Small home · Licensed for 6 · Whittier
Newcomb Guest Manor
10647 Newcomb Ave, Whittier, CA 90603Licensed since 2021
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 25, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 25, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 25, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 25, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 25, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Newcomb Guest Manor: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,850a month to start
Likely $3,950–$5,950
From 22 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,850likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,850likely $3,950–$5,950
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 22 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,950–$6,150
- $4,850
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,650–$9,350
- $7,350
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes22 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,000
22 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,550.
- Kingdom WorksLa Mirada · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Turning Point Quality CareLa Mirada · 1.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Whittier CottageLa Habra · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Care Marstel 1La Habra · 2.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Monaco Crest Guest HomeHacienda Heights · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Home Sweet HomeHacienda Heights · 2.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Las Palmas Home CareFullerton · 3.4 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Placerville Home CareLa Habra · 3.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Arc Facility at Camino 2Fullerton · 3.7 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Las Estancias Assisted CareBrea · 3.7 mi · Small home$5,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Alondra Guest ManorLa Mirada · 3.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Fullerton Plaza Guest HomesFullerton · 3.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunny Ridge Manor HomeFullerton · 4.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunny VillaFullerton · 4.0 mi · Small home$3,295Listed on its own website · assisted living · seen October 5, 2026
- Amazing Grace & CareFullerton · 4.5 mi · Small home$6,450Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Crown Manor at Paseo GrandeFullerton · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Arc Facility at RichmanFullerton · 4.8 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Rolling Hills Guest HomeFullerton · 4.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Virtud Care IIBrea · 4.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Concordia Guest Home - 3Fullerton · 4.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Karol's KornerFullerton · 4.9 mi · Small home$6,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort Keepers Home CareBrea · 4.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 22 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
10647 Newcomb Ave, Whittier, CA 90603Address from the public record · October 25, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Whittier Hospital Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.5 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 25, 2026 · License #198603461 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced Required 1-year visit using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools. LPA met with Iwona Kaya, administrator for the facility, and explained the purpose of the facility. The following 12 (CARE) tool domains were observed and reviewed: Infection Control, Physical Plant/Environment Safety, Operational Requirements, Staffing, Personnel Records/Staff Training, Resident Rights/Information, Resident Records/Incident Reports, Food Service, Planned Activities, Incident Medical and Dental, Disaster Preparedness, and Residents with Special Health Needs. Infection Control: · Infection control plan is on file. Physical Plant/Environment Safety: · The facility is a single-story home located in a residential neighborhood. The facility consists of four (4) resident bedrooms, an office, a caregiver room, a kitchen, dining room, a living room, and an attached garage that contains the washer and dryer for the facility. The facility contains three (3) bathrooms including checking their water temperature, which all fell within the required range of 105 – 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The carbon monoxide detector is operational in the home. A fully charged fire extinguisher is kept on the premises. The facility was observed to be in good repair. Operational Requirements: · Fire clearance was approved by LA County Fire Department for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, and a hospice waiver approved for six (6) residents. · Care and supervision to meet the clients’ needs was observed. Staffing: · Five (5) full-time staff members provide care and supervision to the clients. Personnel Records/Staff Training: · Five (5) staff files were reviewed for criminal background clearance and training. · All five (5) staff records have a health screening with a Tuberculosis clearance, First Aid/CPR trainings that are active, and required annual trainings. · Administrator’s certificate expires on 8/15/2027. Resident Rights/Information: · Physician orders were reviewed for five (5) resident files. · Medications were also reviewed for five (5) residents. Resident Records/Incident Reports: · Five (5) resident files were reviewed containing admission agreements, Physician's Report, medical/functional assessments, Needs and Services Plans, TB clearance, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, personal rights, medical consent, and medication records were reviewed. were observed. Exit interview held and a copy of the report along with appeal rights were provided. Food Service: · The kitchen was inspected and has sufficient supply of 2-day perishable & 7-day non-perishable food. Kitchen, food preparation area, and storage areas were observed to be clean and sanitary. Incident Medical and Dental: · All residents have are assisted with medication management by staff. Disaster Preparedness: · Emergency and Disaster Plan (LIC610E) was posted in the facility and LPA obtained a copy. · The last emergency and disaster drill was conducted on 5/10/2026. Planned Activities: · Sufficient Space is provided to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities. · Sufficient equipment and supplies are provided to meet the requirements of the activity program. Residents with Special Health Care Needs · There is an adequate number of staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety and health care needs as identified in his/her appraisal. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, no deficiencies following the visit. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 22, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced Required 1-year visit using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools. LPA met with TJ Novallo, caregiver for the facility, and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Iwona Kaya arrived shortly thereafter. There are six (6) non-ambulatory residents residing within the home. The following 12 (CARE) tool domains were observed and reviewed: Infection Control, Physical Plant/Environment Safety, Operational Requirements, Staffing, Personnel Records/Staff Training, Resident Rights/Information, Resident Records/Incident Reports, Food Service, Planned Activities, Incident Medical and Dental, Disaster Preparedness, and Residents with Special Health Needs. Infection Control: · Infection control plan is on file. Physical Plant/Environment Safety: · The facility is a single-story home located in a residential neighborhood. It is licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents over the age of sixty (60), all of whom may receive hospice services. The facility consists of a kitchen, a dining room, a living room, a caregiver room, an office, an attached garage that has the washer and dryer for the facility, four (4) resident bedroom, an office, and three (3) restrooms which had hot water temperature readings of 105.2 Degrees Fahrenheit, 105.4 Degrees Fahrenheit, and 108.1 Degrees Fahrenheit. Facility was observed to be in good repair. · The interior and exterior physical plant was inspected. Exit doors are free of any obstruction. The facility has multiple fully charged fire extinguishers kept in the facility. Operational Requirements: · The Program Design was reviewed. · Fire clearance was approved by LA County Fire Department for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents over the age of sixty (60), all of whom may receive hospice services. · Care and supervision to meet the clients’ needs was observed. Staffing: · Six (6) full-time staff members provide care and supervision to the clients. Personnel Records/Staff Training: · Five (5) staff files were reviewed for criminal background clearance and training. · All Five (5) staff records reviewed have a health screening with a Tuberculosis clearance, and four (4) staff have First Aid/CPR trainings that are active. · One (1) staff member has an expired CPR certificate that needs to be renewed. · The administrator’s certificate expires on 8/25/2025. Resident Rights/Information: · Physician orders were reviewed for six (6) resident files. · Medications were also reviewed for six (6) residents. Resident Records/Incident Reports: · Five (5) resident files were reviewed containing admission agreements, Physician's Report, medical/functional assessments, Needs and Services Plans, TB clearance, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, personal rights, medical consent, and medication records were reviewed. · Two (2) residents did not have reappraisal conducted within the past year. Food Service: · The kitchen was inspected and has sufficient supply of 2-day perishable & 7-day non-perishable food. Kitchen, food preparation area, and storage areas were observed to be clean and sanitary. Incident Medical and Dental: · All residents have an Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan on file. · Staff training was on file. Disaster Preparedness: · Emergency and Disaster Plan (LIC610E) was posted in the facility. · The last emergency and disaster drill was conducted on 4/29/2025. Planned Activities: · Sufficient Space is provided to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities. · Sufficient equipment and supplies are provided to meet the requirements of the activity program. Residents with Special Health Care Needs · There is an adequate number of staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety and health care needs as identified in his/her appraisal. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, the deficiencies observed during the visit is documented on the LIC809D page. Exit interview held and a copy of the report along with appeal rights will be provided by email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide enough food for residents in care
