Small home · Licensed for 6 · Woodland Hills
Hepzebah House
22230 Vanowen St, Woodland Hills, CA 91303Licensed since 2020
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN TO RESIDE IN BDRM# 1 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Hepzebah House: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,300a month to start
Likely $4,350–$6,550
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,300likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,300likely $4,350–$6,550
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,350–$6,700
- $5,300
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,100–$9,850
- $7,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $10,000
11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$5,650.
- Elite Retirement ResidenceWest Hills · 1.0 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Wholesome Life Senior LivingCanoga Park · 1.0 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- 4th Generation Senior LivingWest Hills · 1.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- My Home of AgingWoodland Hills · 2.1 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Topanga Gardens Residential Home CareCanoga Park · 2.2 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on its own website · shared room, starting rate · seen October 5, 2026
- Chateau Le Petite IIIWoodland Hills · 2.7 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Liebelove CareWoodland Hills · 2.7 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue Skies RanchTarzana · 3.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Lily of the ValleyNorthridge · 3.7 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Elegance Care ResortTarzana · 3.8 mi · Small home$10,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Agape Senior ResidenceChatsworth · 4.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
22230 Vanowen St, Woodland Hills, CA 91303Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- UCLA West Valley Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609871 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20263 state visits · 4 documents
May 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted a Case Management - Incident visit. LPA met with Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. On 05/26/26, the Department received a self-reported incident report stating that Resident #1 (R1) had left the facility on 05/24/26 and did not return. The incident was reported to police (copy of the the report is also obtained). During today's visit, LPA conducted a physical plant walk through, at approximately 12:35pm, to ensure that the facility is in compliance with rules and regulations under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. LPA did not observe any immediate health and safety issues during the visit. LPA conducted interview with the Administrator and attempted to contact R1's Power of Attorney. LPA also obtained copies of R1's facility records. Upon review of the physician's report dated 04/22/2026, the report states that R1 has dementia and is not able to leave the facility unassisted. Interview with the Administrator revealed that R1 lived at the above facility since 04/04/26 and was very happy with the place. The Administrator denied seeing changes in R1's behavior. Interview with S1 revealed that on a day of an incident, at approximately 8:00pm, R1 was smoking outside (backyard) and asked S1 to get pull-ups, so that R1 can change and get ready for sleep. LPA was informed that around 8:07pm S1 brought the pull-ups and did not observe R1 sitting outside. S1 looked around and went outside (to the front) and still did not observe R1. S1 immediately contacted the Administrator and the law enforcement regarding the incident. R1 is still missing and Administrator currently does not have any updated information on R1's whereabouts. LPA will conduct a follow up visit regarding this incident. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026
May 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in a soiled brief Staff did not provide first responder with resident's records Licensee did not ensure front egress is free from obstruction
At 10:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced visit in response to the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:35am, LPA requested residents and staff roster. At 10:40am, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Incontinence Plan of Care, Staff Training relevant to the investigation. At approximately 10:50am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. Between 10:55am – 12:00pm, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and two (2) out of four (4) residents, who were able to communicate. Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Staff left resident in a soiled brief It was alleged that the staff left R1 in a soiled brief. To investigate this allegation, LPA contacted the credible witness on 05/08/26, who confirmed that they responded to the facility (9-1-1 call) on 05/03/2026 at approximately 10:00am, and R1 had reportedly complained of stomachache, and when the credible witness assessed R1, they observed R1 was wearing a soiled incontinent brief. During today’s visit, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and was informed all residents are checked and assisted with toileting/incontinence care throughout the day and as needed. However, on the date of an incident, there was limited staff available at the facility during the time 911 arrived. Interview with the Administrator also revealed that staff are expected to provide timely assistance with toileting and incontinent care. However, the Administrator was unable to explain as to why on the day of an incident, R1 was not changed and proper care was not provided. Therefore, based on the credible witness observation and Administrator confirmation this allegation is Substantiated. Allegation: Staff did not provide first responder with resident's records It was alleged that on 05/03/2026 staff did not provide a first responder with R1’s records. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the credible witness and was informed that upon arrival (911 call) at the facility, staff #1 (S1) did not appear to know R1’s basic information and were unable to locate or access R1’s facility file. LPA was also informed that it took several minutes for the Administrator to arrive who was able to write down R1’s biographical information before R1 was transferred to the hospital. Interview with the Administrator revealed that S1 was newly hired and did not have access to resident records. During the interview, the Administrator acknowledged that staff should have been able to provide residents basic information and records in a timely manner. Therefore, based on credible witness observation and information gathered during today’s visit, this allegation is Substantiated. Continue on LIC9099-C Allegation: Licensee did not ensure front egress is free from obstruction It was alleged that the licensee did not ensure the front door was free from obstruction. To investigate this allegation, LPA contacted the credible witness on 05/08/26, who confirmed that when they responded to the facility (9-1-1 call) on 05/03/2026, it was difficult to exit the facility with R1 because there was furniture on the porch and a hose in the way. During today’s visit (upon arrival), LPA observed one (1) chair and one (1) table on the left side of the house (with no obstruction). However, LPA also observed the hose in the way by the ramp. Interview with the Administrator revealed that they placed the chair and the table outside in case residents have family/friends visiting they can sit outside and have privacy. Administrator also acknowledged that the walkway should remain clear and accessible at all times and that items such as outdoor furniture and hoses should not block the front entry, walkway or emergency exits pathway. The Administrator also acknowledge that on 05/03/26 the ramp was an obstructed by the hose and further stated that staff are expected to monitor the facility exterior and remove any items that may interfere with safe passage. Therefore, based on credible witness and LPA observation and information gathered during today’s visit, this allegation is Substantiated. Deficiencies issued during today's visit. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights explained and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260505111640
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 19, 2026
Basic Services: (a) The services... shall be conducted so as to continue and promote, to the extent possible, independence and self-direction for all persons accepted for care... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the credible witnesses visit conducted on 05/03/26, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not changing R1's soiled incontinence brief, which posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026
Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to create an Incontinent Plan of Care and provide in-service training to all current and future staff members. Proof of training will be submitted to LPA by POC date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 19, 2026
Incidental Medical...: Emergency care requirements shall include the following: (1) The name, address, telephone number of each resident's physician... shall be readily available to... and facility staff. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on credible witnesses visit conducted on 05/03/26, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by failing to provide R1's emergency record during 911 visit. This poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to create an emergency card for residents that will be used/provided to first responders. Also in-service training will be conducted with all staff and copies will be submitted to LPA by POC date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: May 19, 2026
Personal Accommodations and Services: (d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs observation, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that the outside (front) hose is away from the ramp and properly placed/rolled on a hook. This poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026
Plan of correction: During today's visit the Administrator removed the hose from the front lawn. The Administrator agreed to conduct in-service trainig with all staff regarding this section. Copy of training will be submitted to LPA by POC date.
May 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
At 10:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted unannounced visit to this facility in conjunction with a complaint, control #31-AS-20260505111640. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Upon arrival LPA observed the following: S1 present during the incident that occurred on 05/03/2026 was not fingerprint cleared/associated with the facility During the visit, LPA also conducted review of all incident reports on a system and did not observe an Incident Report submitted to the Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) in a timely manner. In addition, the Administrator admitted that no incident was submitted to the Regional Office (RO). Based on Title 22 Regulation: a written Unusual Incident / Injury Report shall be submitted to CCLD within seven (7) days of occurrence. LPAs informed the Administrator that all staff members are mandated reporters, and they are all responsible for reporting. LPA informed the Administrator to submit an incident report that occurred on: 09/10/2025 Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are cited and noted on LIC 809D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(A,B&D) · Plan of correction due date: May 19, 2026
Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person... ... any of the events specified in (A), (B) & (D)... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews conducted by LPA, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by failing to notify CCLD regarding R1's hospitalization on 05/03/26, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee shall ensure a written report is submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven (7) days of the occurrence of any of the events. Incident report shall be submitted to LPA by POC date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 19, 2026
Criminal Record Clearance: (d) All individuals subject to criminal record review shall be fingerprinted and sign a Criminal Record Statement under penalty of perjury. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA interview and record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by failing to obtain S1's fingerprint clearance prior to employement. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026
Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to complete S1's fingerprints and associate them with the facility prior to employement. Copy of LIC500 and proof of association will be submitted to LPA by POC date.
