Palm Vista Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Palmdale, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610286, licensed for 115 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 25, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Palm Vista Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 115 residents · Palmdale, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197610286, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3850 West Rancho Vista Blvd · Palmdale, Los Angeles County
Phone
(661) 202-3999
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 115 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 115 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. SPRINKLER AND ALARM SYSTEM VERIFIED, NO VIOLATIONS YN AREAS INSPECTED. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWENTY (20) HOSPICE RESIDENTS. NEW MGT CO NORTHSTAR SNR LVG MGT LLC EFFECTIVE 4/22/26.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 25, 2025.

Most recent state visit
February 24, 2026
Occupancy at the March 26, 2025 visit
83 of 115 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 12, 2022 to March 26, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff charged resident for services not rendered Staff did not ensure that resident's incontinence care needs were met

On 3/26/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth met with the Administrator, Stuart Montalvo. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to review documentation, conduct interviews and deliver the findings. LPA Spaeth toured the facility at 10:00 am until 10:20 am. LPA interviewed nine (9) out of eighty-three residents at 10:45 am until 11:30 am. LPA also interviewed nine (9) out of forty-five staff members at 11:30 am until 3:00 pm. LPA reviewed residents’ records at 3:00 pm until 3:30 pm. LPA received copies of the Admissions Agreement, End of Shift Report, Billing Statement, Resident Move Out Form, Physician’s Report (LIC 602), Resident Assessment, and Needs and Services Plan. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250310120255
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not allowing resident to leave the facility

On 10/02/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Stuart Montalvo. LPA Spaeth explained the purpose of this visit is to interview staff, a resident and gather information regarding the complaint allegation(s). LPA Spaeth interviewed two staff members at 10:40 am until 11:00 am. LPA reviewed the residents' files at 12:15 until 12:45 pm. LPA received copies of the resident's documentation. LPA interviewed a resident at 12:30 pm until 1:00 pm. LPA Spaeth also toured the facility at 2:00 pm until 2:20 pm. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not allowing resident to leave the facility. It’s alleged a resident (R1) had a friend who requested to take R1 on 9/11/2024 to a local location for a walk; however, the facility staff called R1’s POA. The POA stated R1 could not accompany the friend on an outing. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240925121504
Jul 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident Staff is retaliating against a resident Staff did not follow a licensed physician orders Staff mishandled a resident's medications Staff did not afford a resident privacy while in care Staff unlawfully confiscated a resident's personal belongings Staff overcharged a resident for a service not received

On 4/19/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth was met by Jeisy Pinoargote, Resident Care Director. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to conduct interviews and present findings. LPA conducted a physical tour at 9:45am to 10:10 am. The investigation consisted of the following: On 02/02/2024, LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation. LPA reviewed resident files and interviewed two staff members. LPA received copies of the documentation. On 4/18/2024, LPA Spaeth reviewed resident documents, interviewed six residents. During today’s visit, LPA interviewed five (5) out of twenty-six (26) staff members. Regarding the allegation: staff unlawfully evicted a resident and Staff is retaliating against a resident. It’s being alleged that a 60-day eviction notice was given to R1 in retaliation of R1 not paying for services provided to R1. R1 was not athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240201160406
Apr 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not accurately assess resident's needs. Facility staff did not communicate with resident's family. Facility staff did not ensure that resident's room was free of clutter in the walkways. Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. Facility staff did not provide needed care and assistance to resident. Facility staff did not ensure that resident had hot water for showers Facility staff did not ensure that resident received medical attention while in care. Facility staff did not ensure that resident was being fed while in care.

On 4/18/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth was met by Jeisy Pinoargote, Resident Care Director. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to conduct interviews and present findings. LPA conducted a physical tour at 9:45am to 10:10 am. The investigation consisted of the following: on 05/04/2023, LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation. LPA reviewed resident files and interviewed seven residents. LPA received copies of the documentation. On 4/18/2024, LPA Spaeth reviewed resident documents at 10:30 am until 11:30 am. LPA interviewed residents and received copies of resident’s documents. The investigation revealed the following regarding the allegation: Facility staff did not accurately assess resident’s needs. It’s being alleged that facility staff did not accurately assess the care a resident (R1) cont'd 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230502121813
Apr 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately forced resident into memory care

On 3/25/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melissa Spaeth and Licensing Program Manager (LPM), Troy Agard conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth and LPM Agard were met by Stuart Montalvo, Administrator. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to gather additional information, conduct interviews and deliver the findings for this complaint. LPA conducted a physical tour at 9:45am to 10:10am. The investigation consisted of the following: on 07/06/2023, LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation. LPA toured the facility and reviewed files. On 04/18/2024, LPA Spaeth and LPM Agard conducted interviews and reviewed additional records. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230630143812
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility not meeting dietary needs of residents Facility is not providing a variety of food and quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents. Facility is not providing various activities

This is an amended copy of the report previously issued on 12/05/2022 and 01/04/2023. This report supersedes reports previously issued. The findings for this complaint have been updated. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation for the allegation(s) listed above and met with Isabel Cortes, Business Officer Manager. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/05/2022, LPA Spaeth conducted a 10-day visit, reviewed residents’ Dietary Communication Notifications and reviewed facility’s menu. LPA Spaeth received copies of the documents during the visit. On 01/04/2023, LPA interviewed 7 residents out of 41 and 5 out of 14 staff members. Regarding the allegation: Facility not meeting dietary needs of residents. It’s being alleged that resident dietary needs are not met and that alternative meals are not provided. LPA interviewed (S3) who stated when a resident moves into the facility, Dietary Communication Notificationthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023 · control 31-AS-20221129080606
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file18typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025330202445020234412022440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (661) 202-3999

Is Palm Vista Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Palm Vista Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Palmdale (Los Angeles County): California license #197610286, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 115 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 25, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Palm Vista Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Palm Vista Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 115 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. SPRINKLER AND ALARM SYSTEM VERIFIED, NO VIOLATIONS YN AREAS INSPECTED. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWENTY (20) HOSPICE RESIDENTS. NEW MGT CO NORTHSTAR SNR LVG MGT LLC EFFECTIVE 4/22/26.

How much does Palm Vista Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Palm Vista Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Palm Vista Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Palm Vista Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

83 of 115 beds occupied (72%) when the state visited on March 26, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Palm Vista Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2022 for Palm Vista Senior Living; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 26, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff charged resident for services not rendered Staff did not ensure that resident's incontinence care needs were met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 3/26/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth met with the Administrator, Stuart Montalvo. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to review documentation, conduct interviews and deliver the findings. LPA Spaeth toured the facility at 10:00 am until 10:20 am. LPA interviewed nine (9) out of eighty-three residents at 10:45 am until 11:30 am. LPA also interviewed nine (9) out of forty-five staff members at 11:30 am until 3:00 pm. LPA reviewed residents’ records at 3:00 pm until 3:30 pm. LPA received copies of the Admissions Agreement, End of Shift Report, Billing Statement, Resident Move Out Form, Physician’s Report (LIC 602), Resident Assessment, and Needs and Services Plan. Continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250310120255

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not allowing resident to leave the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/02/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Stuart Montalvo. LPA Spaeth explained the purpose of this visit is to interview staff, a resident and gather information regarding the complaint allegation(s). LPA Spaeth interviewed two staff members at 10:40 am until 11:00 am. LPA reviewed the residents' files at 12:15 until 12:45 pm. LPA received copies of the resident's documentation. LPA interviewed a resident at 12:30 pm until 1:00 pm. LPA Spaeth also toured the facility at 2:00 pm until 2:20 pm. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not allowing resident to leave the facility. It’s alleged a resident (R1) had a friend who requested to take R1 on 9/11/2024 to a local location for a walk; however, the facility staff called R1’s POA. The POA stated R1 could not accompany the friend on an outing. Continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240925121504
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff unlawfully evicted a resident Staff is retaliating against a resident Staff did not follow a licensed physician orders Staff mishandled a resident's medications Staff did not afford a resident privacy while in care Staff unlawfully confiscated a resident's personal belongings Staff overcharged a resident for a service not received
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 4/19/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth was met by Jeisy Pinoargote, Resident Care Director. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to conduct interviews and present findings. LPA conducted a physical tour at 9:45am to 10:10 am. The investigation consisted of the following: On 02/02/2024, LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation. LPA reviewed resident files and interviewed two staff members. LPA received copies of the documentation. On 4/18/2024, LPA Spaeth reviewed resident documents, interviewed six residents. During today’s visit, LPA interviewed five (5) out of twenty-six (26) staff members. Regarding the allegation: staff unlawfully evicted a resident and Staff is retaliating against a resident. It’s being alleged that a 60-day eviction notice was given to R1 in retaliation of R1 not paying for services provided to R1. R1 was not aCDSS inspection report, April 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240201160406
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not accurately assess resident's needs. Facility staff did not communicate with resident's family. Facility staff did not ensure that resident's room was free of clutter in the walkways. Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. Facility staff did not provide needed care and assistance to resident. Facility staff did not ensure that resident had hot water for showers Facility staff did not ensure that resident received medical attention while in care. Facility staff did not ensure that resident was being fed while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 4/18/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth was met by Jeisy Pinoargote, Resident Care Director. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to conduct interviews and present findings. LPA conducted a physical tour at 9:45am to 10:10 am. The investigation consisted of the following: on 05/04/2023, LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation. LPA reviewed resident files and interviewed seven residents. LPA received copies of the documentation. On 4/18/2024, LPA Spaeth reviewed resident documents at 10:30 am until 11:30 am. LPA interviewed residents and received copies of resident’s documents. The investigation revealed the following regarding the allegation: Facility staff did not accurately assess resident’s needs. It’s being alleged that facility staff did not accurately assess the care a resident (R1) cont'd 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230502121813
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff inappropriately forced resident into memory care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 3/25/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melissa Spaeth and Licensing Program Manager (LPM), Troy Agard conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth and LPM Agard were met by Stuart Montalvo, Administrator. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to gather additional information, conduct interviews and deliver the findings for this complaint. LPA conducted a physical tour at 9:45am to 10:10am. The investigation consisted of the following: on 07/06/2023, LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation. LPA toured the facility and reviewed files. On 04/18/2024, LPA Spaeth and LPM Agard conducted interviews and reviewed additional records. Continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 18, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230630143812

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not meeting dietary needs of residents Facility is not providing a variety of food and quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents. Facility is not providing various activities
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This is an amended copy of the report previously issued on 12/05/2022 and 01/04/2023. This report supersedes reports previously issued. The findings for this complaint have been updated. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation for the allegation(s) listed above and met with Isabel Cortes, Business Officer Manager. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/05/2022, LPA Spaeth conducted a 10-day visit, reviewed residents’ Dietary Communication Notifications and reviewed facility’s menu. LPA Spaeth received copies of the documents during the visit. On 01/04/2023, LPA interviewed 7 residents out of 41 and 5 out of 14 staff members. Regarding the allegation: Facility not meeting dietary needs of residents. It’s being alleged that resident dietary needs are not met and that alternative meals are not provided. LPA interviewed (S3) who stated when a resident moves into the facility, Dietary Communication NotificationCDSS inspection report, October 12, 2023 · control 31-AS-20221129080606
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not meeting dietary needs of residents Facility is not providing a variety of food and quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
LPA conducted an unannounced visit and was greeted by Administrator. LPA observed receptionist was wearing a mask and all staff throughout the facility were wearing masks. LPA stated the purpose of the visit was to investigate the allegations: Facility not meeting dietary needs of residents; Facility is not providing a variety of food and quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents; and Facility is not providing various activities. LPA toured the facility from 10:00 am until 10:20 am. LPA did not observe any health or safety issues. LPA interviewed staff and residents at 12:30 pm until 4:00 pm and reviewed residents’ records at 4:00 pm until 5:00 pm. Facility Not Meeting Dietary Needs of Residents - LPA interviewed four residents who have special dietary needs. All four residents stated within the last two months residents were served several meals that did not meet the dietary requirements. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 4, 2023 · control 31-AS-20221129080606

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(661) 202-3999
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Palm Vista Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.