Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Rosehaven 1License #306003893 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareRosehaven 1License #306003893 · 203 Calle Del Juego, San Clemente, CA · (949) 366-2599Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Orange County/San Clemente/Rosehaven 1
Map · 203 Calle Del Juego

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,900/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (949) 366-2599

    From the state licensing record · October 25, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

R1

Call Rosehaven 1

San Clemente · Licensed for 6

(949) 366-2599

From the state licensing record · October 25, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Clemente

Rosehaven 1

203 Calle Del Juego, San Clemente, CA 92672 · Licensed since 2008

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Rosehaven 1

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,900 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 25, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Hospiceup to 5 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 25, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · October 25, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 25, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Rosehaven 1: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,000

From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,900likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,000–$6,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,400
$7,400
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes14 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,600 to $8,500

$3,600$8,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

14 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,050–$8,200.

  • Harbor View EstateSan Clemente · 3.0 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Coastal Senior LivingSan Juan Capistrano · 3.1 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Talega TerraceSan Clemente · 3.6 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Adagio San JuanSan Juan Capistrano · 4.7 mi · Small home
    $8,500Listed on its own website · starting price for rooms · seen October 5, 2026
  • Vividus Senior LivingLaguna Niguel · 7.8 mi · Small home
    $5,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Niguel Hills Villa IILaguna Niguel · 8.0 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Orange County Care Home ILaguna Niguel · 8.0 mi · Small home
    $3,600Listed on its own website · care; flat rate · seen October 27, 2026
  • Adelanto Covenant CareLaguna Niguel · 8.2 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Seasons at Laguna - 2Laguna Niguel · 8.3 mi · Small home
    $8,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sunrise GardenLaguna Niguel · 8.5 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Brandon ManorLaguna Niguel · 8.8 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Serenity Health 2Laguna Niguel · 9.0 mi · Small home
    $8,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Kathryn Jane Residential Care FacilityMission Viejo · 9.7 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • TLC Elderly Residence 1Laguna Hills · 10.0 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

203 Calle Del Juego, San Clemente, CA 92672Address from the public record · October 25, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 25, 2026 · License #306003893 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 9 of 22 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document

Apr 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced visit to Rosehaven I. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the Annual Required inspection. LPA was allowed entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed for 6 non-ambulatory residents, of which one may be bedridden. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 5 residents and the home currently has 4 residents with 2 on hospice during today's visit. Administrator Jaya Pichika has submitted the administrator certificate renewal as of March 5, 2026. LPA Lyman along with Caregiver Larry Espansol toured the facility at 8:34 AM. Administrator Jaya Pichika arrived during the visit. LPA toured the physical plant, checked food service, reviewed records and the first aid kit. Facility appears to be clean, safe, and sanitary. The home consists of six resident bedrooms, one resident restroom, two common restrooms, one staff room, living room, dining room, and kitchen. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. LPA observed one resident with half bed rails and one with full bed rails. Resident restrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure and shower was free of mold/mildew. Water temperature measured between 122 and 125.2 degrees F in all facility restrooms. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked at time of visit. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. First aid kit had all the required elements including tweezers, thermometer, and scissors. The entry door into the garage is secured. LPA observed a locked storage area for cleaning supplies. Kitchen was inspected. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at time of visit. LPA observed sharps locked in a kitchen drawer. Fire extinguishers are fully charged. Kitchen appliances are operational during today's visit. CONT ON LIC809-C DATED 04/23/2026 LPA toured the outside grounds and there is ample shaded seating for residents. LPA observed ample emergency food supply. LPA reviewed the emergency disaster plan during the visit. Plan is thorough and complete. Facility provided documentation of last fire drill conducted on 02/20/2026 and drills are conducted quarterly. Facility provides activities in the form of exercise and games. At 9:15 AM, LPA reviewed four resident files and three staff files. Resident files contained required documents including admission agreements, physician reports and resident appraisals. Residents 1 and 4 do not have a current medical assessments in the file. Two out of three staff do not have current CPR/ First aid training. LPA reviewed medication storage and administration. Medications are stored in a locked cabinet and appear to be administered per physician order. Facility has a annual licensing fee due on 05/20/2026. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2026

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Jul 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 05/09/2025. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff and explained the reason for the visit. *Deficiency cited under Health and Safety Code 1569.625(b)(2) pertaining to Training has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87412(a) pertaining to Personnel Records has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(a) pertaining to Maintenance and Operation has been cleared. Licensee corrected noted items. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87203 pertaining to Fire safety has been cleared. Smoke detectors are operational during today's visit. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87463(h)(1) pertaining to Reappraisals has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87608(a)(3) pertaining to Postural Supports has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction. Licensee has been advised to maintain all items in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2025
May 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced visit to Rosehaven I. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the Annual Required inspection. LPA was allowed entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed for 6 non-ambulatory residents, of which one may be bedridden. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 5 residents and the home currently has 3 residents with none on hospice during today's visit. Administrator Jaya Pichika has a current administrator certificate expiring on 09/13/2025. LPA Lyman along with Caregiver Larry Espinol toured the facility at 10:58 AM. Administrator Jaya Pichika arrived during the visit. LPA toured the physical plant, checked food service, reviewed records and the first aid kit. Facility appears to be clean, safe, and sanitary. The home consists of six resident bedrooms, one resident restroom, two common restrooms, one staff room, living room, dining room, and kitchen. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. LPA observed two residents with a half bed rails. Resident restrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure and shower was free of mold/mildew. At 11:05 AM, LPA observed there are missing drawer pulls in the master restroom. Water temperature measured between 109.4 and 111 degrees F in all facility restrooms. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked at time of visit. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. First aid kit had all the required elements including tweezers, thermometer, and scissors. The entry door into the garage is secured. LPA observed a locked storage area for cleaning supplies. Kitchen was inspected. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at time of visit. LPA observed sharps locked in a kitchen drawer. Four out of six smoke detectors are inoperable. Fire extinguishers are fully charged. Kitchen appliances are operational during today's visit. CONT ON LIC809-C DATED 05/09/2025 LPA toured the outside grounds and there is ample shaded seating for residents. At 11:15 AM, LPA observed the exit gate does not latch shut. LPA observed ample emergency food and water supply. LPA reviewed the emergency disaster plan during the visit. Plan is thorough and complete. Facility provided documentation of last fire drill conducted on 04/25/2025 and drills are conducted quarterly. Facility provides activities in the form of exercise and games. At 11:30 AM, LPA reviewed three resident files and three staff files. Resident files contained required documents including admission agreements, physician reports and resident appraisals. Resident 2 does not have a current medical assessment in the file and two out of two residents with bed rails do not have a physician order for rails. One out of three staff do not have a personnel file and three out of three staff do not have current training. LPA reviewed medication storage and administration. Medications are stored in a locked cabinet and are being administered per physician order. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2025

20245 state visits · 6 documents

Nov 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 07/19/2024 and 09/18/2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff and explained the reason for the visit. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(a) pertaining to Maintenance and Operation has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. Licensee has been advised to maintain all items in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2024
Oct 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Alisa Ortiz, and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman, conducted an informal office meeting with Licensee Jaya Pichika to discuss general compliance concerns at the facility. The following items were discussed during the meeting: Staffing levels and schedule. Physical plant issues. Lack of communication between licensee and the department. Non-compliance with citations. Licensing fees Reporting requirements Licensee agrees as follows: Licensee to communicate with the department on all issues or concerns regarding facility operations. Licensee agrees to contact department for clarification and not make assumptions. Licensee to forward a copy of the LIC 500 to LPA by 10/14/2024 that ensures coverage during hours when residents require services. Facility will maintain compliance of Title 22 at all times and failure to maintain compliance may result in the department taking further action. During the visit, Licensee was offered technical support services with the department and Licensee agreed to a referral for the service. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 11, 2024
Sep 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 09/18/2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Licensee/ Administrator Jay Pichika and explained the reason for the visit. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87355(e)(1) pertaining to Criminal Background Clearance has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. Licensee has requested an extension to correct the following items: Renovation of master bathroom shower Repair of kitchen cupboard Repair of flooring in entryway. LPA has granted an extension to repair remaining items until 10/10/2024. Licensee has been advised of meeting in Orange County Regional Office on 10/11/2024 at 10:00 AM. Licensee has been advised to maintain all items in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2024
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 07/19/2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Marinell Bautis and explained the reason for the visit. Jay Pichika arrived during the visit. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(a) pertaining to Maintenance and Operation has been cleared. Licensee cleared noted items. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under H & S Code 1569.626(a)(1) pertaining to Dementia Training has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of training.. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87467(a)(1) pertaining to Care Plans has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction.. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87411(c)(1) pertaining to CPR has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction. Licensee to provide documented plan of completion for renovation by 09/23/2024. Licensee has been advised to maintain all items in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with a plan of correction visit (POC). LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Upon entry, LPA observed two staff present are not cleared or associated to facility. During the POC visit, LPA observed a broken kitchen cupboard, tile buckling on floor by front door, and a large pile of debris in the yard. LPA consulted with Licensee regarding staffing. Licensee indicates two staff will be arriving in the evening to work. LPA verified that both staff are cleared and associated to the facility. Licensee to forward a copy of the LIC 500 by close of business 09/23/2024. Licensee has been advised a meeting will be scheduled at the Orange County Regional office to discuss facility non-compliance. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 3, 2024

All individuals subject to a criminal record review.. shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption.. This req is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, Licensee failed to ensure two staff obtained criminal record clearance. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee to obtain criminal record clearance and association for Staff 1 and 2 and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 2, 2024

The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This req is not being met as evidenced by: Based on observation, Licensee failed to ensure facility is clean, safe and sanitary. LPA observed a broken cupboard, buckling tile, and debris in yard. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee to repair/ remove noted items and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

Jul 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Jesus Lopez. Administrator Jay Pichika arrive shortly after. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six residents, of whom all may be non-ambulatory, one of which may be bedridden. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. There were multiple issues with the physical plant- room 6 walkway was semi-obstructed with construction tools, a large mirror and construction debris. Additionally there was a toilet in front of the closet which contained dark brown water. Double vanity outside room six is not in working condition, per residents has not worked in weeks. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Sink in double vanity was not draining water. Shower floors had dark mold and non-slip pads were slimy. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications labeled and locked as required. No pool or body of water was present. Water temperature was measured at 113 degrees F. Per Jay, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present. First aid kit was complete. Resident records reviewed did not contain Needs and Services Plans. Staff records reviewed did not have current first aid training in two of two records. Additionally, LPA informed Administrator of annual fees due to the Department. Multiple deficiencies were provided on todays date and one technical violation. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, to whom a copy of this report,(LIC9099-x3), LIC9102, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 19, 2024

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 13 documents

20227 state visits · 9 documents

Sep 28, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced health and safety case management visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Antonio Gaspi and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPA toured the facility and spoke with residents. LPA observed fans in all resident rooms as well as common areas. LPA spoke with three out of four residents who confirmed the facility was appropriately cooled. Residents verbalized satisfaction with the facility and appeared happy and well taken care of. Facility temperature during today's visit was 73 degrees F. Based on the observations made during today's visit, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2022
Jul 29, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not follow physicians orders to transfer resident every 2 hours Staff did not provide resident's authorized representative with a copy of the Admission Agreement within the required time frame Staff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility today to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA Lyman met with Caregiver Brenda Castillo and discussed the reason for visit. Administrator Jaya Pichika arrived during the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as admission agreement and staff training. Regarding the allegations that staff do not follow physicians orders to transfer resident every 2 hours, staff did not provide resident's authorized representative with a copy of the Admission Agreement within the required time frame and Staff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) has a physician order dated 07/01/2022 indicating R1 is to be turned every two hours by facility staff. Two out of two staff state the resident is being turned every two hours. However, facility checklist for two hour turns indicate between July 1-12, 2022, it was not documented 24 times that the resident was turned. Additionally, witness indicates resident is not be turned regularly at night. Staff indicate their shift ends at 6 PM but work as needed to CONTINUED ON 9099C DATED 07/29/2022 Substantiated turn resident throughout the night. R1 admitted into the facility on 04/22/2022. Responsible Party states not receiving a copy of the admission agreement and Licensee/ Administrator admits to not providing a copy of the admission agreement. During the investigation, LPA reviewed staff training records. Two out of four facility staff do not have documented required training. Based on observations made and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of .Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2022 · control 22-AS-20220705085643

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 30, 2022

Basic services shall at a minimum include: Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on record review, Licensee failed to ensure care and supervision is being provided to R1. R1 has a physician order to turn resident every 2 hours. Facility documentation indicates R1 was not turned 24 times between July 1-12, 2022. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. Civil Penalty Assessed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit a detailed, written plan on ensuring resident is being turned every two hours per physician order and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(e) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 30, 2022

The licensee shall provide a copy of the signed and dated current admission agreement.., to the resident or the resident's representative, if any, immediately upon signing the admission agreement or modification...This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, Licensee failed to ensure an admission agreement was provided to R1/ Responsible Party. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee to provide a copy of the signed admission agreement to R1/ Responsible Party and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87412(c) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 12, 2022

Licensees shall maintain in the personnel records verification of required staff training and orientation. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on record review, Licensee failed to ensure verification of staff training is maintained. Two out of four staff do not have documentation of required training. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in are.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee to ensure all staff training is up to date and verification is maintained in staff file. Licensee to forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

Jul 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with complaint visit 22-AS-20220705085643. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Brenda Castillo and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator/ Licensee Jay Pichika arrived during the visit. During the course of the complaint visit, LPA met with Staff 1 (S1). S1 indicates working at facility for a week. LPA observed through Guardian and LIS that S1 is not associated to the facility. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violation is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 30, 2022

A licensee or applicant for a license may request a transfer of a criminal record clearance from one state licensed facility to another, or from Trust Line to a state licensed facility by providing the following documents to the Department: This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, Licensee failed to ensure S1 is associated to the facility. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSEDthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit LIC 9182 or associate the staff in the Guardian system and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

Jul 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 05/17/2022. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Antonio Gaspi and explained the reason for the visit. Jaya Pichika arrived during the visit. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(a) pertaining to Maintenance and Operation has been cleared. Licensee cleared noted items. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87506(d) pertaining to Resident Records has been cleared. Resident records are on-site during today's visit. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87705(f)(2) pertaining to Care of Persons with Dementia has been cleared. Licensee secured noted items. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. Licensee has been advised to maintain all items in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 12, 2022
Jun 16, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Alisa Ortiz, and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman, conducted an informal office meeting via teams application with Licensee Jaya Pichika to discuss general compliance concerns at the facility. The following items were discussed during the meeting: Staffing levels and schedule. Physical plant issues. Lack of communication between licensee and the department. Non-compliance with citations. Licensee agrees as follows: Licensee to communicate with the department on all issues or concerns regarding facility operations. Licensee agrees to contact department for clarification and not make assumptions. Licensee to forward a copy of the LIC 500 to LPA by 06/23/2022. Facility will maintain compliance of Title 22 at all times and failure to maintain compliance may result in the department taking further action. During the visit, Licensee was offered technical support services with the department to assist with compliance. Licensee declines the technical support and states she has made the corrections and is confident there will be no issues moving forward. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report will be emailed to Licensee for signature due to the visit being virtual.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2022
May 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a required/ annual visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Jericho De Castro and explained the reason for the visit. LPA spoke with Administrator Pichika via FaceTime. At 10:40 AM, LPA toured the facility with Caregiver DeCastro. Facility has four residents in care during today's visit with one on hospice care. LPA observed residents relaxing in their rooms or in common areas. Facility appears clean and sanitary. All resident's rooms had the required elements as well as restrooms stocked with soap/ sanitizer. At 10:45 AM, LPA observed the attic door is in need of repair. LPA observed the screening/ sanitizing station in the entrance of the facility. Facility takes resident temperatures daily and documents. Facility has covid precaution postings as well as required department postings. At 10:47 AM, LPA observed unsecured Ajax in the master suite restroom cupboard as well as cupboards missing cupboard pulls on cabinet. At 10:52 AM, LPA observed unsecured Windex in the common restroom. LPA toured the kitchen and observed ample food supply as well as emergency food and water in the garage. At 10:56 AM, LPA observed broken cabinet doors in the kitchen as well as unsecured sharps in an unlocked cupboard (photos). Facility has completed the mitigation plan and the plan has been approved. LPA observed the first aid kit contained all required items and medications are stored secured in a locked cabinet. LPA toured the outside grounds and observed the outside visitation area. Facility has a plan for covid testing residents and staff as needed as well as a plan for isolation. All staff and residents are vaccinated for Covid-19. LPA unable to review resident files as files are not on-site at the facility. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2022
Apr 5, 2022Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 03/21/2022. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Red Santos and explained the reason for the visit. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(a) pertaining to Maintenance and Operation has been cleared. Licensee cleared noted items. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87468.2(a)(2) pertaining to Personal Rights has been cleared. Licensee removed camera in living room. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87405(a) pertaining to Administrator Qualifications has NOT been cleared. Licensee did not provide proof of correction. Licensee has NOT complied with the terms of the POC. CIVIL PENALTY ISSUED. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87468.2(a)(1) pertaining to Personal Rights has NOT been cleared. Licensee did not provide proof of correction. Licensee has NOT complied with the terms of the POC. CIVIL PENALTY ISSUED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 5, 2022
Mar 21, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Administrator did not provide residents with privacy. Administrator not demonstrating good character required of the position. Administrator did not treat resident with dignity. Facility is in disrepair. Facility has pests.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Edward Tapia made an unannounced visit to the facility today to deliver findings. LPAs met with Caregiver Amparo Mancillas and discussed the reason for visit. Administrator Jaya Pichika arrived during the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and witnesses. Regarding the allegations that Administrator did not provide residents with privacy, Administrator not demonstrating good character required of the position, Administrator did not treat resident with dignity, facility is in disrepair and facility has pests, the investigation revealed the following: On October 19, 2021, Resident 1 (R1) was actively passing. Family members were present at the time. Three out of four witnesses interviewed state hearing a verbal altercation between Administrator and R1's family member in R1's room with family member requesting the administrator to leave the room. Witnesses state the altercation was heated and occurred while the resident was passing. Witnesses indicate Administrator is very vocal in disagreements with staff in front of families and residents. Administrator admits a video camera was put CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C DATED 03/21/2022. Substantiated up in the living room without consent from responsible parties but states it was removed after reviewing licensing regulations. Witnesses confirm the video camera was in the living room. During tour of the facility, LPA observed items in disrepair in the facility including broken cupboards, an entrance ramp in disrepair, broken furniture on the patio, and kitchen cupboard missing molding. During the course of the investigation, LPA observed that Administrator has not had a current administrator certificate since 09/30/2019. LPA observed cockroaches in the kitchen cupboards and resident room. Based on observations made and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of .Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Citation previously issued on 11/02/2021 for the allegation of facility in disrepair Citation issued previously on 11/23/2021 facility has pests. Citation previously issued on 11/02/2021 for lack of current administrator certificate. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report provided as well as appeal rights..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022 · control 22-AS-20211025141423

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 28, 2022

In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents.. shall have all of the following personal rights: To have a reasonable level of personal privacy in accommodations... and meetings of resident and family groups. This req not being met.. Based on interviews conducted, Licensee failed to ensure a reasonable level of privacy was provided to residents. Administrator admits to putting a video camera up in the living room without any consent from residents or responsible parties. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee removed the camera prior to complaint investigation.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(d) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 4, 2022

The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7). If the licensee is also the administrator, all requirements for an administrator shall apply. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews conducted, Licensee did not have qualifications for operation of facility. Administrator does not have a current certificate and allowed personal rights violations, pests in the facility, and facility to be in disrepair. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights violation.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee to provide a written statement of understanding administrator qualifications and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2022

Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, Licensee failed to ensure resident is accorded dignity. During R1's passing, Licensee was involved in a verbal altercation with R1's family member while family member was asking for privacy. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit a written, detailed plan on how to handle family discussions privately and with dignity and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

Mar 21, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Edward Tapia conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with complaint visit 22-AS-20211025141423. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Amparo Mancillas and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator/ Licensee Jay Pichika arrived during the visit. During the course of the complaint visit, LPAs observed the following: There are various discarded items such as bed frame, mattress, pulley, broken drawers and AC unit in driveway area. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 4, 2022

The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on observation, Licensee failed to ensure facility is clean, safe, and sanitary. LPAs observed discarded items in the front of the driveway. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee to remove discarded items in front of driveway and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

20212 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 23, 2021Facility evaluation reportPOCDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 11/02/2021. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Dominga Santillian and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Jaya Pichika arrived during the visit. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87211(a)(1)(A) pertaining to Reporting Requirements has been cleared. Administrator provided requested death report. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(a) pertaining to Maintenance and Operation has been cleared. LPA observed Licensee has repaired/ replaced noted items. Licensee has complied with the terms of the POC. Advisory note issued on 11/02/2021 advised the following: Facility does not have the "Let Us No" poster in the facility at correct size. Please post in regulation size, 20" X 26" Facility has not posted the poster in regulation size. During the tour of the facility, LPA observed live and dead cockroaches in the kitchen and in resident room. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468(c)(2)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 7, 2021

Licensees shall prominently post personal rights, nondiscrimination notice, and complaint information in areas accessible to residents...Licensees may use the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) Complaint Poster (PUB 475) ... The poster that is posted shall be 20" x 26" in size and be posted in the main entryway of the facility. This req is not being met as evidenced by: Based on observation, Licensee failed to ensure the "Let Us No" poster is posted in the entrance of the facility in regulation size, 20" X 26." This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee to post the poster in regulation size and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(d)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 30, 2021

The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: The premises shall be maintained in a state of good repair and shall provide a safe and healthful environment. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPA observed live and dead cockroaches in the kitchen and resident bedroom. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee to repaire broken cupboards and exterminate cockroaches. Licensee to forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

Nov 23, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on incident report submitted to Community Care Licensing on 11/17/2021. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Dominga Santillian and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator/ Licensee Jay Pichika arrived during the visit. Incident report dated 11/17/2021 indicated Resident 1 (R1) was taken to the urgent care due to possible UTI and Depakote overdose. Administrator stepped out of urgent care for a zoom meeting. Urgent care determined R1 needed to be seen at the emergency room and was unsuccessful in reaching the administrator. Per witnesses, urgent care reached out to facility staff as well as responsible party to advise of the situation. Administrator states being unable to answer phone due to the administrator's zoom call. Administrator made contact after the zoom call and R1 was sent to the emergency room. R1 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection. R1's levels of Depakote were deemed to be acceptable and facility continues to follow the medication orders on file as responsible party is in contact with physician to change the order to a lower dose. Witnesses interviewed indicate R1 is currently incontinent and incontinence care is not being provided at night. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 24, 2021

Basic services shall at a minimum include: Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, Licensee failed to ensure R1 was provided care and supervision. Licensee was unable to receive urgent care's calls due to an appointment Administrator was on. R1 was being transferred to the emergency room. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit a statement indicating understanding of care and supervision and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 7, 2021

Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, Licensee failed to ensure incontinence care is being provided as needed. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit a written plan indicating how incontinence care will be provided and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

Nov 2, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a required/ annual visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Dominga Santillian and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator/ Licensee Jay Pichika arrived during the visit. At 10:00 AM, LPA toured the facility with Caregiver Santillian. Administrator Pichika joined the tour in progress. Facility has three residents in care during today's visit. LPA observed residents relaxing in their rooms or in common areas. Facility appears clean and sanitary. All resident's rooms had the required elements as well as restrooms stocked with soap/ sanitizer. At 10:10 AM, LPA observed a floor tile coming up in the master suite. Hand washing signs are posted throughout the restrooms. LPA observed the screening/ sanitizing station in the entrance of the facility. Facility takes resident temperatures daily and documents. Facility has covid precaution postings as well as most required department postings. Administrator Pichika has an administrator certificate that expired on 09/13/2019. LPA observed a bed and discarded items sitting on the driveway as well as an ramp needing repair (photos). LPA toured the kitchen and observed ample food supply as well as emergency food and water. At 10:20 AM, LPA observed a broken cabinet door in the kitchen as well as missing molding on the top of kitchen cupboards. Facility has completed the mitigation plan and the plan has been approved. LPA observed the first aid kit contained all required items and medications are stored secured in a locked cabinet. LPA toured the outside grounds and observed the outside visitation area. LPA observed a patio set with broken cushions and table decorations are peeling off the table. Facility has ample supply of PPE and cleaning supplies. Facility has a plan for covid testing residents and staff as needed as well as a plan for isolation. All staff and residents are vaccinated for Covid-19. LPA reviewed all files which contained required documentation including emergency information and updated physician reports. LPA consulted with Administrator regarding the importance of maintaining an ample supply of N95 masks on-site at all times. Based on the observations made during today's visit, CONTINUED ON LIC 809C DATED 11/02/2021 the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2021
Nov 2, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with complaint visit 22-AS-20211025141423. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Dominga Santillian and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator/ Licensee Jay Pichika arrived during the visit. During the course of the complaint investigation, LPA requested the file and death report for Resident 1 (R1). Facility does not have the file for resident nor had submitted the death report. LPA consulted with Administrator regarding the importance of reporting incidents and death reports timely. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(b) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 2, 2021

The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, Licensee failed to ensure R1's file is maintained at the facility. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee to provide proof of R1's file to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 9, 2021

Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as.., including.., the following: Death of any resident from any cause regardless of where the death occurred... This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interview conducted, Licensee failed to ensure a death report for R1 was submitted to Licensing. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee to forward death report to LPA by POC due date.

5 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 29, 2022 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Pichika, Jayalakshmi, licensed since 2008.

Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Talega Terrace · San Clemente
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2008, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
24
Total complaints
2
Substantiated allegations
8
Type A citations
2
Type B citations
4

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2008, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations20
Type B citations40
Substantiated allegations80
Total complaints20

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Rosehaven 1

Is Rosehaven 1 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

How many residents is Rosehaven 1 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

Has Rosehaven 1 been cited?

2 Type A and 4 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. Those records count 24 state visits over the same years.

Is Rosehaven 1 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.

What does Rosehaven 1 cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 194 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 194 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Rosehaven 1 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Pichika, Jayalakshmi, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

Can Rosehaven 1 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

Rosehaven 1 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROSEHAVEN 1”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306003893. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • Licensed to Pichika, Jayalakshmi, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • 24 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 4 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. The same records count 24 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 8 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Orange County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    San Clemente · 0.7 mi

    The Seville of San Clemente

    Large community · licensed for 130

    Starting rate

    $7,550 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Clemente · 0.2 mi

    Mimi's Guest Home

    Small home · licensed for 5

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Clemente · 1.1 mi

    Accent on Seniors

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Clemente · 0.1 mi

    Rosehaven III Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Clemente · 1.7 mi

    Atlas Living Calle Grande Vista

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,450–$6,700

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Clemente · 1.9 mi

    Casa Francesca

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Orange County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
R1

Call Rosehaven 1

San Clemente · Licensed for 6

(949) 366-2599

From the state licensing record · October 25, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Rosehaven 1

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages