Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Aaa Quality Residential Care FacilityLicense #195850166 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareAaa Quality Residential Care FacilityLicense #195850166 · 7843 Stansbury Ave., Panorama City, CA · (323) 485-4851Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Panorama City/Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility
Map · 7843 Stansbury Ave.

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,200/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (323) 485-4851

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

AQ

Call Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility

Panorama City · Licensed for 6

(323) 485-4851

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Panorama City

Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility

7843 Stansbury Ave., Panorama City, CA 91402 · Licensed since 2021

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,200 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 3 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR ROOM #1.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,200a month to start

Likely $3,450–$5,200

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,200likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,450–$5,200

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,400
$4,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,050–$8,600
$6,700
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,500

$3,000$7,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,750.

  • Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mom and Dads RetreatVan Nuys · 1.6 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Grant Serenity Homes of SF ValleyVan Nuys · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of Sunshine HarmonyArleta · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Blue Horizon EldercareNorth Hollywood · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Blue HorizonNorth Hollywood · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

7843 Stansbury Ave., Panorama City, CA 91402Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama CityHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.7 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #195850166 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 8 of 12 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 4 “Unsubstantiated”.

20261 state visit · 1 document

May 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Licensee Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived to the facility shortly thereafter. The LPA, along with the staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The common area was observed to be clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and purchased on 03/18/2026; fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit KITCHEN: The kitchen/dining area was observed to be clean and propertly furnished. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 107.9-degree Fahrenheit. Medications are located in a locked kitchen cabinet. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with three (3) bedrooms. Bedrooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C… RESTROOMS: Restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. Hot water 106.6-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout the facility restrooms to promote handwashing. There are a washer and dryer located in the staff's restroom. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away in the staff restroom. The first aid kit was observed in the staff’s restroom. OUTDOOR SPACE: The patio has patio furniture and patio umbrella to provide shade for residents’ use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. There are no bodies of water on the premises. RECORDS: Records review began at 12:15 p.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:30 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster - Certificate Of Liability _ Emergency Disaster Plan No deficiencies were cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2026

