Cedarbrook Memory Care Community is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fresno, Fresno County, California — state license #107206749, licensed for 68 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 30 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 18, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

63 homes in view

Cedarbrook Memory Care Community

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 68 residents · Fresno, CA · Fresno County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #107206749, held since 2014 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1425 E. Nees Ave · Fresno, Fresno County
Phone
(559) 412-2299
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, AMBULATORY OR NON-AMBULATORY. BEDRIDDEN FIRE CLEARANCE GRANTED FOR EIGHT (8) IN ROOMS 13, 15, 17 AND 19 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR TWENTY (20).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 30 times and filed 30 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 18, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 18, 2026
Occupancy at the June 17, 2025 visit
58 of 68 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 20, 2022 to June 17, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 19 of 30 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that staff has a criminal clearance

On June 17, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas. The purpose of the visit was to open a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that the facility Licensee does not ensure that staff has a criminal clearance. Based on record review it has been determined that the facility does ensure that staff has a criminal clearance, it is determined the allegation is unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Licensee does not ensure that staff has a criminal clearance” We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250612152957
Apr 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not permitting resident to leave the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted a case management investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegation: Staff are not permitting resident to leave the facility is UNFOUNDED. Resident 1 (R1) and residents are permitted to leave facility under the supervision for resident safety. R1 during investigation was out with family member, documented proof demonstrates multiple outings. Other residents were on a field trip outside the facility as well. Staff 1 (S1) demonstrated the check in and check out process for residents and responsible party. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Staff are not permitting resident to leave the facility). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis therefore we have dismissed the complainthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250204154917
Apr 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not correctly administering medications

On 10/04/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Sarah Dennis - Executive Director and Samantha Keith - Director of Resident Services, stated the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff is not correctly administering medications. Based on observation and records review R1 received medication as listed in Central Medications Records Log. LPA requested to review medications. Samantha Keith reviewed medications with LPA. Per review no issues with medication found. Although these allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. A copy of the report was provided to the licensee, No deficiencies issued, exit interview conducted. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240823132720
Oct 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident’s catheter is properly maintained.

On 10/04/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Sarah Dennis - Executive Director and Samantha Keith - Director of Resident Services, stated the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident’s catheter is properly maintained. LPA conducted interview with R1 observed R1 ambulating and with no hose that would pose fall risk. Reviewed records for R1: Based on R1 facility notes, the monitoring of catheter is recorded. R1 Service Plan also indicates that, R1 has been on home health since admission. Although these allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. A copy of the report was provided to the licensee, No deficiencies issued, exit interview conducted. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240827154040
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff keep resident's restrooms locked. Staff are not providing residents with adequate food portions. Staff are not providing residents drinking water. Staff do not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met. Staff are not providing residents with activities.

On 09/26/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with Samantha Keith Director of Resident Services, stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out, observed clients in care, and discused allegations with DRS. Allegation: Staff keep resident's restrooms locked. Based off observations and interviews on 7/18/24 during facility visit resident’ s room restrooms checked and found unlocked for use. Allegation: Staff are not providing residents with adequate food portions. Based of observation, staff interview and records review R1 received three meals a day and additionally provided regular snacks which were documented by facility staff. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240718061012
May 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with obtaining medical care

On 12/28/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Director of Resident Services, Samantha Keith, explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegations. Administrator was notified of Licensing visit. Allegation: Staff did not assist resident with obtaining medical care. During this investigation LPA reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, and Administrator. Facility records and witnesses confirmed that medical care was provided to resident in need. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, no citations were issued during this visit. Visit report signed and copy of this report provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231002141122
Aug 23, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged residents medication Staff gave resident medication from another resident

On 08/23/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gorban arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Sarah Dennis. LPA toured facility with AD, reviewed resident files and discussed findings. Allegation Staff mismanaged resident’s medication. During the course of the investigation LPA reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff, administrator and reporting party. Resident ran out of his medications too soon due to not ingesting them. Based on department investigation, observation and records review this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Report continues on the LIC90999-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 23, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230512134934
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file30typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2014.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020255702024780202355020225702021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Fresno County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (559) 412-2299

Is Cedarbrook Memory Care Community licensed?

Yes — Cedarbrook Memory Care Community is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fresno (Fresno County): California license #107206749, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 68 residents. State records list 30 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 18, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Cedarbrook Memory Care Community care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cedarbrook Memory Care Community with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, AMBULATORY OR NON-AMBULATORY. BEDRIDDEN FIRE CLEARANCE GRANTED FOR EIGHT (8) IN ROOMS 13, 15, 17 AND 19 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR TWENTY (20).

How much does Cedarbrook Memory Care Community cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Cedarbrook Memory Care Community's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Fresno County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Cedarbrook Memory Care Community accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Cedarbrook Memory Care Community is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

58 of 68 beds occupied (85%) when the state visited on June 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Cedarbrook Memory Care Community?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 30 state visits and 30 dated documents since 2021 for Cedarbrook Memory Care Community; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that staff has a criminal clearance
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On June 17, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas. The purpose of the visit was to open a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that the facility Licensee does not ensure that staff has a criminal clearance. Based on record review it has been determined that the facility does ensure that staff has a criminal clearance, it is determined the allegation is unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Licensee does not ensure that staff has a criminal clearance” We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250612152957
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not permitting resident to leave the facility
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted a case management investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegation: Staff are not permitting resident to leave the facility is UNFOUNDED. Resident 1 (R1) and residents are permitted to leave facility under the supervision for resident safety. R1 during investigation was out with family member, documented proof demonstrates multiple outings. Other residents were on a field trip outside the facility as well. Staff 1 (S1) demonstrated the check in and check out process for residents and responsible party. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Staff are not permitting resident to leave the facility). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis therefore we have dismissed the complainCDSS inspection report, April 21, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250204154917

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not correctly administering medications
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/04/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Sarah Dennis - Executive Director and Samantha Keith - Director of Resident Services, stated the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff is not correctly administering medications. Based on observation and records review R1 received medication as listed in Central Medications Records Log. LPA requested to review medications. Samantha Keith reviewed medications with LPA. Per review no issues with medication found. Although these allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. A copy of the report was provided to the licensee, No deficiencies issued, exit interview conducted. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 4, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240823132720
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure resident’s catheter is properly maintained.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/04/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Sarah Dennis - Executive Director and Samantha Keith - Director of Resident Services, stated the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident’s catheter is properly maintained. LPA conducted interview with R1 observed R1 ambulating and with no hose that would pose fall risk. Reviewed records for R1: Based on R1 facility notes, the monitoring of catheter is recorded. R1 Service Plan also indicates that, R1 has been on home health since admission. Although these allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. A copy of the report was provided to the licensee, No deficiencies issued, exit interview conducted. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 4, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240827154040
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff keep resident's restrooms locked. Staff are not providing residents with adequate food portions. Staff are not providing residents drinking water. Staff do not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met. Staff are not providing residents with activities.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/26/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with Samantha Keith Director of Resident Services, stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out, observed clients in care, and discused allegations with DRS. Allegation: Staff keep resident's restrooms locked. Based off observations and interviews on 7/18/24 during facility visit resident’ s room restrooms checked and found unlocked for use. Allegation: Staff are not providing residents with adequate food portions. Based of observation, staff interview and records review R1 received three meals a day and additionally provided regular snacks which were documented by facility staff. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240718061012

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with obtaining medical care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/28/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Director of Resident Services, Samantha Keith, explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegations. Administrator was notified of Licensing visit. Allegation: Staff did not assist resident with obtaining medical care. During this investigation LPA reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, and Administrator. Facility records and witnesses confirmed that medical care was provided to resident in need. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, no citations were issued during this visit. Visit report signed and copy of this report provided for facility records. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231002141122
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged residents medication Staff gave resident medication from another resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/23/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gorban arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Sarah Dennis. LPA toured facility with AD, reviewed resident files and discussed findings. Allegation Staff mismanaged resident’s medication. During the course of the investigation LPA reviewed facility records, interviewed facility staff, administrator and reporting party. Resident ran out of his medications too soon due to not ingesting them. Based on department investigation, observation and records review this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Report continues on the LIC90999-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 23, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230512134934
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being overcharged for services
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/05/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPA met with Administrator, Sarah Dennis. During the course of the investigation, it was found that the facility has been charging R1 for gloves and incontinence supplies. Review of regulations and records revealed that the facility is allowed to charge for gloves and incontinence supplies. Based on interviews and record review, the allegation: Resident is being overcharged for services is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator, Sarah Dennis, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221205072226

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 30 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
30
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(559) 412-2299
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Cedarbrook Memory Care Community? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.