Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Golden Legacy Elderly Care IILicense #342701152 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareGolden Legacy Elderly Care IILicense #342701152 · 2710 Eastern Ave, Sacramento, CA · (916) 613-0647Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Sacramento County/Sacramento/Golden Legacy Elderly Care II
The state lists this licence as on probation. Read the dated state documents.
Map · 2710 Eastern Ave

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,350/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,400 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (916) 613-0647

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

GL

Call Golden Legacy Elderly Care II

Sacramento · Licensed for 6

(916) 613-0647

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Sacramento

Golden Legacy Elderly Care II

2710 Eastern Ave, Sacramento, CA 95821 · On state probation

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Golden Legacy Elderly Care II

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,350 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,400 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 5 residents
  • Hospiceup to 1 resident

Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60+. APPROVED FOR 5 NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 AMBULATORY. NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOMS 1, 2, 3, 6. AMBULATORY ONLY IN ROOM 5. ROOMS 2,3,5,6 ARE SINGLE OCCUPANCY ONLY. ROOM 1 APPROVED AS SHARED ROOM. BACKYARD ST UDIOS NOT APPROVED FOR OCCUPANCY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Golden Legacy Elderly Care II: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,350a month to start

Likely $3,550–$5,400

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,350likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,350likely $3,550–$5,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,550–$5,600
$4,350
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,200–$8,800
$6,850
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,200 to $5,500

$3,200$5,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$5,000.

  • Eastern ManorSacramento · 0.1 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Abundant Love and Care for the ElderlyCarmichael · 1.0 mi · Small home
    $3,300Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Marylou's Home CareSacramento · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Norris Senior HomeSacramento · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sunny Beach VillaSacramento · 1.3 mi · Small home
    $3,200Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Courtyard TerraceSacramento · 1.5 mi · Mid-size home
    $4,345Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Cozy Home CareCarmichael · 1.7 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Madison Square Senior Living IICarmichael · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Kentfield Estates Ranch RCFESacramento · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Meraki of SacramentoSacramento · 2.8 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Marconi VillaSacramento · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

2710 Eastern Ave, Sacramento, CA 95821Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - SacramentoHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.8 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #342701152 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 18 of 28 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20265 state visits · 6 documents

Oct 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide a comfortable facility environment to residents in care

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Golden Legacy Elderly Care II RCFE on 7/17/26 at 9:00am to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Dillon Williams and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, as well as LPA observations and recordings obtained by LPA the allegations are substantiated, LPA has Conducted interviews with multiple residents and Reporting Party. RP and one resident confirmed the loud music as being disruptive to peace and quite in shared facility. LPA conducted interview with resident who demonstrated volume on large stereo equipment in room. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C. Substantiated LPA also received a voicemail from a resident following a facility inspection where LPA could hear the stereo volume in the background that exceeds appropriate levels in a shared living environment. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of Personal Rights is substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the home.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260224110236

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 20, 2026

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by a resident playing music at a volume that disturbs other residents and poses an immediate personal rights risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee shall review personal rights with all residents and obtain signatures from each resident acknowledging understanding of personal rights for all residents at the facility. Copies will be retained in each residents file and a copy will be sent to LPA by the POC due date.

Jul 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: ) The facility allowed excluded individuals to work in the facility. 2) Staff are forging resident documents.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection at Golden Legacy Elderly Care II (RCFE) on 7/17/26 at 9:00am to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with Staff, Dillon Williams and together discussed the investigation details. Based on files obtained and reviewed during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegation. LPA reviewed 6 resident files. LPA requested and obtained physician reports (LIC 602) for all 6 residents in care (see confidential name list LIC-811 dated 7/17/26). LPA Gould reviewed reports for each resident. Upon review, the department has no concerns for five of the six physician reports are being altered or fraudulent. The files reviewed appear to be completed by the resident’s physician or an appropriately skilled professional that are able to complete the forms per department regulations. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with Three staff members and three residents, all individuals interviewed denied ever witnessing the identified excluded individuals present at the facility. LPA showed pictures of identified excluded individuals and all persons interviewed did not recognize them. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Other are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of other is substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the home.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260211143110

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 20, 2026

Administrator - Qualifications and Duties: All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. The licensee and the administrator may be one and the same person. The administrator shall have sufficient freedom from other responsibilities and shall be on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility as specified in this section. When the administrator is not in the facility, there shall be coverage by a designated substitute who shall have qualifications adequate to be responsible and accountable for management and administration of the facility as specified in this section. The Department may require that the administrator devote additional hours in the facility to fulfill his/her responsibilities when the need for such additional hours is substantiated by written documentation. This requirement was not met as evidence by LPA observations and statements received while conducting 14 inspections since February 2026 to present, the administrator was present two of the 14 inspections which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2026

Plan of correction: licensee shall to provide an updated LIC 500 form indicating the dates and times the administrator are to be at the facility. Additionally, facility will keep a monthly log of administrator presence at the facility including signing in when the administrator arrives at the facility and time they depart the facility to ensure a record of administrator presence at the facility.

May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

On 5/21/26 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) inspection to ensure previously identified deficiencies have been corrected per the agreed upon plan of correction. LPA observed the back ramp to the rear bedroom has been replaced and is sturdy to bear weight of residents and visitors. LPA observed facility has obtained a lock box for refrigerated medications and stored secure from residents. LPA also observed an adequate food supply that meets regulations and all items are of good quality and all food present has a future expiration date. Exit interview conducted and POC letters generated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026
May 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 5/8/26 at 1:00pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Golden Legacy Elderly Care II RCFE for the purpose of conducting a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with staff, Peni Vuidreketi and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA and staff evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor and clean. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed the ramp in the back of the facility from the back bedroom in in need of repair. The wood flooring is rotten and LPAs foot went through the flooring waking up the ramp. LPA also observed the sling door screen is broken and in need of repair/replacement. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 112 degrees F which meets the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 the following deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2026

