Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Reesejoy Care Home II
Small home·Licensed for 6·Granada Hills, California
- Care approvals on fileHospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,450 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedApril 26, 2024 · not a current opening
- Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
- Last state visitOctober 20, 2025CDSS inspection record
- Licence holderRvr CorporationSince 2019 · 4 licensed homes
Reesejoy Care Home II is a small care home in Granada Hills — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care and dementia care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Reesejoy Care Home II
Is Reesejoy Care Home II licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Reesejoy Care Home II licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Reesejoy Care Home II been cited?
2 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 16 state visits over the same years.
Is Reesejoy Care Home II still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Reesejoy Care Home II cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes within 4 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Reesejoy Care Home II take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Rvr Corporation, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Rvr Corporation — at least 4 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Northridge Hospital Medical Center is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Reesejoy Care Home II keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Reesejoy Care Home II license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “REESEJOY CARE HOME II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609853. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Rvr Corporation, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 16 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 16 state visits in that period.
- 5 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 20, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- BedriddenApproved by the state
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,650–$5,500
From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,450a month
Likely $3,650–$5,700
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,650–$5,500
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes within 4 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,700
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,800
- $6,450
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes within 4 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
13 homes like this within 4 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,200–$5,900.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Alaga HomesNorthridge · 1.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Alalik Care HomeGranada Hills · 2.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Balboa Senior LivingGranada Hills · 2.1 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Aurora Home for SeniorsGranada Hills · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 2.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of Sunshine PlusNorthridge · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity of Granada HillsGranada Hills · 2.9 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- A Caring Touch Board and CareChatsworth · 3.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Agape Senior ResidenceChatsworth · 3.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- A Paradise in the ValleyNorthridge · 3.5 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Lily of the ValleyNorthridge · 3.5 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 3.6 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 4.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 17544 San Jose St, Granada Hills, CA 91344Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 15 documents for this home, and its records count 16 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 20, 2025.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 16
- Most recent visit
- October 20, 2025
- Occupied · April 26, 2024 visit
- 5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 8 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 27, 2021 to April 26, 2024. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 8 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations2typical 0
- Type B citations3typical 0
- Substantiated allegations5typical 0
- Total complaints5typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 15 documents
Oct 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPAs met with staff, Cynthia Manala and Ferdinand Punsalang. They were both advised of the visit. At approximately 10:30am, with the assistance of staff, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. There is a carbon monoxide detector installed by the kitchen that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased 10/05/25. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Bedrooms: There were six (6) bedrooms of which five (5) designated for residents' use, and one (1) room for staff. Three of the bedrooms (rooms #3, #4, #5) are private. Rooms #1 and #2 are shared. Rooms occupied by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are four (4) bathrooms. Three (3) are designated for residents' use and one is for staff. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was between at 108 to 112 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning supplies are being stored in the hallway bathroom. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The living room has sufficient seating with a coffee table and television. Thers is no fireplace. The dining table is large enough to seat up to six (6) residents. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Floors and furniture were clean and maintained. Hallways and passageways were clear of any obstruction. Garage: Garage is attached to the home. Laundry area is in the garage, which is also used as storage and break room for staff. Garage is locked at all times. No resident access. Laundry Area: Laundry area is in the garage. Cleaning supplies and detergents maintained in the garage, which was kept locked during the inspection. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. The outdoor area was free of hazards. There is outdoor furniture appropriate for resident's use. There is no swimming pool or any other bodies of water. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications are kept locked in a kitchen cabinet. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025
Dec 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPAs met with the administrator, Roberto Ramirez, and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 11:45am, with the assistance of the administrator, LPAs took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. There is a carbon monoxide detector installed by the kitchen that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased 10/07/24. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were six (6) bedrooms of which five (5) designated for residents' use, and one (1) room for staff. Three of the bedrooms (rooms #3, #4, #5) are private. Rooms #1 and #2 are shared. Rooms occupied by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are four (4) bathrooms. Three (3) are designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was between at 105 to 109 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning supplies are being stored in the hallway bathroom. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The living room has a couch, two recliners, television and coffee table. No fireplace. The dining room has a table large enough to seat up to six (6) residents. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Floors and furniture were clean and maintained. Hallways and passageways were clear of any obstruction. Garage: Garage is attached to the home. It is locked and only used as storage. No resident access. Laundry Area: Laundry area is in the garage. Cleaning supplies and detergents maintained in the garage, which was kept locked during the inspection. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area and detergents are located in the garage which is kept locked and inaccessible. The garage is also used as storage area, and staff break room. . Resident Files: Resident files are kept in a cabinet in the living room. LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: Staff records are kept in a cabinet in the living room. LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications are kept locked in a kitchen cabinet. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2024
Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Administrator exposed himself to a resident Administrator offered unprescribed medication
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs requested copies of LIC 500 and Staff roster. At 1:45 PM LPAs conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Administrator exposed himself to a resident It was alleged that Administrator has exposed himself to R1. Administrator denied the allegation. Interviews with 4out of 5 residents denied the allegation. Interviews with 2 out of 2 staff members denied the allegation. Administrator stated that such behavior is not tolerated by himself or anyother staff. Furthermore, there were no witnesses that were identified to corroborate with the allegation. Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. (Continue on 9099C) Unsubstantiated Allegation: Administrator offered unprescribed medication. It was alleged that Administrator had offered R1 viagra on several occasions. Administrator denied the allegation. Interview with 4 out of 5 residents denied the allegation, adding they've never been administered medication that wasn't prescribed. Interview with Administrator revealed that although administrator uses viagra for their own medical condition, they haven't offered any unprescribed medication to R1 and or any of the other residents. Administrator explained the severity of offering unpresecribed medication to any of the residents. Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 31-AS-20210519164840
Apr 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
In conjunction to the complaint number 31-AS-20210519164840 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Michael Cava conducted a case management- Deficiencies visit. During the complaint investigation, LPAs conducted medication and Medication Records review for proper documentation for three (3) out 5 residents. LPAs could not complete an accurate medication count due to incomplete medication forms. LPAs also observed insufficient food, within for a total of 5 residents in care. On 04/11/2024 Interviews with 2 out of 5 residents revealed that there's no variety of food and that it's only based on Filipino cuisine. LPA Agban had issued Advisory Notes - Technical Assistance regarding food variety. LPA Agban had advised Administrator that meals shall consist an appropriate variety of foods. On today's visit interviews with 3 out 5 residents confirmed that staff don't offer variety of food. Exit Interview Conducted. Deficiencies Cited. Report Issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 85076(d)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 4, 2024
85076 Food Service (d) The licensee shall meet the following food supply and storage requirements: (1) Supplies of staple nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and fresh perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premise. This requirement is not met as evidence Based on teams observations, insufficient food, within the regulation was observed for a total of five residents in care. This poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024
Plan of correction: The licensee shall purchase sufficient food, a copy of receipt and photo documentation of sufficient food shall be submitted by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 27, 2024
Incidential Medical and Dental Care. The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on medications review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as the LPAs could not complete an accurate medication count, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024
Plan of correction: Within 24 hours, The licensee shall review 87465(a)(5) and submit a written memo of understanding to LPA by the POC date. The licensee will conducted training to address this section and submit proof of training to LPA by May 10, 2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 87555(b)(5) · Plan of correction due date: May 3, 2024
87555 GENERAL FOOD SERVICE REQUIREMENTS (b) (5) Meals shall consist of an appropriate variety of foods and shall be planned with consideration for cultural and religious background and food habits of residents. This requirement is not met as evidence Based on interviews, 3 out 5 residents confirmed that staff don't offer variety of food. This poses a potenital health, safety, or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will make new weekly menus to insure that there is a variety of food being served. Administrator will submit copies of menu to LPA by the POC date.
Apr 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility food supply is insufficient Facility is not regularly cleaned by staff
Lincensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived at the facility and was granted access by staff. Administrator arrived shortly after and LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Facility food supply is insufficient It was alleged that there was not enough food in the facility. During the physical plant tour, LPA observed sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. LPA interviewed 2 residents, 2 staff members and the Administrator. Interview with the Administrator revealed that food has never been an issue at the facility. Administrator stated that staff are providing generous food portions. Administrator confirmed that all residents eat 3 meals a day and have snacks in between meals. (Continue on 9099C) Unsubstantiated Interview with the 2 residents out of 5 revealed that food supply is sufficient, however, it has no variety food. Based on interviews and observation, this allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Facility is not regularly cleaned by staff It was alleged that the facility was not clean and facility toilet is broken. During the physical plant, LPA observed the facility to be clean. LPA inspected facility bathrooms and they were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Interviewed 2 residents out of 5 revealed that staff are regularly clean the facility. Based on interviews and observations, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted a copy of this report signed and deliveredthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20210519164840
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair. Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Ray Reyes and Dennis Montales, and advised them of the complaint. The administrator was notified over the telephone. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, a record review, and a physical plant inspection to insure the health and safety of the residents. Facility is in direpair/staff do not respond to resident's request in a timely manner: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that in the evening of, on or around 02/13/24, facility residents reported a smell of gas. Staff was notified, but informed resident that it will be addressed the next day. Late that night, into the early morning of 02/14/24, Resident 1 (R1) reported the smell of gas getting worse. Call for staff assistance was made, but there was a delay in staff response. Emergency responders (911) called, and the Fire Department responded to a gas leak. As a result of staff's late response, R1 experienced a headache, itchy throat and nose irritation. Prior to the investigation, LPA made contact with the Los Substantiated Angeles Fire Department (LAFD), Fire Prevention and Public Safety Bureau, who confirmed response to facility address was made for leaking natural gas on 02/14/24, between the hours of 2-3am. Interviews made at facility with staff and residents corroborated with the allegations. Per administrator, and staff, the advise made by LAFD, to replace the stove, has been made on 02/19/24, and a technician came out to inspect and service the leak on 02/14/24. Pictures of invoices for the purchase and service obtained. Based on the information obtained, the allegations of Facility is in disrepair and staff did not respond to resident's request in a timely manner is Substantiated. Citations issued on the 9099D. administered as prescribed when assessed at their medical appointment. Interview with the administrator confirmed that R1 wasn't administered Bumex/Bumetanide from February 14 to February 17 because it was ordered by their physician to hold prior to R1's dialysis scheduled for that week. In regards to R1's insulin, per administrator and staff, R1 is able to check their own blood sugar and inject their insulin on their own, with staff stand by only for supervision. Interviews with R1 confirms that Bumex was placed on hold per doctor's orders. R1 also confirmed that they are able to administer their own insulin, and check their blood sugar. R1 further stated that their medications is given to them as prescribed by their physician. R1 had no complaints with not getting assistance with their medications, as they confirmed with the LPA during their interview, that they get it as prescribed. LPA also interviewed the other four (4) residents, who expressed no complaints of not getting their medications as prescribed, or staff not being able to meet their needs. Based on the information obtained, there wasn't enough evidence to corroborate the allegations of Staff not administering resident their medications as prescribed and Staff not having the competency to meet the resident's needs. Therefore, the allegations is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff member is unable to communicate with resident due to language barrier: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that facility has new staff. Two were reported to not hearing well, and one does not speak English. No names were identified to the allegation. Interviews with two (2) of two staff, that were present during the investigation, deny the allegation. Both staff stated they haven't gotten any complaints or concerns from the residents about not being able to communicate with them. Interviews with five (5) of five residents do not corroborate with the allegation. Residents do admit staff speaks another language, but are still able to communicate with them in English. During LPA's interviews with staff, it was confirmed that staff does have an accent, and speak another language, but LPA was still able to communicate with them and understand their English. Based on the information obtained there was insufficient evidence to prove staff is unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier. Therefore, the allegations is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240216115813
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 22, 2024
Maintenance and Operation: The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by Although arrangements were made tohave a technician address the smell of gas, and licensee purchased a new stove, per LAFD recommendations, efforts should have already been made to prevent the smell of gas from worsening, and affecting a resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024
Plan of correction: (continued).. This posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care. Licensee did arrange for a technician to check out the stove, burner and gas leak on 02/14/24, and eventually replaced the old stove, purchasing a new stove on 02/19/24, per LAFD recommendation. Copies of these invoices obtained during the day of the investigation. No further corrections needed at this time.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 29, 2024
Personnel Requirements - General: Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Information received confirming that there was a staff delay in a response to a resident's need when the smell of gas was worsening in the early morning of 02/14/24, resulting in R1 to experieince headache, itchy throat and nose irritation. This posed a potential health and safety risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024
Plan of correction: Although arrangements were made to address the smell of gas, efforts were not made to assist R1 immediately the morning of 02/14/14. As POC, licensee will have staff review this section of the regulations, and self-certify that they have read and understood this section of the regulations. POC is due to the licensing agency by 02/29/24.
Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is not following resident's dietary plan. Staff is withholding resident's medication. Staff is not providing utensils when serving meals to a resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Carmelita Aliga, and advised her of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews, a review of facility records, a review of the facility food service and inspection of the physical plant. Staff is not following resient's dietary plan: In regards to the allegation, it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) requires a special diet, but staff is using too much salt on R1's food and serving food that R1 cannot have. Interviews with staff and residents made at approximately 9:15am to 10:30am. Interviews with staff deny the allegation. Interviews with two of two residents also do not corroborate with the allegation. Interview with R1 reveal that they have a special meal, prepared and delivered to them weekly from Project Angel Food. These meals consists of Unsubstantiated either chicken, turkey or shredded pork, vegetables, green beans or peas. Meals are specifically ordered by R1 or their family member, and delivered to the facility every Monday, that is good for the week. Also, alternate meals are prepared for R1, but denies steak or food with high sodium is ever served to them. At approximately 10:40am to 11:40am, a review of facility records were made. Record review reveal that R1 does require a low sodium and diabetic diet, which according to staff, they follow. At approximately 12pm, staff demonstrated to the LPA a meal (lunch) served to R1, and a list of dietary restrictions to R1, that is posted in the kitchen. A copy of this list of restrictions obtained, and a picture of the meal taken. Based on the information provided during the day's visit, there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1's dietary plan is not being followed. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff is withholding resident's medication: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that staff has withheld R1's water pill for an entire week. No dates specified when this incident occurred. Interview with a third party could not confirm or specify any dates if this medication was not given as prescribed. Interview with R1 could not confirm the time and day of when their medicine wasn't given to them as prescribed. LPA reviewed R1's medication records for October and November 2023, and did not observe any discrepancies. Copies of these records were obtained. Interviews with two of two residents deny the allegation, stating they've been getting their medications as prescribed. No complaints or concerns raised by these residents. Based on the information obtained there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1's medications were withheld. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff is not providing utensils when serving meals to a resident in care: In regards to the allegation it was alleged that R1 was served meals without utensils. Interviews with staff deny the allegation. Interview with R1 revealed that this had occurred once as far that they can recall, but couldn't recall when, and has not happened since. Interviews with two of two residents also deny the allegation. These residents stated they are provided and satisfied with a complete meal, and confirm utensils are included when meals are served. At approximately 12:00pm, LPA inspected the food service and observed utensils provided on the trays when meals were being served for the day. A picture was taken. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove utensils not provided when meals are served to the residents. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231121123001
Oct 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Christopher Alemoh and Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPAs met with the administrator, Roberto Ramirez and staff, Mellie Aliga and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 9:00am, with the assistance of staff, LPAs took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. There is a carbon monoxide detector installed by the kitchen that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased 09/28/22. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were six (6) bedrooms of which five (5) designated for residents' use, and one (1) room for staff. Three of the bedrooms (rooms #3, #4, #5) are private. Rooms #1 and #2 are shared. Rooms occupied by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Rooms #2 and #3 are vacant. Bathrooms: There are four (4) bathrooms. Three (3) are designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was between at 115 to 116 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning supplies are being stored in the hallway bathroom. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area and detergents are located in the garage which is kept locked and inaccessible. The garage is also used as storage area, and staff break room. . Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were review for proper documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Rvr Corporation, licensed since 2019, operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Reesejoy Care Home IV · West Hills
- Petit Oasis · Camarillo
- Reesejoy Care Home III · Port Hueneme
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Emerald Senior Care
Granada Hills · Small home · 0.1 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Andrew's Boarding Care
Granada Hills · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$4,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Haven Homes
Granada Hills · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$4,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Devonshire Elderly Care
Northridge · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate
The Gardens at Northridge
Northridge · Large community · 0.3 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Rose Senior Care, Inc. #2
Northridge · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate