Small home · Licensed for 5 · Roseville

Greening's Care Home

1030 Haman Way, Roseville, CA 95678Licensed since 2006

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,800 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950 See costs

No openings reported

Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
Licensed for 5: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days

AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

Wheelchairup to 5 residents
Dementia
Hospiceup to 1 resident

Not on file: bedridden approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording

LICENSED FOR 5 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND OVER. APPROVED TO PROVIDE HOSPICE CARE FOR ONE (1) RESIDENT.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Greening's Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,800a month to start

Likely $3,950–$5,950

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,800likely a month

Room

Daily care

Sharing the room

Starting monthly rate$4,800likely $3,950–$5,950
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,950–$6,100: $4,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,650–$9,300: $7,300

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance

MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.

If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers

Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $6,800

9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$6,300.

Foothills Senior CareRoseville · 1.6 mi · Small home
$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
Bridgeway Senior CareRoseville · 1.7 mi · Small home
$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
Roseberry CareRoseville · 1.7 mi · Mid-size home
$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Sapphire Senior CareRoseville · 1.9 mi · Small home
$4,000Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
Broadway Senior LivingRoseville · 2.1 mi · Small home
$6,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
Wood Creek Senior CareRoseville · 2.5 mi · Small home
$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
Vista Hills Senior Care 2Roseville · 2.5 mi · Small home
$5,200Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
Splendor Oaks Senior Living 2Roseville · 2.8 mi · Small home
$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
Aunt Dottie's PlaceRoseville · 2.9 mi · Small home
$5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026

How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.

Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask

The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

1030 Haman Way, Roseville, CA 95678Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

Sutter Roseville Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.1 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #315001780 · See the state’s own record

The last 36 months — 10 of 12 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unfounded”.

20264 state visits · 4 documents

Jun 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 6/23/26 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool criteria. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator was present to assist. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Residents interviewed stated they are happy with care. Exit gate from the side yard will be repaired to open/close freely. LPA discussed PIN re.: Admin Cert LPA reviewed 2 resident files. Files are complete. Care plans will be kept current and reviewed with resident of POA. LPA did not review staff files as owner operators are both Admin Certified. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted with licensee and copy of left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2026

May 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 5/12/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly, conducted a case management visit while delivering complaint findings and met with Administrator. On 5/6/26 R1 experienced a fall while toileting independently. The fall resulted in a a leg fracture. LPA reviewed records and received copies. LPA interviewed licensees. R1 medical assessment and care plan stated R1 transfers independently. The fall was unwitnessed. 9-1-1 was called to assist. As a result of today’s inspection, no deficiencies were noted. Report reviewed. Copy of report and appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026

Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 3/24/26, LPA Mknelly visited the facility unannounced and met with Administrator. The reason for the visit was to confirm phone and email are correct on file and operational. LPA confirmed contacts. No deficiencies are noted at this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026

Feb 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 2/23/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly, conducted a case management visit and met with Administrator. LPA inspected the home. Home improvements are in process. LPA and administrator discussed ongoing plans for improving and managing operations. TSP was discussed and accepted. As a result of today’s inspection, no deficiencies were noted. Report reviewed. Copy of report and appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2026

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 9/25/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly, conducted a case management visit met with Administrator . The purpose of the inspection was to follow-up on issues previously discussed regarding staffing, upkeep of the facility and activities for residents. At todays inspection, Administrator and a caregiver were present. Several topics discussed. LPA and licensee will schedule a meeting to establish an action plan. As a result of today’s inspection, no deficiencies were noted. Report reviewed. Copy of report emailed to licensee for signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025

May 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 5/28/25 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool criteria. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator was present to assist. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Residents interviewed stated they are happy with care. Water temperature will continue to be monitored and fire extinguisher will be recertified. LPA advised developing a deep cleaning routine. LPA discussed new heat safety PIN and and pending Admin Cert .webinar. LPA reviewed 4 resident files. Files are complete LPA and licensee discussed organization or files. LPA reviewed 1 staff files. Staff file was complete. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted with licensee and copy of left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025

20243 state visits · 3 documents

Jul 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not ensuring that an appropriately skilled professional is assisting the resident with injections

On 7/26/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly LPA Mknelly arrived and met with Administrator to investigate and deliver investigation findings. LPA reviewed resident R1 records and interviewed the licensee. LPA finds that facility met Tittle 22 requirements. R1 was a resident 5/4/24- 7/5/24. LIC 602 stated R1 independently managed his injections. Discharge inventory found R1 had excess supplies of alcohol pads for his tests and injection. Licensee observed R1 tests and injections. R1 had made proceudres. Previous allegations that the department investigated on 6/28/24 that were unfounded. LPA received copies of R1's LIC 602, inventory and emergency contact. This agency has investigated the above complaint allegations. We have found that the complaint is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted and report provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240719160546

