Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Hillcrest Residential Care #2

Small home·Licensed for 6·Anaheim Hills, California

Licensed since 2004Licence #306002060
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedMay 7, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 7, 2026CDSS inspection record

Hillcrest Residential Care #2 is a small care home in Anaheim Hills — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2004. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Hillcrest Residential Care #2

Is Hillcrest Residential Care #2 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Hillcrest Residential Care #2 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Hillcrest Residential Care #2 been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Hillcrest Residential Care #2 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Hillcrest Residential Care #2 cost?

$5,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,250–$6,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 23 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 188 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 188 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Hillcrest Residential Care #2 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Capistrano, Eduardo, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Orange County - Anaheim is 4.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Hillcrest Residential Care #2 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Hillcrest Residential Care #2 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “HILLCREST RESIDENTIAL CARE #2”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306002060. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Capistrano, Eduardo, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,200a month to start

Likely $4,250–$6,400

From 23 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,200a month

Likely $4,250–$6,550

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,200likely $4,250–$6,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 23 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,250–$6,550
$5,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,950–$9,650
$7,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 23 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

23 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$7,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 23 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6462 E. Calle Del Norte, Anaheim Hills, CA 92807Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2004. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 7, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
7
Most recent visit
May 7, 2026
Occupied at that visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated May 7, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2004.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026230202511020241102022110

The last 36 months — 5 of 6 documents

20262 state visits · 3 documents
May 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee smoked marijuana inside the facility. Food service does not meet the needs of the residents. Staff are unable to meet the needs of the residents due to language barrier. Staff yelled at resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho arrived unannounced for the purpose of initiating the complaint investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Licensee Eduardo Capistrano and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the physical plant and successfully interviewed three of four residents, two staff, and one witness. LPA was unable to obtain a statement and qualify one resident due to their medical condition. LPA also obtained the following records for review: Face Sheets, Physcian's Reports, Personal Rights, Personnel Report Summary and training records for Staff #1 (S1). The investigation is as follows: Regarding the allegation, Licensee smoked marijuana inside the facility, it is alleged that the licensee smokes marijuana inside the facility at night causing the entire facility to become odorous. LPA conducted the tour of the physical plant. The second floor is occupied by the licensee and staff. LPA inspected all drawers and there were no evidence of marijuana. Based on the interviews, three out of three residents and two of two staff denied observing licensee smoking or smelling marijuana at night. Unsubstantiated Based on the review of the surveillance footage via the Ring app, LPA observed S1 lying down to sleep on the living room couch on May 7, 2026 at 1:55am and at 10:31pm on May 6, 2026. Therefore, based on LPA's observations, interviews which were conducted, and the records that were reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the following allegation: Staff is sleeping on the couch in the living room are deemed substantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Eduardo Capistrano, and a copy of this report was provided via email at the end of the visit. Regarding the allegation, Food service does not meet the needs of the residents, it is alleged that the residents are fed the same thing every day for breakfast, oatmeal with banana, and are left to make their own meals for lunch and dinner. Based on one meal service at 11am, LPA observed residents were served steak, mash potato with gravy, steamed broccoli, and a side of peaches. Based on the interviews, two of three residents indicated not having concerns with food. Although both residents indicated that there not being a variety of meals, they were satisfied with all meals and found it to be sufficient in meal choices, serving size, quality, and nutrition. Both residents indicated that meals were prepped by the staff. One remaining resident could not recall details. Two of two staff did not corroborate the allegation indicating that meals are prepared by staff and breakfast is alternated between oatmeal, sandwich, or eggs with a side of fruit, water, and juice. Regarding the allegation, Staff are unable to meet the needs of the residents due to language barrier, it is alleged that S1 does not speak English interfering with the care which they are not able to provide to the residents. Based on LPA's observation, residents were observed relaxing. Based on the interviews, three of three residents and two of two staff denied the allegation. The three residents expressed satisfaction with their care. Although, S1 acknowledged not being proficient in English, S1 indicated that they are able to communicate daily tasks and needs of residents via simple, plain English and through gestures. Regarding the allegation, Staff yelled at resident, it is alleged that S1 yelled at a former resident. Based on the review of the face sheets, only one of the three residents resided at the facility at the time. Three of three residents denied S1 or any other staff yelling at them or other residents. Two of two staff did not corroborate with the allegation. Therefore, based on the observations made, interviews which were conducted, and the records that were reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the following allegations: Licensee smoked marijuana inside the facility, Food service does not meet the needs of the residents, Staff are unable to meet the needs of the residents due to language barrier, and Staff yelled at resident are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Eduardo Capistrano, and a copy of this report was provided via email at the end of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260430132811

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 15, 2026

87307 Personal Accomodations and Services (a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function. The facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy for the residents, staff, and others who may reside in the facility. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the surveillance footage via the Ring app, S1 was observed sleeping on the facility couch in the living room on 5/7/26 at 1:55am and 10:31pm on 5/6/26.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that S1 will no longer be sleeping on the facility couch effective 5/15/25 after Admin forwards proof of purchase of the call buttons which will be installed in each residents' rooms. Admin will also submit an acknowledgement of understanding to LPA via email by POC due date.

May 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced Case Management visit for the purpose of issuing a deficiency after observing a violation in connection to Complaint Control Number:22-AS-20260430132811. LPA explained the reason for the visit to Licensee Eduardo Capistrano. During the investigation mentioned above, LPA reviewed the Ring surveillance footage and observed that all indoor/outdoor cameras have audio recording capabilities. A violation exits, and a deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC809-D. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Eduardo Capistrano, and a copy of this report and the appeal rights were provided at exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 18, 2026

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To have a reasonable level of personal privacy in accommodations, medical treatment, personal care and assistance, visits, communications, telephone conversations, use of the Internet, and meetings of resident and family groups. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and review of the surveillance footages via the Ring app, all indoor and outdoor cameras have an audio component which poses a potential Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that the 3 indoor cameras and 2 outdoor cameras facing the patio seats will be removed on or before the POC due date. Administrator will notify LPA if new cameras with no audio capabilities are installed. Installations must be completed on or before the POC due date.

Apr 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez made an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a Required/Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Staff Crisanta "Cristy" Gozar. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Eduardo Capistrano and explained the purpose of the inspection. During the inspection, LPA and AD conducted a tour of the inside and outside of the facility, common areas, resident rooms, kitchen, garage and observed the following: This is a two-story home, consisting of five resident bedrooms, two bathrooms, and attached two-car garage on the first floor. The second story is used solely as staff quarters. All resident bedrooms had the required furnishings. LPA observed all residents’ beds had linens and blankets. LPA observed residents watching television in the living room and resting in their respective bedrooms. Bathrooms were observed to be free of debris and mildew and faucets and toilets were operational. Water temperature tested between 126.5 – 129.5 degrees Fahrenheit; a Deficiency was cited on today’s date. LPA observed the backyard has a shaded sitting area and the facility has a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food as required by regulations, however, kitchen door and exterior gate were locked. AD was advised regarding resident personal rights and removed both locks immediately; a Deficiency was cited on today’s date. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors tested operational. Fire extinguisher was observed to have last been serviced on March 9, 2024; a Deficiency was cited on today’s date. Electric stove, microwave, laundry washer and dryer were all observed to be operable. Toxic chemicals, cleaning solutions, and disinfectants were observed to be accessible to residents in the kitchen; a Deficiency was cited on this date. Medication was observed to be centrally stored and locked. (Cont. LIC809-C) LPA reviewed three resident files and two staff files. One of three resident files did not include an examination for Communicable tuberculosis; a Deficiency was cited on today’s date. Two of two staff files did not contain any documentation for required annual staff training conducted in the past year and AD was unable to provide LPA with a copy of staff training conducted; a Deficiency was cited on today’s date. AD was also unable to provide LPA with a copy of current liability insurance covering injury to residents and guests in the amount of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and three million dollars ($3,000,000) in the total annual aggregate. LPA interviewed residents and staff. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Apr 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a required one-year annual inspection. LPA was greeted, granted entry by staff, and explained the reason for the visit. The licensee was present upon arrival and the Administrator arrived about an hour later. During the inspection, LPA Haley observed a locked closet right next to the front door used to store resident medications and resident files. Under the staircase, there is a locked storage space for additional hygiene items for the residents. Resident bedrooms were clean, organized, and had the necessary elements and were in compliance with regulation guidelines. Resident bathrooms were clean and organized as well. Hot water temperatures were measured at 105 degrees Fahrenheit. Hazardous items are kept under the sink in a locked cabinet. The kitchen is kept locked at all times when staff is not present. A perishable and non-perishable food supply that meets regulation requirements was observed. Knives are kept hidden in the pantry. All four burners and the warmer on the stove were operational. No hazardous cleaning chemicals were observed under the sink. Between the kitchen and garage is a locked office area where staff files are kept. The garage remains locked and inaccessible to residents at all times. The garage was clean and organized. Two cars were parked in the garage. A refrigerator with plenty of perishable food items was observed as well as an emergency supply of water being stored in the garage. A laundry area equipped with a washer and dryer was observed. Continued on LIC809C The backyard was organized, and walkways were free of obstruction. A storage shed with facility supplies and hazardous cleaning chemicals was observed. A jacuzzi with a secured covering under a shaded patio area was observed. There’s a locked storage room with plenty of non-perishable food items for the residents. An emergency food supply was observed. There were plenty of accessories for facility use being stored in the locked storage room. Tables and chairs were observed in the backyard area. Smoke detectors, and the carbon monoxide detector tested operational. A fully charged fire extinguisher was observed mounted on the wall in the kitchen. Emergency evacuation drills were conducted monthly. The last evacuation drill was conducted March 5, 2025. During the inspection, 4 resident files were reviewed, 5 resident medications reviewed, and 3 staff files were reviewed during the visit. A deficiencies will be cited as a result of today’s visit. An exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jul 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Mary J. Alvarado and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a (4) bedroom (2.5) bathroom home and, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, and attached garage. Licensed capacity is (6) current census is (5). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Mary J. Alvarado to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated space for client/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for clients in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Facility has a variety of food available for clients. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Record Review: LPA reviewed (3) client files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, medications and needs and services plans. LPA conducted (2) medication audit. LPA also reviewed (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator Mary J. Alvaradothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County