Large community · Licensed for 155 · Fresno
Westmont of Fresno
7442 & 7468 N Millbrook Ave, Fresno, CA 93720Licensed since 2019
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 155: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchair
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 20 residents
- Bedridden
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 7442 N MILLBROOK AVE APPROVED FOR 95 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 7468 N MILLBROOK AVE APPROVED FOR 60 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Assistance with transfers
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Low-sodium or cardiac diet available
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Caring.com · September 9, 2026
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 20 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Westmont of Fresno: two-person transfers or a lift and who is awake overnight. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,050a month to start
Likely $2,350–$3,850
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Costs & moving in
Payment methodsCredit card
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$3,050likely a month
Starting monthly rate$3,050likely $2,350–$3,850
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$3,500this home · one time
The home lists this one-time fee on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,350–$4,050
- $3,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,850–$7,550
- $6,550
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,595 to $4,895
11 homes like this within 8 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,350–$4,400.
- The WindhamFresno · 0.3 mi · Large community$3,395Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The GroveFresno · 0.5 mi · Large community$4,195Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Cedarbrook Memory Care CommunityFresno · 0.6 mi · Large community$3,600Listed on Seniorly · memory care · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- The Terraces at San Joaquin GardensFresno · 2.1 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Saddle Ridge Senior LivingClovis · 2.1 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Fairwinds - Woodward ParkFresno · 2.2 mi · Large community$3,935Listed on its own website · assisted living, starting at · seen October 27, 2026
- Summerfield of FresnoFresno · 4.7 mi · Large community$3,595Listed on its own website · memory care, starting price · seen October 5, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Carmel Village at ClovisClovis · 5.1 mi · Large community$4,000Listed on its own website · assisted living · seen October 27, 2026
- Oakmont of North FresnoFresno · 5.9 mi · Large community$4,895Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Paintbrush Assisted Living and Memory CareFresno · 6.8 mi · Large community$3,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Kingston Bay Senior LivingFresno · 7.6 mi · Large community$2,595Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (8)Shared / companion rooms · Laundry · Wifi in resident rooms
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (3)Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen · Meals served in the room · Family may eat with the resident
Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals served in the room
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Family may eat with the resident
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (3)Exercise or fitness program · Trips outside the home · Religious services at the home
Exercise or fitness programTai chi · General fitness
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (2)Residents may bring a pet · Pet types the home excludes
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pet types the home excludesLarge dogs · Small dogs
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (1)Transport for group outings
Transport for group outings
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Where it is
7442 & 7468 N Millbrook Ave, Fresno, CA 93720Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- San Joaquin Valley Rehabilitation HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.4 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #107208908 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 24 of 50 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 12 “Unsubstantiated” and 4 “Unfounded”.
20263 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 06/19/2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M Vega and A Porter arrived at the facility unannounced. LPAs conducted a Case Management visit. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met Executive Director - Eddie Rangel. This case management visit is being conducted for two separate Special Incident Reports (SIR) dated 05/27/2026 and 6/10/2026. Incident report dated 5/27/2026 R1 was sent to the ER and was diagnosed with an infection. Interview with ED disclosed that resident was out of the facility and when R1 returned they were observed to have a high fever and were sent out by facility per facility LVN request. The second Special Incident Report (SIR) dated 06/10/2026 reported R2 was contacted by external persons requesting money, the facility was made aware and put a stop to the situation, ED will provide LPA police report At this time, the case management visit does require a police report for incident on 06/10/2026 based on information provided by ED to LPAs. No deficiencies cited during todays visit. Exit interview completed with Executive Director. A copy of this report was provided to ED for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2026
Jun 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 06/19/2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M Vega and A Porter arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. LPAs were greeted by custodian and stated the purpose of the visit. LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) - Eddie Rangel. LPAs conducted tour inside and out of facility with ED. Residents were observed at the facility after breakfast in common areas and other residents were in their rooms. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature of 74 to 76 degrees throughout, good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 01/15/2026. Fire alarm inspection, 03/25/2026. Fire drill recorded 05/30/2026. Generator Tested 06/13/2026. A sample of residents’ file was reviewed to have updated emergency contact, Admission agreement, Needs and Services Plan and Pre-Appraisal Plan. A sample of staff files were reviewed. Staff files were observed to have current First Aid/CPR, Health screening, and Personnel record. Staff are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator, and pantry. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 40.0-degree F. and freezer was maintained at -10 -degree F. LPAs toured laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and inaccessible to residents in care. Continuation on LIC 809C LPAs toured a sample of resident bedrooms. Residents' rooms were toured and observed with adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested at 3 different locations, assisted living resident room at 107.2 Degrees F, Bathroom 2 tested at 113.5 Degrees F. On the memory side of things resident bathroom rested at 110.5 Degrees F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bars and non-skid mat in shower areas. Medications were stored in a locked medication room in a medication cart. Medications records were reviewed. First Aid Kit was stored in medication room and observed with all required items. Reviewed Emar and conducted medication count, accurate at time of inspection. Facility exterior was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor shaded seating available for the residents. Community Care Licensing (CCL) is always striving to have facility files that reflect the most accurate and up to date information for your facility. In an effort to maintain your facility file, please submit the most current and complete forms and/or information as identified below: Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 400 Affidavit Regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources LIC 402 Surety Bond LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency And Disaster Plan For Residential Care Facilities For The Elderly LIC 9020 Register of Facility Clients/Residents Copy of current Liability Insurance Copy of current Administrator Certificate Alternate contact information including name, telephone number, & email address. Please submit the above forms/information to Fresno CCL by: 07/03/2026 As an operator of a Community Care Licensed facility it is your responsibility to be aware of and in compliance with all regulations, including Chaptered Legislation. Go to www.ccld.ca.gov to stay updated and informed. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director A copy of this report was given to ED whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these reports.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2026
Mar 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Faciltiy not following Admission Agreement
On 03/19/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility. During this visit LPA opened initial 10 day and delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegation. LPA was granted access to the facility by front desk staff. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) - Eddie Rangel. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegation: “Facility not following Admission Agreement” is UNFOUNDED. Per review of Facility roster, billing agreement, and admissions agreement. Billing agreement clearly states timeframes that coverage will be provided by third party for payment to facility. This agency has investigated the complaint and found it be UNFOUNDED meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. The complaint has been dismissed. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided to the Executive Director for facility records. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260317113339
Feb 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure visitations are not infringing on the rights of the resident
On 02/13/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegation. LPA was granted access to the facility by front desk staff. LPA met with Business Office Director - Nancy Krompicha and Executive Director - Eddie Rangel During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation, as well as conducting interviews. It was determined that the above allegation: Staff does not ensure visitations are not infringing on the rights of the resident is UNFOUNDED. Resident 1 (R1) and Responsible Party (RP) has no documented court order to restrict who can and cannot visit R1. Business Office Director and Executive Director verified that to be true. This agency has investigated the complaint and found it be UNFOUNDED meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. The complaint has been dismissed. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided to the Executive Director for facility records. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251215105836
