Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Senior Care & Comfort Living

Small home·Licensed for 6·El Cajon, California

Licensed since 2011Licence #374603156
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · DementiaState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$3,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedNovember 20, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 19, 2026CDSS inspection record

Senior Care & Comfort Living is a small care home in El Cajon — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2011. Hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Senior Care & Comfort Living

Is Senior Care & Comfort Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Senior Care & Comfort Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Senior Care & Comfort Living been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Senior Care & Comfort Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Senior Care & Comfort Living cost?

$3,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 12 other homes of a similar licensed size in El Cajon that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,250 to $6,600 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 12 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Senior Care & Comfort Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Logalla, Brandon, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Grossmont Hospital is 4.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Senior Care & Comfort Living keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Senior Care & Comfort Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SENIOR CARE & COMFORT LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374603156. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Logalla, Brandon, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 6 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGE 60 AND ABOVE.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$3,000a month

Likely $3,000–$3,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,000–$3,600
$3,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,000–$7,100
$5,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,850–$7,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1019 Greenfield Drive, El Cajon, CA 92021Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 14 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2011. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 19, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
14
Most recent visit
August 19, 2026
Occupied · November 20, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 30, 2022 to November 20, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (6). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints6typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2011.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020253302024340202311020222302021110

The last 36 months — 10 of 14 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a Plan of Correction (POC) visit to confirm that citation(s) which were issued on March 03, 2026 have been corrected. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Brandon Logalla. The following citations were reviewed during today's visit: On March 3, 2026, the Licensee provided the required LIC 200 application & facility sketch via email to the CCLD office for the following citation: 87202(a)(2) Fire Clearance. The Licensee also provided a Hospice Care Plan, Hospice Waiver Request and updated medical assessments via email for the following citations issued on March 3, 2026 for: 87632(a) Hospice Care Waiver and 87458(a) Medical Assessment. These citations are cleared and the Plan of Correction (POC) were met. During the visit, LPA conducted a health & safety check and interviewed all residents. No new deficiencies were identified or cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Brandon, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2026
Mar 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Boyles conducted an unannounced visit to the facility, to issue deficiencies identified during a review of facility records. LPA identified herself to Licensee/Administrator Brandon Logalla, was granted entry, and explained the purpose of the visit. A review of resident records revealed that Resident #1 (R1), Resident #2 (R2), and Resident #4 (R4) are currently receiving hospice care services. [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for a description of select person identifiers used in this report.] Interview with Licensee/Administrator reported they admitted R1, R2, and R4 to the facility knowing they were going to be receiving hospice care services. However, the facility does not have an approved hospice waiver on record with the Department. Additional resident records reviewed by LPA revealed that R1, R2, and Resident #3 (R3) had incomplete Medical Assessments on file. LPA conducted a brief facility tour through the facility and observed R1 and R2 to be bedridden. LPA interviewed staff who reported providing repositioning assistance to R1 and R2 several times throughout the day. LPA also reviewed hospice records for R1 and R2 which noted these residents to be bed bound. The facility is not licensed to accept any bedridden residents per the fire clearance. Three (3) deficiencies were observed and cited today per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D pages), including an immediate civil penalty of $500 being assessed (refer to the LIC421IM page). A Plan of Correction for each deficiency was jointly developed with Licensee/Administrator. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee/Administrator Brandon Logalla to whom a copy of this report, a copy of the LIC 811 Confidential names list, LIC 421IM, and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 4, 2026

87202 Fire Clearance (a)All facilities...Prior to accepting or retaining any of the following types of persons, the...licensee shall notify the licensing agency and obtain an appropriate fire clearance...(2)Bedridden persons This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA observations, records reviewed, and staff interviews revelaed that R1 and R2 are bedbound. The Licensee does not have a fire clearance to accept bedbound residents. This posed an immediate health and saftey risk for 2 of 4 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated they will submit an LIC200 application for bedridden clearance, update the facility sketch, and contact the Fire Marshall. The Licensee will submit proof to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87632(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 13, 2026

87632 Hospice Care Waiver (a) In order accept or retain terminally ill residents and permit them to receive care from a hospice agency, the licensee shall have obtained a facility hospice care waiver from the Department ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Per records review, R1, R2, and R4 were accepted as residents requireing hospcie care services without the Licensee having a Hospice Care Waiver. This posed a health and safety risk to 3 of 4 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated they will submit hospice exceptions for R1, R2, and R3 by POC due date and submit proof to LPA.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 13, 2026

