Sapphire Senior Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #315920037, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated February 18, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

13 homes in view

Sapphire Senior Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Roseville, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #315920037, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
667 Grider Drive · Roseville, Placer County
Phone
(279) 900-8903
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (4).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 11 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 18, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
February 18, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 9, 2024 to February 18, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not abide to the admission agreement

On 2/18/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke with care giver S1 who notified Natalia Tulenenova. Natatia arrived for LPA to investigate and to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records and conducted interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. R1 was admitted to te facility while in hospice care on 11/22/25. R1 passed away on 11/25/25. R1's belongings were removed from the facility on 11/25/26 . To date, R1's representaives were not reimbursed for the balance for fees paid for Nov. 2024. Therefore R1's representative is owed a refund As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - Report reviewed with Natalia . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260212093422
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility was not kept free of pests Staff did not treat residents with respect Facility was not kept free of mold Staff is not able to communicate with residents

On 7/8/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with xxx xxx. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. During inspections no pests were observed and Administrator denied that there has ever been a pest problem. Residents interviewed stated they had not recalled having been spoken to harshly. Mold was not observed by LPA to be present on surfaces. During past and recent inspections, LPA observed staff to have adequate language proficiency to communicate with residents. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview with administrator. Unthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250515100934
Jul 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to contact resident's conservator that resident was taken to the hospital.

On 7/8/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Natalia Tuleninova, Administrator, to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. Documents and conservator's office statement showed that Admin failed to notify the conservator's office as required for R1's hospitalization. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed with Admin . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250519143314
Feb 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yells at resident in care.

On 5/9/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Administrator. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. It was alleged that staff were hear to yell and swear at R1 in two different occasions while R1 was outside on the facility property with staff. R1’s records indicate that R1 is wheelchair dependent and has memory loss due to cognitive decline. When interviewed by LPA, R1 stated on multiple occasions that R1 does not go outside and that staff treat R1 respectfully. R1 stated that R prefers to stay in bed and that staff meet R1’s care needs. Interviews with staff also found that R1 rarely wishes to leave R1’s room despite staff encouragement to do so. Staff interviewed stated that they had not witnessed R1 being mistreated. Interviews with other residents of the home found they hadthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240326134435
Mar 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file11typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026111202545120243302023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (279) 900-8903

Is Sapphire Senior Care licensed?

Yes — Sapphire Senior Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #315920037, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 18, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Sapphire Senior Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sapphire Senior Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (4).

How much does Sapphire Senior Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sapphire Senior Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sapphire Senior Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Sapphire Senior Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on February 18, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sapphire Senior Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 11 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2023 for Sapphire Senior Care; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 18, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not abide to the admission agreement
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 2/18/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke with care giver S1 who notified Natalia Tulenenova. Natatia arrived for LPA to investigate and to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records and conducted interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. R1 was admitted to te facility while in hospice care on 11/22/25. R1 passed away on 11/25/25. R1's belongings were removed from the facility on 11/25/26 . To date, R1's representaives were not reimbursed for the balance for fees paid for Nov. 2024. Therefore R1's representative is owed a refund As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - Report reviewed with Natalia . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 18, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260212093422

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility was not kept free of pests Staff did not treat residents with respect Facility was not kept free of mold Staff is not able to communicate with residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/8/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with xxx xxx. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. During inspections no pests were observed and Administrator denied that there has ever been a pest problem. Residents interviewed stated they had not recalled having been spoken to harshly. Mold was not observed by LPA to be present on surfaces. During past and recent inspections, LPA observed staff to have adequate language proficiency to communicate with residents. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview with administrator. UnCDSS inspection report, July 8, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250515100934
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to contact resident's conservator that resident was taken to the hospital.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 7/8/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Natalia Tuleninova, Administrator, to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. Documents and conservator's office statement showed that Admin failed to notify the conservator's office as required for R1's hospitalization. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed with Admin . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 8, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250519143314

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff yells at resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 5/9/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Administrator. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. It was alleged that staff were hear to yell and swear at R1 in two different occasions while R1 was outside on the facility property with staff. R1’s records indicate that R1 is wheelchair dependent and has memory loss due to cognitive decline. When interviewed by LPA, R1 stated on multiple occasions that R1 does not go outside and that staff treat R1 respectfully. R1 stated that R prefers to stay in bed and that staff meet R1’s care needs. Interviews with staff also found that R1 rarely wishes to leave R1’s room despite staff encouragement to do so. Staff interviewed stated that they had not witnessed R1 being mistreated. Interviews with other residents of the home found they hadCDSS inspection report, May 9, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240326134435

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 11 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
11
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(279) 900-8903
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sapphire Senior Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.