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Feb 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 2/13/26 at 11:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced Case Management -deficiencies inspection to address deficiencies observed while conducting a complaint investigation. LPA met with staff Mereisi Naisausau. LPA Gould inspected the food supply and observed approximately 20 canned goods that had expired in 2024 or 2025. LPA observed staff dispose of expired food items. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and observed one resident file with no signed admission agreement, ID and emergency information or pre-placement appraisal for R1 (see LIC-811 dated 2/13/26). Additionally, LPA inspected the medication supply and observed staff member disposing of used syringes in common medication containers that do not meet the safety requirements outlined in title 22 regulations. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, the following deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 16, 2026

General Food Service Requirements: All food shall be of good quality. Commercial foods shall be approved by appropriate federal, state and local authorities. Food in damaged containers shall not be accepted, used or retained. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observations of approximately 20 canned goods that had expired dates including 2024 and 2025 which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee shall provide a written policy for reviewing food supplies and disposing of expired food items.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87303(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 16, 2026

Maintenance and Operation: Syringes and needles are disposed of in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5193 concerning bloodborne pathogens. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observations and staff statements that used syringes are disposed of in old medication containers that do not meet requirements specified in regulations which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee shall obtain a container for used syringes that meets the requirements in regulations and provide a written statement that they have reviewed and understand the requirements in the regulations.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 16, 2026

Resident Records: Resident Records. A separate, complete, and current record shall be maintained for each resident in the facility, readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff and shall contained specified information. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA review of resident records, R1 has an incomplete (blank) admissions agreement and no pre-placement appraisal which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee shall ensure all resident files are complete, signed and dated. Licensee shall submit a written statement to the department stating they have reviewed and understand the regulations and requirements.

20253 state visits · 3 documents

Jun 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 6/24/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams conducted a case management inspection to ensure that the facility has stayed in substantial compliance since the informal meeting on 5/15/25 and to ensure that the compliance plan has been completed. LPA called the Licensee Diane Garcia and together discussed the report and Garcia gave permission for S2 to sign the report. According to Diana Garcia the facility designated administrator (FDA) Stacy Smith is on leave from 6/16/25 to 6/30/25. LPA conducted an inspection and upon entering the facility LPA observed a new caregiver S1. In an interview, R1 stated that they have met the administrator one time. LPA asked R2 if they had seen the administrator Stacy Smith and R2 stated they did not know that person. LPA found that S1's criminal record clearance was not cleared for this facility. LPA asked for S1's file and the health screening and the personnel record was not filled out except for S1's start date which was 5/28/25. LPA observed employee time sheets for S1 and the time sheets start on 6/10/25. LPA checked the LIC500 and it has not been updated to the new employee that in the facility. According to the licensee's compliance plan, they were supposed to hire additional staff by 6/15/25. According to S1 and S3 and the time sheets there has only been one caregiver at a time working at the facility. According to the compliance plan, the Licensee Diana Garcia was supposed to have training completed for the staff on chemical storage and safety, medication administration, storage, documentation, and special diets by 6/10/25. LPA has not received any proof of the a fore mentioned training's. [Continued on 809-C] The following deficiencies were observed and cited on the following LIC 809-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Health and Safety Codes. Appeal Rights and the report were left at the facility at this time. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(b) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 25, 2025

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (b) Prior to the Department issuing a license, the applicant, administrator and any adults other than a client.. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review S1 did not have a criminal record clearance with the facility which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to send in a statement of understanding of the regulation to the LPA by the POC due date. Licensee agrees to include in the statement that the facility will not have any employees working on the premises that do not have a background clearance. Holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87412(e) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 25, 2025

87412 Personnel Records (e) In all cases, personnel records shall demonstrate adequate staff coverage necessary for facility operation by documenting the hours actually worked. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above because there is only 1 person scheduled 24 hours a day 7 days aweek which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees update the LIC500 and hire additional staff to make sure there is 24 hour 7 days a week coverage at all times by POC due.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87405(d)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 25, 2025

87405(d)(2 If the licensee is also the administrator, all requirements for an administrator shall apply. (2) Knowledge of and ability to conform...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not abide by the compliance plan and regulations which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to send a statement of understanding of the regulation cited to the LPA by the POC due date. Licensee agrees to send proof of completion of the compliance plan that was written by the licensee by July 1, 2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87411(f) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 25, 2025

(f) All personnel, including the licensee and administrator, shall be in good health, and physically and mentally capable of performing assigned tasks... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the facility did n ot have a health screening for S1 which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to complete S1's file and send to LPA by 7/1/25. Licensee agrees to send a statement of understanding of the regulation cited to LPA by POC due date.

May 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

A virtual Informal conference was conducted today on 05/15/2025 at 1:00 PM via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss complaint allegations and non-compliance concerns. Present in the meeting are Licensing Program Manager Czarrina Camilon-Lee, and Licensing Program Analyst Holly Williams, and Licensee Diana Garcia. The informal conference process was explained during this meeting to include the administrative processes. Discussed Concerns: The following concerns were discussed: back house and shed and permitting for these structures, staff associations, Inadequate administrator hours, staffing, special diets, medication storage, medication administration. storage of cleaning supplies, and activities for residents. The facility agreed to provide a plan by 5/30/2025 for the list below and to ensure the facility stays in substantial compliance · Have activities available and offer outings. · Shed in backyard available for inspection and if someone moves in to have the structures permitted by the city and obtain fingerprint clearances. · Employ more staff. · Ensure all staff are associated and to utilize Guardian. · Ensure and train staff on medication administration, medication storage and documentation, and special diets. Continued LIC-809 · Provide LIC500 and ensure it is always updated. · Ensure cleaning supplies are locked up. Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) will do the following: · Increase Monitoring Licensee agrees to receive Technical Support Program (TSP) referral. The licensee was advised failure to follow agreed plan could result in a Non-Compliance Conference. No deficiencies were cited during today's meeting. An exit interview was conducted with facility representatives Diana Garcia, and a copy of this report was provided via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2025
Apr 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and LPA Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Williams called and spoke with facility licensee on the phone Diana Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Williams asked Diana Garcia to come to the facility or to have the new administrator Stacy Smith be present. Garcia stated that Smith could not come because Smith is at the other facility and if Smith did not show up then Aisake Jemesa the caregiver can sign the report. 2 hours into the inspection the licensee Diana Garcia arrived at the facility. LPA Williams reviewed 6 resident files (R1-R6) and six staff files (S1-S6). LPA Williams toured the facility with Aisake Jemesa and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 82 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. The facility's water temperature measured 109.8 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 105 and 120 degrees. LPA Williams observed bathroom did not have a bath mat. LPA Williams observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and working carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Williams observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Williams observed a locked cabinet for the storage of medication. LPA Williams observed unlocked cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions. The garage was unlocked and the cleaning supplies and poisons were accessible to residents. LPA Williams observed the knives locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA Williams observed in R1's room a bag of candy, the smell of urine was strong, and medication was out and accessible. [Continue on 809-C] LPA Williams reviewed R1's LIC 602 and it stated that R1 is on a special diet and R1 cannot store R1's own medication. LPA observed LIC500 dated 3/20/25 states 1 staff member scheduled Tuesday through Saturday. LPA Williams observed a LIC500 that had the administrator working Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. LPA Williams while conducting record review found S1 did not have a health screening or a TB Test. LPA Williams interviewed 1 staff member (S7) and 1 resident (R1). The following deficiencies were observed and cited on the following LIC 809-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Health and Safety Codes. Appeal Rights were printed and a copy was given to the facility licensee at this time. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2025

20248 state visits · 9 documents

Dec 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is engaging in physical activities. Staff did not ensure resident was transported to medical appointments. Staff did not provide a comfortable environment for a resident in care. Staff are not monitoring resident's health condition Staff are not administering medication as prescribed Facility did not ensure that staff are trained. Staff did not ensure resident is provided with appropriate food and beverages.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Vincent Moleski made an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPAs Holly Williams and Vincent Moleski met with Josevata Turaga and together discussed the investigation details. Diane Garcia the administrator through text gave permission for Turaga to sign the report. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and record review. LPA Williams interviewed administrator Diane Garcia. LPA Williams interviewed staff (S1-S2), 5 residents (R1-R5), case manager (CM), responsible party for R5 (RP) and home health nurses (HHN1-HHN2). When LPA Williams visited the facility on 9/19/24 LPA Williams heard very loud music coming from R4’s room. LPA Williams asked S1 if he could ask R4 could turn the music down and S1 did. In an interview, R5’s RP when helping R5 move out there was loud music playing and 5 minutes after they arrived S1 turned it down. In an interview with R5 they stated that the loud music was distressing to R5. In an interview, CM said that they had heard the loud music, and it was distressing to R5. [Continued on 9099-C] Substantiated In an interview, on 10/01/24, CM and HHN1 said they arrived at the facility on 9/6/24 to see R5 decompensating. In an interview, HHN1 said R5 was wheezing but R5’s lungs were clear. In an interview, HHN1 said it was anxiety. In an interview, HHN1 and CM said they asked S1 if S1 was administering R5’s inhaler and S1 said it was on the bed. In an interview, CM said they did not find an inhaler on the bed. In an interview CM and HHN1 said they looked for R5’s sensor on R5’s arm and it wasn’t there. In an interview, CM said S1 pulled out 2 bins with medication for R5 and HHN1 pulled out the inhaler and S1 said they had not seen that inhaler before. In an interview, both HHN1 and CM said that S1 had the Medication Administration Record (MAR) filled out to date but did not know what the medication looked like. In an interview, HHN1 said they asked if S1 is the one who gives all the medications to R5 and S1 said yes. In an interview, HHN1 said they asked where R5's diabetic monitor is and S1 said they did not know. In an interview, CM said on 9/25/24, S1 pulled out 2 bins with medication for R5 and the HHN1 pulled out the inhaler and S1 said S1 had not seen that inhaler before. In an interview, CM said that not all required medications were in the bin. LPA Williams asked who gives the injections of insulin and HHN2 said the staff members do. In an interview, HHN2 said that HHN2 educated S1 on how to give the injection and to apply the diabetic monitors. In an interview, HHN1 said that nursing only goes there once a week. In an interview, HHN2 said that R5 could inject themselves when R5 is feeling good but there are times when R5 cannot inject themselves. In an interview, on 9/6/24 CM said they took a picture of the food served to R5 and it was fried potatoes, hot-dogs with barbecue sauce and sent it to LPA Williams. In an interview with the administrator Garcia, Garcia told LPA Williams that Garcia has pictures of the meals that S1 is feeding to R5, When LPA Williams received pictures from Garcia, they were pictures of the diabetic meals that were sent to R5 by CM after they saw what R5 was eating. LPA Williams and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Czarrina Camilon-Lee visited Golden Legacy II on 11/06/24 and went into R3’s room LPA Williams and LPM Camilon-Lee observed candy in a bag on the night stand and a bucket halfway filled with candy on the floor. When LPA Williams questioned S1 about the candy S1 said,” oh yeah R3’s family brought that.” LPA Williams reviewed R3’’s medical assessment (LIC602) that states R3 is pre diabetic and tests his blood sugar. LPA Williams reviewed the pre appraisal for R3 states that R3 should be on a diabetic diet and that R3 is taking Metformin which is a diabetic medication. In an interview, R5’s RP said that R5 would tell them that the food is not healthy, and the food was cold. In an interview, R5’s RP said R5 was served dinner while they were there, and RP had a chance to see the food the facility was serving. In an interview, R5’s RP said the food R5 was being served [Continued on 9099-C] was all starch and they would call it, “Junk Food.” According to the medical assessment (LIC602) R2 is supposed to have a soft diet and while LPA Williams and LPM Czarrina Camilon Lee were there R2 was served a sandwich with chips and grapes. In an interview, R5 stated that there was not planned activities. In an interview, R2, R5, and the CM all stated there are no planned activities. S4 said that there are not planned activities. Through record review, LPA Williams found that S1 only had 36.5 hours of training done when starting work at the facility when 40 is required. As a result of this investigation, LPA Williams finds the allegation(s) to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited per CCR Title section 87465(a)(4), 87628(b)(4), 87219(a)(4), 87468.1(a)(2), 87465(a)(2), 87411(c), and 87628(a). An exit interview was conducted with Josevata Turanga. A copy of this report was provided to Josevata Turanga.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240912224643

