Rochelle Manor is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Garden Grove, Orange County, California — state license #306001093, licensed for 20 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 11, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

8 homes in view

Rochelle Manor

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 20 residents · Garden Grove, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306001093, held since 2000 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
12841 Adelle St · Garden Grove, Orange County
Phone
(714) 537-3188
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 20 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
20 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 11, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 11, 2026
Occupancy at the October 9, 2025 visit
10 of 20 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 2, 2023 to May 11, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
May 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not call 911 for resident screaming in pain.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA called reporting party (RP) and conducted an interview. LPA also attempted to contact the formor LPA to obtain any documents that had been requested. The facility no longer had documents because it was past the three (3) year requirment. The RP could not recall the insdent with any detail. Based on the information gathered during the investigation the department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation the facility did not call 911 for resident screaming in pain this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. A copy of this report will be sent to the facility Via mail. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20210326161202
May 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to provide medical attention

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted called reporting party (RP) and conducted an interview with LPA also attempted to contact the formor LPA to obtain any documents that had been requested. The facility no longer had documents because it was past the three (3) year requirment. The RP could not recall the insdent with any detail. Based on the information gathered during the investigation the department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation the facility failed to provide medical attention this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. A copy of this report will be sent to the facility Via mail. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20210521163331
Mar 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not meet resident's needs. Facility did not maintain accurate facility records for resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on August 19, 2022. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Foster Ringor. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that facility did not meet resident's needs. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews Resident 1 (R1) reported that the facility assists him when making appointments for his medical needs and stated that he would rate the facility 9 out of 10. Per R2, he is setting up his own medical appointments and picking up his own medications from the pharmacy. R4 stated that staff are pretty good and reported that the staff are meeting his needs. Per R4, staff give him what he needs. During the course of the interviews AD reported that he had been following up with the podiatrist for R6; however, he wasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220819152809
Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Facility has bed bugs

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry into the facility by a caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Foster Ringor arrived later to assist with the visit. The department received a complaint on March 5, 2025, and LPA Tea conducted the initial 10-day visit a week later on March 12, 2025. It was alleged that facility has bed bugs. LPA Tea interviewed facility staff and collected pertinent documents such as staff and resident rosters, copies of Resident 1’s (R1) physician’s report, R1’s Body Check Report, furniture purchase receipts and pest control maintenance paperwork. The investigation determined the following: The department received notice about Resident 1 (R1) residing at Rochelle Manor had bed bugs on their sleigh and wheelchair at the day program they attend. The photos obtained show dead bed bugs on R1’s items and photos of dirt anthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250305141140
Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 23, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file13typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2000.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026230202523120233312022440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 537-3188

Is Rochelle Manor licensed?

Yes — Rochelle Manor is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Garden Grove (Orange County): California license #306001093, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 20 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 11, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Rochelle Manor care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Rochelle Manor with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record20 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2

How much does Rochelle Manor cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Rochelle Manor's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Rochelle Manor accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Rochelle Manor is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

10 of 20 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on October 9, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Rochelle Manor?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2022 for Rochelle Manor; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 11, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not call 911 for resident screaming in pain.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA called reporting party (RP) and conducted an interview. LPA also attempted to contact the formor LPA to obtain any documents that had been requested. The facility no longer had documents because it was past the three (3) year requirment. The RP could not recall the insdent with any detail. Based on the information gathered during the investigation the department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation the facility did not call 911 for resident screaming in pain this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. A copy of this report will be sent to the facility Via mail. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20210326161202
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to provide medical attention
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted called reporting party (RP) and conducted an interview with LPA also attempted to contact the formor LPA to obtain any documents that had been requested. The facility no longer had documents because it was past the three (3) year requirment. The RP could not recall the insdent with any detail. Based on the information gathered during the investigation the department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation the facility failed to provide medical attention this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. A copy of this report will be sent to the facility Via mail. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20210521163331

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not meet resident's needs. Facility did not maintain accurate facility records for resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on August 19, 2022. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Foster Ringor. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that facility did not meet resident's needs. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews Resident 1 (R1) reported that the facility assists him when making appointments for his medical needs and stated that he would rate the facility 9 out of 10. Per R2, he is setting up his own medical appointments and picking up his own medications from the pharmacy. R4 stated that staff are pretty good and reported that the staff are meeting his needs. Per R4, staff give him what he needs. During the course of the interviews AD reported that he had been following up with the podiatrist for R6; however, he wasCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220819152809
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility has bed bugs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry into the facility by a caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Foster Ringor arrived later to assist with the visit. The department received a complaint on March 5, 2025, and LPA Tea conducted the initial 10-day visit a week later on March 12, 2025. It was alleged that facility has bed bugs. LPA Tea interviewed facility staff and collected pertinent documents such as staff and resident rosters, copies of Resident 1’s (R1) physician’s report, R1’s Body Check Report, furniture purchase receipts and pest control maintenance paperwork. The investigation determined the following: The department received notice about Resident 1 (R1) residing at Rochelle Manor had bed bugs on their sleigh and wheelchair at the day program they attend. The photos obtained show dead bed bugs on R1’s items and photos of dirt anCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250305141140

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not prevent resident's pressure injuries from reoccurring while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Cindy Santos and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Foster Ringor was present as well. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report and facility notes. Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not prevent resident's pressure injuries from reoccurring while in care, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) is non-ambulatory and diagnosed with Severe Cerebral Palsy. Facility documentation shows resident has been dealing with chronic pressure injuries since at least 2019. R1's Individual Program Plan (IPP) dated 10/28/2022 outlines resident's history of wounds and the importance of managing the wounds. Since 12/16/2022, R1 wCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230430182419
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not meeting resident's needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patricia Velazquez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings of the investigation into the above allegation. LPA Velazquez was allowed entry into the facility and met with Administrator Foster Ringor. On today's visit LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with staff and looked in on Resident (R) #1 who was lying in their bed resting in their room and watching TV. During the course of the investigation the following was revealed: LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA Velazquez also reviewed and obtained copies of facility, resident, and staff records. The records reviewed included R1's Client Development and Evaluation Report (CDER), Individual Program Plan (IPP), Physician's Report, Special Incident Report for an incident dated February 17, 2023 documenting redness and skin breakdown, Advanced Center for Urology records, Admission Agreement, Resident Appraisal, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Medication ShCDSS inspection report, March 2, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230217133353

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 537-3188
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Rochelle Manor? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.