciltiy conducted a pre-assessment for R1 that only stated that this resident needed care for a special diabetic diet, fall risk program, and assistance with completion of insurance claim forms. A review of the facilities periodic assessmentsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240425082151
Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not prevent resident from making inappropriate comments to other residents.

On 07/23/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Arielle Pascua and Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kathleen Gibley and explain the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 135. A brief interview with FDA Gibley was conducted. It was alleged that the facility did not prevent a resident from making inappropriate comments to other residents. During the course of this investigation this LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews with staff and residents. A interview with 9 residents were conducted. 9 out of 9 residents state that they do not have any issues with any residents. 9 out 9 residents state they have not witnesed any residents speaking inappropriately with other residents. 9 out 9 residents deny having said any inappropriate comments to other residents. An interview with 5 staff membethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240508105359
Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings

THIS IS AN AMENDED VERSION OF THE ORIGINAL REPORT CREATED ON 07/23/2024. On 07/23/2024 at 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Pang Lee and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Assistant Executive Juliann Owens and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 135. A brief interview with conducted with the Juliann Allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings It was alleged that staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings. This investigation consisted of records reviewed and interviews with staff. It was learned that resident 1 (R1) did not want to inventory personal property. On 04/24/2024 administrator Kathleen Gilbey stated that (R1)’s glasses were safeguarded since it was not lost but were in (R1)’s room and that a facility staff notice that (R1)’s glasses were broken; therefore, the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240419093805
Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: ) Neglect/Lack of Supervision: Resident sustained a fracture due to lack of care from staff 2) Other: Facility call system is in disrepair 3) Reporting Requirements: Staff did not inform resident's authorized person of resident's hospitalization

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an announced inspection to the Oakmont of East Sacramento RCFE on 3/20/24 at 9:00am to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with Administrator, Kathleen Gilby and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations are determined to be substantiated. Regarding allegations that resident sustained an injury due to lack of care from staff, the Department conducted interviews with seven staff members and S1, S3, S5 and S7 (See confidential name list LIC-811 dated 3/20/24) all provided statements to the department that R1 being a fall risk and having multiple falls while at the facility. A1 and A2 statements revealed that the facility failed to provide R1 with a fall prevention plan. A2 provided several emails to S2 and S3 regarding R1's alert pendant not working properly and concerns to addresthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024 · control 27-AS-20230921115438
Mar 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20235 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond to resident(s) call bells in a timely manner.

On 10/24/2023 at 1:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator, Luis Olivas and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 147. A brief interview conducted with administrator, Luis Olivas. Allegation: Staff do not respond to resident(s) call bells in a timely manner. It was alleged that Staff does not respond to resident(s) call bells in a timely manner. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, interviews with staff, residents, and the resident responsible party. LPA Lee interviewed 7 out of 10 residents who has a concern in regards to staff not responding to resident’s call pendant in a timely manner. It was also learned that occasionally the alert was not responded; therefore, it is unclear if residents receive the support that residents needed. On 10/19/2023, it was learned that pthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231010102244
Oct 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements

On 10/19/2023 at 8:10 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator, Luis Olivas and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 147. A brief interview was conducted with administrator, Luis Olivas. Allegation: Staff is not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements. It was alleged that the staff is not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, interviews with staff, residents, and the resident responsible party. Throughout the course of the investigation, it was learned that resident 1 (R1)’s first and second invoice statement was sent to (R1) responsible party (RP), who then will forward the invoice statement to (R1). During the investigation, it was learned through (R1) that the facility may have misinterpreted (R1)the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230911162731
Sep 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights: Staff stole and fraudulently used residents credit cards. Reporting Requirements: Facility is not adhering to reporting requirements.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Oakmont of East Sacramento on 9/22/23 at 2:15pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Administrator and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations have been corroborated. The facility has self reported four instances of credit card theft and unauthorized credit card use. LPA interviewed three of the victims and two of the resident's interviewed were able to confirm that their credit cards were stolen and used without prior authorization. The facility had reported the instances of theft to local police department who concluded their investigation and arrested a staff member S1 (see confidential names list, LIC 811 dated 9/22/23) and is being charged with 12 felony counts per Administrator. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230728113120
Sep 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure the facility is in good repair.

On 09/05/2023 at 8:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Martinez met with Luis Olivas during today’s visit and, explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of this investigation, LPA Martinez conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. It was learned one of the facility's elevators was out of service on August 01, 2023. The facility contacted their contracted service operations repair company on August 02, 2023. In addition, the repair company inspected the elevator on August 02, 2023, and determined the elevator door motor was broken. A replacement part was order in a timely manner. However, the replacement part shipment was delayed. The elevator was repaired on August 11, 2023. Furthermore, during the time the elevator was out of order, the facility implemented meal tray service and transportation assistance for all resident. Continued... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230804090806
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations6typical 1
Substantiated complaints11typical 2
Total complaints23typical 7
State visits on file44typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020259902024382202391022022560
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 905-2400

Is Oakmont Of East Sacramento licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Of East Sacramento is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in East Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701121, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 214 residents. State records list 36 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 25, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oakmont Of East Sacramento care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of East Sacramento with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 214 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does Oakmont Of East Sacramento cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of East Sacramento's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Of East Sacramento accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Of East Sacramento is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

150 of 214 beds occupied (70%) when the state visited on August 22, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of East Sacramento?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 44 state visits and 36 dated documents since 2022 for Oakmont Of East Sacramento; 19 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 22, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

19 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure residents’ incontinent care needs are being met Staff do not allow residents to eat their meals in a comfortable manner Staff do not ensure residents are treated with dignity and respect regarding their health conditions
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/22/025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator Kathleen Gilbey and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 150. It was alleged that staff do not ensure residents incontinent care needs are being met. The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, responsible parties, and direct observations. LPA Lee interviewed all 5 facility staff members, all of whom denied that residents’ incontinence care needs are not being met. According to staff interviews, residents are checked, changed, and encouraged to use the toilet every two hours. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 22, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250728104736
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation. Staff did not ensure a resident had sufficient clothing .
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kathleen Gibley and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 140. A brief interview with FDA Gibley was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation It was alleged that facility staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation. During the course of this investigation, LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that in August 2024 the facility noticed that there was a bed bug in a room on the second floor. Immediately facility staff called Eco Lab to treat the affected apartment. It was stated that Eco Lab also inspected the apartments on both sides of the affected apartment as well as apartment above the aCDSS inspection report, January 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241029092509

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not respond to residents call pendant in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 07/23/2024 at 9:30, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Pang Lee and Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Kathleen Gilbey and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 135. A brief interview with conducted with the administrator. Allegation: Staff does not respond to residents’ call pendant in a timely manner. It was alleged that staff does not respond to resident(s) call pendant in a timely manner. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 4 out of 9 residents who has concern regards to staff not responding to resident’s call pendant in a timely manner. LPA Lee requested and reviewed 8 residents SMART care log. It was learned that 7 out of 8 SMART care log resident’s alert was not responded; therefore, it is unclear if residents receive the support thCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240520110159
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting resident with showers Staff did not ensure the residents blood glucose testing equipment was working properly Staff did not ensure residents medication was reordered timely causing the resident to miss medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 07/23/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Arielle Pascua and Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kathleen Gilbey and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 135. A brief interview with FDA Gilbey was conducted. Allegation: Staff are not assisting resident with showers. It was alleged that the staff are not assisting a resident with showers. During the course of this investigation, this LPA reviewed facility records and conducted staff and resident interviews. Based on facility records, R1 moved into the facility on 06/30/2023. On 06/30/2023, the faciltiy conducted a pre-assessment for R1 that only stated that this resident needed care for a special diabetic diet, fall risk program, and assistance with completion of insurance claim forms. A review of the facilities periodic assessmentsCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240425082151
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not prevent resident from making inappropriate comments to other residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 07/23/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Arielle Pascua and Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kathleen Gibley and explain the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 135. A brief interview with FDA Gibley was conducted. It was alleged that the facility did not prevent a resident from making inappropriate comments to other residents. During the course of this investigation this LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews with staff and residents. A interview with 9 residents were conducted. 9 out of 9 residents state that they do not have any issues with any residents. 9 out 9 residents state they have not witnesed any residents speaking inappropriately with other residents. 9 out 9 residents deny having said any inappropriate comments to other residents. An interview with 5 staff membeCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240508105359
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
THIS IS AN AMENDED VERSION OF THE ORIGINAL REPORT CREATED ON 07/23/2024. On 07/23/2024 at 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Pang Lee and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Assistant Executive Juliann Owens and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 135. A brief interview with conducted with the Juliann Allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings It was alleged that staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings. This investigation consisted of records reviewed and interviews with staff. It was learned that resident 1 (R1) did not want to inventory personal property. On 04/24/2024 administrator Kathleen Gilbey stated that (R1)’s glasses were safeguarded since it was not lost but were in (R1)’s room and that a facility staff notice that (R1)’s glasses were broken; therefore, the facilityCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240419093805
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed) Neglect/Lack of Supervision: Resident sustained a fracture due to lack of care from staff 2) Other: Facility call system is in disrepair 3) Reporting Requirements: Staff did not inform resident's authorized person of resident's hospitalization
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an announced inspection to the Oakmont of East Sacramento RCFE on 3/20/24 at 9:00am to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with Administrator, Kathleen Gilby and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations are determined to be substantiated. Regarding allegations that resident sustained an injury due to lack of care from staff, the Department conducted interviews with seven staff members and S1, S3, S5 and S7 (See confidential name list LIC-811 dated 3/20/24) all provided statements to the department that R1 being a fall risk and having multiple falls while at the facility. A1 and A2 statements revealed that the facility failed to provide R1 with a fall prevention plan. A2 provided several emails to S2 and S3 regarding R1's alert pendant not working properly and concerns to addresCDSS inspection report, March 20, 2024 · control 27-AS-20230921115438

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond to resident(s) call bells in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/24/2023 at 1:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator, Luis Olivas and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 147. A brief interview conducted with administrator, Luis Olivas. Allegation: Staff do not respond to resident(s) call bells in a timely manner. It was alleged that Staff does not respond to resident(s) call bells in a timely manner. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, interviews with staff, residents, and the resident responsible party. LPA Lee interviewed 7 out of 10 residents who has a concern in regards to staff not responding to resident’s call pendant in a timely manner. It was also learned that occasionally the alert was not responded; therefore, it is unclear if residents receive the support that residents needed. On 10/19/2023, it was learned that pCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231010102244
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/19/2023 at 8:10 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator, Luis Olivas and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 147. A brief interview was conducted with administrator, Luis Olivas. Allegation: Staff is not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements. It was alleged that the staff is not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, interviews with staff, residents, and the resident responsible party. Throughout the course of the investigation, it was learned that resident 1 (R1)’s first and second invoice statement was sent to (R1) responsible party (RP), who then will forward the invoice statement to (R1). During the investigation, it was learned through (R1) that the facility may have misinterpreted (R1)CDSS inspection report, October 19, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230911162731
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights: Staff stole and fraudulently used residents credit cards. Reporting Requirements: Facility is not adhering to reporting requirements.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Oakmont of East Sacramento on 9/22/23 at 2:15pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Administrator and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations have been corroborated. The facility has self reported four instances of credit card theft and unauthorized credit card use. LPA interviewed three of the victims and two of the resident's interviewed were able to confirm that their credit cards were stolen and used without prior authorization. The facility had reported the instances of theft to local police department who concluded their investigation and arrested a staff member S1 (see confidential names list, LIC 811 dated 9/22/23) and is being charged with 12 felony counts per Administrator. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230728113120
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure the facility is in good repair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/05/2023 at 8:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Martinez met with Luis Olivas during today’s visit and, explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of this investigation, LPA Martinez conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. It was learned one of the facility's elevators was out of service on August 01, 2023. The facility contacted their contracted service operations repair company on August 02, 2023. In addition, the repair company inspected the elevator on August 02, 2023, and determined the elevator door motor was broken. A replacement part was order in a timely manner. However, the replacement part shipment was delayed. The elevator was repaired on August 11, 2023. Furthermore, during the time the elevator was out of order, the facility implemented meal tray service and transportation assistance for all resident. Continued... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 5, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230804090806
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedsuspicious death.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to Oakmont of East Sacramento on 7/25/23 at 2:45pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Administrator and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be substantiated. Regarding suspicious death: LPA reviewed former resident's file and could not obtain any information documented in the resident's file pertaining to a history of seizures. Physician's report, medication records and care plan developed by the resident's physician and the facility did not identify any history of seizures or medications to reduce seizures. There was no identified care plan to address seizures. Per the Reporting Party (RP), RP stated they had the resident's medications for seizures discontinued by doctors orders and did not agree resident needed medications. Report ContinCDSS inspection report, July 25, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230303085415
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed) Facility staff are not ensuring that resident receives showers while in care. 2) Facility staff are not ensuring that resident's room is cleaned. 3) Facility staff are not providing resident food that follows their dietary restrictions.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Oakmont of East Sacrmaento (RCFE) on 5/10/23 at 1:15pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Administrator and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be substantiated because Resident #1 (R1) has denied the allegations. R1 provided statements to LPA and LPA obtained facility records documenting resident's refusal for assistance with showering and documents when resident accepts assistance with showering. R1 states she only needs assistance half of the time the remainder she does without assistance. Staff will check with resident every two to three days for assistance with showering. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 10, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230126132535
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff did not meet with responsible party for reappraisal meeting -Staff do not shower resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 1/13/23 at 9:50AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Hopkins conducted an unannounced facility visit in regards to a complaint investigation with the above allegations. LPA Hopkins met with Executive Director Luis Olivas and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of Staff did not meet with responsible party for reappraisal meeting, the Department found the following; based on interview and record review, it was determined that Resident 1(R1) had a healthcare POA, who was not the complainant. The healthcare POA was present for this reappraisal meeting that occured on 12/15/22. Regarding the allegation of Staff do not shower resident, the Department found the following; based on interview and record review, it was determined that R1 gets showers twice a week and there is documentation confirming this. Staff note if the resident refuses as well. Based on the investigation conducted the allegations are UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded mCDSS inspection report, January 13, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230106163249

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 44 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
11
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
23
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
44
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 905-2400
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Of East Sacramento? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.