***This report supersedes report dated on 7/16/2024. The reason the report is being superseded is because the deficiency type needs to be updated to a "Type A" violation rather than a "Type B" violation. Additionally, the Plan of Correction (POC) due date needs to be updated as well. All other findings will remain the same.*** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with TJ Navallo, caregiver for the facility, and was granted entrance into the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained the facility staff and resident rosters, examined the food supply for the facility, obtained the FACE Sheets for Residents #1 - 6 (R1 - R6), obtained the admission agreement for R1, and interviewed R1 - R6, Staff #1 - 3 (S1 - S3), and Witness #1 (W1) as well. Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation that "Facility does not have a sufficient food supply," it was alleged that the facility's refrigerator was bare when it was checked. During interviews with the residents, one (1) out of six (6) residents interviewed corroborated the allegation that at times the facility does not have enough food. One of the residents interviewed stated that the food supply is "up and down" at times. Another resident interviewed stated that they get enough food and haven't been aware of the facility being out of food in the past. During interviews with the staff, zero (0) out of three (3) interviewed stated that they do not have a sufficient food supply. One of the staff interviewed stated that they make sure that every resident gets food when they request for it. Another staff interviewed stated that residents get three (3) meals per day along with snacks, and that grocery shopping is done every week. Upon checking the facility's perishable food supply, LPA determined the required two (2) day supply was not met for the six (6) residents living in the facility. Based on LPA interviews conducted with the clients and staff, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met for the above allegations, therefore the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview held and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided to the administrator Iwona Kaya.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240715094833
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2024
(b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and observation, LPA determined that there was not a sufficent 2-day supply of perishable foods within the facility for residents, which poses a potential health and safety risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator is to ensure that the food supply requirement is maintained on the premises at all times. Administrator is to increase the facility's perishable food supply and submit proof to LPA that it has been restocked by the POC due date.
Jul 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility does not have a sufficient food supply Staff would not allow resident to have a visitor Facility staff restricting resident's telephone access
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with TJ Navallo, caregiver for the facility, and was granted entrance into the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained the facility staff and resident rosters, examined the food supply for the facility, obtained the FACE Sheets for Residents #1 - 6 (R1 - R6), obtained the admission agreement for R1, and interviewed R1 - R6, Staff #1 - 3 (S1 - S3), and Witness #1 (W1) as well. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation that "Facility does not have a sufficient food supply," it was alleged that the facility's refridgerator was bare when it was checked. Substantiated During interviews with the residents, one (1) out of six (6) residents interviewed corroborated the allegation that at times the facility does not have enough food. One of the residents interviewed stated that the food supply is "up and down" at times. Another resident interviewed stated that they get enough food and haven't been aware of the facility being out of food in the past. During interviews with the staff, zero (0) out of three (3) interviewed stated that they do not have a sufficient food supply. One of the staff interviewed stated that they make sure that every resident gets food when they request for it. Another staff interviewed stated that residents get three (3) meals per day along with snacks, and that grocery shopping is done every week. Upon checking the facility's perishable food supply, LPA determined the required 2-day supply was not met for the six (6) residents living in the facility. In regards to the allegation that "Staff would not allow resident to have a visitor," it is alleged that family members of R1 have not been allowed to visit R1 since 7/3/2024 due to R1's Power of Attorney (POA) request that they do not visit R1 due to safety concerns. During interviews with the Residents, one (1) out of six (6) residents interviewed did not corroborate the allegation. R1 explained during the interview that they would actually like their family that was prevented from visiting them on 7/15/2024 to visit them. None of the other residents interviewed stated that they are prevented from receiving visitors at the home. During interviews with the staff, none of them corroborated that they are improperly restricting the visitation rights of residents. One staff member interviewed stated that R1 has been financially abused and neglected by the family members in the past, and that is why R1's POA has requested that the other family members of R1 do not visit them at the facility. During record review of R1's POA document LPA did not observe anything in writing indicating that POA can restrict R1's visitation rights. LPA was not provided any legal documentation indicating that R1's visitation rights can be restricted by the facility staff. In regards to the allegation "Facility staff restricting resident's telephone access," it is alleged that the facility staff are not picking up calls from R1's family who have been attempting to contact R1. During interviews with the residents, one (1) out of six (6) residents interviewed indicated that they do not have access to speak with their family through the facility's phone. During an interview with R1 they stated that they have not been allowed to speak with their family members by phone, and they are not aware of the reason why they haven't been allowed to speak with their family. Another resident interviewed stated that sometimes there will be an individual using the phone so it is not immediately available, however it is typically always available. During interviews with the staff, two (2) out of three (3) corroborated that phone calls were restricted for R1's family. One staff interviewed stated that have been advised not to answer the phone whenever the family of R1 calls, and that R1's family calls from various phone numbers. Another staff interviewed was told that R1's POA has a preference that the facility staff do not accept calls from R1's other family members due to the potential for abuse, and therefore they have not been taking R1's family's calls, nor have they been notifying R1 that they are received calls from R1's family. Based on LPA interviews conducted with the clients and staff, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met for the above allegations, therefore the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC9099Ds. Exit interview held and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided to the administrator Iwona Kaya. During interviews with the residents, zero (0) out of six (6) interviewed stated that staff have left them in the bathroom unassisted. During an interview with R1, they stated that they receive assistance with their toileting needs from the staff, and they have never left them in the bathroom when they required assistance. Another resident interviewed stated that they get assistance with their incontinence care from the staff at the facility. Other residents interviewed stated they do not require assistance with their toileting needs. During interviews with staff, zero (0) out of three (3) interviewed did not corroborate the allegation. One staff interviewed stated that they assist R1 with wiping personally by using specialized wipes that they keep in the resident rooms, and when R1 claims they are done toileting they call for this staff member, and the staff always assists in cleaning the resident afterwards. LPA observed the supply of wipes that were kept in the resident's room. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, clients, review of client files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240715094833
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 30, 2024
(b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and observation, LPA determined that there was not a sufficent 2-day supply of perishable foods within the facility for residents, which poses a potential health and safety risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator is to ensure that the food supply requirement is met at the facility at all times. Administrator is to increase the facility's perishable food supply and submit proof to LPA that it has been restocked by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(11) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 30, 2024
(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (11) To have their visitors (...) permitted to visit privately during reasonable hours (...) provided that the rights of other residents are not infringed upon. This regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, LPA determined that R1 has been denied visitation from his family members during his stay at the facility, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator is to ensure that all residents are allowed visitors at all times if the resident agrees they wish to see the visitors. Administrator is to submit a written plan on how the facility will mee the requirement going forward by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 30, 2024
(a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To have (...) telephone conversations (...) and meetings of resident and family groups. This regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, LPA determined that the resident had not been allowed to speak with their family members on the phone when they called the facility, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator is to ensure that all residents are allowed to speak with their family members when they call the facility number. Administrator is to submit to LPA the facility's plan on how they will meet the regulation by the POC due date.
Jun 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced Required 1-year visit using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to Gerardo Navallo, caregiver for the home, and was granted entrance to the facility. Administrator Iwona Kaya arrived shortly thereafter. There are five (5) residents currently living in the facility, of which one (1) of them is on hospice. The following 12 (CARE) tool domains were observed and reviewed: Infection Control, Physical Plant/Environment Safety, Operational Requirements, Staffing, Personnel Records/Staff Training, Resident Rights/Information, Resident Records/Incident Reports, Food Service, Planned Activities, Incident Medical and Dental, Disaster Preparedness, and Residents with Special Health Needs. Infection Control: · Infection control plan was present within the facility. Physical Plant/Environment Safety: · The facility is a single-story home located in a residential neighborhood. It is licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, along with a hospice waiver approved for six (6) residents. The facility consists of a kitchen, a living room, a dining room, four (4) resident rooms, a staff room, an office, three (3) resident bathrooms of all three (3) had a hot temperature reading between 97.7 Degrees F, 97.1 Degrees F, all of which fell below the required range of 105 – 120 degrees Fahrenheit, a backyard patio area, and an attached garage that contains the facility’s washer and dryer machines and emergency food supplies. The facility’s chemicals, cleaning supplies, and knives are kept locked and inaccessible to residents. The facility was observed to be in good repair. ·The interior and exterior physical plant was inspected. Exit doors are free of any obstruction. The facility has two (2) fully charged fire extinguisher located in the kitchen of the facility as well as in the garage. · Water temperature readings fell below the required range of 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Operational Requirements: · The Program Design was reviewed. · Fire clearance was approved by LA County Fire Department for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, along with an approved hospice waiver for six (6) residents · Care and supervision to meet the clients’ needs was observed. Staffing: · Six (6) full-time staff members provide care and supervision to the clients. Personnel Records/Staff Training: · Five (5) staff files were reviewed for criminal background clearance and training. · Four (4) out of five (5) staff records reviewed have health/TB screenings, however one (1) did not have a completed health screening on file. All had current 1st Aid/CPR training. · The administrator’s certificate expires on 8/15/2025. Resident Rights/Information: · Physician orders were reviewed for five (5) resident files. · Medications were also reviewed for five (5) residents. Resident Records/Incident Reports: · Five (5) resident files were reviewed containing admission agreements, Physician's Report, medical/functional assessments, Needs and Services Plans, TB clearance, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, personal rights, medical consent, and medication records were reviewed. Food Service: · The kitchen was inspected and has sufficient supply of 2-day perishable & 7-day non-perishable food. Kitchen, food preparation area, and storage areas were observed to be clean and sanitary. Incident Medical and Dental: · All residents have an Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan on file. · Staff training was on file. Disaster Preparedness: · Emergency and Disaster Plan was publicly posted and found within the facility. · The last emergency and disaster drill was conducted on 6/11/2024. Planned Activities: · Sufficient Space is provided to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities. · Sufficient equipment and supplies are provided to meet the requirements of the activity program. Residents with Special Health Care Needs: · A hospice care plan was in place for the one (1) resident who is on hospice. · There is an adequate number of staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety and health care needs as identified in his/her appraisal. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, the deficiencies observed during the visit is documented on the LIC809D. Exit interview held and a copy of the report along with appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 14, 2024
May 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Administrator did not provide a refund to resident's responsible party.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit to this facility and met Iwona Kaya, administrator. The purpose of today’s visit and the allegation were discussed. The investigation consisted of residents/ staff interviews, facility tours, and review of facility records. LPA obtained resident/staff roster and residents’ facility files. The investigation revealed the following: In regards of Administrator did not provide a refund to resident's responsible party, it was alleged that administrator failed to refund the remaining balance from the resident’s account to the responsible party after moved out. LPA attempted but failed to interview resident#1 (R1). Per resident interviews, from resident#2 to resident #4, all three (3) residents could not corroborate the allegation. Resident interviews revealed that residents had never requested a refund since residing at the facility. (-continued in LIC 9099C-) Unsubstantiated Per staff interview, from staff#1 to staff#3, all three (3) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed that administrator would handle the refund. Per administrator interview, the 2nd refund check was mailed out to the responsible party two days ago. Per record review, the balance was fully refunded. Therefore, administrator had refunded the resident's remaining balance to the responsible party. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, interviews with staff, residents, review of resident files and LPA's observation, the investigation did not reveal any evidence to support the allegations mentioned above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with administrator and the finding was discussed. A copy this report was provided at time of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240521111539
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 4 documents
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has failed to provide resident's medical records
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos made an unannounced initial complaint visit in response to the above mentioned allegation. LPA Villalobos met with Administrator Iwona Kaya and the purpose of the visit was discussed. Iniital visit conducted on 1/5/23 and consisted of the following: LPA interviewed Administrator telephonically (S1) and toured the physical plant. LPA requested the following documents from Resident #1's (R1s) file: Facehseet, Physicians Report, Medication Records Log for the last month, Needs and Services Plan, Appraisal Sheet. As of todays visit, LPA interviewed Residents #2-#5 (R2-R5), Staff #2-#3 (S2-S3) and R1's responsible party. R1 is no longer in the facility and was unavailable for interview. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated In regards to the allegation "Facility has failed to provide resident's medical records" it was alleged that R1's medical records were requested by an authorized representative and the facility did not provide them. (3) of (3) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (4) of (4) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews state that R1's responsible party had hired a law firm to collect medical records for R1. The medical records for R1 were requested on 12/21/22 by the firm. Once the facility verified the request, a copy of R1's file was provided via verified mail on 12/24/22. Interviews with S1 and R1's responsible party state that the medical records were meant to have been requested from a different facility where R1 had resided in the past and not from this facility. The facility would not have the medical records, that were being requested by the firm, that were from a time prior to R1 being admitted into the facility. R1's responsible party confirmed these details and did not have issue with the facility. Based on interviews, observations, and file review there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 28-AS-20221227120626
Jul 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos, conducted a required annual inspection using the Inspection Tool. LPA met with Administrator Iwona Kaya and the purpose of the visit was discussed. Structure/Physical Plant: The facility is part of a single story home located in a residential area and contains the following: living room, dining room, kitchen with refrigerator, oven, stove, dishwasher, sink/faucet, locked storage cabinet for medications and sharps, (4) resident rooms, (1) live in staff rooms (2) bathrooms for residents and (1) bathroom for the live in staff; bathrooms with shower, toilet and washbasin. A back yard with shaded area and seating for resident use. A connected garage inaccessible to residents for storage and Laundry; with washer and dryer. The residence is equipped with air conditioning in each room. Accommodations: Adequate accommodations observed throughout facility.Hallway and Doorways: Free and clean of obstruction and debris. Resident Rooms: All bedrooms are equipped with: overhead lighting, chair, night stand, lamp in addition to overhead lighting, large drawer, and closet space. Bathrooms: All bathrooms have a working toilet, wash basin, shower, grab bars and nonskid mats.Linens & Hygiene Supplies: Required linen/supplies observed. Emergency Phone Numbers, Exit Plan & Menu: Facility has a working phone landline. There are (2) cordless phone for residents use. Fire Extinguisher 1 and 2 fully charged and up to date Food Service: All food and adequate utensils such as, dishes, cups, bowls and plates are stored at the other location until residents move in. Knives, cutlery and other sharps inaccessible to residents. Smoke Detectors & Fire Extinguishers: Detectors Electrical & connected. Battery operated & working, all detectors tested and operational. (2) Fire extinguishers observed. Toxins: Locked/stored for staff use only. Hot Water Temperature: Measured between 110 -115 degrees all around the home. Medications, First-Aid Kit & Book: Medications centrally stored and inaccessible to residents. First aid kit observed. Postings: Required wall postings observed.Residents & Staff Files: LPA reviewed (6) of (6) Resident medication records and files , as well as (4) Staff Files . Inspection tool was completed and no deficiencies were observed. Exit interview was conducted, and a Facility Evaluation Report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2023
Jan 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff was having sex with their boyfriend at the facility. Uncleared adult at the facility. Facility did not provide a comfortable environment for resident. Facility did not provide a safe environment for resident.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Galarza & Erik Zaragoza conducted an initial 10-Day complaint visit to investigate the above allegations.The purpose of the visit was discussed caregiver staff Marietta Woller. Administrator Iwona Kaya arrived shortly after. The investigation consisted of: An inspection of the interior and exterior physical plant was conducted. Staff (S1-S4) and residents (R1- R5) were interviewed. Resident (R6) was not present and was interviewed telephonically. Resident file documents: [Identification and Emergency Information, Preplacement Appraisal, and Physician's Reports were reviewed and obtained. Former staff (S5's) Personnel Record, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident roster were obtained. See LIC 9099C for report continuation. Substantiated Allegation: Facility staff was having sex with their boyfriend at the facility. It is alleged that a caregiver staff's boyfriend slept over the facility between dates November 24, 2022 - December 2022. On multiple times, former caregiver staff (S5) and boyfriend were overheard having sex, as well engaging in arguments. Two (2) out of six (6) residents confirmed that they overheard staff (S5) and boyfriend have sex with it's boyfriend. Four (4) out of six (6) residents stated that they overheard staff (S5) argue with boyfriend during nighttime hours. All staff interviewed denied having knowledge that former staff (S5) had sex with boyfriend in the premises. Staff (S5) worked temporarily at the facility between November 1, 2022 - December in order to provide staff coverage because another staff was on an extended vacation. There are 2 caregiver rooms in the home. Former staff (S5) was living in the caregiver room next to the office that has an entrance on the north side yard. Staff stated it is possible that staff (S5) sneaked in it's boyfriend since the caregiver door leads to the side yard. Administrator stated that S5's boyfriend was not allowed to sleep/reside in the property. However, staff stated that sometimes staff (S5's) boyfriend parked in the garage driveway and slept in it's vehicle. Allegation: Uncleared adult at the facility. It is alleged that former staff (S5's) boyfriend slept at the facility over night while staff (S5) worked at the facility. Based on interviews conducted, the findings indicate that Administrator hired S5's boyfriend to paint the interior of the house as a third party contractor. The project lasted approximately two (2) weeks. The boyfriend worked at the facility from 10:00 am - 9:00 pm. Administrator stated that livescan fingerprints were not obtained. However, since the "boyfriend" spent at minimum 11 hours a day three (3) to four (4) times a week at the facility and was observed by residents staying and hanging out in caregiver's room there is sufficient evidence to corroborate that former staff (S5's) boyfriend required criminal record clearance. Four (4) out six (6) residents stated they observed staff (S5's) boyfriend inside the facility during daytime and nighttime hours. In addition, staff (S4) began working at the facility in late December and has not been associated to the facility. Administrator Iwona Kaya stated she does not have access to Guardian database because former Administrator is still the account user. See LIC 9099C for report continuation Allegation: Facility did not provide a comfortable environment for resident. It is alleged that the facility has narrow doorways that make it difficult to ambulate to and from when using a wheelchair and/or walker. Based on physical plant inspection observation three (3) out of four (4) resident bedrooms had doorways that were narrow in size, of which a regular size wheelchair and walker could not fit in order to exit the door. One (1) resident bedroom is missing a door due to the narrow doorway entrance. The resident that lives in the room requires wheelchair and walker devices. These assist devices could not safely exit the room door if there was a door. Three (3) out of six (6) residents stated the facility does not provide a comfortable environment. All staff stated the facility is comfortable. However, staff acknowledged the bedroom doorways are narrow and some resident's wheelchairs and walkers are not able to fit through the doorway. Allegation: Facility did not provide a safe environment for resident. It is alleged that the facility has tripping hazards, such as uneven floors inside the facility due to different flooring types i.e. tile, laminate flooring, and flooring trim transitions. Based on observation, different types of flooring trim transitions were observed throughout the facility. In addition, the backyard concrete pavers were raised at least 3 inches posing a tripping hazard for residents and staff. The backyard had a wood plank planter divider that was raised approximately 6 inches from the floor. The wood plank had nails sticking out of the wood. Discarded furniture debris was also observed in the north side of the yard. The facility has two side yard passageways; only the north side has an exit to the front of the property. The north side exit door had a lock that required a key on the door. Administrator immediately unlocked the lock and removed the lock. Therefore, observations made corroborate the allegation. Based on interviews conducted, record review, and observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited. See LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Iwona Kaya. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 13, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230104092941
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(d) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 14, 2023
Personnel Requirements - General (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience in the job assigned to them. This training and/or related experience shall provide knowledge of and skill in the following, as appropriate for the job assigned and as evidenced by safe and effective job performance: This requirement was not met evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted the findings indicate that former live-in staff (S5) allowed boyfriend to sleep at the facility. Staff (S5) and boyfriend were heard having sex and arguing on multiple times; which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator shall submit a written plan of correction that states what was done. Submit proof of staff training regarding the regulation, and staff conduct. POC is due tomorrow.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 14, 2023
Criminal Record Clearance. (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c). Based on record review and interviews conducted staff (S4) began working at the facility in late Dec. 2022, and as of today has not been associated to the facility. In addition, former staff (S5's) boyfriend was residing at the facility without criminal record clearance; which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator shall submit proof that staff (S4) has been associated via Guardian database. In addition, a written plan shall be submitted that states what was done regarding staff visitors sleeping in the premises. Submit proof of staff training.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(2)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 10, 2023
Personal Accommodations and Services. (a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function. The facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations .... (2) Resident bedrooms shall ... (A) Bedrooms shall be large enough to allow for easy passage between and comfortable usage of beds and other required items of furniture specified below, and any resident assistant devices such as wheelchairs or walkers. Based on observation, three (3) out of four (4) resident bedrooms had doorways that were narrow in size. Assist devices could not safely exit the room door if there was a door. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator shall submit a written plan of correction of how this was corrected. Submit picture proof evidence by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 10, 2023
Maintenance and Operation. (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not evidenced by: Based on observation, flooring trim transitions were observed througout the facility, as well as, raised concrete pavers in the backyard that contained nails that were sticking out. The north side yard door exit had a lock that required a key; which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator shall submit picture proof corrections made and a written statement of what was done to correct the deficiency.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Jun 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos made and unannounced Annual inspection focused on Infection Control. On today’s visit LPA met with Administrator Iwona Kaya. The purpose of the visit was discussed. As a part of the inspection, LPA used the inspection tool, reviewed (4) resident records, (4) staff files, and (4) resident medications. Currently the facility has (4) residents which (4) are non-ambulatory. Facility is a one story family home with four (4) client bedrooms, one (1) bedroom for live in staff, three (3) bathrooms, living room, kitchen, central air and heating, dining area, laundry room, a shaded area located in the backyard. an attached garage inaccessible to residents. Front and back yard is in good condition at time of visit. Washer/Dryer appliances observed. Toxins and sharps locked and inaccessible to clients. Bedrooms #1-#4 required furnishing. Bathroom have a working toilet, wash basin, and shower. Beds have the required linen/supplies which include, pillowcase, mattress padding, fitted sheet, blanket and bedspreads. Supply of hygiene supplies were observed. Fire alarms are interconnected and operational. Required postings observed. Water temperature within required tittle 22 regulations. Infection control domain completed and there were no deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2022
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the September 10, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Newcomb Guest Manor, Inc., licensed since 2021.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 11
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 7
- Type A citations
- 4
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 4 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 7 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Newcomb Guest Manor
Is Newcomb Guest Manor licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
How many residents is Newcomb Guest Manor licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Has Newcomb Guest Manor been cited?
4 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is Newcomb Guest Manor still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Newcomb Guest Manor cost?
$4,850 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,950–$5,950. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 22 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Newcomb Guest Manor take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Newcomb Guest Manor, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Whittier Hospital Medical Center is 1.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Newcomb Guest Manor keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Newcomb Guest Manor license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “NEWCOMB GUEST MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #198603461. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- Licensed to Newcomb Guest Manor, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- 4 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 7 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 22, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$1,550 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County