Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Rolling Green Senior CareLicense #331880541 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareRolling Green Senior CareLicense #331880541 · 42007 Thoroughbred Ln, Murrieta, CA · (951) 397-3369Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Riverside County/Murrieta/Rolling Green Senior Care
Map · 42007 Thoroughbred Ln

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,300/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (951) 397-3369

    From the state licensing record · October 27, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

RG

Call Rolling Green Senior Care

Murrieta · Licensed for 6

(951) 397-3369

From the state licensing record · October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Murrieta

Rolling Green Senior Care

42007 Thoroughbred Ln, Murrieta, CA 92562 · Licensed since 2018

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Rolling Green Senior Care

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,300 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 27, 2026
  • Languages spoken: EnglishReported on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Hospiceup to 6 residents

Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 27, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 27, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Rolling Green Senior Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,300a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,300

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,300likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,500–$5,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,500
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,150–$8,700
$6,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverWe have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,200 to $5,600

$3,200$5,600

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,350–$5,550.

  • Coastal Haven LivingMurrieta · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on its own website · semi-private room · seen October 5, 2026
  • Pacifica Living CenterMurrieta · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Murrieta Home CareMurrieta · 1.4 mi · Small home
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Heritage Residential Care 2Murrieta · 1.4 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sarah's Great LifeWildomar · 3.0 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Boundless Care for the ElderlyMurrieta · 3.1 mi · Small home
    $5,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mc Board & CareWildomar · 3.5 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Motherly CareWildomar · 4.2 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • A & A Family Care for the ElderlyMurrieta · 4.3 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ailida Retirement HomeMurrieta · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • TLC Care HomeMurrieta · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (8)Room types · Laundry · Wifi
  • Room typesSemi-Private

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Wifi

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • AmenitiesPiano or Organ

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (7)Dining style · Special diets supported · All-day or flexible dining
  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Special diets supportedNo Sugar · Low / No Sodium

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Cultural cuisine regularly servedInternational

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Residents can cook in their own unit

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (3)Activity types offered · Trips outside the home · Religious services off site
  • Activity types offeredBBQs or Picnics · Birthday Parties · Live Dance or Theater Performances · Live Well Programs · Live Musical Performances · Holiday Parties · and 2 more

    BBQs or Picnics · Birthday Parties · Live Dance or Theater Performances · Live Well Programs · Live Musical Performances · Holiday Parties · Community Service Programs · Activities On-site — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language (2)Clergy or chaplain visits · Languages spoken by caregivers
  • Clergy or chaplain visits

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved (1)Transportation costs extra
  • Transportation costs extra

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Where it is

42007 Thoroughbred Ln, Murrieta, CA 92562Address from the public record · October 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Southwest Healthcare Rancho Springs HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.1 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 27, 2026 · License #331880541 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 6 of 17 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Mar 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 3/4/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Flores conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering an amended version of an original report for complaint control number 18-AS-20250924084053. LPA met with Staff Florence Ezeh and was granted entry into the facility. LPA explained to staff Florence the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA Flores did not observed any health and safety concerns; no deficiencies were issued nor were civil penalties accessed per California Health & Safety Code and Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was discussed with Staff Florence Ezeh and provided to Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026
Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provided adequate meal service Staff installed video surveillance in resident's room without proper authorization Staff do not allow residents to contact emergency services

On 2/12/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Flores conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering the investigative findings into the allegations listed above. LPA Flores met with Administrator Gertrude Okoro and explained to Gertrude the purpose of the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of observations, interviews, and records review. Information received alleged staff are not providing adequate meal services to the residents in care. Upon LPA’s initial visit, LPA observed the food to be sufficient in supply that met the requirement of the (2) two-day supply of perishable foods but food lacked in nutritional value to meet the residents nutritional needs. Foods observed in the facility refrigerator consisted of primarily processed foods, and very little fresh produce. LPA reviewed the facility menu, Resident #2 (R2) breakfast ranged from (1) one corn dog, (4) four chicken nuggets, salami and bread, and frozen burritos. Interviews with (4) four out of (4) four residents reported that meals provided to residents are primarily frozen meals or are processed foods. (Continue to LIC9099C: Substantiated...) Substantiated (Continuation from LIC9099: Substantiated) Residents report that meals are rarely home cooked are unhappy with the quality of food being provided. LPA Flores conducted an annual visit to the facility in December of 2025. During the annual visit in December of 2025, LPA Flores issued deficiencies for not maintaining food of nutritional value. Information received alleged staff installed video surveillance in resident’s room without proper authorization. Witness #1 (W1) provided the department with photo proof of the locations of the surveillance cameras. Upon LPA’s initial visit, LPA observed that the camera were removed from the residents bedrooms where it was reportedly installed. LPA Flores and LPA Mixson observed camera mounts and wiring where the camera was once present. LPA interviewed (4) four out of (4) four residents. (3) Three out of (4) four residents reported observing the cameras present but were not given informed consent to have the camera’s in the room. Interview with Resident #1 (R1) stated that they informed Staff #1 (S1) of wanting the camera to be removed from their bedroom but were ignored. A review of the (4) four residents admission agreements detailed that surveillance will be implemented in residents rooms if it was deemed necessary for safety precaution. Interviews with S1 confirmed that video surveillance was implemented for safety concerns. S1 further explained that R1 mental health concerns may place R1 at a health and safety risk which is why the camera’s were implemented in R1’s room. Although R1 may have given written consent during the time of admission, R1 may verbally withdraw the consent at any time. Furthermore, R1 resides in a shared bedroom with R3. Interview with S1 further confirmed that there were no health and safety concerns that would allow the camera’s in the bedrooms for (3) three out of the (4) four residents residing in the facility. The implementation of surveillance camera’s in all resident bedrooms imposed upon the personal rights to privacy to all residents. Information received alleged staff did not allow Resident #1 (R1) to contact emergency services. Interviews conducted with Staff #1 (S1) believed the allegation stemmed from an incident with R1 explaining that R1 has a history of behavioral episodes resulting to R1 frequently contacting emergency services on numerous occasions. S1 reported that there were occasions when R1 contacted emergency personnel every five minutes. S1 reports that upon law enforcement arrival, law enforcement instructed to take away R1’s personal cell. With the authorization of R1’s child, the cellphone was taken away. (Continue to LIC9099C: Substantiated) (Continuation from LIC9099C: Substantiated) R1 is overseen by a public guardian. S1 stated that they do not recall informing R1’s conservator of removal of R1’s personal cellphone and advised that family members were made aware and were in agreement with S1. Interviews with Resident #1 (R1) confirmed that their personal cellphone was taken away from them without any explanation. R1 reported that they were also denied access to the facility phone to make any personal telephone calls. LPA attempted to speak with R1’s conservator and children to confirm they were informed and authorized S11 to remove the cellphone from R1’s possession, but attempts were unsuccessful. Therefore, the allegations of staff do not provide adequate meal service, staff installed video surveillance in resident's room without proper authorization, and staff do not allow residents to contact emergency services are deemed substantiated. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid as the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. A citation will be issued in accordance with Title 22 Division 6 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided, along with a copy of LIC9099C (2), LIC9099D, and Appeal Rights were provided. (Continuation from LIC9099A: Unsubstantiated) R1 reports that staff will at times offer the residents an additional blanket to keep warm. Interview with Resident #2 (R2) reports that they often run hot and facility has not made proper accommodations when they inform staff that they feel hot. R2 reports that the facility has provided a fan to R2 but does not find it to be accommodating as staff will not shut the windows. R2 reports that staff will not lower the air conditioning temperature for R2 when they request for the thermostat to be lowered. Resident #4 (R4) did not wish to answer LPA’s questions and LPA concluded the interview with R4. Interview with Staff #1 (S1) reported that the facility temperature will be set at 78 degrees Fahrenheit. S1 stated that when they learned that residents were cold, residents were assisted with putting on sweaters or covering up with blankets. S1 stated that when residents begin to run cold, staff will attempt to adjust the temperature to an appropriate temperature to what is suitable for the outside weather conditions and to be accommodating for every resident. S1 stated that R2 tends to run hot and they have provided R2 with a fan. S1 further explained that they do not lower the air conditioning for R2 as it would affect R1 and R3 as they run cold. Therefore, the allegation of facility did not maintain a comfortable temperature for resident's in care is deemed unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Administrator. (Continuation from LIC9099AC: Unsubstantiated) A review of R4’s medical assessment does not report any mild cognitive intellectual disabilities. Through observations, LPA observed the bedroom doors to be equipped with a single sided deadbolt with the locking mechanism on the inside of the residents room with the key insert on the outside of the bedroom door. Through observations, the door could shut closed if the resident wanted privacy, the door can be pulled open by grabbing onto the deadbolts locking mechanism. Interviews with (2) two out of (2) two staff reported that residents have never been locked in their rooms. Therefore, the allegation of staff lock residents in their rooms is deemed unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026 · control 18-AS-20250924084053

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2026

(a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To have a reasonable level of personal privacy in accommodations ..., personal care and assistance.." This requirement was not met with evidence by: (3) three out of (3) three residents bedroom were equipped with surviellance cameras and residents were not given informed consent permitting the cameras which posed a potential health and safety risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026

Plan of correction: The cameras were immediately removed. Administrator agreed to complete an out-service training pertaining to residents personal rights. The training certificate will be submitted to LPA via email by close of business on 2/26/2026.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(14) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2026

(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (14) To have reasonable access to telephones, to both make and receive confidential calls. This requirement was not met with evidence by: (1) out of (4) four residents were not given access to their personal cellphone which posed a potential health and safety risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to complete an out-service training pertaining to residents personal rights. The training certificate will be submitted to LPA via email by close of business on 2/26/2026.

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/30/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Flores conducted an unannounced 1-year required annual inspection. LPA met with staff Florence Ezeh and explained to Florence the purpose of the visit. LPA was granted entry and conducted a tour of the facility. LPA observed the following during today's visit: The facility is a single-story structure which consisted of (2) two staff bedrooms, (3) three resident bedrooms, (2) two bathrooms, living room, kitchen, garage, laundry room, and backyard. The backyard was observed to have a covered patio that was fully furnished. Indoor/outdoor passageways were free from obstructions. Facility maintained a (2) two-day supply of perishable foods but did not maintain a (7) seven-day supply of non-perishable foods. Kitchen was kept clean and free of vermin. Perishable foods observed were not of nutritional value; perishable foods maintained were of processed food items. Knives and other sharp materials were stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. LPA observed an unlocked cabinet which stored disinfectants and other cleaning solutions. LPA was informed that the cabinet is kept unlocked until the end of the day. Medication was centrally stored in a locked cabinet in the hallway. Resident bedrooms were equipped with the required bedding, furniture, and functional lighting. Shower and toilet area was equipped with the required grab bars and shower was equipped with a slip resistant material. LPA observed activities available for residents like books, puzzles, and games. The dual carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were tested and observed to be fully operable. LPA observed a cabinet in the hallway which stored additional linen and towels. LPA observed a fully functioning washer and dryer to provide residents with laundry services. (Continue to LIC809C) (Continuation from LIC809) Facility maintained a facility cellphone that connected to the internet and equipped with a camera for resident-use. Per staff Florence, there are no firearms and/or ammunition on the premises. LPA conducted (4) four out of (4) four resident records review. Records review included but not limited to dental information, pre-placement assessments, admission agreements, physician reports, and needs and service plans. LPA conducted a review of (2) two out of (2) two staff records. Records included but not limited to fingerprinting, background clearance, personnel report, health screening, TB results and first-aid/CPR certification. LPA did not observe (20) twenty hours of annual training for Staff #1 (S1). Upon speaking with S1, LPA was advised that the training's had not been completed due to lack of time. LPA observed postings of the LTCO, See Something Say Something, Personal Rights, Emergency Disaster Plan, Facility License, and Administrator Certification. During today's visit, LPA observed multiple health and safety concerns. Therefore, deficiencies will be issued in accordance with Title 22 Division 6. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to staff Florence, along with LIC 9099C, (2) LIC9099D, and appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Dec 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to provided medical attention for a resident in care.

On December 10, 2025, the Department of Social Services staff conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to continue investigation of the above allegations and to deliver findings. The Department was met by Staff Florence Ezeh, and subsequently, spoke with Administrator via telephone and the purpose of the visit was explained. Investigation consisted of the following: On August 1, 2024, the Department conducted an unannounced initial visit to the facility to investigate the complaint allegations mentioned above. During the visit, it was determined that the complaint required further investigation. On December 10, 2025, the Department requested and obtain the following documents:Staff Schedule (dated 9/25/25), Client Roster (dated 9/25/25), R1's Physician's report (dated; 4/30/25) Pre-placement appraisal, (dated 5/2/21), Physician's order (dated 12/19/23) Wound care--WoundTech notes (dated 8/16/24) Page 1 of 3 Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility staff failed to provide medical attention for a resident in care. The detail of complaint alleges that the board and care staff are neglecting R1 due to a foot wound. On December 10, 2025, at 1:27pm, the Department interviewed Gertrude Okoro (A1) who denied the allegation stating “R1 always receive medical attention when needed. A1 further stated that "yes, there are times when R1 would refuse wound care service, but our staff always comes back to him and encourage him to have services done. R1 would come around and except the service” On December 10, 2025, between 3:00pm and 4:00pm, the Department interviewed 2 staff (S1-S2) regarding the allegation. Of those interviewed, 2 out of 2 denied the allegation stating that R1 has never been neglected and that R1 refuses services sometimes, but they continue to try to persuade R1 to allow them to help him. On December 10, 2025, between 2:30pm and 3:30pm the Department interviewed 3 Residents(R2-R4); R1 refused to be interviewed. Of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 stated that staff treat them well and when they get a wound staff take care of it. Page 2 of 3 On December 10, 2025, the Department reviewed and evaluated the following documents: R1’s physician’s report dated (4/30/25), Home health (Wound care of California) dated 8/16/24. The documents reveal that R1 has wound care services in place. The department also reviewed shift notes which indicate when R1 refuse services. Based on the information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above; Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. There were no deficiencies cited during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240724163221

20241 state visit · 1 document

Nov 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kathleen Banrasavong arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. Upon arrival LPA was greeted by facility staff and granted entry. LPA began inspection with introduction and visit purpose. Upon arrival LPA learned that six (6) residents live at this facility, however there were five (5) residents present at the time of the inspection. There was two (2) staff members present. The Administrator, Gertrude Okoro was advised of the annual and conducted and completed the facility tour. Client Records/Incident Reports/Clients Rights Information: LPA reviewed client records. Six (6) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed for identification and emergency information, admission agreement, medical assessment, and TB test results, needs and service plans, placement, functional assessment, centrally stored medication/destruction records, safeguard for personal property/valuables, and personal rights notification. Personnel Records/Training/ Staffing/ Administration: LPA reviewed employee records. Two (2) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed employee records for first aid certification, criminal record clearance or an exemption, health screening and TB test results, employee rights, training verification, and current administrative organization. Gertrude Okoro, Administrator’s certificate expiration date was 12/21/2025. Food Service: Food prep areas are clean and organized. Food supply meets the requirement of one (1) week supply of nonperishable and two (2) day supply of perishables. Emergency food and water supply is present. There is a location for sharps in the kitchen. Physical Plant and Safety of Environment/Operational Requirements: LPA toured the facility inside and outside. LPA observed the facility to be clean and in good repair. The facility is maintained at 75 degrees for the client’s comfort. Lighting is sufficient for safety. Water temperature measured 108.0 degrees F. Laundry is done in the hallway designated laundry room. There is a locked location for storing laundry soap, cleaning supplies and chemicals in the closet in the hallway. All outdoor and indoor passageways are free of obstruction. Emergency lighting is available. There is a telephone working at this location. LPA dialed the facility’s landline number, which rang and was operable. The LIC 610, emergency disaster plan is maintained. There are no firearms at this facility. There is one (1) secured fireplace at this facility. There are zero (0) pools at the facility. There is one (1) secured gate that has a self-latching lock located on the northeast side of the house. LPA observed emergency supplies and one (1) first aid kit. The last emergency fire drill was conducted on 11/01/2024. Infection Control: The LPA observed the hand washing stations in the facility restrooms and kitchen had hand hygiene supplies and hand washing signs. LPA observed PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan which met department requirements. LPA reviewed staff records and found that staff had infection control training. Medications/Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are centrally stored. There is a locked cabinet allocated for medication storage. Centrally stored medication and destruction logs are maintained separately. LPA reviewed medication logs and observed that they were dispensed accurately. LPA made observation throughout the inspection process to assess if the facility remains in conformity with the State Fire Marshall regulations. LPA observed seven (7) smoke detectors and one (1) carbon monoxide detectors throughout the facility. There were two (2) fire extinguishers on site, date charged was 12/12/2023. Pursuant to Title 22 of The California Code of Regulations Division 6, there are zero (0) deficiencies observed. An exit interview was conducted, this LIC 809 was reviewed with, and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, Gertrude Okoro.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2024

