Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Three Home Village 2License #216803746 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareThree Home Village 2License #216803746 · 675 Rosal Way, San Rafael, CA · (415) 492-1215Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Marin County/San Rafael/Three Home Village 2
Map · 675 Rosal Way

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$6,000/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,950–$7,400 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (415) 492-1215

    From the state licensing record · October 25, 2026

  • threehomevillage.com↗

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

TH

Call Three Home Village 2

San Rafael · Licensed for 6

(415) 492-1215

From the state licensing record · October 25, 2026

From the home’s website, threehomevillage.com:

(415) 461-6136 · main line · seen October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Rafael

Three Home Village 2

675 Rosal Way, San Rafael, CA 94903 · Licensed since 2018

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Three Home Village 2

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$6,000 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,950–$7,400 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 25, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 3 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 2 residents

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 25, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 25, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Assisted living

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

  • Works with residents’ own health care providers

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

  • Activities of daily living the home lists help withBathing · Dressing · Other functions adapted to individual needs · Other functions

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated August 12, 2024.

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 25, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 25, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Three Home Village 2: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$6,000a month to start

Likely $4,950–$7,400

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$6,000likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$6,000likely $4,950–$7,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,950–$7,550
$6,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,750–$10,650
$8,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $15,000

$3,500$15,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

9 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,150–$7,600.

  • Haven House of San RafaelSan Rafael · 0.9 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Daniel Rest HomeSan Rafael · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Golden Home Extended CareSan Rafael · 1.8 mi · Mid-size home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Villa Marin Ambulatory Care UnitSan Rafael · 2.0 mi · Mid-size home
    $15,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Shalom HouseSan Rafael · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Bello Gardens Assisted LivingSan Anselmo · 4.0 mi · Mid-size home
    $4,800Listed on Seniorly · memory care private room · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • Bel Marin GardensNovato · 5.0 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Anton PointeNovato · 6.2 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Marin TerraceMill Valley · 8.0 mi · Mid-size home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (2)Room types · Common areas
  • Room typesSingle occupancy private bedrooms

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated August 12, 2024.

  • Common areasShared common areas

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated August 12, 2024.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (4)Meals provided per day · Special diets supported · Snacks available
  • Meals provided per day3

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

  • Special diets supportedIndividual dietary needs and preferences

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

  • Snacks available

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (1)The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes it
  • The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itDaily activity programs encourage and support physical, emotional, and social well-being.

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

Visiting & staying involved (3)Support services for families · Neighborhood or area named · URL of the photo gallery page
  • Support services for families

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

  • Neighborhood or area namedSan Rafael, CA 94903

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 15, 2020.

  • URL of the photo gallery page

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated July 24, 2020.

    Open on the website ↗
About the home (1)Brand or trade name
  • Brand or trade nameThree Home Village

    Reported on threehomevillage.com · source dated August 12, 2024.

Where it is

675 Rosal Way, San Rafael, CA 94903Address from the public record · October 25, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San RafaelHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.2 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 25, 2026 · License #216803746 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unfounded”.

20261 state visit · 1 document

Jan 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer medications as prescribed

