Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Mugunghwa Silvertown

Large community·Licensed for 56·Los Angeles, California

Licensed since 2005Licence #197606175
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,550 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,750
  • Home sizeLicensed for 56Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit42 of 56 beds occupiedAugust 21, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 26, 2026CDSS inspection record

Mugunghwa Silvertown is a large care community in Los Angeles — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 56 residents since 2005. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Mugunghwa Silvertown

Is Mugunghwa Silvertown licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Mugunghwa Silvertown licensed for?

56 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Mugunghwa Silvertown been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Mugunghwa Silvertown still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Mugunghwa Silvertown cost?

$4,550 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 16 other homes of a similar licensed size in Los Angeles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $6,148 a month, and the middle figure is $3,547 (n = 16 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Mugunghwa Silvertown take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by S.M. Healthcare, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

California Hospital Medical Center - Los Angeles is 2.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Mugunghwa Silvertown keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Mugunghwa Silvertown license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MUGUNGHWA SILVERTOWN”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197606175. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 56 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to S.M. Healthcare, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 26, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 24 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
56 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 24 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. NON-AMBULATORY 1ST FLOOR ONLY.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,550a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,750

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,550a month

Likely $3,500–$5,900

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,550likely $3,500–$5,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,900
$4,550
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$9,000
$6,550
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,500–$7,200.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1423 S. Manhattan Place, Los Angeles, CA 90019Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2005. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 26, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
June 26, 2026
Occupied · August 21, 2025 visit
42 of 56 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 1, 2021 to August 21, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints2typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2005.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020252202024110202311020221102021221

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted the required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Jessica Watanabe, and explained the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Eugene Choi, arrived shortly thereafter to join the visit. The facility is licensed for 56 residents, of which 24 may be non-ambulatory. The non-ambulatory residents are approved for the 1st floor only. The facility is a two-story building. The first floor consists of the administrator’s office, resident bedrooms, dining area, kitchen, activity room, laundry room, and medication room. There is a covered outdoor area. The second floor consists of resident bedrooms and an activity room. There is one elevator on the premises. The smoke detectors are interconnected and linked to the fire department. Food supplies are sufficient. There are no items obstructing the walkways. The facility is clean and free of odor. The hot water temperature was measured within 105-120 degrees F. The liability insurance is maintained at $1,000,000 per occurrence and $3,000,000 in total annual aggregate. LPA reviewed 6 resident files and their medications. Medications are given as prescribed by the physician. Resident files have a physician's report and reappraisal form, however, LPA issued a technical violation for not having them reassessed every 12 months or sooner. LPA reviewed 3 staff files. The administrator’s (Hyun Joo Watanabe) certificate expires on 11/18/27. Staff did not have current First Aid and/or CPR certificates. Facility did not have the updated Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610E) and did not document drills conducted. Deficiencies are issued on the LIC809D. An exit interview was held with the administrator. A copy of this report, along with appeal rights, was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2026

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

May 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elena Mallett conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to the facility to review the files of Staff #1-Staff #5 (S1-S5) . LPA met with Administrator Hyun Joo Watanabe (aka Jessica Shin) and the purpose of the visit was explained. Licensee Eugene Choi joined the visit at 10:30 AM. Upon review of the staff files LPA observed the following: S1 has been the Licensee/Executive Director since 2018 and has a criminal background clearance but is not associated to the facility. S2 has worked as a Housekeeper since 12/27/2021 and has a criminal background clearance but is not associated to the facility. S3 has worked as a Housekeeper at the facility since 03/07/2026 with no criminal background clearance and is not associated with the facility. S4 has worked as Kitchen staff at the facility since 03/04/2022 with no criminal background clearance and is not associated with the facility. S5 has worked as Kitchen staff at the facility since 03/17/2023 with no criminal background clearance and is not associated with the facility. . Per Title 22 a deficiency will be cited today , see 809-D, and Civil penalties will be assessed in the amount of $500 per staff member. The total civil penalty amount is $2,500.00. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Eugene Choi and Administrator Hyun Joo Watanabe (aka Jessica Shin) and a copy of this Licensing report was provided along with Appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 19, 2026

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review...(3) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) The above requirement was not met as evidenced by S1 and S2 were not assoicated to the facility in LIS or Guardian. The facility did not transfer S1 and S2 criminal record clearance. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to all residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026

Plan of correction: By POC due date, Administrator will submit a signed statement of understanding of the regulation cited and fax it to office Fax. S1 and S2 will not resume work at the facility until S1 and S2 are associated in Guardian.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 19, 2026

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review ...(2) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department The above requirement was not met as evidenced by S3,S4 and S5 were working at the facility and were not cleared and assoicated to the facility in Guardian. Facility did not obtain a criminal record clearance for S3,S4 and S5. This poses an immediate Health and safety risk to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026

Plan of correction: By POC due date Administrator will fax a signed statement of understanding of the cited regulation to LPA via the office Fax. S3, S4 and S5 will not resume work at the facility until facility obtains a criminal background clearance for S3, S4 and S5 and assoicates S3, S4 and S5 to the facility in Guardian.

