Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Haave House

Small home·Licensed for 6·Oak View, California

Licensed since 2005Licence #565801311
  • Care approvals on fileHospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,150 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedApril 30, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitDecember 3, 2025CDSS inspection record

Haave House is a small care home in Oak View — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2005. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care and dementia care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Haave House

Is Haave House licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Haave House licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Haave House been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Haave House still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Haave House cost?

$5,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,200–$6,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $6,202 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Haave House take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Haave House, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Community Memorial Hospital - Ojai is 3.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Haave House keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Haave House license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “HAAVE HOUSE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565801311. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Haave House, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 3, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR (4) RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,150a month to start

Likely $4,200–$6,350

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,150a month

Likely $4,200–$6,500

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,150likely $4,200–$6,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,200–$6,500
$5,150
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,900–$9,600
$7,150
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

19 homes like this within 25 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$7,100.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 19 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 315 Riverside Road, Oak View, CA 93022Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2005. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 3, 2025.

On file since
2022
State visits
6
Most recent visit
December 3, 2025
Occupied · April 30, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 4, 2023 to April 30, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2005.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025220202411020232202022110

The last 36 months — 4 of 6 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 12:30 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA was greeted by staff and informed them of the reason for the visit. At approximately 12:50 p.m. Licensee Bonnie Haave arrived and was informed of the reason for the visit. At 01:00 p.m. the LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with the Licensee to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was noted: Facility is a single-story residence that consists of six (6) resident bedrooms, one (1) live-in staff room, and two (2) restrooms. The LPA observed one (1) fire extinguishers which was fully charged and last serviced 03/17/2025. All smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed all required postings in the hallway near the kitchen. The facility serves residents with dementia, the auditory alarms on the exit doors were tested and functioned properly at the time of visit. Kitchen: During the facility tour. the kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional. LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility. Sharps are stored in a locked drawer. Bedrooms: The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with at least one chair, nightstand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed all bathrooms, properly supplied and had functional fixtures. The LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. Water temperature in resident’s restroom was measured at 105 degrees Fahrenheit. Report will continue on LIC809-C. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. There is a fireplace in the living room, which is covered with a screen. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Cleaning supplies and disinfectants are kept in a locked closet in the hallway between the kitchen and bedrooms along with the washer and dryer. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Interviews: The LPA conducted one (1) resident interview. No concerns were voiced. Record Review: At 01:15 p.m. a review of facility files was initiated. The LPA reviewed five (5) out of six (6) resident files. The following was observed: Resident 1 did not have a Consent for Emergency Medical Treatment on file or their Admission Agreement on file. Upon observation the Licensee stated that they believe R1's family member has the admission agreement and would request it. Resident 2-5 did not have an updated Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (LIC625) on file, all their LIC 625 were from 2023. At approximately 3:15 p.m. the Licensee had to leave and designated staff Maria Dye to review and sign the report. Due to time constraints the LPA will return at a later date to complete the annual. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report and appeal rights provided,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2025
Apr 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents Staff left resident in soiled diapers for extended periods of time Staff are not responding to residents' call buttons in a timely manner Staff made inappropriate comment towards resident Staff are not communicating with resident's authorized repsresntative regarding resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit. LPA met with administrator Bonnie Haave and explained the reason for the visit. On 9/11/2025, LPA interviewed a resident, witness, and administrator. LPA conducted a facility tour and inspected the food supply. LPA reviewed and obtained pertinent documents. On 4/29/2025, LPA interviewed another witness over the phone. During today's visit on 4/30/2025, LPA interviewed a witness at 11:14 a.m., staff at 11:04 a.m., and the administrator at 10:00 a.m. LPA reviewed and obtained pertinent documents at 10:30 a.m. (continued on 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC9099; page 1) Regarding the allegation staff are not providing adequate food service to residents: LPA observed a sufficient food supply. LPA asked residents about food service and they responded "good" and "it's delicious". The administrator showed LPA slips of paper Resident 1 (R1) would write their requests for what they wished to be served and staff would accommodate R1's requests. LPA interviewed witnesses who stated staff were very accommodating to R1's wishes, although R1 frequently complained about what they were served, even though it was what R1 requested. Based on interviews and the food supply inspection, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation staff left resident in soiled diapers for extended periods of time: LPA interviewed witnesses who observed and provided care to R1. They stated they had not observed R1 with soiled diapers when they visited R1. In addition, they had not observed any skin breakdown which would be indicative of being left in soiled diapers. Based on these interviews, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation staff are not responding to residents' call buttons in a timely manner: LPA interviewed a resident who stated they would hear R1 ring their bell/call button and staff would respond right away. Witnesses stated they observed the same. Staff stated when R1 rang they checked on R1 right away. They would also check on R1 regularly without the bell but if R1 didn't ring, or accidentally rang, R1 would get irritated with them and yell and sometimes strike staff. Based on these interviews, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. (continued on LIC9099-C; page 3) (continued from LIC9099; page 2) Regarding the allegation staff made inappropriate comment towards resident: LPA interviewed a resident and witnesses about how staff communicated with R1. The resident and witnesses stated staff were always kind and respectful to R1, even when R1 was yelling at them. Staff stated they were kind and patient to R1. If R1 was being too aggressive toward them they would leave her alone to let her calm down as she would threaten to strike them with the TV remote or possibly a flashlight. These threats would be due to staff coming into R1's room to check on them without R1 pressing the call button. Staff regularly check on residents to see if they need assistance with incontinence care or if the want a snack or something to drink. Based on this information, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation staff are not communicating with resident's authorized representative regarding R1: LPA reviewed text messages sent to the administrator regarding R1 from R1's family. Many of the text messages were sent to the administrator after her normal business hours. The administrator informed the family of her normal business hours of 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Most of the text messages were sent outside of those hours and were non emergent. The text messages were responded to later or they were followed up with a phone call. Based on this information, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiencies observed. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240906101058
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 8:30am on 12/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator, Bonnie Haave, announced who he is and the reason for the visit. This facility has 7 bedroom, 6 of the rooms are single resident occupancy, and the 7th bedroom is a live-in staff bedroom. Facility bedrooms were properly equipped per regulations including additional linins. There are two bathrooms that are shared bathrooms. Bathrooms were stocked with liquid soap and paper towels. The main entrances is in the front of the facility and there is a side entrance. There are two hallways in the facility, one adjacent to the main entrance and one that leads from the living room, medications are stored and locked in a cabinet in the facility hallway leading from the living room. There are tables with umbrellas in the back of the facility and there is a covered side porch with seating for activities and visitors for residents and visitor. There a is a living room, dining room and kitchen at the front of the facility. LPA observed at least 2 days of perishable foods and at least 7 days of non perishable foods for 6 residents and staff. LPA noted that there is a fire extinguisher mounted in the kitchen area that is primed in the green. LPA noted that there are functioning smoke detectors in each resident room. LPA noted that there is a working carbon monoxide detector located in the facility hallway next to the air vent. LPA observed required facility posting in the facility hallway near the main entrance. LPA conducted a sample medication audit, reviewed staff, and resident files. LPA reviewed Emergency Disaster (LIC610) and Infection Control Plans (LIC9282) with Administrator and singed for annual review. LPA and Administrator conducted a full review of the annual control tools modules. LPA noted that there were no citations or violations issued as a result of the facilities annual physical inspection and the annual control tools modules. LPA conducted 2 staff and 4 client interviews. Exit interview, report read and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 1, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 09:05 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA was greeted by Licensee Bonnie Haave and informed them of the reason for the visit. Record Review: At 09:15 a.m. a review of facility files was initiated. The LPA reviewed five (5) out of six (6) resident files. The LPA reviewed five (5) out of five (5) staff files. The LPA observed documentation of Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill (conducted on 10/10/2023). The LPA obtained a Client Roster and Staff Roster. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Interviews: At 12:30 p.m. the LPA conducted two (2) staff and two (2) resident Interviews. No immediate concerns were voiced. Medications: At 1:00 p.m. a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a hallway closet; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record, however, start dates for several medications of all residents were not documented. A conversation was held between the LPA and Licensee Bonnie of the importance of best practice in writing a start date for all medications. Licensee Bonnie stated that moving forward, the start date for all medications will be documented. At 02:40 p.m. the LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with Licensee Bonnie Haave to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was noted: Facility is a single-story residence that consists of six (6) resident bedrooms, one (1) staff room, and two (2) restrooms. The LPA observed one (1) fire extinguishers which was fully charged and last serviced 01/02/2023. All smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed all required postings in the hallway near the kitchen. The facility serves residents with dementia, the auditory alarms on the exit doors were tested and functioned properly at the time of visit. Report will continue on LIC809-C. Kitchen: During the facility tour at 02:40 p.m. the kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional. LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility. Sharps are stored in a locked drawer. At 2:42 p.m. the LPA observed a steak knife unattended in the kitchen accessible to residents in care. Upon observation, staff locked the knife away. Bedrooms: The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with at least one chair, nightstand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. At 2:44 p.m. the LPA observed staff room unlocked with medication accessible to residents in care. Upon observation, staff locked the staff room. Bathrooms: The LPA observed all bathrooms, properly supplied and had functional fixtures. The LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. At 2:53 p.m. water temperature in resident’s restroom was measured at 106.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water measured was within the required limit of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. There is a fireplace in the living room, which is covered with a screen. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Cleaning supplies and disinfectants are kept in a locked closet in the hallway between the kitchen and bedrooms along with the washer and dryer. The garage: The LPA observed the garage, where the emergency food and water is stored. The garage is locked. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Infection Control: The home has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and can obtain additional supplies. The home’s policies and procedures pertaining to infection control were adequate. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report and appeal rights provided to Licensee Bonnie Haave.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  4. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Ventura County