At approximately 9:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Licensees, Erik Flatt and Adam Waskow, and Administrator, Matthew Riformo. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegation was investigated, “Staff did not administer medications as prescribed.” Complaint alleged the following: facility staff were documenting that Resident 1’s (R1’s) lubricating eyedrops was given, but were not administering it during the evening, that they ran out of R1’s estradiol cream, and that R1 was given their Fosfomycin Tromethamine medication every 48 hours when the physician order stated that the medication was to be given every 72 hours. Complainant stated that R1 did not receive their eyedrops in September and October 2024, and that R1’s estradiol cream was running low in November 2024. Continued on LIC9099C Substantiated Continued from LIC9099 Review of R1’s medication administration record for Dorzolamide-Timiolol, Latanoprost, and Erythromycin eyedrops in September and October 2024 showed that R1 received their eyedrops. Review of R1’s medication administration record for November and December 2024 indicated that facility had estradiol cream available and administered it appropriately. LPA is unable to review R1’s eyedrops or estradiol cream as it is no longer available. Interview conducted with the licensees stated that the facility was not allowed to communicate with R1's Primary Care Physician or medical professionals at all and that all communication with medical was done through R1’s responsible party. Review of R1’s physician orders for Fosfomycin Tromethamine stated “Take 1 packet by mouth every 72 hours.” Review of R1’s medication administration record showed that R1 received this medication on 10/24/2023, 10/26/2023, and 10/28/2023. Based on record review and observations made, this allegation is Substantiated. A finding that the Complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights, discussed and provided to Executive Director. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents. Continued from LIC9099 Complaint stated that R1 was observed with smoothie remnants on their pillow indicating that facility staff did not ensure that R1’s mouth was clear of food before putting them to bed. Complaint also stated that facility staff were not using thickened water for R1 when brushing their teeth. Review of R1’s Physician’s Report dated 07/28/2024 stated that R1 was to be on a mechanical soft diet that was vegan and low sugar. Interview conducted with Licensees and Administrator stated that the facility did not prepare food for R1 because R1’s family would bring in their meals. Interviews conducted with facility staff and witnesses revealed conflicting statements. 8 of 8 interviews conducted stated that R1’s family prepared and brought in the meals for R1 to eat. Per interviews conducted, these meals consisted of pureed food, soups, smoothies, and thickened water. 5 of 5 staff interviews stated that R1 would be fed by family or by their one-on-one caregiver. 2 of 3 witness interviews stated that R1 was fed by family or by their private caregivers, while 1 of 3 witness interviews stated that facility staff members would help feed R1 when R1’s family was unable to feed R1 themselves. 1 of 3 witness interviews also revealed that the only time they observed facility staff with R1 at mealtime was to give them their medications. 5 of 5 facility staff interviews were able to describe what to do if a resident were to aspirate. Review of R1’s documents showed that on 05/27/2023, R1 had a swallowing evaluation conducted where it was determined that R1 did not have any overt signs or symptoms of aspiration during eating or drinking. Evaluation continued to state that R1’s diet was to continue to be regular, with liquid viscosity to be nectar thick at the family’s preference, while R1 may have thin water between meals. Complaint reported that facility staff were not changing or repositioning R1 enough causing R1’s pressure injury to worsen. Review of facility records showed that R1’s physician sent orders on 06/06/2025 stating “when in bed, please reposition every 1 hour. For night, please reposition every 1-2 hours while in bed.” Review of facility documents showed that on 06/06/2025, facility implemented their repositioning log. Review of R1’s repositioning log for June and July 2025 indicated that R1 was checked at least every 2 hours and documented if R1 was on their left or right side, did a skin check for redness or moisture, and noted any additional concerns such as if R1 was dry or not. Additional documentation also showed that facility had a bowel movement log for R1 in May, June, and July 2025. 8 of 8 interviews conducted stated that R1 would be changed at least two to three times a day or more if needed. Complaint reported that facility staff were not brushing R1’s teeth. Complainant provided photos to Department. Per Complainant, photos provided are of R1’s dry toothbrush which indicated the facility was not brushing R1’s teeth. Interviews conducted with facility staff and witnesses revealed conflicting statements. 5 of 5 staff interviews stated that they brush R1’s teeth twice a day, once in the morning and once in the evening. 1 of 3 witnesses stated that they only saw facility staff brush R1’s teeth in the morning. 1 of 3 witnesses stated that they observed facility staff brush R1’s teeth once or twice in Continued on LIC9099C Continued from LIC9099C the evenings. 1 of 3 witness interviews stated they did not observe R1’s teeth being brushed while they were there as R1 was already awake and ready for the day during visits. Based on conflicting interview statements, record review, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. “Staff do not have proper training” – Complaint alleged that facility staff did not have proper training. Per complaint, facility staff did not know how to properly wipe R1 and did not put on new gloves after doing incontinence care to administer medication. Per complaint, R1 was prone to urinary tract infections and facility staff were not cleaning R1 from front to back. Complaint also stated that facility staff were not changing out their gloves causing R1 to get a bacterial infection in their eye. Review of facility staff files showed that there was training conducted in September 2024 for infection control which reviewed items such as hand hygiene and using gloves as a protective barrier. Facility also conducted wound care training in June 2025 which reviewed symptoms and care needs during incontinence care. Interviews conducted with facility staff and witnesses revealed conflicting responses. 