20254 state visits · 5 documents

Jul 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unstageable pressure injury.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. During today’s visit, LPA Urena met with the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan and explained the reason for the visit. On 01/31/2025, the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional Office (RO) received a complaint alleging facility employees at the AAA Quality Residential Care Facility failed to provide an appropriate level of care to Resident #1 (R1) resulting in R1 developing numerous pressure injuries with one being identified as unstageable. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Douglas Real. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Page 2. On 02/05/2025, from 10:05am to 12:45pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial visit to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA Urena was greeted by staff and informed of the visit. The staff contacted the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan via telephone to inform them of the visit. The Administrator arrived at 10:45am and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. The LPA requested records pertinent to the investigation at 10:55am and interviewed the Administrator from 11:09am to 11:57am. The Administrator was advised that the complaint was referred to the Investigations Branch (IB); however, an IB investigator had not yet been assigned as of the visit date. The LPA determined further investigation was needed prior to issuing findings. On 02/24/2025, at approximately 11:55am, Investigator Real conducted interviews with Kaiser Permanente Hospital Social Worker; on 02/25/2025, from approximately 8:45am to 12:30pm, with County of Los Angeles Deputy Public Guardians; on 03/14/2025, at approximately 11:00am, with facility resident; on 04/15/2025, from approximately 10:00am to 1:00pm, with Staff #1 (S1), Administrator, and facility residents; on 05/22/2025, from approximately 11:45am to 1:15pm, with Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Detective and Sunshine Care Hospice Administrator; and on 05/29/2025, at approximately 12:00pm, with Sunshine Care Hospice Registered Nurse. In addition, Investigator Real reviewed Kaiser Permanente Hospital medical records, Los Angeles Public Guardian (LAPG) conservator court documents, Sunshine Care Hospice Records, and facility file documents related to the investigation. Due to the complaint was not reported to the LAPD as a crime report, a police report was not generated. Therefore, no investigation or interviews were conducted by the LAPD. According to R1’s Physician’s Report, dated 07/29/2024, the report indicated R1 was diagnosed with Type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and dementia. R1 was noted as having lower leg diabetic wounds. R1 was admitted to the facility on 07/30/2024. Continues on LIC 9099C page 3.... Page 3. A review of the Sunshine Care Hospice records revealed on 11/30/2024, R1 was placed on hospice with the primary diagnosis of Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and the Secondary diagnosis as Senile Degeneration of the brain. The hospice certification period was listed as 11/30/2024 to 02/27/2025. Frequency of visits was noted as home aide 2 times per week, LVN 1 time per week, and RN every 2 weeks. The Department’s investigation revealed R1 was under hospice care while residing in the facility and hospice was aware R1’s health was declining. According to R1’s hospice nurse, they saw no evidence to suggest that R1’s decline in health was due to neglect or abuse by the facility and believes R1’s decline was due to advanced dementia and possibly other comorbidities. R1’s hospice nurses instructed the facility caregivers to turn R1 every two hours, and the hospice nurse had no reason to believe the facility staff did not do so. R1 had a very poor appetite and frequently refused to eat or drink. This behavior likely contributed to R1’s skin breakdown leading to the unstageable pressure injury and the beginning of injuries on R1’s feet. Wound care was ordered through hospice to address the skin breakdown issues and an initial wound assessment was done on 01/29/2025, the day prior to R1 being sent to the hospital. The facility staff denied the allegation and reported turning R1 every two hours as instructed by hospice. The information obtained during the Department’s investigation did not sufficiently support the allegation. While R1 did sustain pressure injuries during their stay at the facility, the investigation did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate neglect/lack of care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250131163051
Jul 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted a Case Management - Deficiencies visit due to deficiencies discovered during the investigation of complaint control number # 29-AS-20250131163051. The LPA met with the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan and explained the reason for the visit. During the Department’s investigation of complaint # 29-AS-20250131163051, the following deficiency was observed: The Department’s investigation revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 07/30/2024. The responsible party was listed as “self” and R1 signed the facility admission agreement. R1’s health declined, and on 10/30/2024, R1 was placed on the County of Los Angeles Public Guardian (LAPG) appointed Conservator’s caseload. On 11/14/2024 during a visit to the facility, the LAPG informed the administrator that R1 was under the LAPG and that they were R1’s conservator. On 11/30/2024, R1 was placed on Sunshine Care Hospice. The LAPG was not notified until 01/30/2025. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency is cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87633(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 11, 2025

87633(a)(3) Hospice Care of Terminally Ill Residents (a)The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain residents who have been diagnosed as terminally ill by his or her physician and surgeon …(3) Hospice agency services are contracted for by each terminally ill resident or prospective resident individually, or the resident’s or prospective resident's Health Care Surrogate Decision Maker if the resident or prospective resident is incapacitated, not by the licensee on behalf of a resident or prospective resident. These hospice agency services must be provided by a hospice agency both licensed by the state and certified by the federal Medicare program. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee did not notify R1’s conservator (LAPG) that R1 was placed on hospice, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee will review regulations and will submit letter of acknowledgment to LPA Urena via email.

May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Licensee Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived at the facility shortly thereafter. The LPA, along with the Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and purchased on 05/; fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 107.9-degree Fahrenheit. Medications are located in a locked kitchen cabinet. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with three (3) bedrooms. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C… RESTROOMS: Restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. Hot water= 105.6-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout the facility restrooms to promote handwashing. There is a washer and dryer located in the staff's restroom. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away in the staff restroom. The first aid kit observed in the staff restroom. OUTDOOR SPACE: The patio has patio furniture and patio umbrella to provide shade for residents’ use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. There are no bodies of water on the premises. RECORDS: Records review began at 12:27 p.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:30 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster -Certificate Of Liability No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025
Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff speak inappropriately towards a resident. Staff mishandle a resident's medication. Resident was physically abused while in care. Staff are denying a resident access to food.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted a subsequent visit to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. The LPA was greeted by staff, and called the Administrator.The LPA explained the reason for the visit to the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan and read the report over on the phone. The Administrator allowed the facility staff to sign on the report. On 04/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an initial ten-day visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Urena and the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. No concerns were observed at this time. The LPA interviewed the Administrator, residents and staff from 10:05 a.m. to 01:25 p.m. Requested records pertinent to the investigation. Further investigation is needed at this time.Continues LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Pg. 2 Staff speak inappropriately towards a resident. On the allegation that staff speak inappropriately towards resident, it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that staff speak disrespectfully to residents in care. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted residents’ interviews. The LPA interviewed four (4) out of five (5) residents, one resident was unavailable for the interview. The interviews revealed that staff are never disrespectful, nor do they raise their voices. One resident stated that they thought they heard staff use loud voice but was not sure. Staff denied being disrespectful to residents in care. Based on the information obtained through interviews, the residents stated that staff speaks to them respectfully. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstituted at this time. Staff mishandle a resident's medication. On the allegation that staff mishandle a resident's medication; it is the concern of the reporting party that staff are not dispensing the medications to residents as prescribed (timely). To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted residents’ and staff interviews and conducted a random medication audit of residents’ medications compared to the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (LIC622). The interview with residents revealed that they receive their medications on time and according to their doctor’s orders. The medication audit revealed that the medications selected for audit were accurately dispensed, per physician’s orders. Based on the information obtained through interviews, and medication audit, the residents are receiving their medications according to the physician’s orders. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continues on LIC 9099C pg. 3 Pg. 3 Resident was physically abused while in care. On the allegation that a resident was physically abused while in care; it is the concern of the reporting party that the RP witnessed staff physically abusing an elderly resident. The reporting party did not specify how the physical abuse was being perpetrated, and neither identified the elderly resident. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted residents’ interviews and residents’ representative’s interviews. The interviews revealed that staff have not abused residents physically nor in any other way. Residents are happy with the care they receive from the staff and the Administrator. The LPA interviewed the RP and the RP denied witnessing any physical abuse. Staff denied being physically abusive towards residents in care. The Administrator stated that no concerns or reports of abuse have been brought up by residents or their representatives. Based on the information obtained through interviews, residents reported that they are happy at the facility and denied any staff was physically abusing them. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff are denying a resident access to food. On the allegation that staff are denying a resident access to food, it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that staff are not allowing residents access to the kitchen until after 8:00 a.m. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted residents’ and staff interviews. The residents’ interviews revealed that they receive three meals a day plus they are offered several snacks throughout the day. If they get hungry, they can ask the staff for food. They are never denied food. The staff interviews revealed that they serve breakfast between 8:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. lunch between 12:30 p.m. and 1:00 p.m., snacks in between and dinner at around 5:00 p.m. The LPA interviewed the RP, and the RP recognized that the staff are trying to take care of R1’s health, and that they do not actually deny the food, and is more about the food being consumed late at night. Based on the information obtained through interviews, RP denied being hungry or not having access to food or getting enough food during meals. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250414113412
Feb 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. Facility staff did not arrange transportation for resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted by staff. Staff contacted the Administrator via telephone. The Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived at 10:45 a.m. LPA Urena toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA Urena requested records pertinent to the investigation at 10:50 a.m. and interviewed the resident, Administrator, and staff between 10:25 a.m. to 12:50 p.m. LPA Urena was unable to reach the reporting party (RP), but was able to speak with R1's case worker (CW) from 1:05 p.m. to 1:46 p.m. CW stated that the RP was a temporary employee and is no longer working for the company. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. On the allegation that Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that the resident (R1) was experiencing chest pains and the facility staff failed to observe the changes in condition and did not seek timely medical attention for R1. The interview with R1 revealed that on 02/18/2025 probably after 2:00 p.m. they were feeling fine when they decided to go on a walk in the community, however after some time during the walk they started to feel weak and knowing that the hospital was nearby, they decided to walk themselves to the hospital. At the hospital they were admitted after being diagnosed with pneumonia. R1 stated that the facility Administrator called them and it was at this time that R1 informed the Administrator that they were admitted to the hospital. Interviews with the Administrator and the staff revealed that they did not notice any changes in R1's condition on 02/18/2025. R1 had lunch that day and decided to go on a walk sometime after lunch. R1 had been admitted in the facility two days prior to the incident, and R1 was in good spirits. Based on the information obtained through interviews, the allegation that facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility staff did not arrange transportation for resident in care. On the allegation that the Facility staff did not arrange transportation for resident in care, it is the concern of the RP that R1 was denied transportation to the hospital when they were not feeling well, and consequently R1 had to walk to the hospital. The interview with R1 revealed that on 02/18/2025, at around 2:00 p.m., they told the facility staff, “they were going on a walk”. R1 went stated that during the walk they felt weak. R1 stated that they know the area well and decided to walk to the nearby hospital, which is about 10 minutes of walking distance from the facility. R1 stated that they were confused, and ‘out of it’, when hospital staff interviewed them. R1 denied the statement provided by the RP in the complaint report. The interview with the Administrator revealed that R1 stated that they wanted to go on a walk. The Administrator stated that because R1 had been admitted to the facility only two days before, they were concerned about the walk, however R1 insisted on the walk. Furthermore, the Administrator stated that they told R1 to take the facility’s business card in case they got disoriented or lost and didn’t know how to get back. Per the Administrator R1 has a personal cell phone. The Administrator stated that they called R1 after 15 minutes but R1 did not answer the phone. After an hour passed, the Administrator called R1 again, at this time R1 answered the phone and R1 stated they were admitted to the hospital. The Administrator then informed R1’s emergency contacts that R1 was admitted to the hospital. Continues on pg. 3 Page 3. The LPA spoke with a R1’s case worker (CW) assigned to follow up with R1 for a month after placement at the facility. The CW stated that case notes dated 02/21/2025 indicate that R1 stated that they are happy residing at this facility. Based on the information obtained through record review and interviews, the allegation that facility staff did not arrange transportation for resident in care, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued at this time. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was issued. Facility staff yells at resident in care. On the allegation that the facility staff yells at residents, the interview with the resident (R1), revealed that this allegation is based on different facility where they were previously residing, and that it was a mistake, wrong facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be Unfounded, at this time. Facility staff forces to eat. On the allegation that the facility staff forces residents to eat, the interview with the resident (R1), revealed that this allegation is based on different facility where they were previously residing, and that it was a mistake, wrong facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be Unfounded, at this time. Facility staff forces to take medication. On the allegation that the facility staff forces residents to take medication,the interview with the resident (R1), revealed that this allegation is based on different facility where they were previously residing, and that it was a mistake, wrong facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be Unfounded, at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250219161649

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring resident's hearing aid is replaced. Staff are not providing resident with mail. Staff are not meeting resident's needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 11:00 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 11:27 a.m., the Licensee, Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived at the facility. During the initial visit conducted on 9/14/2023 between 2:15 p.m. and 3:35 p.m., LPA Sandra Urena conducted a physical plant tour and conducted an interview with the Licensee. During the initial visit, the LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, at 11:30 a.m., LPA Peraldi conducted an interview with the Licensee. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff are not ensuring resident's hearing aid is replaced. It was alleged that Resident #1’s (R1’s) hearing aid was not operable, and the Licensee did not assist with replacing the hearing aid. The Licensee stated that she made an appointment for R1 to a hearing center, and the appointment was set for 08/07/2023, but R1 had left to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) in July 2023. R1 did not come back to the facility until 09/02/2023. The Licensee provided the LPA with the appointment card for R1. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not providing resident with mail. It was alleged that the Licensee would not provide R1 with R1’s mail. The Licensee stated that she would give R1’s mail to R1 and that she would keep R1’s mail at the front of the facility for R1. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not meeting resident's needs. It was alleged that R1 was not taken care of properly as R1 developed wounds while in care. Per record review, R1 was admitted to the facility on 05/06/2023 and left around July 2023 and was readmitted on 09/02/2023. R1’s primary diagnosis upon admission per physician report dated 5/4/2023 is listed as severe sepsis, acute chronic renal failure, acute chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation (afib), bilateral pneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R1 also had Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Per physician report dated 5/4/2023, R1 was not on hospice services. R1 did start receiving hospice services on 05/23/2023. Medical records for R1’s hospitalization on 6/27/2023 did not note any pressure ulcers. R1 was at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) from around July 2023 and returned back to the facility on 09/02/2023. The Licensee stated that from the SNF, R1 developed the pressure ulcers. The Licensee stated that she readmitted R1 since R1 would be getting wound care with hospice. Physician report dated on 9/2/2023, noted R1 had pressure ulcers stage 3 and stage 4 on ankles. R1’s physician report dated 9/2/2023, stated that R1 was receiving hospice services. R1’s medical record dated 8/30/2023 stated that R1 had a pressure ulcer on left ankle, stage 4. The LPA called the SNF to confirm that R1 was admitted between July 2023 and September 2023. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 31, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230907155842
Jun 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Licensee Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived at the facility shortly thereafter. The LPA, along with the Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and purchased on 01/19/2024; fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 107.9-degree Fahrenheit. Medications are located in a locked kitchen cabinet. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with three (3) bedrooms. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C… RESTROOMS: Restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. At 12:15 p.m., hot water 105.6-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout the facility restrooms to promote handwashing. There is a washer and dryer located in the staff's restroom. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away in the staff restroom. The first aid kit observed in the staff restroom. OUTDOOR SPACE: The patio has patio furniture and patio umbrella to provide shade for residents’ use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. There are no bodies of water on the premises. RECORDS: Records review began at 12:37 p.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:50 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents

20232 state visits · 2 documents

Jul 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced Case Management - Annual Continuation at the facility today continuing the inspection that began on 06/20/2023. At 11:38 a.m., the Licensee arrived at the facility. At 11:10 a.m., the LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside, with Staff to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. RECORD REVIEW: At 11:40 a.m., the LPA reviewed resident records for the two (2) new residents. All files were in order. Between 11:47 a.m. and 12:30 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with the Licensee for four (4) residents and observed the following: R1’s Aspirin 81 MG had 9 tablets remaining, however the medication was started on 06/16/2023 and the quantity was 15. Pursuant to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations Division 6, Chapter 8 and California Health and Safety Code the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D) Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report of provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2023

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jun 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. At 12:00 p.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for it visit. At 12:27 p.m., the Licensee arrived at the facility. At 12:45 p.m., the LPA, along with the Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. At 1:17 p.m., hot water measured at 106.3-degree Fahrenheit. Medications are located in a locked kitchen cabinet. However, at 12:48 p.m., the LPA observed medication accessible in the refrigerator. The Licensee explained that she will ensure that the medications will be locked and inaccessible. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with three (3) bedrooms and one (1) bathroom for resident's use. There is an additional bedroom for staff use, which remains locked. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. At 12:52 p.m., the LPA observed Resident #1 (R1) residing in room three (3), which is not the identified bedridden room. Per R1’s physician’s report, R1 is identified as bedridden. Per the fire clearance, a bedridden resident can only reside in Bedroom #1. An immediate civil penalty of $500 is assessed, due to a violation of the fire clearance. Continued on LIC 809-C. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. At 1:15 p.m., hot water 105.6-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout the facility restrooms to promote handwashing. There is a washer and dryer located in the staff restroom. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away in the staff restroom. The first aid kit observed in the staff restroom. OUTDOOR SPACE: At 1:20 p.m., the LPA observed the back patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. There are no bodies of water on the premises. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and purchased on 05/21/2023. At 1:18 p.m., fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. RECORD REVIEWS: Between 1:27 p.m. and 2:50 p.m., the LPA conducted a file review for all residents and staff regularly scheduled and observed the following: Staff have current first aid and training documentation showing required training completed. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All files were in order. Pursuant to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations Division 6, Chapter 8 and California Health and Safety Code the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Civil Penalties assessed in the amount of $500. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties Due to time constraints the LPA will return to complete the annual at a later date. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and and appeal rights were issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2023

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20221 state visit · 1 document

May 5, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 1:12 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. LPA was greeted and screened by staff. At 1:35 p.m., the Licensee Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived at the facility. This annual had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. At 1:25 p.m., the LPA, along with staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. KITCHEN: At 1:25 p.m., the LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. At 1:43 p.m., hot water measured at 106.1-degree Fahrenheit. Medications and first aid kits are located in a locked cabinet. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last purchased on 05/05/2022. Flashlights were observed throughout the facility. Upon entry, signs are posted to promote handwashing, cough/sneeze etiquette, and physical distancing. At 1:43 p.m., fire alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C. RESTROOMS: The facility has two restrooms, one for resident use and one for staff use. The resident restroom is relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. The laundry units are located inside the staff restroom which remains locked. At 1:44 p.m., hot water measured at 106.0-degree Fahrenheit. Night lights were present in the hallway. OUTDOOR SPACE: At 1:38 p.m., the LPA observed the backyard, which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There is a gate on the side of the house that is designated for an emergency exit. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. INFECTION CONTROL: During today’s visit, the LPA spoke with the Licensee regarding the facility’s infection control practices. Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and a sanitation station. LPA observed a 30-day supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The facility has not had a confirmed case of COVID-19 at this time; however, the facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. No deficiencies were observed at this time. Exit interview conducted with the Licensee. Report issued and a copy of the report was emailed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2022

20211 state visit · 1 document

Sep 22, 2021Facility evaluation reportPost LicensingDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Post Licensing

At 10:00 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi arrived at the facility to conduct a Post Licensing visit. LPA was greeted and screened by staff Ovsanna Khayalyan. Administrator Elen Kirakosyan was unavailable at the time of the visit and authorized staff Ovsanna Khayalyan to sign the report. At 10:17 a.m. LPA, along with staff, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Today's evaluation included but was not limited to building and grounds, resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, personal accommodations, and food supplies. There is an adequate amount of perishable and nonperishable foods. LPA observed fire extinguisher fully charged and last purchased on 04/30/2021. Centrally stored medicines are kept in a locked kitchen cabinet. First Aid kit is complete. Grab bars and non-skid mats were present in the bathroom. LPA observed appropriate and sufficient lighting in each room. At 10:59 a.m. hot water for the kitchen measured at 105.2-degree Fahrenheit. At 11:00 a.m. hot water for resident restroom measured at 107.3-degree Fahrenheit. Hygiene items are being provided. At 1:59 p.m. the smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested in the common areas and resident bedrooms and they were all operational. LPA observed disaster plan posted near the living room area. LPA observed COVID-19 postings throughout the facility. LPA observed a 30-day supply of PPE. Between 10:27 a.m.- 11:03 a.m. LPA reviewed resident medications and records. One (1) out of two (2) residents records did not have a pre-admission appraisal completed. At 11:33 a.m. LPA reviewed of staff records. The following deficiency was observed (See LIC 809-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Report issued and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87457(c) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 29, 2021

87457Pre-Admission Appraisal - General(c)Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed and shall include an appraisal of his/her individual service needs in comparison... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which 1 out of 2 residents did not have a pre-admission appraisal completed which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to submit a completed appraisal for Resident #1 to LPA by 09/29/2021.

5 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 1, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Aaa Quality Residential Corp., licensed since 2021.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
12
Total complaints
4
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations00
Total complaints40

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility

Is Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility cost?

$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Aaa Quality Residential Corp., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City is 0.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AAA QUALITY RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #195850166. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Aaa Quality Residential Corp., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 27, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Panorama City · 0.1 mi

    Ano One Facility for the Elderly

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,100 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Panorama City · 0.1 mi

    Ano Two Facility for the Elderly

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,100 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Panorama City · 0.4 mi

    Caring Home Assisted Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Van Nuys · 0.5 mi

    Emvy Board and Care Facility

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Panorama City · 0.6 mi

    Valley View Retirement Center

    Large community · licensed for 116

    Estimated starting rate

    $2,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $2,050–$3,400

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
  • Map

    Van Nuys · 0.6 mi

    Golden Bridge Board & Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
AQ

Call Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility

Panorama City · Licensed for 6

(323) 485-4851

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages