Sea Bluffs, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Dana Point, Orange County, California — state license #306006345, licensed for 88 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 12 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated June 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Sea Bluffs, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 88 residents · Dana Point, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006345, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
25421 And 25401 Sea Bluffs Dr · Dana Point, Orange County
Phone
(949) 234-3000
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 88 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 88 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED (BLDG 1) 317 AND 318. BLDG 2; 123, 124, 125, 126, 139, 140, 141, AND 142.DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED AT ADDRESS (25401). WAIVER/ GRANTED HOSPICE FOR (15).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 12 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 24, 2026
Occupancy at the December 19, 2025 visit
73 of 88 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 24, 2024 to December 19, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 12 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff allows the POA to dictate visitors for the residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff, resident and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as staff memo. Regarding the allegation that staff allows the POA to dictate visitors for the residents, the investigation revealed the following: On or around December 9, 2025, visitors attempted to visit Residents 1 and 2 (R1, R2) but were told to arrange the visitation through the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and denied visitation. Two out of two staff, witness and visitor confirm visitation was to be allowed with DPOA approval only. Long Term Care Ombudsman visited the facility and advised visitation was to be allowed if residents were amenable to visiting. LPA interviewed resithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251212092124
Dec 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately touched resident Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff made inappropriate comments towards resident

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to begin the investigation into the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit upon entry. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, a witness, and document review. Regarding the complaint allegation: Staff inappropriately touched resident During interviews 8 of 9 individuals denied the allegation. During an interview with resident 1 (R1), the resident said, I love it here! All the caregivers are very nice. Two additional residents were interviewed and neither resident had any complaints about the caregivers. Resident 2 (R2) says, the caregivers are okay and they come to assist R2 when needed. When the interview was over, R2 said, everyone here is very nice, including you. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250313145658
Jan 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff accepted money from a resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to deliver findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. Based on the information obtained during this investigation the department has concluded the investigation into the above mentioned allegation. Findings are based upon this investigation which included interviews conducted, tour of the physical plant of the facility and copies of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged that staff accepted money from a resident. Interview with staff 1 (S1) indicated that resident 1 (R1) had given them a monitory gift of $1000 dollars. S1 stated that they took the gift, but that they had not spent any of it. S1 indicated that they spoke with R1’s POA about the gift and POA gave S1 indications to hold the money until they came to visit R1 the following month. Interview with 3 of 3 staff indicated that it is company policy that no staff member is allowed to take any monetary gifts from any of the rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250122145257
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is falsifying resident records

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility form. Regarding the allegation that facility is falsifying resident records, the investigation revealed the following: Staff 1 (S1) was employed at the facility as the Memory Care Director. Facility form letter to physicians indicate S1 is an LVN. Review of California State Vocational Nursing Board does not have verification of licensure. S1 denies having an LVN license and indicates the form letter verbiage is an oversight. LPA conducted interviews with S2 and S3 and both deny any falsifying of resident physician reports. Document obtained by LPA indicate a conversation took place educating who can apporpiatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240918145738
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file12typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202558220242212023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $5,000–$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 234-3000

Is Sea Bluffs, The licensed?

Yes — Sea Bluffs, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Dana Point (Orange County): California license #306006345, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 88 residents. State records list 12 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Sea Bluffs, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sea Bluffs, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 88 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED (BLDG 1) 317 AND 318. BLDG 2; 123, 124, 125, 126, 139, 140, 141, AND 142.DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED AT ADDRESS (25401). WAIVER/ GRANTED HOSPICE FOR (15).

How much does Sea Bluffs, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sea Bluffs, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sea Bluffs, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Sea Bluffs, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

73 of 88 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on December 19, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sea Bluffs, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 12 dated documents since 2023 for Sea Bluffs, The; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 19, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff allows the POA to dictate visitors for the residents
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff, resident and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as staff memo. Regarding the allegation that staff allows the POA to dictate visitors for the residents, the investigation revealed the following: On or around December 9, 2025, visitors attempted to visit Residents 1 and 2 (R1, R2) but were told to arrange the visitation through the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and denied visitation. Two out of two staff, witness and visitor confirm visitation was to be allowed with DPOA approval only. Long Term Care Ombudsman visited the facility and advised visitation was to be allowed if residents were amenable to visiting. LPA interviewed resi— CDSS inspection report, December 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251212092124
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff inappropriately touched resident Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff made inappropriate comments towards resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to begin the investigation into the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit upon entry. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, a witness, and document review. Regarding the complaint allegation: Staff inappropriately touched resident During interviews 8 of 9 individuals denied the allegation. During an interview with resident 1 (R1), the resident said, I love it here! All the caregivers are very nice. Two additional residents were interviewed and neither resident had any complaints about the caregivers. Resident 2 (R2) says, the caregivers are okay and they come to assist R2 when needed. When the interview was over, R2 said, everyone here is very nice, including you. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, March 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250313145658
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff accepted money from a resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to deliver findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. Based on the information obtained during this investigation the department has concluded the investigation into the above mentioned allegation. Findings are based upon this investigation which included interviews conducted, tour of the physical plant of the facility and copies of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged that staff accepted money from a resident. Interview with staff 1 (S1) indicated that resident 1 (R1) had given them a monitory gift of $1000 dollars. S1 stated that they took the gift, but that they had not spent any of it. S1 indicated that they spoke with R1’s POA about the gift and POA gave S1 indications to hold the money until they came to visit R1 the following month. Interview with 3 of 3 staff indicated that it is company policy that no staff member is allowed to take any monetary gifts from any of the r— CDSS inspection report, January 27, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250122145257

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is falsifying resident records
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility form. Regarding the allegation that facility is falsifying resident records, the investigation revealed the following: Staff 1 (S1) was employed at the facility as the Memory Care Director. Facility form letter to physicians indicate S1 is an LVN. Review of California State Vocational Nursing Board does not have verification of licensure. S1 denies having an LVN license and indicates the form letter verbiage is an oversight. LPA conducted interviews with S2 and S3 and both deny any falsifying of resident physician reports. Document obtained by LPA indicate a conversation took place educating who can apporpiat— CDSS inspection report, September 24, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240918145738

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Sea Bluffs, The?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Well Oak Tenant Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, who operates 6 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 234-3000
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sea Bluffs, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.