Stonehaven Senior Living

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Allegation investigated: Staff disturbing resident’s sleep.

On 5/22/2026, Licensing Program Analyst M. Medina and Licensing Program Manager S. Moua met with the facility licensee and administrator. Finding was delivered for the above allegation. The Department conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on the interviews conducted and records reviewed, staff conduct 2-hour checks on the residents to provide care and supervision. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were issued. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of report provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251216125900

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure medications are being dispensed as prescribed Staff did not ensure resident records were updated in a timely manner

On 4/17/1026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Administrator to conduct complaint visit. During complaint visit, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews and gathered documentation. The information obtained during interviews states that Resident 1 (R1) was prescribed medication and that the medication was not administered when received. There are fax records documenting a physician order but it does not indicate who it was faxed to and the time stamp information for the fax is prior to when ordered by the physician, the medication for R1 had not been received by facility. Although the allegation may have happened, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and copy of report this report was provided for facility recordthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260115134506

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not meeting resident care needs Staff did not assist resident with medical appointments

On 4/17/1026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Administrator to conduct complaint visit. During complaint visit, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews and gathered documentation. During interviews and review of documentation, the facility assists R1 with arranging a third party service to transport Resident 1 (R1) to and from scheduled appointments. Additional information obtained during interviews states that R1 had not missed any appointments but agency could not provide written record of appointment schedule without a supoena. During record review and interviews, it was disclosed that R1 had been out of facility on two separate occasions for illness and treated at an area hospital. During the first hospital visit R1 was out of the facility for two days and during the subsequent hospital visit R1 was treated and then transferred to a skilled nuthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260203112430

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer medication to a resident in care

On 4/17/1026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Administrator to conduct complaint visit. During complaint visit, LPA toured facility, conducted interviews and gathered documentation. Medication for R1, was called into pharmacy and was awaiting approval from doctor. Per interviews, R1's physician did not provide refills on medication for R1. R1's physician had limited availability on Tuesday and Thursday, and open only during morning hours. R1 has recently changed their primary physician. Although the allegation may have happened, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and copy of report this report was provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260413092203

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Allegation investigated: Staff is not allowing resident to return to the facility

On 3/18/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Mike Salway, CEO and Radhika Jawa, Assistant Administrator to conduct visit. During the course of the investigation, information was gathered, documents were reviewed, and interviews conducted. Based on information gathered during interviews and review of documentation, there was information on discharge paperwork that the physician ordered skilled nursing for rehabilitation prior to return to community. This Department has found that the above allegations is UNFOUNDED, meaning they were false, could not have happened, and/or were without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260313112421

Allegation investigated: Staff forged a resident's signature

On 3/18/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent complaint visit to gather additional information and deliveri findings for complaint. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, gathered information and toured facility. Based on information gathered during interviews and documentation reviewed, Resident (1) provided paperwork to LPA with their signature on a form and stated that they had not signed it. During an internal investigation conducted by facility after initial complaint visit on 2/23/2026, it was determined that a former staff who was working on special project, which included all resident's medical assessments faxed over a signed document to R1's physician, which R1 did not sign. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited on the attached 9099-D. Exit interview conductthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260219132210

Allegation investigated: Staff are not administering resident's medication in a timely manner Staff engaged in a verbal altercation with residents

On 3/18/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted a subsequent complaint visit to gather additional information and deliver findings for complaint. LPA met with Mike Salway, CEO and Radhika Jawa, Assistant Administrator to conduct visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, gathered information, reviewed documentation and toured facility. Based on information gathered during interviews and documentation reviewed, there is no documentation on medication administration records that R1 did not receive medication as prescribed by physician or that staff engaged in a verbal altercation with residents. The department has insufficient information regarding the above allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegations occurred therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260108144909

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a severe fracture due to staff neglect Staff did not assist resident after a fall Staff made inappropriate comments towards residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Radhika Jewa. LPA's explained the purpose of the visit. Staff Radhika Jewa contacted Consultant Jaycee Sanderson who responded to assist with the visit. LPA's reviewed records. LPA's interviewed staff and residents. Based on interviews and records review, it was undetermined if a resident sustained a severe fracture due to staff neglect. Based on interviews, LPA's received conflicting statements regarding R2's fall. It is undetermined if staff did not assist resident after a fall. Based on interviews, it is undetermined if staff made inappropriate comments towards residents. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250922144728

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.