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 31, 2024

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility did not take R5 to R5's doctor appointments which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agree's to write a statement of stating that the licensee will take the residents to and from their doctors appointments by the POC due date. Holly Williams@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(c) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 31, 2024

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview S1 did not have 40 hours total of training before starting employment with the facility which poses an potential health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to write a statement committing to having all initial training which is 40 hours completed before an employee starts working at the facility by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 24, 2024

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview S1 did not administer R5's inhaler which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to retrain all staff members on how to store medication and how to administer medication. Licensee agrees to provide a written plan on when training will be and will send to LPA Williams by POC due date. When training is finished licensee agrees to send the sign in sheet and training materials to LPA Williams on date of statement of training.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87628(b)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 24, 2024

87628 Diabetes (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (4) Providing modified diets as prescribed by a resident's physician as specified in Section 87555(b)(7). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview S1 did not prepare meals for residents that according to the Physicians report need a diabetic diet and allowed R3 who is on a diabetic diet to have candy in their room which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to retrain all staff members on specialized diets. Licensee agrees to provide a written plan on when training will be by POC due date and will send LPA Williams the sign in sheet and training material by date on statement of training. date.Holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87219(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 31, 2024

87219 Planned Activities a) Residents shall be encouraged to maintain and develop their fullest potential for independent living through participation in planned activities. The activities made available shall include: (4) Physical activities such as games, sports and exercise which develop and maintain strength, coordination and range of motion. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview Licensee does not provide planned activities or physical activities which poses an potential health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to retrain all staff members on planned activities and send LPA Williams a calendar with scheduled planned physical activities by POC due date. Licensee agrees to provide a written plan on when training will be and will send LPA Williams the sign in sheet and training materials by statement of planned training due date. Holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 30, 2024

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interviews S1 and licensee did provide a comfortable living enviroment which poses an potential health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to write a statement of understanding that all residents have the right to live in a comfortable enviroment. and explaining what the licensee will do in the future to meet that requirement by POC due date. Holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87628(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 24, 2024

"(a) The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has diabetes if the resident is able to perform his/her own glucose testing with blood or urine specimens, and is able to administer his/her own medication including medication administered orally or through injection, or has it administered by an appropriately skilled professional." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, a resident was not able to perform their own blood glucose testing or injections, and staff were not monitoring their ability to do so, which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to send a plan for training of all staff on change of conditions and reporting to administrator of change of conditions.Send this plan to LPA Williams by POC due date. Holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

Dec 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to deliver finding on a complaint and discovered unrelated deficiencies. LPA Williams texted Diana Garcia to inform her of deficiencies found and Garcia stated Josevata Turaga could sign the reports. LPA Moleski toured a resident's (R1's) room and observed a folding pocketknife with the blade extended alongside antacid tablets and numerous packages of nicotine gum on a small table next to the resident's bed. This facility is hereby cited per 22 CCR Sections 87465(h)(2) and 87309(a). This facility was previously cited on 11/6/24 for having medications unlocked, including the same kind of antacid tablets. As this is a repeat violation, a civil penalty in the amount of $250 is hereby assessed. An exit interview was held with Turaga. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Turaga.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 24, 2024

"(a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, a resident was in posession of a knife, which poses an immediate health and safety risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to remove the knife from the resident's room by the POC due date. Failure to do so will result in additional civil penalties. Licensee shall provide LPA Williams with a photograph of the resident's room showing that all unsafe or hazardous items have been removed. holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 24, 2024

"(2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, a resident was allowed access to medication, which poses an immediate health and safety risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to remove the medication from the resident's room by the POC due date. Failure to do so will result in additional civil penalties. Licensee shall provide LPA Williams with a photograph of the resident's room showing that all unsafe or hazardous items have been removed. holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

Nov 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced case management visit on 11/21/2024. This visit is to confirm ORDERS TO INDIVIDUAL FOR IMMEDIATE EXCLUSION FROM ALL FACILITIES. LPA met with caregiver Misivono Qadroka and stated the purpose of visit. Facility understands this is an Immediate Exclusion effective 11/21/2024 and S1 is excluded and cannot be allowed to work, live in, and/or have contact with clients in any residential facility licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Therefore, the Department orders the facility to remove S1 from any contact with clients and not allow this employee to be physically present in the facility. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided on this date. A signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these forms.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2024
Nov 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

This report is being amended due to LPA error. Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to amend this report on 11/19/2024. LPAs Moleski and Williams met with Misivono Qadroka and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Williams previously cited this facility per 22 CCR Section 87465(h)(2) on 11/6/24. LPA Williams had set the due date for the plan of correction for 11/8/24. LPA Williams received a request for an extension of this due date on 11/08/24. LPA Williams approved this extension on 11/08/24. On 11/18/24, LPA Williams arrived to conduct a plan of correction visit. LPA Williams erroneously assessed $1,000 worth of daily civil penalties for a failure to correct, despite having previously granted an extension to licensee Diana Garcia, as described above. All civil penalties assessed on 11/18/24 are hereby waived, as they were assessed in error. LPA Williams received a plan of corrections from Garcia on 11/18/24. LPA Williams cleared the plan of correction during this visit on 11/19/24, and provided Misivono Qadroka with a clearance letter. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was left with Misivono Qadroka .the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2024
Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams and Licensing Program Manager Czarrina Camilon-Lee arrived unannounced for this complaint investigation. LPA Williams and LPM Camilon-Lee met with caregiver Misivono Qadroka and explained the purpose of the visit. The administrator Diane Garcia was asked to come to the facility but declined and asked if Garcia could call. During an interview with R3 LPA Williams found unlocked medications In resident night stand drawer accessible to anyone: Robitussin cough medicine and acid rescue. The following deficiencies cited. See LIC809-D. Appeal rights provided. This investigation consisted of record review and interviews with staff and residents. LPA Williams interviewed (R1-R4) and did record review for R3, R4, R2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 8, 2024

