Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Mugunghwa SilvertownLicense #197606175 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareMugunghwa SilvertownLicense #197606175 · 1423 S. Manhattan Place, Los Angeles, CA · (323) 373-1980Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Los Angeles/Mugunghwa Silvertown
Map · 1423 S. Manhattan Place

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,600/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,850 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (323) 373-1980

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

MS

Call Mugunghwa Silvertown

Los Angeles · Licensed for 56

(323) 373-1980

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Large community · Licensed for 56 · Los Angeles

Mugunghwa Silvertown

1423 S. Manhattan Place, Los Angeles, CA 90019 · Licensed since 2005

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Mugunghwa Silvertown

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,600 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,850 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 56: a large care communityThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 24 residents

Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
56 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 24 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. NON-AMBULATORY 1ST FLOOR ONLY.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

As needs change

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Mugunghwa Silvertown: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,600a month to start

Likely $3,550–$5,850

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$4,600likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,600likely $3,550–$5,850

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,550–$6,000
$4,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,350–$9,150
$7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $8,795

$2,500$8,795

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,500–$7,450.

  • Garden Silver TownLos Angeles · 1.5 mi · Large community
    $2,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Commonwealth Royale Guest HomeLos Angeles · 2.3 mi · Large community
    $2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Kingsley ManorLos Angeles · 3.1 mi · Large community
    $3,594Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
  • City View LaLos Angeles · 3.1 mi · Large community
    $6,000Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
  • Hayworth TerraceLos Angeles · 3.7 mi · Large community
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Leonard on Beverly A Clearwater CommunityLos Angeles · 3.8 mi · Large community
    $8,240Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sunny Hills Assisted Living (Memory Care)Los Angeles · 4.2 mi · Large community
    $2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Pinnacles at BurtonLos Angeles · 4.5 mi · Large community
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Oakmont of Beverly HillsBeverly Hills · 4.6 mi · Large community
    $8,795Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Belmont Village HollywoodLos Angeles · 4.6 mi · Large community
    $4,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (2)Room types · Common areas
  • Room typesStudio

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasIndoor Common Areas

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (1)Meals provided
  • Meals provided

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Religious services off site
  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Where it is

1423 S. Manhattan Place, Los Angeles, CA 90019Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1California Hospital Medical Center - Los AngelesHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.6 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197606175 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 8 of 12 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20264 state visits · 5 documents

Sep 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elena Mallett conducted a subsequent complaint investigation to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA was met by Head Caregiver Young Mee Shin and the purpose of the visit was explained. Licensee Eugene Choi and Administrator Hyun Joo Watanabe were contacted by phone. Administrator joined the visit a half hour later.Licensee joined the visit an hour later. On the 05/07/26 visit, the investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the facility, collected resident and staff rosters and conducted interviews with the Licensee and Administrator. No immediate health and safety risks were observed. On today's visit the investigation consisted of a tour of the facility and interviews with four (4) staff , four(4) residents and four (4) family members of residents. The following documents were collected: staff and resident rosters, facility list of residents who left facility since January 2026, facility list of residents recieving Hospice care since January 2026, and Resident 6 (R6)'s Face sheet, Admissions Agreement and Needs and Services Plan. There were no immediate health and safety risks observed during LPA's tour of the facility. Regarding the allegation:Staff unlawfully evicted a resident in care. It is alleged that a resident was evicted Unsubstantiated from the facility because the resident wanted to utilize a different hospice care provider than the hospice care provider that was preferred by the facility. Interviews with four (4) out of four (4) staff members did not reveal that any resident was evicted for not utilizing a particular hospice care provider. Four (4) out of four (4) staff members stated that there had been no residents evicted from the facility this year and that residents can choose whichever hospice service provider they prefer without being evicted. Licensee and Administrator stated that families who ask for assistance in finding a hospice care provider will be provided with names of agencies that have served residents at the facility in the past but the facility clearly communicates to the family that the resident can choose any hospice provider that the resident wants. Interviews with four(4) of four (4) residents did not reveal that staff unlawfully evicted a resident in care, Two (2) of four (4) residents stated they were not aware of any resident that had been evicted. Two (2) of four (4) residents stated residents had no knowledge about the eviction process. Interviews with four (4) out of four (4) residents revealed that the residents were not aware about hospice services or about which hospice agencies provide services at the facility. Interviews with three (3) out of four (4) family members of residents revealed that the facility does not evict residents for not utilizing a particular hospice service and that residents are free to choose whichever hospice service the resident prefers. One (1) out of four (4) family members stated that the facility will only allow residents to utilize a particular hospice service and not a hospice service of the resident's own choosing. Three family members of residents stated that the facility offers names of hospice providers that have serviced the facility in the past but did not communicate that these providers are the only providers permitted at the facility. Three family members of residents stated residents will not be evicted from the facility for not choosing a certain hospice provider. One family member of a resident stated that the facility did not evict anyone for not using a particular hospice agency but clearly communicated that the facility only wanted residents receiving hospice care from a particular agency. LPA' s record review did not show that any residents were evicted from the facility in 2026.LPA's record review revealed that one agency provided hospice care to four out of five residents receiving hospice services at the facility. The investigation did not reveal that staff unlawfully evicted a resident in care. Based on interviews with staff, residents, residents' family members and a review of facility records there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Hyun Joo Watanabe and a copy of this Licensing report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 4, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260501092512
Jun 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted the required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Jessica Watanabe, and explained the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Eugene Choi, arrived shortly thereafter to join the visit. The facility is licensed for 56 residents, of which 24 may be non-ambulatory. The non-ambulatory residents are approved for the 1st floor only. The facility is a two-story building. The first floor consists of the administrator’s office, resident bedrooms, dining area, kitchen, activity room, laundry room, and medication room. There is a covered outdoor area. The second floor consists of resident bedrooms and an activity room. There is one elevator on the premises. The smoke detectors are interconnected and linked to the fire department. Food supplies are sufficient. There are no items obstructing the walkways. The facility is clean and free of odor. The hot water temperature was measured within 105-120 degrees F. The liability insurance is maintained at $1,000,000 per occurrence and $3,000,000 in total annual aggregate. LPA reviewed 6 resident files and their medications. Medications are given as prescribed by the physician. Resident files have a physician's report and reappraisal form, however, LPA issued a technical violation for not having them reassessed every 12 months or sooner. LPA reviewed 3 staff files. The administrator’s (Hyun Joo Watanabe) certificate expires on 11/18/27. Staff did not have current First Aid and/or CPR certificates. Facility did not have the updated Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610E) and did not document drills conducted. Deficiencies are issued on the LIC809D. An exit interview was held with the administrator. A copy of this report, along with appeal rights, was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2026

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

May 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elena Mallett conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to the facility to review the files of Staff #1-Staff #5 (S1-S5) . LPA met with Administrator Hyun Joo Watanabe (aka Jessica Shin) and the purpose of the visit was explained. Licensee Eugene Choi joined the visit at 10:30 AM. Upon review of the staff files LPA observed the following: S1 has been the Licensee/Executive Director since 2018 and has a criminal background clearance but is not associated to the facility. S2 has worked as a Housekeeper since 12/27/2021 and has a criminal background clearance but is not associated to the facility. S3 has worked as a Housekeeper at the facility since 03/07/2026 with no criminal background clearance and is not associated with the facility. S4 has worked as Kitchen staff at the facility since 03/04/2022 with no criminal background clearance and is not associated with the facility. S5 has worked as Kitchen staff at the facility since 03/17/2023 with no criminal background clearance and is not associated with the facility. . Per Title 22 a deficiency will be cited today , see 809-D, and Civil penalties will be assessed in the amount of $500 per staff member. The total civil penalty amount is $2,500.00. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Eugene Choi and Administrator Hyun Joo Watanabe (aka Jessica Shin) and a copy of this Licensing report was provided along with Appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 19, 2026

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review...(3) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) The above requirement was not met as evidenced by S1 and S2 were not assoicated to the facility in LIS or Guardian. The facility did not transfer S1 and S2 criminal record clearance. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to all residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026

Plan of correction: By POC due date, Administrator will submit a signed statement of understanding of the regulation cited and fax it to office Fax. S1 and S2 will not resume work at the facility until S1 and S2 are associated in Guardian.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 19, 2026

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review ...(2) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department The above requirement was not met as evidenced by S3,S4 and S5 were working at the facility and were not cleared and assoicated to the facility in Guardian. Facility did not obtain a criminal record clearance for S3,S4 and S5. This poses an immediate Health and safety risk to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026

Plan of correction: By POC due date Administrator will fax a signed statement of understanding of the cited regulation to LPA via the office Fax. S3, S4 and S5 will not resume work at the facility until facility obtains a criminal background clearance for S3, S4 and S5 and assoicates S3, S4 and S5 to the facility in Guardian.

May 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have a qualified Administrator

Licensing Program Anayst (LPA) Elena Mallett arrived at the facility for an unannounced Complaint investigation. LPA was met by staff in charge Miyeong Kim. Staff Kim contacted Licensee Eugene Choi by phone he arrived at the facility approximately 45 minutes later. LPA requested and obtained resident and staff rosters. The investigation conisisted of interviews with Administrator, Licensee, and three staff (S1-S5) and with five residents(R1-R-5). The following documents were obtained from the Administrator's personnel file; copy of government ID, Application for Employment,Health Screening, proof ofAdministrator's RCFE certificate via Licensings website, copies of ongoing Continuating Education certificates. LPA toured the physical plant and no health and safety risks were observed. Regarding the allegation: Facility does not have a qualified Administrator: It is alleged that the current Administator is not qualified to be an Administrator. (5) out (5) staff stated that current Administrator is qualified to be an Administrator. (5) out ( 5) staff state that current Administrator addresses resident and staff needs effectively. (5) our (5) staff state current Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Facility does not have a qualified Administrator: It is alleged that the current Administrator is not qualified to be an Administrator. (5) out (5) staff stated that current Administrator is qualified to be an Administrator. (5) out ( 5) staff state that current Administrator addresses resident and staff needs effectively. (5) our (5) staff state current Administrator treats staff and residents well. (5) out of (5) staff state that current Administrator is present at the facility on a regular basis. (5) out (5) staff state that current Administrator is qualified to be an Administrator. (5) out (5) residents state that current Administrator is qualified to be an Administrator. (5) out (5) residents state that the current Administrator treats staff and residents well. (5) out (5) residents state that current Administrator is present at the facility on a regular basis. Licensee/Business Manager Eugene Choi and current Administrator state that Administrator Watanabe has a current Administrator's certificate and and keeps up to date with Continuing Education units. Current Administrator states that current Administrator worked for several years at other Senior Care Facilities that provided the experience needed to be lead a facility. LPA reviewed Administrator Watanabe's Personnel file and found documentation of required experience, training and education for the job of RCFE Administrator along with Health screening, TB test. Review of Licensing databases show Hyun Joo Watanabe ( aka Jessica Shin) to have a criminal background clearance and RCFE Administrator Certificate that is from 11/19/2025-11/18/2027. Administrator's Personnel file contained a screen shot from CDSS website showing Administrator's certificate held from 11/10/23-11/18/25. LPA observed the facility to be well maintained and LPA observed current Administrator to interact professionally with staff and residents during visit. Through interviews, record review and observation the investigation revealed that the facility has a qualified Administrator. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was held with Licensee Eugene Choi and a copy of this Licensing report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260501092512

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

May 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elena Mallett made an unannounced Case Management visit to facility to review staff files. LPA was met by Licensee Eugene Choi and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA requested and obtained goverment IDs from S1,S2,S3,S6,S7,S8,S9,S10. LPA requested and obtained job applications for S3,S4,S7,S9 and S10. Due to time constraints, visit will be continued on another day An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Eugene Choi and a copy of this Licensing Report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility only admits residents based on race.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Licensee Eugene and Administrator Jessica and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: On 2/22/24 LPA Alma Gonzalez conducted the initial 10-day visit and requested a copy of Staff and Resident rosters, LPA conducted a phone interview with Licensee Eugene Choin and an interview with Administrator Jessica Watanabe, and toured entire facility inside and out with Administrator. On 3/4/24 LPA Gonzalez conducted a subsequent visit to gather information pertaining to allegation and obtained copies of Staff and Resident Rosters. LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1-3 (S1-3) and Residents 1-5 (R1-5). LPA additionally requested copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. On 8/21/25 LPA Tena Herrera conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. (Continued on the LIC9099-C page) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility only admits residents based on race. It is alleged that the facility turned away individuals that were interested in moving in for not being Korean. LPA Gonzalez conducted 5 staff interviews in total, and each denied the above allegation, all 5 Staff stated that they have never discriminated against anyone for any reason, including race. Each staff confirmed they have been provided with non-discrimination training and have never observed another staff discriminating towards any of the residents or potential residents. All 5 staff additionally stated that there are other races besides Korean that live at the facility. LPA Gonzalez obtained a list of Non-Korean residents that have resided at facility from 2017-2023 (3 of which are still currently residing at facility). LPA Gonzalez interviewed 5 Residents and 5 out of 5 Residents denied the above allegation and stated that they have never felt discriminated against, interviews with R3 and R4 stated that there are individuals that are not of Korean descent that live at the facility. Interview with Licensee Eugene Choi explained that although the facility is known in the Korean community this is mainly because many of the facilities residents used to live in Koreatown and preferred to stay close to the neighborhood, a google search to see how far facility is from Koreatown it confirmed there is a 1.7 mile distance from facility location to Koreatown. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff/residents and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was emailed to mugunghwasilvertown@gmail.comthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025 · control 28-AS-20240216083741
May 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitDeficiency pages: Type B, Type A

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted the required annual inspection on 5/23/25. LPA met with licensee, Eugene Choi, and explained the purpose of the visit. The administrator, Jessica Watanabe, also assisted with the visit. The facility is licensed for 56 residents, of which 24 may be non-ambulatory. The non-ambulatory residents are approved for the 1st floor only. The facility is a two-story building. The first floor consists of the administrator’s office, resident bedrooms, dining area, kitchen, activity room, laundry room, and medication room. There is a covered outdoor area. The second floor consists of resident bedrooms and an activity room. There is one elevator on the premises. The smoke detectors are interconnected and linked to the fire department. Food supplies are sufficient and are purchased at least 4 times a week. There are no items obstructing the walkways. The facility appears clean and free of odor. The hot water temperature was measured within 105-120 degrees F. The facility could not provide proof of the liability insurance covering injuries in the amount of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $3,000,000 in total annual aggregate. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and their medications. The files have the required documents. Medications are centrally stored in the med room. LPA observed that the evening medications for Resident #1 were not given for approximately 8 days and Resident #3 was not given the Mirtazapine medication daily. LPA reviewed 4 staff files. The administrator’s (Hyun Joo Watanabe) certificate expires on 11/18/25. Staff #2 did not have a completed health screening on file. The administrator confirmed that staff did not receive training during the 2024 year. LPA provided a technical violation for not having emergency drills conducted at least quarterly for each shift. The deficiencies are issued on the LIC809D. An exit interview was held with the administrator. A copy of this report, along with appeal rights, was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(f) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 6, 2025

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (f) All personnel, including the licensee and administrator, shall be in good health, and physically and mentally capable of performing assigned tasks. Good physical health shall be verified by a health screening, including a chest x-ray or an intradermal test, performed by a physician not more than six (6) months prior to or seven (7) days after employment or licensure. A report shall be made of each screening, signed by the examining physician. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which staff #2 did not have a health screening done upon hire which posesd a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure all employees have a health screening performed by a physician on file and ensure that Staff #2 obtains a health screening by due date 6/6/25.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.605 · Plan of correction due date: May 30, 2025

On and after July 1, 2015, all residential care facilities for the elderly...shall maintain liability insurance covering injury to residents and guests in the amount of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and three million dollars ($3,000,000) in the total annual aggregate, caused by the negligent acts or omissions to act of, or neglect by, the licensee or its employees. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which the liability insurance was not available upon request which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure the liability insurance is maintained for the facility at all times. The proof of insurance with the required amount shall be submitted to LPA by 5/30/25.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC1569.625(b)(2 · Plan of correction due date: May 30, 2025

(2) In addition to paragraph (1), training requirements shall also include an additional 20 hours annually, eight hours of which shall be dementia care training, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626, and four hours of which shall be specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696. This training shall be administered on the job, or in a classroom setting, or both, and may include online training. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in staff were not given the annual 20 hours training which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure that the staff are receiving training during the year to fulfill the requirements. A statement acknowledging this regulation shall be submitted to LPA by 5/30/25.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 24, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 2 of the residents' medications were not given as ordered by the physician which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure the medications are being given as prescribed by the physician. An in-service training shall be given to all staff handling medications and submit the log to LPA by 5/24/25.

20241 state visit · 1 document

Jul 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an annual inspection visit. LPA was allowed entry by Administrator Jessica Watanabe. LPA discussed the purpose of today’s visit. . The facility is licensed to serve (56) elderly residents of which 24 may be non-ambulatory. There are currently three (3) non-ambulatory residents in placement. All non-ambulatory residents are only on the 1st floor. The facility is a two story building which consists of the following: 12 resident rooms located on the first floor and 16 resident rooms located on the second floor. The 1st floor consist of the kitchen, dining room, activity room and medication room. The second floor consists of resident rooms and one resting room for residents. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: Facility does has an Infection Control Plan in place. Operational Requirements: Facility is adhering to the operational requirements. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPA toured facility grounds. The furniture in the dining room was adequate and the kitchen was clean. The appliances were working properly. The refrigerators and freezer are set at appropriate temperatures. LPA toured resident rooms which were randomly chosen for inspection on both floors. There are smoke detectors and fire extinguishers located throughout the building. The hallways and stairways are clear and free of any obstructions. Resident rooms were observed to be clean, properly furnished and have the required linen which were in good condition. There was adequate lighting throughout the facility. All resident rooms had appropriate storage for resident's personal belongings. The bathrooms have the required grab bars near the **Continued on LIC809C** toilet and in the shower. Showers also have non-skid materials. The hot water was tested and was between in random resident rooms and was between 105.2 - 110.4 degrees, which is within Title 22 regulations. Restrooms were observed to be clean, and operational. There is 1 elevator and the elevator was operating at the time of the visit. There is no pool or large bodies of water on the premises. A comfortable temperature was maintained throughout the facility. Staffing: Facility is adhering to staffing requirements. Personnel Records-Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed staff files for Facility Administrator and Staff 1-3 (S1-3). Staff have current First Aid/CPR certification. Staff have their Health Screening and Tuberculosis Screening on file. Resident Rights-Information: Resident rights are posted and included in Resident files. Planned Activities: Activity schedule is posted. Food Service: There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and (1) week of non-perishable items. The food is properly stored in the refrigerator. Posted menu observed. Pesticides and cleaning supplies are kept away from the food preparation areas. Kitchen is kept clean and free from rodents and other vermin. Plates, cups and utensils are kept cleaned and stored properly. Dining areas have adequate seating. Resident Records-Incident Reports: LPA reviewed Resident files for Resident 1-4 (R1-4). Resident files are maintained at the facility. Resident files have the required documents. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has a Disaster Preparedness plan in place. Residents with Special Health Needs: Per Administrator, there are no residents with postural supports and no residents with prohibited health conditions. Per Administrator, there are (0) residents utilizing oxygen equipment. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are stored/ locked inside the medication room and are inaccessible to residents. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Jessica Watanabe.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Jul 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Licensee Eugene Choi and Administrator Hyun Joo (Jessica) Watanabe. LPA Gonzalez explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to serve (56) elderly residents of which 24 may be non-ambulatory. There are currently only two (2) non-ambulatory residents in placement. All non-ambulatory residents are only on the 1st floor. The facility is a two story building and there are 12 resident rooms located on the first floor and 16 resident rooms located on the second floor. The 1st floor consist of the kitchen, dining room, activity room and medication room. The furniture in the dining room was adequate and the kitchen was clean. The appliances were working properly. The refrigerators and freezer are set at appropriate temperatures. There was sufficient perishable and non-perishable food and the food is stored properly. The second floor consists of resident rooms and one resting room for residents. Resident rooms were randomly chosen for review on both floors. There are smoke detectors and fire extinguishers located throughout the building. The hallways and stairways are clear and free of any obstructions. Resident rooms are properly furnished and have the required linen which were in good condition. There was adequate lighting throughout the facility. All resident rooms had appropriate storage for resident's personal belongings. The bathrooms have the required grab bars near the toilet and in the shower. Showers also have non-skid materials. The hot water was tested and was between 105.2 - 110.4 degrees, which is within the required 105 - 120 degrees. Restrooms were observed to be clean, and operational. There is 1 elevator and the elevator was operating at the time of the visit. There is no pool or large bodies of water on the premises. A comfortable temperature was maintained in throughout the facility. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 809-C) Fire extinguishers were charged, and smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were operable. A review of the Medication Records Administration (MAR) was observed to be maintained in order and were completed accurately. During the visit, LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents, and sanitizing stations in common areas and restrooms. LPA observed First Aid Kit maintained in order and complete. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). All mandated inspection control posters, required notifications and postings were observed throughout the facility in the different buildings located on bulletin boards and all included: Resident Personal rights, Facility sketch, Visitor policy, complaint procedures, menu and emergency disaster plan. Common areas and all indoor and outdoor passages were free of obstruction. Activity schedules observed posted throughout the facility. Administrator certificate is current and expires on 11/18/2023. LPA reviewed Resident 1-5 (R1-5) facility files, and Staff 1-5 (S1-5) personnel files and observed that all files were in order and complete and had the required completed documents and training. Resident files contained admission agreements, Physician's Reports, Appraisal, TB clearance, Functional Capability Assessment, Physician's Orders, medical consent, and medication records. Staff files criminal background clearance and training, health clearance, food handling certificates, and 1st Aid/CPR training was observed. No deficiencies during this inspection visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Jessica Watanabe and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2023

20221 state visit · 1 document

Jun 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an unannounced Annual Required / Infection Control visit to the above facility. LPA was met by Administrator Jessica Watanabe and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. There are currently (34) residents in the facility. The facility is licensed to serve (56) elderly residents of which 24 may be non-ambulatory. There is currently only one (1) non-ambulatory resident in placement. LPA and Medication Technician Ellen Chong toured the facility's physical plant inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. LPA toured the common areas, resident rooms which include private restrooms, kitchen, dining area, public restrooms and outside patio/ smoking area. The facility is a two story building and there are 12 resident rooms located on the first floor and 16 resident rooms located on the second floor. All common areas were properly furnished and appeared comfortable. All rooms that were inspected have private restrooms. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture for comfort and safety and had sufficient lighting. All indoor and outdoor passages were free of obstruction. All bathrooms were observed to be clean and had the required hygiene items. Bathrooms all have a supply of hand soap and paper towels. Bathrooms had grab bars for each toilet, bathtub/shower and LPA also observed non-skid mats and/ or strips in resident bathtubs/ shower. Linens and personal hygiene supplies are adequate, hazardous toxins and/or sharp items are inaccessible to residents. The hot water temperature measured 107.2, which is within the required 105 - 120 degrees. All bathrooms were observed to be clean. There is sufficient lighting throughout the facility. There are no large bodies of water on the premises such as pools. The grounds are well groomed and there were no hazards observed. Cleaning supplies are inaccessible to clients. The front exterior of the facility is clear of debris with steps and ramp leading to the facility entrance. Trash containers have covered lids. There are no security bars nor weapons on the premises. Laundry room is located in the first floor. LPA observed the facility to be in good repair. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detector were in compliance and operational. Medications are properly stored, locked and inaccessible to clients. The following were observed/inspected: COVID-19 Infection Control Practices (including signs) were observed at the entrance of this facility, and in all common rooms bathrooms and hallways. Facility is conducting COVID-19 screening for all visitors. Residents are able to use a designated isolation room that will be used as isolation room if a COVID-19 positive case should arise. 30 day supply of medication for residents Facility has an adequate amount of PPE and facility has enough PPE for 30 days. Residents were socially distanced according to local public health guidelines. Staff responsible for direct care and supervision were observed wearing masks. Sufficient supply of perishable for 2 days and non-perishable foods for 7 days were observed. Hand Sanitizer: Available throughout the facility for client use. The resident's temperature is checked and logged as needed if they are exhibiting any symptoms. Staff temperatures are checked and logged as needed if they are exhibiting any symptoms. Staff and residents are tested only if exhibiting any COVID-19 symptoms. All residents and staff are fully vaccinated and have received both booster vaccines for COVID-19. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA did not observe any deficiencies, therefore no citations were issued at this time. An exit interview conducted with Administrator Jessica Watanabe and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2022

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Nov 1, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not following COVID-19 guidelines.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to gather information pertaining to the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Licensee Eugene Choi and Administrator Jessica Watanabe and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: On 11/01/21, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with the following facility staff: Licensee Eugene Choi, and Administrator Jessica Watanabe. LPA collected copies of Staff and Resident Rosters and Visitor Sign-In Sheet dated 9/4/21 - 11/1/21. LPA also reviewed facility Mitigation Plan. (See LIC9099C for continuation) Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation, Facility is not following COVID-19 guidelines, it is alleged that facility staff did not conduct COVID-19 screening on two separate occasions. Facility administrator was allegedly educated on the importance of screening visitors upon entry to the facility on 8/2/21 and subsequently did not screen the same visitor on a follow up visit conducted on 10/6/21. Interview conducted with Administrator Jessica Watanabe revealed that facility staff are following COVID-19 guidelines and do screen visitors. She stated that visitors have to sign in and their temperatures are taken and logged. She stated that the facility does not get too many visitors and that many visitors conduct their visits outside in the visiting area located in the outside patio. Administrator stated that she did not screen or take the temperature of representatives from agencies such as CCLD (Community Care Licensing Division or LTCO (Long Term Care Ombudsman) as she is aware that those agencies conduct testing and their own screening process prior to the agency representatives conducting on site visits to facilities. Interview conducted with Licensee Eugene Choi revealed that facility is following COVID-19 guidelines at all times and stated that facility will now also ensure that visitors from any government or local state agency are also screened as well as their temperatures taken. On 11/1/21, LPA Gonzalez was not screened and temperature was not taken by facility staff upon entry into the facility. LPA reviewed facility mitigation plan and observed that mitigation plan states that anyone entering the facility signs in and has their temperature taken as well as symptoms checked and anyone entering the facility is required to wear a mask inside. LPA observed all staff wearing masks. LPA also reviewed visitor sign-in sheet and observed that visitors have been screened and have had their temperature checked and logged. Based on interview conducted with facility staff and LPA review documents and observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above mentioned allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited according to Title 22. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Jessica Watanabe. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211029134624

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.50(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 2, 2021

The department may deny an application for a license or may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter upon any of the following grounds and in the manner provided in this chapter: Conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either an individual in or receiving services from the facility or the people of the State of California This requirement was not met by evidence of: On 11/1/21, LPA was not screened and temperature was not taken upon entry into the facility per COVID-19 Infection control recommendation. In addition, Administrator stated that they did not screen representatives from agencies such as CCLD or LTCO due to those agencies doing their own screening. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee and Administrator agreed to ensure that facility is following California Dept of Public Health and CCLD requirements. Licensee/ Administrator will submit proof of staff re-training in COVID-19 infection control requirements, and will maintain a safe and healthful environment for residents and staff.

Jun 29, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an unannounced Annual Required / Infection Control visit to the above facility. LPA was met by Administrator Jessica Watanabe and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. There are currently (31) residents in the facility. The facility is licensed to serve (56) elderly residents of which 24 may be non-ambulatory. There is currently only one (1) non-ambulatory resident in placement. LPA and Administrator Jessica Watanabe toured the facility's physical plant inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. LPA toured the common areas, resident rooms which include private restrooms, kitchen, dining area, public restrooms and outside patio/ smoking area. The facility is a two story building and there are 12 resident rooms located on the first floor and 16 resident rooms located on the second floor. All common areas were properly furnished and appeared comfortable. All rooms that were inspected have private restrooms. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture for comfort and safety and had sufficient lighting. All indoor and outdoor passages were free of obstruction. All bathrooms were observed to be clean and had the required hygiene items. Bathrooms all have a supply of hand soap and paper towels. Bathrooms had grab bars for each toilet, bathtub/shower and LPA also observed non-skid mats and/ or strips in resident bathtubs/ shower. Linens and personal hygiene supplies are adequate, hazardous toxins and/or sharp items are inaccessible to residents. The hot water temperature measured 117.2, which is within the required 105 - 120 degrees. All bathrooms were observed to be clean. There is sufficient lighting throughout the facility. There are no large bodies of water on the premises such as pools. The grounds are well groomed and there were no hazards observed. Cleaning supplies are inaccessible to clients. The front exterior of the facility is clear of debris with steps and ramp leading to the facility entrance. Trash containers have covered lids. There are no security bars nor weapons on the premises. There is a first floor laundry room with washer/dryer machines for resident and staff use and they are in operable condition. LPA observed that required documents are posted as mandated. First aid kit is fully stocked with manual, smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detector were in compliance and operational. Medications are properly stored, locked and inaccessible to clients. Resident Medications and files are current. Staff files are current. LPA observed an ample supply of perishable and nonperishable food. The facility is in good repair. During the visit, LPA observed the facility infection control practices. LPA observed a sanitizing station at the facility entry, visitors are logged and temperature checked, sanitizer/soap in the staff bathroom and additional sanitation supplies are locked in the garage. LPA observed hand sanitizer stations throughout the facility. LPA observed facility staff wearing masks, 2 resident bedroom located in the first floor will be converted to an isolation rooms (when needed) and required postings throughout the facility. The residents temperature's are checked and logged twice a day in the AM and PM. Facility has an adequate amount of PPE and facility has enough PPE for 30 days. According to the California Code of Regulations, LPA did not observe any deficiencies, therefore no citations were issued at this time. An exit interview conducted with Administrator Jessica Watanabe and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2021

32 of 56 beds were occupied at the September 4, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

S.M. Healthcare, Inc., licensed since 2005.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2005, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
11
Total complaints
3
Substantiated allegations
1
Type A citations
1
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2005, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations10
Type B citations01
Substantiated allegations12
Total complaints36

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Mugunghwa Silvertown

Is Mugunghwa Silvertown licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Mugunghwa Silvertown licensed for?

56 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Mugunghwa Silvertown been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Mugunghwa Silvertown still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Mugunghwa Silvertown cost?

$4,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,550–$5,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size in Los Angeles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $6,311 a month, and the middle figure is $3,594 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Mugunghwa Silvertown take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by S.M. Healthcare, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

California Hospital Medical Center - Los Angeles is 2.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Mugunghwa Silvertown keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Mugunghwa Silvertown license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MUGUNGHWA SILVERTOWN”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197606175. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 56 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to S.M. Healthcare, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Los Angeles · 0.8 mi

    St John of God Residence

    Mid-size home · licensed for 40

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$6,100

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 0.9 mi

    St. Richard Pampuri

    Large community · licensed for 70

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,650

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 0.9 mi

    St John Grande

    Large community · licensed for 51

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,400 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 1.1 mi

    Rise and Shine

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,200–$7,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 1.1 mi

    Forever Young

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,600 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,550–$6,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 1.1 mi

    Forever Young Again

    Small home · licensed for 4

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,050–$7,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
MS

Call Mugunghwa Silvertown

Los Angeles · Licensed for 56

(323) 373-1980

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Mugunghwa Silvertown

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages