Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Granada Golden YearsLicense #197609748 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareGranada Golden YearsLicense #197609748 · 17201 Lahey St, Granada Hills, CA · (818) 535-9693Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Granada Hills/Granada Golden Years
Map · 17201 Lahey St

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,700/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (818) 535-9693

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

GG

Call Granada Golden Years

Granada Hills · Licensed for 6

(818) 535-9693

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Granada Hills

Granada Golden Years

17201 Lahey St, Granada Hills, CA 91344 · Licensed since 2019

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Granada Golden Years

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,700 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 4 residents
  • Hospiceup to 6 residents
  • Bedridden

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 OF WHICH ARE 4 NON-AMBULATORY AND 2 BEDRIDDEN TO RESIDE IN BEDROOM #4; APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 HOSPICE RESIDENTS

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Granada Golden Years: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,700a month to start

Likely $3,850–$5,750

From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,700likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,700likely $3,850–$5,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,850–$5,950
$4,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,550–$9,150
$7,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes14 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,500

$3,000$7,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

14 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,100–$6,550.

  • Grant Serenity of Granada HillsGranada Hills · 0.4 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Balboa Senior LivingGranada Hills · 0.7 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alalik Care HomeGranada Hills · 1.3 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Aurora Home for SeniorsGranada Hills · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alaga HomesNorthridge · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 3.5 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Agape Senior ResidenceChatsworth · 3.7 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of Sunshine PlusNorthridge · 3.8 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Caring Touch Board and CareChatsworth · 3.8 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 4.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Paradise in the ValleyNorthridge · 4.3 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lily of the ValleyNorthridge · 4.4 mi · Small home
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of Sunshine HarmonyArleta · 4.9 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

17201 Lahey St, Granada Hills, CA 91344Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Providence Holy Cross Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.7 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609748 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 5 of 11 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to improper transfer assistance, the resident experienced a fall incident Staff did not ensure resident was fed resulting in extreme weight loss

On 02/18/26, at 9:37am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gina Saucedo arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced, initial complaint visit and was greeted by Caregiver,Bibigul Batyrbekova. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to gather information, interview staff and residents and deliver findings for this complaint. On 02/18/26, LPA Saucedo asked for the census, staff, and resident rosters. On 02/18/26, at 10:15am, LPA Saucedo conducted a physical tour. On 02/18/26, at 10:20am, LPA Saucedo started to conduct resident and staff interviews. Furthermore, LPA reviewed and obtained, Resident #1 (R1)'s preplacement appraisal, admission agreement, Medical Assessment and Identification and Emergency Information. LIC 9099C-continued Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Due to improper transfer assistance, the resident experienced a fall incident. It is being alleged that while staff were transferring resident #1 (R1), R1 fell and broke their right hip. LPA obtained an Unusual Incident Report on 12/31/25, where it says R1 fell while in their room and 911 along with their spouse were notified immediately. LPA interviewed three (3) staff that have confirmed R1 fell in their room without any assistance. Staff #1 (S1) confirmed that they heard a loud noise and ran to R1’s room but R1 was already on the floor. Staff #2 (S2) confirmed they were helping another resident when S1 requested for their assistance with R1 to help get R1 up from the floor. S1 and S2 immediately called the administrator and 911 was called. In addition, staff reported that "R1 had dementia, had a walker but at times R1 would forget to ask for help and use the walker and would get up on their own." LPA spoke to R1’s spouse and R1’s spouse confirmed that R1 had dementia was fragile and had mobility problems and that the facility immediately called them when R1 fell and R1 was also transferred to a hospital that day. R1’s spouse also confirmed that "R1 was transferred to a skilled nursing a couple days after they went to the hospital and does not blame the facility for what happened to R1 because R1 was already deteriorating at a fast pace when R1 was taken to the facility the beginning of December 2025." Furthermore, LPA interviewed one (1) out of 3 (three) residents that confirmed they were there when R1 fell in their room, there was three (3) staff present and the ambulance came for R1. Therefore, based on the record reviews and interviews conducted the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not ensure resident was fed resulting in extreme weight loss. It is being alleged that resident #1 (R1) was losing weight prior to moving to the above facility and lost an additional 10-15lbs while at the facility. This allegation can be referenced to control number-31-AS-20251230162335. It was recently investigated on 01/07/26. R1's medical assessment on 12/03/25, shows that R1 weighed 134llbs and R1's nurse visit on 12/16/25 (under Palliative Care) indicated that R1 weighed 150lbs and actually gained weight while at the facility. Let it be noted, R1 was transferred to a hospital on 12/30/25 and did not return to the above facility. Therefore, based on the record review and interviews conducted the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. An exit interview was conducted, no citation(s) were issued for the above allegation(s), and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260211123251
Jan 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident became dehydrated while in care due to staff neglect Resident became malnourished while in care due to staff neglect

On 01/07/26, at 10:40am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gina Saucedo arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced, initial complaint visit and was greeted by Caregiver,Bibigul Batyrbekova. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to gather information, interview staff and residents and deliver findings for this complaint. On 01/07/26, LPA Saucedo asked for the census, staff, and resident rosters. On 01/07/26, at 10:50am, LPA Saucedo conducted a physical tour. On 01/07/26, at 11:10am, LPA Saucedo started to conduct resident and staff interviews. LIC 9099C-continued Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Resident became dehydrated while in care due to staff neglect. It is being alleged that resident #1 (R1) was dehydrated upon arrival at the hospital. LPA conducted three (3) staff interviews that confirmed R1 would eat blended food as drinks including ensure. Additionally, LPA interviewed R1's spouse that confirmed R1 was not dehydrated. R1's spouse stated, "that R1 was losing weight at home and had lost a total of thirty (30) pounds and they could no longer take care of R1 so R1 was admitted to the facility on 12/05/25. R1's spouse also indicated that R1's doctor had R1 do blood work, a ct scan and ultra sound just to make sure R1 did not have cancer." Furthermore, R1 was under Hospice/Palliative Services. LPA interviewed R1's nurse that was taking care of R1 and they stated, "R1 would eat and drink in small portions, R1's diagnosis was dementia and R1 was able to use the bathroom-had wet soil on their diaper so R1 was not dehydrated." LPA interviewed two (2) residents that confirmed they eat very well and get all their meals. Furthermore, LPA reviewed and obtained, R1's preplacement appraisal, admission agreement, Medical Assessment, Identification and Emergency Information and Hospice notes that indicate R1 had dementia and was on a puree diet. Therefore, based on the record review and interviews conducted the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Resident became malnourished while in care due to staff neglect. It is being alleged that resident #1 (R1) was malnourished upon arrival at the hospital. LPA conducted three (3) staff interviews that confirmed R1 was on a puree diet and would have to eat all their foods blended. In addition, LPA interviewed R1's spouse that confirmed R1 was not eating much prior to going to the facility and furthermore, they would visit R1 almost everyday and they were trying to feed R1, it was not the facility's fault." R1's spouse also stated, "that R1 had lost a total of thirty (30) pounds prior to being admitted to the facility on 12/05/25. Furthermore, R1 was under Hospice/Palliative Services. LPA interviewed R1's nurse that was taking care of R1 and they stated, "R1 would eat and drink in small portions, R1's diagnosis was dementia and R1 also had aspiration problems so we had to be careful when feeding R1. LPA interviewed two (2) residents that confirmed they eat very well and get all their meals. Furthermore, LPA reviewed and obtained, R1's preplacement appraisal, admission agreement, Medical Assessment, Identification and Emergency Information and Hospice notes that indicate R1 had dementia and was on a puree diet. R1's medical assessment on 12/03/25, shows that R1 weighed 134llbs and R1's nurse visit on 12/16/25 indicated that R1 weighed 150lbs and actually gained weight while at the facility. Therefore, based on the record review and interviews conducted the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. An exit interview was conducted, no citation(s) were issued for the above allegation(s), and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2026 · control 31-AS-20251230162335

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yell at resident in care

On 12/29/25, at 9:45am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gina Saucedo arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced, subsequent complaint visit and was greeted by Caregiver, Bibigul Batyrbekova. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to gather additional information and deliver findings for this complaint. Mariam Balasanyan, the Administrator was called and arrived shortly after. On 10/01/25, LPA Saucedo conducted the initial visit. On 10/01/25, LPA Saucedo asked for the census, staff, and resident rosters. On 10/01/25, LPA Saucedo conducted a physical tour and interviewed staff. On 12/29/25, LPA Saucedo conducted another physical tour, interviewed residents and obtained relevant documents. LIC 9099C-continued Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff do not administer medication(s) to resident in care as prescribed by their physician. It is being alleged that resident #1 (R1) did not receive their prescribed medications. LPA asked for R1's MAR-Medication Administration Record and or centralized stored medication form and two (2) staff stated, "they do no keep a MAR and/or centralized stored medication form for any of the residents." Although, LPA interviewed (3) three residents that confirmed their medication is being provided to them everyday, the medication they receive is not being documented and there is no list of medication being received. Therefore, based on the LPA's observations, staff and resident interviews, the above allegation(s) above is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Resident developed bed sores due to staff neglect. It is being alleged that resident #1 (R1) developed bed sores due to staff being neglectful. During LPA’s interview with staff two (2) staff confirmed that R1 needed a lot of help. One (1) staff member confirmed that R1 just wanted to stay in bed and R1 was also difficult to lift. During LPA’s interview with two (2) witnesses they confirmed that R1 had obtained wounds at the facility. Both witnesses did not know what stage the wounds were. During LPA’s record review it was determined that R1 was not under the care of home health and/or hospice for wound care. In addition, R1's pre-placement appraisal, physician's report and Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan did not indicate that R1 had any bed sores/wounds at the time of admission. Let it be noted, R1's admission was on 08/05/2025. The facility did not update and/or do a resident appraisal indicating that R1 was developing a wound and R1 was not sent to the hospital. LPA requested medical records from Kaiser Permanente, and it was determined that R1 was admitted on 09/23/25 at the hospital and had one (1) wound and a deep tissue injury- the wound was on the coccyx of R1 stageable as two (2) and the deep tissue injury was on the right heel of R1’s foot. Therefore, based on the medical records and interviews conducted the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. An exit interview was conducted, citation(s) were issued, a civil penalty issued, appeal rights and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator. Regarding the allegation: Staff yell at resident in care. It is being alleged that the staff have yelled at resident #1 (R1). LPA interviewed three (3) residents that confirmed staff have never yelled at them. During LPA’s interview with two (2) staff confirmed that they have never yelled at any of the residents. LPA also interviewed R1's sister that confirmed the staff at the above facility are super nice. During LPA’s physical tour, LPA did not witness any staff yelling at the residents. Therefore, based on the observations and interviews conducted the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. An exit interview was conducted, no citation(s) were issued for the above allegation(s), and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250924160323

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 30, 2025

(a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (1)Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement is not met: Based on the LPA's record review from Kaiser Permanente the licensee/administrator failed to ensure that the facility admitted and/or retained a resident with a stage 2 wound and with a deep tissue injury without home health/hospice. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025

Plan of correction: An immediate civil penalty of $500 assessed. As POC, licensee will obtain training to address this section of the regulation. Proof of the training is due to Community Care Licensing Department no later than 12/30/25.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(H)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 12, 2026

Incidental Medical and Dental Care(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained for at least one year and includes: This requirement is not met by: Based on the LPA's record review and interviews the licensee/administrator failed to ensure that the facility retained and/or assured a record of centrally stored medication. This posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025

Plan of correction: As POC, licensee will obtain training to address this section of the regulation. Proof of the training is due to Community Care Licensing Department no later than 01/12/26.

Jul 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the staff, Rita Balasanyan and explained the reason for the visit. The administrator, Mariam Balasanyan, was notified over the telephone. At approximately 11:15am, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. The facility is a one story building, licensed to serve clients sixty (60) years of age and above. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detector is dual, hardwired and inter-connected. There is a fully charged fire extinguisher that is located near the dining room. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer. Cleaning supplies were stored locked underneath the kitchen sink. Bedrooms: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. The bedrooms, were observed to be properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Exits were clear of hazards and obstruction. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms. One bathroom designated for residents, and one designated for staff. The bathrooms used by residents were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured at 111 degrees Fahrenheit. There were no cleaning supplies or hazardous items observed in the bathrooms. Common Areas: These included the living room, family room and dining area. The living room is furnished with a couch, recliner, chair, and ottoman. There is a check in desk at the entrance. There is a fireplace that is properly screened. It is non-functional, and no tools were present. The family room has two sofas a chair, a coffee table, another small table and a television. Access to the backyard is through the family room. The dining room table is large enough to seat up to six residents. Auditory alarms on all exit doors were functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits to the front and back yards are free of obstruction. There is outdoor furniture appropriate for outside use. Both the front and back yards have sufficient yard space. There is no swimming pool or any other bodies of water. Garage: The garage is attached to the house. It is used as storage. Garage was kept locked and inaccessible to residents during the day's visit. Laundry: The laundry area is located by the kitchen. There is a locked cabinet by the laundry area where detergents and cleaning supplies are kept. Resident Files: Resident records are kept locked in a cabinet in the family room. LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance. Staff Files: Staff records are also kept locked in a cabinet in the family room. LPA conducted a file review of staff records to insure compliance. Medications: Medications and medication records are kept locked in a cabinet located at the family room. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2025

20241 state visit · 1 document

Oct 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the staff, Rita Balasanyan and explained the reason for the visit. The administrator, Mariam Balasanyan, was notified over the telephone. Administrator could not make the visit at this time. The facility is a one story building, licensed to serve clients sixty years of age and above. At approximately 9:00am, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detector is dual and are hardwired. There is a fully charged fire extinguisher that is located near the dining room. It was purchased September 29, 2024. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Bedrooms: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. The bedrooms, in use by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms. One bathroom designated for residents, and one designated for staff. The bathrooms used by residents were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured at 107 degrees Fahrenheit. There were no cleaning supplies or hazardous items observed in the bathrooms. Common Areas: These included the living room, family room and dining area. The living room is furnished with a couch, recliner, two chairs, large chest drawer, television and a large ottoman footstool. There is a fireplace that is properly screened with glass door. Fireplace is non-functional, and no tools were present. The family room has two sofas a chair, a coffee table, another small table and a television. Access to the backyard is through the family room. The dining room table is large enough to seat up to six residents. Auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. Garage: The garage is attached to the house. It is used as storage. Garage was kept locked and inaccessible to residents during the day's visit. Laundry: The laundry area is located by the kitchen. There is a locked cabinet by the laundry area where detergents and cleaning supplies are kept. Resident Files: Resident records are kept locked in a cabinet in the family room. LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance. Staff Files: Staff records are also kept locked in a cabinet in the family room. LPA conducted a file review of staff records to insure compliance. Medications: Medications and medication records are kept locked in a cabinet located at the family room. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 6 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Nov 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Mariam Balasanyan and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 11:18am, with the assistance of the administrator, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detector is dual and are hardwired. There is a fully charged fire extinguisher is located near the dining room. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Bedrooms: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. The bedrooms, in use by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms. One bathroom designated for residents, and one designated for staff. The bathrooms used by residents were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured at 105 degrees Fahrenheit. There were no cleaning supplies observed in the bathrooms. Common Areas: These included the living room, family room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Medications and medication records are kept locked in a closet located at the living room. Staff and resident records are also maintained there. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area is located by the kitchen. There is a locked cabinet by the laundry area where detergents and cleaning supplies are kept. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were review for proper documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2023

20225 state visits · 5 documents

Nov 18, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair Staff forced residents to discard used toilet paper in the trash can Staff did not report an incident as required