Jun 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a case management inspection following receipt of information relating to resident (R1). LPA met with Lita Greening, Administrator and Andy Greening, Administrator, and stated the reason for today's inspection. LPA discussed the specific information received from an outside source relating to (R1) with both Administrators. LPA and Administrator toured the facility, including the following areas: resident bathrooms, refrigerator/freezer food, smoke/monoxide alarms, filtered water from the refrigerator, and reviewed documentation related to the medication records. LPA observed that an antibiotic medication for (R1) that was filled on 6/21/24. Administrators confirmed the medication was picked up on 6/22/24 and the 8:00 pm dosage was administered on 6/22/24. (R1) was taken to the hospital on Sunday, 6/23/24, and was then transferred to another hospital/rehab in his health care group, where he remains for up to two weeks. LPA interviewed one resident (R2) about the food and water served at the facility. LPA observed (3) residents to be in their rooms during the inspection. Also discussed was Regulation 87224/Eviction Procedures. LPA printed a copy of the regulation for easy reference. There are no deficiencies issued in this report. Exit interview. Copy of report provided to the Administrators.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 28, 2024

Jun 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 6/5/24 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator was present to assist. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. The home is clean and residents interviewed stated they are happy with care. LPA reviewed 5 resident files. Advisories written for minor corrections needed. LPA reviewed 2 staff files. Staff training documentation is noted. Deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted with licensee and copy of report and appeal rights left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2024

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20231 state visit · 1 document

Nov 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 11/29/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly, conducted a case management visit while delivering complaint findings and met with Administrator. On 11/22/23, R1 was able to leave without assistance when unsupervised and a contractor had left the front door open. R1 was found by emergency responders at a nearby park and returned to the home uninjured. R1 has dementia and is unable to leave unassisted. As a result of the investigation, the following deficiencies were cited on 809-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed. Copy of report and appeal rights provided to designee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Nov 30, 2023

Observation of the Resident The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. This requirement was not met based on reports that resident R1 left unattended before found after 50 minutes. This posed an immediate risk to the resident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will submit their observation and awol procedure to CCL by 11/30/23

Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 2 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Jun 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 06/30/2023 at 12:20 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarena Keosavang and Jaynae Boyles arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. . LPAs met with Administrator, Estelita Greenings, and explained the purpose of the visit. At 12:25 PM, LPAs and Administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, residents' bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, and backyard. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies is adequate. Toxic and cleaning supplies locked and is inaccessible to residents in care. The hot water temperature was measured in the bathroom at 120 degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit was completed. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 06/25/2022. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted throughout the facility. At 12:40 PM, LPA reviewed a total of two (2) resident files. Resident files contain signed admission agreements, physician's reports, appraisals and needs and services, releases, and resident's rights. Medications are centrally stored, locked, and appear to be given per doctor order. LPA compared medications to those being given for two (2) residents and found no discrepancies. Facility is correctly using the Medication Administration Records (MAR). LPA reviewed a total of one (1) staff record. Staff has training in medications, first aid and CPR, and other various areas of care provision. No deficiencies being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2023

20221 state visit · 1 document

May 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 5/26/22 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPA were screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator arrived. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. LPA and licensee completed the infection control domain. Home is in significant compliance. Water temperature was adjusted while LPA was present. LPA advised: more detailed symptom screening, Fit testing, recording daily sanitizing, regularly monitor water temperature, maintain PRN records and authorization letters, register for Guardian. LPA requested the following records: Resident roster, staff roster lic 500, proof of insurance, submit an updated facility sketch and LIC 308 (for designees if applicable). As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were observed. Exit interview conducted and copy of report providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022

4 of 5 beds were occupied at the July 26, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Greening, Estelita, licensed since 2006.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2006, as the state’s facility page counts them

State visits on file: 12
Total complaints: 1
Substantiated allegations: 0
Type A citations: 0
Type B citations: 0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2006, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size

	This home	Typical
Type A citations	0	0
Type B citations	0	0
Substantiated allegations	0	0
Total complaints	1	0

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean

Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record error Operate this home? Respond or correct, free →

Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Greening's Care Home

Is Greening's Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Greening's Care Home licensed for?

5 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Greening's Care Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Greening's Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does Greening's Care Home cost?

$4,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,950–$5,950. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Roseville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,375 to $5,625 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Greening's Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Greening, Estelita, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Roseville Medical Center is 3.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Greening's Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.