May 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elena Mallett made an unannounced Case Management visit to facility to review staff files. LPA was met by Licensee Eugene Choi and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA requested and obtained goverment IDs from S1,S2,S3,S6,S7,S8,S9,S10. LPA requested and obtained job applications for S3,S4,S7,S9 and S10. Due to time constraints, visit will be continued on another day An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Eugene Choi and a copy of this Licensing Report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility only admits residents based on race.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Licensee Eugene and Administrator Jessica and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: On 2/22/24 LPA Alma Gonzalez conducted the initial 10-day visit and requested a copy of Staff and Resident rosters, LPA conducted a phone interview with Licensee Eugene Choin and an interview with Administrator Jessica Watanabe, and toured entire facility inside and out with Administrator. On 3/4/24 LPA Gonzalez conducted a subsequent visit to gather information pertaining to allegation and obtained copies of Staff and Resident Rosters. LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1-3 (S1-3) and Residents 1-5 (R1-5). LPA additionally requested copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. On 8/21/25 LPA Tena Herrera conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. (Continued on the LIC9099-C page) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility only admits residents based on race. It is alleged that the facility turned away individuals that were interested in moving in for not being Korean. LPA Gonzalez conducted 5 staff interviews in total, and each denied the above allegation, all 5 Staff stated that they have never discriminated against anyone for any reason, including race. Each staff confirmed they have been provided with non-discrimination training and have never observed another staff discriminating towards any of the residents or potential residents. All 5 staff additionally stated that there are other races besides Korean that live at the facility. LPA Gonzalez obtained a list of Non-Korean residents that have resided at facility from 2017-2023 (3 of which are still currently residing at facility). LPA Gonzalez interviewed 5 Residents and 5 out of 5 Residents denied the above allegation and stated that they have never felt discriminated against, interviews with R3 and R4 stated that there are individuals that are not of Korean descent that live at the facility. Interview with Licensee Eugene Choi explained that although the facility is known in the Korean community this is mainly because many of the facilities residents used to live in Koreatown and preferred to stay close to the neighborhood, a google search to see how far facility is from Koreatown it confirmed there is a 1.7 mile distance from facility location to Koreatown. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff/residents and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was emailed to mugunghwasilvertown@gmail.comthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025 · control 28-AS-20240216083741
May 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted the required annual inspection on 5/23/25. LPA met with licensee, Eugene Choi, and explained the purpose of the visit. The administrator, Jessica Watanabe, also assisted with the visit. The facility is licensed for 56 residents, of which 24 may be non-ambulatory. The non-ambulatory residents are approved for the 1st floor only. The facility is a two-story building. The first floor consists of the administrator’s office, resident bedrooms, dining area, kitchen, activity room, laundry room, and medication room. There is a covered outdoor area. The second floor consists of resident bedrooms and an activity room. There is one elevator on the premises. The smoke detectors are interconnected and linked to the fire department. Food supplies are sufficient and are purchased at least 4 times a week. There are no items obstructing the walkways. The facility appears clean and free of odor. The hot water temperature was measured within 105-120 degrees F. The facility could not provide proof of the liability insurance covering injuries in the amount of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $3,000,000 in total annual aggregate. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and their medications. The files have the required documents. Medications are centrally stored in the med room. LPA observed that the evening medications for Resident #1 were not given for approximately 8 days and Resident #3 was not given the Mirtazapine medication daily. LPA reviewed 4 staff files. The administrator’s (Hyun Joo Watanabe) certificate expires on 11/18/25. Staff #2 did not have a completed health screening on file. The administrator confirmed that staff did not receive training during the 2024 year. LPA provided a technical violation for not having emergency drills conducted at least quarterly for each shift. The deficiencies are issued on the LIC809D. An exit interview was held with the administrator. A copy of this report, along with appeal rights, was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(f) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 6, 2025

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (f) All personnel, including the licensee and administrator, shall be in good health, and physically and mentally capable of performing assigned tasks. Good physical health shall be verified by a health screening, including a chest x-ray or an intradermal test, performed by a physician not more than six (6) months prior to or seven (7) days after employment or licensure. A report shall be made of each screening, signed by the examining physician. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which staff #2 did not have a health screening done upon hire which posesd a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure all employees have a health screening performed by a physician on file and ensure that Staff #2 obtains a health screening by due date 6/6/25.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.605 · Plan of correction due date: May 30, 2025

On and after July 1, 2015, all residential care facilities for the elderly...shall maintain liability insurance covering injury to residents and guests in the amount of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and three million dollars ($3,000,000) in the total annual aggregate, caused by the negligent acts or omissions to act of, or neglect by, the licensee or its employees. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which the liability insurance was not available upon request which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure the liability insurance is maintained for the facility at all times. The proof of insurance with the required amount shall be submitted to LPA by 5/30/25.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC1569.625(b)(2 · Plan of correction due date: May 30, 2025

(2) In addition to paragraph (1), training requirements shall also include an additional 20 hours annually, eight hours of which shall be dementia care training, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626, and four hours of which shall be specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696. This training shall be administered on the job, or in a classroom setting, or both, and may include online training. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in staff were not given the annual 20 hours training which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure that the staff are receiving training during the year to fulfill the requirements. A statement acknowledging this regulation shall be submitted to LPA by 5/30/25.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 24, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 2 of the residents' medications were not given as ordered by the physician which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure the medications are being given as prescribed by the physician. An in-service training shall be given to all staff handling medications and submit the log to LPA by 5/24/25.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jul 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an annual inspection visit. LPA was allowed entry by Administrator Jessica Watanabe. LPA discussed the purpose of today’s visit. . The facility is licensed to serve (56) elderly residents of which 24 may be non-ambulatory. There are currently three (3) non-ambulatory residents in placement. All non-ambulatory residents are only on the 1st floor. The facility is a two story building which consists of the following: 12 resident rooms located on the first floor and 16 resident rooms located on the second floor. The 1st floor consist of the kitchen, dining room, activity room and medication room. The second floor consists of resident rooms and one resting room for residents. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: Facility does has an Infection Control Plan in place. Operational Requirements: Facility is adhering to the operational requirements. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPA toured facility grounds. The furniture in the dining room was adequate and the kitchen was clean. The appliances were working properly. The refrigerators and freezer are set at appropriate temperatures. LPA toured resident rooms which were randomly chosen for inspection on both floors. There are smoke detectors and fire extinguishers located throughout the building. The hallways and stairways are clear and free of any obstructions. Resident rooms were observed to be clean, properly furnished and have the required linen which were in good condition. There was adequate lighting throughout the facility. All resident rooms had appropriate storage for resident's personal belongings. The bathrooms have the required grab bars near the **Continued on LIC809C** toilet and in the shower. Showers also have non-skid materials. The hot water was tested and was between in random resident rooms and was between 105.2 - 110.4 degrees, which is within Title 22 regulations. Restrooms were observed to be clean, and operational. There is 1 elevator and the elevator was operating at the time of the visit. There is no pool or large bodies of water on the premises. A comfortable temperature was maintained throughout the facility. Staffing: Facility is adhering to staffing requirements. Personnel Records-Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed staff files for Facility Administrator and Staff 1-3 (S1-3). Staff have current First Aid/CPR certification. Staff have their Health Screening and Tuberculosis Screening on file. Resident Rights-Information: Resident rights are posted and included in Resident files. Planned Activities: Activity schedule is posted. Food Service: There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and (1) week of non-perishable items. The food is properly stored in the refrigerator. Posted menu observed. Pesticides and cleaning supplies are kept away from the food preparation areas. Kitchen is kept clean and free from rodents and other vermin. Plates, cups and utensils are kept cleaned and stored properly. Dining areas have adequate seating. Resident Records-Incident Reports: LPA reviewed Resident files for Resident 1-4 (R1-4). Resident files are maintained at the facility. Resident files have the required documents. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has a Disaster Preparedness plan in place. Residents with Special Health Needs: Per Administrator, there are no residents with postural supports and no residents with prohibited health conditions. Per Administrator, there are (0) residents utilizing oxygen equipment. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are stored/ locked inside the medication room and are inaccessible to residents. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Jessica Watanabe.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

Meals, preferences & familiar food

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County