Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Ano Two Facility for the Elderly

Small home·Licensed for 6·Panorama City, California

Licensed since 2018Licence #197609553Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,000 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,250–$4,900
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedJune 26, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitAugust 18, 2026CDSS inspection record

Ano Two Facility for the Elderly is a small care home in Panorama City — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2018. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Ano Two Facility for the Elderly

Is Ano Two Facility for the Elderly licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Ano Two Facility for the Elderly licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Ano Two Facility for the Elderly been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Ano Two Facility for the Elderly still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Ano Two Facility for the Elderly cost?

$4,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,250–$4,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Ano Two Facility for the Elderly take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ano Two Facility for the Elderly Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Ano Two Facility for the Elderly keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Ano Two Facility for the Elderly license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANO TWO FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197609553. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ano Two Facility for the Elderly Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 6 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, ALL OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,000a month to start

Likely $3,250–$4,900

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,000a month

Likely $3,250–$5,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,000likely $3,250–$4,900

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,250–$5,100
$4,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,850–$8,300
$6,000
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,600.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7905 Stansbury, Panorama City, CA 91402Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2018. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 18, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
7
Most recent visit
August 18, 2026
Occupied · June 26, 2026 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated June 26, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020251102024110202322020221102021110

The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with the Administrators Nektar Chamchyan, and Artur Atoyan and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA, along with the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last serviced on 07/03/2026. Exits have functioning auditory devices. The fire alarm/ carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed cameras in the common areas, and throughout the exterior perimeter of the facility. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 115.3-degree Fahrenheit. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away inside a kitchen cabinet. Medications are located in a locked cabinet next to the refrigerator. Continued on LIC 809-C… BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story facility with three (3) bedrooms for resident use and one (1) office. There are two (2) bathrooms, one (1) bathroom is used for staff only and the other one is for residents' use. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. Hot water measured at 116.1-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the front patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. The facility has an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) at the back of the facility and is not part of the license. The ADU remains inaccessible to residents. Laundry units are located in a laundry room area, where two washers and two dryers were observed. The laundry room is kept locked with a key. RECORDS: Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications are located in a locked cabinet next to the refrigerator.; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2026
Jun 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed multiple pressure injures due to neglect by staff. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident in care.

On 06/26/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. The LPA was greeted by staff and contacted the Administrator on the phone. The LPA spoke with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator stated they were out shopping and agreed to have the LPA read the report over the phone and have facility representative sign the report. On 07/31/2025, the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint about the allegations listed above. On 07/31/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the allegations. LPA Urena conducted an initial investigation and interviewed the Administrator, staff and R1 from approximately 1:42 p.m. to 2:55 p.m., and requested records pertinent to the investigation. Continues on LIC9099C 2... Unsubstantiated Pg 2. Resident developed multiple pressure injuries due to neglect by staff. On the allegation that Resident #1 (R1) developed multiple pressure injuries while in care due to negligent staff, it is the concern of the Reporting Party (RP) that R1 was observed to have various pressure injuries: Stage 3 and Stage 4 pressure injuries located in the areas of the left ankle, middle of the foot, and various stage pressure wounds of the left elbow, in-between the second and third toe of the right foot and the coccyx area due to staff neglect. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted interviews and record review. The LPA interviewed the Administrator about the pressure wounds, and the Administrator reported that R1 was admitted to the facility on 10/01/2024 with wound care and was receiving wound care from a Skill Nursing Facility (SNF) prior to admission and has continued to receive wound care from the Hospice and Home Health providers through the resident’s health provider, Kaiser Permanente. Staff’s interview revealed that they assisted R1 with repositioning throughout the day, keeping them clean and dry, and following Home Health nurse instructions. LPA Urena interviewed R1, and R1’s interview revealed that R1 is alert and oriented; R1 was able to understand and answer the LPA’s questions. R1 reported to be receiving very good care from staff. Staff assist with repositioning, incontinent care and transfer from bed to wheelchair, and staff take R1 to the backyard for fresh air as weather permits. Furthermore, R1 reported having a nurse who attends to their skin issues. LPA Urena interviewed the responsible party for R1, and the responsible party reported that R1 had developed pressure wounds before being admitted to the facility on 10/01/2024, however, the responsible party could not provide the stage of the pressure wounds, or location of the wounds. Furthermore, the responsible party reported that R1 has been receiving continuous wound care at the facility at least two times per week and has received wound assessments several times. Responsible party added that R1 was receiving good care at the facility and was informed anytime that R1 had a change in condition. Residents’ interviews revealed that staff take care of their needs and are responsive when the residents have a change in condition. LPA Urena conducted record review of documents pertaining to the investigation: Record review of Radiant Hospice Care Inc. (RHC) indicates that R1’s Effective Date of Certification was 09/21/2024 to 11/19/2024. Effective Date of Service was 10/03/2024. Certification was based on face-to-face encounter conducted on 07/23/2024. Plan of Care indicates that RHC was providing care to R1 for Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, resident is non-ambulatory and spends most of their time laying down due to generalized body weakness. Continues on LIC 9099C3... Pg.3 Record review indicates that on 10/25/2024, R1 was admitted to the Kaiser Permanente Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Grand Valley Health Care and was discharged back to facility on 11/03/2024. Discharge instructions from SNF indicated that R1 would be evaluated through Home Health Nursing for medication compliance, diabetic education, and wound care. Skin & Body Assessment graph indicates chronic ulcer of the left ankle, and sacrum redness. Record review of three (3) Wound Healing Care Specialists Agency-Progress Notes dated 05/19/2025, 05/26/2025 and 06/02/2025, indicated that R1 received wound care for left plantar foot (Arterial Ulcer with unspecified severity); and left great toe (Arterial Ulcer with unspecified severity). Treatment Start Date: 04/15/2025. Assessment-Chronic comorbid conditions: Healing is delayed due to advanced age, fragile skin, immobility or limited mobility, medical comorbidities, paralysis, and integumentary failure. Staff were instructed on pressure reliving measures, such as repositioning every two hours, use of float heels, to pad bony areas, and to keep skin clean and dry. Record review of Physician’s Report dated 06/02/2025, indicated that R1 had a history of skin breakdown, and was receiving hospice services for terminal illness (heart disease). Record review of CALWOUND-Wound Assessments dated 05/02/2025; 05/09/2025; 05/16/2025; 06/20/2025; and 07/18/2025. Wound assessment indicated that R1 was assessed for five wounds-Wound #1: Right foot/medial as resolved. Wound #2: Left foot lateral,-non-pressure, full thickness, with bony prominence. Wound #3: Left lateral ankle, as resolved. Wound #4: Left elbow as resolved. Wound #5: Left foot medial aspect, non-pressure, full thickness, necrotic, erythema, with bony prominence. Frequency of Dressing changes: three times per week. Nursing to continue planned visits two times per week for wound care. Record review of Mobile Rapid Recovery -Visit Reports dated 06/04/2025, an initial wound care evaluation was done. On 06/11/2025, and 06/18/2025, indicated that R1 presented with two wounds: Left lateral foot is a chronic diabetic ulcer and received status of Not Healed, and Left medial foot is a chronic diabetic ulcer and received status of Not Healed. On 06/11/2025, Follow up wound care: both wounds have decreased in size. Wound provider to continue care once a week. Barriers to healing: Diabetes and impaired mobility, decreased appetite/poor nutrition intake. Visit Report dated 06/18/2025, indicated that caregivers were expected to apply Sanytl Ointment (prescription medication) to the pressure wounds and do wound dressing daily. (Administrators and caregivers denied doing this type of wound care.) Continues on LIC 9099C4... Pg.4 Record review of three Progress Notes for Wound Wagon -Mobile Wound Care, dated 06/29/2025, 07/06/2025, and 07/19/2025 indicated the following: Records dated on 06/29/2025, indicated treatment for Diabetic Ulcers of the left great toe, foot; and left lateral foot, furthermore it indicated that “both wounds are healing well with no signs of infection”. Furthermore, records dated 07/06/2025, indicated that “week two of amniotic tissue XCell Matrix Amino-both wounds are healing well, with left lateral foot showing especially notable improvement in size and reduction, tissue quality, absence of infection.” Record review of Kaiser Permanente Records dated 07/25/2025 to 07/26/2025 indicated that R1 was admitted to the hospital for the following diagnosis: Gallstone pancreatis, urinary tract infection (UTI), acute kidney injury, incidental adnexal mass. R1 was discharged to facility with care instructions, and home health care services. Record review of CVH Care/Oasis dated 07/28/2025, indicated that R1 was assessed and found to have a Stage IV, left medial foot pressure wound, and a Stage III, left lateral foot pressure wound, and a Stage I, left elbow pressure wound. The information obtained through records review indicates that R1 had a history of skin breakdown, R1 was non-ambulatory and spent most of their time laying down due to generalized body weakness, and on 10/25/2024, R1 developed the first signs of pressure wounds. Furthermore, record review indicates that R1’s healing was delayed due to advanced age, fragile skin, immobility or limited mobility, medical comorbidities, paralysis, and integumentary failure, and poor nutrition intake. Records review indicate that staff received education on wound care on pressure reliving measures, such as repositioning every two hours, using float heels, padding bony areas, and keeping skin clean and dry. Interviews revealed that staff provided repositioning and pressure wound preventive care, and that facility staff followed the care plan. Therefore, the allegation that the resident developed multiple pressure injuries due to neglect by staff is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continues 0n LIC 9099C5... Pg. 5 Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident in care. It is alleged that the facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for R1, for a stage 4 pressure injury, which appeared to have started as a deep tissue injury, and which had deteriorated with purple/red moist base and palpable bone. LPA Urena conducted record review and conducted interviews to investigate the allegation. The record review indicated that the resident was receiving on-going wound care from home health, and hospice agencies. Furthermore, record review indicated that every time the resident had a change in condition, staff would seek timely care for the resident by informing the resident’s responsible party and getting appropriate medical care for the resident. Interview with the resident’s responsible party indicated that the facility is in contact with them often, and facility staff reports changes in resident’s condition. Based on the information obtained through record review and interviews, the allegation that staff did not seek timely medical attention for the resident in care, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2026 · control 29-AS-20250731084950
20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with the Administrators Nektar Chamchyan, and Artur Atoyan and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA, along with the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last serviced on 07/17/2025. Exits have functioning auditory devices. The fire alarm/ carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed cameras in the common areas, and throughout the exterior perimeter of the facility. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 110.5-degree Fahrenheit. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away inside a kitchen cabinet. Medications are located in a locked cabinet next to the refrigerator. Continued on LIC 809-C… BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story facility with three (3) bedrooms for resident use and one (1) office. There are two (2) bathrooms, one (1) bathroom is used for staff only and the other one is for residents' use. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. Hot water measured at 106.1-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the front patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. The facility has an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) at the back of the facility and is not part of the license. The ADU remains inaccessible to residents. Laundry units are located in a laundry room area, where two washers and two dryers were observed. The laundry room is kept locked with a key. RECORDS: Records review began at 10:45 a.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:15 p.m.; Medications are located in a locked cabinet next to the refrigerator.; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with the Administrators Nektar Chamchyan, and Artur Atoyan and explained the reason for the visit. At the time of the annual inspection, the facility has one resident. However, the resident is currently at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) receiving physical therapy and is expected to be back in a couple of weeks, depending on the progress done at the SNF. The LPA, along with the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last serviced on 07/02/2024. Exits have functioning auditory devices. The fire alarm/ carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed cameras in the common areas, and throughout the exterior perimeter of the facility. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 110.5-degree Fahrenheit. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away inside a kitchen cabinet. Medications are located in a locked cabinet next to the refrigerator. Continued on LIC 809-C… BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story facility with three (3) bedrooms for resident use and one (1) office. There are two (2) bathrooms, one (1) bathroom is used for staff only and the other one is for residents' use. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. Hot water measured at 106.1-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the front patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. The facility has an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) at the back of the facility and is not part of the license. The ADU remains inaccessible to residents. Laundry units are located in a laundry room area, where two washers and two dryers were observed. The laundry room is kept locked with a key. RECORDS: Records review began at 12:45 p.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:15 p.m.; Medications are located in a locked cabinet next to the refrigerator.; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced Case Management - Annual Continuation at the facility today continuing the inspection that began on 08/23/2023. At 9:30 a.m., the LPA met with the Administrators and explained the reason for the visit. RECORD REVIEW: At 10:20 a.m., the LPA reviewed resident records for two (2) out of two (2) residents. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, and consent forms. All files were in order. At 11:15 a.m., the LPA conducted a personnel file review for all staff regularly scheduled and reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were in order. At 2:48 p.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with the Administrator for two (2) residents and observed that all medications were properly documented. Copy of valid liability insurance and Facility Emergency Plan was provided to the LPA during the visit. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report of provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County