Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Las Estancias Assisted Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Brea, California

Licensed since 2014Licence #306004655
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Starting rate$5,600 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedNovember 4, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 3, 2026CDSS inspection record

Las Estancias Assisted Care is a small care home in Brea — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2014. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Las Estancias Assisted Care

Is Las Estancias Assisted Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Las Estancias Assisted Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Las Estancias Assisted Care been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Las Estancias Assisted Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Las Estancias Assisted Care cost?

$5,600 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 187 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 187 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Las Estancias Assisted Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Barroque, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kindred Hospital Brea is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Las Estancias Assisted Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Las Estancias Assisted Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LAS ESTANCIAS ASSISTED CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306004655. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Barroque, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FIVE NON AMBULATORY ONE BEDRIDDEN, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED ONLY IN MASTER BEDROM IN FRONT OF HOUSE.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$5,600a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$5,600a month

Likely $5,600–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,600this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,600–$6,200
$5,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,600–$9,700
$7,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living, seen September 9, 2026.

10 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,900–$6,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1409 Whittier Avenue, Brea, CA 92821Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2014. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 15, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
August 3, 2026
Occupied · November 4, 2024 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 16, 2023 to November 4, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2014.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202433020232212022110

The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

LIcensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to conduct an Annual Required Evaluation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Staff #1 (S1) at 1:15pm. LPA met with Administrator Celia Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is a five bedroom, three bathroom single-story residence with an approved fire clearance for five non-ambulatory and one bedridden. The facility is approved for a hospice waiver for three. Currently no residents are on hospice at this time. During the visit LPA toured the kitchen and observed the refrigerator had two days of perishable items and seven days of non-perishables. All appliances were operational. Sharps and knives are secured and cleaning supplies are locked underneath the sink. The washer and dryer room are adjacent to the kitchen and are in working order. The fire extinguisher was charged and serviced and the facility conducted a fire drill on April 14, 2026. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were inspected and were operational. LPA toured resident rooms and all bedrooms had linens, and required furnishings. The facility was clean and there were no odors detected. LPA tested hot water temperature in two of two resident bathrooms. The hot water temperature ranged between 108.5 to 113.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom showers had grab bars and non-skid flooring. LPA observed medication storage and reviewed the centrally stored medications. Per review medications are being given as prescribed. A First Aid Kit had the required elements and a First Aid Book was obtained. (Continued on LIC 809-C) .(Continued from LIC 809) Upon walking the exterior, LPA observed all walkways were clear and unobstructed. There is ample space for walking and outdoor activities and shaded seating areas are available. Emergency supplies and water were stored in the garage and the facility has two generators. LPA reviewed two of two staff training and fingerprint records and conducted a complete review of resident records. Bedrail orders for half and full side rails were observed. Files were maintained and it was discussed that paperwork is required to be retained for three years. LPA discussed updating Appraisal Needs and Services Plans and Medical Assessments if any changes of condition occur. Staff training documentation was electronic and was recommended to print in each employee file. LPA interviewed alert residents regarding their quality of care and spoke to staff present regarding care provided. LPA confirmed that administrator has a current administrator certificate which expires on July 19, 2026. Administrator (AD) will be paying fees by due date and a fact sheet for Legionnaire's Disease was given to the AD for review. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, the facility appears to be in compliance with Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, no deficiencies cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator (AD) Celia Rodriguez and a copy of the report and files reviewed (LIC 858 & LIC 859) were given at the time of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to the facility today to conduct an Annual Required Evaluation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Celia Rodriguez, Administrator, at 12:30pm, and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is a five bedroom, two client bathroom, single- story residence with an approved fire clearance of five non-ambulatory residents of which one may be bedridden. The facility currently has a census of three residents in care. At time of entry residents were enjoying lunch and one had a visiting family member. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and inspected the physical plant, including but not limited to testing all smoke detectors, testing hot water temperature in two of two resident bathrooms, and testing auditory devices on all exits. The hot water temperature measured between 112.6 and 117.8 degrees Fahrenheit and all smoke detectors were operational. The fire extinguisher is charged and the facility’s last fire drill was conducted on January 25, 2025. LPA inspected the facility food supply and observed the facility retained a minimum of two days perishable and seven days non-perishable food on hand. Sharps and disinfectants were secured and appliances were in working order. LPA observed additional Personal Protective Equipment and emergency supplies in the garage. LPA observed medication storage and reviewed the centrally stored medications. Per review medications are being given as prescribed. The First Aid kit had all the required elements. LPA toured the facility exterior and observed a shaded seating area, a small birdbath and ample outdoor space for walks and activities. The facility has a self-latching, unlocked exterior gate and the outside perimeter has video surveillance. (Continued on LIC 809-C) (Continued from LIC 809) LPA reviewed two of two staff training and fingerprint records and conducted a complete review of resident records. LPA interviewed alert residents regarding their quality of care and spoke to staff present regarding care provided. LPA confirmed that administrator has a current administrator certificate which expires on July 19, 2026. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, the facility appears to be in compliance with Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, no deficiencies cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Celia Rodriguez, Administrator and a copy of the report and files reviewed (LIC 858 & LIC 859) were given at the time of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: -Patient's rights violaton. -Resident is being evicted illegally from the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to deliver findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door by staff and granted entry. LPA spoke with Celia Rodriguez, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included records review, interviews with the following: 3 out of 3 staff interviewed, a witness and 3 of 3 residents. It is alleged that patient’s rights violation. Record review from Providence St. Jude Medical Center on May 5, 2024, indicated that resident (R1) was discharge as follows patient other criteria for discharge: will go with infinite hospice to board and care. Records for Newport Hospice indicate that R1 was admitted on hospice care on May 6, 2024, singed by R1’s responsible party. Interview with 3 of 3 staff indicated that R1 was in the hospital and when discharged they were placed on hospice care. When R1 returned to the Continued LIC9099-C Unfounded facility they were already on hospice care. R1 was discharged on Infinite Hospice, but R1’s responsible party decided to go with Newport Hospice the day R1 was released, and it was changed. Interview with 3 of 3 residents indicated that they had never witnessed staff yelling at another resident or to them. It is alleged that resident is being evicted illegally from the facility. Interview with witness (W1) revealed that the Administrator told them, “They would be happier if they moved somewhere else". The Administrator denied this report. The Administrator reported that an eviction notice was never sent to R1 or their responsible party. This information was verified by W1. R1 was moved out on May 29, 2024, by choice of responsible party. R1's belongings were moved out of the facility by June 8, 2024. W1 verified that they decided to move R1 out of the facility and they were not forced to move. None of the evidence gathered supports the allegation. We have found the complaint allegation is unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this LIC9099 report was left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240521101351
Jun 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident was unlawfully evicted from facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Celia Rodriguez and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation revealed the following. LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was unlawfully evicted from the facility. Witness 1 (W1) reported that the Administrator told them, "they would be happier if they moved somewhere else". The Administrator denied this report. The Administrator reported that an eviction notice was never sent to R1 or their responsible party. This information was verified by W1. R1 moved out on May 29, 2024. All witnesses interviewed verified this report. R1's belongings were moved out of the facility by June 8, 2024. W1 verified that they decided to move R1 out of the facility and they were not forced to move. None of the evidence gathered supports the allegation. Based on the evidence gathered through interviews the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy the report provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240605160556
Apr 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Celine De Perio and Faith La conducted an unannounced required annual inspection. LPA De Perio explained reason for visit and was greeted and granted entry by facility administrator (AD) Celia Rodriguez. The PUB475 "See Something, Say Something" poster was observed to be posted in the kitchen. LPAs observed the Administrator's Certificate for Cecila Rodriguez, which expires on 7/19/24. LPAs toured the interior and exterior portions of the facility with AD Rodriguez. The facility is a single level structure and is licensed for 6 non-ambulatory, 1 bedridden and 3 hospice. For this visit, there are 0 residents on hospice and 0 bedridden. There are a total of 5 bedrooms, of which 4 are private resident rooms and 1 shared resident room. LPAs toured each bedroom in the facility and observed that bedrooms were provided with furniture in good repair, clean linens, adequate storage space, and kept free of tripping hazards. Smoke and carbon monoxide detector and auditory exit alarms were tested and operational. There are a total of 3 restrooms of which were observed to be in good repair, toilets were operational, and grab bars and non-skid floor mats were provided. Water temperature in restrooms were measured to be at 110.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility met the minimum two-day perishable and seven-day non-perishable food supplies. Sharp items and knives were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Fire extinguisher was charged, mounted and located in the kitchen. LPAs observed the emergency disaster and evacuation plan, which is posted in the kitchen. Facility had back-up emergency food and water supply, located in the kitchen and in the garage. LPAs observed that First Aid Kit had all the required components. Medications and toxins were also observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. For the exterior portion, LPAs observed patio furniture under shading, and the grounds were free of any hazards. There are 2 gates in the backyard, which were self-closing and self-latching. No bodies of water were observed. For today's visit no deficiencies were issued per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. No citations were issued. An exit interview was conducted with AD Rodriguez. A copy of this report was explained, and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not report abuse as mandated.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the complaint received on June 7, 2023. LPA arrived at the facility and explained the purpose of today’s visit, was greeted, and granted entry by facility administrator (AD) Celia Rodriguez. The complaint was investigated by the Department which involved interviews and record review. It was alleged that licensee did not report abuse as mandated. On August 31, 2023, interviews were conducted with staff and residents at the facility. An interview conducted with AD stated that upon learning about the allegation, AD informed Licensing via phone call, contacted Adult Protective Services (APS), the police, and that the facility conducted their own internal investigation. Per AD, “since I called about it, there was no reason for me to write a report”. Due to APS also being informed about the incident, APS initiated their own investigation. 5 interviews conducted with residents were unable to provide further information regarding this allegation. Substantiated 4 interviews conducted with staff stated that if there was abuse occurring, the facility would have reported it immediately. LPA De Perio conducted reviews of incident reports from the facility, and it was observed that the facility did not submit a written incident report. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted, review of documents obtained, and observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with AD Rodriguez. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided and explained. Following that statement, R1 became visibly and verbally agitated and stated, “let me go, let me go”. R1 then refused to answer any more questions, and upon the conclusion of the interview, R1’s demeanor had changed, and was smiling. Per R1’s physician report dated for March 8, 2023, R1 has mild cognitive impairment, is non-ambulatory, is unable to transfer self independently, on and off the bed, and was on hospice. The investigation revealed that R1 never provided any disclosure regarding sexual assault or being hurt by any staff. LPA De Perio interviewed 5 out of 5 residents who confirmed not being hurt or witnessing anyone being hurt. 4 interviews conducted with staff, denied observing any resident being hurt or abused in the facility. It was alleged that staff did not contact the police/doctor upon resident request. On August 31, 2023, interviews were conducted with staff and residents at the facility. The 5 interviews conducted with residents stated that if needed or requested, the facility contacts 911 upon resident’s request. Resident 1 (R1), resident 2 (R2), resident 3 (R3) and resident 4 (R4) specified that the facility does a “good job” at communicating with each resident’s medical team. 4 interviews conducted with staff stated that the facility contacts the appropriate responders such as police, and 911 regardless if the resident requests it or not and depending on the incident. Staff 1 (S1) specified “we would rather be safe than sorry”. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted, review of documents obtained, and observations, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with AD Rodriguez. A copy of this report was provided an explained.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230607152424

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 2, 2023

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on record reviews, and interviews, facility administrator informed licensing agency regarding the allegation via phone call, however, did not complete and submit a written report. This poses a potential threat on the health and safety to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will provide a training to all staff regarding the regulation cited, obtain signatures of staff present, and submit proof of understanding to assigned LPA on or by 11/02/2023.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County