5 of 5 staff interviews stated that when providing incontinence care for R1, they change their gloves. 1 of 3 witness interviews stated that they observed facility staff to properly use and change out their gloves while providing incontinence care. 1 of 3 witness interviews stated that facility staff did not change their gloves after providing incontinence care and that facility staff did not wipe R1 properly. 1 of 3 witness interviews stated that they have observed facility staff to change their gloves but they could not recall if facility staff changed their gloves to administer medication after providing incontinence care. Interviews with Licensees stated that R1 aggressively picked and scratched at their eye and had to wear a glove and an eye patch to help prevent the scratching. Based on interviews and record review, Department is unable to determine if R1's bacterial infection occurred from improper glove usage or from another source. Complaint also stated that facility staff did not have proper transfer training, stating that R1 received multiple bruises from being improperly transferred in their wheelchair or by the hoyer lift. Complaint provided photos to Department which showed bruises on R1's side and arm, and skin tears on R1's toes and arm. Interview with Licensees stated that R1 was on blood thinner medications and received physical therapy services multiple times a week where R1 would be lifted up under their arms and by their pants by family and by the physical therapists. Facility training documentation showed that hoyer lift and safe transfers training were done in June 2024. Facility also conducted transfer training in January 2025. Interviews conducted with facility staff and witnesses revealed conflicting responses. 5 of 5 staff interviews stated that R1 used a wheelchair and did not use a hoyer lift. 1 of 3 witness interviews stated that R1 was able to walk and did not use a hoyer lift. 1 of 3 witness interviews stated that R1 would get bruised or get skin tears because during transfers R1’s arm would hit the door frame or the wall. 1 of 3 witness interviews stated that they observed facility staff use a hoyer lift for R1. Continued on LIC9099C Continued from LIC9099C Per interview, they observed facility staff use the hoyer lift appropriately with 2 staff members. Based on interviews and record review, Department is unable to determine if R1's bruising resulted from staff transfers or from another source. Based on conflicting interview statements, record review, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. “Facility did not ensure maintenance of resident’s personal care equipment”- Complaint alleged that R1’s airflow mattress was broken and caused R1’s pressure injury to worsen. Per complaint, R1’s airflow mattress was broken for over a month and the facility did not notice. Interview conducted with a witness revealed that R1’s airflow mattress was observed to have a deformity in the center. Per interview, R1’s mattress was ordered through a third party vendor for medical equipment and R1’s responsible party contacted the vendor for a new one. Interview further revealed that R1’s mattress was not replaced after a week and that the vendor stated that it was back-ordered. Per interview, the third party vendor did not notify R1’s responsible party or facility staff about the mattress. Interview conducted with Licensees stated that the facility was not allowed to communicate with R1's Primary Care Physician or medical professional team and that all communication regarding medical care was done through R1’s responsible party. Review of facility notes revealed that on 05/25/2025, R1's responsible party reported to facility management about R1's malfunctioning mattress and that that they would replace it. Review of mattress service receipts showed that on 06/06/2025, R1's mattress was delivered and installed. Based on interviews conducted, record review, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. “Facility does not have enough staff for resident care needs” - Complaint alleged that the facility was observed to only have one staff member in the home on the following dates: 10/11/24, 10/26/24, 11/2/24, 11/9/24, 11/16/24, 11/23/24, 11/30/24, 12/7/24, 12/14/24, 12/16/24, 2/8/25, 2/28/25, 3/2/25, 4/14/25. Per complaint, R1 required two-person assistance. Review of R1’s care plan dated 08/25/2023 stated that R1 requires stand-by assistance for their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and had a one-on-one private caregiver. Interview conducted with Licensees and Administrator stated that if a staff member is unable to work or calls in for their day shift, a night shift staff member will stay over to cover care. Interviews also revealed that the Administrator will take over direct care if a staff member is unavailable. 8 of 8 interviews with facility staff and witnesses stated that the facility had at least 2 staff members at the facility, with 1 of 8 interviews stating that they have seen at least 3 or 4 staff members at the home. Continued on LIC9099C Continued from LIC9099C Review of facility’s personnel report and schedule for 2024 and 2025 showed that facility had at least 2 staff members scheduled. Review of facility time sheets for October, November, and December 2024 and for February, March and April 2025 showed that facility was staffed with two people in each home on the identified dates. Time sheets also showed that night shift staff members were clocked in on dates when a day shift staff member was not available. Based on record review, interviews conducted, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Licensees and Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2026 · control 21-AS-20250908113646

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 30, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(a)...each facility...shall provide for assistance...(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on document review, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above. R1 received their Fosfomycin Tromethamine medication every 48 hours instead of every 72 hours as prescribed. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit self-certification that an in-service training will be conducted with all direct staff reviewing The 6 Rights of Medications by POC due date of 01/30/2026. In-service Training to include: Trainer, Date of Training, Topic, Job Title, Staff Names and Signatures. In-service training and supporting documents to be submitted by POC due date of 02/09/2026.

20253 state visits · 3 documents

Dec 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide a safe environment for residents in care Staff accepted a resident that needs a higher level of care

At approximately 9:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Licensees, Erik Flatt and Adam Wascow, and Administrator Matthew Riformo. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The Department investigated the following allegations, “Staff do not provide a safe environment for residents in care and “staff accepted a resident that needs a higher level of care.” Complaint alleged that the facility did not have proper supervision to ensure the safety of residents and staff. Complaint stated that on 07/09/2025 during a facility music activity, Resident 1 (R1) began to have behaviors such as screaming and hitting, and pulling and grabbing at facility staff. Complaint stated that due to R1’s behaviors at the music activity, it resulted in the other residents being left unattended. Continued on LIC9099C Unfounded Continued from LIC9099 Complaint stated that R1 needed more specialized care than the facility could provide and that the other residents required assistance with activities of daily living such as eating, drinking, toileting and dressing. Review of R1's care plan indicated that their activities of daily living were similar to the other residents living within the home. R1’s care plan also stated that they have a history of agitation and had a PRN “as needed” medication for their agitation. R1's documentation did not show any prohibited conditions or other conditions that were different from the other residents in the home that would prevent R1 from being unable to reside in a licensed residential home for the elderly. Review of R1’s documents also showed that the facility corresponded with R1’s responsible party and physician regarding medication for their observed behaviors. Review of facility staff schedule and time sheets showed that on 07/09/2025, the facility had 2 caregivers on-site. Interview conducted with Administrator stated that they are present on-site five times a week to provide additional assistance if needed. Review of 6 of 6 resident care plans showed that none of the residents in the facility required one-on-one supervision or two-person-assistance with their activities of daily living. Review of R1’s documents showed that during R1’s behaviors on 07/09/2025, facility staff acted appropriately and removed R1 from the source of their agitation and administered their as needed medication as prescribed. Based on document review, interviews, and observations made, these allegations are Unfounded. A finding that the complaint is Unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. No Deficiencies Cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Licensees and Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250717142711
Oct 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

At approximately 9:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Required Visit and met with Facility Staff. Licensee/Administrators, Erik Flatt, Adam Waskow, and Administrator, Matthew Riformo arrived during visit at approximately 9:20AM. Facility serves residents with dementia and has a plan of operation for dementia care and programming on file. Facility has an approved fire clearance for 6 non-ambulatory residents and 2 bedridden residents for a total capacity of 6 residents. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 3 individuals. Upon arrival, LPA was informed that there were 6 Residents in care and 2 staff members on-site. LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that all staff on-site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. LPA conducted a walk-though of the facility with Administrator. LPA observed the following: The facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Facility had emergency lighting. Facility is a 1 story building with 6 Resident bedrooms, 1 staff room, 2 bathrooms, and common spaces. Facility has an office space located in the backyard. Facility has an Infection Control plan on file. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations. There was an appropriate supply of cleaning products, linens, hygiene products and paper products available for Residents. Mattress pads were in place or available for Resident use. Toxins were observed to be stored inaccessible to Residents. Hot water temperatures for all sinks in facility were within Title 22 regulations of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Fire extinguishers were last inspected August 2025. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operational. During walk through, LPA observed prepoured medications for afternoon and evening medication (technical violation issued, regulation 87465(h)(5)). LPA reviewed staff files, resident files and resident medication. All files were all found to be well organized, thorough and contained the required documentation. Staff files had current First Aid and CPR certification. Medication was observed to be centrally stored and secure. Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPA requested the following documents to update facility file: Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC 308) Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC 610E) Updated Personnel Report (LIC 500) Updated Liability Insurance Active and Current Administrator Certificate Documents to be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) by due date of 11/16/2025. No Deficiencies Cited during Visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and LIC9102 (Technical Advisories/Violations) discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 9:35AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Required Visit and met with Licensee/Administrator, Erik Flatt and Adam Waskow, and Administrator, Matthew Riformo. Facility serves residents with dementia and has a plan of operation for dementia care and programming on file. Facility has an approved fire clearance for 6 non-ambulatory residents and 2 bedridden residents for a total capacity of 6 residents. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 3 individuals. Upon arrival, LPA was informed that there were 5 Residents in care and 2 staff members on-site. LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that all staff on-site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. LPA reviewed staff files. Staff files had current First Aid and CPR certification. Administrator's Certificates for Erik Flatt (7005115740), Adam Waskow (7014460740), and Matthew Riformo (7013848740) were current with expiration dates of 06/28/2026, 01/16/2026, and 02/15/2027. Facility's last emergency/disaster drill was conducted September 2025. LPA discussed the following topics with Licensees and Administrator: Reporting Requirements PIN regarding 911 protocols PIN regarding dementia regulations LPA unable to complete annual visit. Annual continuation to be conducted at a later date. No Deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2025

20241 state visit · 1 document

Nov 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Required Visit and met with Licensee/Administrator, Erik Flatt and Adam Waskow, and Administrator, Matthew Riformo Facility serves residents with dementia and has a plan of operation for dementia care and programming on file. Facility has an approved fire clearance for 6 non-ambulatory residents and 2 bedridden residents for a total capacity of 6 residents. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 3 individuals. Upon arrival, LPA was informed that there were 4 Residents in care and 2 staff members on-site. LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that all staff on-site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. LPA conducted a walk-though of the facility with Administrator. LPA observed the following: The facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Facility had emergency lighting. Facility is a 1 story building with 6 Resident bedrooms, 1 staff room, 3 bathrooms, and common spaces. Facility has an office space located in the backyard. Facility has an Infection Control plan on file. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations. There was an appropriate supply of cleaning products, linens, hygiene products and paper products available for Residents. Mattress pads were in place or available for Resident use. Toxins were observed to be stored inaccessible to Residents. Hot water temperatures for all sinks in facility were within Title 22 regulations of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Fire extinguishers were last inspected August 2024. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operational. Facility's last emergency/disaster drill was conducted November 2024. LPA reviewed staff files, resident files, and resident medication. All files were all found to be well organized, thorough and contained the required documentation. Staff files had current First Aid and CPR certification. Medication was observed to be centrally stored and secure. Administrator's Certificates for Erik Flatt (7005115740), Adam Waskow (7014460740), and Matthew Riformo (7013848740) were current with expiration dates of 06/28/2026, 01/16/2026, and 02/15/2025. Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPA requested the following documents to update facility file: Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC 308) Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC 610D) Updated Personnel Report (LIC 500) Register of Clients/Residents (LIC 9020) Updated Liability Insurance Active and Current Administrator Certificate Documents to be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) by due date of 12/15/2024. No Deficiencies Cited during Visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2024

20231 state visit · 1 document

Nov 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/21/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola conducted an unannounced Annual Required – 1 yr. inspection visit for this facility and was greeted by Administrators, Erik Flatt & Matthew Riformo. The facility is a one story building licensed for 6 non-ambulatory and 2 bedridden residents, along with a hospice waiver capacity of 3. The facility currently provides care for 6 residents, none of which are receiving hospice services and some of which with a diagnosis of dementia. LPA continued with a tour of the facility with Administrators, facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Resident’s bedrooms, common areas, kitchen & food storage areas were inspected. Fire Extinguishers found throughout the facility were found to be last charged on 9/29/2023 at the time of visit. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors found throughout the facility were interconnected, and found to be in working order. Additional carbon monoxide detectors were also tested and functioning. Auditory alarms at all exits for residents with dementia were tested and fully functioning. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations with food replenished once per week. Food stored in the kitchen and separate food storage in the backyard were properly stored as per regulations on this day at the time of the visit. Facility closely monitors resident diets with appropriate dietary restrictions listed in each resident's file. Toxins are stored in supply closets and under kitchen sinks throughout the facility all of which were found to be secured. There was a supply of PPE, hygiene, continence care and paper products available for residents. All resident’s rooms have lighting & appropriate furnishing. all found to be in clean and safe condition. Water was measured at faucets accessible to residents and measured between 106.0 and 109.0 degrees F which is within regulation. Continued onto LIC809-C Medications were located in designated kitchen cabinets and found to be secured. LPA conducted a spot check of medications and found all administering and records including centrally stored medication records and medication administration records to be in order. During the tour, residents were observed interacting with staff in common spaces, resting in their private bedrooms, visited by family members or in the outdoor patio spaces for leisure. Residents are visited by family frequently and interact with one another in the dinning area, common spaces as well as in resident private rooms. LPA conducted a sample file review for staff and found staff to have 1st Aid & CPR training certification up to date and on file. All staff have completed annual and initial on-boarding training requirements and are on file. All staff have also been properly associated to the facility and confirmed on the Guardian System roster. Upon a spot review of resident files, LPA found residents to have all current required documentation on file including Service Plans and Physician's Reports. LPA and Administrator discuss the appropriate dimensions for Complaint Poster PUB475 and to provide updated photo corrections to CCLD. Technical Advisory issued. Administrator, Erik Flatt's Administrator Certification 6017406740 is currently active through 6/28/2024. LPA requested the following documents be sent to CCL by COB 12/21/2022: LIC 308 Designated Facility Responsibility LIC 500 Personnel Summary LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 9020 Register of Facility Client’s/Resident’s Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during today's visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Apr 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility lacks adequate staffing to meet resident's needs Staff are not bathing resident Staff mismanaged resident's medication

At approximately 9:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Administrator, Adam Waskow. During the course of the Investigation, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias reviewed and requested documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation that the Facility lacks adequate staffing to meet resident’s needs. The Reporting Party (RP) reported that the facility had a lack of staff during the months of December 2022 and January 2023 due to several staff members going out of the country for a vacation. Staff interviews conducted stated that during December 2022 and January 2023 there were always two staff members on shift at a time and that many of them had agreed to work overtime to allow for the other staff members to go on vacation. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099 Interviews also indicated that the Administrators were available at any time and assisted care staff as needed. Time Sheet Records and Facility Staff Schedules indicated that there were at least two caregivers on shift at a time for the months of December 2022 and January 2023. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. There is an allegation that staff are not bathing resident. RP reported that Resident 1 (R1) was observed to have unclean hair by their Responsible Party. Attempts to obtain more information from R1’s Responsible Party were unsuccessful. Records reviewed showed that R1 was given either a shower or a sponge bath consistently every week throughout the months of December 2022 and January 2023. Based on records reviewed, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. There is an allegation that staff mismanaged resident’s medication. RP reported that R1 had been prescribed a medication patch that was to be administered every 12 hours. RP reported that R1’s Responsible Party observed the medication patch to not be on the resident. Attempts to obtain more information from R1’s Responsible Party were unsuccessful. Review of R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) stated that R1 has a prescribed medication patch to be applied every 8 hours and showed that the medication patch had been administered appropriately. Staff Interviews conducted stated that residents with medication patches have them applied in the morning and taken off in the evening. During visit conducted on 04/14/2023, LPA observed a medication patch on R1’s neck. Based on records reviewed, interviews conducted, and observations made, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the Complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No Deficiencies Cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and LIC811 (Confidential Names) discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230112144348

20222 state visits · 2 documents

Oct 19, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived at Three Home Village II for the purpose of conducting an unannounced Required-1 year inspection. LPA was met at the door by carestaff, who performed a Covid-19 test on LPA and granted LPA access into the home. Testing is done prior to entrance for all visitors as a precaution. LPA toured the facility with licensee, Erik Flatt. Facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Exits were equipped with auditory devices. 3 Fire Extinguishers were found to be last charged on 9/1/2022. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were found to be operational during the visit. Hot water temperature measured between 105 and 110 degrees F. The facility tests the water each day for variations in temperature. The facility serves residents with dementia and has a plan of operation for special care and programming. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable food as required by Title 22 Regulations. Toxins are stored under kitchen sink cabinet and small living room closet. There was a supply of cleaners, hygiene products and paper products available for residents. The bathrooms designated for residents at the facility were supplied with individual paper towels and hand soap dispensers. Bathrooms were equipped with necessary grab bars, and non-slip floors/mats were present in the bathroom shower. All bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings. The outdoors of the facility provided attractive and easily accessible garden and visiting areas for residents and their visitors, which is especially beneficial for social distancing. Facility has PPE supply stored in the storage sheds in back yard. Staff have had all PPE training required. Facility is N95 Fit tested. Disaster drills were conducted on 9/16/2022Covid-19 Mitigation Plan and Infection Control Plan were submitted. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's Required 1- Year inspection. Exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Erik Flatt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2022
Jun 16, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to seek timely medical care for resident in care Staff left resident in care in soiled undergarments for extended periods of time Staff failed to inform physician of resident's change in condition Staff failed to inform responsible parties of change in condition

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Recent information confirms that the subject of this complaint is a resident of Three Home Village 3 and is not a resident of Three Home Village 2 This complaint was filed on the wrong facility due to a clerical error. Therefore, based upon this information, these allegations are UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations are false, could not have happened, or are without a reasonable basis. The COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. No citations issued today. Report left at facility. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220527080506

20211 state visit · 1 document

Sep 22, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived at Three Home Village II for the purpose of conducting an unannounced Required-1 year inspection. LPA was met at the door by Licensee, Erik Flatt and granted access into the home. LPA toured the facility with licensee. Facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Exits were equipped with auditory devices. Fire Extinguisher was found to be last charged on 9/2020 at the time of the visit with the next charge date being by the end of the month. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were found to be operational during the visit. Hot water temperature measured between 116 degrees F following of Title 22 acceptable regulation of 105 to 120 degrees F in 3 of 3 resident’s bathrooms while touring facility. The facility serves residents with dementia and has a plan of operation for special care and programming. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable food as required by Title 22 Regulations. Food stored in the kitchen refrigerator were properly stored as per regulations on this day at the time of the visit. Toxins are stored under kitchen sink cabinet and small living room closet. There was a supply of cleaners, hygiene products and paper products available for residents. The bathrooms designated for residents at the facility were supplied with individual paper towels and hand soap dispensers. Bathrooms were equipped with necessary grab bars, and non-slip floors/mats were present in the bathroom shower. All bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings. Resident’s beds were outfitted with mattress pads as required by Title 22 Regulations # 87307 LPA advised facility to contact County Public Health and Community Care Licensing immediately if symptoms or COVID-19 + in the facility. Facility has PPE supply stored in the storage office located in the staff room. Staff have had all PPE training required. Facility is N95 Fit tested on September 8, 2021. Disaster drills were conducted in May 2021. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's Required 1- Year inspection. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was emailed to the facility Licensee, Erik Flatt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2021

6 of 6 beds were occupied at the January 29, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Flaskow LLC, licensed since 2018.

Operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Three Home Village I · San Rafael
  • Three Home Village 3 · San Rafael
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
10
Total complaints
4
Substantiated allegations
1
Type A citations
1
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations10
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations10
Total complaints40

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Three Home Village 2

Is Three Home Village 2 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

How many residents is Three Home Village 2 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

Has Three Home Village 2 been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Three Home Village 2 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Three Home Village 2 cost?

$6,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,950–$7,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Rafael that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,500 to $9,000 a month, and the middle figure is $7,000 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Three Home Village 2 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Flaskow LLC, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. See the homes licensed to Flaskow LLC — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Rafael is 2.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Three Home Village 2 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

Three Home Village 2 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “THREE HOME VILLAGE 2”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #216803746. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • Licensed to Flaskow LLC, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Marin County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    San Rafael · 0.9 mi

    Haven House of San Rafael

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $7,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Rafael · under 0.1 mi

    Three Home Village 3

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,950–$7,400

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Rafael · 1.1 mi

    Daniel Rest Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $5,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Rafael · under 0.1 mi

    Three Home Village I

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,950–$7,400

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Rafael · 0.9 mi

    Haven Residence of San Rafael

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,850–$7,250

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Rafael · 1.2 mi

    Roses Resthome

    Mid-size home · licensed for 8

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,800 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,350–$8,900

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Marin County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
TH

Call Three Home Village 2

San Rafael · Licensed for 6

(415) 492-1215

From the state licensing record · October 25, 2026

From the home’s website, threehomevillage.com:

(415) 461-6136 · main line · seen October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Three Home Village 2

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages