Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Pech5 Mg Oc

Mid-size home·Licensed for 45·Menlo Park, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #415601180
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$6,350 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $5,000–$8,350
  • Home sizeLicensed for 45Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit28 of 45 beds occupiedDecember 18, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 8, 2026CDSS inspection record

Pech5 Mg Oc is a mid-size care home in Menlo Park — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 45 residents since 2024.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Pech5 Mg Oc

Is Pech5 Mg Oc licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Pech5 Mg Oc licensed for?

45 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Pech5 Mg Oc been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 5 state visits over the same years.

Is Pech5 Mg Oc still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Pech5 Mg Oc cost?

$6,350 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $5,000–$8,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 55 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Mateo County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,750 to $7,000 a month, and the middle figure is $6,500 (n = 55 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Pech5 Mg Oc take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Pech5 Mg Oc LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital Stanford is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Pech5 Mg Oc keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Pech5 Mg Oc license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PECH5 MG OC LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #415601180. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 45 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Pech5 Mg Oc LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 5 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 5 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 45 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 10 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 45 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR (20).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$6,350a month to start

Likely $5,000–$8,350

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$6,350a month

Likely $5,000–$8,450

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$6,350likely $5,000–$8,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$8,450
$6,350
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,900–$11,250
$8,350
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $6,500–$7,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 800 Roble Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits since 2024. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 8, 2026.

On file since
2024
State visits
5
Most recent visit
July 8, 2026
Occupied · December 18, 2024 visit
28 of 45 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated December 18, 2024. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints1typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202612020251102024220

The last 36 months — 5 of 5 documents

20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jul 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On July 8, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on a 30-day eviction letter that the facility issued to resident #1 (R1). LPA met with Administrator Designee Jizeel Clement and Quality Assurance, Jennifer Tobias. On July 6, 2026, Ms. Tobias provided a copy of R1's 30-day eviction notice to LPA that was provided to R1's responsible party. After reviewing the 30-day notice, LPA informed Ms. Tobias that the 30-day notice was not in compliance with Title 22 under Eviction Procedures and it needed to be retracted, revised and reissued. During today's visit, LPA met with Ms. Tobias, and reviewed the Title 22 Regulation for Eviction Procedures. Ms. Tobias stated that the facility will retract the 30-day eviction notice and will reissue it to the responsible party. No deficiency is cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator Designee, Quality Assurance and Resident Care Coordinator. A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026
Jul 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On July 8, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted a unannounced case management visit to follow-up on an incident that was reported by the facility. LPA was greeted by the receptionist and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. The administrator was informed of LPA's visit over the phone by the med tech, Karis Caballero. LPA received a tour from the med tech of the facility and at the end of the tour, the administrator designee, Jizzel Clement took over and assisted with the rest of the visit. On June 17, 2026, the facility reported an incident that happened on June 16, 2026 concerning to resident #1 (R1) who was sitting in the patio around 3:15PM and at 3:30PM, staff noticed that R1 was missing. The incident report stated that staff checked R1's room but R1 was not there so they searched the entire facility and R1 was no where to be found. Subsequently, they called the local law enforcement and reported R1 being missing and at the same time, the local law enforcement informed them that they found R1 they were returning R1 back to the facility. The incident report also stated that a quick assessment of R1 was conducted and revealed R1 was at his/her baseline. During today's visit, LPA observed R1 in the activity room to be calm, and pleasant. LPA interviewed the administrator designee who stated that at the time of the incident, the front gate was being repaired by an outside contractor and the contractor left it open resulting in R1 exiting the facility. The administrator designee stated that after the incident, the facility provided re-training to staff on elopement, R1's service needs and plan was updated and the administrator met with the outside repair company and reinforced resident safety expectations. No deficiency is cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with Quality Assurance, Administrator Designee and Resident Care Coordinator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On August 13, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with Quality Assurance, Jennifer Tobias and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. This is a single story memory care facility. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to a random sample of resident rooms, common areas, communal bathrooms, and kitchen area. LPA observed residents eating lunch and participating in activities. A comfortable temperature is maintained in the facility and lighting is sufficient for comfort. Hot water temperature measured between 106-111 degrees F throughout the facility. Overall facility was in clean, odor-free and free from any tripping hazards. Resident rooms and bathrooms observed had all required furnishings, and grab bars in each bathroom. LPA toured kitchen and observed 2 days for perishables and and 7 days non-perishable. Medications, sharps and chemicals were locked and inaccessible to residents. Emergency drill are being conducted and logged every 3 months. Carbon monoxide monitors are working properly. All fire extinguishers have been checked and current as of December 2024. First aid kits were observed present and complete. Five resident records and five staff records were reviewed. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with the Jennifer Tobias and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have adequate medical equipment.

On December 18, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator, Neeru Verma and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, facility does not have adequate medical equipment, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) is diabetic and the facility runs out of equipment, in specific test strips. According to the reporting party, the med-tech indicated that the test strips is on it's way, however reporting party indicated that they are unsure when the test strips will arrive. During the visit, LPA interviewed Administrator, Med-techs, and observed R1's medications. According to the Administrator, R1's responsible party orders test-strips for R1 because R1's responsible party ordered a new machine for R1 and there are specific test strips that can be used. During the visit, LPA observed a full bottle of R1's test strips. According to the Administrator and Med-techs, prior to R1's new machine, the facility used to call the pharmacy for refills once a month for 30-day supply. In addtion, now with the new machine, med-techs will notify administrator when test-strips are low and administrator will contact R1's responsible party. Based on interviews & observations, the department has determined that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2024 · control 14-AS-20241210100533
Sep 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 9/13/2024 LPAs Grace Donato & Kiran Jain made an unannounced pre-licensing visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator Neeru Verma. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including random resident rooms, common areas & kitchen. The passageways were free of obstruction. Residents currently engaged in the activity room. The residents have adequate amount of linens and all personal belongings are intact. While touring the facility it was observed that the room temperature was at 69 deg F. Hot water was also tested in the bathrooms and the temperature was 108 deg F. Carbon monoxide monitor is working properly. All fire extinguishers are in place and current. Facility has sprinkler system. Client bathrooms were observed to be in good repair equipped with grab bars and non-skid floors. LPA checked the food supply and there is adequate amount of food, 2 days for perishables and & 7 days non-perishable. Medication is updated and logged. Three client records and three staff records were reviewed. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs. Facility is clean and in good repair based on observations made today. Facility is in compliance with Title 22 regulations. No citations are issued. Component III is conducted on this day. No deficiencies are cited at this time. Report is reviewed and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Mateo County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Mateo County