Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701152, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 21, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

20 homes in view

Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701152, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2710 Eastern Ave · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 613-0647
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 5 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 1 resident
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60+. APPROVED FOR 5 NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 AMBULATORY. NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOMS 1, 2, 3, 6. AMBULATORY ONLY IN ROOM 5. ROOMS 2,3,5,6 ARE SINGLE OCCUPANCY ONLY. ROOM 1 APPROVED AS SHARED ROOM. BACKYARD STUDIOS NOT APPROVED FOR OCCUPANCY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 21, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 18, 2026
Occupancy at the December 23, 2024 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 31, 2022 to December 23, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is engaging in physical activities. Staff did not ensure resident was transported to medical appointments. Staff did not provide a comfortable environment for a resident in care. Staff are not monitoring resident's health condition Staff are not administering medication as prescribed Facility did not ensure that staff are trained. Staff did not ensure resident is provided with appropriate food and beverages.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Vincent Moleski made an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPAs Holly Williams and Vincent Moleski met with Josevata Turaga and together discussed the investigation details. Diane Garcia the administrator through text gave permission for Turaga to sign the report. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and record review. LPA Williams interviewed administrator Diane Garcia. LPA Williams interviewed staff (S1-S2), 5 residents (R1-R5), case manager (CM), responsible party for R5 (RP) and home health nurses (HHN1-HHN2). When LPA Williams visited the facility on 9/19/24 LPA Williams heard very loud music coming from R4’s room. LPA Williams asked S1 if he could ask R4 could turn the music down and S1 did. In an interview, R5’s RP when helping R5 move out there was loud music playing and 5 minutes after they arrived S1 turned it down. In an interview withthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240912224643
Dec 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations8typical 0
Type B citations6typical 0
Substantiated complaints12typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file27typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025330202489120236712022331
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $5,000–$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 613-0647

Is Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii licensed?

Yes — Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701152, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 21, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60+. APPROVED FOR 5 NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 AMBULATORY. NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOMS 1, 2, 3, 6. AMBULATORY ONLY IN ROOM 5. ROOMS 2,3,5,6 ARE SINGLE OCCUPANCY ONLY. ROOM 1 APPROVED AS SHARED ROOM. BACKYARD STUDIOS NOT APPROVED FOR OCCUPANCY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.

How much does Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on December 23, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2022 for Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 23, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure resident is engaging in physical activities. Staff did not ensure resident was transported to medical appointments. Staff did not provide a comfortable environment for a resident in care. Staff are not monitoring resident's health condition Staff are not administering medication as prescribed Facility did not ensure that staff are trained. Staff did not ensure resident is provided with appropriate food and beverages.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Vincent Moleski made an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPAs Holly Williams and Vincent Moleski met with Josevata Turaga and together discussed the investigation details. Diane Garcia the administrator through text gave permission for Turaga to sign the report. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and record review. LPA Williams interviewed administrator Diane Garcia. LPA Williams interviewed staff (S1-S2), 5 residents (R1-R5), case manager (CM), responsible party for R5 (RP) and home health nurses (HHN1-HHN2). When LPA Williams visited the facility on 9/19/24 LPA Williams heard very loud music coming from R4’s room. LPA Williams asked S1 if he could ask R4 could turn the music down and S1 did. In an interview, R5’s RP when helping R5 move out there was loud music playing and 5 minutes after they arrived S1 turned it down. In an interview with— CDSS inspection report, December 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240912224643

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not dispense medications as prescribed. Staff did not provide adequate meals for resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 05-05-2023 at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez conducted an unannounced facility visit in regards to open a complaint investigation with the above allegations and close the investigation. LPA Martinez met with Nadine Mills and Charlotte Lewis and explained the purpose of today's visit. During today's complaint investigation, LPA Martinez reviewed two medication files. Resident 1's (R1) Medication Administration Record (MAR) was not properly maintained. The May 2023 MAR sheet is missing medication entries for the following: Alodipine 5MG, Xarelto 20MG, Gabapentin 300MG, Omeprazole 20MG, Lisinopril 20 MG, Albuterol 0.083 % 3ML, Combivent Respimat AER BOE, Trueplus Ultra Thing 30G L, True Metrix Glucose. Furthermore, R1 has a 04/24/2023 doctor's order stating..."R1 has been treated to take Gabapentin 600 MG tablet take 1 three times a day." However, R1's MAR states Gabapentin 25 MG 1 tablet by mouth 3 times per day was administered. Continued... Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, May 5, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230501151100

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident leaving the facility. Resident sustained a fall due to lack of care and supervision. staff did not provide medical attention in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility unannounced on 10/31/2022 at 1:47 PM to open a complaint and deliver findings, LPA Martinez met with Diana Garcia, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA Martinez conducted interviews and obtained facility records. On October 22, 2022, staff 1 (S1) left the residents unsupervised at 10:30 PM, and resident 1 (R1) eloped from the facility during this time. Law enforcement was called on October 22, 2022, and R1 was returned to the facility and later sent to the hospital on this day. R1 also, eloped from the facility on October 24, 2022 at 3 AM. R1 was returned to the facility by Law Enforcement on October 24, 2022. Moreover, on October 24, 2022, Law enforcement found resident 2 (R2) on the floor next to their bed. It is unknown how long R2 was on the floor, and R2 was not provided medical attention until Law Enforcement found R2. Continued... Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, October 31, 2022 · control 27-AS-20221027090944

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
8
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
12
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
27
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Garcia, Diana, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 613-0647
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Golden Legacy Elderly Care Ii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.