Small home · Licensed for 6 · Murrieta
New Hope Residential Elder Care II
30221 Powderhorn Lane, Murrieta, CA 92563Licensed since 2017
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 4 residents
- Bedriddenup to 6 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
GE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for New Hope Residential Elder Care II: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,550a month to start
Likely $3,700–$5,600
From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,550likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,550likely $3,700–$5,600
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$5,800
- $4,550
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,000
- $7,050
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes13 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,200 to $5,600
13 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,500–$5,550.
- Angel's Haven Care Assisted LivingMurrieta · 0.6 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Senior Haven of MurrietaMurrieta · 0.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Murrieta Manor: Senior LivingMurrieta · 1.0 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Agate ManorMenifee · 1.8 mi · Small home$5,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sarah's Best LifeMurrieta · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aloha Home CareMurrieta · 1.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- We R EvergreenMenifee · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- New Hope Residential Elder Care IIIWinchester · 2.2 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Home AthenaWinchester · 2.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A & A Family Care for the ElderlyMurrieta · 2.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- TLC Care HomeMurrieta · 2.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Home Bachelor PeakWinchester · 2.9 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Concord Estates Assisted LivingMurrieta · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
30221 Powderhorn Lane, Murrieta, CA 92563Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of MurrietaHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.7 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #336427427 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 7 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure there was adequate supply of food available for residents
On July 23, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Ivashia Wright, arrived unannounced at the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA met with the Caregiver, Viva Gregorio. The LPA introduced themselves and explained the purpose for the visit. Administrator Annie Jane Mikenas arrived shortly after. LPA interviewed staff, Administrator, Witness and requested documentation. LPA also inspected the existing food supply. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not ensure there was adequate supply of food available for residents, it was reported that there is a concern for the amount of food available and the food may be insufficient to meet nutritional needs for all six residents. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiated Interview with Annie, the Administrator, stated she has been shopping multiple times for the facility. Annie reported the facility goes shopping on Saturdays, but staff has been requesting more food. Annie stated staff doesn’t want to order too much food because residents hardly eat and do not want food to go bad. Information obtained from interviews with staff stated grocery shopping days were Thursdays and Sundays. Information obtained from interview with R1’s responsible party corroborated that there was a food shortage at the facility. R1’s responsible party stated she believes that there is now a variety of perishable food available. Although the LPA observed that the facility contained the 2-day perishable food requirement, the facility did not have the 7-day non perishable food available to meet the needs of the residents. Based on witness interviews, staff interviews, facility records, and LPA observations, the allegation staff did not ensure there was adequate supply of food available for residents is deemed substantiated. A substantiated finding means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. A copy of this report, LIC 9099D, LIC 421FC, and appeal rights are being provided to Administrator Annie.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260716111403
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 24, 2026
87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not as evidenced by: Based on observation, Licensee did not ensure the food supply for the number of residents, the facility has failed to meet the required supplies of maintaining on the premises nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator to certify that the facility will maintain nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week. Proof of correction must be submitted to LPA Wright by 5pm on 7/24/2026.
Jun 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure there was adequate food for residents
On June 29, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Ivashia Wright, arrived unannounced at the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA met with the Caregiver, Viva Gregorio. The LPA introduced themselve and explained the purpose for the visit. Administrator Annie Jane Mikenas arrived shortly after. LPA interviewed staff, Administrator and requested documentation. LPA also inspected the existing food supply. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not ensure there was adequate food for residents. LPA did not observe sufficient food to meet the 2 day perishable, 7 day non-perishable mandated by regulations. Interview with Administrator Annie informed LPA that she was out of the country. Annie stated staff were to call her son for grocery needs every Friday. Annie stated there is no menu provided to residents due to residents having different food options and needs. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiated Information obtained from interviews with staff stated grocery shopping days were Saturday or Sundays. Interview with additional Staff stated they notified the son of grocery needs but too many things were needed and son couldn't supply all grocery needs. Staff did corroborated that the Administrator was out of country and that the son of the Administrator was responsible for providing grocers for the facility. Based on staff interviews, facility records, and LPA observations the allegation that staff did not ensure there was adequate food for residents is deemed substantiated. A substantiated finding means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. A copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights are being provided to Administrator Annie.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260625162431
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 30, 2026
87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not as evidenced by: Based on observation, Licensee did not ensure the food supply for the number of residents, the facility has failed to meet the required supplies of maintaining on the premises nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator to certify that the facility will maintain nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days. Proof of correction must be submitted to LPA Wright by 5pm on 6/29/2026.
Mar 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivashia Wright conducted an unannounced visit for a required annual inspection. The LPA was greeted by the Caregiver Vina Gregorio, notified her of the purpose for the visit and was allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. At the time of the visit, there were two (2) staff members and five (5) residents present. Administrator Annie Mikenas arrived shortly after. Facility Overview: The facility is a single story building with four (4) residents bedrooms, one (1) staff bedroom, two (2) bathrooms, a dinning room, a family room, a kitchen area and a shed. There is no gated pool and there are no firearms on the premises. Infection Control: LPA observed that hygiene and cleaning supplies were available for regular facility maintenance. The facility’s infection control plan was reviewed and found to meet department requirements. Physical Plant: The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. Laundry equipment was in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked in the kitchen area and inaccessible to residents. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were in good working condition. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be in compliance with the department requirements and with an expiration date of 2/25/2027. The water temperature was tested within regulations measuring at 110.2 F Continued 809-C.. Food Service: The facility’s kitchen was clean and equipped to prepare food. The facility maintained the required two-day supply of perishable foods and a seven-day supply of non-perishable foods. Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff were present to supervise clients during the visit. The administrator holds both a current administrator’s certificate and cpr certificate. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed files for Three (3) staff members, confirming criminal clearances, updated training, and CPR/First Aid certification. Three (3) resident files were reviewed and contained all required documentation. Health-Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: All resident medications were securely locked. LPA reviewed medications for four residents, confirming that all medications were listed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and accounted for. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last fire/earthquake drill conducted on 1/29/2026 and 1/30/2026, which met department requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was reviewed and provided to Administrator Annie Mikenas..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit for a required annual inspection. The LPA was greeted by the Caregiver Vina Gregorio, notified her of the purpose for the visit and was allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. Facility Overview: The facility is a single story building with four(4) residents bedrooms, one staff bedroom, two(2) bathrooms, a dinning room, a family room, an office and a kitchen area. There is no gated pool and there are no firearms on the premises. Infection Control: LPA observed that hygiene and cleaning supplies were available for regular facility maintenance. The facility’s infection control plan was reviewed and found to meet department requirements. Physical Plant: The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. Laundry equipment was in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked in the kitchen area and inaccessible to residents. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were in good working condition. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be in compliance with the department requirements and with an expiration date of January 24, 2026. The water temperature was tested within regulations measuring at 109.5 F Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff were present to supervise residents during the visit. The administrator holds a current administrator’s certificate with expiration date of July 1, 2025 and a CPR certification with the expiration date of February 17, 2025 Continued 809-C...... Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed files for two(2) staff members, confirming criminal clearances, updated training, and CPR/First Aid certification. Three (3) residents' files were reviewed and contained all required documentation. LPA observed first kit to be locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. The residents files were kept in a locked cabinet in the office area and staff files were kept in a locked cabinet in the hallway and inaccessible to unauthorized individuals Health-Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: All residents' medications were securely locked in a cabinet and located in the kitchen area. LPA reviewed medications for two(2) residents, confirming that all medications were listed and accounted for. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last emergency drill conducted on 02-5-2025, which met department requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was reviewed, and a copy was provided to Caregiver Vina Gregorio.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple scratches while in care. Resident not administered medication as prescribed. Medication not locked in a cabinet.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kathleen Banrasavong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Jane Mikenas where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews with staff members and residents, and records review. On 08/11/2021, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging Resident sustained multiple scratches while in care, Resident not administered medication as prescribed, and medication not locked in a cabinet. In regards to the allegation of the medication not locked, LPA interviewed Administrator, Jane Mikenas and she denied the allegation. Administrator stated that facility always locks the medications in the hallway door. LPA interviewed the staff members, who stated that the medications are always locked in the hallway closet. LPA made observation during her subsequent visit that confirmed medications are stored and locked in a centrally stored location in the hallway. The initial visit made by a previous LPA was not able to confirm or deny this allegation during the initiation of the complaint in 2021. Unsubstantiated In regards to the allegation that Resident sustained multiple scratches while in care. LPA was not able to interview Resident 1 (R1). R1 passed away on 08/15/2021. LPA interviewed Administrator who stated that there were no incidents that occurred where any facility staff member scratched the resident. LPA interviewed staff members who worked at the facility in 2021, who stated that they handled R1 with care and denied scratching R1. LPA interviewed residents who have been at the facility since 2021. Information obtained from residents indicated there was no issues with staff or care and supervision during the entirety of their residency at the facilities. LPA was unable to contact a representative from Arbor Hospice to obtain additional information. LPA reviewed the notes from hospice agency, which did not indicate any abnormal scratches. In regards to the allegation that residents are not administering medication as prescribed, LPA interviewed Administrator stated that staff review doctor’s orders and the medication is given to the residents on time, every day. Information obtained from interviews with staff members who worked at the facility in 2021 indicated that staff administer resident’s medications following doctor’s orders. Residents currently placed at the facility indicated no issues with receiving their medications as prescribed. LPA was unable to contact a representative from Arbor Hospice to obtain additional information. During the LPA’s record review, Medications Administrator Records (MARS) appeared to have been provided and filled out correctly. LPA also reviewed R1’s Centrally Stored Medication log. No additional documents were able to be reviewed due to the time frame since R1’s passing. Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review, the allegations that R1 sustained multiple scratches while in care, R1 not administered medication as prescribed, and medication not locked in a cabinet is unsubstantiated due to the inability to interview pertinent parties and review pertinent documentation. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegations may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to the Administrator, Jane Mikenas.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024 · control 18-AS-20210811145213
Mar 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted a required annual visit. LPA was greeted and was granted entry and met with Licensee, Jane Mikenas, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At time of visit there were (6) clients and (3) staff present. The facility is a one story home with licensed capacity on the first floor with (5) bedrooms and (2) bathrooms. The facility does not have a pool or fire arms. The facility is a residential care facility for the elderly serving elderly ages 60 and above. LPA observed the following: Infection Control: LPA observed hand hygiene supplies, PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. The facility has a infection control plan on file. Physical Plant: Physical plant, floors, windows, and doors were observed to be clean and fixtures and furniture were present and in good repair. The facility's outdoor area was observed to be free of hazards. Laundry equipment was observed to be in good working condition. The carbon monoxide detector were operational. Food Service: LPA observed facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. LPA observed the facility met the required food items. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed staff files and training along with CPR/First Aid. Client files were reviewed and possessed all required paperwork. Health Related Services/ Incidental Medical Services: All client medication was locked in a hallway closet. LPA reviewed client medications and found that MARS and medication had discrepancies. LPA observe medication #1 (M1) was not punched but was documented on MARS as given. Medication #2 (M2), and Medication #3 (M3) and Medication #4 (M4) were documented as given, but the medication was still observed in the bubble pack on this date. Medication #5 (M5) indicated to have given for (7) days, had been ordered by the physician to be given for (5) days. Based on staff interviews, medication errors occur and staff are trained every (3) months. The deficiency was cited for medication administration and plan of correction was created. Disaster preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility's emergency and disaster plan. LPA reviewed documentation showing last fire drill conducted on 2/2/2024. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report, LIC809-D, LIC811, appeal rights and LIC9098 were reviewed and provided to, Licensee, Jane Mikenas.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024
Earlier years2022 · 1 document
20221 state visit · 1 document
May 13, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janira Arreola made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection focused on infection control. LPA was greeted and granted entry by S1, and met with Licensee Annie Jane Mikenas who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At the time of visit there was 3 staff and 5 residents present. The facility currently has zero positive or suspected Covid-19 cases. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility and made observations regarding the infection control measures that the facility has implemented. LPA observed Covid-19 postings at the facility. A single entry point was designated where symptoms screenings and temperature checks occur daily for all visitors, residents, and staff. LPA advised Licensee to document temperatures for staff, visitor and residents. This will be documented on an LIC9102TA. The facility had a plan in place to monitor residents regularly for any changes in condition. The facility had an adequate amount of hand hygiene supplies (soap, hand sanitizer, paper towels) in all restrooms. Common areas such as dining rooms and activity rooms have been modified with social distancing and masking policies. There are designated isolation rooms and a plan in place to monitor and attend to those in the isolation rooms. LPA observed a sufficient 30-day supply of PPE equipment. The facility also has a designated infection control lead and a plan in place to clean and disinfect the highly touched surfaces. LPA was provided with a copy of the facility Mitigation plan and Licensee will submit this to the department by 5/16/2022 5:00pm. During the tour of the facility LPA and Licensee observed the following deficiencies: · LPA requested a current resident roster LIC9020. The facility did not have a resident roster. LPA was given a typed up list of residents that was outdated with 2 residents (R1 and R2) that had expired. LPA also noticed R3 who had passed away “a couple weeks ago” per S1 was not on the typed sheet. · LPA observed PRN medication in the refrigerator that was not locked in the designated lock box. · LPA reviewed SIR log and noticed the last SIR was dated in 2017. LPA inquired with Licensee about SIR’s including death reports for R1, R2 and R3. Licensee was able to show proof of SIR's submitted for R2 and R3 but not for R1 who had expired more than 7 days ago. · LPA observed observed S2 and S3 on LIC500 who were not associated to the facility. S2 is cleared but not associated and worked at the facility per Licensee. This a zero tolerance related regulation. Licensee will receive a civil penalty of $500. S2 does not posses a background clearance and is listed as a staff member on LIC500. For this Licensee will be issued a civil penalty of $500. Civil penalties will total $1000. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report, and appeal rights were provided to facility licensee, Annie Jane Mekinas.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2022
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 23, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
New Hope Residential Elder Care II LLC, licensed since 2017.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2017, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 7
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2017, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about New Hope Residential Elder Care II
Is New Hope Residential Elder Care II licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is New Hope Residential Elder Care II licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has New Hope Residential Elder Care II been cited?
2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.
Is New Hope Residential Elder Care II still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does New Hope Residential Elder Care II cost?
$4,550 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$5,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 14 other homes of a similar licensed size in Murrieta that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 14 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does New Hope Residential Elder Care II take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by New Hope Residential Elder Care II LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Murrieta is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can New Hope Residential Elder Care II keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
New Hope Residential Elder Care II license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “NEW HOPE RESIDENTIAL ELDER CARE II LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #336427427. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to New Hope Residential Elder Care II LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 7 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Riverside County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Riverside County