Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living

Large community·Licensed for 131·Montrose, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #197609594
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,300 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 131Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit70 of 131 beds occupiedMay 1, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 18, 2026CDSS inspection record

Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living is a large care community in Montrose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 131 residents since 2019.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living

Is Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living licensed for?

131 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 16 state visits over the same years.

Is Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living cost?

$4,300 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 120 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,088 to $5,973 a month, and the middle figure is $4,183 (n = 120 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ec Opco Ca Partner IV LLC; Sh1 Shoreline Mgmt, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

USC Verdugo Hills Hospital is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SPARR HEIGHTS ESTATES SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197609594. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 131 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ec Opco Ca Partner IV LLC; Sh1 Shoreline Mgmt, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 16 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 16 state visits in that period.
  • 7 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 131 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 20 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 131 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 20 ROOMS ON THE 1ST FLOOR FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 10. NEW MANAGMENT COMPANY, SH1 SHORELINE MGMT, LLC, EFFECTIVE 6/6/2022.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

2 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Level of medication serviceReminders only

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pharmacy services on site

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • Training topics namedStaff trained in memory careWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Secured building entry

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,300a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,300a month

Likely $4,300–$4,900

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,300this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$4,900
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,400
$6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.

22 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,750–$6,150.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 22 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2640 Honolulu Ave, Montrose, CA 91020Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 16 documents for this home, and its records count 16 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 28, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
16
Most recent visit
August 18, 2026
Occupied · May 1, 2025 visit
70 of 131 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 12 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 7, 2022 to May 1, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 12 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 2
  • Total complaints7typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202533020243302022791

The last 36 months — 7 of 16 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan initially met with the receptionist Bertha Barbes who called the Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. Ms. Gotto stated that the files were locked so she would be at the facility. Ms. Gotto arrived at around 11:16 AM. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at around 10:41 AM with the Marketing Director and eventually the Executive Director and the following was noted: The facility is fire cleared for one hundred twenty (120) non-ambulatory of which twenty (20) may be bedridden. The facility is currently occupying a total of seventy-five (75) residents, ten (10) of which are in hospice care. There is only one main entrance being utilized at the facility with sign-in sheets. Each residents' room has a full bathroom. LPA inspected random rooms in Memory Care and Assisted Living both first and second floor. Room 3E of Memory Care has toxins under the sink and Room 7E of Memory Care has no hot water on its sink. All rooms were observed to be adequately furnished with appropriate lighting system and enough clean linen available. Hallways are well lit. Residents have enough personal hygiene products provided by the licensee. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. The hot water temperature was measured at a range of 108.9°F to 118.9°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. The facility has outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents and visitors. The facility does not have a swimming pool/body of water. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins were observed to be locked in the parking area. (continued on LIC 809-C) (continued from 809) Kitchen is sufficiently stocked with at least two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The facility has two (2) elevators, both of which are working properly. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 75°F. The facility's smoke alarms are hard-wired, interconnected with a pull system. The facility is equipped with sprinkler system but the facility has been currently on fire watch since September 2025, and per the Executive Director, they are in the process of updating their fire alarm and pull system. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and were last serviced on 02/11/26. Fire Drill was last conducted on 03/26/26. The living, dining and activity rooms are neat and clean. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 73°F but each resident has their own thermostat and can control the temperature in their rooms. The smoke alarms are hardwired, interconnected and centralized. Each room has a carbon monoxide detector installed. A signal is dispatched to the Los Angeles Fire Department automatically and the system is tested monthly. Laundry area is located in the basement area and is inaccessible to residents. Emergency drinking waters are also located in the basement/parking area. Medications were observed to be locked in the medication carts and inaccessible to residents. There were two (2) complete first aid kits in the medication room and medication carts. LPA observed medication carts locked and inaccessible to residents. Facility maintains a complete first aid kit. At 2:20 PM, LPA reviewed records of six (6) random residents and six (6) staff. Residents' records are observed to be current and updated. Staff #1 (S1) did not have a First Aid certificate on file. Citation issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents in care. Staff spoke inappropriately while in front of resident.

This is an addendum to the Licensing report previously issued on 04/15/2024. Licensing program Analyst (LPA) Leizl DeLaCerra conducted announced subsequent visit to the facility on 05/01/25 to deliver the findings. LPA met the administrator and explained the purpose of the visit Allegation: Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents in care. It was alleged that due to lack of supervision, resident #1 (R1) spent the night in the flooded room on 4/08/2024 and staff did not check on R1 until next morning”. To investigate this allegation. LPA Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an initial visit and delivered findings on 4/15/2024. During LPA de la Cerra's subsequent visit, 0n 4/24/2025. LPA conducted physical plant tour, conducted record reviews and staff interviews between 10:30am to 12:00pm and 1:30pm to 3:00pm, resident interviews were conducted between 12:30pm to 1:30pm. LPA obtained the staff roster, resident list, and gathered additional documents pertaining to the investigation. Continue to LIC9099C Unsubstantiated LPA de la Cerra’s interviews with staff #2 (S2) at 11:55am revealed that R1’s care and supervision was increased due to showing some signs of decline, confusion and bladder retention problems, S1 then instructed staff members to do hourly routine check for R1. Interviews with staff #3 (S3) at 3:05pm and phone interview with staff #4 (S4) on 4/30/25 who both were assigned on night shift (NOC) duty during April 2024 revealed that around the beginning of April, staff members were instructed to increase the routine check on R1 to every hour. Staff S3 and S4 did check in on R1 routinely every hour and the last check in would normally be at 6:00am when their shift would end. LPA de la Cerra’s interviews with staff members, staff #5 (S5) and staff #6 (S6) who were with the AM shift (starts at 6am) during April 2024 revealed that they checked in with R1 usually at 6:30am. and every hour thereafter. Interviews with caregivers, S3, S4, S5 and S6 revealed that although the check in with R1 was hourly but most of these check-ins with R1 would not be documented in the facility’s observation log. Caregivers are instructed that there is no need to document on the observation log if there are no changes observed with the residents or if they are just sleeping.. Interviews with residents reveal that they receive sufficient care and supervision from facility staff. Furthermore, interviews with staff # S2, S3 and S7 on 4/30/25, revealed that R1 did not like wearing incontinence underwear and the incident on 4/09/24 with the broken toilet could be due to R1 attempting to flush their incontinence underwear in the toilet which would cause the toilet to overflow and malfunction. Review of R1’s records reveal that due to R1’s change in health condition, R1’s individual service plan was modified, that facility staff will provide total assistance to R1 to ensure successful toileting. During LPA de la Cerra’s subsequent visit on 4/24/25, R1 was not available for interview, record review by LPA de la Cerra revealed the R1 no longer resides at Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living, R1’s Power of Attorney-POA moved R1 out of the facility on 3/18/2025. Based on inspection, observations, interviews and record reviews, there is insufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, the allegation remains Unsubstantiated. CONTINUE to LIC9099-C Allegation: Staff spoke inappropriately while in front of resident. It was alleged that while the reporting party was with R1 in R1’s room, and a female staff with hair dyed pink or purple, who is Filipino said to the reporting party that R1 is “coo coo”. To investigate this allegation. LPA Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an initial visit and delivered findings on 4/15/2024. During LPA de la Cerra's subsequent visit, 0n 4/24/2025. LPA conducted physical plant tour, conducted record reviews and staff interviews between 10:30am to 12:00pm and 1:30pm to 3:00pm, resident interviews were conducted between 12:30pm to 1:30pm. LPA obtained the staff roster, resident list, and gathered additional documents pertaining to the investigation. During LPA de la Cerra’s physical plant tour, LPA did not observe any staff member with hair dyed pink or purple, who is Filipino. LPA de la Cerra’s interviews with staff #1 (S1) at 11:00am and staff #2 (S2) at 11:55am on 4/24/25 revealed that the facility did not have a Filipino staff member with hair dyed pink or purple around April 2024. Interviews with residents reveal that they have never been spoken to inappropriately by any staff members. Additionally, residents interview also revealed that no staff member ever spoke inappropriately about them in front of their family member. During LPA de la Cerra’s subsequent visit on 4/24/25, R1 was not available for interview, record review by LPA de la Cerra revealed the R1 no longer resides at Sparr Heights Estates Senior Living, R1’s Power of Attorney-POA moved R1 out of the facility on 3/18/2025. Based on inspection, observations, interviews and record reviews, there is insufficient information to support this allegation. Therefore, the allegation remains Unsubstantiated. No health and safety hazards noted at the time of this visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 31-AS-20240410154700
Mar 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma met with the Executive Director, Denise Gotto, for a Required One (01) Year visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at around 10:00 AM and the following was noted: The facility is fire cleared for one hundred twenty (120) non-ambulatory of which twenty (20) may be bedridden. The facility is currently occupying sixty-eight (68) residents. There is a main entrance being utilized at the facility with sign-in sheets. Each residents' room has a full bathroom. LPA inspected seven (07) rooms at random and all rooms were observed to be adequately furnished with appropriate lighting system and enough clean linen available. Hallways are well lit. Residents have enough personal hygiene product provided by the licensee. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operations. The hot water temperature was measured at an average 109.6°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. The facility has outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents and visitors. The facility does not have a swimming pool/body of water. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are locked away. Kitchen is sufficiently stocked with at least two (02) days perishable and seven (07) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. (continued on LIC 809-C) The living and dining room are neat and clean. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 73°F but each resident has their own thermostat and can control the temperature in their rooms. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired, interconnected and centralized. A signal is dispatched to the Los Angeles Fire Department automatically and the system is tested monthly. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the facility, observed to be fully charged and last inspected 01/17/2025. LPA observed medication carts to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Facility maintains a complete first aid kit. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2025
Jan 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff sexually abused resident in care. Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies.

An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina to issue the findings of the above listed allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Executive Director, Bill Heady, and explained the reason for the visit. On 07/28/23, the Woodland Hills South Adult and Senior Care Regional Office received a complaint regarding the allegations, “Staff sexually abused resident in care” and “Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies”. The complaint was referred to Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch. The complaint was assigned to Investigator, Laarni Santiago. On 07/31/23, LPA Ruiz initiated the complaint. LPA conducted tour of the facility and obtained copies of pertinent information which include but not limited to R1’s Physician’s Report (dated on 11/01/21). Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated During todays visit, LPA Panushkina obtained copies of R1's Admission Agreement (dated on 12/22/21), Appraisal Needs and Services Plan (dated on 11/17/21) and Resident Abuse and Neglect Policy (effective date 11/01/2014) related to the complaint. This complaint investigation was conducted by Laarni Santiago, Investigator from Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch (IB). The investigation consisted of interviews, conducted between 09/07/23 to 10/26/23 with the Executive Director (ED), Health Services Director (HSD), Former Executive Director (FED), six (6) staff and attempt to interview four (4) memory care residents. Allegation: Staff sexually abused resident in care. The investigation findings revealed that R1 had been living at this facility since 12/28/2021 and resided in a Memory Care Unit. Also, during that time, S1 was working at this facility as a MedTech and it was alleged that R1 was routinely molested by S1 for a span of at least 3-6 months in 2022. Investigator conducted interviews with the Executive Director and Health Services Director and both parties could not provide any relevant information since they were not aware of any incidents between R1 and S1. Investigator also conducted an interview with S1, who denied the above allegation and advised that R1 “cried a lot” and S1 would only give a “hug” just to comfort R1. During the interview with S4, Investigator was informed that S4 and S5 witnessed S1 “kiss” R1. However, S5 refuted the claim and denied witnessing S1 commit any sexual conduct towards R1 or other residents. Moreover, S5 informed the Investigator that none of the residents or staff complained about S1. Both staff interviewed revealed inconsistent and conflicting information. Former Executive Director (FED) also informed the Investigator that no complaints from residents nor staff regarding S1’s inappropriate behavior was ever received. In addition, FED expressed that S1 was polite and reliable and voluntarily resigned to focus on school and become a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN). Furthermore, the Investigator conducted an interview with S6, who reported that he/she saw S1 inappropriately touched a resident. However, there were no other witnesses to corroborate the incident and S6 could not confirm that it was R1. Interviews with other two (2) staff did not indicate that they witnessed S1 touch or handle residents inappropriately and reported that S1 seemed to be a “genuine” and “caring” staff. Lastly, the Investigator attempted to conduct interviews with four (4) Memory Care residents, but they could not provide pertinent or relevant details. Based on interviews and information gathered during the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, it deemed Unsubstantiated, at this time. Continue on LIC9099-C Allegation: Staff did not report incident to the proper agencies. It was alleged that R1 was routinely molested by S1 for a span of at least 3-6 months in 2022 and upon discovering the situation, the Former Executive Director (FED) forced S1 to resign, but didn’t report S1 to the authorities. To investigate this allegation, on 10/12/23 the Investigator conducted an interview with the FED and was informed that this was the first time he/she heard about the sexual abuse allegation. FED also denied that any staff came forward about concerns involving S1 and R1; or that they witnessed S1 conduct any inappropriate behavior. In addition, FED informed the Investigator that R1’s responsible party was highly involved in R1’s care and visited R1 frequently. R1’s responsible party did not bring up any concerns about S1 or any staff. Moreover, FED dined that S1 was forced to resign due to a “very odd” allegation and informed the Investigator that S1 voluntarily left because S1 wanted to focus on school and become a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN). Thus, there was no reason for this information to be reported and or to be escalated to the authorities. Lastly, interview conducted on 10/24/23 with S1, confirmed that he/she resigned because the facility required staff to work longer hours, but S1 could not because of school. Therefore, based on interviews and information gathered during the investigation, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiency cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025 · control 31-AS-20230728111241
20243 state visits · 3 documents
May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following proper reporting requirement Resident care needs are not being met by facility staff

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Business Office Manager Helen Kirkorian and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:42 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:18 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that resident care needs are not being met by facility staff, it was alleged that Residents are complaining about quality of care and multiple issues with resident care needs. LPA's interview with six (6) residents on 03/13/24 between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM and another six (6) residents today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that twelve (12) out of twelve (12) residents or about 20% of current census stated that the staff are respectful and provide all the care that they need and the quality of care are to their satisfaction. None of the twelve (12) residents interviewed expressed any issue with care or staff at this time. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Staff are not following proper reporting requirement, it was alleged that two (2) residents were in altercation and the former Executive Director (ED) did not take the staff concern seriously and did not report to CCL. The reporting party (RP) did not provide any details of the alleged incident as to who, when and where it happened. The RP also did not provide any contact details, so no contact was made with the RP to get the details of the alleged incident that was not reported. LPA's record review today between at 1:00 PM to 1:38 PM revealed that the ED referred to on RP's report had left the facility sometime in June 2023. LPA's interview with a staff at 12:45 PM however, revealed that the only altercation happened during the time of the former ED between two (2) residents happened sometime in May of 2023. LPA's record review today between 1:00 PM to 1:38 PM revealed that the facility had submitted Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) on 05/22/23 regarding an altercation between two (2) residents happened on 05/21/23. The incident was also reported to the local law enforcement. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230308135842
Mar 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is unsafe for residents in care due to unsecured access ways Residents are not provided proper medication assistance

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Ray Comer conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with interim Administrator Tracy Waite as the current administrator is indisposed and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at around 9:40 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:10 AM, reviewed records between 10:30 AM to 11:40 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Facility is unsafe for residents in care due to unsecured access ways, it was alleged that there is an issue regarding residents' safety and elopement from unsecured access ways in Memory Care Unit. LPAs observation during today's visit revealed that the access ways in the Memory Care units are secured and all the delayed egress and all safety protocol are in place. LPAs' interview with the maintenance staff at 12:30 PM also revealed that there was never an issue with the access and ingress and egress on the Memory Care Unit and never in disrepair for the last one and half year since the maintenance staff was employed. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099-C) Regarding the allegation that residents are not provided proper medication assistance, it was alleged that there were Medication errors and late Medications pass at the facility. LPAs interviewed six (6) random residents or 10% of current census today between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM revealed that six (6) out of six (6) residents did not experience medication error nor late medication administration. Further interviews also revealed that six (6) out of six (6) residents did not witness or aware of any resident who had medication error or late medication pass. LPAs interview with two (2) Medication staff today between 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM also revealed that there was no medication error or medication late pass and/or reported for the last two (2) years that the medication staff were employed. Based on the information gathered during this visit the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230308135842

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Feb 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced Required 1 year inspection to the facility. LPA met with Helen Kirkorian, Business Office Manager and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. There is one main entrance being utilized at the facility. The facility consists of one main building. The Independent Living section of the facility is on the top floor and the Memory Care Unit is located on the bottom floor. The facility has a capacity for 131 residents. Currently 58 rooms are being occupied. Common areas were checked for cleanliness. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. The residents rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 78 degrees. The smoke detectors are hardwired and interconnected and observed to be operational. There are carbon monoxide detectors in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the facility and were last serviced in January of 2024. The bathrooms were checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed the appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature was measured at 120 degrees F. Medications-LPA observed medication carts in the nursing station to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There is one ( 01) complete first aid kit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was issued and signature obtained. No deficiencies were issued at this timethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Shared / companion rooms

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceGarden

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Wifi in resident rooms

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Cable or satellite TV

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Salon or barber

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itPet therapy

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Exercise or fitness programYoga/stretching

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Overnight guests

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County