Emerald Senior Care,inc. is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Granada Hills, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610318, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated August 21, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

16 homes in view

Emerald Senior Care,inc.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Granada Hills, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197610318, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
10401 Encino Ave. · Granada Hills, Los Angeles County
Phone
(747) 300-2232
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM #5 CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 10 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 21, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

Most recent state visit
April 22, 2026
Occupancy at the August 21, 2025 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 30, 2024 to August 21, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20251 state visit · 2 documents
Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff unlawfully evicted resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) was moved to another facility unlawfully, on or around 08/17/25. When asked why, R1 gave no specific reason why other than having too much belongings that prompted the move. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator, staff, and residents. LPA also conducted a physical plant inspection and reviewed facility records. Prior to making this investigation, LPA checked facility file to see if an eviction notice was submitted, but didn't find one on file. Interviews with the administrator and staff deny the allegation. According to the administrator, R1 has a Power of Attorney (POA), who made the decision to move R1 to another facility. R1 was advised of this move and agreed to it. Interviews with five (5) of five residents was inconsistent and do not corroborate with the allegation. In addition to interviethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250819123103
Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 5 documents
Sep 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff over medicated resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) was given a double dose of their medication, because according to facility staff, it would help them to sleep better. LPA met with both administrators, Hayk Margaryan and Hovhannes Papazyan, and advised them of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of interviews, a physical plant inspection and record review. Interviews with both administrators deny the allegation. Both administrators stated R1's physician increased the dosage of their medication by two for anxiety and insomnia. LPA conducted a record review, and observed a physician's order to increase their Lorazepam from one tablet orally per day to two tablets orally per day. Order date made was 08/24/24. Interviews with six (6) of six residents also deny the allegation. These residents did not express any complaints regarding their medications. Based on the infothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240909115151
Sep 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not allowing resident to leave the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:15 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:33 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:30 AM to 11:40 AM. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was not allowed to leave the facility with R1's Power of Attorney (POA) by the facility staff. LPA's record review today at 10:00 AM revealed that R1 was admitted at this facility on 05/23/23 and had revoked R1's POA on 01/27/2024. Further review also revealed that R1 was able to follow instruction and able to communicate own needs and does not have dementia diagnosis. LPA's interview with R1 revealed that R1 was aware that R1 revoked own POA and did not want to leave the facility. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview condthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240320145409
Jan 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist resident with obtaining therapy services Staff do not provide adequate food service to resident Staff are not allowing resident to move out of the facility Staff prevent resident from having visitors

Licensing Program Analyst, LPA Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Hovhannes Papazyan, and advised him of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of a physical plant inspection to insure the health and safety of the residents, which was made approximately 9:15am to 10:00am, interviews with the administrator, staff and residents, held at approximately 10:00am to 12:00pm, and record review, held between 12:00pm to 1:00pm. Staff do not assist resident with obtaining therapy services: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that the licensee has failed to assist Resident 1 (R1) with obtaining physical therapy (PT) for their legs. According to the administrator, PT was never ordered by R1's primary physician or R1's hospice services. Interview with R1 was made, and R1 deny that they require PT. Interview with the hospice agency also do not corroborate with the alegation of R1 not gettingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240125085213
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints0typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file10typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025120202445020231102022220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (747) 300-2232

Is Emerald Senior Care,inc. licensed?

Yes — Emerald Senior Care,inc. is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Granada Hills (Los Angeles County): California license #197610318, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated August 21, 2025, was marked “Unfounded” by the state.

Can Emerald Senior Care,inc. care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Emerald Senior Care,inc. with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM #5 CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

How much does Emerald Senior Care,inc. cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Emerald Senior Care,inc.'s monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Emerald Senior Care,inc. accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Emerald Senior Care,inc. through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on August 21, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Emerald Senior Care,inc.?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 10 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2022 for Emerald Senior Care,inc.; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 21, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff unlawfully evicted resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) was moved to another facility unlawfully, on or around 08/17/25. When asked why, R1 gave no specific reason why other than having too much belongings that prompted the move. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator, staff, and residents. LPA also conducted a physical plant inspection and reviewed facility records. Prior to making this investigation, LPA checked facility file to see if an eviction notice was submitted, but didn't find one on file. Interviews with the administrator and staff deny the allegation. According to the administrator, R1 has a Power of Attorney (POA), who made the decision to move R1 to another facility. R1 was advised of this move and agreed to it. Interviews with five (5) of five residents was inconsistent and do not corroborate with the allegation. In addition to intervieCDSS inspection report, August 21, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250819123103

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff over medicated resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) was given a double dose of their medication, because according to facility staff, it would help them to sleep better. LPA met with both administrators, Hayk Margaryan and Hovhannes Papazyan, and advised them of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of interviews, a physical plant inspection and record review. Interviews with both administrators deny the allegation. Both administrators stated R1's physician increased the dosage of their medication by two for anxiety and insomnia. LPA conducted a record review, and observed a physician's order to increase their Lorazepam from one tablet orally per day to two tablets orally per day. Order date made was 08/24/24. Interviews with six (6) of six residents also deny the allegation. These residents did not express any complaints regarding their medications. Based on the infoCDSS inspection report, September 18, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240909115151
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not allowing resident to leave the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:15 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:33 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:30 AM to 11:40 AM. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was not allowed to leave the facility with R1's Power of Attorney (POA) by the facility staff. LPA's record review today at 10:00 AM revealed that R1 was admitted at this facility on 05/23/23 and had revoked R1's POA on 01/27/2024. Further review also revealed that R1 was able to follow instruction and able to communicate own needs and does not have dementia diagnosis. LPA's interview with R1 revealed that R1 was aware that R1 revoked own POA and did not want to leave the facility. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview condCDSS inspection report, March 29, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240320145409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not assist resident with obtaining therapy services Staff do not provide adequate food service to resident Staff are not allowing resident to move out of the facility Staff prevent resident from having visitors
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, LPA Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Hovhannes Papazyan, and advised him of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of a physical plant inspection to insure the health and safety of the residents, which was made approximately 9:15am to 10:00am, interviews with the administrator, staff and residents, held at approximately 10:00am to 12:00pm, and record review, held between 12:00pm to 1:00pm. Staff do not assist resident with obtaining therapy services: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that the licensee has failed to assist Resident 1 (R1) with obtaining physical therapy (PT) for their legs. According to the administrator, PT was never ordered by R1's primary physician or R1's hospice services. Interview with R1 was made, and R1 deny that they require PT. Interview with the hospice agency also do not corroborate with the alegation of R1 not gettingCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240125085213

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 10 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
10
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(747) 300-2232
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Emerald Senior Care,inc.? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.