Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lincoln, Placer County, California — state license #315920036, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated July 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Lincoln, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #315920036, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
531 Aspen Meadows Way · Lincoln, Placer County
Phone
(916) 409-5620
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, OF WHICH ONE(1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #3 OR BEDROOM #6. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (6).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 19 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the March 26, 2026 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 21, 2025 to March 26, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (9), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 17 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is providing an unknown substance to resident. Staff does not ensure facility is free of mold.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 03/26/2026 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 07/28/2025. LPA met with Caregiver, Daniel Galang, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026 · control 59-AS-20250728085620
20257 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that the facility phone is operable. Staff did not ensure that food supply is sufficient

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks and Investigator Vincent Moleski arrived on Tuesday December 30, 2025, to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA and Investigator observed the contents of the refrigerator to include fresh fruit and vegetables, fruit cups, and yogurt. The freezer contained a variety of foods to include hash browns, orange chicken, chicken patties, tilapia, salmon, and frozen mango. Next to the kitchen cupboards were bins that included avocado, oranges, honey dew, sweet potato, and onions. LPA Parks learned that on December 8, staff smelled smoke in the living room. Staff then discovered that, at some point, water was poured on the router. Since this discovery, the phone has not worked as it relies on a internet connection. LPA confirmed with Administrator Yas that all staff have smart phones. Residents are able to utilize staff phones if needed while the internet is being repaired. Two residents have their own smart phones. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251223160807
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure the heater was not in disrepair Staff are not providing a comfortable temperature for residents

LPA Parks arrived on Tuesday December 2, 2025, to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA learned the following: LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff regarding the heat at the facility. LPA observed the thermostat to be set at 72 degrees. LPA observed the current temperature at 66 degrees. LPA learned that the HVAC was serviced for routine maintenance on October 24, 2025. However, the HVAC technician needed access to the roof which is in the master bedroom. R1 refused to allow the technician to enter their room. Per staff, there have been no complaints about the temperature from residents. Based on information obtained, LPA Finds the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251124102832
Oct 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff retaliated against resident. Staff were unable to effectively communicate with resident due to a language barrier. Staff did not adequately address resident’s inappropriate behaviors. Staff did not assist residents with personal hygiene needs in a timely manner. Staff spoke to resident in an inappropriate manner. Staff withheld resident's mail. Staff illegally evicted a resident in care.

LPA Parks arrived on Wednesday October 22, 2025, to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA learned the following: Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R4, staff, private caregiver and the Administrator. Allegation: Staff retaliated against resident. LPA interviewed the Administrator who stated that staff have never retaliated against a resident. LPA could not find any evidence that the staff have retaliated against R1. Allegation: Staff were unable to effectively communicate with resident due to a language barrier. Residents interviewed stated that they do not have any issues in communicating with staff. LPA has also interviewed staff at the facility and did not experience any issues. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251020124158
Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure food served to residents is of good quality Staff do not ensure food is stored properly at the correct temperatures Staff do not ensure food sanitation practices are followed Staff do not prevent residents’ personal food items from being taken by other persons in the facility Staff does not ensure residents is spoken to in an appropriate manner Staff does not ensure medications are properly managed Staff do not ensure the facility is kept free of pests

LPA Parks arrived on Friday October 3, 2025, to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R3, staff, and the Administrator. LPA reviewed the following documents: pest control contract and invoices, and R1's paperwork including admission agreement and care plan. LPA reviewed the facility’s current supply of perishable and nonperishable foods. LPA observed the refrigerator and freezer’s temperature. Additionally, LPA toured the facility for any signs of pests. LPA learned the following: Allegation: Staff does not ensure food served to residents is of good quality LPA observed and photographed the facility’s perishable and nonperishable food. LPA observed the refrigerator to be filled with fresh produce, fruit, and food. The freezer contained a variety of frozen foods. There was fresh fruit on the counter. Additionally, LPA learned that the facility shops for its foodthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250905083356
Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide resident with respect of his personal privacy and property Staff retaliated against resident for filing complaints on the facility.

LPA Parks arrived on Friday October 3, 2025, to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R3, staff, and the Administrator. LPA learned the following: Allegation: Staff do not provide resident with respect of his personal privacy and property LPA interviewed staff who stated that they only went into R1’s room when it was time for weekly cleaning. Once R1 became upset, they stopped going into R1’s room. R1 does not receive any assistance with ADLs, therefore staff do not go into their room. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250821153043
Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff yell at resident.

LPA Parks arrived on Friday October 3, 2025, to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R3, staff, and the Administrator. LPA learned the following: Allegation: Staff yell at resident. LPA interviewed R2 and R3 who had not experienced nor witnessed staff yelling at residents. LPA interviewed S1 – S4. No staff acknowledged yelling nor witnessing staff yelling at residents. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250812085722
Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: staff are spitting in residents coffee facility forced resident to move rooms

LPA Parks arrived on Friday October 3, 2025, to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA learned the following: Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R2, staff, and the Administrator. Allegation: Staff are spitting in residents coffee Staff denied spitting in coffee for the residents. R2 denied having any concerns that staff were spitting in their coffee. Allegation: facility forced resident to move rooms LPA interviewed staff who stated that R1 has resided in the master bedroom alone, since they moved in. Residents and staff interviewed stated that they were never asked to move rooms for R1 nor were they aware that R1 was asked to move rooms. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251001090519
Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not accord resident dignity in their personal interactions Licensee did not ensure staff were appropriately trained to provide care to residents

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Yasser Patawaran to deliver findings for the above complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250729110912
Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with care needs in a timely manner. Staff recorded resident without consent.

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Yasser Patawaran to deliver findings for the above complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250801122227
Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff not providing adequate food service to resident.

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Yasser Patawaran to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250804093858
Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints0typical 0
Total complaints11typical 0
State visits on file19typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202571202024330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 409-5620

Is Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns licensed?

Yes — Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lincoln (Placer County): California license #315920036, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, OF WHICH ONE(1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #3 OR BEDROOM #6. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (6).

How much does Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on March 26, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 19 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2024 for Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 26, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is providing an unknown substance to resident. Staff does not ensure facility is free of mold.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 03/26/2026 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 07/28/2025. LPA met with Caregiver, Daniel Galang, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2026 · control 59-AS-20250728085620

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that the facility phone is operable. Staff did not ensure that food supply is sufficient
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks and Investigator Vincent Moleski arrived on Tuesday December 30, 2025, to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA and Investigator observed the contents of the refrigerator to include fresh fruit and vegetables, fruit cups, and yogurt. The freezer contained a variety of foods to include hash browns, orange chicken, chicken patties, tilapia, salmon, and frozen mango. Next to the kitchen cupboards were bins that included avocado, oranges, honey dew, sweet potato, and onions. LPA Parks learned that on December 8, staff smelled smoke in the living room. Staff then discovered that, at some point, water was poured on the router. Since this discovery, the phone has not worked as it relies on a internet connection. LPA confirmed with Administrator Yas that all staff have smart phones. Residents are able to utilize staff phones if needed while the internet is being repaired. Two residents have their own smart phones. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, December 30, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251223160807
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure the heater was not in disrepair Staff are not providing a comfortable temperature for residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Parks arrived on Tuesday December 2, 2025, to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA learned the following: LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff regarding the heat at the facility. LPA observed the thermostat to be set at 72 degrees. LPA observed the current temperature at 66 degrees. LPA learned that the HVAC was serviced for routine maintenance on October 24, 2025. However, the HVAC technician needed access to the roof which is in the master bedroom. R1 refused to allow the technician to enter their room. Per staff, there have been no complaints about the temperature from residents. Based on information obtained, LPA Finds the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251124102832
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff retaliated against resident. Staff were unable to effectively communicate with resident due to a language barrier. Staff did not adequately address resident’s inappropriate behaviors. Staff did not assist residents with personal hygiene needs in a timely manner. Staff spoke to resident in an inappropriate manner. Staff withheld resident's mail. Staff illegally evicted a resident in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Parks arrived on Wednesday October 22, 2025, to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA learned the following: Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R4, staff, private caregiver and the Administrator. Allegation: Staff retaliated against resident. LPA interviewed the Administrator who stated that staff have never retaliated against a resident. LPA could not find any evidence that the staff have retaliated against R1. Allegation: Staff were unable to effectively communicate with resident due to a language barrier. Residents interviewed stated that they do not have any issues in communicating with staff. LPA has also interviewed staff at the facility and did not experience any issues. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 22, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251020124158
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure food served to residents is of good quality Staff do not ensure food is stored properly at the correct temperatures Staff do not ensure food sanitation practices are followed Staff do not prevent residents’ personal food items from being taken by other persons in the facility Staff does not ensure residents is spoken to in an appropriate manner Staff does not ensure medications are properly managed Staff do not ensure the facility is kept free of pests
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Parks arrived on Friday October 3, 2025, to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R3, staff, and the Administrator. LPA reviewed the following documents: pest control contract and invoices, and R1's paperwork including admission agreement and care plan. LPA reviewed the facility’s current supply of perishable and nonperishable foods. LPA observed the refrigerator and freezer’s temperature. Additionally, LPA toured the facility for any signs of pests. LPA learned the following: Allegation: Staff does not ensure food served to residents is of good quality LPA observed and photographed the facility’s perishable and nonperishable food. LPA observed the refrigerator to be filled with fresh produce, fruit, and food. The freezer contained a variety of frozen foods. There was fresh fruit on the counter. Additionally, LPA learned that the facility shops for its foodCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250905083356
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide resident with respect of his personal privacy and property Staff retaliated against resident for filing complaints on the facility.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Parks arrived on Friday October 3, 2025, to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R3, staff, and the Administrator. LPA learned the following: Allegation: Staff do not provide resident with respect of his personal privacy and property LPA interviewed staff who stated that they only went into R1’s room when it was time for weekly cleaning. Once R1 became upset, they stopped going into R1’s room. R1 does not receive any assistance with ADLs, therefore staff do not go into their room. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250821153043
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff yell at resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Parks arrived on Friday October 3, 2025, to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R3, staff, and the Administrator. LPA learned the following: Allegation: Staff yell at resident. LPA interviewed R2 and R3 who had not experienced nor witnessed staff yelling at residents. LPA interviewed S1 – S4. No staff acknowledged yelling nor witnessing staff yelling at residents. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250812085722
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedstaff are spitting in residents coffee facility forced resident to move rooms
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Parks arrived on Friday October 3, 2025, to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA learned the following: Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, R1-R2, staff, and the Administrator. Allegation: Staff are spitting in residents coffee Staff denied spitting in coffee for the residents. R2 denied having any concerns that staff were spitting in their coffee. Allegation: facility forced resident to move rooms LPA interviewed staff who stated that R1 has resided in the master bedroom alone, since they moved in. Residents and staff interviewed stated that they were never asked to move rooms for R1 nor were they aware that R1 was asked to move rooms. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251001090519
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not accord resident dignity in their personal interactions Licensee did not ensure staff were appropriately trained to provide care to residents
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Yasser Patawaran to deliver findings for the above complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 27, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250729110912
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with care needs in a timely manner. Staff recorded resident without consent.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Yasser Patawaran to deliver findings for the above complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 27, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250801122227
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not providing adequate food service to resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Yasser Patawaran to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 21, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250804093858

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 19 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
19
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 409-5620
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Aspen Meadows Care Home By Rns? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.