Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Ano One Facility for the Elderly

Small home·Licensed for 6·Panorama City, California

Licensed since 2018Licence #197609559Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,000 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,250–$4,900
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 21, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitAugust 14, 2026CDSS inspection record

Ano One Facility for the Elderly is a small care home in Panorama City — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2018. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Ano One Facility for the Elderly

Is Ano One Facility for the Elderly licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Ano One Facility for the Elderly licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Ano One Facility for the Elderly been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Ano One Facility for the Elderly still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Ano One Facility for the Elderly cost?

$4,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,250–$4,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Ano One Facility for the Elderly take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ano One Facility for the Elderly Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Ano One Facility for the Elderly keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Ano One Facility for the Elderly license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANO ONE FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197609559. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ano One Facility for the Elderly Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 6 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ALL MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,000a month to start

Likely $3,250–$4,900

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,000a month

Likely $3,250–$5,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,000likely $3,250–$4,900

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,250–$5,100
$4,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,850–$8,300
$6,000
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,600.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7907 Stansbury, Panorama City, CA 91402Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2018. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 14, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
10
Most recent visit
August 14, 2026
Occupied · July 21, 2026 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 28, 2023 to July 21, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020251102024110202323120221102021110

The last 36 months — 6 of 9 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator arrived at the facility shortly thereafter. The LPA and Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The common area was observed to be relatively clean and properly furnished. All required postings were observed. Exits have functioning auditory devices. The fire alarm/ carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Medications and first aid kits are located in a locked hallway closet. The LPA observed cameras in the common areas, and throughout the exterior perimeter of the facility. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 118.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away inside a kitchen cabinet, and a hallway closet. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last serviced on . BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with four (4) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms for resident's use. The LPA observed residents’ bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C… RESTROOMS: Three (3) restrooms were observed to be relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Water temperature measured at 116.8-degree Fahrenheit. OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the back patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. The facility has an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) at the back of the facility and is not part of the license. The ADU remains inaccessible to residents. RECORDS: Records review began at 12:15 p.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:15 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet located inside the locked linen closet; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2026
Jul 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an initial unannounced visit to investigate the allegation listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator Artur Atoyan and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Urena, along with the Administrator, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA Urena interviewed staff and residents at approximately 11:30 a.m. and reviewed records pertinent to the investigation. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care. On the allegation that facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care, it is alleged that facility staff told a resident to “go back into their room” after the resident had been standing in the hallway for approximately 10 minutes. To investigate the allegation LPA Urena interviewed the residents, staff and the Administrator. The residents reported that they are well taken care of by facility staff and staff have never been disrespectful. Furthermore, the residents reported that they can always be out of their room and anywhere they want in the facility without anyone telling them they can’t be there. The staff stated that they are always respectful towards residents. The Administrator stated staff are always respectful and would never tell residents that they are not allowed in the common areas of the facility. Based on the information received through the interviews there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260716140008
20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator arrived at the facility shortly thereafter. The LPA and Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. All required postings were observed. Exits have functioning auditory devices. The fire alarm/ carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Medications and first aid kits are located in a locked hallway closet. The LPA observed cameras in the common areas, and throughout the exterior perimeter of the facility. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 118.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away inside a kitchen cabinet, and a hallway closet. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last serviced on 07/15/2025. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with four (4) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms for resident's use. The LPA observed residents’ bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C… RESTROOMS: Three restrooms were observed to be relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Water temperature measured at 116.8-degree Fahrenheit. OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the back patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. The facility has an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) at the back of the facility and is not part of the license. The ADU remains inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster Due to time constraints, a continuation inspection is required. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator arrived at the facility shortly thereafter. The LPA and Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. All required postings were observed. Exits have functioning auditory devices. The fire alarm/ carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Medications and first aid kits are located in a locked hallway closet. The LPA observed cameras in the common areas, and throughout the exterior perimeter of the facility. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 118.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away inside a kitchen cabinet, and a hallway closet. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last serviced on 06/02/2024. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with four (4) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms for resident's use. The LPA observed residents’ bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C… RESTROOMS: Three restrooms were observed to be relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Water temperature measured at 116.8-degree Fahrenheit. OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the back patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. The facility has an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) at the back of the facility and is not part of the license. The ADU remains inaccessible to residents. RECORDS: Records review began at 12:15 p.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:15 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet located inside the locked linen closet; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 23, 2024
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to administer resident’s medication as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi, conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings at this facility. At 1:30 p.m., the LPA met with Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit on 08/17/2021, between 11:25 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., LPA Peraldi toured the facility, reviewed resident records and medications. During a subsequent visit, on 08/25/2021 between 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., LPA Peraldi and LPA Ashley Smith toured the facility, interviewed four (4) staff, including the Administrator, reviewed records and medications. During a subsequent visit on 05/19/2023 between 12:30 p.m. and 1:45 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a brief physical plant tout, conducted interviews with four (4) out of five (5) residents and with one (1) staff. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Substantiated Regarding the allegations: Staff failed to administer resident’s medication as prescribed. It was alleged that staff failed to properly assist residents with the self-administration of medication as prescribed. During a subsequent visit, LPAs Peraldi and Smith conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with the Administrators and observed the following: Resident #2’s (R2’s) Carbidopa-Levodopa (sp) per directions from physician, was to be administered four (4) times a day. However, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) confirmed that the Administrators were assisting with the self-administration of this medication three (3) times a day. The Administrators explained that R2 would refuse one (1) tablet of the medication and would only take the medication three (3) times a day. Based on the observation and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations Division 6, Chapter 8, and California Health and Safety Code the following deficiency were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalty. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. Regarding the allegations: Staff neglect resulting in resident's poor hygiene. Staff are not meeting residents’ incontinence needs. It was alleged that staff neglected Resident #1 (R1) hygiene and are not meeting R1’s incontinence needs. Interviews with staff revealed that residents, including R1 are bathed twice a week. Interviews with staff revealed that majority of residents wear diapers and that staff change resident’s diapers two (2) to three (3) times a day. Interview with Administrator revealed that R1 has a catheter and that R1 is on Home Health services. R1’s Home Health continues to monitor R1’s catheter and staff continue to tend to R1’s catheter within the scope of their care. During the physical plant tour on 8/17/2021, 08/25/2021 and 05/19/2023, residents appeared well groomed. The LPA’s did not smell any odors nor did residents indicate that staff are neglectful. Additionally, resident interviews did not reveal any issues with their incontinence needs. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff failed to assist residents with diabetes care. It was alleged that staff failed to assist residents with diabetes care. During the interview with the Administrator, it was revealed that two (2) out of five (5) residents, including R1 require assistance with diabetes care. The Administrator stated that staff supervise and assist the two residents with their diabetes care, including blood sugar check. The Administrator stated that the two residents can inject the insulin pen on their own. Interviews with residents did not reveal any issues with staff neglect towards diabetes care. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210809155552

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 29, 2023

87465 (a) (4) Incidental Medical and Dental Care...(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R2’s medication of Carbidopa-Levodopa (sp) was not being assisted per directions from physician which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023

Plan of correction: Within 24 hours, the Licensee will notify LPA when training will be completed. Licensee agreed to do a complete medication audit for the facility and training for all medication staff and submit documentation to CCL.

Sep 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced Case Management - Annual Continuation at the facility today continuing the inspection that began on 08/16/2023. At 9:30 a.m., the LPA met with the Administrators and explained the reason for the visit. RECORD REVIEW: Between 9:45 a.m. to 11:10 a.m., the LPA reviewed resident records for five (5) out of five (5) residents. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, and consent forms. All files were in order. The LPA conducted a personnel file review for all staff regularly scheduled and reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were in order. At 3:00 p.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with the Administrator for five (5) residents and observed that all medications were properly documented. Copy of valid liability insurance and Facility Emergency Plan was provided to the LPA during the visit. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report of provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County