Small home · Licensed for 6 · Palm Desert
Hovley Care
40827 Hovley Court, Palm Desert, CA 92260Licensed since 2012
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, AGE 60 AND OLDER. ADVERTISES DEMENTIA SPECIAL CARE. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3) PERSONS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Hovley Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$4,500a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,500likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,500this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,500–$5,100
- $4,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$8,650
- $7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes24 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $7,750
24 homes like this within 8 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,250–$6,050.
- St. Mary's Love and Care HomePalm Desert · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Trinity Gardens on PortolaPalm Desert · 1.8 mi · Mid-size home$7,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa De HarknessPalm Desert · 2.3 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Campbell's Loving Home CareRancho Mirage · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Luna Assisted LivingRancho Mirage · 3.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Angel's Haven Care Cathedral CityCathedral City · 4.4 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Del Oro Residential CareLa Quinta · 4.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Victoria Falls Home CarePalm Desert · 5.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Angel's Haven Care Rancho MirageRancho Mirage · 5.3 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Sun City VillaPalm Desert · 5.3 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mountain View Residential Care for the ElderlyLa Quinta · 5.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa QuinterraLa Quinta · 5.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Goldluxury VillaLa Quinta · 5.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Shiloh LivingLa Quinta · 6.0 mi · Small home$5,200Listed on its own website · *monthly pricing ranges between · seen October 5, 2026
- Dolores HomecareCathedral City · 6.3 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Monticello Senior Care in La QuintaLa Quinta · 6.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Infinite Love & Care HomesIndio · 6.5 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Attentive Manor IICathedral City · 6.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Angel HomecareCathedral City · 6.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- 4J's Elderly CareCathedral City · 6.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Gerada Home CareCathedral City · 7.0 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Tender Loving Care Assisted LivingCathedral City · 7.1 mi · Small home$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- A Romero's RetreatCathedral City · 7.1 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aubrey's VillasCathedral City · 7.5 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
40827 Hovley Court, Palm Desert, CA 92260Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Eisenhower Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.7 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #336425566 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 12 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 08/4/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Toni Nwala made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA were greeted and granted entry by caregiver Alicia Sical who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At the time of visit there were four residents home. LPA toured the facility and reviewed records. During the tour, LPA observed the facility is made up of a one (1) story home with four (4) resident bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, a living room, dining room and office/laundry room. All client bedrooms had the required furniture and lighting. LPA toured the facility's exterior and observed outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Outdoor shaded seating area is available for the residents in care. LPA observed a hallway cabinet filled with clean towels, blankets, and linen, available for the residents. LPA toured the kitchen and observed the facility has a 2-day supply of perishable foods and more than a 7-day supply of non-perishable foods, which are stored in a safe and healthful manner. LPA observed knives and sharp instruments secured in locked kitchen cabinets. Cleaning solutions and disinfectants are secured in the garage. Caregiver tested one (1) of the smoke alarms/carbon monoxide detectors and LPA observed it to be operational. LPA also observed two (3) charged fire extinguishers mounted throughout the facility with an inspection date of March 11, 2026. Medications are secured in a locked cabinet stored in kitchen area. Water temperature was tested and within regulation LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Record along with the physical medications and did not discover any discrepancies. LPA reviewed resident files and observed residents had signed admission agreements. Exit signs, emergency contact information, client's personal rights, and complaint information are visibly posted throughout the facility . During today's visit, LPA did not observe any issues or concerns. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Caregiver Alicia Sical.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a resident from hitting another resident while in care. Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision.
On March 26, 2026, at approximately 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator, Svetlana Calamaro (A1), and explained the purpose of this visit. The investigation included the following: The LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator (A1), one staff member (S1), and three residents (R2-R4). The LPA also reviewed and obtained several documents, including the Client Roster, Staff Roster, and CPR/AED/First-Aid Certificates for five staff members. Additionally, a copy of (R1)’s face sheet, the Admission Agreement dated March 6, 2021, (C1)’s Physician’s Report for Community Care Facilities (dated March 19, 2023), Medication Administration Records (MAR) from May 2023, and records of hospital visits and discharges (dated February 22, 2023) were examined. The investigation also included the Unusual Incident Report (UIR) dated 03/21/2023, staff schedules, and a copy of the Death Report (UIR) dated December 8, 2023, which was also reviewed. Unsubstantiated Allegation #1: Staff did not prevent a resident from hitting another resident while in care. The complaint alleged that on March 18, 2023, a disclosure stated that a resident had struck Resident 1 (R1). On March 26, 2026, LPA Richard interviewed the administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and explained that R1 is very active. R1 is somewhat hard of hearing and tends to raise their voice when talking to staff and other residents. A1 also mentioned that R1 has a one-on-one staff member with them at all times. During the same interviews, LPA spoke with a staff member (S1), who also denied the allegation and confirmed that no residents would ever hit R1. S1 noted that R1's hearing issues require speaking loudly to communicate effectively. Additionally, LPA interviewed three other residents (R2, R3, and R4), who denied ever being struck by staff or other residents. On March 26, 2026, LPA interviewed a family member (FM) of resident R4. The FM shared that the facility's staff are excellent at caring for residents, noting they visit every week. The FM has never witnessed any residents behaving aggressively or hitting each other, and described the facility as always quiet and pleasant. During the review of facility records on March 26, 2026, Unusual Incident Reports were submitted to the Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) regarding the incident that occurred on March 18, 2023. On March 24, 2026, the LPA contacted the responsible party (RP), who also denied the allegation. The RP stated that they live one mile from the facility and visit R1 frequently, emphasizing that the facility staff do their best to care for R1. Unfortunately, the LPA was unable to interview R1, as R1 passed away at Eisenhower Hospital on December 8, 2023. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation #2: Staff is not providing adequate care and supervision. The complaint alleged that the staff was not providing proper care to the residents. On March 26, 2026, LPA Richard interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied that the facility provided adequate supervision for the residents. The facility always has three staff members on duty. If the residents are outside, at least one staff member is always nearby. Resident 1 (R1) had a one-on-one interaction with a staff member while outside R1's room. During the same visit, LPA Richard interviewed one staff member (S1), who also denied the allegation and stated that residents sometimes go shopping, to the movies, attend local concerts, and go for walks. Additionally, LPA Richard spoke with three residents (R2-R4), all of whom denied ever being left alone at the facility and stated that the staff was excellent in caring for them. On March 26, 2026, LPA interviewed a family member (FM) for R4, who denied that the facility lacks sufficient supervision. FM also mentioned that a staff member is always with the residents. LPA Richard also contacted the responsible party (RP), who denied the allegations and stated that sufficient staff were present during the visit with R1. On March 26, 2026, LPA reviewed the facility staff members' schedules and found that three staff members are present for each shift, including the administrator. Unfortunately, LPA Richard was unable to interview R1, as R1 passed away at Eisenhower Hospital on December 8, 2023. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided to Administrator Svetlana Calamaro.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230320123356
Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is verbally abusing a resident while in care. Staff are recording a resident's conversations without their consent.
On March 26, 2026, at approximately 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator, Svetlana Calamaro (A1), and explained the purpose of this visit. The investigation included the following: The LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator (A1), one staff member (S1), and three residents (R2-R4). The LPA also reviewed and obtained several documents, including the Client Roster, Staff Roster, and CPR/AED/First-Aid Certificates for five staff members. Additionally, a copy of (R1)’s face sheet, the Admission Agreement dated March 6, 2021, (C1)’s Physician’s Report for Community Care Facilities (dated March 19, 2023), Medication Administration Records (MAR) from May 2023, and records of hospital visits and discharges (dated February 22, 2023) were examined. The investigation also included staff schedules, and a copy of the Death Report (UIR) dated December 8, 2023, which was also reviewed. Unsubstantiated Allegation #1: Staff is verbally abusing a resident while in care. The complaint alleged that staff verbally abused the residents while in care. On March 26, 2026, the LPA interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and stated that staff members would not curse or use inappropriate language toward any residents. During the same interview, the LPA interviewed one staff member (S1), who also denied ever verbally abusing R1 or any other residents. The LPA also interviewed three residents (R2-R4), all of whom denied being verbally abused by staff. Additionally, the LPA interviewed R4's family member (FM), who denied witnessing any staff verbally abusing residents. The FM mentioned that they visit quite often each week. On March 24, 2026, the LPA interviewed the responsible party (RP), who did not recall any of the allegations and said that the facility treated R1 with the most respect while R1 lived there. The LPA further interviewed the Placement Agency (PA), which denied the allegation and stated that it had never witnessed staff verbally abuse R1 in its presence. On March 26, 2026, the LPA reviewed the facility documents. There was no Unusual Incident Report faxed to the Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD). Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation #2: Staff recording a resident’s conversations without consent. The complaint alleged that staff recorded conversations on their phones without consent. On March 26, 2026, the LPA interviewed the administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and stated that resident #1 (R1) was always screaming while on the phone. We could not record the conversation because R1 used the facility phone. Additionally, it is illegal to record someone without their consent. The LPA also interviewed one staff member (S1), who denied the allegation and stated they had no reason to record R1's conversations. The LPA interviewed three residents (R2-R4), who were unaware of any recorded conversations. Furthermore, the LPA interviewed the responsible party (RP), who did not remember the allegation and stated they did not know anything about recorded conversations. The LPA also interviewed the Placement Agency (PA), which was unaware of any allegations that conversations were recorded, as the facility has no cameras inside or outside. On March 26, 2026, the LPA reviewed the facility documents. There was no Unusual Incident Report faxed to the Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) about that. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided to the Administrator Svetlana Calamaro.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230912081257
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 06/30/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Palacios made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA were greeted and granted entry by caregiver Alicia Sical who was informed of the purpose of the visit; Licensee Svetlana Calamaro arrived to the facility shortly after. Licensee, Shane Selburn and HM, Hans Laske arrived during the visit. LPA toured the facility and reviewed records. During the tour, LPA observed the facility is made up of a one (1) story home with four (4) resident bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, a living room, dining room and office/laundry room. All client bedrooms had the required furniture and lighting. LPA toured the facility's exterior and observed outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Outdoor shaded seating area is available for the residents in care. LPA observed a hallway cabinet filled with clean towels, blankets, and linen, available for the residents. LPA toured the kitchen and observed the facility has a 2-day supply of perishable foods and more than a 7-day supply of non-perishable foods, which are stored in a safe and healthful manner. LPA observed knives and sharp instruments secured in locked kitchen cabinets. Cleaning solutions and disinfectants are secured in the garage. Caregiver tested one (1) of the smoke alarms/carbon monoxide detectors and LPA observed it to be operational. LPA also observed two (3) charged fire extinguishers mounted throughout the facility. Medications are secured in a locked cabinet stored in kitchen area. LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Record along with the physical medications and did not discover any discrepancies. LPA reviewed resident files and observed residents had signed admission agreements. Exit signs, emergency contact information, client's personal rights, and complaint information are visibly posted throughout the facility . During today's visit, LPA did not observe any issues or concerns. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Licensee Svetlana Calamaro.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2025
Apr 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident do not have appropriate laundry services Resident is left soiled while in care Staff do not meet a resident's catheter needs Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident
On 4/17/2025 at 12:10 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Serrano met with administrator Svetlana Calamaro to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staffs as well as facility observation. Allegation #1: Resident do not have appropriate laundry services – Based on observation of laundry room (washer and dryer), and information received during interviews LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. During today’s visit, LPA observed the facility’s washer and dryer are currently operating. Allegation #2: Resident is left soiled while in care - Based on interviews with staff and administrator, and information received during the investigation, *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiated LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations. It indicated that resident #1 (R1) was receiving additional services from an outside source (home health). The death report indicated that R1 passed away 1.5 years ago at the hospital. Additional interview with witnesses and the alleged victim were unable to be conducted at this time due to unavailability. Allegation #3 Staff do not meet a resident's catheter needs - Based on interviews with staff and administrator, and information received during the investigation, LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations. It indicated that resident #1 (R1) was receiving additional services from an outside source (home health). The death report indicated that R1 passed away 1.5 years ago at the hospital. Additional interview with witnesses and the alleged victim were unable to be conducted at this time due to unavailability. Allegation #4 Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident – Based on interview and information received, it indicated that resident #2 (R2) was receiving additional services from an outside source (hospice care). R2 passed away in 2021. Information received during the investigation did not corroborate with the allegation. Additional interview with witnesses and the alleged victim were unable to be conducted at this time due to unavailability. During the investigation, LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations. Based on the evidence, the allegations mentioned above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099, LIC9099C were discussed and provided to Administrator Svetlana Calamaro.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20210818093958
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced annual required visit. LPA was granted entry and met with caregiver Alicia Sical-Castenada, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At the time of the visit there was one (1) staff and three (3) resident present. LPA conducted a tour of the interior and exterior, reviewed facility documents and conducted interviews. LPA observed the following: Physical plant, floors, windows, and doors were observed to be clean. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair were present. The outdoor area was observed to be free of hazards. LPA observed outdoor furniture and shaded area for clients. Facility pool had a locked gate. Detergents, cleaning solutions, and sharp and dangerous objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide was operational, and the hot water temperature met department requirements. Facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. LPA observed the facility met the required 2-day supply of perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods. Records review revealed Licensee has not paid their annual fee since 2021. A deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87156(a) will be issued. LPA reviewed two (2) staff files and training. Records review of Staff One (S1) and Staff Two (S2) did not have updated CPR/First Aid training in their file. Last documented training completed for CPR/First Aid for S1 and S2 was in 2019. A deficiency cited under Healthy and Safety Code 1569.618(c)(3) will be issued. All staff have the required personnel records on file and criminal record clearance. Two (2) resident files were reviewed and possessed all required paperwork which included Admissions Agreement and Physician's Report. Resident medication was centrally stored and locked in a cabinet located in the kitchen. Facility had a centrally stored medication list dated 03/14/2024 for Resident One (R1) that had inconsistencies with the medication available at the facility A deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87465(a)(6) will be issued. LPA reviewed the facility's emergency and disaster plan. All facility exits were clear from obstructions. LPA observed emergency supplies and first aid kit with all required items. Fire extinguishers were fully charged and inspected. Facility did not have written documentation of quarterly disaster drills being conducted in the year of 2024. A deficiency cited under Healthy and Safety Code 1569.695(c) will be issued. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report, LIC 809-D, LIC 811, and appeal rights was provided to caregiver Sical-Castenada.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2024
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff speaks to resident in an inappropriate manner. Staff did not accord resident personal privacy with visitors.
On 08/31/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chinwe Nwogene conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Licensee, Svetlana Calamaro who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, staff and resident were interviewed. Regarding the allegation “Staff speaks to resident in an inappropriate manner” it was alleged staff yelled at resident and was aggressively speaking to resident. Resident was interviewed, the interview revealed staff yells at resident. Licensee was interviewed who acknowledged speaking to resident and resident’s daughter in a raised voice because licensee heard the facility caregiver names mentioned during resident and resident daughter's conversation with a Kaiser Nurse (Substantiated). Regarding the allegation “Staff did not accord resident personal privacy with visitors” it was alleged staff was ear dropping on resident and resident daughter's conversation with nurse. Staff was interviewed who denied was ear dropping on residents’ conversation. Staff stated resident’s room door was open and staff could hear the conversation while sitting on the couch in the Livingroom. Staff heard caregiver names mentioned in the conversation, so staff went into resident’s room to explain. The nurse and resident’s daughter were interviewed who acknowledged resident’s bedroom door was open and wasn’t too far from the Livingroom where staff was sitting, and staff could have heard the conversation. However, staff barged into resident’s bedroom without knocking, started yelling, was so loud and banging on the table. Based on interviews, the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division & Chapter number 6) is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed with and provided to Jennifer Carrillo. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230828120114
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80072(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 12, 2024
Personal Rights; (a) Except .... each client shall have personal rights which include, but are not limited to, the following: (3) To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature.... This requirement is not met based as evidence by interview. The licensee did not comply by yelling at resident which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee stated moving forward resident will be spoken to in a respectful tone and a written statement of understanding of the regulation cited will be provided to LPA by the POC 2/12/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 12, 2024
Personal Rights; To have a reasonable level of personal privacy in accommodations, medical treatment, personal care and assistance, visits, communications, telephone conversations, use of the Internet, and meetings of resident and family groups This requirement is not met based as evidence by interview. The licensee did not comply by barging into resident’s bedroom without knocking and not accord resident personal privacy which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee stated a written statement of understanding of the regulation cited will be provided to LPA by the POC 2/12/2024.
Aug 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee refusing to provide medication to resident. Licensee not keeping facility adequate temperature for residents in care.
On 08/08/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chinwe Nwogene conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation(s). LPA met with caregiver, Alicia Sical who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At the time of visit, LPA interviewed staff and resident and conducted facility inspection. Regarding the allegation “Licensee refusing to provide medication to resident”, It was alleged Licensee refused to give resident medication unless resident’s responsible party provides medical POA documents. LPA interviewed Licensee who denied refusing to give resident medications. Licensee stated resident’s medications are administered to resident daily. Licensee stated resident is constantly requesting for PRN medications even when not needed and requesting medications be stored in resident’s room. Licensee stated the medical POA documents was requested because staff needs someone to communicate with about resident’s medical needs. LPA interviewed resident who denied Licensee refused to provide medication to resident. Interview with resident revealed resident receives medication daily. UNSUBSTANTIATED. Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099. Regarding the allegation “Licensee not keeping facility adequate temperature for residents in care”, it was alleged resident’s room was 87 degrees Fahrenheit. Staff was interviewed who stated two weeks ago the air conditioner was broken. Staff stated resident was moved to the living room where it was cooler. Staff stated the landlord, and the air conditioner repairer was immediately called and the air conditioner was fixed in two #2 hours. LPA interviewed resident who stated the temperature is okay. LPA inspected facility temperature including resident’s room and observed facility to be cool at 75, 76, 80 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed resident room had air conditioner and fan. UNSUBSTANTIATED. Based on interviews with staff, resident, and facility inspection there is not enough evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed with and provided to Alicia Sical.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230802155828
Jun 1, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kathleen Banrasavong arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. Upon arrival LPA was greeted by facility staff and granted entry. LPA began inspection with introduction and visit purpose. Upon arrival LPA learned that four (4) clients reside at this facility and there are currently (1) caregiver present. Facility caregiver, Alicia Sical-Casteneda (S1) gave the facility tour. LPA later observed one staff (S2) that came into the facility but was not associated through Guardian. The staff had a fingerprint clearance through DOJ in the staff’s file. There is not an Infection Control Plan on file. LPA advised facility that they need to have an infection control plan on file. Client Records-Incident Reports/Clients Rights-Information/Dental- LPA began review of client records. Four (4) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed for identification and emergency information, admission agreement, medical assessment and TB test results, needs and service plans, placement, functional assessment, centrally stored medication/destruction records, safeguard for personal property/valuables, and personal rights notification. There was one resident (R1) who has dementia that did not have an updated Physician’s report. LPA advised Alicia Sical-Casteneda that they needed to update that for the facility files and record keeping. Personnel Records/Training/and Staffing- LPAs began review of employee records- Two (2) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed employee records for first aid certification, criminal record clearance or an exemption, health screening and TB test results, employee rights, training verification, and current administrator certification. The administrator certification is not current and annual fees are not paid. LPA informed the facility representative and administrator over the phone. LPA gave PIN to caregiver to provided to licensee. (Continued on LIC809C) (Continuation from LIC809) Food Service- Food prep areas are clean and organized. Food supply meets the requirement of one (1) week supply of nonperishable and two (2) day supply of perishables. Emergency food and water supply is present. There is a locked location for chemicals and sharps in the kitchen. Physical Plant and Safety of Environment/Operational Requirements- LPA toured the facility inside and outside. LPA observed the facility to be clean and in good repair. The home is maintained at a comfortable temperature for the clients. Lighting is sufficient for safety and comfort. Water temperature measured 106.0 degrees F. Laundry facilities and a locked room is present for storing laundry soap and other chemicals. All outdoor and indoor passageways are free of obstruction. Emergency lighting is available. There is a telephone working at this location. The LIC 610, emergency disaster plan is maintained. There are no firearms at this home. There is a pool with a 5 foot locked gate around the perimeter. The fireplace is not operable and secured. Medications- are centrally stored. There is a locked cabinet allocated for medication storage. Centrally stored medication and destruction logs are maintained separately. Medications reviewed appear to have been dispensed accurately. LPA made observation throughout the inspection process to assess if the facility remains in conformity with the State Fire Marshall regulations. 5 smoke detectors were tested and found to be operational. There were two (2) fire extinguisher last was recharged, 10/15/2021. LPA advised the facility representative that the fire extinguisher was expired and for best practice they should get the fire extinguishers replaced. The facility caregiver states that they don’t do emergency disaster/fire drills. LPA advised facility to perform disaster/fire drills. (Continued on LIC809C) (Continuation from LIC809) Based on the information received during this visit today in the areas reviewed, there are 1 type A deficiency 87412(d) that will be assessed with an civil penalty that are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. Upon the facility tour, LPA learned that resident Mary Firmin had passed away April 12, 2023. Upon looking at the facility files and submitted SIRS, the facility has not sent in any SIRS since 2018. There was no death report for Mary Firmin. LPA and facility representative collaborated and agreed to have the 2 fire extinguisher replaced or recharged, an infection control plan in place, CPR and first aid certification current. Licensee states that carbon monoxide will bought and in the facility in 24 hours. The facility has agreed to have a plan of corrections emailed to the LPA by June 8, 2023. This LIC 809 was reviewed with and a copy will be emailed and mailed to the facility representative and a confirmation of receipt will be requested.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 1, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
Jun 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Chinwe Nwogene made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection focused on infection control. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Administrator, Svetlana Calamaro who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At the time of visit there was 1 staff and 4 residents present. The facility currently has zero positive or suspected Covid-19 cases. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility and made observations regarding the infection control measures that the facility has implemented. LPA observed Covid-19 postings posted throughout the facility. The facility has an adequate amount of hand hygiene supplies (soap, and hand sanitizer) in all restrooms. LPA observed an adequately secured pool within the premises. LPA was informed that no weapons or ammunition is maintained at the home. LPA informed Svetlana about the annual fees due. Svetlana agreed to pay annual fees online. LPA gave Svetlana PIN number. The facility has a plan in place to monitor residents regularly for any changes in condition, which includes daily temperature checks. The Facility will contact the resident's physician should there be any event of COVID-19 related illnesses. The facility has a designated infection control lead. The facility also cleans and disinfects the highly touched surfaces during each shift, and as needed. LPA observed PPE supplies. No deficiencies noted at the time of visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Svetlana Calamaro.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2022
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20211 state visit · 2 documents
Aug 20, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair Fire detectors are in disrepair
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of initiating an investigation for a complaint with the above allegation(s). LPA Colvin was granted entrance and met with caregiver Carmita Smith, who assisted LPA Colvin during today's inspection. Administrator Svetlana Calamaro was not able to be present during today's inspection but was contacted via telephone and informed of the purpose of today's visit. Below is a summary of today's findings: Regarding allegation "Facility is in disrepair": LPA Colvin inspected various appliances and interviewed staff and Administrator Calamaro regarding the allegation. LPA Colvin observed that the kitchen microwave was only partially operational, as the "start" button was not working, so staff must press "micro express" which starts the cooking process with 30 seconds of cook time. Due to this, caregivers must press the "micro express" button multiple times or in succession after each cooking period. LPA Colvin additionally observed that the pipes below the kitchen sink are leaking, as evidenced by buckets/containers filled with water placed underneath the sink. Substantiated The Administrator stated that they had a meeting with the landlord the previous day and is working on getting items fixed or replaced, including the garbage disposal. Based on observations and interviews, the allegation "Facility is in disrepair" is SUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation "Fire detectors are in disrepair": LPA Colvin toured the facility and tested all smoke detectors in common areas and resident bedrooms. LPA Colvin observed that all smoke detectors tested were operational except for the smoke detector in the hallway separating the two resident bedrooms on the right-hand side of the facility. When LPA Colvin tested this smoke detector, LPA Colvin hear a quiet beep, but did not observe the expected loud noise which would alert occupants to a potential fire. LPA Colvin spoke on the phone with the Administrator, who confirmed that they had heard the same small beep the previous day when they tested the alarms, as some of the smoke alarms had just been replaced. Additionally, whiel LPA Colvin was typing this report, LPA Colvin could hear the occasional beeping that LPA Colvin identified as coming from the direction of the non-operable smoke detector. This beeping is commonly observed when a smoke detector has low batteries. Therefore, based on observations and interviews, the allegation "Fire detectors are in disrepair" is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Fire clearance and fire safety deficiencies are categorized in Title 22 Regulations and Health and Safety Code as immediate hazards which result in an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500. Therefore, based on the inoperable smoke detector, LPA Colvin is citing a one time $500 civil penalty. An exit interview was conducted where this report and appeal rights were discussed. A copy of this report, LIC9099D, LIC401IM, and appeal rights was provided to caregiver Carmita Smith during the exit interview. All reports additionally will be emailed to the Administrator as well. Regarding allegation "Facility does not have a carbon monoxide detector": LPA Colvin toured the facility and did not observe any individual carbon monoxide detectors in the facility. LPA Colvin interviewed the Administrator who informed LPA Colvin that the newly purchased/installed smoke detectors have carbon monoxide detectors in them as well. LPA Colvin confirmed seeing the new smoke alarms, and LPA Colvin has the knowledge from inspecting facilities that the new smoke detectors come with carbon monoxide detectors incorporated in them. Therefore, based on observations and interviews, the allegation "Facility does not have a carbon monoxide detector" is UNFOUNDED. his agency has investigated the complaint alleging facility premises are not properly secured and facility does not have a carbon monoxide detector. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed. A copy of all reports and forms were provided to caregiver Carmita Smith during the exit interview. All reports additionally will be emailed to the Administrator as well.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2021 · control 18-AS-20210818093958
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 1569.49(c)(2)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 23, 2021
Civil penalties...for deficiencies: (c) The department shall assess an immediate civil penalty of five hundred dollars ($500)...for any of the following serious violations: (2) (A) Fire clearance violations, including, but not limited to...inoperable smoke alarms... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with 1 of 6 smoke detectors. LPA Colvin observed the smoke detector in the hallway in-between the resident bedrooms on the right of the facility to be inoperable. This is an immediate safety hazard for all residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have the smoke detector fixed, replaced, or have the batteries changed, whichever is required to make it operational. Licensee may self-certify to LPA Colvin that the smoke detector is operational. Self-certification due to LPA Colvun by 8/23/21.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 31, 2021
Maintenance and Operation: (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with two facility appliances/fixtures. LPA Colvin observed the kitchen microwave and kitchen sink to be in disrepair (start button on microwave and leaking sink pipes). This is a potential personal rights violation.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have the microwave and kitchen sink pipes either repaired or replaced. Licensee may self-certify to LPA Colvin that the appliances/fixtures have been corrected. Self-certification due to LPA Colvun by 8/31/21.
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Aug 20, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of investigating a complaint (#18-AS-20210818093958). During LPA Colvin's inspection, LPA Colvin observed additional items that needed to be addressed with the Administrator. Below is a summary of what was observed: During LPA Colvin's inspection today, LPA Colvin was unable to access staff files, as they were not on site at the facility. Facilities are required to have all files available to Licensing to inspect at all times. Deficiency cited. Additionally, during LPA Colvin's review of resident files, LPA Colvin observed that one resident (R1) is classified as bedridden based on their Physician's Report from 2/25/21. The facility does not currently have a fire clearance for bedridden residents and does not have a program plan for caring for bedridden residents as well. Usually, a violation of the fire clearance would result in an immediate civil penalty of $500, however, LPA Colvin was informed by the Administrator that R1 has been served with a 30-day eviction notice. Health and Safety code 1569.49(c)(2)(A)(ii) states that if the eviction process has been initiated, the facility shall not be cited civil penalties. LPA Colvin will still be citing a deficiency and the facility shall either have R1 relocated or apply for bedridden clearance through Community Care Licensing. Deficiency cited. An exit interview was conducted where this report and appeal rights were discussed. A copy of this report, LIC809D, and appeal rights was provided to caregiver Carmita Smith during the exit interview. All reports additionally will be emailed to the Administrator as well.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.72(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 23, 2021
Residents requiring skilled nursing or intermediate care; bedridden residents: (a) ...no resident shall be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly if any of the following apply: (2) The resident is bedridden...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with 1 of 4 residents (R1). LPA Colvin observed in R1's Phsycian's Report dated 2/25/21 that R1 is bedridden. The facility is licensed and has fire clearance for non-ambulatory only. This is an immediate safety risk for R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to either relocate R1, apply for bedridden clearance. Licensee shall provide LPA Colvin with etiher the application for bedridden clearance, or proof of working on relocating R1 by Plan of Correction date of 8/23/21.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87412(g) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 31, 2021
Personnel Records: (g) All personnel records shall be maintained at the facility and shall be available to the licensing agency for review. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with all staff files. LPA Colvin was unable to review staff files as they were not on site and not provided to LPA Colvin during the inspection. This is a potential safety and personal rights violation to all residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to supply LPA Colvin with the background clearance inforamtion for all current staff as well as staff schedule by 8/27/21. Licensee to additionally either return all files to the facility or implement plan for Licensing to access files. Licensee to provide LPA Colvin with update by 8/31/21.
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the March 26, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Hovley Care LLC, licensed since 2012.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2012, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 11
- Total complaints
- 5
- Substantiated allegations
- 4
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2012, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 4 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 5 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Hovley Care
Is Hovley Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Hovley Care licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Hovley Care been cited?
0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is Hovley Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Hovley Care cost?
$4,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Palm Desert that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $5,688 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Hovley Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Hovley Care LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Eisenhower Medical Center is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Hovley Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Hovley Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “HOVLEY CARE LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #336425566. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Hovley Care LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 5 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Riverside County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$5,795 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,322 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,225 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Riverside County