Mid-size home · Licensed for 15 · El Cajon
Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home
660 Van Houten Ave, El Cajon, CA 92020Licensed since 2014
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 15: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES 15 RESIDENTS; AGE 60 AND ABOVE. 6 OF WHOM MAY BE NON- AMBULATORY; HOSPICE CARE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 3 RESIDENTS.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$3,500a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,500likely a month
Starting monthly rate$3,500this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$4,100
- $3,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,500–$7,650
- $6,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,000
9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,500–$7,000.
- Lexington HouseEl Cajon · 0.3 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Noble Living IIEl Cajon · 1.3 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Senior Care & Comfort LivingEl Cajon · 2.0 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sierra Sunshine CareEl Cajon · 2.1 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Renaissance LivingLa Mesa · 2.1 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Pine Tree Home 2El Cajon · 2.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Meadow Creek VillaEl Cajon · 2.2 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Jobeth Home CareEl Cajon · 2.3 mi · Small home$4,650Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Peppertree Guest Home IILa Mesa · 2.7 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (2)Shared / companion rooms · Room types
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Room typesPrivate · Shared
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (1)Residents may bring a pet
Residents may bring a petReported no
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Where it is
660 Van Houten Ave, El Cajon, CA 92020Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Grossmont HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.4 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #374603513 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 13 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall conducted an unannounced annual required visit to the above-mentioned facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with the House Manager. The facility operates as a Residential Care facility for the Elderly with Dementia. A facility tour was conducted, which included indoor activity areas, restrooms, kitchens, and outdoor space. All areas were clean, safe, and in good repair. Furniture and equipment were in good condition and appropriate for the clients in care. The facility has sufficient space and seating for all clients, with no exit obstructions. The restrooms were equipped with adequate supplies. The hot water temperature was measured within the required range of 105°F to 120°F. Staff prepared meals, and menus were available at the time of the visit. A random sample of client files was reviewed. Files contained current physicians’ reports, admission agreements, emergency information, needs and services plans, and other required documentation. Staff records reviewed contained criminal record clearance, health screening, current first aid/CPR certification, and required training. Continued on 809 C LPA conducted interviews with 3 staff member, 4 residents, and 1 on hospice. No concerns were noted. The facility’s emergency disaster plan was observed to be current and posted. Fire drills are conducted as required, and documentation is available for review. Fire extinguishers were serviced within the past year, and smoke/carbon monoxide detectors were operable. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with the House Manager, and a copy of this report, along with the Licensee Rights (LIC 9058), was provided to the House Manager. His signature on this form confirms receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall, conducted an unannounced Required 1 year Annual Visit. LPA was allowed entry by Carminda Ramirez, Licensee. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit with the Licensee. Physical Environment: The facility was clean, maintained, and free from any safety hazards. Adequate lighting and ventilation were observed in all areas of the facility. All necessary safety equipment, such as fire extinguishers and emergency exits, were present and in good working condition. The facility's outdoor spaces were properly maintained and accessible to residents. Staffing and Training: The facility had a sufficient number of qualified staff members to meet the needs of the residents. The staff member was observed to be professional, courteous, and knowledgeable in their respective roles. All staff members had completed the required training and certifications per the licensing regulations. Staffing schedules were posted and adhered to, ensuring adequate coverage. Continued on 809C Resident Care and Services: Residents' care plans were reviewed and found to be comprehensive and up-to-date. Medication administration was observed to be in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures. Residents' nutritional needs were met, and the meals provided were nutritious and well-balanced. Recreational activities and social engagement opportunities were available to residents regularly. Health and Safety: Regular health assessments and monitoring of residents' well-being were conducted by qualified healthcare professionals. Infection control measures were in place and followed by staff members. The facility had established protocols for emergencies and evacuation plans were readily available. Overall, the facility was found to comply with the licensing regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and the Licensee Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to the Licensee. Her signature on this form confirms receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2024
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Questionable deaths Staff mismanaged residents' medications Staff failed to meet the residents' needs Staff unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier. Untrained staff
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations LPA was allowed entry by Art Vinarao,Caregiver. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the findings with the Caregiver. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, outside sources, a review of records, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that neglect by facility staff resulted in the questionable deaths of Residents #1-2 (R1-R2). A review of records revealed R1 was non-ambulatory and required assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing, feeding, and incontinence care. R1 was confused/disoriented but was able to communicate their needs. R1 began receiving hospice services from a hospice agency on September 1, 2020. Interviews with staff indicated staff checked on R1 approximately every two hours and assisted R1 with repositioning and incontinence care. R1 was prescribed oxygen and morphine to aid in comfort care. {Continued on 9099C} Unsubstantiated The investigation confirmed that the individual in question was not listed in the facility's clearance records. They did not possess the required background checks or clearance as an employee. The staff interviewed corroborated that the individual had been present in the facility without the proper clearance. The allegation that an uncleared adult was an employee within the facility is substantiated as there is a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. The individual was hired as a caregiver without the necessary background checks and approvals, which is a violation of Health and Safety Code section 1569.17 (e )(1). An exit interview was conducted; a copy of this report along with Licensee Appeal Rights LIC 9058 (REV 3/22) were provided to Art Vinarao, Caregiver and his signature confirms receipt of these documents. On October 26, 2020, hospice staff documented wounds, of unknown staging, to R1’s forearm and coccyx. On November 25, 2020, hospice staff documented R1 was noted to have developed a stage 3 pressure injury. Interviews with outside medical professionals who visited the facility and observed R1 did not have concerns regarding neglect or unmet needs for R1. Additionally, there were no concerns regarding assistance with medication administration or mismanagement of R1’s medication. R1 passed away at the facility on November 26, 2020. According to the County of San Diego Certificate of Death, R1’s cause of death was listed as Cardiac Arrest and Respiratory Arrest with Hepatic failure, unspecified without coma, and Non-Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver noted as the underlying causes of death. A review of records revealed R2 was non-ambulatory and required assistance with bathing, dressing, feeding, transferring, and incontinence care. R2 was able to communicate their needs. R2 began receiving hospice services from a hospice agency before their admission to the facility. Interviews with staff indicated staff checked on R2 approximately every two hours to assist with repositioning and assisted R2 with incontinence care. R2 was prescribed oxygen due to their medical condition. Interviews with medical professionals revealed R2 was oriented and able to operate their oxygen machine. Interviews with outside sources and outside medical professionals who visited the facility and observed R2 did not have concerns regarding neglect or unmet needs for R2. Additionally, there were no concerns regarding assistance with medication administration or mismanagement of R2’s medication. R2 passed away at the facility on October 3, 2020. R2’s cause of death was listed as Interstitial Lung Disease. Outside source and residents interviewed regarding the language barrier, there are no concerns, and staff could communicate with residents in their preferred language. Based on the investigation findings, the allegations made against the staff regarding all allegations of Questionable Deaths, Staff Mismanagement of Residents' Medications, Staff Failure to Meet Residents' Needs, Untrained staff, and Staff Unable to Communicate with Residents Due to a Language Barrier—are unsubstantiated. A finding that is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Art Vinarao, Caregiver. A copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to the Caregiver and his signature on this report confirms receipt of the Licensee Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201202155827
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.17(b)(1). · Plan of correction due date: Aug 23, 2024
(b)All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant ....... shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, records, and systems review, the licensee did not ensure Staff #1 had a CA criminal record clearance prior toworking or volunteering in the licensed facility which posed an immediate Health, Safety and Personal Rights Risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024
Plan of correction: Immediate Action: Ensure that the uncleared individual do not have access to the facility until proper clearance is obtained. POC cleared on 12/14/2020
Feb 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall conducted an unannounced visit to open a complaint and deliver findings. LPA was allowed entry by Art Vinarao, Caregiver. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the findings to the Manager. On February 20, 2024, a complaint was received regarding Staff mismanaged residents' medication. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the validity of the allegation and take appropriate actions if necessary. The following were reviewed and observed as part of the investigation: Residents' records, Medication Administration Records (MAR), and a facility tour on February 29, 2024. {Continued on 9099C} Substantiated Allegation: Staff mismanaged residents' medication. The investigation found that staff members did not follow prescribed medication administration per the prescription order. LPA interviewed staff, outside sources, and the resident all stated that the dosage had been given as prescribed it was only at bedtime according to the medical records in December 2023. The increase took place on January 23, 2024. However, it was noticed by the outside source that the medication was given at the prior dosage on February 2, 2024, during a visit with the resident. The staff, outside sources, and resident all stated that the medication had been given at the correct dosage as of February 20, 2024. Based on the evidence obtained during the complaint investigation, the allegation was found to be SUBSTANTIATED, as there is a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Art Vinarao, Caregiver. A copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to the Caregiver and his signature on this report confirms receipt of the Licensee Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240220090113
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 80075(b) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 29, 2024
80075(b)Clients shall be assisted as needed with….medications. (5) If the client's physician has stated in writing that the client is unable to determine his/her own….the licensee shall be permitted to assist the client... (B) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according….This requirement was not met: Based upon interviews and records reviewed. This deficiency may pose a potiential Health and Safety risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 29, 2024
Plan of correction: The correction had been made based on records reviewed, outside sources, resident statements. The PRN did not have any side affects per the SW and no immediate health risk. date corrected 02/20/2024
Feb 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall conducted an unannounced visit to open a complaint and deliver findings. LPA was allowed entry by Art Vinarao, Caregiver. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the findings to the Caregiver. On February 2, 2024, a complaint was received regarding Staff mismanaged residents' medication. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the validity of the allegation and take appropriate actions if necessary. The following were reviewed and observed as part of the investigation: Residents' records, Medication Administration Records (MAR), and a tour of the facility. Continued on 9099 C Substantiated Allegation: Staff mismanaged residents' medication. The investigation found that staff members did not follow prescribed medication administration per the prescription order. Interviewed staff, outside sources, and the resident all stated that additional dosages were given to the resident because the resident requested more due to anxiety. The staff, outside sources, and resident all stated that the medication had been given at the correct dosage as of February 2, 2024. An exit interview was conducted with Art Vinarao, Caregiver. A copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to the Caregiver and his signature on this report confirms receipt of the Licensee Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240202103131
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 80075(5)(b) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 7, 2024
80075(b)Clients shall be assisted as needed with….medications. (5) If the client's physician has stated in writing that the client is unable to determine his/her own….the licensee shall be permitted to assist the client... (B) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according….This requirement was not met: Based upon interviews and records reviewed. This deficiency may pose a potiential Health and Safety risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024
Plan of correction: The correction had been made based on records reviewed, outside sources, resident statements. The PRN did not have any side affects per the SW and no immediate health risk. Corrected on February 2, 2024
Feb 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulting in hospitalization Staff did not meet resident's needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the allegations mentioned above LPA was allowed entry by Art Vinarao, Caregiver. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the findings to the Caregiver. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, interviews with staff and outside sources, and a records review. On November 30, 2023, the Department received a complaint alleging that Staff neglect resulted in hospitalization and Staff not meeting the resident's needs. The records reviewed indicated that the resident was referred to the facility by the hospital for comfort and care on November 27, 2023. No admission agreement was signed by the Power of Attorney (POA) for the resident nor was a Hospice agreement signed. Continued on 9099 C Unsubstantiated The Administrator, Carminida Ramirez stated that she had spoken to the POA several times to come and sign the admission agreement with no response. Hospice also stated that on the date the resident was taken to the hospital, the POA denied assistance. Based on the investigation findings, it can be concluded that the allegations of staff neglect resulting in hospitalization and staff not meeting the resident's needs are unsubstantiated. A finding that is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with the Licensee Rights (LIC 9058) was provided to Art Vinarao, Caregiver. His signature on this form confirms receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 08-AS-20231130163001
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Rodgers, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection to ensure substantial compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Rodgers was granted entry into the facility by Administrator Carminda Ramirez, after identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection. Facility serves elderly residents ages 60 and above; approved for fifteen (15) residents of which six (6) can be non-Ambulatory. Hospice waiver for 3. The facility does not feature a secured perimeter. LPA was accompanied by Administrator Ramirez during a tour of the facility. A tour of the facility was conducted which included a sample of resident units, the dining area, recreation rooms, and food storage areas. Signal systems are in place and operational. PPE supplies are onsite. Passageways were free from obstructions. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings. Lighting was present in the bedrooms. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars and Non-skid mats. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were in working order. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA observed an activities calendar; however, licensee explained most clients prefer to not participate. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] Facility has a two-day supply of perishable food and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Refrigerator and Freezer temperature were compliant. Food was observed to be properly stored and labeled. The food service area was observed to be neat and clean. Food menus were posted. Chemicals and cleaning supplies were stored in a locked closed cabinet under sink not assessable to residents. Centrally stored medications were properly stored and locked in medication cart. Medication logs and medications reviewed were current and medications appear to be administered according to the label instructions. Resident records were reviewed and confirmed compliant. LPA reviewed the theft and loss policy and procedures. Transportation procedures are compliant. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet resident’s needs. There was a technical violation observed and two technical advisories were given during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Ramirez, to whom copies of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. Their signature on this form acknowledges receipt and a copy of the report was given to Administrator Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Dec 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in sexual abuse.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation LPA was allowed entry by, Carla Hayag, Caregiver. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the findings with the Caregiver. It was alleged that lack of staff supervision resulted in the sexual abuse (inappropriate touching) of a resident at the facility on 7/11/23 by an unknown individual. Evidence obtained during interviews confirmed that residents at this facility could come and go from the facility unsupervised. There are staff that reside at the facility, but due to the residents’ independent status, staff are not required to do room checks. Administrator Carminda Ramirez said Resident 1 (R1, LIC 811 provided for name of resident) would often leave their door open at night to allow their pet to freely come and go from their room. Unsubstantiated Carminda stated she had admonished R1 to close and lock their door during the evening hours for safety. R1 admitted that Carminda had advised them on several occasions to close and lock their door during the evening. An interview was conducted with R1, Resident 2 (R2) and Resident 3 (R3), who all had brief interactions with the unknown male on the evening of 7/11/2023. All three residents witnessed the Suspected Abuser (SA) asking for the location of the manager’s office and about the possibility of a vacant room. R1 described the SA as “grazing” their left breast with his hand when his hand slipped from R1’s shoulder and was unable to say if the SA did it intentionally or not. R3 was in the room with R1 when the SA was at the front door. R3 stated they did not hear any conversation between R1 and the SA, and R3 did not see the SA touch R1. R2 described the SA as “cordial.” R2 said the SA escorted them down the stairs by holding their elbow with his hand, but did not act inappropriately. In this case, the SA involved in this incident was unknown and the witnesses/residents were only able to provide a vague description of the SA. Based on R1’s statement, it is unknown if the SA touched R1's breast intentionally or accidently. Local law enforcement sources indicated that even if the SA were to be identified, it would still be difficult to prove the SA touched R1 for sexual gratification. In addition, there is no requirement to check on the residents at night and R1 admitted that Administrator had admonished them many times to close and lock their door at night. Based on the investigation, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation that lack of supervision resulted in sexual abuse, therefore it has been unsubstantiated. No further investigation is warranted. A finding that is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Carla Hayag, Caregiver copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to the Caregiver and her signature on this report confirms receipt of the Licensee Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230713130511
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an unannounced visit to conduct an investigation into the above listed complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and was granted entry into the facility by Arthuro Vinarao, Staff. The administrator, Carminda Ramirez, was contacted via telephone, and LPA disclosed the reason for the visit to the administrator. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above listed allegation. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, review of records, and interview of facility staff. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) [Administrator was provided an LIC 811 Confidential Names List that identifies the resident] was issued eviction notices for smoking while oxygen was in use, refusing care from facility staff, and being noncompliant. It was reported that R1 was initially given a notice with 3 days to move out of the facility, and, a week later, R1 was given a notice with 30 days to move. Substantiated Records reviewed and interview conducted revealed that R1 was issued a 3-day notice on May 25, 2023, as an incentive to see his/her doctor, and was issued a 60-day notice to vacate on June 1, 2023. Once R1 agreed to visit the doctor and scheduled an appointment, the 3-day notice was rescinded by the facility’s licensee on July 27, 2023. Community Care Licensing did not approve issuance of a 3-day notice to quit to R1. Based upon the foregoing, the above allegation is substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation is valid. Deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and noted on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with Carminda Ramirez, via telephone, and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to Hailee Bazua, House Manager, at the conclusion of the visit. Her signature on this report confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230727102050
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(b) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 22, 2023
Eviction Procedures. The licensee may, upon obtaining prior written approval from the licensing agency, evict the resident upon three (3) days written notice to quit. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not obtain written approval from Community Care Licensing prior ot issuing a 3-day notice to quit to R1, 1 of 8 residents in care. This posed a potential personal rights violation to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to ensure that licensee and administrator receive outside vendor training on proper eviction procedures in accordance with Title 22 regulations. Administrator agreed to provide proof of training to Community Care Licensing by the POC due date.
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 6, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted a case management visit to cite for a deficiency that was observed during a complaint investigation. LPA was granted entry into the facility by Arthuro Vinarao, Staff, to whom she disclosed the purpose of the visit. The house manager, Althea Bordario, was called and arrived a short time later. During a complaint investigation, LPA discovered, through interviews and record review, that Resident 1 (R1) [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to identify the resident] moved into the facility on March 13, 2022; however, an admission agreement was not executed until March 30, 2022. Deficiency is being cited Per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 of the California Code of Regulations and is listed on an LIC 809-D. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed with Althea Bordario. A copy of the report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to the house manager, and her signature on this form acknowledges receipt of the rights and a copy of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87456(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 13, 2022
Evaluation of Suitability for Admission. (a) Prior to accepting a resident for care and in order to evaluate his/her suitability, the facility shall, as specified in this article 8: (4) Execute the admissions agreement. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and review of records, licensee did not execute an admission agreement prior to admission for 1 (R1) of 13 residents. This posed a potential personal rights violation for resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2022
Plan of correction: Admission Agreement for R1 was executed on March 30, 2022. The deficiency has been corrected and is being cleared during today's visit.
May 26, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident was illegally evicted.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings from the investigation conducted into the above listed complaint allegation. LPA was granted entry into the facility by Arthuro Vinarao, Staff, to whom she disclosed the reason for the visit. The administrator, Carminda Ramirez, was contacted by phone, informed of the reason for the visit, and arrived a short time later. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above listed allegation. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, review of records, and interviews of administrator, Resident 1 (R1) [Administrator was provided an LIC 811 Confidential Names List that identifies the resident], and outside sources. It was alleged that R1 was transported to a local hospital a few days after moving into the facility, and the facility refused to accept the resident back into the facility due to non-payment of facility fees. Unsubstantiated Based upon information obtained during the course of the investigation, R1 was accepted and moved from a local hospital into the facility on 3/13/2022. On several dates thereafter, R1 called and requested emergency ambulance service to be transported to the hospital due to extreme chronic pain. According to information obtained, R1 was transported to the hospital on 3/18/2022, and on or about 3/20/2022, hospital personnel notified Staff 1 (S1) that R1 was ready to be discharged back to the facility. S1 informed hospital personnel that R1 did not want to be at the facility and requested the assistance of hospital staff with getting R1 to understand that residing in the facility required execution of an admission agreement and payment of a monthly fee, both of which R1 was not willing to do. Interviews conducted during the investigation yielded that R1 expressly did not want to reside in the facility because it was not a medical facility, and the facility staff were not able to provide medical attention, which is what R1 was seeking and desired to have. Further, prior to moving into the facility, R1 was not aware that the facility staff were not able to, nor would the staff be providing onsite medical care. Between 3/20/2022 and 3/23/2022, R1 continued to remain in the hospital while S1 made attempts to come to an agreement with R1. During that time, an outside source assisted with efforts to get R1 to agree to return and to agree to the terms associated with residing in the facility. R1 returned to the facility on or about 3/23/2022, agreed to sign an admission agreement on 3/30/2022, and remained in the facility until the time of death in May of 2022. Although R1 remained in the hospital three days after the hospital notified facility staff that R1 was ready for discharge, the investigation did not reveal information to conclude that S1 or any other staff of the facility refused R1’s return to the facility. Based upon the foregoing the allegation is unsubstantiated. This finding means that although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Carminda Ramirez, Administrator and a copy of this report and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to the administrator at the conclusion of the visit. Her signature on this form acknowledges receipt of the rights and a copy of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220322163331
20212 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 16, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lizzette Tellez visited the facility to conduct an annual required licensing inspection. LPA met with House Manager, Art VInarao, and discussed the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility, and verified compliance with infection control practices. LPA and Mr. Vinarao reviewed the facility’s Plan for Epidemic Outbreak Specific to COVID-19 Mitigation Plan Report. LPA observed one central entry point for universal entry screening; routine symptom screening initiated at entry for staff, residents and visitors; a sign-in policy enacted for all visitors; signs posted at facility entrance with the facility’s visitor policy and signs throughout the facility to promote hand hygiene, cough/sneeze etiquette and physical distancing; face coverings worn by staff; hand sanitizer/hand washing stations readily available; a designated visitation area; emergency agencies’ contact information posted in a location visible to staff and residents; and an adequate supply of cleaning products. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with Mr. Vinarao. A copy of this report, along with the Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 FAS 01/16), were provided to the Administrator via email. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent by the Administrator upon receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021
Aug 17, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alexandre Vo, conducted an unannounced Case Management inspection regarding an Absence Without Leave (AWOL) incident received at the San Diego Office on August 16, 2021. LPA was allowed entry into the facility byCaregiver, Arthuro Vinarao, after identifying himself. LPA met with House Manager, Casey Hernandez, and explained the purpose of the inspection. During today’s inspection, LPA briefly toured the facility, collected records, and interviewed staff and residents. It was reported that Resident #1 (R1, see List of Confidential Names) left the facility for a doctor’s appointment on August 12, 2021 and has not returned to the facility. At this time, this incident requires further review and additional information is needed. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with the House Manager. A copy of this report and Licensee’s Rights (9058 01/16) were provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2021
9 of 15 beds were occupied at the September 26, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Mangano, Gary A, licensed since 2014.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2014, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 13
- Total complaints
- 7
- Substantiated allegations
- 4
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2014, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 4 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 7 | 1 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home
Is Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home licensed for?
15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home been cited?
1 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home cost?
$3,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 12 other homes of a similar licensed size in El Cajon that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,250 to $6,600 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 12 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Mangano, Gary A, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Grossmont Hospital is 2.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Parkway Gardens Retirement Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PARKWAY GARDENS RETIREMENT CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374603513. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Mangano, Gary A, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 7 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$7,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,400–$6,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,400–$6,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,700–$7,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $2,700–$4,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County