Westmont Of Fresno is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fresno, Fresno County, California — state license #107208908, licensed for 155 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 48 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 19, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

53 homes in view

Westmont Of Fresno

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 155 residents · Fresno, CA · Fresno County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #107208908, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7442 & 7468 N Millbrook Ave · Fresno, Fresno County
Phone
(559) 446-1266
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 95 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 7442 N MILLBROOK AVE APPROVED FOR 95 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 7468 N MILLBROOK AVE APPROVED FOR 60 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 59 times and filed 48 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 19, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 19, 2026
Occupancy at the August 1, 2024 visit
107 of 155 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 14, 2021 to August 1, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (18). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 27 of 48 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20249 state visits · 12 documents
Oct 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow infection control practices Staff did not follow reporting requirements

On 08/01/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not follow infection control practices, Staff did not follow reporting requirements . During complaint investigation the department reviewed facility files, interviewed facility staff and the Administrator. Based of files review, interview and observation no reports of not following infection control and not following reporting requirements observed during the visit on 3/22/24 and 08/01/24. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240321131338
Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not prevent spread of scabies amongst residents and staff.

On 04/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Facility staff did not prevent spread of scabies amongst residents and staff. During this investigation LPA reviewed facility files, interview facility staff and medical personnel. Based of interviews, and records review no staff or residents contracted scabies. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided for facility record. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240205113233
Apr 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident receives contracted services. Staff do not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. Staff do not assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. Staff do not adequately monitor facility entrance doors.

On 04/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident receives contracted services. During this investigation LPA reviewed resident’s files, interview facility staff and resident. Based off file review resident receives contracted services including ADA accommodation of no charge. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Report continues on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240126153840
Mar 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility door locks are in good repair.

On 3/22/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff does not ensure facility door locks are in good repair. During complaint investigation the department interviewed facility staff and the Administrator. Based off of observations, the Administrator, staff, and residents interviews the facility door locks are in good repair. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240221091513
Mar 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medication to resident in a timely manner.

On 3/13/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not dispense medication to resident in a timely manner. During complaint investigation the department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and the Administrator. Based off of facility records review medication administration to R1 as prescribed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231212143827
Feb 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for residents with scabies.

On 2/23/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention for residents with scabies. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and Administrator. The facility addressed scabies by notifying medical and administering medicine to residents effected. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231130115026
Feb 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are allowing residents to share hygiene products Staff are allowing the residents to share clothes while in care Staff are disclosing the residents personal information Staff are not providing adequate supervision to the residents while in care

On 2/01/24, LPA Gorban visited the facility to deliver the findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured facility inside and pout and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed finding with the AD. Allegations: Staff are allowing residents to share hygiene products. Staff are allowing the residents to share clothes while in care. Staff are disclosing the residents personal information. Staff are not providing adequate supervision to the residents while in care. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and Administrator. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on LIC9099-A Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231103105434
Feb 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident for assistance. Staff made inappropriate comment in presence of resident.

On 1/27/24, LPA Gorban visited the facility to deliver the findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured facility inside and pout and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed finding with the Administrator. Allegations: Staff did not respond to resident for assistance, Staff made inappropriate comment in presence of residents. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and Administrator. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted report signed and copy of this report provided to Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231106100715
20232 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have an administrator.

On 11/07/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited the facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Business Office Director Jennifer Fowler, explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Patrick Frazier was notified of licensing visit. LPA toured the facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegations. Allegation: facility does not have an administrator. During this investigation department reviewed facility file and interviewed administrator and staff. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided for facility records. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230915102336
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility alarm is in disrepair

On 9/28/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Jennifer Fowler explained the purpose of the visit and discussed findings. Allegation: Facility alarm is in disrepair During complaint investigation LPA tested facility alarm and appears is operational. LPA reviewed facility files and interviewed staff. Although the allegation “Facility alarm is in disrepair” may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy provided to AD for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230711084903
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair. Staff did not ensure that a resident's room is maintained at a comfortable temperature.

On 9/28/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Jennifer Fowler explained the purpose of the visit and discussed findings. Allegation: Facility is in disrepair. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that a resident's room is maintained at a comfortable temperature. During this investigation LPA observed facility, reviewed history files, facility files, and interviewed facility staff. Based on investigation listed above these allegations are Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and provided to AD for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230705085754
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints14typical 2
Total complaints32typical 7
State visits on file59typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263402025680202491202023791202291542021221
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Fresno County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (559) 446-1266

Is Westmont Of Fresno licensed?

Yes — Westmont Of Fresno is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fresno (Fresno County): California license #107208908, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 155 residents. State records list 48 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 19, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Westmont Of Fresno care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Westmont Of Fresno with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 7442 N MILLBROOK AVE APPROVED FOR 95 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 7468 N MILLBROOK AVE APPROVED FOR 60 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Westmont Of Fresno cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Westmont Of Fresno's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Fresno County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Westmont Of Fresno accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Westmont Of Fresno through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Fresno County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

107 of 155 beds occupied (69%) when the state visited on August 1, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Westmont Of Fresno?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 59 state visits and 48 dated documents since 2021 for Westmont Of Fresno; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 1, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow infection control practices Staff did not follow reporting requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/01/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not follow infection control practices, Staff did not follow reporting requirements . During complaint investigation the department reviewed facility files, interviewed facility staff and the Administrator. Based of files review, interview and observation no reports of not following infection control and not following reporting requirements observed during the visit on 3/22/24 and 08/01/24. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conductedCDSS inspection report, August 1, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240321131338
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not prevent spread of scabies amongst residents and staff.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Facility staff did not prevent spread of scabies amongst residents and staff. During this investigation LPA reviewed facility files, interview facility staff and medical personnel. Based of interviews, and records review no staff or residents contracted scabies. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided for facility record. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240205113233
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure resident receives contracted services. Staff do not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. Staff do not assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. Staff do not adequately monitor facility entrance doors.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident receives contracted services. During this investigation LPA reviewed resident’s files, interview facility staff and resident. Based off file review resident receives contracted services including ADA accommodation of no charge. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Report continues on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240126153840
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure facility door locks are in good repair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 3/22/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff does not ensure facility door locks are in good repair. During complaint investigation the department interviewed facility staff and the Administrator. Based off of observations, the Administrator, staff, and residents interviews the facility door locks are in good repair. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240221091513
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not dispense medication to resident in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 3/13/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not dispense medication to resident in a timely manner. During complaint investigation the department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and the Administrator. Based off of facility records review medication administration to R1 as prescribed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 13, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231212143827
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for residents with scabies.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/23/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention for residents with scabies. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and Administrator. The facility addressed scabies by notifying medical and administering medicine to residents effected. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 23, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231130115026
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are allowing residents to share hygiene products Staff are allowing the residents to share clothes while in care Staff are disclosing the residents personal information Staff are not providing adequate supervision to the residents while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/01/24, LPA Gorban visited the facility to deliver the findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured facility inside and pout and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed finding with the AD. Allegations: Staff are allowing residents to share hygiene products. Staff are allowing the residents to share clothes while in care. Staff are disclosing the residents personal information. Staff are not providing adequate supervision to the residents while in care. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and Administrator. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on LIC9099-A UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231103105434
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to resident for assistance. Staff made inappropriate comment in presence of resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/27/24, LPA Gorban visited the facility to deliver the findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured facility inside and pout and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed finding with the Administrator. Allegations: Staff did not respond to resident for assistance, Staff made inappropriate comment in presence of residents. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and Administrator. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted report signed and copy of this report provided to Administrator for facility records. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231106100715

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have an administrator.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 11/07/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited the facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Business Office Director Jennifer Fowler, explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Patrick Frazier was notified of licensing visit. LPA toured the facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegations. Allegation: facility does not have an administrator. During this investigation department reviewed facility file and interviewed administrator and staff. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided for facility records. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, November 7, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230915102336
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility alarm is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/28/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Jennifer Fowler explained the purpose of the visit and discussed findings. Allegation: Facility alarm is in disrepair During complaint investigation LPA tested facility alarm and appears is operational. LPA reviewed facility files and interviewed staff. Although the allegation “Facility alarm is in disrepair” may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy provided to AD for facility records. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230711084903
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair. Staff did not ensure that a resident's room is maintained at a comfortable temperature.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/28/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Jennifer Fowler explained the purpose of the visit and discussed findings. Allegation: Facility is in disrepair. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that a resident's room is maintained at a comfortable temperature. During this investigation LPA observed facility, reviewed history files, facility files, and interviewed facility staff. Based on investigation listed above these allegations are Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and provided to AD for facility records. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230705085754
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not dispense medication as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 7/05/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted the subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA met with Michelle Gonzalez, Residential Services Director (RSD), explained the purpose of the visit, and discussed allegation findings. Administrator Erik Schuk was not available. Allegation: Facility staff did not dispense medication as prescribed During the course of investigation of this complaint LPA interviewed facility staff, obtained and reviewed facility records. Medication was not provided to resident as prescribed. Facility file had medication on record but was not provided to R1 as prescribed. Based on observations, interviews which were conducted, and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted with RSD. Copy of this report signedCDSS inspection report, July 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230404100407
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not assist resident in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This document is amended of the original report. On 7/05/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted the subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA met with Residents Services Director (RSD), Michelle Gonzalez, explained the purpose of the visit and discussed allegation findings. Administrator Erik Schuk was not available. Allegation: Facility staff did not assist resident in a timely manner During the course of investigation, observation, records reviews and interviews, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with RSD. Copy of this report signed and provided for facility records. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230404100407
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have adequate staff to meet the needs of the residents Facility staff are not properly handling resident's medications.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 06/08/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gorban arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and was greeted by receptionist. LPA requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA toured facility, reviewed residents’ records, observed residents in common area. LPA discussed finding with Administrator Erik Schuk. Allegation: Facility does not have adequate staff to meet the needs of the residents. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. During LPAs visit, based on observation facility had substantial number of staff. Based on records review and facility provided proof of medications, elderly and dementia training, the allegation: Facility does not have adequate staff to meet the needs of the residents is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove tCDSS inspection report, June 8, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230321164409

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to egress alarm timely, resulting in resident exiting memory care, falling and sustaining an injury
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/3/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Erik Schuck During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a facility tour, interviewed staff, and reviewed records. Based on interviews and records review, staff did not respond timely to the egress alarm, resulting in R1 exiting the facility, falling, and sustaining a head injury requiring that medical attention be sought. Review of the facility Alarm Event Report indicates that staff responded to the egress alarm approximately 34 minutes later. Based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation: Staff did not respond to egress alarm timely, resulting in resident exiting memory care, falling and sustaining an injury is SUBSTANTIATED. CONTINUED TO 9099C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220729113420
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's room has a foul odor. Resident's closet is cluttered with soiled linens. Resident's bathroom is unkempt Resident was left unattended. Resident's bathroom is dirty. Staff did not transport resident to medical appointment in a timely manner. Unqualified staff providing transportation for resident's. Facility not properly managing resident's medications. Facility did not seek medical care for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/08/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator Erik Schuk. Today’s visit included staff interviews. During the investigation, LPA reviewed resident records, interviewed staff and residents, and conducted a facility tour. During the facility tour LPA observed residents’ apartments to be clean with no obstructions to pathways. LPA observed residents’ bathrooms and showers to be clean. Interviews with residents revealed that housekeeping staff will clean resident rooms. CONTINUED TO 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 8, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220513170250
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff fraudulently signed facility MAR stating resident's medications were administered Staff mismanaged resident medications Staff do not respond to resident's call for assistance in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 05/09/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. The allegations: Staff do not respond to resident's call for assistance in a timely manner and Staff mismanaged resident medications were previously cited and the facility recently implemeted a Plan of Correction. Interviews and record reviews revealed that while administering morning medications to residents, S1 would pour all medications and sign off on the MAR that medications were given prior to administering the medications to the residents. S2 observed medications that "were poured but not given"; however, the MAR indicated that medications were administered. CONTINUED 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 9, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220408171548
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents Facility is in disrepair Facility is unkempt
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted with residents and staff, the allegations: Staff failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents, Facility is in disrepair and Facility is unkempt are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of thisCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220304101758
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMultiple resident(s) sustained pressure injury(ies). Staff left resident in soiled diaper/clothing for an extended period of time Staff does not provide adequate food service for residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted with residents and staff, the allegations: Multiple resident(s) sustained pressure injury(ies), Staff left resident in soiled diaper/clothing for an extended period of time, Staff does not provide adequate food service for residents are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to AdministrCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220208101724
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond timely to resident call due to insufficient staffing
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Interviews with residents revealed that facility staff are “slow at coming” when responding to emergency call buttons. During the investigation, LPA observed staff responding to an emergency call 27 minutes after the emergency pendent was pressed. CONTINUED TO LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220203130953
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings Resident's room is dirty Staff did not provided resident with adequate bedding Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs Resident's bathroom has no hand soap Resident's TV is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Consistent interviews with staff revealed that R1 would frequently remove R1’s hearing aid due to the hearing aid making a “whistling” noise in R1’s ear. While R1 resided at the facility, staff found R1’s hearing aid in various places including R1’s dining plate, R1’s sock and R1’s shoe. CONTINUED TO LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220111085127
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents showering needs are not being met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Consistent statements from staff revealed that once a resident is given a shower, the attending staff will sign off on the shower schedule indicating that the resident was showered. Staff interviews revealed that “some residents will get a shower and others won’t”. LPA reviewed shower records at the above facility and observed the shower schedule was not updated and multiple rooms did not have a staff initial indicating the shower was completed. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20211130111055
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility neglect resulting in resident developing infection. Facility staff did not observe change in resident's health condition. Resident's bathing needs were not met while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This is an amended report. On 03/09/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced at the above facility to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pam Hamilton. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the allegations: Facility neglect resulting in resident developing infection, Facility staff did not observe change in resident's health condition and Resident's bathing needs were not met while in care are UNSUBSTANTIATED. CONTINUED TO LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 9, 2022 · control 24-AS-20211129152314

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 59 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
14
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
32
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
59
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(559) 446-1266
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Westmont Of Fresno? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.