Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Golden Legacy Elderly Care
Small home·Licensed for 6·Sacramento, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,250 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,250
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 7, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitSeptember 9, 2026CDSS inspection record
- Licence holderGarcia, DianaSince 2021 · 2 licensed homes
Golden Legacy Elderly Care is a small care home in Sacramento — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Golden Legacy Elderly Care
Is Golden Legacy Elderly Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Probationary License,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Golden Legacy Elderly Care licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Golden Legacy Elderly Care been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is Golden Legacy Elderly Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
What does Golden Legacy Elderly Care cost?
$4,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,046 to $4,461 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Golden Legacy Elderly Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Garcia, Diana, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South Sacramento is 3.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Golden Legacy Elderly Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Golden Legacy Elderly Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “GOLDEN LEGACY ELDERLY CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #342701003. The state lists this license as “Probationary License,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Garcia, Diana, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN BDRM #6. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,250a month to start
Likely $3,450–$5,250
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,250a month
Likely $3,450–$5,450
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,250likely $3,450–$5,250
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,450
- $4,250
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,050–$8,600
- $6,250
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,550–$5,400.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Acc Assisted Living at Greenhaven TerraceSacramento · 2.0 mi · Mid-size home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Alaturi CareSacramento · 3.1 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Love and Serenity IISacramento · 3.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Meadows at Country PlaceSacramento · 3.4 mi · Mid-size home$6,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Greenhaven Place Independent Lvg and Assisted LvgSacramento · 3.8 mi · Mid-size home$2,995Listed on Seniorly · independent living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Yellow OrchidElk Grove · 4.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Maria Teresa Home CareSacramento · 4.5 mi · Small home$2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Immaculate Care HomeElk Grove · 4.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 1986 Leford Way, Sacramento, CA 95832Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 7, 2026.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 11
- Most recent visit
- September 9, 2026
- Occupied · July 7, 2026 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 27, 2025 to July 7, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations1typical 0
- Substantiated allegations1typical 0
- Total complaints3typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 11 documents
Jul 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: The Administrator is not present at the facility for a sufficient amount of time.
On July 7, 2026, at 1:30 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Avelina Martinez and Sulma Lopez arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. LPAs met with Torika Cowa and Diana Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPAs conducted interviews, file reviews, and facility inspections. Based on file reviews, it was learned that the administrator was present during 1 out of 5 facility inspection visits. Per the Licesnsee, the facility currently does not have an appointed Administrator resulting in significant lack of oversight on medication administration and the maintenance of facility records. LPAs observed the following concerns: medication refill supply is being stored with expired medication, not maintaining medication records (MAR), staff not refilling medication in a timely manner, and are not storing them properly,and medication destruction not being completed. Continued... Substantiated Per the Licensee they reported they did not attempt misrepresent the authenticity of LIC 602A. Due to the above noted information, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, and therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. Also, during a medication administration records review, it was learned that R1 missed their daily dose of Dulcolax 5 MG due to S1 not being properly trained on knowing where refill medication supply was being stored. As a result of this investigation, the Department finds these allegations to be Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D page, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this LIC 9099 report, LIC 9099-D page, and LIC appeal rights document were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260211142756
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 21, 2026
87405(a) Administrator - Qualifications and Duties:...administrator...shall be on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility...This requirement was not met as evidence by: based on observation, interviews, and file reviews, the Licensee did not ensure that the admin was present at the facility a sufficient amount of hours to complete management/administration duties. This posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026
Plan of correction: The Administrator shall be present in the facility 40 hours per week starting July 07, 2026. LIC 500 Personnel report shall be emailed to LPA Martinez by July 21, 2026 by 5:00 PM. Licensee will appoint a new administrator by POC date July 21, 2026.
Jul 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Avelina Martinez and Sulma Lopez arrived at this facility unannounced on July 07, 2026, at 1:30 PM to conduct a case management visit. LPAs met with Torika Cowa and Diana Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit today is in response to the following learned deficiencies: Incidental Medical and Dental Care. It was learned that the facility is not refilling resident medication in a timely manner, resulting in missed medications. Facility staff are also not maintaining the Medication Administration Record (MAR) accurately. Staff do not initial the MAR indicating that the medication has been administered. Additionally, there are medications present in the facility that are not being documented on the MAR. Medication destruction is not being completed. Based on this case management inspection, the facility will be cited the following deficiencies Incidental Medical and Dental Care 87465 (a)(6) and 87465 (4). These deficiencies can be found on the 809-D page.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 21, 2026
87465(a)(6) Incidental Medical and Dental Care- A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility...When requested by the prescribing physician or the Department, a record of dosages of medications which are centrally stored shall be maintained by the facility This requirement was not met as evidenced by based on interviews, observation, and file reviews, the licensee did not ensure that facility staff were maintaining accurate medication administration records. This posed a potential health risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility staff will conduct a medication audit by a medical professional by POC date July 21, 2026. Facility staff agrees to email LPA Martinez a copy of the medication audit report by POC date July 21, 2026 by 5:00pm.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 21, 2026
87465(a)(4) Incidental Medical and Dental Care- A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility...The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by based on interviews, observations, and file review, the licensee did not ensure that facility staff were assisting residents with medication administration as required. This posed a potential health and safety risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility staff will conduct a medication audit by a medical professional by POC date July 21, 2026. Facility staff agrees to email LPA Martinez a copy of the medication audit report by POC date July 21, 2026 by 5:00pm.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(i)(1-4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 21, 2026
87465(i)(1-4) Incidental Medical and Dental Care- Prescription medications… which are not returned to the issuing pharmacy… or which are otherwise to be disposed shall be destroyed in the facility by the facility administrator and one other adult who is not a resident... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on interviews, observation, and file reviews, the licensee did not ensure medications were properly disposed and destructed. This posed a potential health and safety risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility staff will conduct an in service medication destruction training by a medical professional by POC date July 21, 2026. Facility staff agrees to email LPA Martinez a copy of the in service training document by POC date July 21, 2026 by 5:00pm.
Feb 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On February 20, 2026 at 11:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA Martinez met with Diana Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to discuss an Administrator change. LPA Martinez requested the following documents: Letter from the Licensee requesting to appoint a new administrator to the facility. Copy of current administrator certificate Any documentation that meets the education and/or experience requirement LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 200 signed by the Licensee or Designee. (update Administrator section) LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 501 Personnel Record Fingerprint and association documentation (Guardian Report) Please email document to LPA Martinez by February 23, 2026, by 5:00 PM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2026
Oct 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA Valerio was met by facility staff Kertia Bryan, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Valerio called Licensee Diana Garcia and left a voicemail. LPA Valerio sent an email to licensee notifying her of LPA's arrival. After LPA Valerio conducted the facility tour, interviewed residents, and interviewed staff, LPA was met by Licensee Diana Garcia. LPA Valerio toured the facility too ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. Upon arrival, LPA Valerio observed one staff on shift and six residents. Staff was preparing breakfast in addition to assisting residents with activities of daily living. To ensure each resident was given a fresh plate of food, staff assisted the resident one by one as each resident woke up for the day. Breakfast was pineapples, strawberries, blueberries, ham breakfast sandwich with toasted buttered bread, scrambled eggs, water, and hot coffee. LPA observed three residents awake and three residents sleeping at the start of the visit. LPA Valerio observed resident bedrooms to be fully furnished and free from odors. Resident bathrooms were observed to fully stocked with hygiene supplies. The fire extinguisher was last service on 03/03/2025. The facility thermostat was set to 67 degrees, which was within the regulatory range. The facility door alarms were observed to be in working condition. The facility common areas were observed to be clean, fully furnished, free from odors, and organized. LPA Valerio observed the exterior plant. LPA observed facility fences to be in good repair and no emergency exits were obstructed. Continues on LIC 809 - C... Continued from LIC 809 LPA Valerio observed the kitchen area. The facility was observed to have an adequate food supply and an emergency supply of food. Inside the refrigerator, LPA observed boxes of insulin on the side of the fridge next to food items. There was a lock box located inside the fridge; however, it was full. Licensee stated she will get a bigger lock box for the medications that need to be refrigerated. During the visit, licensee ordered a bigger lock box and showed LPA that it would be delivered today. Technical assistance was given for this observation. LPA Valerio reviewed three (3) staff files and three (3) resident files. Staff files were up to date with required training. Resident files were up to date with required annual documentation and assessments. LPA Valerio and Licensee Diana Garcia discussed the staff to resident ratio and meeting all the residents needs. Licensee Diana stated she is working on getting another staff hired to work in the home, in addition to the live in care staff. LPA Valerio provided guidance on Title 22 regulations and answered Licensee Diana questions regarding volunteers. LPA Valerio requested the following documentation: Administrator Certificate, Administrator CEU/training, LIC 500, LIC 308, LIC 610D, and copy of liability insurance. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22, technical advisories were provided to licensee Diana Garcia. No citations were issued during today's visit. An exit interview was held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2025
Jun 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not administering resident's medication as prescribed
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Lund met with Care Staff Asena Motubula and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Lund called Licensee Diana Garcia who could not make the visit because of an emergency and gave permission for Care Staff Asena Motubula to sign required paperwork. Census: 5 Staff are not administering resident's medication as prescribed - LPA Lund reviewed facility records and interviewed staff. Residents (R1) LIC602A dated 3/5/2025 has a list of medications that R1 is prescribed. LPA Lund reviewed the medications and the medication that R1 stated that is supposed to be taking is not one of the prescribed medications on the list. LPA Lund was not able to interview R1becasue R1 is no longer a resident of the facility and doesn’t the whereabouts of R1. Unsubstantiated Based on facility records reviewed, and interviews with staff on the information provided, it was unclear if staff are not administering resident's medication as prescribed, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. As a result of this investigation, this Department finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250318163724
Jun 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Lund met with Care Staff Asena Motubula and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Lund called Licensee Diana Garcia who could not make the visit because of an emergency and gave permission for Care Staff Asena Motubula to sign required paperwork. Census: 5 Unlawful Eviction - LPA Lund reviewed facility records and interviewed staff. On 3/28/2025 Resident (R1) signed acknowledgment of self-discharge. The facility didn’t serve R1 with any notices. LPA Lund interviewed staff who stated that R1 wanted to leave the facility. LPA Lund was not able to interview R1becasue R1 is no longer a resident at the facility. Unsubstantiated Based on facility records reviewed, and interviews with staff on the information provided, it was unclear if unlawful eviction, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. As a result of this investigation, this Department finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250411131803
Jun 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to do a case management visit. LPA Lund met with Care Staff Asena Motubula and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Lund called Licensee Diana Garcia who could not make the visit because of an emergency and gave permission for Care Staff Asena Motubula to sign required paperwork. Census: 5 LPA Lund reviewed facility records that indicate that the is Staff (S1) is the Administrator for the facility. LPA Lund interviewed Staff and residents in care. LPA Lund also spoke with S1 who had not worked at the facility since mid-April 2025. When speaking with S1, was not aware that S1 was the Administrator for Golden Legacy Elderly Care & Golden Legacy Elderly Care 11. Licensee Diana Garcia never notified S1 that S1 was the Administrator for both facilities. Licensee also never notified community care licensing or turned in the required paperwork to change the administrator when S1 stop working at the facility in mid-April 2025. Deficiencies were cited during today's visit. Exit interview held and copy of the report and a copy of the appeal rights left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 30, 2025
All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. The licensee and the administrator may be one and the same person. The administrator shall have sufficient freedom from other responsibilities and shall be on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility..... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: S1 who was the Administrator on record has not worked at the facility since mid-April 2025. which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee Diana Garcia will turn in required paperwork for Administrator.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87207 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 7, 2025
False Claims No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee Diana Garcia never notified S1 that S1 was the Administrator for both facilities.which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee Diana Garcia will go over the regulation and email LPA Lund stating she understands the regulation.
Jul 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA met with facility staff Kimberly Sloan, and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Diana was contacted via phone and arrived later during the visit. LPA and facility staff toured the physical plant to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed resident bedrooms to be clean and free from odors. Staff bedroom was observed to be clean and fully furnished. Water temperature reads 105° F in the bathroom and room temperature reads 73° F. LPA observed the facility to have adequate food supply. The facility common areas were clean and furnished. Smoke and carbon detectors were in good repair. Fire extinguisher had a last check on 05/24/2024. Medications, sharps, and toxins were locked away and inaccessible to residents in care. No emergency exits were observed to be obstructed. Residents were observed eating breakfast, which was waffles, sausage, scrambled eggs, and coffee, watching the Olympic games on television, playing solitaire, and completing ADLs. Staff was observed cleaning the facility, preparing meals, completing chart documentation, and engaging with the residents. LPA Valerio reviewed two (2) staff and three (3) resident files. Resident files were observed to be complete with required annual documentation and care plans. Staff files were observed to be complete The last emergency drill was conducted on 05/20/2024. LPA Valerio requested the following annual documentation be sent by 08/02/2024: LIC 500, LIC 308, LIC 610, and copy of Liability Insurance Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22, no deficiencies were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Garcia, Diana, licensed since 2021, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Golden Legacy Elderly Care II · Sacramento
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Asap Care
Sacramento · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$4,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Carolyn Mitchell's Loving Care Home
Sacramento · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$4,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A Family Affair Care II
Sacramneto · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$4,050 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Amazing Grace Elder Care #2
Sacramento · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Muirfield A Home for the Elderly
Sacramento · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,100 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A Family Affair Care I
Sacramento · Small home · 1.1 mi away
$4,100 a month to start · Covelight estimate