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Patrick Shanahan, arrived at the facility in response to the above allegations. The LPA was made aware of all issues prior to receiving this complaint and all allegations were addressed during a Case Management visit on 11/7/2022. The LPA was able to speak to staff and the administrator regarding this visit. Allegation 1. Facility is in disrepair On 11/7/2022 the LPA conducted a case management visit to the home. The LPA was able to interview staff, the administrator and the residents regarding this issue. Staff and the administrator confirmed that a plumbing issue had occurred and that the resident restroom was not functional for about 2 days. While touring room number 3, the LPA also observed that the floor next to the door had buckled and was preventing the door from closing. Based on LPA observation, this allegation is deemed substantiated. The LPA issued a deficiency for this allegation on 11/7/22 and the floor was corrected on 11/13/22 and has since been cleared. Substantiated Allegation 2. Staff forced residents to discard used toilet paper in the trash can LPA was able to interview staff, residents and the administrator regarding this allegation on 11/7/2022 during a case management visit. Staff interviewed confirmed that they had told residents not to throw used toilet paper in the toilet after use and to use a trash can. The administrator also confirmed that they had requested that residents use the trash can because the pipes in the house were old and this would prevent the pipes from clogging up. Residents also stated that they were told not to discard toilet paper in the toilet and to use the trash can for the waste. This allegation is deemed substantiated. Deficiencies were issued during the case management on 11/7/2022 and the Plan of Corrections have been received. Allegation 3. Staff did not report an incident as required The LPA was able to interview the administrator regarding this allegation on 11/7/2022 during a case management visit. The administrator admitted that she did not submit an incident report regarding the the broken pipe issues or the damage to the floor. The facility was issued a deficiency on 11/7/2022 and the plan of correction has since been submitted. Based on the admission from the administrator, this allegation is deemed substantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221115135709
Nov 7, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Patrick Shanahan, arrived at the home in response to a notification that the facility toilet had not been functioning properly. The LPA was able to tour the home, interview staff, and interview residents. LPA toured the home and observed that both facility toilets were functioning properly. Interview with staff and residents did confirm, that about 2 weeks ago the toilet had been clogged and it took a few days for the issue to be corrected. While touring room number 3, the LPA did observe that the floor boards in the room had been warped due to water damage for the blocked toilet. The door to room 3 will not close and the resident is unable to close the door properly. Interviews with staff and residents also indicated that the facility is not allowing residents to flush used toilet paper in the toilet and are directing them to throw it in a trash can. Facility staff stated that residents are asked to do this as a precaution, so that the toilets will not overflow. A review of the facility incident reports also indicated that a report was not submitted for the broken toilet or the repair. The LPA was able to discuss the issues over the phone with the administrator. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 8, 2022

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities-To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: The licensee did not allow residents to flush toilet paper in the toilet and had them throw it in the trash can, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to the residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2022

Plan of correction: The administrator will put in writing their understanding of this regulation and submit it to the LPA by the POC date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 9, 2022

Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing...within seven days of the occurrence of any events specified in The licensee did not submit an incident report regarding the broken toilet, which posed a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2022

Plan of correction: The administrator agrees to submit an incident report and submit it by the POC date

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80087(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 14, 2022

80087 Buildings and Grounds (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times for the safety and well-being of clients, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation, the licensee did fix a residents floor causing a resident to not be able to close the door, which poses a potential risk to the resident in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator will have the floor fixed and submit pictures of the correction by the POC date

Sep 7, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff uses illegal drugs while providing care and supervision Staff behavior poses as a risk to the residents Residents are being over medicated while in care

Licensing Program Analyst arrived at the facility in order to complete these complaint allegations. The LPA was greeted by facility staff and explained the reason for the visit. Allegation 1. Staff uses illegal drugs while providing care and supervision LPA was able to speak with staff, residents and the administrator regarding this allegation. All residents confirmed that they have never seen a staff member under the influence of drugs or alchohol. A review of associated staff members indicated that the staff member in question is not associated to this facility and has never worked for this facility. The LPA was able to interview the back-up administrator who also confirmed that she has never suspected any of her staff of doing drugs, nor has she ever received a complaint of a staff member acting intoxicated at work. Based on interviews and review of the facility documents, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Continues on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation 2. Staff behavior poses as a risk to the residents LPA was able to interview all residents and staff in order to come to a finding for this allegation. All residents interviewed are verbal and cognizant of their surroundings. None of the residents interviewed felt as though the staff behavior ever posed a risk to their well being. All residents confirmed that staff are helpful and professional. An interview with the administrator assistant also confirmed that there has never been any complaints regarding the staffs behavior and the staff member in question does not work at this facility. Based on interviews with staff and residents, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Allegation 3. Residents are being over medicated while in care LPA was able to interview staff, residents and go through resident medications in order to come to findings for this allegation. All residents in the home are cognizant of their surroundings and their feelings. All residents confirmed that they have all been given their medications as prescribed and that they have never been drugged or over medicated. Facility staff also confirmed that all medications are given as prescribed and that all medications are correct. Medications for two residents were inspected by the LPA and were observed to be correct. Based on interviews and a medication review, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and report issued,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 7, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220803093341
Jun 7, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Patrick Shanahan, arrived at the facility and was greeted by facility staff. Staff took the LPA's temperature before allowing the LPA to enter the home. Staff was observed to be wearing a mask. The home has 4 bedrooms and two bathrooms. The smoke alarms appeared to be functional, as well as the carbon monoxide detector. The fire extinguisher was purchased on 5/19/2021 and appeared to be functional. Hand sanitizer, masks and gloves were also observed in the entry of the facility. The facility is currently following their mitigation plan and no deficiencies were observed during todays visit. Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 7, 2022
Feb 3, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Supervision: Staff neglected Resident #1 (R1) resulting in severe dehydration and multiple pressure injuries. Resident was placed on hospice without the consent of the responsible party. Facility staff did not ensure resident received physical therapy. Staff ordered medical equipment through the resident's insurance without consent. Facility staff overmedicated resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Guzman Chavez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA Guzman Chavez met with Administrator, Sevak Arutyunyan and explained the reason for the visit. On 05/22/2020, the Department received a complaint regarding an allegation of Neglect/Lack of Supervision. It was alleged that the Granada Golden Years staff neglected Resident #1 (R1) resulting in hospitalization with a diagnosis of severe dehydration and multiple pressure injuries. On 05/27/2020, from 9:45am to 11:15am., LPA Richardson conducted the initial complaint visit and met with staff Naira Alikhanyan and Administrator Sevak Arutyunyan at 9:45am. The LPA conducted a physical plant tour with staff Alikhanyan and at 10:30am reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. No immediate health and safety hazards were observed. The LPA briefly discussed the allegations with the Administrator and explained that further investigation was needed. ...Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated ...Continued from LIC 9099... The complaint was referred to Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Christine Ferris on 05/26/2020. Investigator Ferris conducted interviews with staff, residents and witnesses on 07/14/2020, 07/20/2020, 07/26/2020, and 08/05/2020. Investigator Ferris obtained copies of R1’s medical records from Northridge Hospital Medical Center on 06/24/2020; from Kaiser Permanente Panorama City on 06/18/2020; from Physician’s Preferred Hospice Care on 07/14/2020; from Omni Wound Physicians on 07/29/2020; and Astoria Nursing and Rehabilitation Center on 07/30/2020. On 07/15/2019, R1 was admitted to Astoria Skilled Nursing Facility due to multiple falls and non-compliance with medication regimen and home safety recommendations. R1 lived in own home prior to being admitted and refused to transition out of home or hire caregivers. A report for self-neglect was filed for R1 in January 2019 and again on 07/15/2019. R1 was discharged on 08/19/19 with diagnosis of right heel deep tissue injury and admitted to the Granada Golden Years facility. Information in the Hospice records indicated R1’s start of hospice care was 08/30/2019 and end of care date was 10/04/2019, the day R1 was admitted to the hospital. Hospice nurses provided wound care to R1 every 3 to 4 days. It was also noted that R1’s family were in communication with the hospice agency and aware R1 was receiving hospice services. Information reviewed in the OMNI Wound Physicians report indicated on 09/11/2019, R1 was treated for chronic wound to bilateral posterior heels as R1 was unable to move both lower extremities; left heel, pressure ulcer stage 3-chronic; pressure ulcer stage 4-chronic. A bilateral vascular study of the lower extremity arteries was performed for signs and risk faction of peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The study indicated non-compressible arteries on both extremities. High complexity, treatment course is prolonged due to sustained inflammation vascular factors-immobility. Staging care due to poor wound progression. R1 was seen again on 09/17/2019 where left buttock pressure ulcer stage 3 was added to the diagnoses and treatment plan. R1 was seen again by the wound care nurse on 09/24/2019 and 10/01/2019. ...Continued on LIC 9099C... ...Continued from LIC 9099C... On 10/04/2019, R1 was taken to the Northridge Hospital Medical Center Emergency Room due to R1 was noted to have altered mental status. During the ER visit, R1 was diagnosed with severe sepsis, acute parotitis, acute kidney injury, hypernatremia, and acute encephalopathy secondary to metabolic derangement. On 10/04/2019, R1 was transferred from the ER and admitted to Kaiser Permanente Panorama City for assessment. During the hospital stay, a speech pathology clinical swallow assessment was completed. The assessment results found that R1 demonstrated mild oral dysphagia with reduced mastication and swallow functional for soft foods with no signs of aspiration evidenced. The discharge summary dated 1019/2019, stated R1 was on hospice prior to admission and had a history of stroke, diabetes mellitus type 2, severe malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, and admitted 10/04/2019 for metabolic encephalopathy with severe hypernatremia, dehydration, acute chronic kidney failure, sepsis with MRSA bacteremia likely due to skin/decubitus ulcers and new onset atrial fibrillation. R1 was receiving hospice care during residency at the facility and per the hospice nurse, R1 was properly cared for by facility staff as they adhered to the instructions given to care for R1, communicated well concerning R1’s condition, and there was no concern for neglect or abuse. Per hospice records, R1 was receiving wound care by hospice nurses and OMNI Wound Physicians and R1’s decline was due to R1’s medical condition and not contributed to by facility staff. Based on the information and documentation obtained and reviewed, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of Neglect/Lack of Supervision. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Also, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was placed on hospice without the consent of the responsible party. Interview with R1’s family member revealed that the facility had mentioned to family member that R1 was on Hospice ‘indirectly’, but they did not know R1 was actually signed up with hospice care. However, interviews with the Physician’s Preferred Hospice Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) revealed that they personally called and spoke with R1’s family and explained what hospice entailed, the services provided, the care provided, the explanation of benefits, and the medical equipment. Interviews with hospital personnel also revealed that the primary skilled nurse was receiving phone calls from R1’s family concerning R1’s condition. ...Continued on LIC 9099C... ...Continued from LIC 9099C... Furthermore, interviews with staff revealed that R1’s family had contacted the hospice agency and approved the hospice services. Record review revealed that R1 signed themselves into hospice as they were able to make decisions on their own. Also, on page six of the Physician’s Preferred Hospice, Inc. Comprehensive Nursing Assessment, the narrative and disease trajectory states, “…services by Hospice MSW… were explained and offered to the family and the patient.” Additionally, on the RN Prognosis Summary of the Physician’s Preferred Hospice Care medical records stated, “…the family wishes no further aggressive treatment and has now opted for hospice care for symptoms management and comfort care only…services were discussed in detail with patient’s son and all consents for hospice care were signed.” Based on interviews and record review, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “resident was placed on hospice without the consent of the responsible party”. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was further alleged that staff did not ensure Resident #1 (R1) received physical therapy. Interviews with staff revealed that R1 was to receive physical therapy through Kaiser Home Health upon admission to the facility. However, facility staff reported that R1 refused physical therapy shortly after. Additionally, interviews with staff revealed that R1 refused to allow Kaiser Hospital Home Health to touch R1 and the physical therapy discontinued. Furthermore, interviews with staff revealed that R1 was ‘cognitive but non-compliant’. Based on interviews, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “staff did not ensure resident received physical therapy”. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was also alleged that staff ordered medical equipment through the resident’s insurance without consent. It was reported that an oxygen machine was ordered for R1 without the approval from R1’s family members. Record review revealed that in the Physician’s Preferred Hospice Care Plan for R1 dated 8/30/2019 to 10/04/2019, the hospice doctor had prescribed under ‘medical equipment’ an A-1 Oxygen machine. Subsequently, through the Hospice Care Plan, the oxygen machine was ordered as it was considered to be necessary for R1’s health. Based on the information and documentation obtained and reviewed, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “staff ordered medical equipment through the resident’s insurance without consent”. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. ...Continued on LIC 9099C... ...Continued from LIC 9099C... Also alleged was facility staff over medicated resident. Review of medical documents revealed that R1’s was admitted to hospice on 8/30/2019 with a primary diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris and other comorbidities which included but not limited to: shortness of breath, wheezing, depression, anxiety, agitation, generalized body weakness, legal blindness, paralysis due to stroke, and DMII with moderate kidney disease stage three. Due to R1’s medical condition, the Hospice Doctor prescribed nine different medications to be taken by R1 once back at the facility. Interviews with staff revealed that R1 was ‘actively declining’. Also, interview with the Hospice Nurse revealed that there were no concerns regarding staff neglecting or abusing R1 as they would have ‘reported it’. Furthermore, the Hospice Nurse reported that staff was attentive and R1 was well cared for. Based on interviews and record review, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “facility staff over medicated resident”. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. No citations issued. A copy of this report has been issued. ...Continued from LIC 9099C... The complaint was referred to Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Christine Ferris on 05/26/2020. Investigator Ferris conducted interviews with staff, residents and witnesses on 07/14/2020, 07/20/2020, 07/26/2020, and 08/05/2020. Investigator Ferris obtained copies of R1’s medical records from Northridge Hospital Medical Center on 06/24/2020; from Kaiser Permanente Panorama City on 06/18/2020; from Physician’s Preferred Hospice Care on 07/14/2020; from Omni Wound Physicians on 07/29/2020; and Astoria Nursing and Rehabilitation Center on 07/30/2020. On 07/15/2019, R1 was admitted to Astoria Skilled Nursing Facility due to multiple falls and non-compliance with medication regimen and home safety recommendations. R1 lived in own home prior to being admitted and refused to transition out of home or hire caregivers. A report for self-neglect was filed for R1 in January 2019 and again on 07/15/2019. R1 was discharged on 08/19/19 with diagnosis of right heel deep tissue injury and admitted to the Granada Golden Years facility. It was noted that Kaiser Hospital Home Health was scheduled to perform physical therapy but R1 refused and physical therapy was discontinued. R1 was not conserved and made own decisions regarding medical care. Information in the Hospice records indicated R1’s start of hospice care was 08/30/2019 and end of care date was 10/04/2019, the day R1 was admitted to the hospital. Hospice nurses provided wound care to R1 every 3 to 4 days. It was also noted that R1’s family were in communication with the hospice agency and aware R1 was receiving hospice services. R1 was given insulin injections daily by a nurse, either hospice or home health, as noted in the medication log from 09/29/2019 to 10/04/2019. The hospice nurse stated that R1 was properly cared for by facility staff as they adhered to the instructions given to care for R1 and communicated well concerning R1’s condition. Information reviewed in the OMNI Wound Physicians report indicated on 09/11/2019, R1 was treated for chronic wound to bilateral posterior heels as R1 was unable to move both lower extremities; left heel, pressure ulcer stage 3-chronic; pressure ulcer stage 4-chronic. A bilateral vascular study of the lower extremity arteries was performed for signs and risk faction of peripheral vascular disease (PVD). ...Continued on LIC 9099C... ...Continued from LIC 9099C... The study indicated non-compressible arteries on both extremities. High complexity, treatment course is prolonged due to sustained inflammation vascular factors immobility. Staging care due to poor wound progression. R1 was seen again on 09/17/2019 where left buttock pressure ulcer stage 3 was added to the diagnoses and treatment plan. R1 was seen again by the wound care nurse on 09/24/2019 and 10/01/2019. On 10/04/2019, R1 was taken to the Northridge Hospital Medical Center Emergency Room due to R1 was noted to have altered mental status. During the ER visit, R1 was diagnosed with severe sepsis, acute parotitis, acute kidney injury, hypernatremia, and acute encephalopathy secondary to metabolic derangement. On 10/04/2019, R1 was transferred from the ER and admitted to Kaiser Permanente Panorama City for assessment. The discharge summary dated 1019/2019, stated R1 was on hospice prior to admission and had a history of stroke, diabetes mellitus type 2, severe malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, and admitted 10/04/2019 for metabolic encephalopathy with severe hypernatremia, dehydration, acute chronic kidney failure, sepsis with MRSA bacteremia likely due to skin/decubitus ulcers and new onset atrial fibrillation. R1 was receiving constant and consistent medical care through hospice services and OMNI Wound Physicians while residing in the facility. Based on the information obtained, the above allegation is deemed Unfounded at this time. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is either false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was reviewed and issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2022 · control 31-AS-20200522145430

3 of 6 beds were occupied at the February 18, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Granada Golden Years Inc., licensed since 2019.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
11
Total complaints
5
Substantiated allegations
5
Type A citations
1
Type B citations
1

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations10
Type B citations10
Substantiated allegations50
Total complaints50

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Granada Golden Years

Is Granada Golden Years licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Granada Golden Years licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Granada Golden Years been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Granada Golden Years still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does Granada Golden Years cost?

$4,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,850–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Granada Golden Years take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Granada Golden Years Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Holy Cross Medical Center is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Granada Golden Years keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Granada Golden Years license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GRANADA GOLDEN YEARS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197609748. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Granada Golden Years Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.3 mi

    Globus Senior Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.4 mi

    Grant Serenity of Granada Hills

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $7,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.3 mi

    Eva's Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.4 mi

    Elysium Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,600

    On the state record

    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.4 mi

    Healthy Life Families

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Granada Hills · 0.4 mi

    Sunny Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
GG

Call Granada Golden Years

Granada Hills · Licensed for 6

(818) 535-9693

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Granada Golden Years

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages