Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Muirfield A Home for the Elderly

Small home·Licensed for 6·Sacramento, California

Licensed since 2018Licence #342700458
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 24, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitNovember 21, 2025CDSS inspection record

Muirfield A Home for the Elderly is a small care home in Sacramento — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2018. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Muirfield A Home for the Elderly

Is Muirfield A Home for the Elderly licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Muirfield A Home for the Elderly licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Muirfield A Home for the Elderly been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Muirfield A Home for the Elderly still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Muirfield A Home for the Elderly cost?

$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,046 to $4,461 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Muirfield A Home for the Elderly take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Carpio, Orlando, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South Sacramento is 3.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Muirfield A Home for the Elderly keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Muirfield A Home for the Elderly license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MUIRFIELD A HOME FOR THE ELDERLY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #342700458. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Carpio, Orlando, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is November 21, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4 RESIDENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,100a month to start

Likely $3,350–$5,050

From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,100a month

Likely $3,350–$5,250

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,250
$4,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,400
$6,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

15 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,700–$5,050.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7541 Muirfield Way, Sacramento, CA 95822Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2018. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 21, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
13
Most recent visit
November 21, 2025
Occupied · September 24, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 23, 2024 to September 24, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20254622024220202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 9 of 11 documents

20254 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/21/25 at 9:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Muirfield home for the elderly for the purpose of conducting a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA and Administrator evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 130 degrees F which does not meet the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed the facility had an older thermometer that may not be reading the temperature accurately. LPA advised to obtain a new thermometer and turn down hot water. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 there were no deficiencies cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2025

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Oct 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

On 10/7/25 at 11:30am Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kevin Gould and Noel Wolf-Petersen conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) inspection to ensure previously issued citation has been corrected and all POC documents completed. LPAs met with staff member who informed LPAs that administrator is currently out of the country (LPA Gould was notified in advance). the staff member present attested to completing training for food services but could not locate the documentation in administrative files and Administrator was unavailable via phone call. LPA spoke to designated substitute who also attested to completed training and said they would be able to send documentation of training to LPA today. No deficiencies noted or cited during today's inspection,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025
Sep 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident. Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirfield A Home for the Elderly RCFE on 9/24/25 at 1:00pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with administrator, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted interviews with two resident and one former resident. All residents interviewed denied being hit or abused by any staff member. Additionally, LPA could obtain no corroborating evidence that R1 did not receive medical attention in a timely manner. No staff member interviewed identified any delay in care or treatment for R1. LPA had received incident report for reported hospital visit to address health concerns for R1. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of personal rights are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250821091850
Sep 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff engaged in inappropriate interactions with residents in care

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirefield A Home For the Elderly RCFE on 9/24/25 at 1:00pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted several collateral inspections at current and previous placements for R1. No staff member has observed an individual visiting R1 or observed R1 in a romantic relationship with a caregiver from the facility at their current or former placement. Staff members interviewed denied the allegations. LPA conducted interview with R1's authorized representative and no other corroborating information was obtained. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated LPA conducted a collateral interview with R1 who does believe a relationship existed but was unable to provide any corroborating evidence and some information provided such as visitations was denied by staff at R1's current placement and former skilled nursing facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of personal rights are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250903154616
Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not serve residents food of good quality

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirfield home for the elderly at 9:30am to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the LPA observations during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated. LPA observed several expired food items in the fridge and multiple items stored without proper dating. LPA observed spaghetti with meat sauce that per staff member was prepared the prior evening to be served for lunch. LPA observed the pan was at room temperature and did not meet food storage requirements. LPA observed staff discard the food at LPAs request. LPA explained the storing of food could promote bacterial growth and posed a danger if consumed by residents. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of food services is substantiated. Report continued on LIC 9099-C. Substantiated The following deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the home. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Personal Rights are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250801124152

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(23) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2025

General Food Service: All readily perishable foods or beverages capable of supporting rapid and progressive growth of micro-organisms which can cause food infections or food intoxications shall be stored in covered containers at appropriate temperatures. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observations of food being stored without appropriate dates and spaghetti to be served for lunch stored at room temperature which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee has agreed to obtain training from an outside or online organization regarding food preparation and storage. facility will provide documentation of training for all staff by the POC due date.

Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff serving residents expired food.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirfield home for the elderly at 9:30am to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the LPA observations during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated. LPA observed several expired food items in the fridge and multiple items stored without proper dating. LPA observed spaghetti with meat sauce that per staff member was prepared the prior evening to be served for lunch. LPA observed the pan was at room temperature and did not meet food storage requirements. LPA observed staff discard the food at LPAs request. LPA explained the storing of food could promote bacterial growth and posed a danger if consumed by residents. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of food services is substantiated. Report continued on LIC 9099-C. Substantiated The following deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the home. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of medications are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250821091850

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2025

General Food Service: All food shall be of good quality. Commercial foods shall be approved by appropriate federal, state and local authorities. Food in damaged containers shall not be accepted, used or retained. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observations of expired food items and food not being stored correctly to prevent contamination or bacterial growth which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee has agreed to obtain training from an outside or online organization regarding food preparation and storage. facility will provide documentation of training for all staff by the POC due date.

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/11/24 at 9:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Muirfield A Home for the Elderly for the purpose of conducting a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with licensee, Marilyn Carpio and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA and Administrator evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed the facility is still pre-pouring medications daily and LPA discussed the updated 2021 medications guide which discontinued the practice. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 130 degrees F and LPA observed the licensee turn down the hot water heater and on a second testing recorded a temperature of 118 degrees which meets the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. LPA Requested the following documents for facility file: LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility, LIC 500 personnel report, LIC 9020 client roster and current administrator certificate. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 there were no deficiencies cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2024
Feb 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights: Staff hit resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at Muirfield A Home for the Elderly on 2/23/24 at 1:30pm to inform the licensee of complaint allegation mentioned above. During this investigation LPA Gould interviewed S1, R1, R2 and R3 (See confidential name list LIC-811 dated 2/23/24). Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be substantiated because All residents interviewed denied the allegations including the identified alleged victim. All statements obtained indicate that staff were attempting to wake resident who was making a disturbance in their sleep. Resident states she now understand staff were attempting to wake her and is what they also informed the police when they responded to the home. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Personal Rights are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies noted or cited per California Code Regulation, TITLE 22 Exit interview was conducted with the facility administrator. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240221133222
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Annual/Random

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Wallace conducted unannounced required annual inspection visit. LPA met with House Manager and explained purpose of visit. Administrator certificate expires on 11/8/2024. The facility is licensed to served six non-ambulatory residents. Hospice waiver approved for four residents. There are currently six residents and no residents are on hospice at this time. LPA and house manager inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the common area, kitchen, dining area, resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, laundry area, and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed the facility is clean and in good repair. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. Hot water temperature was observed to be 114.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility thermostat observed at 75 degrees Fahrenheit. Food supply is adequate for two day perishable and seven day nonperishable. LPA observed knives and toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to clients. Smoke and carbon detectors were in good repair. Fire extinguisher was last inspected on 11/17/2022 and first aid kit was current. LPA checked medication storage and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. The facility mitigation plan was submitted to community care licensing and it was approved on 2/16/2021. LPA reviewed and compared resident medication vs. resident medication logs. LPA reviewed four resident and four staff files, including criminal record clearances. All staff are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA requested the following updated documents to be submitted via email to community care licensing by 12/4/2023: LIC 308 - Designation of Administrator, copy of deed, copy of administrator's certificate, and liability insurance. ruth.wallace@dss.ca.gov Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 no deficiencies were observed or cited. Exit interview held with house manager. A report and LIC 811 (Confidential Names) was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Sacramento County