Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Irvine Cottage #1

Small home·Licensed for 6·Irvine, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #306006260Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 25, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitJuly 29, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderIrvine Cottages, LLCSince 2023 · 12 licensed homes

Irvine Cottage #1 is a small care home in Irvine — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Irvine Cottage #1

Is Irvine Cottage #1 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Irvine Cottage #1 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Irvine Cottage #1 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Irvine Cottage #1 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Irvine Cottage #1 cost?

$5,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,350–$6,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 188 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 188 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Irvine Cottage #1 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Irvine Cottages, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Irvine Cottages, LLC — at least 17 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Tustin is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Irvine Cottage #1 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Irvine Cottage #1 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “IRVINE COTTAGE #1”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306006260. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Irvine Cottages, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR SIX.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,300a month to start

Likely $4,350–$6,550

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,300a month

Likely $4,350–$6,700

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,300likely $4,350–$6,550

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,350–$6,700
$5,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,050–$9,750
$7,300
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 8 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,500–$8,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1 Longstreet, Irvine, CA 92620Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2023. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 25, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2023
State visits
9
Most recent visit
July 29, 2026
Occupied · August 25, 2026 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated March 27, 2026 to August 25, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026330202522020241102023330

The last 36 months — 6 of 9 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulting in residents sustaining injuries. Facility did not provide planned activities. Residents were not accorded a safe environment. Resident's representative was not provided access to the resident's record. Resident's representative was not informed about the resident's care. Facility statff made a misleading statement regarding resident's care. Staff did not ensure residents were fed resulting in weight loss

