Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Hamner Manor

Small home·Licensed for 6·Mira Loma, California

Licensed since 2008Licence #336423397
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit2 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 23, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMarch 20, 2026CDSS inspection record

Hamner Manor is a small care home in Mira Loma — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2008. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Hamner Manor

Is Hamner Manor licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Hamner Manor licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Hamner Manor been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Hamner Manor still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Hamner Manor cost?

$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$5,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 161 other homes of a similar licensed size across Riverside County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 161 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Hamner Manor take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Maria Rocio Sencion, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Hamner Manor keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Hamner Manor license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “HAMNER MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #336423397. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Maria Rocio Sencion, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is March 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
TOTAL CAPACITY OF SIX (6) RESIDENTS, AGE 60 AND OLDER. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2) TERMINALLY ILL RESIDENTS AT ANY ONE TIME. ROOM #3 APPROVED FOR TWO (2) NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS. ROOMS #1 AND #2 APPROVED FOR TWO (2) AMBULATORY ONLY CLIENTS IN EACH ROOM.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,700–$5,550

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $3,700–$5,750

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,700–$5,550

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$5,750
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,850
$6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,100–$5,800.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7121 Mackinaw Ct, Mira Loma, CA 91752Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2008. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 20, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
6
Most recent visit
March 20, 2026
Occupied · July 23, 2025 visit
2 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 12, 2024 to July 23, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2008.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202522020242202022110

The last 36 months — 5 of 6 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Rico met with Administrator Lesly Vannoy. The capacity is (6) current census is (0).The facility is a five (5) bedroom, three (3) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room and attached garage. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). LPA Rico toured the facility and observed no residents inside the facility. The Administrator stated the facility is not accepting new residents at the moment. In addition, the Administrator told LPA that she will notified Community Care Licensing for the proper closure. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator Lesly Vannoy.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not allow resident to utilize personal bank account. Facility is not meeting the needs of the resident. Facility staff is verbally abusive towards resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Lesly Vannoy and staff April Lopez and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews, document reviews, and facility tour. First Allegation:Facility does not allow resident to utilize personal bank account. During staff interviews, 2 out of the 2 staff informed LPA that R1 did not had an identity card to open a bank account so R1 could not go to bank to open a bank account. R1 managed own money recived from Social security. R#2 stated that they manage their own money and R#3 has family as a responsible party in records. Unsubstantiated Second Allegation: Facility is not meeting the needs of the resident. During staff interviews, 2 out of the 2 staff informed LPA that staff looks after the resident and ensures that resident needs are met. 1 out of the 2 residents, stated staff always meets their needs and never had any issues regarding the care in the facility. Third Allegation: Facility staff is verbally abusive towards resident. During staff interviews, 2 out of the 2 staff informed LPA that staff never verbally abusive towards the residents in care. 1 out of the 2 residents, stated staff is never verbally abusive towards residents and treat them with respect and care. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the one (1) allegation listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report LIC 9099, LIC 9099C were discussed and provided to Administrator Lesley Vannoy.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025 · control 56-AS-20230515142801
Mar 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator April Lopez and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (5). LPA was accompanied by Administrator April Lopez and House Manager Maria Abaya to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated office for resident/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (3) resident medications and (1) hospice file. During medication audit LPA Rico observed R1 PRN medications response and time were not documented. Furthermore, LPA also reviewed (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809)(LIC809D) was discussed and provided to Administrator April Lopez.Along with a copy of appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Lesly Vannoy and staff April Lopez and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews, document reviews, and facility tour. For the allegation, Staff failed to seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff informed LPA that R1 receives medical attention in a timely manner. 3 out of the 4 staff informed LPA that R1 has behaviors where she does not sleep and yells throughout the night/day. In addition, 2 out of the 4 staff stated they have reached to R1 Physician for a re-evaluation on medications and staff are now providing 1 on 1 care. Unsubstantiated During resident interviews, 2 out of the 5 residents indicated they receive medical attention in a timely manner. During resident interviews, LPA Rico did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. During record review, LPA discovered that on 4/23/2024 the facility requested a re-evaluation for R1. On 4/26/2024 facility received new medication order for R1. LPA did not observed bruises on R1 face. R1 refused for photo to be taken by LPA Rico. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the one (1) allegation listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Lesley Vannoy along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240607153815
Mar 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 03/08/2024 at 08:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Brown met with a staff and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were three (3) staff present, and five (5) residents present. Licensee/Administrator Lesley Vannoy was contacted and arrived during the visit. LPA Brown explained the purpose of the visit to Licensee/Administrator Vannoy. The facility is a six (6) bedroom, three (3) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room, laundry room and detached garage. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of six (6) residents of which two (2) can be non-ambulatory residents. The facility has two (2) Hospice Waiver. The current census is five (5) residents. LPA Brown was accompanied by Staff #4 (S4) to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). LPA Brown observed no obstructions to outdoor and indoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA Brown inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA Brown observed grab bars and non-skid mat in the resident bathrooms. Also, LPA Brown observed Resident #5 (R5) with full bed rails and Licensee/Administrator Vannoy reported to LPA Brown that R5 is not on Hospice Care and no written order from the physician was observed indicating the need for postural support/full bed rail. LPA Brown observed no exception letter submitted and approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) for R5's full bed rail. Deficiency will be issued. To add to that, LPA Brown observed Resident #1 (R1), Resident #3 (R3), and Resident #4 (R4) have half bed rails and no written order from their physician indicating the need for half bed rail for mobility. Deficiency will be issued. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** LPA Brown measured and observed the water temperature in the bathroom to be at 115 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCLD complaint poster and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a cabinet with the resident’s medications locked. Moreover, LPA Brown observed one (1) bottle of cleaning supply in the residents' shared bathroom cabinet, not locked and accessible to residents in care. Deficiency will be issued. Food Service: Seven (7) days non-perishable and two (2) days perishable food supply observed at the facility. Care & Supervision: The facility has an administrator present in the facility. LPA Brown observed sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA reviewed three (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and resident appraisals. The files were complete with updated physician’s reports, admissions agreements, and preadmissions/resident appraisals. LPA reviewed four (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings with tuberculosis (TB) result. LPA found that Staff #6 (S6) working at the facility with criminal background clearance but the facility did not transfer S6 criminal background clearance to the facility. Licensee confirmed to LPA Brown that S6 had been working at the facility since 08/23/2017. Deficiency and civil penalty of $500.00 will be issued during the facility visit today, 03/08/2024 and will continue to be assessed of $100.00 per day until corrected. Furthermore, two (2) residents medication were audited and LPA Brown observed Resident #4 (R4) one (1) medication dispensed and staff did not update R4's dispensed medication in R4 Medication Administration Record (MAR). Deficiency will be issued. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC809), LIC809D, LIC421BG, LIC9102TA and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Lesley Vannoy.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 8, 2024

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County