Grove, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fresno, Fresno County, California — state license #107209324, licensed for 130 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated May 6, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

70 homes in view

Grove, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 130 residents · Fresno, CA · Fresno County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #107209324, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7444 North Cedar Ave · Fresno, Fresno County
Phone
(801) 815-0808
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 130 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 130 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 6, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 2, 2026
Occupancy at the March 27, 2026 visit
77 of 130 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 7, 2024 to March 27, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
May 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not comply with reporting requirements. Staff did not provide requested record(s) to resident’s representative in a timely manner.

On 03/27/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit for the purpose of delivering the finding for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director - Norshell Brewer. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegations: Staff did not comply with reporting requirements and Staff did not provide requested record(s) to resident’s representative in a timely manner are found to be UNFOUNDED. Staff respond appropriately to incident involving resident. Report was filed and Due to memory/dementia issues it is unpredictable when resident’s may act out, but it is not due to lack of supervision. Based on the investigation it has been determined the allegations are UNFOUNDED meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened or are without a reasonable basis. The complaint has therefore been dismissed. An exit interview wasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260205114020
Mar 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident

On March 27, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Executive Director - Norshell Brewer. The purpose of the visit was to open a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that the facility, "Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident." Based on record review staff was immediately searching for resident 1 (R1), it has been determined that the facility does ensure R1 received medical care and determined the allegation is unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident” We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted a copy of the amended report provided to the Busthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260128115035
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed Staff due not ensure reporting requirements are being followed

On 05/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit to Administrator - Norshell Brewer. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and records reviews. Based on the information received, the allegations, Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed and Staff do not ensure reporting requirements are being followed are Unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator - Norshell Brewer whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document. No citations were issued at the time of this visit. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250312082833
May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication. Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed.

This is an amended report. On 09/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Norshell Brewer, explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegations. Allegation: Staff mismanaged resident’s medication. On 05/16/2024, during complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed staff and Administrator, and observed medications storage and dispensing for R1 and R2 accordingly. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240514083051
Aug 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet a resident's hygiene need while in care Staff did not provide a copy of the admission agreement to authorized representative Staff are not abiding to admission agreement

On 08/07/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Norshell Brewer and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not meet a resident's hygiene need while in care. Based on file review residents that require assistance with hygiene services documented in daily care notes. Per staff interview and records review, residents unable to provide selfcare, where assisted at different times. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9909-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240321112201
May 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file12typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026230202523020243302023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Fresno County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (801) 815-0808

Is Grove, The licensed?

Yes — Grove, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fresno (Fresno County): California license #107209324, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 130 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 6, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Grove, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Grove, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 130 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.

How much does Grove, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Grove, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Fresno County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Grove, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Grove, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

77 of 130 beds occupied (59%) when the state visited on March 27, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Grove, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2023 for Grove, The; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 27, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not comply with reporting requirements. Staff did not provide requested record(s) to resident’s representative in a timely manner.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 03/27/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit for the purpose of delivering the finding for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director - Norshell Brewer. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegations: Staff did not comply with reporting requirements and Staff did not provide requested record(s) to resident’s representative in a timely manner are found to be UNFOUNDED. Staff respond appropriately to incident involving resident. Report was filed and Due to memory/dementia issues it is unpredictable when resident’s may act out, but it is not due to lack of supervision. Based on the investigation it has been determined the allegations are UNFOUNDED meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened or are without a reasonable basis. The complaint has therefore been dismissed. An exit interview wasCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260205114020
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On March 27, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Executive Director - Norshell Brewer. The purpose of the visit was to open a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that the facility, "Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident." Based on record review staff was immediately searching for resident 1 (R1), it has been determined that the facility does ensure R1 received medical care and determined the allegation is unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident” We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted a copy of the amended report provided to the BusCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260128115035

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed Staff due not ensure reporting requirements are being followed
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 05/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit to Administrator - Norshell Brewer. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and records reviews. Based on the information received, the allegations, Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed and Staff do not ensure reporting requirements are being followed are Unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator - Norshell Brewer whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document. No citations were issued at the time of this visit. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250312082833

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident's medication. Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This is an amended report. On 09/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Norshell Brewer, explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegations. Allegation: Staff mismanaged resident’s medication. On 05/16/2024, during complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed staff and Administrator, and observed medications storage and dispensing for R1 and R2 accordingly. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 5, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240514083051
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet a resident's hygiene need while in care Staff did not provide a copy of the admission agreement to authorized representative Staff are not abiding to admission agreement
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/07/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Norshell Brewer and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out and observed residents in care. Once the tour was complete, LPA discussed the findings with the AD. Allegation: Staff did not meet a resident's hygiene need while in care. Based on file review residents that require assistance with hygiene services documented in daily care notes. Per staff interview and records review, residents unable to provide selfcare, where assisted at different times. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9909-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240321112201

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(801) 815-0808
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Grove, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.