Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Kayla's Board & Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Anaheim Hills, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #306006311
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,850–$7,300
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 3, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 3, 2026CDSS inspection record

Kayla's Board & Care is a small care home in Anaheim Hills — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Kayla's Board & Care

Is Kayla's Board & Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Kayla's Board & Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Kayla's Board & Care been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Kayla's Board & Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Kayla's Board & Care cost?

$5,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,850–$7,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 22 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 188 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 188 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Kayla's Board & Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Elvie B. Ringor, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Orange County - Anaheim is 4.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Kayla's Board & Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Kayla's Board & Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “KAYLA'S BOARD & CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306006311. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Elvie B. Ringor, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 6 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,900a month to start

Likely $4,850–$7,300

From 22 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,900a month

Likely $4,850–$7,450

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,900likely $4,850–$7,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 22 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,850–$7,450
$5,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,600–$10,450
$7,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 22 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

22 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$7,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 22 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6593 E Calle Del Norte, Anaheim Hills, CA 92807Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2023. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 3, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2023
State visits
12
Most recent visit
July 3, 2026
Occupied at that visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 28, 2023 to July 3, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints6typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202511020243302023450

The last 36 months — 9 of 11 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not qualified to provide medications to residents. Staff are not providing resident nutritious meal options. Staff are not properly storing food. Staff are not background cleared. Staff do not ensure facility is free of pests.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility regarding the above-mentioned allegations. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by Licensee Elvie Ringor, who granted entry into the facility. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The Department received a complaint on 06/30/2026 alleging that “Staff are not qualified to provide medications to residents,” “Staff are not providing resident nutritious meal options,” “Staff are not properly storing food,” “Staff are not background cleared,” and “Staff do not ensure facility is free of pests.” During the investigation, LPA interviewed three staff members. LPA also attempted to interview all five residents in care; however, LPA was unable to obtain reliable statements due to the residents’ cognitive abilities. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility and reviewed facility training records, Medication Administration Records (MARs), the facility food menu, and staff criminal record clearance information through Guardian. {***CONTINUE9099C***} Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegations that “Staff are not qualified to provide medications to residents” and “Staff are not background cleared,” it was alleged that staff were administering medications without proper training and that some staff were not properly cleared. During the investigation, three out of three staff interviewed denied the allegations. LPA reviewed staff training records and observed that staff have Basic Medication training certificates dated January 15, 2026. LPA also reviewed staff criminal record clearance information through Guardian and confirmed that all facility employees are fingerprinted and cleared. Regarding the allegations that “Staff are not providing resident nutritious meal options,” “Staff are not properly storing food,” and “Staff do not ensure facility is free of pests,” it was alleged that residents were primarily provided canned and processed foods, food was being stored in the garage despite high temperatures, and there was a cockroach infestation, particularly in the kitchen where resident meals are prepared. During the investigation, three out of three staff interviewed denied the allegations. LPA attempted to interview all five residents in care; however, reliable statements could not be obtained due to the residents’ cognitive abilities. LPA reviewed the facility food menu and observed that the menu included a variety of nutritionally based food options. LPA also reviewed staff training records, which showed that staff completed certified training in the principles of good nutrition, food preparation, and food storage on February 5, 2026. In addition, LPA conducted an interior and exterior walk-through of the facility, including resident bedrooms, restrooms, the kitchen, living room, and garage. LPA did not observe insects, bugs, cockroaches, or any evidence of pest infestation during the visit. Based on interviews, attempted resident interviews, record review, LPA observation, and information obtained during the investigation, the above allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Elvie Ringor, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260630114736
Jun 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of completing the annual required inspection. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted and granted entry by Office Manager, Rommel Ringor LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility and observed the following: The facility is a single-level structure licensed to serve six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (1) may be bedridden. The facility also has a hospice waiver for six (6) residents. The home consists of four (4) resident bedrooms, one (1) staff bedroom, three (3) bathrooms, a living room area, dining room area, kitchen, outdoor shaded seating area, and an attached two-car garage. LPA and AD tested the smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors in the common areas and resident bedrooms, and all were observed to be operational. Residents’ bedrooms contained the required furniture, bed linens, and adequate closet and drawer space to accommodate residents comfortably. LPA observed fire extinguishers mounted in the kitchen and garage areas. The last inspection date for the fire extinguishers was December 18, 2025. Upon review of records, the emergency drill log indicated the most recent drill was conducted on May 13, 2025. LPA observed that sharps and knives were locked in the kitchen and inaccessible to residents in care. Restroom toilets and water faucets were operational. Grab bars were secure, and showers were observed to be free of mold and mildew. The hot water temperature was measured between 109.1 degrees Fahrenheit and 109.6 degrees Fahrenheit. {CONTINUE 809} LPA and AD toured the backyard and observed a shaded seating area available for residents’ use. LPA confirmed that emergency exits were free of obstructions. LPA reviewed two (2) resident files and two (2) staff files and observed that the files contained the required documentation. Based on observations and record review conducted during today’s inspection, no deficiencies were cited pursuant to Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jun 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On June 11, 2025, at 8:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eboni Bentley conducted an unannounced required 1-Year annual visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA Bentley was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver (CG) Leticia Bitas. Administrator (AD) Elvie Ringor met with LPA and was present during the visit. AD Elvie Ringor has an administrator certificate with an expiration date of September 5, 2026. The facility is a single level structure, licensed for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (1) may be bedridden and has a hospice waiver for six (6) residents. The home consists of the following: Four (4) resident bedrooms, one (1) staff bedrooms, three (3) bathrooms, a living room area, dining room area, kitchen, outdoor shaded seating area, and an attached two car garage. There are three residents on census, all present during today’s visit. LPA obtained copies of pertinent documents, including facility records, clients/staff rosters, Personnel Record (LIC500), and clients/staff records. During the visit, LPA Bentley toured the interior and exterior of the physical plant with AD Ringor and the following was observed: There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. All rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, storage for each resident’s personal belongings was observed. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked at the time of visit. CONTINUE TO LIC809-C PAGE Bathrooms were found to be clean and operational. The water temperatures in three bathrooms measured 106.1 degrees F and 114.9 degrees F. A comfortable temperature of 74 degrees F was maintained throughout the facility. LPA Bentley observed the facility to be sanitary and appropriately furnished at the time of visit. Storage areas for cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps objects were stored and locked. The kitchen was inspected and there is a two-day supply of perishable and seven-day supply of non-perishable food available. There is a two car garage with two refrigerators and additional supply of perishable items. The washer and dryer were observed to be in working condition. Facility has emergency food supply and water supply. The backyard was clean and free of clutter and debris. A shaded patio area with tables and chairs was observed. Emergency safety drills was last conducted on July 15, 2019 and a deficiency is being cited. First aid kit is maintained and contains all the necessary elements. Smoke and carbon monoxide alarms were tested and observed operational. The facility has two (2) fire extinguishers that are fully charged in the kitchen and garage, with a last service date of October 22, 2024. A working telephone (714-600-7269) remains available. Liability Insurance is effective June 30, 2024 through June 30, 2025 and licensee also provided documentation for Liability Insurance is effective June 30, 2025 through June 30, 2026. LPA Bentley conducted an audit of three (3) resident files (R1-R3) and four (4) staff files (S1-S4). A review of the Medication and Medication Administration Record (MAR) was conducted. LPA observed annual training missing for three out of four staff files. Upon review of Resident #1 (R1) centrally stored medication list and medication box, four refills are not present in facility. Licensee stated refills were requested on June 9, 2025 but have not been delivered. Interviews were conducted with three (3) residents and two (2) staff. Based on today’s observations, deficiencies are being cited as per Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, deficiency pages, and appeal rights were provided to Administrator Elvie Ringor.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has uncleared individuals staying over night

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Dwayne Mason Jr and Nancy Guillen conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Three out of three staff deny any uncleared individuals at the facility. Facility Administrator (AD) stated a resident recently passed away and family members were visiting more frequently but never stayed the night. Interview with one out of one resident that was able to be interviewed confirms the only people who stay overnight are residents and facility staff. AD indicated formal visiting hours are 10AM to 8PM but can be flexible. AD re-stated that only facility staff and residents stay overnight. LPAs verified all staff on the LIC 500 are background cleared and associated to the facility. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, LPAs are unable to corroborate the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did occur. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024 · control 22-AS-20241115154225
Sep 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Uncleared individuals staying at the facility over the weekend.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that uncleared individuals staying at the facility over the weekend, the investigation revealed the following: Three out of three staff deny any uncleared individuals at the facility. Facility Administrator indicates many family members as well as therapists visit on the weekend. Interview with two out of two residents and witness confirms only family members and medical personnel are at the facility on the weekend. Administrator indicated formal visiting hours are 9AM to 8PM but the facility is flexible with visitation. LPA verified all staff on the LIC 500 are background cleared and associated to the facility. Based on interviews conducted, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to a facility Administrator.. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240910082518
Feb 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: uncleared individuals staying at the facility over the weekend

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff, residents and witness. Regarding the allegation that uncleared individuals staying at the facility over the weekend, the investigation revealed the following: LPA observed no uncleared individuals at the facility on two different occasions including a weekend visit. All staff observed are fingerprint cleared and associated. Three out of three residents, witness and five out of five staff deny any visitors spending the night at the facility and indicate the only weekend visitors are resident family members. Based on observation and interview, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to a facility representative. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2024 · control 22-AS-20231218074941
20232 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: uncleared individuals staying at the facility over the weekend

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that uncleared individuals staying at the facility over the weekend, the investigation revealed the following: Two out of two residents and four out of four staff deny any overnight guests at the facility. Residents and staff indicate visitors come to the facility on the weekend but do not stay overnight. Facility licensee lives on-site at the facility and indicates periodic guests for a meal but no overnight stays have occurred. Facility schedule indicates Licensee is working on weekends with additional staff on-call. Due to conflicting information, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegation. Based on interviews conducted, the allegation is deemed to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to a facility representative. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231016081604
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are utilizing garage as staff's living quarters

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed Administrator and House Manager. Regarding the allegation that staff are utilizing garage as staff's living quarters, the investigation revealed the following: LPA observed two chairs and a television in the garage. House Manager/ Licensee indicates that only House Manager utilizes the area for television watching in evenings. Both indicate no staff or residents utilize the area. Code Enforcement inspected the area on 09/22/2023 and found no violations. Telephone call to Anaheim Fire confirmed the television and chairs are permissible under fire clearance granted 05/09/2023. Community Care licensing regulations state, "No room commonly used for other purposes shall be used as a sleeping room for any resident." LPA observed no evidence of the space being used as a sleeping room for resident or staff. Therefore the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility representative. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230918104141

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 26, 2023

All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing.. in a licensed facility: Obtain a California clearance... as required by the Department. This req is not being met as evidenced by: Based on record review, Licensee failed to ensure S1 has a criminal background clearance. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee to obtain a criminal record clearance for S1 and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

Sep 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with complaint visit 22-AS-20230918104141. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the complaint investigation, LPA reviewed criminal associations for staff working at the facility. Staff 1(S1) has criminal background clearance but is not associated to the facility. Based on the observations made from today's visit, deficiency is being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was discussed with the Administrator and a copy was provided to Administrator as well as Appeal Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 3, 2023

All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing... in a licensed facility: Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c). This req is not being met as evidenced by: Based on record review, Licensee failed to ensure a transfer of criminal record clearance was processed for S1. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee to process criminal record clearance for S1 and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County