87465Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible ... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation of LPA Williams and LPM Camilon-Lee medications were observed unlocked in night stand drawer which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2024

Plan of correction: Staff agreed to lock up the medicines today. Administrator Diane Garcia will send a statement of understanding stating that the regulations have been reviewed and staff has been retrained on medication storage by POC due date. Holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to open a complaint investigation and observed unrelated deficiencies. LPAs Moleski and Williams spoke with facility administrator Diana Garcia on the telephone and explained the purpose of the visit. Garcia said staff member Misivono Qadroka could sign this report in her absence. Upon arrival, LPAs Moleski and Williams observed a caregiver present in the facility (S1). LPA Williams reviewed Guardian records and observed S1 was not associated to this facility. S1 told LPA Moleski that they had been working at this facility since 9/1/24, and works five days per week. LPAs Moleski and Williams reviewed S1's file and observed that it was not complete. S1's personnel record (LIC 501) was not completed, did not include S1's educational history or past work experience, and was not signed by S1. This facility is hereby cited per 22 CCR Sections 87355(e)(2) and 87412(a). An exit interview was held with Garcia. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Qadroka.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 19, 2024

"(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility... (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c)..." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview S1 was not associated with the facility which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to associate S1 by POC due date. Holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87412(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 23, 2024

"87412 Personnel Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee. Each personnel record shall contain the following information..." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, S1 did not have a completed personnel record which poses a potential health, safety, and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have personnel record completed by POC due date. Holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

Aug 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPAs Moleski and Williams spoke with licensee Diana Garcia over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. During a prior visit, LPAs Moleski and Williams observed two backyard sheds, which have not been permitted for habitation and which have not been cleared by the fire department. During the visit, one of the sheds had an air conditioning unit running, but the windows were blocked. LPAs Moleski and Williams observed through the windows of the second shed personal affects, including food and medications, along with a pet cat. LPAs Moleski and Williams knocked on both sheds but received no answer. In an interview, Garcia said she and her mother had used and were still using the sheds for habitation on occasion. During this visit, LPAs Moleski and Williams observed a sewer outflow pipe which had spewed out toilet paper and feces at some previous time. The toilet paper and feces were dried up and caked onto the cement patio. A staff member (S1) said that the toilet paper and feces had been there for at least two weeks. This facility is being cited per 22 CCR Sections 87303(a) and 87204(a). An exit interview was held with Garcia. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with staff member Mareta Teku.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 6, 2024

"(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times..." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, dried feces and toilet paper were left on a backyard patio, which poses an immediate health and safety risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have the area cleaned by POC due date. Licensee shall send a photograph of the cleaned area by POC due date. vincent.moleski@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87204(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 6, 2024

"A licensee shall not operate a facility beyond the conditions and limitations specified on the license..." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and observation, two backyard studios were being used for habitation, despite not being approved for use by the fire department, code enforcement, and this facility's license.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to send LPA Moleski a written plan to address this deficiency by POC due date. vincent.moleski@dss.ca.gov

Aug 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPAs Moleski and Williams met with staff member Mareta Teku and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski attempted to reach the licensee and the administrator of this facility but could not reach either of them. LPA Moleski printed out an updated license reflecting an updated fire clearance and collected this facility's previous license. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was left with Teku.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024
Apr 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Wallace conducted unannounced required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with direct care staff and explained purpose of visit. Administrator's Certification 1/3/2025. LPA and direct care staff toured the interior and exterior of the facility including common areas, resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, staff room, kitchen, dining room, laundry area, and garage. LPA observed the facility to be clean and in good repair and to have sufficient furniture and lighting throughout. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. LPA observed locked sharps locked cabinet designated for medications. Chemicals (2 bottles of bleach and 1 gallon of bug spray) are not locked up in back area of property. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid flooring in all bathrooms. LPA observed locked toxins in the laundry room and a supply of linens/towels/blankets on hand. Fire extinguishers was last inspected 2/28/2024. The facility conducts fire/disaster drills with residents on 2/9/2024. Smoke/monoxide alarms are working order. LPA observed a complete First Aid kit on site and measured the hot water at 113.2 *F in the bathroom. LPA observed all doors to have alarms. LPA observed seating on patio, a locked shed, and two gates that were unlocked and accessible. There were tree branches and debris in back of property. Workshop was locked with a cat looking out. Facility sketch shows workshop, but licensee stated mom stays there occasionally. Two old refrigerators, two washers, and two dryers which need to be removed. LPA reviewed five resident files and three staff files, including criminal record clearances. A review of staff records indicates not all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks are Fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. LPA verified staff training for staff file reviews. LPA requested the following updated documents for community care licensing to be submitted via email by April 16, 2024: Updated Facility Sketch, New Fire Clearance, LIC 308 Designation of Administrator, LIC 500 - Personnel Report, LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan, Copy of Administrator's Certificate, and Copy of Liability Insurance. ruth.wallace@dss.ca.gov Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies are being cited. See 809-D's for citations. Immediate civil penalty of $500.00 was issued to facility. Failure to correct the deficiencies by the noted due date may result in an additional penalty being assessed. Exit interview conducted with direct care staff. Copy of reports and (LIC 811 Confidential Names) left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 10 documents

20236 state visits · 7 documents

Jul 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at this facility unannounced on 07/03/2023 at 8:45 AM to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Nadine Mills and Diana Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit is to follow up on resident's 1 (R1) Dental care plan and Dental visits. During case management visit LPA Martinez reviewed R1's facility files. LPA Martinez will continue to follow up with R1's Dental plan, and will return at a later date. Due to this visit, no deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2023
May 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at this facility unannounced on 05/24/2023 at 10:30 AM to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Nadine Mills and Diana Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit is to follow up on resident's 1 (R1) care plan and relocation plan. During case management visit LPA Martinez reviewed R1's facility files. It was learned R1 is a double amputee and requires a hoyer lift to be transferred to and from wheelchair and on and off hospital bed. In addition, R1 requires two persons to complete hoyer lift transfers. Moreover, R1 is not able to access their wheelchair because their wheelchair/hoyer sling is not the correct length. At this time, R1 is not able to transfer onto their wheelchair safely. Additionally, R1's assessment needs to be updated to reflect hoyer lift use. As a result, facility staff agreed to complete a reassessment, and obtained the proper equipment for transfers and wheelchair use. Moreover, at this time, R1 is able to turn and reposition in bed independently; however, if this changes, the facility was advised they would need a bedridden fire clearance approval. Furthermore, facility sketch will need to be updated. In addition LPA Martinez observed staff residing in a room that has not been designated as a staff room on the fire clearance STD 850 form. The home owner constructed a wall in the middle of room 4 to create an additional room. However, the wall is not complete and obstructs a window from opening. LPA Martinez will follow up with Sacramento Fire Department in regards to rooms 4 and 5. LPA will conduct a Case Management visit at another time to follow up on Fire Clearance regulations. Due to this visit, deficiencies were cited and can be found on the 809-D page. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 31, 2023

87463(a) Reappraisals: The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical, medical, mental, and social condition. This requirement was not met as evidence by: based on file review, the Licensee did not ensure to complete a reappraisal for R1 which includes hoyer lift need. This posed a potential health safety risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility staff agrees to complete a reappraisal for R1 by POC date 05/31/2023. Reappraisal will include hoyer lift. Reappraisal will be emailed to LPA Martinez by POC Date 05/31/2023 by 5 PM. Facility staff also agrees to assist with finding a new placement for R1. Placement plan shall be emailed to LPA Martinez by POC date 05/31/2023 by 5 PM.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87464(d) · Plan of correction due date: May 31, 2023

87464(d) Basic Services A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs... This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation, interviews, and file review, the Licensee did not ensure the were able to meet R1's transfer needs. This posed a potential health and safety risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility staff agrees to assist R1 with transfers and obtained a hoyer sling for R1 by POC date 05/31/2023. In addition facility staff agrees to implement a transfer care plan for R1 and assist R1 with repositioning and transfers. Facility staff agrees to email LPA Martinez repositioning and transfer care plan by POC Date: 05/31/2023 5 PM.

May 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Avelina Martinez and Pang Lee arrived at this facility unannounced on 05/19/2023 at 4:00 PM to conduct a case management visit. LPAs met with Nadine Mills and Charlotte Lewis and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit is to follow up on resident's 1 (R1) care plan and relocation plan. LPA Martinez obtained R1's needs and services, admission agreement, Health and Certification form, and Appraisals. LPA Martinez will review the above documents and continue to follow up the relocation of R1. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this 809 report, 809D page, and appeal rights form were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2023
May 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

A virtual Informal conference was conducted today on 05/16/2023 at 1:30 PM via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss complaint allegations and non-compliance concerns. Present in the meeting are Licensing Program Manager Czarrina Camilon-Lee, and Licensing Program Analyst Avelina Martinez, Ombudsman Randi Denning, Licensee Diana Garcia, and facility staff Charlotte Lewis. The informal conference process was explained during this meeting to include the Administrative process. Discussed Concerns: The following concerns were discussed: Facility deficiencies, medication errors, administrator changes, reassessments, fire clearance violations, elopements, and Technical Support Program (TSP). The facility has stated they will do the following to achieve continued and substantial compliance: Ensure facility has a full time assigned certified Administrator Ensure all staff are compliant with all required training (medication and reassessments) Ensure compliance with fire clearance Facility Administrator will ensure compliance plan is being followed Ensure all reassessments are being completed Submit LIC 500 Personnel document and LIC 308 Designated Responsibility document to Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) by May 22, 2023 Licensee Diana Garcia reported all facility plans to achieve compliance will be submitted to the Community Care Licensing Department by May 31, 2023 5 PM. Continued... Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) will do the following: Increase Monitoring Technical Support Program (TSP) referral The licensee was advised failure to follow agreed plan could result in a Non-Compliance Conference. No deficiencies were cited during today's meeting. An exit interview was conducted with facility representatives Diana Garcia, and a copy of this report was provided via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2023
May 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medications as prescribed. Staff did not provide adequate meals for resident.

On 05-05-2023 at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez conducted an unannounced facility visit in regards to open a complaint investigation with the above allegations and close the investigation. LPA Martinez met with Nadine Mills and Charlotte Lewis and explained the purpose of today's visit. During today's complaint investigation, LPA Martinez reviewed two medication files. Resident 1's (R1) Medication Administration Record (MAR) was not properly maintained. The May 2023 MAR sheet is missing medication entries for the following: Alodipine 5MG, Xarelto 20MG, Gabapentin 300MG, Omeprazole 20MG, Lisinopril 20 MG, Albuterol 0.083 % 3ML, Combivent Respimat AER BOE, Trueplus Ultra Thing 30G L, True Metrix Glucose. Furthermore, R1 has a 04/24/2023 doctor's order stating..."R1 has been treated to take Gabapentin 600 MG tablet take 1 three times a day." However, R1's MAR states Gabapentin 25 MG 1 tablet by mouth 3 times per day was administered. Continued... Substantiated R2's MAR entry for Olanzapine is incorrect. The MAR only has one entry for Olanzapine , which the resident has two separate orders for this medication. R2 has an order for Olanzapine 10MG tablets take one tablet by mouth in the Morning, the second order is to take one tablet by mouth at bed time. However, the MAR states Olanzapine Dose: 10MG take 1 tab by mouth in the morning and take 2 tablets at bed time. As a result, the facility is not following doctors orders and prescription bottle order labels. Additionally, R1's medication prescription bottles were found in Resident 3 (R3) medication box. LPA Martinez was informed by staff 2 (S2) that R1 had observed their medication in R3's medication box. In addition, R1 reported observing their medication in R3's medication box during a medication pass, and refused medication during this pass. R1 did not consume medication that was not prescribed to them. Moreover, During today's visit, LPA Martinez observed S1 serve R1 a prepared breakfast meal. The breakfast for today was toast, sliced hard boiled eggs, and fruit. LPA observed and heard R1 inform S1 that they could not eat toast and fruit due to a chewing food issue, which is an ongoing issue. R1 then proceed to eat part of the eggs, and left the rest. As a result, R1 was provided a meal that was not suitable for their care needs. As a result of this investigation, the Department finds these allegations to be Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the 9099 report, LIC 9099-D, and appeal rights were given to the facility. Also, please refer to May 5, 2023 809 report for additional deficiencies.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230501151100

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 11, 2023

87465(a)(4)Incidental Medical and Dental Care...A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility...The licensee shall assist residents with self administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation and file review, the Licensee did not ensure to assist R1 and R2 with their self administered medication as needed. This posed a potential health and safety risk to R1 and R2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility agrees to: conduct a medication audit by POC Date 05/11/2023. Medication Audit documentation should be emailed to LPA Martinez by 05/11/2023 by 5 PM.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 26, 2023

87555(b)(2) General Food Service Requirements:The following food service requirements shall apply:Where meal service within a facility is elective, arrangements shall be made to assure availability of an adequate daily food intake for all residents... this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation, the Licensee did not ensure R1 was provided adequate daily food intake during BF. This posed a potential health and safety risk to R1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility staff agrees to incorporate foods that R1 is able to chew. Staff also agrees to conduct a reassessment to include R1's new physical health status changes by POC Date 05/26/2023. Staff will email reassessment to LPA Martinez by POC date 05/26/23 5 PM.

May 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at this facility unannounced on 05/05/2023 at 8:30 AM to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Nadine Mills and Charlotte Lewis and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit is to follow up on learned deficiencies during a complaint investigation 27-AS-20230501151100. The facility did not maintain a current May 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for resident 1 (R1) and resident 2 (R2). In addition, R1's LIC 602 health certification form needs to be updated to reflect R1's physical health status change, and conduct a reappraisal to address R1's special diet needs. The following deficiencies was observed and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this 809 report, 809D page, and appeal rights form were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: May 11, 2023

Incidental Medical and Dental Care 87465(h)(6) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident...This requirement was not met as evidence by Based on observation and file review, the Licensee did not ensure R1 had a current MAR. This posed a potential health and safety risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility staff agrees to: conduct a resident file audit by POC Date 05/11/2023. file Audit documentation should be emailed to LPA Martinez by 05/11/2023 by 5 PM.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 8, 2023

Reappraisals 87463(a)The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate... This requirement was not met as evidence by. Based on observation, R1's appraisal was not updated to reflect R1's physical health status change. This posed a potential health and safety risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility staff agrees to incorporate foods that R1 is able to chew. Staff also agrees to conduct a reassessment to include R1's new physical health status changes by POC Date 05/26/2023. Staff will email reassessment to LPA Martinez by POC date 05/26/23 5 PM.

Apr 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez made an unannounced visit to this facility to conduct an annual inspection on 04/13/2023 at 8:30 AM. LPA met with Kohata Qalo and stated the purpose of today’s visit. LPA inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, laundry room, activity room, and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. Administrator holds current certificate. The facility is licensed for six non-ambulatory residents. There are currently six residents who reside at this facility. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for one resident. LPA Martinez toured the facility with Kohata Qalo on 04/13/2023 at 11:00 AM. LPA Martinez reviewed six out of six resident files, and the files were up to date. LPA Martinez reviewed four out of four staff files, and the files were up to date. LPA Martinez reviewed 2 out of 6 residents' Medication Administration Records (MAR). Resident 3 (R3) was missing a doctor's order for PRN Medication Acetaminophen 300 MG. In addition, Gabapentin 300 MG medication order label was altered with a black marker. Staff 1 also reported they altered the Gabapentin administration order label. In addition, March and April 2023 MAR states Gabapentin take 25 MG: 1 capsule by mouth 3 times per day. January 2023 MAR states Gabapentin 300 MG take 2 capsules 3 times per day. As a result, the facility will need to obtain an updated doctor's order for Gabapentin and correct April MAR. Resident 5 (R5) MAR was up to date. Continued... During the tour, it was observed R3 was residing in a non-designated resident room. Per License posted at Facility and per Fire Clearance form STD 850 Bedrooms four and five are not permitted for client use. The facility sketch will need to be updated, and bedroom change arrangements need to be implemented for R3. An immediate civil penalty was assessed on April 13, 2023 in the amount of $500.00 for fire clearance violation Title 22 regulation Fire Safety 87203. The facility smoke detectors, carbon detectors, and fire extinguishers are in good repair. Last fire drill was conducted in February 2023. The facility has a first aid kit. The facility common areas and resident bedrooms were furnished and in good repair. The facility bathrooms were sanitary, and water temperature measured at 106 degrees. The facility temperature measured at 75 degrees. The facility had an adequate food supply, and the kitchen was sanitary. The exterior of the home was maintained, and the emergency exit gate was clear of debris. As a result of this annual inspection, deficiencies can be found on the 809-D page. An exit interview was conducted, and copy of this report was provided to the facility. Also, a copy of the appeals rights document was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2023

20223 state visits · 3 documents

Oct 31, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident leaving the facility. Resident sustained a fall due to lack of care and supervision. staff did not provide medical attention in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility unannounced on 10/31/2022 at 1:47 PM to open a complaint and deliver findings, LPA Martinez met with Diana Garcia, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA Martinez conducted interviews and obtained facility records. On October 22, 2022, staff 1 (S1) left the residents unsupervised at 10:30 PM, and resident 1 (R1) eloped from the facility during this time. Law enforcement was called on October 22, 2022, and R1 was returned to the facility and later sent to the hospital on this day. R1 also, eloped from the facility on October 24, 2022 at 3 AM. R1 was returned to the facility by Law Enforcement on October 24, 2022. Moreover, on October 24, 2022, Law enforcement found resident 2 (R2) on the floor next to their bed. It is unknown how long R2 was on the floor, and R2 was not provided medical attention until Law Enforcement found R2. Continued... Substantiated During the October 24, 2022 incidents, it was learned S1 locked their bedroom door and went to sleep. On this day, Law Enforcement knocked on S1 bedroom door for a long period of time due to S1 being asleep and unresponsive. Per interviews it was learned S1 went to sleep at 12 AM, and left the residents unsupervised and without care. As a result of today's case management, on October 31, 2022 an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 has been issued for the violation of Section 87464 (f)(1). This immediate civil penalty was issued to the Licensee due to absence of care and supervision on October 22, 2022 and October 24, 2022 for R1's elopements. As a result of this investigation, the Department finds these allegations to be Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022 · control 27-AS-20221027090944

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2022

87464(f)(1) Basic Services: Basic services shall at a minimum include: Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and file reviews, the Licensee did not ensure resident 1 was supervised and provided care at all times on 10/22 and 10/24. which led to R1 eloping from facility. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct Basic Services training to all staff by 11/01/2022 by close of business 5 PM. Licensee will email training document and work schedule to LPA Martinez by 11/01/2022 by close of business 5 PM. Work on hiring an awake NOC shift staff. Email LPA Martinez hiring plans by 11/01/2022 by close of business 5 PM.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 14, 2022

Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities 87468.2(a)(4). To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met by evidence by: Based on file reviews and interviews, the Licensee did not ensure R2 was provided care and supervision which resulted in a fall.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct Personal rights training to all staff by 11/01/2022 by close of business 5 PM. Licensee will email training document and work schedule to LPA Martinez by 11/01/2022 by close of business 5 PM

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 31, 2022

87465(g) Incidental Medical and Dental Care:The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health...This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and record reviews The Licensee did not ensure R2 received timely medical attention after their fall. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to R2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct Incidental Medical and Dental training to all staff by 11/01/2022 by close of business 5 PM. Licensee will email training document and work schedule to LPA Martinez by 11/01/2022 by close of business 5 PM.

Apr 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived announced to conducted a Pre-Licensing Inspection of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Avelina Martinez met with Diana Garcia who assisted LPA Martinez in today’s pre-licensing inspection. Facility has a fire clearance for 6 non-ambulatory residents. Diana Garcia, will be the Administrator of this facility. The facility administrator’s holds a current administrator certificate and expires on 01/23/2023. LPA Martinez inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including: the common living spaces, resident bedrooms, bathrooms, and kitchen. The physical plant was sanitary and in good repair. The resident rooms were furnished and sanitary. The resident bathrooms had grab bars and in good repair. The kitchen contained an adequate food supply. The kitchen had plates, cups, an utensils. The facility has a laundry room and all hazards are locked. The facility has resident and staff files set up. The facility has a medication cabinet setup. The facility also has a first aid kit. The facility has all the required posting posted, such as, Administrator certificate, Ombudsman information, personal rights, complaint posting, and LIC 610E ETC. The facility smoke and carbon detectors were tested and in good repair. The facility fire extinguisher was in good repair. The exterior of the facility had a partial covered patio, which contains a patio table and chairs. The exterior emergency gate was in good repair. The facility has submitted a LIC 808 Covid-19 Mitigation plan. In addition, the facility has covid-19 posting throughout the facility. The facility has one central screening entry point. The facility has PPE. The facility will conduct cleaning daily. The facility has a designated area for visits. The applicant has passed the pre-licensing component of the application process. LPA Martinez will notify the Central Application Bureau (CAB) that the pre-licensing has been completed and passed. Component 3 was waived due to the fact that Diana Garcia has completed Component 3 for another facility, and is an active administrator for another facility. An exit Interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Diana Garcia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2022
Apr 15, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

COMP II by CAB successfully completed Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 0 Method: Telephone call with CAB COMP II Participants: Diana Garcia, Administrator/Owner; Shannon Betker, analyst. Applicant/administrator participated in COMP II at CAB via telephone call with analyst at CAB. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified by confirming driver’s license number. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of Title 22. Component II was successfully completed. Applicant and administrator were advised to email/fax signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID to CAB. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Staff qualifications and responsibilities 3. Staff training 4. Applicant and Administrator qualifications 5. Grievances, Complaints, Community resources 6. Food service 7. Medication management 8. Application document review and technical assistance: Pre-licensing inspectionthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2022

6 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 17, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Garcia, Diana, licensed since 2022.

Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Golden Legacy Elderly Care · Sacramento
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2022, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
30
Total complaints
5
Substantiated allegations
14
Type A citations
8
Type B citations
6

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2022, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations80
Type B citations60
Substantiated allegations140
Total complaints50

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Golden Legacy Elderly Care II

Is Golden Legacy Elderly Care II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Probationary License,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Golden Legacy Elderly Care II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Golden Legacy Elderly Care II been cited?

8 Type A and 6 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 30 state visits over the same years.

Is Golden Legacy Elderly Care II still open?

The state does not list this license as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

What does Golden Legacy Elderly Care II cost?

$4,350 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,550–$5,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,149 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $3,800 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Golden Legacy Elderly Care II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Garcia, Diana, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Sacramento is 1.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Golden Legacy Elderly Care II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Golden Legacy Elderly Care II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GOLDEN LEGACY ELDERLY CARE II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #342701152. The state lists this license as “Probationary License,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Garcia, Diana, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 30 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 8 Type A and 6 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 30 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 14 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Sacramento County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.1 mi

    Eastern Manor

    Mid-size home · licensed for 13

    Starting rate

    $3,800 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Carmichael · 0.9 mi

    Varta's Place

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,600 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,650

    On the state record

    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.7 mi

    American River Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,250 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.8 mi

    Aaa Advanced Adult Assistance

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,250 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200
    • Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.8 mi

    Aaa Advanced Adult Assistance

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,250 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200
    • Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.
  • Map

    Carmichael · 0.9 mi

    A1 Magnificent Home

    Small home · licensed for 5

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,250 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,250

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Sacramento County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
GL

Call Golden Legacy Elderly Care II

Sacramento · Licensed for 6

(916) 613-0647

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Golden Legacy Elderly Care II

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages