Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,000 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 19, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitAugust 19, 2026CDSS inspection record
Mercy Home 3 is a small care home in Winchester — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2017.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Mercy Home 3
Is Mercy Home 3 licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Mercy Home 3 licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Mercy Home 3 been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Mercy Home 3 still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Mercy Home 3 cost?
$5,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,100–$6,150. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 161 other homes of a similar licensed size across Riverside County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 161 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Mercy Home 3 take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Ajunwa, Mercillina, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Murrieta is 4.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Mercy Home 3 keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Mercy Home 3 license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “MERCY HOME 3”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #331800087. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Ajunwa, Mercillina, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,000a month to start
Likely $4,100–$6,150
From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,000a month
Likely $4,100–$6,300
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $4,100–$6,150
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,100–$6,300
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$9,400
- $7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
14 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,250–$5,000.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate
- New Hope Residential Elder Care IIIWinchester · 0.7 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Home AthenaWinchester · 0.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Home TavelWinchester · 1.3 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Concord Estates Assisted LivingMurrieta · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Home Bachelor PeakWinchester · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Senior Haven of MurrietaMurrieta · 2.4 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Murrieta Manor: Senior LivingMurrieta · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Tlc Care HomeMurrieta · 3.1 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ailida Retirement HomeMurrieta · 3.3 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A & A Family Care for the ElderlyMurrieta · 3.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Agate ManorMenifee · 4.5 mi · Small home$5,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- We R EvergreenMenifee · 4.6 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sarah's Best LifeMurrieta · 4.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aloha Home CareMurrieta · 4.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 36427 Pistachio Drive, Winchester, CA 92596Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2017. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 19, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 10
- Most recent visit
- August 19, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 7, 2021 to August 19, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (4). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints3typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents
Aug 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is allowed to have visitors at the facility.
On 8/19/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence the complaint investigation and deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa. The investigation consisted of record reviews, interviews with the reporting party and staff as well as observation. Allegation: Staff does not ensure resident is allowed to have visitors at the facility. LPA did not find evidence showing facility staff restricted or prevented visitation. Interviews confirm visitation challenges were due to family disagreements and not facility action. Staff allowed RP to visit R1 during the investigation without issue. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the allegations mentioned above is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099 was discussed and provided to Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260615082319
Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection LPA met with Administrator Mercilina Ajunwaand was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (5). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Mercilina Ajunwaand, to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents . Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (3) resident file for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also verified (3) resident's medications, along with (3) Hospice files. LPA also reviewed (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screening. During record review, LPA Rico observed (2) staff had an expire CPR/1st aid Certificate and observed the facility last emergency drill was conducted on March 20,2025. Futhermore, LPA recommoned Licensee to organize and label residents Pre-admission assessment and Reappraisals/Care Plan. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, (2) deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. Along with two technical violations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) (LIC809D)Appeal Rights was discussed and provided to Administrator Mercilina Ajunwaand.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026
Feb 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 02/25/2025 at 02:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct the required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Brown met with a staff and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were one (1) staff present, and four (4) residents present. Licensee/Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa was contacted and informed of the visit. Licensee/Administrator Ajunwa arrived during the visit. LPA Brown explained the purpose of the visit to Licensee/Administrator Ajunwa. The facility has 6 bedrooms, in which five (5) bedrooms are designated for residents, and one (1) bedroom's designated for staff, 3 and 1/2 bathrooms, living room, kitchen, dining area, backyard, laundry room and attached garage. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) resident may be bedridden. The current census is four (4) residents. The facility has approved hospice waiver for four (4) residents. LPA Brown was accompanied by Staff #2 (S2) to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). The buildings and grounds were free from hazards. Outdoor and indoor passageways were kept free of obstruction. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Brown inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA Brown observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Brown measured and observed the water temperature in the residents/staffs shared bathroom to be at 105.2 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Postings such as the facility license, personal rights, the CCLD complaint poster, ombudsman poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications are kept inside the medication closet ***Continuation in LIC809C*** near the kitchen inaccessible to residents. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Seven (7) days non-perishable and two (2) days perishable food supply observed at the facility. LPA observed the facility have emergency supplies, food and water. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and a night staff, awake and on duty at night for facility with dementia residents. Record Review: The facility has updated Liability Insurance and Infection Control Plan maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed four (4) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals, centrally stored medications list, needs and services plans. LPA Brown observed that Resident #2 (R2) Admission Agreement does not have the Licensee/Facility Representative Signature and no signature date. Deficiency will be issued. LPA reviewed three (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings with tuberculosis (TB) test results. LPA observed Staff #2 (S2) working at the facility with criminal background clearance but S2's criminal background clearance was not transferred to the facility prior to employment on 11/2024. Deficiency will be issued and civil penalty of $500.00 will be assessed today, and will continue to be assessed of $100.00/day until corrected. Medications/MARs records were audited for two (2) residents and appeared to be dispensed and logged appropriately. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), LIC809D, LIC421BG and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025
Feb 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist resident out of bed. Staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed. The facility does not provide adequate meals to meet residents needs. Staff scolded resident. Staffs do not allow resident to wear their own clothes.
On 02/13/2025 at 04:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entrance to the facility by Licensee/Administrator Mercilina Ajunwa. LPA Brown explained the purpose of today's visit to Licensee/Administrator Ajunwa. The investigation was conducted by LPA Brown. The investigation consisted of file review, observations and interviews with relevant parties. The first allegation indicates staff do not assist resident out of bed. During the investigation, LPA Brown did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that staffs at the facility are assisting them out of bed. Two (2) of two (2) staffs interviewed reported that they are assisting their residents out of their bed. Interviews with two (2) of two (2) staffs revealed that Resident #1 (R1)'s two (2) persons assist and they are always assisting R1 out of bed. ***Continuation in LIC9099C*** Unsubstantiated R1 Hospice Care Nurse Director shared that the hospice care team did not report any incident that the staffs at the facility are not assisting R1 out of bed. In addition, R1 Hospice Care Nurse Director reported that the hospice care team did not report any neglect by a staff at the facility to R1 or other residents. Also, R1 Hospice Care Nurse Director indicated that R1 skin's dry, fragile, and R1 does not have enough nutrition which makes R1 high risk and prone for skin breakdown at any time and not from poor care of the staffs at the facility. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown observed staff assisting their residents out of bed. The second allegation indicates that staffs do not administer medications as prescribed. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that staffs are giving their medications daily and administering their medications as prescribed by their physician. Two (2) of two (2) staffs interviewed reported that they are giving their residents medications per their doctor's order. Staff #1 (S1) reported to LPA Brown that there's no incident that happened at the facility that they placed two (2) medication patches on R1 and R1's family member cancelled the prescription. Interview with Hospice Care Nurse Director indicated that the hospice care team did not report staffs at the facility are not administering R1's medication as prescribed. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown noted that staffs at the facility are utilizing Medication Administration Record (MAR) to ensure that they are administering their residents medications as prescribed by their doctor. Moreover, LPA Brown audited two (2) residents medications on 12/03/2024 and observed that staffs at the facility are administering their residents medications as prescribed by their doctors. The third allegation indicates that the facility does not provide adequate meals to meet residents needs. During the investigation, LPA Brown did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that the facility's providing them adequate meals to meet their needs and they can get second serving of food if they prefer. Two (2) of two (2) staffs interviewed reported that they are serving their residents adequate meals everyday and there's no incident that they did not provide adequate meals to their residents and they did not meet their needs. Two (2) staffs interviewed shared that they are providing adequate meals for R1. Hospice Care Nurse Director informed LPA Brown that the hospice care team did not report an incident that the facility's not providing adequate meals to R1 and not meeting R1's needs. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown observed that the facility's serving adequate and nutritious meals to their residents to meet their needs. The fourth allegation indicates that staff scolded resident. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated ***Continuation in LIC9099C*** that there's no incident at the facility that a staff scolded and yelled at them. Two (2) of two (2) staffs interview reported that they never scolded R1 or their residents and they did not yell at R1 or their residents. Hospice Care Nurse Director stated that the hospice care team did not report an incident at the facility that a staff scolded or yelled at R1 or their other residents. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown observed that staffs at the facility are providing care and supervision to their residents and they are not scolding or yelling at their residents. The fifth allegation indicates staff do not allow resident to wear their own clothes. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that they are wearing their own clothing that they prefer to wear and there's no incident at the facility that a staff did not allow them to wear their own clothes. Two (2) of two staff interviewed reported that their residents are wearing their own clothing. Interviews with two (2) of two (2) staffs revealed that they never restricted R1 or their residents to wear their own clothing. Hospice Care Director reported that the hospice care team did not report any incident that staffs at the facility are not allowing R1 or their residents to wear their own clothing. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown observed that residents at the facility are wearing their own clothes and staffs at the facility did not prohibit them from wearing their own clothes. Based on interviews and records review, the allegation that Staff do not assist resident out of bed (Allegation #1), Staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed (Allegation #2), The facility does not provide adequate meals to meet residents needs (Allegation #3), Staff scolded resident (Allegation #4), Staffs do allow resident to wear their own clothes (Allegation #5) are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, where this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Mercilina Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240206100424
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident.
On 12/17/2024 at 01:40 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entrance to the facility by a staff. Licensee/Administrator Mercelina Ajunwa was contacted and arrived during the visit and met with LPA Brown. LPA Brown explained the purpose of today's visit to Licensee/Administrator Ajunwa. The investigation was conducted by LPA Brown. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The first allegation indicates staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. During the investigation, LPA Brown did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interview with three (3) of three (3) staff indicated that they all seek timely medical attention for their residents if needed. Three (3) of three (3) staff indicated that on 07/13/2024, no incident happened to Resident #1 (R1) that R1 needs timely medical attention. Staff #1 (S1) informed LPA Brown that S1's Licensed ***Continuation in LIC9099C*** Unsubstantiated Professional and S1 reported to LPA Brown that S1 assessed R1 on 07/13/2024 after S1 observed R1's blinking R1's eyes for two (2) or three (3) seconds but it did not continue. S1 indicated that S1 did not observed any changes on R1 that will require immediate medical attention. Interviews with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that staffs at the facility are seeking timely medication for them. LPA Brown unable to interview three (3) residents at the facility as one (1) resident is not oriented, one (1) resident with family, and one (1) resident was sleeping. The second allegation indicates staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident. Interview with three (3) of three (3) staff indicated that they are properly reporting all incidents involving a resident at the facility to their family, physician and Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). S1 reported to LPA Brown that there's no incident that happened to R1 on 07/13/2024 that needs to be reported as no changes was observed to R1. S1 added that after R1's family visit on 07/13/2024, that same day, as a courtesy, S1 called R1's family/Power of Attorney(POA) and Fiduciary and S1 provided updates on R1's family visit to R1. R1 Family member/POA reported to LPA Brown that they are in close contact with S1 and all issues involving R1 were properly reported to them. Interviews with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that staffs at the facility are reporting all incidents that are happening at the facility to their family. LPA Brown unable to interview three (3) residents at the facility as one (1) resident is not oriented, one (1) resident with family, and one (1) resident was sleeping. Based on interviews and records review, the allegations staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident (Allegation #1) and staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident (Allegation #2) are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, where this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Mercelina Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240715160448
Jul 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 07/22/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a case management visit. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entrance by a staff. LPA Brown identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Nicole Ajunwa. At the time of the visit, there were six (6) residents, and two (2) staffs present. During today's visit, LPA Brown observed that Resident #3 (R3) has full bed rail and staff interview and records review indicated that R3's not on hospice and no exception report was submitted and approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Adult and Senior Care (ASC) Regional Office. Deficiency will be issued. Moreover, during the tour of the facility, LPA Brown observed Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #4 (R4), with half bed rails but staff interviews and document review indicated that there are no written order from their physician indicating the need for half bed rail for mobility. Deficiency will be issued. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC809), LIC809D and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to NIcole Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87608(a)(5)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 23, 2024
87608 Postural Supports (a) Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal, and subsequent changes to that appraisal, the facility shall provide assistance and care for the resident in those activities of daily living which the resident is unable to do...(5) Under no circumstances shall postural supports include tying, depriving, or limiting the use of a resident's hands or feet. (B) Bed rails that extend the entire length of the bed are prohibited except for residents who are currently receiving hospice care and have a hospice care plan that specifies the need for full bed rails. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having a full bed rail for Resident #3 (R3) and R3's not on hospice and no exception was submitted and approved to CCLD which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee stated to remove R3's full bed rail and submit proof to LPA Brown on Plan of Correction (POC) due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87608(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 5, 2024
87608 Postural Supports (a) Based on the individuals preadmission appraisal....(3) A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the residents record. The licensing agency... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #4 (R4), with half bed rails with no written order from their physician indicating the need for the postural support for mobility which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risks to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024
Plan of correction: The Licensee stated to submit written order from R2 and R4 physician indicating the need for the postural support for mobility and submit proof to LPA Brown on plan of correction (POC) due date.
Jan 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Caregiver Margaret Muchangi and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) resident may be bedridden. The current census is five (5) residents. LPA was accompanied by Caregiver to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to interior and exterior passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility has three (3) residents (R2, R4, and R5) in care with a condition that requires auditory alarms on exterior exits. The facility does not have auditory alarms on the main entry door, the exterior sliding door leading into the backyard, and the exterior door in Resident R1’s bedroom. The facility will be issued a deficiency for not having auditory alarms on the facility exit doors. LPA measured and observed the water temperature in the bathrooms to be at 105 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Postings such as the facility license, personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident and staff files. Medications are kept inside the hallway cabinet inaccessible to residents. Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for the residents in care. Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. LPA reviewed five (5) residents files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed two (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certifications, criminal record clearances, trainings, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), LIC809D, and LIC811 were discussed and provided to Caregiver Margaret Muchangi, along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Grateful Hearts Senior Living
Winchester · Small home · 0.1 mi away
$5,700 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Mercy Home
Winchester · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate
New Hope Residential Elder Care III
Winchester · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$4,200 a month to start · Listed by the home
Grace Home Athena
Winchester · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$5,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Generous Homecare
Winchester · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,850 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Generous Homecare
Winchester · Small home · 1.1 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate