Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Angels Sunrise Villa

Small home·Licensed for 6·Lincoln, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #315920122
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedDecember 23, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 24, 2026CDSS inspection record

Angels Sunrise Villa is a small care home in Lincoln — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2024.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Angels Sunrise Villa

Is Angels Sunrise Villa licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Angels Sunrise Villa licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Angels Sunrise Villa been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Angels Sunrise Villa still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Angels Sunrise Villa cost?

$5,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,150–$6,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Placer County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,900 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Angels Sunrise Villa take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Angels Sunrise Villa Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Angels Sunrise Villa keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Angels Sunrise Villa license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANGELS SUNRISE VILLA INC.”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #315920122. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Angels Sunrise Villa Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH ONE MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (6)

935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,050a month to start

Likely $4,150–$6,200

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,050a month

Likely $4,150–$6,350

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,050likely $4,150–$6,200

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,150–$6,350
$5,050
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,850–$9,450
$7,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

13 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,700.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2060 Donovan Drive, Lincoln, CA 95648Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2024. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 24, 2026.

On file since
2024
State visits
12
Most recent visit
July 24, 2026
Occupied · December 23, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 14, 2025 to December 23, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020253412024440

The last 36 months — 10 of 10 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Friday July 24, 2026, to conduct the unannounced annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed resident (6) and staff (2) files. All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork and training. LPA and Administrator Alpesh toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The following areas were inspected: resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, laundry room, garage and backyard. Facility was clean and well organized. Facility was current on fire drills. Facility had a fully stocked first aid kit. All required postings were observed. All chemicals and knives were kept locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA obtained a copy of the of current liability insurance. Exit interview conducted. No deficiencies cited. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026
Mar 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Thursday March 12, 2026 to conduct a case management visit regarding an incident that was reported to the Department on 2/24/2026. LPA met with staff Parsila and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed R1 regarding the incident. Additionally, LPA reviewed R1's facility file. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2026
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff fail to manage residents’ incontinence Facility staff fail to provide nutritious meals at reasonable mealtimes Staff not provided sleeping accommodations Resident bedding not maintained as clean and in good condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Tuesday December 23, 2025, to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Alpesh and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA toured the facility and inspected resident beds. LPA learned the following: meal times are as following: breakfast at 6am, lunch at 12pm, and dinner between 5pm and 6pm. Per staff, if a resident does not want to eat a meal at the described time, it will be saved and offered to them at a later time. LPA inspected the fridge and pantry and saw a variety of perishable and nonperishable foods, including fruit, meat, and vegetables. Per the Administrator and staff, there is awake staff on the NOC shift. There is no bed or staff quarters provided. All staff interviewed stated that NOC shift staff are awake. LPA interviewed staff who stated that residents are changed every 2 hours and/or as needed. LPA observed all resident beds to have appropriate bedding. Bedding appeared clean and did not have an odor. There was additional bedding stored at the facility to be used, if needed. Unsubstantiated Based on information obtained during the investigation, LPA finds the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- a finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251121132658
Oct 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is storing expired food in the facility

Observations of the kitchen and food storage areas indicated that facility had expired foods that were being served to the residents in care. On 07/22/2025 LPA observed expired milk in the fridge and expired canned goods in the pantry. Interviews conducted with S1 and S2 indicated that there was expired food available for resident consumption. Staff stated that administrator had gone through all the food in the fridge and cabinets to remove all expired foods. Therefore, the allegation that staff are serving expired food to residents in care is substantiated. Based on observation and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standards has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Appeal rights provided. Exit interview conducted. Substantiated Allegation: Personal Rights During the investigation LPA reviewed R1’s 602 which indicated the resident is experiencing sundowning symptoms including confusion and disorientation. On 10/02/2025 LPA interviewed R1 in their bedroom. R1 stated that they had been yelled at in the facility, but could not remember who yelled at them. R1 also stated that they had been pushed in the facility, but could not remember who pushed them. LPA also interviewed R2, who stated they have not heard any yelling or seen another resident being pushed. R2 stated that staff does not yell or gets physical with the residents. S1 denied this allegation and reported that residents are treated with dignity and respect. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Allegation: Facility is not posting an accurate staffing schedule During the investigation interviews with S1 were conducted. S1 provided the LIC500, which accurately showed who was working and at what time. LIC500 showed that at least (1) staff has a first aide certificate at all times. LIC500 showed there are at least (2) staff during the day. S1 stated that if a staff member calls out S1 fills in for the day. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250721130754

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 15, 2025

87555 General Food Service Requirements (a) The total daily diet shall be of the quality...necessary to meet the needs of the residents and shall meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council. All food shall be selected, stored, prepared and served in a safe and healthful manner. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. This was not met as evidenced by: Observation of multiple expired food items in kitchen and pantry shed that was being served to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee will conduct an audit of all food that is available to clients in care to ensure food is not expired. Licensee will send a statement of understanding regarding regulation to LPA by POC due date.

Oct 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensed Program Analysts (LPAs) Graham Gunby and Bethany Mirlohi arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator, Alpesh Kumar, to conduct a case management visit. On 10/02/2025 LPA Gunby visited the facility to investigate a complaint, during this time the following deficiencies were observed: Administrator Qualification: Current administrator certificate is outdated Incomplete Resident Records: LPA observed incomplete required records Violation of Personal Accommodations and Services: While interviewing a resident, staff used their personal bathroom for other residents Deficiencies cited on LIC809-D. Appeal Rights provided. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 28, 2025

87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties (a) All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care. This requirement is not met by: Administrator not having an updated and valid Administrator Certificatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator will complete certificate classes and submit proof of training. In addition, Administrator will submit a receipt of documents sent to Administrators Certificate Bureau. Administrator will submit proof to CCLD by 10/28/2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87506(a)(c) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 21, 2025

87506 Resident Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care. The requirement is not met by: Based on record review of several resident records that were incomplete and unsigned.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2025

Plan of correction: LPA observed an incomplete admission agreement. Administrator will submit the full filled out admission agreement by 10/21/2025 to CCLD by fax or email.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(c) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 21, 2025

87307 Personal Accommodations and Services (a) Living accommodations and grounds shall .... The facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy for the residents:(C)No bedroom of a resident shall be used as a passageway to another room, bath or toilet. This requirement is not met by: Based on observations of staff using a private residents bathroom, for all residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator is to review Regulation 87307 and provide the Department with a signed statement that it is understood. Statement is to be submitted to CCLD by 10/21/2025 via fax or email.

Jul 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/25/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a required 1-year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Alpesh Kumar, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of the facility. Areas toured included but not limited to: resident rooms, bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, common areas, and back yard. LPA observed medications, cleaners, and sharps to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The residence was found to be clean, safe, sanitary and in good condition. LPA observed the facility to have the mandated posters posted. Fire extinguishers are maintained and ready for emergency use. Facility has required food supplies. There are appropriate staff present to meet the needs of residents. LPA conducted a file review of five (5) resident files and three (3) staff files. Resident and staff files had all the required documents present in files. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2025
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Graham Gunby and Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived unannounced to conduct a post-licensing inspection. LPAs met with administrator, Alpesh Kumar, who arrived at 11:30am. LPAs and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior of the facility and inspected the physical plant, kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, laundry area, and backyard area. LPA observed the facility to be clean and in good repair. There is a pool on the property that is locked and inaccessible to the residents. There is sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed required 7 day non-perishable and 2 day perishable food. LPA observed locked medications, knives and toxins to be inaccessible to residents. LPA observed four (4) resident files and three (3) staff files to be organized and complete. LPA requested the liability insurance. LPA observed all required documents to be posted in entry. Exit interview conducted. No deficiencies cited at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024
Oct 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Licensee Initiated

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Tuesday October 1, 2024 to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator Alpesh. This visit is to confirm the change of facility layout and fire clearance. On Monday September 30, 2024, the facility was approved to have 4 private nonambulatory rooms and one shared room, of which bedroom #4 is approved for bedridden. LPA verified that the updated facility sketch is posted at the facility. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024
Jul 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Thursday July 25, 2024 to conduct an announced prelicensing visit. The Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used during today's inspection. This facility has a fire clearance for 5 nonambulatory and one bedridden. Facility has all required postings in the main entryway. LPA toured the facility with Administrator Alepsh. The following areas were inspected for compliance: kitchen, backyard, resident rooms, resident bathrooms, common areas, and garage. Facility has a current fire extinguisher and a full first aid kit. Medications will be kept locked in the laundry room. Cleaning chemicals and knives/sharps will be kept locked and inaccessible to residents. Component III has been waived. The facility appears to be in substantial compliance and ready for licensure. The license will be granted upon completion of a final review and approval from the Licensing Program Manager and the Central Applications Bureau. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report will be left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024
Jul 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): zero COMP II Participants: Alpesh Kumar Interview Method: Telephone interview On July 15, 2024, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, advertising 2. Pool usage, activities, medication storage 3. General provisions/ prelicensing inspection readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Placer County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Placer County