Apr 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 11:45am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Angela Panushkina and Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced annual inspection at the facility mentioned above. LPAs met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed for capacity of six (6) Non-Ambulatory, of which one (1) may be Bedridden in room #1 only. Hospice waiver is granted for two (2) residents. At approximately 12:00pm, LPAs toured the kitchen area and observed enough supplies of staple non-perishable for minimum 1 week and perishable for 2 days at the facility. All knives and sharps are observed to be locked in a kitchen drawer and inaccessible to residents. There is a fire extinguisher in the kitchen was fully charged. LPAs observed five (5) bedrooms designated for residents’ use. All bedrooms have sufficient lighting, properly furnished, clean and have appropriate bedding and linens. Auditory alarms were tested and observed to be operational. Facility also has awake staff at night. There are two (2) full bathrooms. All bathrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair. Properly supplied with toilet paper, soap and paper towels. The hot water temperature measured at 105.8°F. LPAs observed appropriate grab bar and non-skid mat. All trash cans in bathrooms had fitted lids to protect them from cross contamination. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 75°F. The Common areas are furnished with adequate furniture to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6) residents. Continue on LIC809-C At approximately 12:30pm, LPAs observed medications are centrally stored and locked in the kitchen cabinet, and inaccessible to residents in care. The first-aid kit has been inspected which has at least the following: tweezers, scissors, antiseptic, bandages, gauze, thermometer; including a current First Aid manual. The laundry is located by the kitchen. The washer/dryer appears to be in good condition. Laundry supplies are kept inaccessible when not in use with supervision. At 12:50pm, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and observed to be operable. At 1:00pm, LPAs toured the outside area of the facility. LPAs observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. The outdoor area was free of visible immediate hazards. LPAs discussed the importance of maintaining care and supervision to meet the needs of residents. Between 1:10pm to 2:00pm, LPAs reviewed records of five (5) residents and two (2) staff. Client and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. LPAs were informed that no Certificate of Liability Insurance is available at this time and will be provided to the department within two (2) weeks. Deficiency issued during this visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 9:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. Upon arrival, LPA met with the staff. Vanisa Campbell, who granted access to the facility and Administrator Sylvia Jackson was contacted via phone. The Administrator arrived shortly after. LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 9:45am LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant and observed the following: Facility is licensed for capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory, of which one (1) may be bedridden (in room #1). Facility also has a hospice waiver for two (2) residents. Kitchen: At approximately, 9:45 AM LPA toured the kitchen area and observed enough supplies of staple non-perishable for minimum 1 week and perishable for 2 days at the facility. All knives and sharps observed to be locked in a kitchen drawer. LPA observed that all cleaning supplies and laundry detergents are locked under the kitchen sink. LPA observed a fire extinguisher hanging on the kitchen wall and fully charged and purchased on 01/23/2025. Laundry is located by the kitchen and the washer and dryer were actively running and operational. Medications: At approximately, 9:50 AM LPA observed medications are centrally stored and locked in a kitchen cabinet. At 12:55 PM, during the medication review for Resident #1 (R1), LPA could not verify the accuracy of the medication administration due to the lack of incomplete Centrally Stored Medication Destruction Form. Administrator informed LPA that the Administrator did not complete the form and was unable to provide a reason. Continue on LIC 809C Bedrooms: LPA observed total of four (4) bedrooms designated for residents use. All bedrooms are properly furnished, clean and have appropriate bedding and linens. Facility has awake staff. Bathrooms: LPA observed two (2) bathrooms and both appeared to be clean and in good repair. Properly supplied with toilet papers, soap and paper towels. LPA observed appropriate grab bar and client's bathroom had non-skid mat. LPA observed appropriate hand washing signs posted in each bathroom. At 10:00 AM, hot water temperature measured at 113.7°F. Common Areas: The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 76°F. The living room and dining area appeared clean and were properly furnished. The living room has a television, comfortable furniture. No obstructions and or tripping hazards throughout the facility. The facility does not have a garage. LPA observed two closets, one by bedroom #4 where the extra linen and towels were stored, and another one by the living room where PPE supplies were stored. Outside areas: At approximately, 10:10 AM LPA toured the outside area of the facility. LPAs observed a clean covered patio and backyard furniture to accommodate the six (6) residents. Between 11:00am to 12:30pm, LPA reviewed records of five (5) residents and requested for one staff file. LPA was informed that Staff #1 (S1) file is not available for review since the Administrator did not complete a file yet. Resident files were not updated/completed. During the record review of the resident, LPA observed that Resident #4 (R4) was hospitalized twice. The first incident was on 12/09/2024, and the second incident was on 01/03/2025. LPA was informed that R4 was unresponsive on 12/09/2024 and was taken to the hospital. On 01/03/2025, R4 had a fall and R4’s lib was bleeding and R4 was taken to the hospital where R4 got stiches. LPA reviewed all incident reports on a system and did not observe any Incident Reports regarding R4. In addition, the Administrator admitted that no incident was submitted to the Regional Office (RO) since the Administrator did not know to submit an incident report to the department when such occurrences occur. Based on Title 22 Regulation: a written Unusual Incident / Injury Report shall be submitted to CCLD within seven (7) days of occurrence. LPA informed the Administrator that all staff members are mandated reporters and they are all responsible for reporting. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide monitors were tested at 12:35 PM, and observed to be functional. Continue on LIC 809C Administrative: LPA was not provided with a Certificate of Liability Insurance, LPA collected LIC500. Deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Appeal rights explained. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2025
20242 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure that resident can attend a video visit with a physician. Facility confiscated resident's personal item. Staff engaged in verbal altercation in presence of resident Resident doesn't have a call assistance button or a pendant
At 10:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angela Panushkina, conducted a subsequent visit to deliver final report. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1), Eka Darsono, who granted access to the facility. Administrator was contacted and LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator was unable to come in and designated S1 to sign for the report. During the initial visit conducted on 05/13/23, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 10:05am, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, relevant to the investigation. At approximately 10:10am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Between 10:30am – 12:10pm, LPA interviewed the Administrator, two (2) staff and five (5) out of five (5) residents. Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Administrator informed LPA that R1’s visitor, who was not R1’s Power of Attorney (POA), would be very demanding and request S1 to provide detailed, daily information regarding R1’s food intake, care, etc. LPA was also informed that it was not fair to other residents that S1 was not available due to the "interrogation" process conducted by R1's visitor. So, the Administrator asked R1’s visitor, in a very professional tone of voice, to stop questioning facility staff and requesting extra work, since the facility staff is well aware of their duties and responsibilities. In addition, five (5) out of five (5) residents interviewed, expressed no concerns regarding this allegation. Therefore, based on interviews and LPA observation, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Resident doesn't have a call assistance button or a pendant It was alleged that the facility has no call assistance button/pendant for the resident. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and was informed that although the facility has call buttons available to provide to the residents, currently none of their residents required/requested to have call buttons/pendants. Moreover, LPA was informed that all residents are verbal and when called for an assistance, the staff can easily hear the resident, since all four (4) bedrooms are located so close to one another. Two (2) staff members interviewed corroborated the statement provided by the Administrator. LPA was also informed that R1 has a bell, however, R1 never used it for an assistance. Instead, R1 just verbally called for help/assistance. During the interview with R1, at 12:20pm, LPA asked R1 to call the staff for an assistance. LPA observed R1 verbally called for help and S1 immediately responded. Lastly, five (5) out of five (5) residents interviewed, expressed no concerns regarding this allegation. Therefore, based on interviews and LPA observation, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiency cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered. Allegation: Facility did not ensure that resident can attend a video visit with a physician. It was alleged that the facility did not provide residents (R1 in particular) with Wi-Fi to be able to have a virtual/zoom appointment with their Physician. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and two (2) staff, who denied the above allegation. LPA was informed that the facility does have a Wi-Fi and Administrator provided the password. LPA was able to connect and use the facility Wi-Fi. Administrator also informed LPA that every time R1 is scheduled to see a doctor (in person or via zoom), the staff is willing to help/assist to get in, but R1 finds a reason to cancel and or reschedule. LPA conducted an interview with R1 who confirmed the statement provided by the Administrator. R1 also informed LPA that he/she didn’t feel well and canceled another appointment today (on 05/13/23) with the Dermatologist. Lastly, five (5) out of five (5) residents interviewed, expressed no concerns regarding this allegation. Based on interviews and LPA observation, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Facility confiscated resident's personal item. It was alleged that a package was delivered to the facility and a proof of delivery photo was available, however, the facility confiscated the order from R1. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and was informed that all packages/mail delivered for residents are always being distributed to their right owner. Moreover, interview with two (2) staff revealed that no package was delivered for R1 that was confiscated by the facility. In addition, interview with five (5) out of five (5) residents expressed no concern regarding this allegation. Lastly, LPA requested a photo proof of the package delivery at the door (from the witness) to be emailed/texted, but it was never provided. Therefore, based on interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff engaged in verbal altercation in presence of resident It was alleged that the Administrator is yelling at residents and their visitors. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and two (2) staff, and all parties interviewed denied the above allegation. Continue on LIC9099-Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230501105604
Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 9:30am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Angela Panushkina and Perchui Milena Khurshudyan arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. Upon arrival, LPAs met with the Administrator, who granted access to the facility. LPAs explained the reason for the visit. At 9:45am LPAs conducted a tour of the physical plant and observed the following: Facility is licensed for capacity of six (6) Non-Ambulatory, of which one (1) may be bedridden (in room #1). Facility also has a hospice waiver for two (2) residents. There are four (4) bedrooms designated for residents use, two (2) bathrooms and LPAs were informed that the facility has awake staff at night. Bedrooms are appropriately furnished and have appropriate lighting. Bathrooms have soap, paper towels and hand washing signs were observed. The hot water temperature measured at 113.7°F. Extra towels and linens were readily available. During the LPAs did not observe any immediate health and safety concerns. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide monitors were tested at 11:20am and observed to be functional. Facility maintains a temperature of 77°F. LPAs observed there to be sufficient stock of one-week perishable foods and two-day non-perishable foods. Frozen foods are properly wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Sharps, cleaning supplies and medications are centrally stored and are kept locked in various kitchen cabinets and drawers. The fire extinguisher was observed in the kitchen area and was last serviced on 10/26/2023. Laundry is located by the kitchen, and LPA observed all chemicals and detergents are kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPAs observed a clean covered patio and backyard furniture to accommodate the six (6) residents. Between 11:00am to 12:00pm, LPA reviewed records of four (4) clients and one (1) staff. Resident and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. LPA collected Certificate of Liability Insurance and LIC500. No citations issued during this visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2024
Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
At 09:30am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Perchui Milena Khurshudyan and Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit. The team met with the Administrator Sylvia Jackson and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of todays visit is to review all residents and staff files for an accuracy. Team was informed that the facility currently has five (4) residents. Facility also has three (2) staff members, but during today's visit the team observed one staff member (S1) on duty. The team checked the Licensing Information System (LIC) and observed that (S1) is associated with this facility and the fingerprints are cleared. Resident Files: At 9:40am team conducted resident and staff records review. The following was observed. Four (4) out of four (4) resident facility files had all required documents. Staff Files: Administrator stated that the facility currently has four (2) staff members. All required documents and trainings are on file. No deficiencies are issued during today’s visit. Exit interviewed conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 8 documents
20233 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
At 09:30am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Angela Panushkina, Huma Rahimi, Leslie Ngo-Castaneda and Gina Saucedo conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit. The team met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. On 12/01/22, an informal meeting was held at the Regional Office (RO) with the Administrator and concerns from Complaint #31-AS-20220210102557 were addressed. At that time, Regional Manager (RM) and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) advised the Administrator to conduct thorough pre-admission appraisals and complete staff training on Basic Services. The purpose of todays visit is to review all resident and staff files for an accuracy. Team was informed that the facility currently has five (5) residents. Facility also has three (3) staff members, but during today's visit the team observed one staff member (S1) on duty. The team checked the Licensing Information System (LIC) and observed that S1 is associated with this facility and the fingerprints are cleared. Resident Files: At 9:45am team conducted resident and staff records review. The following was observed. Five (5) out of five (5) resident file were either not available and or incomplete. Files were missing TB test results for four (4) out of five (5) residents, ID Emergency Sheets, and personal rights. Resident appraisals that were in the file did not have services explained and were missing signatures from the resident, and or responsible party. Please see LIC858 included with this report. Staff Files: Administrator stated that the facility currently has four (4) staff members. However, none of the staff members had a facility file available for review. Therefore, the following deficiencies are issued per CA Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. Exit interviewed discussed, appeal rights explained and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 19, 2023
87506 Resident Records: (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Resident records were incomplete and or missing documents, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to complete five (5) out of five (5) resident files.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87412(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 19, 2023
87412 Personnel Records: (a) The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee. Each personnel record shall contain the following information: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Upon LPA's request Licensee/Administrator was unable to provide S1's facility records. LPA was informed that S1 got hired in Fabruary 2023 and no file was completed. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to have a individual file for each staff member along with the training certificate.
Mar 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident 1 (R1) was neglected while living at the facility
This report is an addendum to the previous licensing report issued on 11/18/2022. After further review of available information, the final finding of the allegation was changed. At 10:22 a.m. on 03/11/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with staff and disclosed the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation "Resident 1 (R1) was neglected while living at the facility", it was alleged that as a result of neglect, R1 was found unresponsive and was admitted to the hospital. LPA conducted an initial visit on 02/11/2022 at 10:10 a.m. and interviewed the administrator and conducted a facility record review. At 2:00 p.m. on 08/06/2022, LPA conducted a review of R1’s medical records obtained from Kaiser Permanente. On 09/19/2022 between 11:30 a.m. and 12:00pm, LPA conducted a follow-up interview with the Administrator and received photographic evidence regarding R1’s bruises and overall skin condition. Unsubstantiated ***This page was ammended to change findings from Substantiated to Needs Further Investigation. For final findings, see report delivered on 03/11/2023*** Information received revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 11/14/2020 upon discharge from the Kaiser Hospital. Upon arrival, R1 was covered in bruises all over their body. The Administrator took pictures of R1 bruises. The Administrator verified that they had knowledge of R1’s multiple health problems requiring close supervision. Further interviews revealed that R1 was retained in the facility between 11/14/2020 to 11/23/2020. Facility staff assisted R1 with incontinence care and never saw any redness or rashes on R1’s body. On 11/23/2020, staff attended to the resident and found R1 unresponsive. 911 was called and R1 was transferred to the hospital. A review of Hospital records revealed that R1 was admitted to the hospital on 11/12/2020 and discharged on 11/13/2020. R1 had multiple health problems requiring close supervision and frequent attendance. R1 was readmitted to the hospital on 11/23/2020 due to being unresponsive. The information revealed from medical records verified the information received from interviews. Overall interviews of facility staff and review of facility records does not reveal any relevant information to conclude that R1’s care and supervision was neglected at the facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. During complaint investigation LPA noted other Title 22 deficiencies unrelated to the complaint. The deficiencies were addressed during case management visits conducted on 02/11/2022 and 01/31/2023. Exit interview was conducted and copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2023 · control 31-AS-20220210102557
Jan 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 9:40 a.m. on 01/31/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced annual visit. LPA met with the Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA and Administrator toured the facility inside and out. The facility was last visited on 11/01/2022 for a complaint visit. It is a single story building with 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, kitchen, garage, common areas, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for 6 nonambulatory residents, of which may be bedridden. Approved hospice waivers for 2 residents. At the main entrance, LPA observed a maintained front yard and a covered patio area with seating in good condition. The screening station contained a visitors’ log, digital thermometer, N95 masks, and surgical masks. Postings included confidential complaint contacts, Ombudsman contacts, personal rights, facility sketch, and facility license. Walls, floors, ceilings, windows, screens, and blinds were clean and in good repair. At 9:52 a.m. LPA measured the room temperature to be 70 degrees Fahrenheit. At 9:55 a.m. LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher in the kitchen. LPA observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food. The stove hood was clean and appliances were functional. Sharps were locked below the counter top. The counter top had a crack in it. The Administrator stated the crack is scheduled to be repaired. Cleaning solutions and detergents were locked below the sink. Medications were locked near the kitchen. A laundry area near a side exit contained a washer and dryer in working condition. The facility had 4 bedrooms. Bedroom #1 was vacant and private. Bedroom #2 and Bedroom #3 were shared bedrooms. Bedroom #2 had a resident with full bed rails who was on hospice. Bedroom #4 was a private room. All bedrooms contained a chair, nightstand, lamp, storage, and bed with adequate bedding. All furnishings were clean and in good condition. The facility had 2 bathrooms. All bathrooms contained liquid soap, handwashing instruction signs, grab bars in the shower, and a non-skid mat in the shower. At 10:06 a.m. LPA measured the water temperature in the women’s bathroom to be 112.8 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed a resident smoking in the back yard patio. The area was shaded and contained seating in good repair. All emergency exit paths were free from obstructions. At 10:11 a.m, LPA tested the dual-functioning smoke and carbon monoxide detector in the hallway to be operational. During today's inspection, the facility is in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2023
Jan 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
At 11:05 a.m. on 01/31/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with the Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. At 3:30 p.m. on 12/01/2022, a Non-Compliance Conference was held at the Woodland Hills-South Regional Office to discuss complaint #31-AS-20220210102557 and other facility deficiencies. Attendees included Licensee Sylvia Jackson, Regional Manager (RM) Angela Kendrick, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Cassandra Harris, and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed. The conference was later changed to an Informal Conference. LPM, LPA, and Licensee discussed the nature of the allegation of neglect. All parties agreed the allegation was not appropriate for the deficient facility practices. Therefore, the allegation was successfully appealed and dismissed. The facility deficiencies are addressed during today’s case management visit. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 11/14/2020 and was sent to West Hills Hospital on 11/23/2020 after R1 was found unresponsive. During the 12/01/2022 Informal Conference, the Administrator noted the facility should have performed a more complete preadmission appraisal to identify R1’s pressure injuries prior to admission. Additionally, resident files stored at the facility were incomplete. The deficiencies are addressed on the following LIC 809-D page. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report issued. Appeal Rights discussed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87457(c) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 3, 2023
87457 Pre-Admission Appraisal - General (c) Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed and shall include an appraisal of his/her individual service needs This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section ctied above in 1 out of 5 residents which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a written statement regarding the cited section.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 3, 2023
87506 Resident Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section ctied above in at least 1 resident which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure complete and current records are maintained at the facility for all residents in care by the POC due date.
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
NCC changed to an Informal Conference At 3:30 p.m. on 12/01/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Cassandra Harris, Regional Manager (RM) Angela Kendrick, and Licensee Sylvia Jackson held an Non-Compliance Conference. Licensee was given the opportunity to review the Community Care Licensing (CCL) file for Hepzebah House, containing licensing reports for the past three years. Regional Manager (RM) Angela Kendrick explained the purpose of the non-compliance conference and the administrative process. Today's conference primarily addresses concerns from Complaint #31-AS-20220210102557 in which the allegation "resident was neglected while living at the facility" was substantiated. A resident arrived to the facility on 11/14/2020 in poor condition. A preplacement appraisal was not conducted properly, and the resident was admitted to the hospital on 11/23/2022 with unstageable pressure injuries. Community Care Licensing issued the following deficiencies: 87464(f)(1) Basic Services Licensee Sylvia Jackson submitted a first level appeal of the substantiation on 11/28/2022. Licensee stated the resident was rotated every 2 hours and the best possible care was provided for the resident. Community Care Licensing issued the following deficiencies during a Case Management visit on 02/11/2022: 87355(a) Criminal Background Clearance 87463(c) Reappraisals 87458(a) Medical Assessment All staff now maintain current criminal background clearances. Licensee Sylvia noted the difficulty with the preadmission process, stating the resident was admitted "too soon" and had many impressions and red marks on their body. Licensee believed the resident came directly from the hospital. The licensee trusted the referral agent. The resident was able to rotate independently. Licensee recalls the resident was admitted for approximately 5 days when they were noticed unresponsive in the morning. RM and LPM advised to conduct thorough pre-admission appraisals. After consideration, RM opted that the meeting be changed to an Informal Conference between LPM, LPA, and Licensee. LPM suggested a TSP referral for the facility. LPA will visit the facility within two weeks. LPM will review the complaint. LPA to amend the LIC 9099s from 11/1/2022 and 11/18/2022 to Unsubstantiated and create a Case Management visit to substantiate the allegation that the licensee should not have admitted the resident. LPA will also review resident records and staff trainings.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2022
Feb 11, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B, Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
At approximately 10:15 AM on 02/11/22, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. Census: 4 During the course of the complaint investigation, LPA found deficiencies. LPA was greeted at the door by an individual without a criminal background clearance. Administrator was not present at the facility when LPA arrived, and only the individual was present. Both the individual and Administrator stated the individual was supervising residents in care because the Administrator felt ill. LPA reviewed records for Resident #1 (R1), Resident #2 (R2), Resident #3 (R3), and Resident #4 (R4). Resident records of R1, R2, and R3 did not contain Physician Reports or reappraisals within the past 12 months. LPA conducted exit interview, issued civil penalties, discussed appeal rights, and issued report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(c) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 14, 2022
87463 Reappraisals (c) The licensee shall arrange a meeting with the resident... when there is significant change in the resident’s condition, or once every 12 months, whichever occurs first. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, R1, R2, and R3 did not have reappraisails in their facility files. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee will conduct reappraisals for R1, R2, and R3 by the POC date and fax to LPA for verification.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 14, 2022
87458 Medical Assessment (a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain and keep on file, documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a physician, made within the last year. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on records review, R1, R2, and R3 did not have Physician Reports or medical assesments in their facility files. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee will obtain medical assessments for R1, R2, and R3 from residents' primary care physicians by the POC date and fax to LPA for verification.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 12, 2022
87355 Criminal Record Clearance (a) The Department shall conduct a criminal record review of all individuals... and shall have the authority to approve or deny a facility license, or employment, residence, or presence in the facility, based upon the results of such review. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on LPA observations and interviews, the individual providing supervision to residents in care did not submit a criminal background clearance to the department. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee will prohibit the individual from the premises. Licensee will ensure associated staff are present before leaving the facility. Licensee will provide a statement of these changes to LPA by the POC date to maintain on record.
Jan 25, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At approximately 9:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced annual inspection using the Infection Control Domain. LPA met with Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. Census: 4 Entry: Upon entry, LPA observed a ramp in good repair and a sign on the front door indicating cleaning practices, mask requirements, and social distancing. Screening: LPA observed a screening station with 2 boxes of gloves, N95 masks, hand sanitizer, and a thermometer. Administrator screened LPA upon entry. LPA advised Administrator to use a visitor log to document temperature, symptom check, and contact tracing information. Common Area: LPA observed socially distant accommodations in the living room and dining area. Administrator noted residents remain socially distant during meals, and meal times are staggered. Kitchen: LPA observed a locked cabinet below the kitchen with 3 bottles of liquid soap for resident use. LPA suggested a handwashing sign by the kitchen sink. Bedrooms: The facility has 4 bedrooms, of which 1 is shared and 3 are private. The shared bedroom and two private bedrooms are occupied, and one private bedroom is vacant. Bathrooms: The facility has 2 bathrooms. Both bathrooms were clean and contained signs for handwashing instructions. Soap and paper towels are provided for resident use and are stored in a supply cabinet. The bathrooms with the shower contained non-skid mats and grab bars by the toilet and shower. Laundry: LPA observed a laundry are with washer and dryer. Administrator noted the ability to sanitize the machines with bleach after each load. Outdoors: LPA observed a well-maintained outdoor area. All paths were from obstructions. Isolation: In the event of a COVID-positive resident, Administrator is able to isolate the resident in the vacant, private bedroom. All meals and medications would be served by staff with PPE. The facility has adequate PPE and staff are trained on donning and doffing. The facility also has an alternate staffing plan in case of staff shortages. Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Nov 19, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained deep tissue pressure injury Staff refused to seek medical attention for resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to finish investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. It is alleged that resident #1 (R1) sustained deep tissue pressure injury due to facility neglect. LPA conducted a previous visit on 8/31/21 where LPA conducted interviews with the administrator and obtained copies of pertinent information related to the complaint allegation. LPA also requested and received copies of R1’s hospice records which include R1’s treatment plan, visit notes, and wound treatment notes. Interviews on 8/31/21 revealed that R1 came into the facility on 3/19/21 under hospice care. A review of hospice records was conducted on 10/30/21. Records indicated that R1 first developed pressure injuries on 6/24/21. It was also noted on 6/24/21 that the pressure injuries that R1 developed would not be expected to heal due to R1’s co-morbidities. Unsubstantiated Over time, R1’s wounds worsened even though R1 was receiving wound treatment and visits from a hospice nurse several times a week between 6/24/21 and 8/22/21. Eventually on 8/22/21, R1 was placed on continuous hospice where they had a nurse with R1 twenty-four hours a day. The reason for R1 developing deep tissue injuries was not due to facility negligence. A review of hospice records and wound treatment notes did not indicate that facility staff were negligent in treating R1 while R1 was at the facility. This allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Staff refused to seek medical attention for resident It is alleged that R1's responsible person suggested that R1 be taken to the hospital due to their condition and the administrator refused to see medical attention for R1. LPA previously conducted interviews with R1's responsible person on 9/8/21 and with the facility administrator on 8/31/21. LPA also reviewed R1's hospice records on 10/30/21. Information obtained from interviews revealed that R1's responsible person did inquire with the administrator about R1 going to the hospital. Administrator explained that R1's condition was being treated under hospice care and that she would call R1's hospice nurse which she did do. A review of R1's hospice file revealed that R1 was being checked on several times a week between 6/24/21 through 8/22/21 due to their condition. Based on the information obtained through interviews and record review R1 was not refused medical attention therefore this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit Interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210830153133
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the May 12, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Jackson, Sylvia, licensed since 2020.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 15
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Hepzebah House
Is Hepzebah House licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Hepzebah House licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Hepzebah House been cited?
0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.
Is Hepzebah House still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Hepzebah House cost?
$5,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,350–$6,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Hepzebah House take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Jackson, Sylvia, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
UCLA West Valley Medical Center is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Hepzebah House keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Hepzebah House license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “HEPZEBAH HOUSE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609871. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Jackson, Sylvia, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 15 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 28, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,550–$6,800On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County