Mid-size home · Licensed for 20 · Garden Grove
Rochelle Manor
12841 Adelle St, Garden Grove, CA 92841Licensed since 2000
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 20: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 20 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
20 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Rochelle Manor: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,150a month to start
Likely $3,250–$5,450
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,150likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,150likely $3,250–$5,450
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,250–$5,600
- $4,150
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,750
- $6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $5,500
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,650–$4,600.
- Alper's Care HomeGarden Grove · 0.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Loving Home CareWestminster · 1.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mary's Assisted Home LivingGarden Grove · 1.2 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Beverly Residential CareGarden Grove · 1.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Cottages at Artesia AnaheimAnaheim · 2.4 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Caring Hands Senior Home CareWestminster · 2.5 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- JC Home for Seniors-CareHuntington Beach · 2.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Lola Senior Guest HomeStanton · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
12841 Adelle St, Garden Grove, CA 92841Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kindred Hospital WestminsterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #306001093 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 13 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 3 documents
May 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not call 911 for resident screaming in pain.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA called reporting party (RP) and conducted an interview. LPA also attempted to contact the formor LPA to obtain any documents that had been requested. The facility no longer had documents because it was past the three (3) year requirment. The RP could not recall the insdent with any detail. Based on the information gathered during the investigation the department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation the facility did not call 911 for resident screaming in pain this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. A copy of this report will be sent to the facility Via mail. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20210326161202
May 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility failed to provide medical attention
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis made an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted called reporting party (RP) and conducted an interview with LPA also attempted to contact the formor LPA to obtain any documents that had been requested. The facility no longer had documents because it was past the three (3) year requirment. The RP could not recall the insdent with any detail. Based on the information gathered during the investigation the department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation the facility failed to provide medical attention this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. A copy of this report will be sent to the facility Via mail. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20210521163331
Mar 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea conducted an unannounced visit. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the Annual Required inspection. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry into the facility by facility staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator, Foster Ringor arrived shortly after to assist during the visit. Facility is licensed for twenty non-ambulatory residents, with a hospice waiver for two. Currently there are ten residents residing during today's visit and no one on hospice during today's visit.. LPA Tea reviewed five resident files and three staff files. Resident files contained all required documentation. Staff files had some discrepancies with training and health screening. Administrator certificate expires on May 25, 2026. LPA Tea along with Administrator Ringor toured the facility. LPA toured the physical plant, checked food service, and the first aid kit. The facility is a two-story home. The first floor is where the residents reside, the second floor is for staff only. The first floor has ten resident rooms and 4 full bathrooms and a half bathroom for staff. There is a kitchen, living room, dining area, laundry area and attached garage. The second floor has four bedrooms and a bathroom for private use for the staff. LPA observed smoke detectors/carbon monoxide in common areas and bedrooms are operational. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each client comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, and shower was free of mold/mildew. Water temperature measured around 118.4 Fahrenheit degrees. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked at time of visit. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. First aid kit had all the required elements including bandages, dressing, tweezers, thermometer, and scissors. Kitchen was inspected. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at time of visit. LPA observed sharps Continuation of annual report on LIC809C locked in a kitchen drawer. LPA also observed toxin substances to be secured and locked and inaccessible to clients underneath the kitchen sink, cabinets in the laundry room and garage. Fire extinguishers are fully charged throughout the facility. The facility’s last disaster drill was conducted on January 15, 2026. Kitchen appliances are operational during today's visit. LPA toured the outside grounds and there is ample seating with shade. LPA observed emergency supplies, food and water in the garage. At the time of the visit LPA Tea observed residents relaxing in the living room. The staff provides activities to residents based on their preferences, there are puzzles, games for them to do. They play bingo. On weekends the facility takes residents on outings, to the beach, shopping and to go out to eat. LPA reviewed medication storage and administration. Medications are stored in a locked cabinet in the dining area. Medications are being administered per physician order. P&I Funds were checked, there were no discrepancies and they meet department standards. LPA interviewed residents regarding their quality of care and spoke to staff present regarding care provided. The following deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was reviewed with the facility and a copy of this report LIC809, 809-C, LIC858, LIC859, LIC809D. LIC9102TV and Appeal Rights were read and provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2026
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not meet resident's needs. Facility did not maintain accurate facility records for resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on August 19, 2022. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Foster Ringor. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that facility did not meet resident's needs. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews Resident 1 (R1) reported that the facility assists him when making appointments for his medical needs and stated that he would rate the facility 9 out of 10. Per R2, he is setting up his own medical appointments and picking up his own medications from the pharmacy. R4 stated that staff are pretty good and reported that the staff are meeting his needs. Per R4, staff give him what he needs. During the course of the interviews AD reported that he had been following up with the podiatrist for R6; however, he was unreachable. Per AD, facility did try to get referral for a new podiatrist. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C... Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation that facility did not maintain accurate facility records for resident in care, the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews four of six residents interviewed denied the allegation. LPA was not able to qualify and/or interview two of six residents. During the course of the interviews with residents, R1 reported that he had no concerns about his medical records. Per R2, he has no concerns with facility maintaining his records. R4 stated that management keep the resident records in order. During the subsequent visit on September 17, 2025, Licensee did not have records for R6. Per California Code of Regulation, under Resident Records 87506 (a)(e) it states original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident. Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of documents obtained, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported due to conflicting information. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred; therefore, these allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. For today’s visit, there were no citations issued per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. LPA conducted an exit interview with AD Ringor, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220819152809
Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Facility has bed bugs
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry into the facility by a caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Foster Ringor arrived later to assist with the visit. The department received a complaint on March 5, 2025, and LPA Tea conducted the initial 10-day visit a week later on March 12, 2025. It was alleged that facility has bed bugs. LPA Tea interviewed facility staff and collected pertinent documents such as staff and resident rosters, copies of Resident 1’s (R1) physician’s report, R1’s Body Check Report, furniture purchase receipts and pest control maintenance paperwork. The investigation determined the following: The department received notice about Resident 1 (R1) residing at Rochelle Manor had bed bugs on their sleigh and wheelchair at the day program they attend. The photos obtained show dead bed bugs on R1’s items and photos of dirt and debris around the wheelchair and sleigh. LPA Tea emailed the facility and Continued on LIC9099C Substantiated received a follow up email from Administrator Foster Ringor on February 4, 2025 that exterminators were coming to do inspection that day to do a home inspection and treatment to the affected room. AD Ringor followed proper procedure and reported to Orange County Public Health and Orange County Regional Center about the bed bugs. Per records obtained, Hawx Smart Pest Control paperwork shows initial inspection and agreement made for treating bed bugs in the facility. On February 10, 2025, a report from the pest control company showed the exterminators completed the bed bug service treatment for six bedrooms for bed bug activities. When asked about the cleanliness of the wheelchair and sleigh, Administrator Ringor stated that they were not on top of maintaining resident items since the incident they do daily wheelchair checks in the morning. Per interviews conducted, four out four staff confirmed that there were bed bugs at the facility. All staff interviewed said the facility treated and responded to the bed bugs right away and that there are no more bed bugs at the facility. The Body Check Report obtained show R1 having no bites or changes in skin conditions. Facility has purchased brand new replacement mattresses and bedframes for the facility as well. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence through records reviewed and interviews the allegation facility has bed bugs is determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Foster Ringor and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250305141140
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 13, 2025
Maintenance and Operation ... The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Facility had bed bug infestation. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025
Plan of correction: Before complaint investigation was conducted the facility had eradicated the bed bug infestation. They had pest control do initial inspection on 02/04/25 and treatment on 02/10/25. Moved resident to another room, wash and treated clothing and bedding and replaced mattresses.
Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea conducted an unannounced visit. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the Annual Required inspection. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry into the facility by DSP staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator, Foster Ringor arrived shortly after to assist during the visit. Facility is licensed for twenty non-ambulatory residents, with a hospice waiver for two. Currently there are ten residents residing during today's visit. LPA Tea reviewed five resident files and staff files. Resident files contained all required documentation. Staff files had some discrepancies with training. Administrator certificate expires on May 25, 2026. LPA Tea along with Administrator Ringor toured the facility at 10:19 AM. LPA toured the physical plant, checked food service, and the first aid kit. The facility is a two-story home. The first floor is where the residents reside, the second floor is for staff only. The first floor has ten resident rooms and 4 full bathrooms and a half bathroom for staff. There is a kitchen, living room, dining area, laundry area and attached garage. The second floor has four bedrooms and a bathroom for private use for the staff. At the time of the visit the facility is undergoing renovation improvements. The facility has hired contractors to repaint the interior of first floor and kitchen. The floors have been replaced with a nice new vinyl flooring. LPA observed smoke detectors/carbon monoxide in common areas and bedrooms are operational. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each client comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, and shower was free of mold/mildew. Water temperature measured between 121.1 F degrees and 125.2 F degrees. It was a bit high, Administrator Ringor adjusted the water temperature and immediately created and posted “Hot Water” caution signs around the facility sink faucets. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked at time of visit. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. First aid kit had all the required elements including bandages, dressing, tweezers, thermometer, and scissors. Kitchen was inspected. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at time of visit. Continuation of annual report on LIC809C LPA observed sharps locked in a kitchen drawer. LPA also observed toxin substances to be secured and locked and inaccessible to clients underneath the kitchen sink, cabinets in the laundry room and garage. Fire extinguishers are fully charged throughout the facility. The facility’s last fire drill was conducted on March 10, 2025. Kitchen appliances are operational during today's visit. LPA toured the outside grounds and there is ample seating with shade. LPA observed emergency supplies and food in the garage. At the time of the visit the emergency water was being replenished for the week due the water was expired and needed to be replaced. Administrator checks the emergency supply weekly to make sure there are no expired items. At the time of the visit LPA Tea observed residents eating lunch together, and one resident knitting after lunch and a few of them putting puzzles together. The staff provides activities to residents based on their preferences, there are puzzles, games for them to do. They play bingo. From time to time the facility takes residents on outings. At 10:33 AM LPA reviewed medication storage and administration. Medications are stored in a locked cabinet in the dining area. Medications are being administered per physician order. P&I Funds were checked and meet department standards. LPA interviewed residents regarding their quality of care and spoke to staff present regarding care provided. Based on the observation made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were noted today in the areas inspected per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was reviewed with Administrator Foster Ringor and a copy of this report LIC809, 809-C, LIC858, LIC859, and LIC9102TV was read and provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 7 documents
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 23, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez is conducting this unannounced visit for the purpose of completing an annual required inspection. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted and granted entry by Foster Ringor, Administrator and LPA explained the nature of the visit. There are 12 residents at the facility and there are no residents receiving hospice services currently. LPA accompanied by the Administrator began the tour of the inside and outside of the facility. LPA observed residents throughout the facility in common areas and in their bedrooms. LPA observed required department postings throughout the facility. Facility stays within the capacity limitations. There is a minimum of one week of non-perishables foods and two days of perishables foods available. There is additional food storage in the refrigerator/freezer located in garage. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected that medication is centrally stored in a safe locked storage cabinet located in dining room. LPA reviewed medication and observed medication was labeled and stored inaccessible to residents in care. LPA inspected the bathroom and LPA measured the hot water temperature which measured 114.2 Fahrenheit degrees. All bathrooms observed to have a supply of soap, toilet paper and towels. Bathrooms are equipped with required safety measures such as non-skid mats and grab bars. Lighting is sufficient to ensure safety and comfort. The facility is equipped with sufficient hand hygiene, cleaning, and disinfecting supplies. LPA observed that toxic chemicals, cleaning solutions and disinfectants are stored locked underneath kitchen sink and locked storage cabinet in laundry unit. The facility has an available clean supply of linens. LPA inspected residents’ bedrooms which has sufficient lighting to ensure the safety and comfort. All bedrooms observed to have all required components. Storage space is provided for residents in their bedroom. Smoke detectors were tested and found to be operational. LPA observed facility has a sprinkler system as well, which is serviced by the fire authority. LPA observed fire extinguishers throughout the facility with service date of June 07, 2023. Fire drills are conducted twice a year. LPA toured the outside of the facility and Continued on LIC809-C observed outdoor passageways are free of obstructions. LPA observed there are shaded seating areas for residents’ enjoyment. LPA began review of records. LPA reviewed three resident records. All the required documentation was present and current in the residents’ files reviewed. LPA reviewed three employee records. All employees present have a criminal record clearance and are associated to the facility. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were noted today in the areas inspected per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was reviewed with the Administrator and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2023
May 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not prevent resident's pressure injuries from reoccurring while in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Cindy Santos and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Foster Ringor was present as well. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report and facility notes. Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not prevent resident's pressure injuries from reoccurring while in care, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) is non-ambulatory and diagnosed with Severe Cerebral Palsy. Facility documentation shows resident has been dealing with chronic pressure injuries since at least 2019. R1's Individual Program Plan (IPP) dated 10/28/2022 outlines resident's history of wounds and the importance of managing the wounds. Since 12/16/2022, R1 was seen at urgent care or by physician five times (12/16/2022, 01/20/2023, 02/17/2023, 03/14/2023 and 04/28/2023) for dermatitis/ pressure injuries and prescribed topical creams. No other interventions were prescribed and staff requested side support cushion for resident. Administrator states requesting home health for resident CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C DATED 05/15/2023 Unsubstantiated but was denied due to the low staging of wounds. Administrator states wounds are stage 1 but there is no staging in any medical paperwork. Four out of four staff indicate turning resident and applying topical creams. Facility paperwork indicates creams were being applied to resident. LPA observed pillow configuration for R1's wheelchair. Based on multiple interviews conducted and documents reviewed, there is not enough evidence or corroborating information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230430182419
Mar 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is not meeting resident's needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patricia Velazquez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings of the investigation into the above allegation. LPA Velazquez was allowed entry into the facility and met with Administrator Foster Ringor. On today's visit LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with staff and looked in on Resident (R) #1 who was lying in their bed resting in their room and watching TV. During the course of the investigation the following was revealed: LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA Velazquez also reviewed and obtained copies of facility, resident, and staff records. The records reviewed included R1's Client Development and Evaluation Report (CDER), Individual Program Plan (IPP), Physician's Report, Special Incident Report for an incident dated February 17, 2023 documenting redness and skin breakdown, Advanced Center for Urology records, Admission Agreement, Resident Appraisal, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Medication Sheet, Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Substantiated Record, and Rochelle Manor Facility Reports. During the interviews conducted and email communication between Staff (S) #1 and LPA Velazquez, S1 confirmed that R1 was sent to the Day Program without R1's Hoyer Lift Sling on two different occasions. S1 also confirmed facility staff failed to include R1's disposable briefs in R1's backpack on at least one occasion when R1 was sent to their Day Program. Six of seven individuals interviewed provided conflicting statements and could not corroborate the allegation. S1 further stated they are working with the Regional Center Orange County Service Coordinator and Quality Assurance Coordinator to ascertain if R1 requires a higher level of care than what can be provided at this facility. Based on LPA's observations, interviews which were conducted and the records that were reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the following allegation: Facility is not meeting resident's needs is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Foster Ringor and a copy of this report along with the Appeal Rights, LIC 811s, and LIC 9098 were provided at the time of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230217133353
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 3, 2023
Basic Services. Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: based on resident record review & interviews conducted the licensee failed to provide R1's sling and briefs as needed. This poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to ensure all residents' needs are met at all times. Licensee to conduct an in-service staff training regarding this regulation by 3/4/2023. Licensee to provide the name of the instructor, their qualifications, and submit written proof of the staff training to LPA by POC due date. The licensee to provide LPA a written statement indicating they have read this section of Title 22 regulation and how exactly they intend to adhere to it by POC due date.
20224 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Marin made an unannounced visit to this facility. LPA met with Administrator Foster (AD) Ringor and stated the purpose of this visit. On June 22, 2022, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Orange Office received an incident report from this facility indicating that Resident 1 (R1) was observed to have a lump over the right eye. R1 was sent out for medical consult and came back to the facility on the same day. For this visit, LPA Marin toured the interior and exterior portions of the facility. LPA observed two staff members on the floor with 9 residents in common area and one in the bedroom. 5 residents were out of the facility attending respective day programs. LPA did a file review of R1's visit in the emergency department. LPA discussed with AD California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 87466 : Observation of the Resident. For this visit, no citation was issued. LPA Marin conducted an exit interview with AD Foster Ringor. LPA left copy of this report and CCR 87466 in the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2022
May 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Marin made an unannounced case management visit to this facility. LPA met with Administrator (Ad) Foster Ringor and stated the purpose of this visit. On March 14, 2022, LPA Marin conducted an unannounced case management visit for an incident that occurred in the facility last March 4, 2022. Based on observation, file review and interview, the following are the findings: On March 9, 2022, Facility received a verbal report from Staff 1 alleging Staff 2 did a personal rights violation on Resident 1. Facility investigated the incident and determined to end the employment of Staff 2 for not following the facility procedure. Per interviews, facility did a visual check on Resident 1(R1) and did not notice any concerns related to the incident. Facility informed the responsible party about the alleged incident. Facility made effort to bring resident for a medical evaluation. File review of facility document indicated that the annual staff training log for 2021-2022 lacked training on Resident's Personal Rights. Deficiency was observed; and citation was issued per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. LPA Marin conducted an exit interview with AD F. Ringor. LPA discussed the deficiency, citation, and appeal rights. LPA left copies of this report, deficiency page, and appeal rights in the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(c)(3)(C) · Plan of correction due date: May 31, 2022
87411 Personnel Requirements - General. All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training...Residents rights, as specified in Section 87468, Personal Rights. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based file review and interview, facilty miss to provide training facility staff regarding Personal Rights. Facility failed to document annual training for Staff 1 and Staff 2 regarding resident's personal rights. This poses potential personal rights violation against residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2022
Plan of correction: AD will ensure that the staff will receive the training on personal rights. Proof of correction will be provided to CCLD on or before May 31, 2022. Copy of the reguation cited was left in the facility for full reference.
Apr 6, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Claudia Gutierrez and Andrea Mendivil and Licensing Program Managers (LPMs) Alisa Ortiz and Armando Lucero for the purpose of conducting an Required/Annual Inspection. LPAs and LPMs were greeted by Maria “Tess” Castillo and Administrator (AD) Foster Ringor who arrived shortly after at 3:44pm. LPA Gutierrez discussed the purpose of the inspection. During the inspection LPAs, LPMs and AD conducted a tour of the inside and outside of the facility, common areas, resident rooms, kitchen, and garage and observed the following: This is a two-story house with staff quarters upstairs. LPAs and LPMs observed and toured the staff quarters where two of the four bedrooms were locked; a Technical Advisory was given on this date. Ten resident bedrooms and 5 bathrooms were found to be downstairs. During the inspection, LPAs, LPMs, and AD observed there were 3 staff present. Residents were observed socializing, playing games, and watching a movie in the living room and dining area. LPAs and LPMs inspected common areas, resident rooms, kitchen, and garage and observed a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food is available. LPA observed hallways and walkways were free of obstruction. LPA reviewed and confirmed facility policies and practices regarding resident screening, staff screening, visitation, COVID-19 surveillance testing, COVID-19 clearance testing, quarantine, isolation, cohorting, infection control training, PPE, staffing and staffing shortages. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, no deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, due to technical issues LPA Gutierrez will email AD report first thing in the morning and will also be mailing by certified mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2022
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Mar 14, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Marin made an unannounced case management visit to this facility. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Foster Ringor and stated the purpose of this visit. On March 10, 2022, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Orange Office received an incident report from the facility. The incident stated an allegation on personal rights violation of a resident in the facility. With assistance from AD Ringor, LPA Marin toured the interior and exterior portions of the facility. LPA observed resident's rooms and common areas. LPA conducted random interviews and file review. LPA discussed with AD the requested documents. AD agreed to provide the documents to CCLD on or before 5:00 PM of March 22, 2022. For this visit, no citation was issued. LPA Marin conducted an exit interview with AD F. Ringor. Due to technical issue, LPA Marin will send copy of this report to the email address of the facility on file. AD agreed to acknowledge the receipt of this report and the list of documents request.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2022
10 of 20 beds were occupied at the October 9, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Rochelle Manor, Inc., licensed since 2000.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2000, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 13
- Total complaints
- 6
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2000, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 6 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Rochelle Manor
Is Rochelle Manor licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Rochelle Manor licensed for?
20 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Rochelle Manor been cited?
2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is Rochelle Manor still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Rochelle Manor cost?
$4,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,250–$5,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 194 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 194 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Rochelle Manor take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Rochelle Manor, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kindred Hospital Westminster is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Rochelle Manor keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Rochelle Manor license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ROCHELLE MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #306001093. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 20 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Rochelle Manor, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 6 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 11, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Orange County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$5,063 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,350- Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Orange County