Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Rafael, California

Licensed since 2008Licence #216803008
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,600–$6,950
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 14, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJanuary 14, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderTerra Linda Christian Homes, Inc.Since 2008 · 2 licensed homes

Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5 is a small care home in San Rafael — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2008.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5

Is Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5 cost?

$5,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,600–$6,950. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Rafael that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,500 to $9,000 a month, and the middle figure is $7,000 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. — at least 4 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Rafael is 0.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc. # 5 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “TERRA LINDA CHRISTIAN HOMES, INC # 5”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #216803008. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, 1 BEDRIDDEN ROOM #2. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,650a month to start

Likely $4,600–$6,950

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,650a month

Likely $4,600–$7,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,650likely $4,600–$6,950

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,600–$7,100
$5,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,350–$10,150
$7,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 8 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,050–$7,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 631 Bamboo Terrace, San Rafael, CA 94903Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2008. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on January 14, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
10
Most recent visit
January 14, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 19, 2025 to January 14, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2008.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020253402024110202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not seek timely medical

At approximately 1:30PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Staff Members, Ronalyn Ladio and Norman Quiambao. Administrator, Bella Nachor, arrived during visit at approximately 1:40PM. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegation was investigated, “Staff did not seek timely medical.” Complaint alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was observed to have difficulty walking on 11/14/2025. Report stated that caregivers were using a wheelchair with R1 to prevent falls since they were not steady on their feet with "wobbly legs." Per report, R1 is usually independent with mobilization and does not require the use of a wheelchair, cane, walker, etc. Report further stated that facility staff were asked if R1 had any new or worsening symptoms and they reported that R1 was fine, happy, and eating, etc. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099 When asked if the facility called 911, Complainant was told that there was no point to call 911 because R1 was fine. Per Complainant, faciity should have contacted 911 so R1 could be checked out by medical professionals since they had a history of stroke and weakness in legs was a new symptom. Review of R1's documents indicated that facility staff were to contact R1's home health agency in the event R1 experienced increased problems with balance. On 09/30/2025, 10/02/2025, and 10/07/2025, facility staff were instructed by R1's home health agency on the warning signs of stroke and who to contact if R1 experienced signs of stroke. Additional records showed that on 11/14/2025, emergency medical personnel conducted a stroke assessment for R1 where R1 denied being in pain and passed the stroke assessment. Interview conducted with Staff Member 1 (S1) stated that on 11/14/2025, R1 was observed to have unsteady gait by Staff Member 2 (S2). Due to this observation, S2 contacted S1 by phone. Interview further revealed that S1 conducted a stroke assessment over the phone with S2 who reported back their observations. Per S1, R1 was not slurring their speech, did not have drooping in their face, and did not show weakness in their arms. R1 was also not reporting any pain or dizziness, any issues with vision, and ate well during breakfast. S1 also stated that they conducted the stroke assessment two additional times on 11/14/2025 - once via video call and again during their scheduled shift at the facility. During the video call assessment, S1 noted that R1 appeared to have normal behavior apart from their unsteady gait. During the assessment conducted during their scheduled shift, S1 observed R1 to have no complaints of pain and was able to walk by themselves to the restroom without supervision. Interview conducted with Staff Member 2 (S2) stated that on 11/14/2025, they observed R1 to be "walking wobbly." Per S2, R1 denied being in pain or discomfort. Interview further corroborated statements made by S1. Per S2, they contacted S1 about R1's gait and S1 performed a stroke assessment where S2 relayed their observations verbally over the phone. S2 contacted S1 via video call so S1 could conduct a stroke assessment visually where they determined that R1 did not have any apparent signs of stroke. Interview conducted with Home Health Agency Staff stated that on 11/14/2025, they conducted a stroke assessment with R1 and did not observe any stroke symptoms apart from R1's unsteady gait. Based on interviews conducted, record review, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. A finding that a complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026 · control 21-AS-20251118090736
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not get timely medical care for resident

At approximately 9:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Staff Members, Elena Mendoza and Ana Renderos. Licensee, Ana Bautista, and Administrator, Bella Nachor, arrived during visit at approximately 9:55AM. Licensee left facility at approximately 11:40AM. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The Department investigated the following allegations, “Staff did not get timely medical care for resident.” Complaint alleged that Resident 1 (R1) had a fall and sustained bruising to their face, back, and bottom. Complaint also stated that R1 was on hospice and facility should have contacted 911 because R1 was “black and blue.” Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099 Incident Report for R1 received on 05/30/2024 stated that R1 had an unwitnessed fall on 05/27/2024 and sustained a small cut to their eyebrow. Report further stated facility notified R1’s responsible party and contacted Hospice for further instructions. Based on staff interviews conducted, facility staff applied first aid and contacted the hospice nurse. Per staff interviews, the nurse conducted a telephone assessment and determined that R1 did not have a head injury since R1 was able to respond appropriately. Per facility documents, R1’s hospice agency visited on 05/28/2025 for a follow-up. Review of hospice documents indicated that R1 denied hitting their head and denied having post-fall pain. Based on record review, interviews conducted, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. A finding that a complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents. Continued from LIC9099A LPA conducted interview with R1’s Responsible Party. Per Responsible Party, they have had no concerns regarding R1’s care at the facility. They have never observed R1 to be bruised or “black and blue,” on their back, bottom, or face. Responsible Party stated that they have seen sores or bruises on R1 before but they have always been aware of where the injuries came from. Responsible Party further stated that the facility provides them with a report about R1 every day and that they have never found or observed loose pills at the facility or pills in R1’s pockets. Responsible Party stated that the information being investigated is false and could not be true. Based on record review, interviews conducted, and observations made, these allegations is Unfounded. An allegation that is Unfounded, means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250923154348
Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

At approximately 9:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management - Deficiencies visit and met with Staff Members, Elena Mendoza and Ana Renderos. Licensee, Ana Bautista, and Administrator, Bella Nachor, arrived during visit at approximately 9:55AM. Licensee left facility at approximately 11:40AM. At approximately 9:45AM, LPA observed that PM and Bedtime medications were pre-poured for four residents. Per conversation with Staff Member, the medications were poured the night before on 11/18/2025 and placed in the medication cups this morning, on 11/19/2025. LPA discussed regulation with Licensee, Administrator, and Staff Member. All parties stated their understanding that medications must be poured during the appropriate time frame. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC809D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 1, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care:(h)The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:(5) Each resident's medication shall be stored in its originally received container. No medications shall be transferred between containers. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on observations and interview conducted, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Four residents had medications pre-poured over 24 hours in advance. This is a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit proof of in-service training regarding regulation. Training to include: Training to include Date,Topic, Staff Names, Staff Role, and Signatures. Proof of training/supporting documents to be submitted by POC Due Date of 12/01/2025.

Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

At approximately 1:40PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a 1-Year Required Visit and met with Staff Members, Elena Mendoza and Glyzelle Recella. Designated Representative, Bella Nachor, arrived during visit at approximately 2:30PM. LPA reviewed resident medication. Medication was found to be centrally stored and secure. No Deficiencies Cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Administrator/Designated Representative. Signature on form confirms receipt of documentsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2025
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 8:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Required Visit and met with Staff Members, Elena Mendoza and Glyzelle Recella. Designated Representative, Bella Nachor, arrived during visit at approximately 9:15AM. Licensee, Ana Belle Bautista, arrived during visit at approximately 10:00AM and left facility around 11:15AM. Facility serves residents with dementia and has a plan of operation for dementia care and programming on file. Facility has an approved fire clearance and capacity for 6 non-ambulatory residents where 1 can be bedridden in Bedroom #2. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 3 individuals. Upon arrival, LPA was informed that there were 5 residents in care and 2 staff members on-site. At approximately 9:00AM, LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that Staff Member 1 (S1) was not associated to the facility per regulation. Administrator provided proof of transfer paperwork submitted to Regional Office to associate S1 dated 05/23/2025. LPA to follow up on S1's association. LPA conducted a walk-though of the facility with Administrator. LPA observed the following: Facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Facility had emergency lighting. Facility is a 1 story building with 5 Resident bedrooms, a staff room, 2 1/2 bathrooms, and common spaces. Facility has an Infection Control plan on file. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations. LPA observed multiple instances of unlabeled food in facility’s fridge and freezer. LPA also identified freezer burned food and expired canned goods in facility's cabinet (deficiency cited, regulation 87555(a)). There was an appropriate supply of cleaning products, linens, hygiene products and paper products available for Residents. Mattress pads were in place or available for Resident use. Hot water temperatures for all sinks in facility were within Title 22 regulations of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Fire extinguishers were last inspected November 2023 (deficiency cited, regulation 87202(a)). Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operational. Facility's last emergency/disaster drill was conducted September 2025. Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPA reviewed staff files and resident files. All files were all found to be well organized, thorough and contained the required documentation. Staff files had current First Aid and CPR certification. Administrator's Certificate for Ana Belle Bautistia (7000300740) and Bella Nachor (7008140740) was current with an expiration date of 3/12/2027 and 05/27/2027. LPA discussed the following topics: Reporting Requirements PIN regarding 911 protocols PIN regarding dementia regulations LPA requested the following documents to update facility file: Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC 308) Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC 610E) Updated Personnel Report (LIC 500) Updated Liability Insurance Active and Current Administrator Certificate Documents to be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) by due date of 11/02/2025. LPA unable to complete Annual Visit. Annual Continuation Visit to be conducted at a later date. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC809D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Administrator/Designated Representative. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Nov 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

11/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Loera conducted an unannounced Annual Required – 1 yr. inspection visit for this facility. Facility has an emergency disaster plan as required. Facility has an infection control plan as required. There are currently 6 residents in care. Facility approved/cleared for 6 non-ambulatory, 1 bedridden (bedroom #2), and hospice waiver for 3. At approximately 2:10pm, LPA and staff member toured the building and grounds. The facility was found to be at a comfortable temperature. LPA observed a 2 day supply of perishable and 7 day supply of non-perishable food. Refrigerated food was found to be stored in a safe manner being labeled and dated. Medications were found to be centrally stored. All rooms were equipped with lighting, night stand, and chest of drawers. All rooms were in good repair. Extra hygiene products and linens were available. Water temperature in sinks accessible to residents in care were measured at 107.8 and 109.5 degrees F which is within the range of 105 to 120 degrees F. Fire extinguishers were last inspected 11/2023. Smoke/Carbon Monoxide detectors located throughout the facility were tested and operational. Toxins, sharps and other items that could pose threat if available to residents in care were located in a kitchen drawer and were found to be secured. LPA conducted spot medication count and found all prescription medication to be properly recorded on the Centrally Stored Medication Record. LPA conducted a review of 3 resident records. All records had the required documentation. LPA conducted review of 3 staff records/training. Upon a review of staff records, LPA found all staff to have required annual and initial training as well as current 1st Aid & CPR certification on file. continued on LIC809-C No deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: LIC500- Personnel Report LIC308- Designation of Responsibility Liability Insurance Updated Lease Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Jill Nakagawa arrived at Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc #5 unannounced for the purpose of conducting a Required-1 year inspection. LPA was greeted at the door by House Manager Jessica Tadaya. LPA toured the facility with House Manager. Facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Fire Extinguishers was found to be last charged on 11/10/2023. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were found to be operational during the visit. Hot water temperature measured 109 degrees which is within Title 22 acceptable regulation of 105 to 120 degrees F. The facility serves residents with dementia and has a plan of operation for special care and programming. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable food as required by Title 22 Regulations. Food stored in the kitchen refrigerator were properly stored as per regulations on this day at the time of the visit. Toxins are stored in the closet in the hallway locked and inaccessible to residents in care. There was a supply of cleaners, hygiene products and paper products available for residents. The bathrooms designated for residents at the facility were supplied with paper towels and hand soap. Bathrooms were equipped with necessary grab bars, and non-slip floors/mats. All bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings. Resident’s beds were outfitted with mattress pads as required by Title 22. Medications are stored and locked in cabinet in kitchen. Continued on 809-C Continued from 809..... The backyard was free of debris and provided lots of space for residents to move about and socialize. There were several fruit trees which the residents enjoy watching them change from season to season. At the time of visit, residents were socializing together in the living room, watching a Christmas movie and enjoying conversation and popcorn. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's Required 1- Year inspection. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Terra Linda Christian Homes, Inc., licensed since 2008, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Marin County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Marin County