Village Lane Residence is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Auburn, Placer County, California — state license #310311880, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 5, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 10, 2025 to October 9, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Feb 5, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 9, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not follow reporting requirements Staff did not safeguard resident's P & I funds
On October 9, 2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ivan Avila and Cassandra Milkenson conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with licensee Tito Andrada and Administrator Tito Andrada, Jr. and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation process, interviews and a review of records were initiated. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff do not follow reporting requirements.” Based on documentation provided, it was noted that R1 sustained several falls that were not reported as required. Facility records reviewed by LPA did not include corresponding incident reports for these falls, leaving no documented incident reports submitted to the Department. The following allegation cited above is substantiated, but no deficiency will be issued as LPA substantiated the similar allegation for Complaint #59-AS-20250425140320 on October 9, 2025. ------Continued on LIC9099C------ Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250425103010
Oct 9, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to report unexplained injuries and bruising Facility staff did not provide timely medical care Facility staff did not allow resident return following hospital discharge
On October 9, 2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ivan Avila and Cassandra Mikkelson conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with licensee Tito Andrada and Administrator Tito Andrada, Jr. and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation process, interviews and a review of records were initiated. LPA investigated the allegation, “Facility staff failed to report unexplained injuries and bruising.” Based on documentation provided, it was noted that R1 sustained several falls that were not reported as required. The administrator and licensee gave conflicting and inaccurate accounts of an incident that occurred on April 19, 2025. R1 suffered two falls that same day but only one was reported. Facility records reviewed by LPA did not include corresponding incident reports for these falls, leaving no documented trail of injuries or facility actions taken. ------Continued on LIC9099C----the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250425140320
Jul 10, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction
On 7/10/2025 LPA visited the facility unannounced to open the complaint. LPA met with licensee Tito Andrada and Tito Andrada, Jr. LPA and staff discussed the situation. Resident R1 had lived in the facility for many years. Recently R1 suffered a medical emergency and was sent to the ER. Subsequently, it was decided the resident would need to be on hospice services. Since the facility does not have a hospice waiver, the Responsible Party for R1 was told R1 could not return to the facility on hospice, and the home cannot care for R1. The home does not wish to pursue requesting a hospice waiver at this time. CCL cannot force a facility to request a hospice waiver, especially if the facility does not feel this is a service that they could adequately provide for the safety and well-being of a resident. However, since R1 was deemed ready for discharge from the hospital, and the facility did say they could not take R1 back, a proper eviction notice was technically not given. Therefore, the althe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250703083836
Feb 13, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 24, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 2, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 28, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Village Lane Residence licensed?
Yes — Village Lane Residence is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Auburn (Placer County): California license #310311880, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 5, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Village Lane Residence care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Village Lane Residence with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record6 NON-AMBULATORY, AGES 60 AND OVER
How much does Village Lane Residence cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Village Lane Residence's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Village Lane Residence accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Village Lane Residence is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on October 9, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Village Lane Residence?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2021 for Village Lane Residence; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 9, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(530) 823-6335Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Village Lane Residence? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.