20256 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit on 12/12/2025. LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA served Decision and Order excluding Staff 1 (S1) from being present inside the facility. LPA requested a current and updated Personnel Report (LIC 500) and Guardian account be updated to remove S1 from the facility staff roster. A notice of completion shall be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL). LPA informed Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel that S1 is not allowed to be employed and/or on any facility premises. The Decision and Order of Exclusion From All Facilities came into effect as of 11/17/2025 upon receipt of the letter. A copy of the letter was given to facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel during this visit. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies were observed and cited. Exit interview held with Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel, A Copy of report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2025
Nov 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff is not adhering to the admission agreement Staff did not ensure the facility transportation bus was fixed timely
On 11/07/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived at facility and was allowed access to facility by staff. LPA conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Administrator - Eddie Rangel. The purpose of the visit was to close a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that the facility was not, Staff is not, adhering to the admission agreement, Staff did not ensure the facility transportation bus was fixed timely. There are reports that indicate the main bus transport was in repair shop being worked on and that facility still had van to shuttle residents and also had invoices that show alternate methods of transportation available. Therefore, determined the allegation is unfounded. Continuation on LIC 9099C Unfounded This agency has investigated the complaints alleging “Staff is not adhering to the admission agreement and Staff did not ensure the facility transportation bus was fixed timely” We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. No deficiencies were observed at the time of this visit nor any deficiencies issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the administrator, signature confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025 · control 24-AS-20251017155436
Jul 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility does not have enough staff for residents in care Facility does not have an Activities Director
On 7/7/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator - Eddie Rangel. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted record review and toured the facility. Based on documentation gathered, allegation alleging Facility does not have enough staff for residents in care and Facility does not have an Activities Director, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBTANTIATED. No deficiencies were issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the administrator, signature confirms receipt of this report. Unsubstantiated This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “maintaining, Resident bathrooms are unsanitary, Resident assaulted another resident, Facility did not seek medical services in a timely manner and Neglect / lack of supervision resulting in an injury.” We have found that the complaint(s) are unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that these allegations were unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the allegations listed above. No deficiencies were issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the administrator, signature confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250313163105
Jul 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner Staff left resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time
On 07/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Administrator - Eddie Rangel. The purpose of the visit was to close a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that the facility was not Staff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner and Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time (R1- see attached confidential names list). Based on documentation collected and record review it has been determined that the facility does ensure R1 receives appropriate level of care per documentation received and therefore, determined the allegation is unfounded. Continuation on LIC 9099C Unfounded This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Staff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner and Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time” We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. No deficiencies were issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the administrator, signature confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250313131536
Jul 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Eddie Rangel. LPA conducted tour inside and out of facility with ED. Residents were observed at the facility after breakfast in common areas and other residents were in their rooms. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees, clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 01/13/2025. Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator, and pantry. Food is delivered twice a week. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 43.0-degree F. and freezer was maintained at -6-degree F. LPA toured a sample of resident bedrooms. Residents' rooms were toured and observed with adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested at 4 different locations, assisted living resident room at 111.3 Degrees F, General Bathroom tested at 107.4 Degrees F. On the memory side of things resident bathroom rested at 110.8 Degrees F and the general restroom tested at 105.4 Degrees F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bars and non-skid mat in shower areas. Report continued on attached LIC 809C Medications were stored in a locked medication room in a medication cart. Medications records were reviewed. First Aid Kit was stored in medication room and observed with all required items. LPA toured laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and locked. Facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor shaded seating available for the residents. A sample of residents’ file was reviewed to have updated emergency contact, Admission agreement, Needs and Services Plan and Pre-Appraisal Plan. A sample of staff files were reviewed. Staff files were observed to have current First Aid/CPR, Health screening, and Personnel record. Staff are fingerprinted clear and associated to the facility. Community Care Licensing (CCL) is always striving to have facility files that reflect the most accurate & up to date information for your facility. In an effort to maintain your facility file, please submit the most current & complete forms &/or information as identified below: Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE): LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan For Residential Care Facilities For The Elderly LIC 9020 Register of Facility Clients/Residents Please submit the above forms/information to Fresno CCL by: 07/24/25 As an operator of a Community Care Licensed facility it is your responsibility to be aware of and in compliance with all regulations, including Chaptered Legislation. Go to www.ccld.ca.gov to stay updated and informed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025
Feb 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit on 02/21/2025 at 08:15 a.m.. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. Executive Director was called and notified of LPA arrival. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Eduardo Rangel. LPA served Decision and Order excluding Staff 1 (S1) from being present inside the facility. LPA requested a current and updated Personnel Report (LIC 500) and Guardian account be updated to remove S1 from the facility staff roster. A notice of completion shall be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL). LPA informed Executive Director (ED) Eduardo Rangel that S1 is not allowed to be employed and/or on any facility premises. The Decision and Order of Exclusion From All Facilities came into effect as of 02/21/25 upon receipt of the letter. A copy of the letter was given to facility Executive Director (ED) Eduardo Rangel during this visit. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies were observed and cited. Exit interview held Executive Director (ED) Eduardo Rangel. A copy of this report was provided to the ED, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025
Jan 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure privacy while providing personal care to residents
On 01/28/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eduardo Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA conducted interviews of 3 staff members interviews. 2 out of 3 staff members stated the allegations did not occur. Allegation: Staff do not ensure privacy while providing personal care to residents Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report was printed and provided to the Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2025 · control 24-AS-20241029140334
Jan 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 01/28/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Eduardo Rangel. LPA conduced a follow-up on an incident report submitted to licensing 12/17/2024, in which it was reported that Client #1 was out of medication for 6 days. Incident was reported to ED and the client's Physician was notified. Client was placed on observation with no issues observed. Med Tech was was disciplined and retrained on medication administration and is being closely monitored for the foreseeable future with daily checks. ED stated that all Med Techs were retrained. No deficiencies were cited because immediate and appropriate action was taken.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2025
20249 state visits · 12 documents
Oct 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision of children in care. Facility staff do not communicate with resident’s authorized representative. Facility staff left residents in soiled diapers for an extended period of time. Facility staff did not ensure restroom is clean and sanitized. The resident’s room is malodorous.
On 10/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Allegation: Facility staff did not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. Based on staff interview and records review no orders to provide Zyprexa to resident 1 (R1) Although Tramadol ordered as 1 tablet by mouth every six (6) hours for pain as needed. Allegation: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision of children in care. Based on interview and records review no children observed at the facility to supervise. . Report continues on attached LIC-9099 C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Facility staff do not communicate with resident’s authorized representative. Based on interview and records review facility communicated with resident responsible party and communication was not denied. Allegation: Facility staff left residents in soiled diapers for an extended period of time. Based on interview and records review staff check on residents every 30 minutes. Allegation: Facility staff did not ensure restroom is clean and sanitized. Based on observations during facility visits on 7/12, and 9/13, the facility staff clean residents rooms daily to maintain rooms clean and in good repair. Allegation: The resident’s room is malodorous. Based on observations during facility visits on 7/12, and 9/13, staff interview and records review facility once observed staff clean residents rooms once notified by family, residents or staff. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240705144042
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87218(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 11, 2024
87218 Theft and Loss. (a) (2) A licensee who fails to make reasonable efforts to safeguard resident property, shall reimburse a resident for or replace stolen or lost resident property at its current value. The licensee shall be presumed to have made reasonable efforts to safeguard resident property if there is clear and convincing evidence of efforts to meet each requirement specified in Section 1569.153. This regulation was not observed as evidenced by: The facility failed to provide a replacement or monetary refund to resident when lost hearing aid for R1 while resided at the facility in June 2024, which poses health and safety risk to persons in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2024
Plan of correction: The administrator offered to review inventory list upon moving residents in to the community. Administrator also will educate family and staff on inventory process. Administrator will provide plan of correction to LPA by POC due date, 10/11/2024
Sep 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet infection control requirements Facility is malodorous Staff did not ensure resident had clean laundry
On 06/10/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not meet infection control requirements. Based on observations, records review and interviews which occurred on 06/05/2024 and 09/13/2024 no infection control violations observed and reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Facility is malodorous. Based off observations on 06/05/2024 and 09/13/2024 and interviews no concerns from residents of malodorous smell was observed and reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident had clean laundry. Based of staff and residents interviews and record reviews facility providing laundry to all residents daily as scheduled based on residents hallway location. No concerns from residents interviewed that laundry was not done. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted report signed and copy of this report provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240605100546
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 17, 2024
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interviews the facility failed to fo ensure resident room was cleaned and desinfected till 5/31/24 after resident left the facility on 5/13/24, was admited to the hospital and have not returned to the community. This poses potential health, safety and personal rights risc to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2024
Plan of correction: The facility Admiinistrstor will provde a written statement on plan of correction to resolve the deficiency and maintain the facility in complaiance by POCdue date 09/17/2027
Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow infection control practices Staff did not follow reporting requirements
On 08/01/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not follow infection control practices, Staff did not follow reporting requirements . During complaint investigation the department reviewed facility files, interviewed facility staff and the Administrator. Based of files review, interview and observation no reports of not following infection control and not following reporting requirements observed during the visit on 3/22/24 and 08/01/24. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240321131338
Aug 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 08/01/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Eddie Rangel, certification number 60220138740 and expiration date 09/23/2024. LPA conducted tour inside and out of facility with ED. Residents were observed at the facility after lunch and in common areas during events. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees, clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 01/02/2024 Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator, and pantry. Food is delivered twice a week. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 43.0-degree F. and freezer was maintained at -6-degree F. LPA toured a sample of resident bedrooms. Residents' rooms were toured and observed with adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested at 106 degrees F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bars and non-skid mat in all shower areas. Medications were stored in a locked medication room in a medication cart. Medications records were reviewed. First Aid Kit was stored in medication room and observed with all required items. Adequate PPE supplies was observed. LPA toured laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and locked. Facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor seating available for the residents. Report continues on attached LIC809-C A sample of residents’ file was reviewed to have updated emergency contact, Admission agreement, Needs and Services Plan and Pre-Appraisal Plan. A sample of staff files were reviewed. Staff files were observed to have current First Aid/CPR, Health screening, and Personnel record. Staff are fingerprinted clear and associated to the facility. Community Care Licensing (CCL) is always striving to have facility files that reflect the most accurate & up to date information for your facility. In an effort to maintain your facility file, please submit the most current & complete forms &/or information as identified below: Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE): · LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility · -as applicable: LIC 309 Administrative Organization · LIC 500 Personnel Report · LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan For Residential Care Facilities For The Elderly · LIC 9020 Register of Facility Clients/Residents Please submit the above forms/information to Fresno CCL by: 08/04/2024 As an operator of a Community Care Licensed facility it is your responsibility to be aware of and in compliance with all regulations, including Chaptered Legislation. Go to www.ccld.ca.gov to stay updated and informed. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with the ED. A copy of this report was given to the ED, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these reports.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024
Apr 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not prevent spread of scabies amongst residents and staff.
On 04/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Facility staff did not prevent spread of scabies amongst residents and staff. During this investigation LPA reviewed facility files, interview facility staff and medical personnel. Based of interviews, and records review no staff or residents contracted scabies. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided for facility record. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240205113233
Apr 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident receives contracted services. Staff do not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. Staff do not assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. Staff do not adequately monitor facility entrance doors.
On 04/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident receives contracted services. During this investigation LPA reviewed resident’s files, interview facility staff and resident. Based off file review resident receives contracted services including ADA accommodation of no charge. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Report continues on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not dispense resident’s medication as prescribed. During this investigation department reviewed resident medications, no medication errors were observed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff do not assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. Based of staff interview and history records review no files to support alleged violation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff do not adequately monitor facility entrance doors. Based of LPA observation and staff interview facility doors are monitored by staff during visiting hours from 730 am to 6pm and locked during none visiting hours with call access provided. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240126153840
Mar 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility door locks are in good repair.
On 3/22/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff does not ensure facility door locks are in good repair. During complaint investigation the department interviewed facility staff and the Administrator. Based off of observations, the Administrator, staff, and residents interviews the facility door locks are in good repair. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240221091513
Mar 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medication to resident in a timely manner.
On 3/13/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not dispense medication to resident in a timely manner. During complaint investigation the department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and the Administrator. Based off of facility records review medication administration to R1 as prescribed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231212143827
Feb 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for residents with scabies.
On 2/23/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention for residents with scabies. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and Administrator. The facility addressed scabies by notifying medical and administering medicine to residents effected. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to the Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231130115026
Feb 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
On 02/21/2024, a scheduled informal meeting was conducted via teleconference. The purpose of the informal meeting was to discuss recently identified issues associated with the operation of the facility and to provide support on the subject matter. Informal meeting process was explained during this meeting. Present at the informal meeting were: Licensing Program Analyst, Vadim Gorban Licensing Program Manager, Brenda Chan Executive Director, Eduardo Rangel Regional VP of Operations, Cassondra Bradford This meeting was called to discuss the following issues or deficiencies: Facility staffing Care and Supervision Medications Reporting Requirements Report continues on LIC809-C Executive Director, Eddie Rangel agreed to do the following in order to bring the facility into compliance no later than 02/26/2024: The licensee and Executive Director to develop a plan of action in writing describing how the facility shall ensure compliance with the facility staffing, care and supervision, medication, and reporting requirements. Executive Director has been advised that failure to complete the above agreed action by the date will result in this Department taking following actions: CCLD may increase monitoring to ensure the facility's adherence to this plan of compliance. CCLD may take administration action against the Licensee. The Licensee was provided Technical Support Program and resources at www.cdss.ca.gov Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to the Executive Director, Eddie Rangel.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2024
Feb 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are allowing residents to share hygiene products Staff are allowing the residents to share clothes while in care Staff are disclosing the residents personal information Staff are not providing adequate supervision to the residents while in care
On 2/01/24, LPA Gorban visited the facility to deliver the findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured facility inside and pout and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed finding with the AD. Allegations: Staff are allowing residents to share hygiene products. Staff are allowing the residents to share clothes while in care. Staff are disclosing the residents personal information. Staff are not providing adequate supervision to the residents while in care. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and Administrator. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on LIC9099-A Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231103105434
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 2, 2024
87465 (c)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care. Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Facility failed to administer mediations as prescribed and acording to physician directions. This poses an immediate risk to health and safety to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024
Plan of correction: AD will provide as a POA during inservice training for the facility staff on 2/01/24 and once complete, will provide a written statement to LPA by 2/02/2024 by email.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 5, 2024
87211 Reporting Requirements (a)(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of occurence. This requirement was not met as evicencd by: The acility failed to provide a report to Licensing Agency following the title 22 gegulation in timely manner. This poses potentia risk to health and safety to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024
Plan of correction: AD will provide a staff trainig and education during the facility inservice training on reporting requirements following Title 22 accordingly and in timely manner.
Feb 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident for assistance. Staff made inappropriate comment in presence of resident.
On 1/27/24, LPA Gorban visited the facility to deliver the findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Eddie Rangel and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured facility inside and pout and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed finding with the Administrator. Allegations: Staff did not respond to resident for assistance, Staff made inappropriate comment in presence of residents. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff and Administrator. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted report signed and copy of this report provided to Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231106100715
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 26 documents
20237 state visits · 9 documents
Nov 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility does not have an administrator.