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on March 20, 2026. The Department obtained copies of pertinent documents such as resident's physician report, admission agreement, and apprasials. LPA interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegations Lack of supervision resulting in residents sustaining injuries. Facility did not provide planned activities, Residents were not accorded a safe environment, Resident's representative was not provided access to the resident's record, Resident's representative was not informed about the resident's care, Facility staff made a misleading statement regarding resident's care, Staff did not ensure residents were fed resulting in weight loss, the investigation revealed the following : Unsubstantiated It was reported to the Department that Resident 1 (R1) was injured by Resident 2 (R2) during the night/early morning hours of February 1, 2026. It was reported that staff informed Administrator Kimberly Arnett that R1 had a swollen right hand on February 1, 2026 around 9AM. Administrator stated they called R1’s responsible party to notify them of the issue. R1’s responsible party took R1 to the emergency room, during the ER visit R1’s responsible party called Administrator R1’s responsible party advised the Administrator R1 disclosed a female nurse came into their room and twisted their hand back and the female nurse then placed her hand over R1’s mouth. Administrator Kimberly reported that they reviewed internal camera footage and it showed staff placing R1 in their room around 11:03 pm. During review of the footage Administrator stated the video showed R2 going into R1’s room around 3:40am and leaving approximately 2 minutes later. Administrator Kimberly stated they called OC Sheriff’s non emergent line but was told to call back when R1 returned to the facility. R1 returned on the same day of February 1, 2026 with a splint for immobilization. It was stated then staff called OC Sheriff’s non emergent line but was transferred to Irvine Police Department. Officer M. Krouse (Badge # 655) arrived at the facility. It was reported by staff R1 and R2 were interviewed by Officer M. Krouse and staff was informed no other follow up needed for the incident. It was reported that R2 stated they were sleep walking. LPA could not confirm the events with R1 as they were not oriented to time and space during the interview process. LPA could not confirm the events with R2 as they were not available for interview. It was alleged lack of care and supervision resulted in residents sustaining injuries. Per review of R1 and R2’s physician reports neither resident had wandering issues or required awake staff. Per interviews with 2 out of 2 staff indicated no other resident required awake night staff. Interviews with 2 out of 2 staff stated this was R2’s first incident of sleep walking or issues with aggressive behaviors. It was alleged that residents were not accorded a safe environment. Per review of both R1 and R2’s pre-placement appraisals neither needed awake staff at night for wandering behaviors. Per review of incident reports submitted by the facility this is R2’s first incident of any behaviors with other residents. After the incident on February 1, 2026, R2 was re-evaluated and moved to a new facility. Interviews with 3 out of 6 residents reported they do not have concerns about their safety at the facility. It was alleged that resident's representative was not provided access to the resident's record. Administrator Kimberly reported that R1’s medical records are stored by their own health insurance and R1’s family would have to supply those reports to the facility such as after summary visits, medication list, and physician’s reports. Administrator stated there is no form that the family does not have access to unless it is an internal document meant for staff only. It was alleged that residents representative was not informed about the resident’s care. Per interviews with facility, 2 out of 2 staff deny that R1’s responsible party was not informed of R1’s care as R1’s responsible party came to the facility as a result of the facility’s reporting. It was alleged that staff made a misleading statement regarding resident’s care. Per interviews R1’s responsible party was notified that R1 had a swollen hand, no reason for the injury was provided until R1’s responsible party advised Administrator Kimberly about the “female nurse” that was later determined to be R2. It was alleged that staff did not ensure residents were fed resulting in weight loss. Per review of facility meal photos sent in November and December 2025, the facility documented R1’s meal consumption. Per review of R1’s physician’s report R1 is able to feed themselves. During today’s visit LPA observed residents eating a meal of chicken, mashed potatoes, green salad, and chopped fruit. It was alleged that the facility does not provide planned activities. Interviews with 3 out of 6 residents interviewed stated they do not wish to participate in activities. The remaining 3 residents were not oriented to time or space or were not available for interviews. Administrator Kimberly stated activities are offered such as working out, walks outside to the park, coloring and arts/crafts. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through records reviewed ,interviews and observations the allegations Lack of supervision resulting in residents sustaining injuries, Facility did not provide planned activities, Residents were not accorded a safe environment, Resident's representative was not provided access to the resident's record, Resident's representative was not informed about the resident's care, Facility staff made a misleading statement regarding resident's care, Staff did not ensure residents were fed resulting in weight loss meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260320171458
Apr 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to conduct a required annual visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed for 6 non-ambulatory residents and has 6 residents during today's visit. During today’s visit, LPA along with Compliance Manager Michelle Nesbitt toured the facility and inspected the physical plant, including but not limited to testing all smoke detectors, testing hot water temperature in bathrooms. The hot water temperature measured between 112.2 and 112,8 degrees Fahrenheit and all smoke detectors were operational. LPA inspected the facility food supply and observed the facility retained a minimum of two days perishable and seven days non-perishable food on hand. LPA observed emergency food in locked garage. Facility conducted last fire and earthquake drill 03/01/2026. LPA observed resident's medication securely stored in kitchen cabinet. LPA reviewed medications and all appear to be given as prescribed. LPA observed an empty pre rolled marijuana cigarette container on patio chair. LPA observed locked staff room to have discarded food and cigarette butts on the floor and an odor was present when door was opened. LPA reviewed two out of two staff training and fingerprint records. LPA conducted a complete review of resident records. LPA confirmed that administrator has a current administrator certificate which expires on 07/21/2026. Therefore no deficiencies are being cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2026

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting the needs and services of a resident Staff are not allowing a resident to communicate Staff do not have planned activities for a resident Staff are unable to communicate effectively Staff are not providing water to a resident Staff are overmedicating a resident Resident sustained multiple bruises due to staff neglect or physical abuse Staff do not ensure a resident is being provided appropriate therapy

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facilty and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 12/02/2025 and the initial complaint visit was conducted on 12/04/2025. LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and residents as well as obtained copies of resident records including physician report, hospital paperwork. Regarding the allegations Staff are not meeting the needs and services of a resident, Staff are not allowing a resident to communicate , Staff do not have planned activities for a resident, Staff are unable to communicate effectively , Staff are not providing water to a resident , Staff are overmedicating a resident, Resident sustained multiple bruises due to staff neglect or physical abuse, Staff do not ensure a resident is being provided appropriate therapy the investigation revealed the following: Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation that staff are not meeting residents’ needs. Per interviews with 7 out of 7 staff stated they are able to meet residents needs. Per Kimberly all residents are assessed prior to moving into the facility to ensure they are appropriately fit. Interviews with 2 out of 5 residents interviewed on 12/04/2025 stated facility offers different activities. 3 of the residents were unavailable to be interviewed or not oriented to space and time. Regarding the allegation that staff are not allowing residents to communicate, Per interviews with 7 out of 7 staff they are not restricting any residents from communicating with anyone. During interviews staff expressed understanding for resident’s personal rights including residents having communication. Regarding the allegation staff do not have planned activities. Per interviews with 7 out 7 staff stated they offer different activities including walks out of the facility. Per staff they utilize Youtube for chair workouts. Interviews with 2 out of 5 residents interviewed stated facility offers different activities. Regarding the allegation staff are unable to communicate effectively. Per interviews with 7 out of 7 staff indicate they are able to communicate effectively with residents and their families. LPA Mendivil was able to individually interview caregiving staff and they were able to communicate with LPA Mendivil. Regarding the allegation staff are not providing water to a resident Interviews with 7 out of 7 staff stated residents are provided with water and juice throughout the day. LPA Mendivil observed on 12/04/2025 and again on 03/27/2026 all residents have their own cups with water or juice. Interviews with 2 out of 5 residents stated they have water or juice available at all times. Regarding the allegation Staff are overmedicating a resident. Per interviews with 7 out of 7 staff stated they are not overmedicating residents. Staff stated they give medications are prescribed and would not give more than prescribed. Interviews with 2 out of 5 residents indicated they are not being overmedicated. Regarding the allegation resident sustained multiple bruises due to staff neglect or physical abuse. Per interviews with 7 out of 7 staff indicate staff are not neglectful or abusive towards residents in care. 2 out of 5 residents denied that staff is abusive or neglectful. Regarding the allegation staff do not provide the appropriate therapy per interviews with 7 out of 7 staff stated they will follow physician's orders for any therapy needed for the residents. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through records reviewed and interviews the allegations are determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251202134153
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to the facility today to conduct an Annual Required inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The facility is a one story building with an approved fire clearance for six non-ambulatory residents of which six may be on hospice. The facility currently has a census of two residents. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and inspected the physical plant, including but not limited to testing all smoke detectors, testing hot water temperature in three bathrooms. The hot water temperature measured between 105 and 109 degrees Fahrenheit and all smoke detectors were operational. The facility’s last fire drill was conducted on March 01, 2025. LPA inspected the facility food supply and observed the facility retained a minimum of two days perishable and seven days non-perishable food on hand. LPA observed medication storage and reviewed the centrally stored medications. Per review completed medication appear to be being given as prescribed. LPA reviewed four out of four staff training and fingerprint records. LPA conducted a complete review of resident records. LPA confirmed that administrator has a current administrator certificate which expires on July 21, 2026 Based on the observations made during today’s visit no deficiencies cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Kimberly Arnett, Compliance Manager Michelle Nesbitt and Executive Administrator Jozef Springer and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2025
Mar 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to conduct a case management. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. The facility had remolded the home and had a completed and approved fire clearance inspection on 03/4/2025. The facility is licensed for 6 non-ambulatory residents. The facility currently has zero residents. LPA Mendivil toured the facility and reviewed current floor plan. Facility is a single story home with 6 resident bedrooms , 1 staff room and 3 bathrooms. Based on today's observations no deficiencies noted. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
May 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea and Licensing Program Analyst Manager (LPM) Sheila Santos conducted an unannounced annual inspection. Upon arrival no one was home, LPA contacted Administrator Kimberly Arnett and was informed that facilities not operating at this time. There were no clients observed and construction and remodeling was notice inside the facility. Spoke to Admin. Arnett that the facility is going under remodeling and per administrator that an email was sent to licensing to notify about the on-going construction. This report was reviewed with the Administrator and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the time of exit interview for the annual inspection for Irvine Cottage #2 facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Irvine Cottages, LLC, licensed since 2023, operates 12 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County