20231 state visit · 1 document

Dec 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/4/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chinwe Nwogene arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Nwogene was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver, Leocardia Ogolla who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Leocardia called the Licensee, Getrude Okoro who arrived at the facility shortly after. At the time of visit there was Two #2 staff and five #5 residents present. LPA toured the facility inside and out with Leocardia Ogolla. Tour included: Kitchen: LPA toured the kitchen and observed kitchen to be clean. Food is stored in a safe and healthful manner. Utensils and dishware are sufficient for the census. The refrigerator and stove are in working order. Sharps are stored in a locked kitchen drawer, available only to authorized individuals. Trash cans has tight-fitting lid. Fridge, freezer, and all need appliances were present and shown to be in working condition and clean. Dining and Livingroom; LPA toured the dinning and Livingroom area. LPA observed area to be clean and furnitures in good condition. Temperature was 68 degrees Fahrenheit. Hallway: LPA toured the hallway and observed hallway to be clean with no pathway obstruction. LPA inspected the fire extinguisher and found it to be in compliance. Carbon monoxide & smoke detector were tested and functioning properly. LPA observed additional linens and hygiene items. Medication: LPA observed medications were labeled and stored in separate bins inside of a locked closet and are distributed according to physician orders. The first aid kit was complete. Continue on LIC809-C Continued from LIC809. Bathroom: LPA toured hall bathroom and observed bathroom to be clean and equipped with grab bar. There is also a good number of personal toiletries available for the residents in care. The hot water measured at 134 degrees Fahrenheit which is above regulatory standard (citation will be issued). Bedroom: LPA toured three # out of #3 resident bedrooms and observed bedroom to be clean and furnished according to regulation, which includes proper furniture, dressers, chairs and lighting. Resident #1 bedroom has a private bathroom. LPA observed bathroom to be clean and hot water was measured at 124 degrees Fahrenheit. Garage: LPA tour the garage and observed garage to be clean and not cluttered. Laundry: Washing machine and dryer are all in good repair and sufficient for the census. Cleaning supplies are stored away in the laundry room, inaccessible to clients. Backyard: LPA toured the backyard and observed backyard to be clean and furnitures in good condition. The backyard was free from obstruction and the side gate remain unlocked. No bodies of water were observed. Food Services: There are seven days non-perishable and two days of perishable food supply present, and all food was properly stored and available to residents. The fridge and freezer are large enough to accommodate required perishable foods. Records: All staff present have a criminal record clearance in file and are confirmed as being associated with the facility. Three #3 staff and #3 residents' records were reviewed. All required postings, including COVID’s postings, were posted near the entryway and throughout the facility. The administrator certificate expires on 12/21/2023. Interview; two staff and three residents were interviewed. Therefore, based on the observations made during today’s visit, one #1 deficiency will be cited per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. See LIC809-D. An exit interview was conducted, and this reported was provided along with appeal rights to Getrude Okoro.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 11 documents

20233 state visits · 4 documents

Jul 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident had a comfortable bed.

On July 7, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived to the facility unannounced and met with the Lead Caregiver. The visit was conducted in order to provide the findings for the investigation pertaining to the listed allegation. On April 13, 2023, LPA Venus Mixson initiated the complaint investigation. During the investigation, LPA Mixson and LPA Stephanie Martinez conducted interviews with the Administrator, Staff Members, and Residents. On April 11, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL), received information which stated staff did not ensure resident had a comfortable bed. It was reported that Resident's bed was unplugged which caused Resident's mattress to be deflated. Interviews revealed that there are no beds at the facility that can deflate. It was reported that one of the resident's bed was unplugged for a period of time, but the Resident was not in the bed during the time. Information obtained from Resident's who were directly affected, indicated that there were no concerns regarding their bedding. No issues or concerns regarding resident's bed was advised. Based on interviews and observation, this agency has investigated the allegation of staff did not ensure resident had a comfortable bed and we have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened, or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report, along with the LIC 811, was provided to the Lead Caregiver. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230411151529
Jul 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff serve expired food to residents in care.

On July 7, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson conducted a visit to the facility and met with the Lead Caregiver. The visit was conducted in order to provide the findings for the investigation pertaining to the listed allegation. On April 13, 2023, LPA Venus Mixson initiated the complaint investigation. During the investigation, LPA Mixson and LPA Stephanie Martinez conducted interviews with the Administrator, Staff Members, and Residents. On April 11, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL), received information which stated staff serve expired food to residents in care. It was reported that expired meat and milk was served to residents. Information obtained from staff and residents indicated there is no known information of residents being served expired foods. On April 13, 2023 and June 6, 2023, the food supply was inspected by LPAs and no expired foods were observed. Based on interviews and observation, the allegations that staff serve expired food to residents may have occurred, however is not supported or proven by evidence. Therefore, the allegation is "UNSUBSTANTIATED" at this time. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, along with the LIC 811, was provided to the Lead Caregiver. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230411151529
Jun 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCDeficiency pages: Type B, Type A

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced Plan of Care (POC) visit to confirm the whereabouts of Resident #1 (R1), as they were to return to the facility as apart of the plan of correction for complaint control # 18-AS-20230602124116. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Leocardia Ogolla, Caregiver. The administrator was available via telephone as they had a personal appointment, during the time of LPAs visit and was not able to come to the facility. LPA conducted a tour of the interior and the exterior of the facility, and observed the following deficiencies: LPA observed for Resident #1(R1) to not be at the facility and was informed that R1 was no longer at the facility. Department staff verified that R1 was at the hospital and that they are still ready to be discharged. The hospital staff reported that the Licensee Ms. Okoro is not engaging in attempts to discharge R1 back to the facility, as she is not accepting or returning their phone calls. Ms. Okoro confirmed that she has not picked up R1 from the hospital and claims that the window had not been repaired and that R1's bed was picked up by the insurance company, preventing from having R1 to return to the facility. Due to the POC not being corrected, the following deficiencies were not corrected by the POC due date of 6/7/23, nor at the time of LPAs visit. Civil Penalties are being assessed and will continue to accrue until correction has been submitted: Deficiency is being cited under Title 22 Regulation 87468.2. The POC was to accept R1 back at the facility by 6/7/23. In addition the Licensee was to work with the hospital to ensure that R1 was returned to the facility. Civil penalties are being assessed for the dates of 06/07/2023 to 06/09/2023 in the amount of $100 per day covering the notes days, for a total of $200.00. Civil penalties will continue to accrue at the rate of $100 a day until proof of POC, is submitted. -Department staff conducted an interview with the Ms. Okoro in regards to R1 returning to the facility. Per Ms. Okoro the POC was met as R1 was admitted to another facility, as she was contacted by another facility regarding R1. The department contacted the other facility and learned that R1 was not admitted and had not reported that they were admitting R1 to the facility. Department staff verified that R1 was still at the hospital. As a result the department was provided with false and misleading statements by the licensee Ms. Okoro, and is therefore being cited for false claims. -During the tour of the physical plant LPA observed for a double pane window in the master bedroom to be broken withe several sharp, and jagged pieces to be sticking out for both residents and staff to be cut and or injured. The window was reported to have been broken on 5/31/23. Ms. Okoro placed Resident #2 (R2) inside the room. R2 is able to ambulate with a walker, the broken window poses an immediate heath and safety concern. Deficiency cited. -LPA observed for all three (3) resident bedrooms to have camera's located in each corner above the bedroom doors. LPA explained that any form of video surveillance needs to be approved, and to have cameras in the resident bedrooms was a violation of their personal rights as well as privacy. In addition the use of cameras is not included in the facility's plan of operation. LPA did not observe any signed consents from the residents or their responsible parties consenting to the use of video surveillance. Per the Licensee, Ms. Okoro the cameras are used as a safety measure to keep an eye on the residents as they are a fall risk. Deficiency cited. Based on today's visit, deficiencies were observed in the areas evaluated and cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and listed on the 809D. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, 809D, and appeal rights were provided to Leocardia Ogolla, Caregiver.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87207 · Plan of correction due date: Jun 23, 2023

87207 False Claims No licencee, officer or employee nof a licensee shall make or dissemenate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the serives provided by the facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: 1 out of times the licensee stated that R1 was moving to another facility, and denied the hospital's phone calls, were to assist with a plan R1 back to the facility. This poses a potential heath, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2023

Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to make a personal statement of understanding about the importance of providing true and accurate information to the department, The statement is to include the potential risks and consquences of providing misleading/false claims, or statements. Proof is to be submitted to the department by 5pm on the due date indicated.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87468.2 · Plan of correction due date: Jun 23, 2023

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition.. residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To have a reasonable level of personal privacy..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2023

Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to have the cameras removed. The cameras were taken down at the conclusion of LPAs visit at approximately 2pm.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 10, 2023

Maintenance and Operation: (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, the Licensee did not ensure that 1 out of 1 time, the facility was in good repair, as the window was broken in the master bedroom on 5/31/23, leaving jagged and sharp edges exposed, to cut or injur anyone that comes in contact. This is an immediate health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2023

Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to have the window covered up with cardboard until the window can be repaired. In addtion, the licensee agrees to relocate R2 to another bedroom. Proof of correction is to be completed by 6/10/23 by 5pm.

Jun 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member is under the influence of a substance while providing care to residents. Staff do not provide adequate care to resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Martinez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to start the investigation into the above allegations. The LPA met with Administrator, Gertrude Okoro, and informed her of the purpose for her visit. The investigation included staff/resident interviews, records review, and records collection. The Department received a report alleging Staff One (S1) has consumed a narcotic in the presence of a resident in care. Staff and resident interviews reported having no knowledge of who S1 is. According to Administrator Okoro, no one by S1's name, has worked or resided in the facility. She reported no one by S1's name has visited the facility recently. Staff and resident interviews reported having no knowledge of any person being under the influence of any substance while in the facility. Therefore, due to insufficient information, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Unsubstantiated It was also alleged facility staff were not providing care to Resident One (R1). R1 was interviewed; however, refused to provide information regarding the matter. Staff interviews revealed R1 was provided assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and staff notes revealed R1 would occasionally refuse some services. Therefore, due to insufficient information, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. This report was reviewed with Administrator Okoro and a copy was provided. An exit interview was conducted; the Administrator reported she is unwilling to accept back R1 into the facility because the resident is a danger to staff and other residents in care. The LPA notified the Administrator a three-day eviction can be issued to R1, though approval would be required from the Department. This report was reviewed with Administrator Okoro and a copy, along with instructions on Appeal Rights, was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230602124116

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(20) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 7, 2023

Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities: (a)..residents in privately operated RCFEs shall have all of the following... rights: (20) To be protected from involuntary transfers, discharges, & evictions. A licensee shall not involuntarily transfer or evict residents for reasons other than those permitted... & shall comply w/ all eviction & relocation protections...This requirement wasn't met as evidenced by: Based on interview the Licensee didn't ensure R1 was free from an involuntary transfer. Okoro admitted to refusing to allow R1 to return to the facility. This posed a threat to the H&S of R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2023

Plan of correction: The Administrator stated she is refusing to accept R1 back into the facility. When asked for a plan of correction she requested the LPA adise on how to correct. The LPA informed the Administrator the facility has to accept R1 back and follow eviction procedures and properly transfer R1.

20223 state visits · 4 documents

Aug 11, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Office

On August 11, 2022, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Jazmond Harris and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson met with Administrator, Gertrude Okoro at the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Office located at 1650 Spruce Street, Suite # 200 in Riverside, CA. 92507. LPM and LPA explained the purpose of the meeting. The following was discussed in the meeting: The Riverside Regional Office received a Serious Incident Report (SIR) dated June 29, 2022 regarding a head injury to Resident #1. It was advised that Resident #1 fell and sustained a bruise, bump, and cut to the back of Resident #1's head. Facility staff contacted hospice care to advise of the incident, but did not contact emergency services for further evaluation. It was also reported that on July 21, 2022, Resident #2 fell and had bruising notated on the left orbital area. Facility staff did not indicate on the serious incident report that emergency medical services were contacted. Administrator denied medical services were contacted for the incident, due to no apparent imminent health concerns. LPM explained the importance of contacting emergency services for all head injuries. According to CCLD Regulations, 87465 (a)(1), Incidental Medical and Dental Care. This poses an immediate health and safety or personal rights risk to residents in care. Deficiencies will be cited. The Riverside Regional Office received a SIR regarding Resident #2 pertaining to an incident which occurred on July 14, 2022. It was reported that Resident #2 had a behavioral incident. Due to the behavioral incident, Administrator has increased supervision of the resident. No further concerns at this time. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of the report, along with the LIC 9099-d, 811, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 19, 2022

87465 (a)(1). Incidental Medical and Dental Care. The licensee shall arrange, for medical care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the Administrator did not contact emergency medical services for Resident #1 on 6/29/2022 and Resident #2 on July 21, 2022, regarding head injuries.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator states that the staff will be retrained on contacting emergency services and providing proper notification. Training documents will be provided. Administrator stated she will provide a written statement regarding her understanding of the regulation.

Aug 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On August 1 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit to address concerns regarding the facility reporting to Community Care Licensing (CCL) in a timely manner. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Administrator, Gertrude Okoro, introduced self, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Administrator and toured the facility for the purpose of conducting a Health & Safety inspection. No deficiencies were observed. LPA Mixson reviewed residents' files and pertinent documents were obtained. During this visit, LPA Mixson interviewed one staff. No residents were available for interviews. Staff interview revealed that on June 29, 2022, hospice staff was called for Resident #2 (R2). Hospice staff arrived and conducted an evaluation of R2. Pertinent documentation regarding the evaluation was obtained. Facility staff provided first aid. Facility staff did not report the incident to CCL until July 27, 2022. On July 27, 2022, the Regional Office was advised of an incident that occurred on July 14, 2022 regarding R4. The Murrieta Police Department and the Community Behavioral Health Assessment Team (CBAT), was called to the facility regarding R4's concerning behaviors. However, the facility did not report to CCL until July 27, 2022 which is a violation of Title 22 regulations. Deficiencies will be cited. An exit interview was conducted, and this report, along with the LIC 9099-D, LIC 811, and appeal rights were provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 8, 2022

87211(a)(1)(D) (a) Each licensee shall furnish a written report within 7 days of the occurrence of any event which threatens the welfare and safety of the resident. This requirement was not met as evidence by: The facility failed to report the incident to CCL within seven days.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that the facility shall take immediate action if a future incident occurs. All staff will be trained on reporting to CCL in a timely manner. This will be completed by POC date. Training logs will be provided to LPA upon completion.

May 10, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member made inappropriate comments to resident and emotionally abused resident. Resident was left in bed for an excessive amount of time.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility unannounced in order to initiate an investigation of a complaint with the above allegation(s). LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation(s) with Licensee/Administrator Gertrude "Trudy" Okoro. Below is a summary of the findings of this complaint: Regarding allegation "Staff member made inappropriate comments to resident and emotionally abused resident": LPA Colvin interviewed residents, staff, and other persons regarding the allegation. Interviews were inclonclusive regarding staff member's (S1) alleged inappropriate statements and emotional abuse towards resident(s). In an abundance of caution, Licensee/Administrator "Trudy" removed S1 from the scheudle on a temporary basis until a new resident that was clashing with S1 could adjust to living in a facility for the first time. According to all interviews, there is no longer any issue with S1, and all parties are comfortable with S1 returning to the facility. Unfortunately, LPA Colvin was unable to interview all residents (some sleeping) and S1, however, it is unlikely that these interviews would change the finings of this investigation. Unsubstantiated Based on interviews conducted and lack of any further evidence to support the claim, the allegation "Staff member made inappropriate comments to resident and emotionally abused resident" is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation "Resident was left in bed for an excessive amount of time": LPA Colvin interviewed residents and outside agencies who would have information relevant to the allegation. Additionally, LPA Colvin interviewed the reporting party, who clarified that the allegation included time that the residents were asleep overnight. LPA Colvin did not observe in interviews or record review any evidence that would suggest that resident(s) have been left in bed for an extended period of time, such as bedsores or pressure injuries. Therefore, due to lack of evidence, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee/Administrator Gertrude "Trudy" Okoro and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022 · control 18-AS-20220503084418
May 10, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On this date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate a complaint #18-AS-20220503084418. During today's inspection, LPA Colvin observed the following deficiencies: Accessible Chemicals: LPA Colvin observed the door for the laundry room and the garage to be propped open with a bottle of bleach. LPA Colvin observed other chemicals on the ground between the washing machine and dryer. Deficiency cited. Living Accommodations: During LPA Colvin's inspection of the facility. LPA Colvin observed that one of the resident bedrooms (the only single bed resident room) to not have a door. Instead, LPA Colvin observed a curtain hung up across the doorway to provide some element of privacy to the resident (R1). When LPA Colvin inquired about the missing door, Licensee/Administrator Gertrude "Trudy" Okoro stated that it was removed in order to be able to use a Hoyer Lift for the resident. Deficiency cited. Alterations to Building: During today's inspection, LPA Colvin observed a hidden office/bedroom adjoining the facility dining room. In this room, LPA Colvin observed a bed, which the Licensee/Administrator stated was used sometimes by her and sometimes by her husband. LPA Colvin inquired about when the changes were made to add this room, but the Licensee/Administrator was unsure. LPA Colvin requested a copy of the facility's building sketch, which was provided. LPA Colvin pointed out to the Licensee/Administrator that this room was not noted on the sketch, and therefore, must have come after the facility was licensed. There is also no note of the room in the Pre-Licensing inspection done on 11/28/18. Community Care Licensing (CCL) was not notified of the change and updated facility sketch was not provided to CCL to update the facility's file. Deficiency cited. LPA Colvin additionally inquired about if the facility obtained a building permit for the room . Licensee/Administrator was unsure if a building permit was obtained, and could not provide LPA Colvin with a copy of any permit. Deficiency cited. Due to observations made by LPA Colvin, the facility was cited and deficiencies are noted on the LIC809D page(s). LPA Colvin conducted an exit interview with Administrator/Licensee Gertrude "Trudy" Okoro, and a copy of this report, LIC809Ds, and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 11, 2022

Storage Space: (a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, the Licensee did not comply with the above requirement with at least one area of the facility. LPA Colvin observed a bottle of bleach to be propping open the doors for the laundry room and garage. This is an imemdaite safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to remove chemicals from accessiblity of residents. Licensee to tour facility and ensure all potentially hazardous chemicals are locked. Licensee may self-certifiy to LPA Colvin once complete.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87307(a)(2)(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 11, 2022

Personal...Services: (a)...shall be large enough to provide...privacy for the residents...(2) Resident bedrooms shall...at a minimum,...(A) ...be large enough to allow for easy passage between and comfortable usage of...other required items... and any resident assistant devices... This was not met by: Based on interviews and observations, the licensee did not comply with the above regulation with one resident. LPA Colvin observed that R1's bedroom is missing a door and only a curtain is hung to provide some privacy. Licensee states this is due to Hoyer Lift. This is an immedaite personal rights violation of R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to do one of the following: Move R1 to a larger room which will accomodate their medical equipment, OR replace the door on R1's room (can be another style of door which is less obstructive to equipment). Licensee to provide plan and proof of correction to LPA Colvin.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87305(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 24, 2022

Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities: (a) Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and lack of records, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with one room of the facility. LPA Colvin observed an addition to the facility (office/bedroom). Licensee states they do not have proof of building permit. This is a potential safety hazard to staff and residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to contact the City Planning Department to ensure the addition is on file and approved. Licensee to also contact County Code Enforecment to have the addition inspected for compliance. Licensee to provide LPA Colvin with approval from City and County agencies for the addition.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87208(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 24, 2022

Plan of Operation: (a) Each facility shall have and maintain a current, written definitive plan of operation...Any significant changes...shall be submitted to the licensing agency for approval... This requirement was not met by: Based on observation and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with one aspect of the Plan of Operation. LPA Colvin observed that the facility sketch did not include the added office/bedroom. This is a potential safety hazard to residents and staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit udpated Facility Sketch to LPA Colvin, which includes all buildings/rooms and their stated purpose. Plan of Correction due date is 5/24/22.

20212 state visits · 3 documents

Dec 20, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medications are accessible to residents in care. Residents are not receiving assistance with incontinence needs. Staff do not respond to residents' call for assistance. Staff are not assisting residents' with hygiene needs. Facility does not provide meals of the quality and quantity to meet the needs of the residents. Facility is not disposing of expired or abandoned medications. Facility does not have adequate food supplies on hand. Refrigerated foods are not stored properly

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George arrived at the facility unannounced to commence a complaint investigation as well as to deliver findings for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver Traci Brown and explained the purpose of the visit and element of the allegation. The Administrator was unavailable to meet due to being out of the country. Medications are accessible to residents in care. At 12:43pm LPA observed the closet in the hallway that stores the residents medications to be unlocked. There is also a key hanging on the upper right-hand side on the outside of the door. One (1) of the three (3) residents are ambulatory and could access the medications. The allegation of Medications are accessible to residents in care is SUBSTANTIATED. ***Continued on 9099C Substantiated Residents are not receiving assistance with incontinence needs. Based on interviews conducted the allegation of Residents are not receiving assistance with incontinence needs is SUBSTANTIATED. Information provided that at the time of LPAs visit resident had not been assisted with being changed for the day and it was 1:32pm. LPA inquired about what happens during the night and feedback provided was that staff do not come to the resident bedrooms. Staff do not respond to residents' call for assistance. LPA conducted interviews the information provided was that during the night, staff are not responding to the bells when they are rung. Due to only one staff being on during the evening, and per the facility program plan the night staff is expected to be awake. However, it was reported that that during the evening staff are not responding when assistance is requested. Additionally, it was reported that staff are not making their rounds during the evening. Therefore, the allegation of Staff do not respond to residents' call for assistance is SUBSTANTIATED. Staff are not assisting residents' with hygiene needs. Staff reported that the residents are given their baths in the morning after they wake up and if there was an “accident” depending on the severity an additional bath is given. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed resident files two (2) of the three (3) residents are not receiving any outside services such as home health or hospice. It is solely the facility staff responsibility to assist residents with their hygiene needs. It was reported that there are no showers being given, not even bed baths, just a wipe down, and when it does happen it isnot thoroughly. It is important to note that the two non-ambulatory residents do need two staff to assist them, however there is only one staff on during the shift at a time. Based on the information provided the allegation of Staff are not assisting residents' with hygiene needs is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility does not provide meals of the quality and quantity to meet the needs of the residents. Information provided was that the food being served is old, rotten, and cold. LPA observed a container of Macaroni and Cheese that expired on December 4, 2021. During interviews conducted it was shared that the meals used to be complete and would be stored in the freezer and taken out for mealtimes, however due to the residents not liking the precooked meals, the meals were no longer precooked. LPA was informed that chicken is rarely served, that it is normally sandwiches and overall terrible. The allegation of Facility does not provide meals of the quality and quantity to meet the needs of the residents is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility does not have adequate food supplies on hand. At the time of LPAs visit there was a full deep freezer, a cabinet and refrigerator with food in the garage as well as a refrigerator inside of the kitchen. The supply was more than the 2 day supply of perishable and a 7 day supply of nonperishable food items. The vegetables (green onion, tomato) were fresh. However, In addition, food is reported to have been brought from the food bank, as well as staff are bringing food in with them from the store or fast food restaurants to ensure that the residents are being served complete meals. An example provided of if dinner is supposed to be grilled chicken then it would be grilled chicken, with mashed potatoes, but no veggies to accompany the main course. The allegation of Facility does not have adequate food supplies on hand is SUBSTANTIATED. Facility is not disposing of expired or abandoned medications. LPA observed five (5) maroon containers sitting in the corner on the inside of the living room that contained medications of previous residents. LPA inquired as to what the plan is for the medications, staff on duty did not know. Additionally, there were not any medication destruction records available for review. The allegation of Facility is not disposing of expired or abandoned medications is SUBSTANTIATED. Refrigerated foods are not stored properly. At 12:35pm LPA toured the kitchen and observed a bowl of potato salad and a bowl of peaches left uncovered inside of the refrigerator. Based on observation the allegation of Refrigerated foods are not stored properly is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, 9099D and appeal rights was provided to Caregiver Traci Brown.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021 · control 18-AS-20211214124454

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 21, 2021

Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services: Centrally stored medications shall be kept in a safe locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees. LPA observed medication in staffs room to be accessible to clients and visitors. Based on observation this requirement is not met as evidenced by the closet being unlocked 1 out of 1 times. This poses an immediated health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to provide training to all staff on the importance of keeping all medications locked at all times when not in use. POC is due by 5pm on the due date indicated.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(9) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 4, 2022

87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (9) Procedures which protect the safety, acceptability and nutritive values of food shall be observed in food storage, preparation and service. Based on observation the licensee did not properly store food on 2 out of 2 times. This poses a potential health and saftery risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct an inservice on proper food storage by the 5 pm on the due date indicated.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87625(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 4, 2022

87625 Managed Incontinence (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: 2) Ensuring that incontinent residents are checked during those periods of time when they are known to be incontinent, including during the night. Based on interview the licensee did not ensure that resident was checked at least 1 out of 1 time., this poses a potential health, and saftery risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have staff document in resident logs that checks and incontinent care has been completed. The POC is due by 5pm on the due date indicated.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569(c)2 · Plan of correction due date: Jan 4, 2022

Health and Safety Code section (c) "Care and supervision" means the facility assumes responsibility for, or provides or promises to provide in the future, ongoing assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered. Assistance includes assistance with taking medications, money management, or personal care. Based on interviews the licensee did not assist resident when requested. This poses a potential health, safety or person rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

Plan of correction: The Licensee agrees to conduct an inservice on care and service, as well as review job descritption. Proof is to be submitted by 5pm on the due date indicated.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 4, 2022

87464 Basic Services (4) Personal assistance and care as needed by the resident and as indicated in the pre-admission appraisal, with those activities of daily living such as dressing, eating, bathing and assistance with taking prescribed medications, as specified in Section 87608, Postural Supports. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview the licensee did not assistance 2 out of 2 residents with their hygiene needs, this poses a potential health safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to create a shower log. Proof of correction is to be be submitted to the department by 5pm on the due date indicated.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 4, 2022

87555 General Food Service Requirements: (b) The following food service requirements shall apply:(26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: based on observation and interview the licensee did not ensure adequate food supplies on hand at minimum 2 out of 2 times. This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit receipts according to facility menu posted to ensure the residents are served complete meals. Proof of correction is to be submitted by 5pm on the due date indicated.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 4, 2022

87555 General Food Service Requirements: (a) The total daily diet shall be of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents and shall meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council. All food shall be selected, stored, prepared and served in a safe and healthful manner. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview the licensee did not ensure meals of quality and quantity are being served on 1 out of 1 time. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct an inservice on blood borne pathogens Proof of correction is to be submitted by 5pm on the due date indicated.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(i) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 4, 2022

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (i) Prescription medications which are not taken with the resident upon termination of services, not returned to the issuing pharmacy, nor retained in the facility as ordered by the resident’s physician and documented in the resident’s record nor disposed of according to the hospice’s established procedures or which are otherwise to be disposed of shall be destroyed in the facility by the facility administrator and one other adult who is not a resident. Both shall sign a record, to be retained for at least three years, which lists the following: This requrement is not met by Licensee having 5 containers full of medication the need to be destoryed. This poses a potential risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to dispose of medication. Medication destruction record will be submitted to the dept by 5pm on the due date indicated.

Dec 20, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a case management visit in conjunction with complaint 18-AS-20211214124454. At the time of LPA visit a series of several beeps or chirping, were heard throughout LPAs visit. The beeping or chirping was coming from multiple smoke detectors throughout the facility located inside of resident and staff bedrooms, hallway and common areas. Due to the non-operable smoke detectors a deficiency is being cited, and immediate civil penalties of $500 are being assessed according to the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, appeal rights LIC421IM was provided to Caregiver Traci Brown.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1548(c)(2)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 21, 2021

Civil penalties;..:(c) The department shall assess an immediate civil penalty of five hundred dollars ($500) per violation...citation for any of the following serious violations:2) (A) Fire clearance violations, including, but not limited to...inoperable smoke alarms, and inoperable fire alarm systems. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation in at least 3. LPA George obeserved non-operational smoke detectors in various locations: Bedrooms, hallways and common area. This is an immediate safety risk to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to replace all smoke detectors in facility by 5pm on the due date indicated.

Oct 7, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection focused on infection control. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Licensee Gertrude Okoro and explained the purpose of the visit. At the time of visit there was 1 staff and 3 residents present. The facility currently has zero positive or suspected Covid-19 cases. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility and made observations regarding the infection control measures that the facility has implemented. LPA observed Covid-19 postings posted throughout the facility. The facility has an adequate amount of hand hygiene supplies (soap, hand sanitizer). Staff were also observed wearing appropriate face coverings (N95 mask). The facility has a plan in place to monitor residents regularly for any changes in condition, which includes daily temperature checks two times a day. The facility will contact the resident's physician should there be event of any COVID-19 related illnesses. The facility has a covid-19 binder that staff, residents and visitors can refer to ask questions arise. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Licensee Gertrude Okoro.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2021

4 of 6 beds were occupied at the February 12, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Rolling Green Senior, Inc., licensed since 2018.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
21
Total complaints
7
Substantiated allegations
12
Type A citations
2
Type B citations
9

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations20
Type B citations90
Substantiated allegations120
Total complaints70

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Rolling Green Senior Care

Is Rolling Green Senior Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

How many residents is Rolling Green Senior Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

Has Rolling Green Senior Care been cited?

2 Type A and 9 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. Those records count 21 state visits over the same years.

Is Rolling Green Senior Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does Rolling Green Senior Care cost?

$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 14 other homes of a similar licensed size in Murrieta that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 14 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Rolling Green Senior Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: we have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Rolling Green Senior, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Southwest Healthcare Rancho Springs Hospital is 2.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Rolling Green Senior Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

Rolling Green Senior Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROLLING GREEN SENIOR CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #331880541. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Rolling Green Senior, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • 21 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 9 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. The same records count 21 state visits in that period.
  • 7 complaints and 12 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is March 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Riverside County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Murrieta · 0.4 mi

    Vineyard Place

    Large community · licensed for 82

    Starting rate

    $4,400 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Murrieta · 1.1 mi

    Coastal Haven Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $5,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Murrieta · under 0.1 mi

    Rolling Green Villa

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150
    • Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.
  • Map

    Murrieta · 0.7 mi

    Excel Assisted Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Murrieta · 1.1 mi

    Pacifica Living Center

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $3,200 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Murrieta · 1.3 mi

    Murrieta Gardens

    Large community · licensed for 126

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,100 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $2,400–$3,950

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Riverside County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
RG

Call Rolling Green Senior Care

Murrieta · Licensed for 6

(951) 397-3369

From the state licensing record · October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Rolling Green Senior Care

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages