Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Mountain Vista of Ojai

Mid-size home·Licensed for 38·Ojai, California

Licensed since 2004Licence #565801019
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,700 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,700–$6,150
  • Home sizeLicensed for 38Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit28 of 38 beds occupiedJuly 14, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJanuary 12, 2026CDSS inspection record

Mountain Vista of Ojai is a mid-size care home in Ojai — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 38 residents since 2004. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Mountain Vista of Ojai

Is Mountain Vista of Ojai licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Mountain Vista of Ojai licensed for?

38 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Mountain Vista of Ojai been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Mountain Vista of Ojai still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Mountain Vista of Ojai cost?

$4,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$6,150. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $6,202 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Mountain Vista of Ojai take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by California Retirement Homes Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Community Memorial Hospital - Ojai is 1.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Mountain Vista of Ojai keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Mountain Vista of Ojai license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MOUNTAIN VISTA OF OJAI”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565801019. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 38 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to California Retirement Homes Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 12, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 38 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 10 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 38 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER INCREASE FROM TWELVE (12) TO FIFTEEN (15) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,700a month to start

Likely $3,700–$6,150

From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,700a month

Likely $3,700–$6,300

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,700likely $3,700–$6,150

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$6,300
$4,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,250
$6,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

15 homes like this within 25 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$6,750.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 602 East Oak Street, Ojai, CA 93023Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2004. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 12, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
8
Most recent visit
January 12, 2026
Occupied · July 14, 2025 visit
28 of 38 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 29, 2024 to July 14, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints2typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2004.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252202024220202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 10:00 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA was greeted by Assistant Administrator Theresa Burdick and Administrator Nickie Perez and informed them of the reason for the visit. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. Facility records are stored in a locked office. The LPA observed documentation of Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last disaster drill (conducted on 11/12/2025). The LPA obtained Client Roster, Staff Roster, and Insurance Liability. The LPA reviewed five (5) of twenty-seven (27) resident files. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All resident records were in order. The LPA reviewed five (5) of twenty-two (22) staff files. Personnel records and Administrator’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All staff records were complete and current. Medications: A medication review was conducted for three out of five residents and the following was observed. The medications were stored in a medication room and med carts which are locked and inaccessible to the residents. Medications are properly documented on the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR). Interviews: The LPA conducted three (3) resident and three (3) staff interviews. No concerns were voiced. Report will continue on LIC809-C, 2nd page. The LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with Administrator Nickie Perez to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was noted: Facility is a residence that consists of two (2) buildings, with ten (10) resident rooms in each building. Building #2 is two stories and the second story is designated solely for staff. The LPA observed fire extinguishers throughout the facility, which were fully charged and last serviced 01/09/2026. All smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed all required postings throughout the facility. The facility serves residents with dementia, the auditory alarms on the exit doors were tested and functioned properly at the time of visit. Kitchen: During the facility tour, the kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional. The LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility. Food is prepared based on the menu. Snacks and beverages are available for residents. The LPA observed one of two kitchen refrigerators with the temperature of 49*F, upon observation the Administrator stated that the attached thermometer was not working properly and placed a second thermometer inside the fridge, however that thermometer was also showing temperature above 40*F. Bedrooms: During today’s visit, the LPA observed five (5) randomly selected resident units. The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with at least one chair, nightstand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed all bathrooms, properly supplied and had functional fixtures. The LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. Water temperature measured in the restrooms in both buildings ranged between 110.7 degrees Fahrenheit and 117.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the dining areas and living areas. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Cleaning supplies and toxins were observed locked and inaccessible. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors)/Garage: The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. The garage is detached and locked at all times. No bodies of water were observed. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide resident medication as prescribed. Facility staff handles residents in a rough manner. Facility staff do not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met. Facility staff are not assisting with soiled diapering in a timely manner. Facility staff are not communicating with the residents’ hospice agency/representative.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Nickie Perez and back-up Administrator Teresa Burdick and explained the reason for the visit. On 5/21/2025, LPA Erica Mosley conducted the initial complaint investigation visit. LPA Mosley conducted interviews with the licensee, administrator, staff, and witness, as well as collected pertinent documents. On 7/11/2025, LPA Camara attempted interviews with four witnesses via telephone. Two witnesses stated they had no information regarding these allegations. Messages were left for two other witnesses; however, they did not respond. During today’s visit 7/14/2025, starting at 9:50 a.m. LPA conducted interviews with the administrators and three witnesses. LPA conducted a review of medications for Resident 1 (R1) at 12:38 p.m. (continued on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC9099) Regarding the allegation “Facility staff did not provide resident medication as prescribed”: LPA reviewed medication records; it appeared medications were given to R1 as prescribed. The complaint alleged PRN medications were not given. LPA observed PRN medication was given as requested by hospice nurses. Staff stated on or about 5/15/2025, R1 was unable to self administer medications due to being so sedated from prior doses. The hospice nurse wanted R1 to receive another dose of a sedating medication but R1 was already too sedated and could not self administer. The hospice nurse somehow administered the new medication order. Based on interviews and records reviewed this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff handles residents in a rough manner”: LPAs interviewed staff and witnesses regarding this allegation. There were no witnesses to any residents being handled in a rough manner. Based on interviews this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegations “Facility staff do not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met” and “Facility staff are not assisting with soiled diapering in a timely manner:” LPAs interviewed staff and witnesses regarding these allegations. Bathing is provided on a schedule or more often as needed. Residents on hospice are bathed by hospice personnel on a schedule and hygiene is provided as needed by facility staff. Residents’ incontinence care needs are checked every one to two hours or more often as needed. Witnesses who were interviewed stated they did not have any concerns about hygiene and incontinence care provided by the facility staff. Based on interviews these allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are not communicating with the residents’ hospice agency representative”: LPA’s interviewed staff and witnesses and reviewed documents. Based on documentation received by CCL, whenever there is a reportable incident involving residents at the facility who are on hospice, the hospice agency is also notified. Based on interviews with staff and witnesses, the facility communicates with hospice and family members when a resident on hospice has any issues that must be addressed. Based on interviews and records reviewed, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250520150238
Feb 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a required annual inspection. LPA met with administrator Nickie Perez and explained the reason for the visit. At 2:00 p.m., LPA along with the administrator, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. KITCHEN: LPA inspected the main kitchen/food service area in building two. Kitchen appliances were clean and appeared in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food and water. Refrigerator and dry food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates and food labels had expiration dates clearly marked. Knives and sharps were observed locked and inaccessible in the kitchen; the kitchen door remains locked. LPA inspected the locked kitchen in building one where drinks and snacks are kept. The kitchen was clean and appliances appeared functional. COMMON AREAS: The gathering rooms and dining rooms had appropriate furnishings that were in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. At 2:45 p.m. the smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operational at the time of the visit. The fire extinguishers were observed to be in compliance and last charged on 4/4/2024. LPA observed required postings throughout the common space. There is a working telephone on premises. Auditory alarms, call buttons and pendants were functioning at the time of the visit. LPA observed cameras in common areas. (Continued on LIC 809C) Continued from LIC809 GARAGE: The garage is locked and detached. Most of the facilities food supplies, PPE, and personal care supplies are stored in the garage. LAUNDRY ROOM: There is a washer and dryer in each building in a locked room. The staff assist residents with all laundry needs. Detergents and cleaning supplies were locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care. COURTYARD: The yard has a covered outdoor area with furniture for residents use. Emergency exits and passageways were observed free of obstruction. The facility has one (1) side gate that is delayed egress. The gate opened automatically when the fire system was tested as designed. No bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. BEDROOMS: LPA inspected 10 resident bedrooms. All were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. RESTROOMS: LPA inspected restrooms and shower rooms. All were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with soap and paper products. LPA will return at a later date to review records and medications. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect Staff not providing adequate food service Facility not providing a comfortable temperature for resident Staff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time Staff do not offer resident opportunity to exercise Staff failed to provide proper hygiene to resident Staff failed to elevate resident's feet

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint visit at the facility. LPA met with administrator Nickie Perez and explained the reason for the visit. During LPA's visit on 1/12/2023, LPA interviewed staff and other witnesses, conducted a facility tour, inspected the food supply, observed residents eating lunch, reviewed surveillance video of incidents involving resident #1 (R1), obtained pertinent documents, and met with R1's family, Adult Protective Services Social Worker, and Ventura County Sheriff's Department deputies. On 7/29/2024, LPA conducted interviews with visitors, resident, and observed residents eating lunch. Based on interviews with witnesses and residents, staff treat all residents with respect and kindness. There were no concerns voiced regarding how staff treat the residents, therefore the allegation staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. (continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC9099) Based on interviews with witnesses and residents, the food at the facility is good and the serving sizes are large. The facility cook will ask "picky eaters" what they like to eat to try and accommodate them. LPA observed the food supply was abundant, with more than enough perishable and nonperishable foods. Therefore, the allegation staff was not providing adequate food service is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and residents as well as LPA's observations, the facility is kept at a comfortable temperature. Some residents may feel cold even if the facility temperature is at 78*F. They keep sweaters/jackets and blankets in case a resident feels chilly. Therefore, the allegation the facility is not providing a comfortable temperature for residents is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and residents, facility staff provide assistance with incontinence care. Staff respond to call buttons for assistance quickly, never more than 15 minutes wait time. Staff also assist with showers on a schedule or as needed. None of the witnesses had ever come into the facility and observed residents disheveled, needing incontinence care for a long period of time or smelling badly. Therefore, the allegations staff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time and staff failed to provide proper hygiene to resident are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and residents, facility staff will assist residents with mobility issues. They do not perform physical therapy (PT) on residents as this is not a rehabilitation facility with PT professionals, but they do assist residents with walking if the resident is physically capable of safely using a walker. Facility staff also offer chair exercise activites to the residents. Therefore, the allegation staff do not offer resident opportunity to exercise is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and residents, facility staff assist residents with circulation issues. Staff assist residents with elevating their feet while sitting in chairs, wheelchairs, or in bed throughtout the day. Therefore, the allegation staff failed to elevate resident's feet is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies were observed. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230104090949
Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 09:15 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA was greeted by staff and informed them of the reason for the visit. Administrator Nickie Perez arrived shortly after. At 09:38 a.m. the LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with Administrator Nickie Perez to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was noted: Facility is a residence that consists of two (2) buildings, with ten (10) resident rooms in each building. Building #2 is two stories and the second story is designated solely for staff. The LPA observed fire extinguishers throughout the facility, which were fully charged and last serviced 03/17/2023. At 12:05 p.m. all smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed all required postings throughout the facility. The facility serves residents with dementia, the auditory alarms on the exit doors were tested and functioned properly at the time of visit. Kitchen: During the facility tour, the kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional. The LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility. Food is prepared based on the menu. Snacks and beverages are available for residents. Bedrooms: During today’s visit, the LPA observed ten (10) randomly selected resident units. The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with at least one chair, nightstand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed all bathrooms, properly supplied and had functional fixtures. The LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. Water temperature measured in the restrooms in both buildings ranged between 108.6 degrees Fahrenheit and 118.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Report will continue on LIC809-C. Common Areas: These included the dining areas and living areas. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Cleaning supplies and toxins were observed locked and inaccessible. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors)/Garage: The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. The garage is detached and locked at all times. No bodies of water were observed. Infection Control: The community's policies and procedures pertaining to infection control were adequate. Record Review: At 11:38 a.m. a review of facility files was initiated. Facility records are stored in a locked office. The LPA observed documentation of Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill (conducted on 10/09/2023). The LPA obtained Client Roster, Staff Roster, and Insurance Liability. The LPA reviewed five (5) of twenty-three (23) resident files. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. The LPA identified that all five residents were missing the Consent for Emergency medical treatment form, (LIC 627C). Otherwise, all resident records were in order. The LPA reviewed five (5) of twenty-two (22) staff files. Personnel records and Administrator’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. The LPA identified that three (3) of five (5) staff did not have a total of 20 hours of the annual required training which includes 8 hours of dementia training, and 4 hours which shall be specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care. Interviews: During today’s visit, the LPA conducted six (6) resident interviews and four (4) staff interviews. No concerns voiced during the interviews. Medications: At approximately 3:45 p.m. a medications review was initiated for two out of five residents and the following was observed. The medications were stored in a medication room and med carts which are locked and inaccessible to the residents. During Resident #2 (R#2's) audit, the LPA observed four (4) extra Metoclopramide 5 MG tablets, and two (2) extra Mirtazapine 15 MG ½ tabs based on start dates, and medication quantities documentation on the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR). No change in orders were observed, and no refusals, or other reasons for medicine not being taken were observed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) by the LPA and Administrator Teresa. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room typesPrivate · Semi-Private

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Pet types allowedDogs · Cats

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Ventura County