Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Sweet Home Senior Living Facility

Small home·Licensed for 6·Van Nuys, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #197609845Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 11, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitJanuary 7, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderSweet Home Senior Living 1, Inc.Since 2020 · 2 licensed homes

Sweet Home Senior Living Facility is a small care home in Van Nuys — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2020. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Sweet Home Senior Living Facility

Is Sweet Home Senior Living Facility licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Sweet Home Senior Living Facility licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Sweet Home Senior Living Facility been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Sweet Home Senior Living Facility still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Sweet Home Senior Living Facility cost?

$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Sweet Home Senior Living Facility take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Sweet Home Senior Living 1, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Sweet Home Senior Living 1, Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Valley Presbyterian Hospital is 2.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Sweet Home Senior Living Facility keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Sweet Home Senior Living Facility license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SWEET HOME SENIOR LIVING FACILITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197609845. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Sweet Home Senior Living 1, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR FOUR(4) TOTAL BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS #1, #2, AND #3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR(4).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,200a month to start

Likely $3,450–$5,200

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,200a month

Likely $3,450–$5,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,450–$5,200

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,400
$4,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,050–$8,550
$6,200
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$6,100.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6456 Varna Avenue, Van Nuys, CA 91401Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2020. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 7, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
January 7, 2026
Occupied · July 11, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 29, 2023 to July 11, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202434020231202022220

The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 11:25AM. The LPA met with the Licensee Lusine Smrkiyan and Coordinating Manager (CM) Marine Bekyan and informed them of the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 11:43AM, the LPA and Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The facility is a single-story residential home on shared property with other related facilities. The following was observed: OUTDOOR AREA: The surrounding grounds had multiple shaded patio areas equipped with furniture in good condition for resident and visitor use. The front yard had a driveway with a remote operated gate as well as a door for everyday use. There was one (1) emergency exit door located on one (1) side of the facility that led to the front yard. Exits and passageways were free of obstructions. The facility had additional gates with access to the neighboring three (3) facilities that the Licensee also operates. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. Required postings were observed on the entryway wall. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature throughout the visit. Nightlights were observed throughout the hallways. There was a closet located in the hallway which contained laundry machines in operating condition and extra supplies of linens. Report Continued on LIC 809-C KITCHEN: The LPA observed knives and medications stored inaccessible in a locked drawer and cleaning supplies secured under the sink. An additional supply of medications and files were also secured in a cabinet. Kitchen appliances were clean and in operable condition. The facility had a supply of perishable and non-perishable food, as well as emergency food and water stored in the office. Food in the refrigerator and freezer were observed to be properly stored with labels and dates. Grocery shopping occurs every two (2) weeks, sometimes more when needed. BEDROOMS/RESTROOMS: There were four (4) total bedrooms: two (2) shared and two (2) private. Bedroom #3 had a direct exit to the outside and was approved for one (1) bedridden resident. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. There were three (3) total restrooms in the facility: two (2) private and one (1) shared. Restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-slip surfaces. All restrooms were sufficiently stocked with soap, paper products, and displayed hand washing signs. Hygiene products were secured in each restroom. Hot water was tested and measured between 110.1 degrees F and 115.2 degrees F which is within the required range per regulation. MEDICATIONS: Medication review began at 11:57AM. Medications were centrally stored and kept inaccessible in the kitchen. Medications were observed for two (2) residents. Medications were labeled and checked for expiration dates and were properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. RECORDS: Record review began at 12:47PM. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, physician's report, admissions agreement, and consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. Report Continued on LIC 809-C INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today's visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and emergency disaster plan. Both documents were observed to be complete and reviewed annually as required. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility and were last serviced on 05/16/2025. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly, with the last documented drill on 12/20/2025. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors as well as fire doors were tested at 11:55AM and were operational. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2026
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. At 1:00 p.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Administrator Marine Bekyan and the reason for the visit was explained. Licensee representative, Lusine Srmikyan arrived later during the visit. At 1:08 p.m., the LPA, along with the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen and dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food. At 1:14 p.m., hot water measured at 108.9-degree Fahrenheit. Medications and first aid kits are located in a locked kitchen drawer. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with four (4) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms for resident's use. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. At 1:19 p.m., hot water measured between 108.3 and 109.8-degree Fahrenheit all within the required range. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout bathrooms and facility to promote hand washing. DOCUMENTS: LPA obtained the following documents, LIC 9020 Resident roster, LIC 500 Personnel report, and current liability insurance. Report continued on LIC 809-C. Report continued from LIC9099.... COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last serviced on 05/14/2024. At 1:22 p.m., fire alarms/ carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Laundry units are located in one of the hallways. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. The last emergency disaster drill took place on 09/20/2024 and are conducted quarterly, with their next one scheduled for Monday, December 30th. Activities were observed in the common areas. OUTDOOR SPACE/ GARAGE: At 1:28 p.m., the LPA observed the back patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use including a table and chairs. There is a self latching gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. There are no bodies of water on the premises. LPA observed an adequate amount of emergency food and water. Garage is used as an office and is maintained locked at all times. RECORD REVIEW: Starting at 1:32 p.m., the LPA reviewed resident records for five (5) out of five (5) residents. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, and consent forms. All files were in order. The LPA conducted a personnel file review for (3) staff regularly scheduled and reviewed for, but not limited to: health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files in order. MEDICATION AUDIT: A medication audit for five (5) residents was conducted at 2:29 p.m. and the following was observed. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a locked drawer in the kitchen. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored, and locked inaccessible to residents in care. PRNs have physicians order on file. Medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. No medication errors observed at this time. INTERVIEWS: Two (2) staff interviews were conducted. Interviews revealed that staff are knowledgeable in resident rights, forms of abuse, and reporting procedures. Two (2) resident and visiting family member interviews were conducted during the inspection. No concerns noted at the time of the visit. No deficiencies were cited during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 27, 2024
Jul 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility retained resident with a prohibited health condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at the facility today to deliver findings. At 3:09 p.m., the LPA met with the Licensee and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit on 1/30/2024, between 9:25 a.m. and 10:45 a.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a facility tour and reviewed records and obtained copies of pertinent documents. The LPA also conducted an interview with the Licensee. On 02/22/2024, the LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1 (R1’s) Home Health. On 2/23/2024, the LPA conducted a file review of Resident #1 (R1’s) documents such as but not limited to, admission agreement, and medical records. On 03/13/2024, the LPA conducted a subsequent visit between 2:45 p.m. and 3:25 p.m. and conducted an interview with R1 and received copies of pertinent documents. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Facility retained resident with a prohibited health condition. On 01/29/2024, the Department received a complaint alleging that the Licensee admitted Resident #1 (R1) to the facility with an unstageable wound/ ulcer. R1 was admitted to Sweet Home Senior Living Facility on 01/26/2024. Prior to living at the facility, R1 was admitted to Country Villa Sheraton Nursing Center, a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) from 12/28/2023 to 01/26/2024. R1 was admitted to the SNF for rehab, and received physical therapy, occupational therapy, wound care and medical management. R1 discharged themselves from the SNF against medical advice and was admitted to Sweet Home Senior Living Facility with the plan of having home health. During R1’s stay at the SNF, R1 developed a pressure ulcer on their sacrum. Interview conducted with the Licensee stated that the Licensee received a referral for R1 through a placement agency and the Licensee went to go visit R1 at the SNF to get more information regarding R1’s level of care on 01/25/2024. The Licensee said that the SNF nurse stated that R1 had a wound stage 3 or 4 but did not provide any documentation or paperwork to support the claim. The Licensee stated that R1 would be getting home health through Kaiser Permanente and wound care would be provided for R1. The Licensee believed at the time of R1’s admission to the facility that R1 had a stage 2 wound. Per record review, R1’s ulcer is located on R1’s sacrum and is listed as unspecified in R1’s Kaiser Progress Notes (dated 01/19/2024) and Skilled Nursing Facility Discharge Summary (dated 01/24/2024). R1’s sacrum ulcer was noted as unstageable only in one document, Progress Notes dated 01/22/2024 from Kaiser. R1’s Progress Notes were not provided to the Licensee prior to admission. The documents that the Licensee obtained from the SNF include R1’s Admission Record, Interdisciplinary Discharge Summary and Kaiser Permanente Skilled Nursing Facility Discharge Instructions. None of the listed documents noted R1’s ulcer as unstageable. Although it was alleged that the Licensee was verbally told about R1’s unstageable ulcer, the SNF or Kaiser did not provide documentation to the Licensee that documented R1’s ulcer as unstageable nor did the Licensee obtained Kaiser documents. Additionally, the LPA conducted an interview with R1’s Home Health on 2/22/2024. Interview revealed that R1’s wound improved and had no concerns regarding R1 care at the facility. Home health records did not list the stage of the ulcer. Continued on LIC 9099-C. The LPA did not have sufficient documentation to support the allegation. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. The LPA had several conversations with the Licensee regarding pressure injuries, healing wounds, and Restricted Health Conditions. The LPA educated the Licensee on the importance of not accepting residents with Stage 3, Stage 4 pressure injuries and unstageable wounds/ injuries unless with a hospice waiver and with resident receiving care for the pressure injury from a physician or an appropriately skilled professional. The LPA reminded the Licensee that she should be obtaining pertinent documents for all residents including hospital records. The LPA told the Licensee if a hospital or SNF verbally state that a resident has any kind of wounds or ulcers, that the Licensee needs to follow up appropriately and ensure that the resident is appropriate for the assisted living. The LPA also emphasized the importance of the Licensee obtaining home health and hospice plan of care and wound assessment documents to keep in resident’s file. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240129144129
Jul 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced Case Management - Annual Continuation at the facility today continuing the inspection that began on 01/27/2024. At 10:00 a.m., the LPA met with the Coordinating Manager. At 10:20 a.m., the Licensee arrived at the facility. RECORD REVIEW: Starting at 10:30 a.m., the LPA reviewed resident records for five (5) out of five (5) residents. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, and consent forms. All files were in order. The LPA conducted a personnel file review for all staff regularly scheduled and reviewed for, but not limited to: health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. Personnel files reviewed were observed to be in compliance. At 2:09 p.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with the Licensee for five (5) residents. No errors observed during the review. At 2:26 p.m., the LPA conducted a brief physical plant tour to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report of provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2024

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jan 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. At 9:15 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 9:40 a.m., the Licensee arrived at the facility. At 9:45 a.m., the LPA, along with the Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen and dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. At 9:47 a.m., hot water measured at 107.1-degree Fahrenheit. Medications and first aid kits are located in a locked kitchen drawer. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with four (4) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms for resident's use. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. At 9:49 a.m., hot water measured between 104.8 and 109.8-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout bathrooms and facility to promote handwashing. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last serviced on 05/01/2023. At 10:19 a.m., fire alarms/ carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Laundry units are located in one of the hallways. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. Continued on LIC 809-C. OUTDOOR SPACE: At 9:54 a.m., the LPA observed the back patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Between 10:11 a.m. and 10:18 a.m., the LPA conducted interviews with one (1) staff and four (4) residents. The Administrator’s certificate is active and expires on 03/16/2025 Due to time constraints the LPA will return to complete the annual at a later date. No deficiencies were observed at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2024
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Dec 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an unexplained injury while in care. Resident developed a rash while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 9:45 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:15 a.m., the Licensee and Coordinating Manager arrived at the facility. During the initial visit conducted on 12/02/2021 between 11:20 a.m. and 1:15 p.m., LPA Angel Ascencio conducted an interview with staff, conducted physical plant tour and obtained copies of pertinent documents. On 12/21/2023, at 1:50 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a telephonic interview with the Licensee. On 12/21/2023, at 3:10 p.m., LPA Peraldi attempted to conduct a telephonic interview with Resident #1’s (R1’s) case manager. Additionally, on 07/14/2023 and 12/21/2023, LPA Peraldi reviewed R1’s records. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegations: Resident sustained an unexplained injury while in care and Resident developed a rash while in care. On 12/01/2023, the Department received a complaint alleging that Resident #1 (R1) had developed skin damage and right ankle rashes while at the facility and “was unable to provide meaningful history.” Per record review, R1 was admitted to the facility on 09/01/2021 and was on home health services. Interview with the Licensee revealed that R1 was on home health services for wound care. The Licensee stated that prior to R1’s death, that R1 changed from home health services to hospice services. Per record review, R1’s home health services included wound care for R1’s buttocks and coccyx area and stage 2 on right ankle. Based on record review, it’s unclear when R1’s rashes developed and if R1 had any injuries while in care at the facility. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2023 · control 29-AS-20211201154331
Dec 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable death. Resident not accorded dignity in relationship with staff.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 9:45 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:15 a.m., the Licensee and Coordinating Manager arrived at the facility. During the initial visit conducted on 12/07/2021 between 12:00 p.m. and 3:45 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted an interview with the Licensee, conducted physical plant tour and obtained copies of pertinent documents. On 12/06/2021, a referral was made to Community Care Licensing Division's (CCLD) Investigation Branch (IB) however, the referral was not accepted. On 12/10/2021, at 1:50 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a telephonic interview Resident #1 (R1’s) Power of Attorney (POA). On 12/06/2021, 12/10/2021 and 03/03/2022, the LPA conducted a telephonic interviews with the complainant. Additionally, on 12/10/2021 and 03/28/2022 the LPA reviewed R1’s records. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Questionable death. On 12/06/2021, the Department received a complaint alleging that the facility caused the death of Resident #1 (R1) by overdosing R1 with morphine. Per record review, R1 was admitted to the facility on 09/28/2021 and received hospice services up until R1’s death on 12/01/2021. Per record review, R1’s Doctor’s Worksheet for Certificate of Death listed R1’s cause of death A) Cardiorespiratory arrest B) Dementia lewy body C) Atherosclerosis heart disease D) HTN. Record review of R1’s Pathology report dated 03/21/2022 did not include any abnormalities that could be a raise for concern. Interview with R1’s POA on 12/10/2021 did not raise any concerns regarding the care of R1. R1’s POA stated that R1’s POA was at the facility every day prior to R1’s death and had no issues with the intake of R1’s morphine. R1’s POA stated that R1’s POA communicated with R1’s doctors and hospice agency regarding R1’s medication and R1’s POA was in charge of R1’s medical care. Interview with the Licensee revealed that R1’s POA was very involved in R1’s care and medical care. The Licensee stated that the amount of morphine was given to R1 as instructed by R1’s doctor. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Resident not accorded dignity in relationship with staff. On 12/06/2021, the Department received a complaint alleging that the facility staff were "mean" to Resident #1 (R1). Interview with R1’s POA on 12/10/2021 did not raise any concerns regarding the treatment of R1. R1’s POA stated that the facility staff were “wonderful and the care was phenomenal.” Interview with the Licensee did not reveal any issues between staff and R1. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2023 · control 29-AS-20211206110628
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Sweet Home Senior Living 1, Inc., licensed since 2020, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County