On 11/07/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited the facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Business Office Director Jennifer Fowler, explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Patrick Frazier was notified of licensing visit. LPA toured the facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegations. Allegation: facility does not have an administrator. During this investigation department reviewed facility file and interviewed administrator and staff. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided for facility records. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230915102336
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility alarm is in disrepair
On 9/28/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Jennifer Fowler explained the purpose of the visit and discussed findings. Allegation: Facility alarm is in disrepair During complaint investigation LPA tested facility alarm and appears is operational. LPA reviewed facility files and interviewed staff. Although the allegation “Facility alarm is in disrepair” may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy provided to AD for facility records. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from wandering from facility. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the resident was found outside sleeping on the ground and staff was not aware of resident location. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.” Exit interview conducted, report signed, and copy of this report with appeal rights provided to Administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230711084903
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.2(c) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 29, 2023
1569.2 (c) “Care and supervision” means the facility assumes responsibility for, or provides or promises to provide in the future, ongoing assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered... This was not observed as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews R1's mental health, physical health , and safety was jeopardize when she end up unsupervised outside the facility in the middle of the night time. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator will provide staff in services on resident supervision, mental health, and safety. Training for dementia will be provided to staff and notify Licensing by 09/29/23
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87705(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 16, 2023
87705 Care of Persons with Dementia. (2) Safety measures to address behaviors such as wandering, aggressive behavior and ingestion of toxic materials. This was not observed as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews R1 was able unsupervised leave facility building unsupervised in the middle of the night. Facility did not provide safety measures to address wondering behavior which cause R1 being unsupervised for unknown amount of hours and outside of the facility in the middle of the night.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023
Plan of correction: Facility will provide staff training on dementia and wandering. Facility will provide completed training to Licensing by 10/16/23
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair. Staff did not ensure that a resident's room is maintained at a comfortable temperature.
On 9/28/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Jennifer Fowler explained the purpose of the visit and discussed findings. Allegation: Facility is in disrepair. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that a resident's room is maintained at a comfortable temperature. During this investigation LPA observed facility, reviewed history files, facility files, and interviewed facility staff. Based on investigation listed above these allegations are Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and provided to AD for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230705085754
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jul 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 7/28/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted an unannounced Case Management visit the facility that was reported to Licensing on 7/24/23. LPA introduced self and was allowed entrance by staff. LPA Gorban met with Administrator Erik Schuk. LPA toured facility inside and out, observed residents in dining room during breakfast. LPA Gorban reviewed facility residents’ files, interviewed staff and administrator. LPA attempted to interview residents R1 and R2. LPA requested following facility files: staff schedule, residents files, facility policy and procedures, and staff training. No deficiencies cited during this Case Management visit. Exit interview was conducted, report signed on-site, and a copy of this report was provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2023
Jul 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 7/18/23 Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) V Gorban conducted a case management visit to the facility stated above regarding incident involved resident (R1) occurred in the facility reported on 6/14/2023, Incident was not reported until 6/26/23. LPA stated purpose of the visit and met Administrator Erik Schuk. LPA toured facility with AD inside and out. LPA reviewed facility files and interview staff. LPA verified facility staff (S1) is currently not working in the facility. LPA interviewed AD and verified with AD that S1 has not been worked in facility since 6/16/23. Administrator provided disassociated S1 from facility personnel report provided by AD to LPA Gorban during visit. Exit interview conducted, report signed, printed with appeal rights. Deficiency cited on attached 809 Dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 18, 2023
87211(a)(1) Reporting Requirements A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPAs record review. Licensee did not report incident of R1 which poses potential health and safety and/or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2023
Plan of correction: For plan of correction (POC) Administrator agrees to review and submit a written statement on how this regulation will be met in the future by POC due date 7/30/23
Jul 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not dispense medication as prescribed
On 7/05/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted the subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA met with Michelle Gonzalez, Residential Services Director (RSD), explained the purpose of the visit, and discussed allegation findings. Administrator Erik Schuk was not available. Allegation: Facility staff did not dispense medication as prescribed During the course of investigation of this complaint LPA interviewed facility staff, obtained and reviewed facility records. Medication was not provided to resident as prescribed. Facility file had medication on record but was not provided to R1 as prescribed. Based on observations, interviews which were conducted, and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted with RSD. Copy of this report signed and provided with appeal rights for facility records. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230404100407
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 5, 2023
87465(c)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care: ....Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews facility staff failed to give medication as prescribed and resident missed medications, which poses an immediate Health and Safety risc to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2023
Plan of correction: Facility will ensure to educate staff and provide medication training. All in service medication training will be completed and copy provided to CCL for the plan of correction by 07/07/23.
Jul 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assist resident in a timely manner
This document is amended of the original report. On 7/05/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted the subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA met with Residents Services Director (RSD), Michelle Gonzalez, explained the purpose of the visit and discussed allegation findings. Administrator Erik Schuk was not available. Allegation: Facility staff did not assist resident in a timely manner During the course of investigation, observation, records reviews and interviews, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with RSD. Copy of this report signed and provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230404100407
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jun 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility does not have adequate staff to meet the needs of the residents Facility staff are not properly handling resident's medications.
On 06/08/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gorban arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and was greeted by receptionist. LPA requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA toured facility, reviewed residents’ records, observed residents in common area. LPA discussed finding with Administrator Erik Schuk. Allegation: Facility does not have adequate staff to meet the needs of the residents. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. During LPAs visit, based on observation facility had substantial number of staff. Based on records review and facility provided proof of medications, elderly and dementia training, the allegation: Facility does not have adequate staff to meet the needs of the residents is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Facility staff are not properly handling resident's medications. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. LPA observed medication technicians handling residents’ medication while visiting facility. Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted with residents and staff, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur therefore this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. Report signed and copy of this report provided to Erik Schuk Administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 8, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230321164409
Mar 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
This is an amended report issued on 3/21/2023. On 3/24/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above. LPA met with Assistance Administrator Jennifer Fowler , stated purpose of the visit and allowed entry in the facility followed infection prevention protocol. LPA visited facility to follow up on incident reported to department on 03/01/23. Erick Schuk was not available to assist LPA. LPA attempted to interview resident (R1). Facility reports states R1 has dementia and unable to confirm return of the ring since R1 was not aware ring was missing in the first place. LPA contacted family member, who is R1’s daughter. Family member and responsible party (RP) confirmed that ring returned to family, and they keep in their possession. Administrator stated that S1 last day of work was on 03/02/23. Administrator stated that S1 was terminated on the same day. Facility staff disassociated S1 from LIC500, facility roster. Exit interview conducted, report signed by facility Assistance Administrator Jennifer Fowler and provided for facility records. Original document was returned to LPA on 3/24/2023.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2023
20229 state visits · 15 documents
Oct 13, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 10/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Erik Schuk The purpose of this visit is to follow up on an incident report that was submitted to the Fresno CCL office. It was reported that on 09/13/2022 a hospice resident received a medication that had been discontinued. A deficiency is being cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, on the attached 809D. A civil penalty in the amount of $250 is being assessed for repeat violation. Exit interview conducted and a plan of correction was reviewed and developed with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator, Erik V. Schuk, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 14, 2022
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)(4): The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the facility did not ensure the requirements for section 87465(a)(4) were met when facility staff administered a medication to R1 that had been discontinued, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a written statement detailing the steps the facility will take to ensure the requirements of this section are met to the Fresno CCL office by the POC due date.
Oct 3, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to egress alarm timely, resulting in resident exiting memory care, falling and sustaining an injury
On 10/3/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Erik Schuck During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a facility tour, interviewed staff, and reviewed records. Based on interviews and records review, staff did not respond timely to the egress alarm, resulting in R1 exiting the facility, falling, and sustaining a head injury requiring that medical attention be sought. Review of the facility Alarm Event Report indicates that staff responded to the egress alarm approximately 34 minutes later. Based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation: Staff did not respond to egress alarm timely, resulting in resident exiting memory care, falling and sustaining an injury is SUBSTANTIATED. CONTINUED TO 9099C. Substantiated A deficiency is being cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 on the attached 9099D. The issuance of civil penalties is currently under review. The details of civil penalties will be outlined in a future report to the facility, if any. Exit interview conducted and a Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator, Erik Schuk whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documentsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220729113420
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 4, 2022
87468.2(a)(4): (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1...residents...shall have all of the following personal rights: (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not ensure R1's needs were met when R1 was able to leave the facility undetected resulting in a fall outside of the facility which is an immediate health and safety risk to residents/clients in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a written statement detailing the steps the facility will take to ensure the requirements for this section are met including the facility's plan to train all staff on emergency prototcols to the Fresno CCL Office by the POC due date.
Oct 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 10/3/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Erick Schuk. The purpose of this visit is to follow up on an incident report that was submitted to the Fresno CCL office. It was reported that on 08/03/2022, a medication error occurred resulting staff administering the same medication to R1 twice. During the course of investigation #24-AS-20220729113420, it was found that R2 had multiple falls in the facility and the facility did not report the incidents to the Fresno CCL office. Deficiencies are being issued in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, on the attached 809D. Exit interview conducted and a Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator, Erik Schuk whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documentsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 4, 2022
87465(a)(4): (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following:(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed, this requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on record review, the license did not ensure the requirements for this section were met when staff administered two of the same medication to R1, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents/clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a written statement detailing the steps the facility will take to ensure the requirements for this section are met to the Fresno CCL office by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 31, 2022
87211(a)(1): Each licensee shall furnish...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence, this requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not ensure the requirements for this section were met when LPA observed that R1 had multiple falls in the facility which were not reported to the Fresno CCL Office.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to train all staff on the requirements of section 87211 and submit proof of attendance and training topics to the Fresno CCL office by the POC due date.
Aug 8, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident's room has a foul odor. Resident's closet is cluttered with soiled linens. Resident's bathroom is unkempt Resident was left unattended. Resident's bathroom is dirty. Staff did not transport resident to medical appointment in a timely manner. Unqualified staff providing transportation for resident's. Facility not properly managing resident's medications. Facility did not seek medical care for resident.
On 08/08/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator Erik Schuk. Today’s visit included staff interviews. During the investigation, LPA reviewed resident records, interviewed staff and residents, and conducted a facility tour. During the facility tour LPA observed residents’ apartments to be clean with no obstructions to pathways. LPA observed residents’ bathrooms and showers to be clean. Interviews with residents revealed that housekeeping staff will clean resident rooms. CONTINUED TO 9099C Unsubstantiated Interviews with transportation staff revealed that the facility does not transport residents who require assistance with a wheelchair or are unable to transfer in and out of the vehicle. Transportation staff will make arrangements with Comfort Med Trans to transport wheelchair bound residents. Interviews with staff revealed that antibiotic medications are documented on a paper MAR. Antibiotics are administered to residents as prescribed. Based on observation, record review, and interviews the allegations: Resident's room has a foul odor, Resident's closet is cluttered with soiled linens, Resident's bathroom is unkempt, Resident was left unattended, Resident's bathroom is dirty, Staff did not transport resident to medical appointment in a timely manner, Unqualified staff providing transportation for resident's, Facility not properly managing resident's medications and Facility did not seek medical care for resident are found to be UNSUBSTANTAITED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued during the inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator, Erik Schuk, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220513170250
Jul 28, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/28/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to conduct an Annual Inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Erik Schuk. Facility has one central entry and exit and has implemented a sign in policy/symptom screening for visitors. Facility tour conducted. Facility did not have obstructions blocking pathways, entrances, and exits. No fire clearance issues observed during this inspection. Staff observed to be wearing facial coverings. Residents encouraged to wear facial coverings in common areas and when out of the facility. High traffic areas are sanitized at least once a day. LPA observed signs promoting cough sneeze etiquette, hand-washing, and social distancing. LPA observed hand-sanitizer dispensers at the front entrance and elevator. LPA observed hand-washing signs in facility bathrooms. LPA toured the following resident rooms: 105, 112, 117, 120, 134, 224, A3, B4, B8, E1, E8, and F8. Bedrooms at this facility are single occupant. In room 134, LPA observed medications and knives to be accessible in the apartment. LPA observed a 30 day supply of medications. LPA observed a supply of PPE and cleaning supplies. Staff records reviewed for good health. Residents files observed to have updated emergency contact information. LPA is requesting the following documents be submitted to the Fresno CCL office by 08/11/2022: Current copy of Administrator Certificate, Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC308), Administrator Organization (LIC 309), Affidavit regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources (LIC 400), Liability Insurance, Emergency and Disaster Plan (LIC 610E) Personnel Report (LIC500), Register of Facility Clients/Residents for (LIC9020A) and Surety Bond CONTINUED TO 809C Deficiencies are being cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, on the attached 809D. An exit interview was conducted and a Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator, Erik Schuk, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
May 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff fraudulently signed facility MAR stating resident's medications were administered Staff mismanaged resident medications Staff do not respond to resident's call for assistance in a timely manner
On 05/09/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. The allegations: Staff do not respond to resident's call for assistance in a timely manner and Staff mismanaged resident medications were previously cited and the facility recently implemeted a Plan of Correction. Interviews and record reviews revealed that while administering morning medications to residents, S1 would pour all medications and sign off on the MAR that medications were given prior to administering the medications to the residents. S2 observed medications that "were poured but not given"; however, the MAR indicated that medications were administered. CONTINUED 9099C Substantiated Based on observation and interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation: Staff fraudulently signed facility MAR stating resident's medications were administered is found to be SUBSTANTIATED A deficiency is being cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, see attached 9099D. An exit interview was conducted, and a Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this documentthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220408171548
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87207 · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022
87207 False Claims: No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, S1 made false/misleading statements when S1 initialed that medications were administered to residents when S1 did not administer medications. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a written statement detialing how the facility will ensure that employees do not make or disseminate any false or misleading statements regarding the facility or services to the Fresno CCL office by the POC due date.
May 2, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 05/02/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management - Inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. The purpose of today's inspection is to follow up on an incident that occurred on 04/18/2022. It was reported that at the beginning of S2's shift, S2 observed a Medication cup with morning medications poured for R1, but the medications were not administered. S1 was did not administer morning medications, however: S1 documented that medications were given to R1. A deficiency is being issued in accordance with the California Code Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 on the attached 809D. An exit interview was conducted and a Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 3, 2022
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility...(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirementw as not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the Licesnee did not ensure all residents were assisted with self-administered medications as needed. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2022
Plan of correction: Per Licensee, S1 received additional medication training which included shadowing. Documenation of training and training topics was submitted to the Fresno CCL office. POC Cleared during visit.
Apr 13, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents Facility is in disrepair Facility is unkempt
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted with residents and staff, the allegations: Staff failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents, Facility is in disrepair and Facility is unkempt are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220304101758
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Apr 13, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Multiple resident(s) sustained pressure injury(ies). Staff left resident in soiled diaper/clothing for an extended period of time Staff does not provide adequate food service for residents.
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted with residents and staff, the allegations: Multiple resident(s) sustained pressure injury(ies), Staff left resident in soiled diaper/clothing for an extended period of time, Staff does not provide adequate food service for residents are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220208101724
Apr 13, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond timely to resident call due to insufficient staffing
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Interviews with residents revealed that facility staff are “slow at coming” when responding to emergency call buttons. During the investigation, LPA observed staff responding to an emergency call 27 minutes after the emergency pendent was pressed. CONTINUED TO LIC9099C Substantiated Based on observation and interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation: Staff do not respond timely to resident call due to insufficient staffing is found to be SUBSTANTIATED A deficiency is being cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, see attached 9099D. An exit interview was conducted, and a Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220203130953
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(d)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2022
(d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience in the job assigned to them. This training and/or related experience shall provide knowledge of and skill in the following… (3) Skill and knowledge required to provide necessary resident care and supervision… This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, the licensee did not ensure the above requirement was met as evidenced by facility staff not responding to residents timely. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a written statement detailing the facilities plan to train staff on responding to the residents’ emergency call button timely to the Fresno CCL office by the POC due date.
Apr 13, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings Resident's room is dirty Staff did not provided resident with adequate bedding Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs Resident's bathroom has no hand soap Resident's TV is in disrepair
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Consistent interviews with staff revealed that R1 would frequently remove R1’s hearing aid due to the hearing aid making a “whistling” noise in R1’s ear. While R1 resided at the facility, staff found R1’s hearing aid in various places including R1’s dining plate, R1’s sock and R1’s shoe. CONTINUED TO LIC9099C Unsubstantiated LPA was unable to tour R1’s apartment due to R1 no longer being in the facility. LPA viewed apartments belonging to other residents in the facility and did not observe the apartment rooms to be dirty, LPA observed hand soap, and resident TV’s to be in working order. Interviews with staff revealed that staff were trained on how to meet R1’s hygiene needs, however, R1 would refuse. Interviews with the Administrator revealed that resident families provide resident bedding and hand soap. Staff interviews revealed that staff will contact residents’ families when a resident is low on a specific item. Interviews with staff also revealed that soiled bedding is immediately washed, and some residents are provided with one set of bedding. The facility does have “loaner bedding” for a resident if it is needed. Based on observation and record review, the allegations: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings, Resident's room is dirty, Staff did not provided resident with adequate bedding, Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs, Resident's bathroom has no hand soap, and Resident's TV is in disrepair are UNSUBSTABTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220111085127
Apr 13, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Residents showering needs are not being met
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and staff, conducted a facility tour and reviewed records. Consistent statements from staff revealed that once a resident is given a shower, the attending staff will sign off on the shower schedule indicating that the resident was showered. Staff interviews revealed that “some residents will get a shower and others won’t”. LPA reviewed shower records at the above facility and observed the shower schedule was not updated and multiple rooms did not have a staff initial indicating the shower was completed. Substantiated Based on interviews conducted with staff and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation: Residents showering needs are not being met is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A deficiency is being cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, see attached 9099D. An exit interview was conducted, and a Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022 · control 24-AS-20211130111055
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2022
(f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (4) Personal assistance and care as needed by the resident and as indicated in the pre-admission appraisal, with those activities of daily living such as dressing, eating, bathing and assistance with taking prescribed medications… This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were assisted with activities of daily living such as bathing as evidenced by facility shower logs and consistent staff statements. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a written statement detailing the steps the facility will take to ensure the requirements of Basic Services are met to the Fresno CCL office by the POC due date.
Apr 13, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 04/13/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management- Deficiencies Inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. The purpose of this visit is to follow up on 6 incident reports that were not submitted to the Fresno CCL office with 7 days of occurrence. An incident that occurred on 01/22/2022 was reported on 02/02/2022. Incidents that occurred on the following dates were reported on 03/02/2022: 2/22/2022, 02/21/2022, 02/19/2022, 02/14/2022, and 02/18/2022. Based on record review, a deficiency is being cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, see attached 809D. Exit interview conducted and Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were reviewed and provided to Administrator, Pamela Hamilton, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2022
(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence… This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not furnish a written incident reports within seven days of occurrence as evidenced by the 6 incident reports that were submitted after the 7-day time frame.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a written statement detailing steps the facility will take to ensure that the requirements of section 87211 Reporting Requirements are met to the Fresno CCL office by the POC due date.
Mar 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility neglect resulting in resident developing infection. Facility staff did not observe change in resident's health condition. Resident's bathing needs were not met while in care.
This is an amended report. On 03/09/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced at the above facility to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pam Hamilton. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the allegations: Facility neglect resulting in resident developing infection, Facility staff did not observe change in resident's health condition and Resident's bathing needs were not met while in care are UNSUBSTANTIATED. CONTINUED TO LIC9099C Unsubstantiated This is an amended report Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report will be provided via email due to COVID-19 precautionary measures. Facility Representative signature on file.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2022 · control 24-AS-20211129152314
Feb 24, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
An informal meeting was held on 02/24/2022 at the Fresno Regional Office. The purpose of the office meeting was to discuss recently identified issues associated with the operation of the facility. The informal conference process was explained during the meeting. The following were in attendance: Diane Navarro, Regional Director of Operations (RDO) Pamela Hamitlon, Executive Director (ED) Melinda Hoffmann, Licensing Program Manager Sergiy Pidgirny, Licensing Program Manger Alexandria Walton, Licensing Program Analyst During this meeting the following issues discussed: Recent deficiencies Staffing concerns The Department offered to submit a referral to the Technical Support Program (TSP), as they may be able to assist in bringing the facility back to substantial compliance. The offer to submit a referral was accepted by the RDO and ED. At the conclusion of this meeting, the Department will submit a referral to TSP.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2022
20212 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 3, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not wearing masks
On 11/03/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Walton arrived unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint investigation at the above faciltiy. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Executive Director (ED). LPA met with ED, Pamela Hamilton and Resident Service Director (RSD), Olaf Becker. During today's visit, LPA conducted a facility tour with ED and RSD. During the facility tour, LPA observed DS1 to be wearing a facial covering improperly. DS2 and DS3 were observed to not be wearing facial coverings. Front desk staff and care providers were observed to be wearing facial coverings during this inspection. Based on observation, the facility failed to protect the personal rights of clients in care to receive safe and healthful accommodations and engaged in conduct inimical to the health, welfare, and safety of clients in care... CONTINUED TO LIC9099C Substantiated in that 3 out 4 dining room staff were observed to be not wearing facial coverings and wearing facial coverings improperly in violation of official government orders requiring the wearing of face coverings while working under specified conditions. A deficiency is being cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Section 87468.1. An exit interview was conducted and a Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with Executive Director. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided via email and an electronic read receipt confirms receiving these documents. Facility Representative signature on file.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2021 · control 24-AS-20210820151154
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 3, 2021
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)(2): Residents... shall have all of the following personal rights:(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the facility did not ensure staff are wearing facial coverings as mandated when it was observed that 3 out of 4 dining staff were not wearing facial coverings during the lunch period. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a plan detailing steps the facility will take to ensure staff wear face masks while in the facility as mandated, by 12/03/2021.
Jul 14, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in fracture.
ON 07/14/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Pamela Hamilton. During this visit, LPA conducted staff interviews. Based on record review and interviews, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2021 · control 24-AS-20210308092805
131 of 155 beds were occupied at the March 19, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Westmont Mgr Gp LLC, Gp of Fresno Ops;Westmont Lvng, licensed since 2019.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 58
- Total complaints
- 31
- Substantiated allegations
- 14
- Type A citations
- 5
- Type B citations
- 7
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 5 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 7 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 14 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 31 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Westmont of Fresno
Is Westmont of Fresno licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Westmont of Fresno licensed for?
155 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Westmont of Fresno been cited?
5 Type A and 7 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 58 state visits over the same years.
Is Westmont of Fresno still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Westmont of Fresno cost?
$3,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,350–$3,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Fresno that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,346 to $4,271 a month, and the middle figure is $3,600 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Westmont of Fresno take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Westmont Mgr Gp LLC, Gp of Fresno Ops;Westmont Lvng, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Westmont Lvng — at least 3 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
San Joaquin Valley Rehabilitation Hospital is 0.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Westmont of Fresno keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 20 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Westmont of Fresno license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “WESTMONT OF FRESNO”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #107208908. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 155 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Westmont Mgr Gp LLC, Gp of Fresno Ops;Westmont Lvng, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 58 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 5 Type A and 7 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 58 state visits in that period.
- 31 complaints and 14 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 15, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Fresno County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,395 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,195 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,600 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,000–$4,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$4,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Fresno County