87458 Medical Assessment (a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a licensed medical professional...to be kept in the resident's record. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Records reviewed revealed R1, R2, and R3 had incompleted Medical Assessments (LIC 602A). This posed a poetential health and safety risk to 3 of 4 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee stated they will get updated and completed Physician's Reports for R1, R2, and R3. Licensee will submit proof to LPA by POC due date.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect to resident resulting in pressure injuries Unlawful Eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Becky Kernnedy , conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry. LPA met with Brandon Logalla,Licensee and Administrator. The first allegation is that the facility neglected a resident resulting in pressure injuries. A review of documents and interviews revealed that when Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility they had a pressure injury. Throughout R1’s residency at the facility they were receiving wound care from a home health agency. R1 was also receiving hospice services. No evidence acquired during the investigation supported the allegation that R1’s pressure injury was the result of neglect by the facility. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated The second allegation is that R1 was unlawfully evicted. Interviews revealed that R1 was tested and found to have colonized MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,). The facility staff arranged to have R1 transported to the hospital. The hospital staff wanted to release R1 back to the facility. The facility staff declined because of R1 having a prohibited health condition. R1 was released to a skilled nursing facility directly from the hospital where R1 could receive increased wound care. This care arrangement was more appropriate for R1 at the time. This allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Brandon Logalla, Licensee and Administrator. . A copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (9058 01/16) were left at the facility..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20211027094322
Oct 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Boyles conducted an unannounced Annual Inspection visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Brandon Logalla. LPA, accompanied by Licensee, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Residents bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant. Hot water taps accessible to residents were compliant. There were enough cooking and dining equipment present. There were at least 2 days of perishable food items and at least 7 days of non-perishable food items, all safely stored. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per Licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. (Continued on LIC809-C) (Continued from LIC809) LPA interviewed staff and residents and reviewed staff and resident records/files. LPA’s interviews with residents did not raise any licensing concerns. Staff files reviewed by LPA contained the required documents. One (1) out of five (5) resident's files did not contain the required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee presented proof of active business liability insurance. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, but not stored inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the medication cabinet left open and unattended and medications unattended in a vacant bedroom. Two (2) deficiencies were observed and cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 809-D pages). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Licensee for all deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D pages, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. Signature below confirms receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025
Jan 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Liliana Silveira and Ryan Fulton conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a Plan of Correction (POC) visit to confirm that citations which were issued on 12/13/24, have been corrected. LPAs were welcomed by, identified themselves, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Brandon Logalla. The following citations were reviewed during today's visit: 1.87555(b)(9) General Food Service Requirements- LPAs observed that food service requirements were met. Citation is being cleared. 2.87555(b)(23) General Food Service Requirements- LPAs observed that food service requirements were met. Citation is being cleared. 3. 8755(b)(26) General Food Service Requirements- LPAs observed that food service requirements were met. Citation is being cleared. 4. 87555(b)(27) General Food Service Requirements- LPAs observed that food service requirements were met. Citation is being cleared. No new deficiencies were identified or cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Brandon Logalla. A copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided to Brandon, signature below confirms receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 13, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced Annual Inspection continuation visit. The Annual Inspection started on 11/22/2024. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensees Brandon and Winnie Logalla. According to the facility’s license, the facility serves six (6) non-ambulatory elderly residents, age 60 and above. During today’s visit, LPA observed five (5) residents at the facility, of which three (3) were non-ambulatory and two (2) were ambulatory. LPA, accompanied by Licensee Brandon Logalla, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was 70 F. Hot water taps accessible to clients in bathroom #1 were 119.5 F and 119.2 F. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per Brandon Logalla, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents and reviewed staff and resident records/files. LPA’s interviews with residents did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Licensee is currently in the process of purchasing active business liability insurance and will submit proof to the CCLD office within 14 business days. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE, LIC 809C) (CONTINUED FROM PAGE ONE, LIC 809) There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. During the walk through in the kitchen LPA observed that there were cooking & dining equipment and utensils present. During the inspection, LPA observed that there was not enough food to meet Title 22 Regulations for 2 days of perishable food items, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food items. LPA also observed that food items in the refrigerator and cupboards required proper storage, and the kitchen required cleaning. Licensee Brandon Logalla immediately corrected the issues and implemented a new system to ensure that the facility meets food standard requirements. Licensee Logalla also reported that the carpets in the bedrooms will be replaced with floor due to old age and odor issues. Note: LPA left the facility to take a 1 hour lunch break and returned to complete the inspection. Five (5) deficiencies and were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 809-D pages). Two (2) technical violations were also issued. A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Licensee for all deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted with Mr. Logalla, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D pages, the LIC 9102 AN pages and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. Signature below confirms receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2024
Nov 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced visit to commence a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Brandon Logalla. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility, reviewed staff and client records, and interviewed residents. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Due to time constraints, a return visit on a subsequent day is needed to complete the annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Brandon, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2024
May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not meet resident's needs. Facility did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents. Residents were not provided with nutritious meals. Facility did not have adequate pest control.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegations. LPA gained access to the facility, identified herself, and met with Brandon Logalla, Administrator to discuss the purpose of the visit. The initial investigation visit on March 5, 2021. LPA reviewed records and conducted a physical inspection of the facility. It was alleged that the facility did not meet resident's needs. Interviews revealed the staff live in at the facility. The staff meet the residents needs by assisting them throughout the night. Interviews revealed if a resident needs anything in the middle of the night the staff will assist them. Interviews revealed there are no cut off times of when care is being provided. No interviews revealed that the facility did not meet resident's needs. Unsubstantiated It was alleged that the facility did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents. Interviews revealed that during the summer the facility runs the air and during the winter the facility runs the heater. Interviews revealed that if the temperature is too hot, or too cold they will turn it down or up to make it comfortable for the residents. Interviews revealed the facility is set at a comfortable temperature. No interviews revealed that the facility did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents. It was alleged that the residents were not provided with nutritious meals. Interviews revealed the resident are served healthy and well balanced meals. The meals consist of meat, vegetables and a starch. Interviews revealed there is one resident that receives a puree diet according to doctors orders. Interviews revealed the food is good and the residents don't have an issue with the foods that are being prepared for them. No interviews revealed that the residents were not provided with nutritious meals. It was alleged that the facility did not have adequate pest control. Interviews revealed there were a few rodents around the facility at the time of the complaint back in 2021. Interviews also revealed they immediately did what they needed to do to resolve the issue. Interviews revealed as soon as it was brought to the administrators attention they acted promptly. No interviews revealed that the facility did not have adequate pest control The investigation did not produce supporting evidence or supporting witness statements to substantiate facility did not meet resident's needs, facility did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents, residents were not provided with nutritious meals and the facility did not have adequate pest control. Based on the evidence obtained from interviews, and record review, the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Brandon Logalla, Administrator and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) was provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210226151707
May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in resident elopement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA was met at the entrance by Administrator, Brandon Logalla. After identifying herself LPA was allowed inside the facility. LPA met with Mr. Logalla with whom the elements of the complaint were discussed. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility visits, record reviews, and interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that lack of supervision resulted in resident elopement. Interviews revealed that there are always two staff that are working on each shift. Resident 1 (R1) had became agitated and was observed by Staff 1 (S1) running out of the facility. R1 AWOL away from the facility and was found a short time later by the sheriff deputies. Interviews revealed that the licensee reported the resident missing. Interviews revealed the facility followed all aspects of their Absentee Notification Plan by contacting police and by contacting their responible party. Interviews with outside sources and staff did not corroborate the allegation that facility staff demonstrated a lack of supervision resulting in an AWOL. Based on the evidence obtained and reviewed, the allegation that lack of supervision resulted in resident elopement is Unsubstantiated, as the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Logalla and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to Mr. Logalla’s at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230428165600
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. The LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Brandon Logalla. The facility was licensed for a capacity of six (6) Elderly non-ambulatory residents. At the time of the visit the facility had six (6) residents. Accompanied by Licensee Logalla, the LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Toilets, and showers were in working order and extra linens were observed to be present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, and meetings. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to clients. Medications were stored, and locked inaccessible to residents. No pools, nor bodies of water were observed on the premises . Per staff, no firearms, nor ammunition were kept at the facility. Fire extinguisher(s) were present, and required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The files which the LPA reviewed were missing documents, including first aid certificates, and resident's physician's reports. Additionally, the facility did not have an infection control plan in place. These deficiencies were cited in an LIC 809D and a plan of correction was jointly formulated with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Logalla, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809D, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 28, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room typesPrivate · Semi-Private

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County